Showing posts with label 'Close. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 'Close. Show all posts

Sunday, December 29, 2013

Target’s Close Relationship to Government Needs to Be Watched




Target’s Forsenic Services is who the FBI, Secret Service, BATF and others have turned to for help for two decades. Now they’ve been pwned in the third largest credit card heist in history. Will this event be used to further a biometric agenda?


David Knight


“Unbeknownst to most, Target has a top-rated forensic services laboratory that provides forensic examinations, and assists outside law enforcement with help on special cases.” — Target’s Bullseye View



Just like Sherlock Holmes was the consulting detective who was sought out by Scotland Yard’s Inspector Lestrade for his forensic expertise, Target has played Sherlock for the FBI, BATF, Secret Service, local law enforcement and even international agencies like the World Customs Organization. When they’re flumoxed, they head to Target — for the Forensic Lab Services.


Target’s forensic expertise has its roots in loss prevention. But unlike other corporations, Target pursued it to such a degree that they surpassed the capabilities of government crime labs. In a Washington Post article eight years ago, Nathan K. Garvis, Target’s vice president of government affairs at the time said “In many ways, Target is actually a high-tech company masquerading as a retailer.” Target has been actively involved with law enforcement since the mid-90′s but “intensified” after 9/11.


And Target’s high tech masquerading isn’t just about crime solving. Target is watching its customers very, very closely. Target was able to tell that a teenage girl was pregnant before her father even knew by profiling her purchases. Their data mining was so detailed and intensive that they noticed that pregnant women began buying certain vitamin supplements and things like unscented lotion. When they sent coupons obviously targeted to pregnant women, the father was incensed and complained to a Target manager that he felt they were trying to encourage his daughter to get pregnant. On a subsequent contact, the father told the Target manager that his daughter had already been pregnant at the time and he wasn’t aware of it. That’s the power of “metadata” that the government keeps telling us is not so important while they build massive storage capabilities to capture and analyze it.


Target is by no means the only retailer profiling and data mining customers. Any and all data that companies get on you is sold to other corporations and given freely to the government without a search warrant. The basis of the decision on Friday by District Court Judge Pauley that gave the green light to NSA spying was that any information a third party has on you can get obtained without a search warrant. The government can bribe, buy or blackmail corporations or individuals to get that data. We have become commodities in an informant society.


But Target’s cozy relationship with government raises ethical issues as well. Eight years ago, Professor of business ethics and public policy said of Target’s Forensics Services, “It is a tricky issue when firms get too close to government. There is no reason we need to say that anything bad is happening, but we do need to watch.”


We’ve just seen one of the most massive thefts of financial data ever. Over 40 million credit card numbers, with their PIN data has been stolen. And they were stolen from a company that has been the leader in forensic sophistication for 20 years. A company the government relies upon to investigate crime. If you were a criminal hacker, sophisticated enough to get away with a crime of that magnitude, wouldn’t you know about Target’s Forensic Services? Wouldn’t another company be an easier mark?


As the business ethics professor said 8 years ago, Target’s close relationship with the government needs to be watched. If we see “anything bad is happening”, like using this theft to push for a biometric identification agenda, we should all start asking a lot of questions.


With permission
Source:
Infowars


Distributed by RINF Alternative News





WHAT REALLY HAPPENED



Target’s Close Relationship to Government Needs to Be Watched

Monday, October 7, 2013

... Close pull-offs to bar views of Mount Rushmore...


A few days BigFurHat @iOTW predicted the following:


mount-rushmore


Many laughed thinking it was silly.    Well, it has indeed come to pass


Rushmore blockage stirs anger in S.D.  - Blocking access to trails and programs at South Dakota’s most popular attraction was one thing, but state officials didn’t expect Congress’ budget stalemate to shut down a view of Mount Rushmore.


The National Park Service placed cones along highway viewing areas outside Mount Rushmore this week, barring visitors from pulling over and taking pictures of the famed monument.  (link)


mt rushmore blocked


continue reading





Drudge Report Feed



... Close pull-offs to bar views of Mount Rushmore...

Saturday, October 5, 2013

Feds attempt to close ocean...



The Park Service will also have rangers on duty to police the ban. Of access to an ocean. The government will probably use more personnel and spend more resources to attempt to close the ocean, than it would in its normal course of business. 


This is governing by temper-tantrum. It is on par with the government’s ham-fisted attempts to close the DC WWII Memorial, an open-air public monument that is normally accessible 24 hours a day. By accessible I mean, you walk up to it. When you have finished reflecting, you then walk away for it. 


At least that Memorial is an actual structure, with some kind of perimeter that can be fenced off. Florida Bay is the ocean. How, pray tell, do you “close” 1,100 square miles of ocean? Why would one even need to do so?


Apparently, according to an anonymous Park Service ranger, “We’ve been told to make life as difficult for people as we can. It’s disgusting.” 


Centuries ago, King Canute famously failed to command the ocean tide to stop. His display was actually a means to educate his subjects on the limits of royal power. Today, however, our President actually believes he has the power to control the oceans. 





Drudge Report Feed



Feds attempt to close ocean...