Articles and More!: Enrollment

Showing posts with label Enrollment. Show all posts

Saturday, March 1, 2014

Many Still Unaware of Looming Obamacare Enrollment Deadline

The clock is ticking as the Obama administration nears the March 31 deadline for people to sign up in private insurance plans through Obamacare, with officials hoping for a final rush to bolster the exchanges.

Initially, the administration had hoped to enroll 7 million people in plans, but those numbers remain about 3 million behind the target goal, mainly because of the botched rollout of the Healthcare.gov website, reports The Hill.

But a poll released this week threw cold water on that expectation by revealing the public’s ignorance about when they need to gain health coverage or pay a fine.

Three in four uninsured patients are not aware of the March 31 deadline, the Kaiser Family
Foundation found in its latest monthly Health Tracking Poll.

“Deadlines are something that Americans react to, whether it’s filing or taxes or other responsibilities in society,” Tad Devine, a Democratic strategist and adviser to John Kerry’s 2004 run for president, told The Hill. “Highlighting that date can be a really positive tool. Just making people aware of the deadline is likely to motivate them to join the system.”

House Republicans are voting next week to eliminate the individual mandate penalty for this year, a rule that says people who do not have insurance by the deadline will either be fined $ 95 or one percent of their income.

But Democrats say voters want to see Obamacare fixed and improved, not repealed, said a memo from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and the Kaiser poll found 56 percent of the respondents believe Obamacare should remain the law.

Groups like Enroll America and health insurance companies are also spreading the word about the looming deadline,

In addition, the Obama administration on Friday said some people will be able to receive federal subsidies for health insurance bought in the private market and not through the Obamacare exchanges, reports The New York Times.

Technical problems with the federal exchange site had prevented some customers from using the online service to find insurance and subsidies, federal officials said.

Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber, a Democrat, asked the federal government to allow the tax credits, and several other states that have their own exchanges, including Maryland, Hawaii, and Massachusetts, have also experienced difficulties.

“We recognize that some states have experienced difficulties in processing automated eligibility determinations and enrollments,” said Aaron K. Albright, a spokesman for the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. “We released guidance providing options to marketplaces to ensure eligible consumers have access to financial assistance.”

The new policy will apply to people who were not able to buy insurance through the exchanges because of technical issues, and ended up signing up for private insurance through the marketplace to make sure they were covered before the deadline.

The subsidies will be paid retroactively, and Republican Pennsylvania Rep. Joe Pitts, who chairs the Energy and Commerce subcommittee on health said the Obama administration is “ignoring the law” with the new policy change.

But Sara Rosenbaum, a professor of health law and policy at George Washington University, said the Obama administration is avoiding a legal liability by allowing the subsidies.

“People could have gone to court to obtain benefits denied without due process of law, because of a breakdown in government eligibility systems, and a judge would probably have ordered retroactive relief,” Rosenbaum said. “The federal government is voluntarily providing equitable relief that a court would have given.”

Meanwhile, President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden and others spent last week pushing Obamacare, including Michelle Obama’s appearance on the Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon last week, reports Politico.

In addition, Obama and others have been appearing on national radio talk shows and more to make their push as the deadline gets nearer.

“Folks only have about five weeks left,” Obama said on the Russ Parr Morning Show. “Don’t believe all the misinformation that’s out there because that is all politics and that is all directed toward me coming from the other side. Check for yourself whether this makes sense.”

The first lady has been using her appearances to push young people to apply for insurance.

“In addition to our old folks who don’t want to go to the doctor, young people think they’re invincible,” she said this past week. “The fact of the matter is the young lady who is still wearing the heels in the snow, who is going to slip and crack her behind on a patch of ice, is going to need insurance.”

Related Stories:

Biden: ‘We May Not Get to 7 Million’ by Obamacare Deadline

Report: Half of Obamacare ‘Enrollees’ Still Owe Their Premiums

Newsmax – Newsfront

Many Still Unaware of Looming Obamacare Enrollment Deadline

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Immigrant Youth in North Carolina Faces Discrimination – Denied Enrollment in High School

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.

Immigrant Youth in North Carolina Faces Discrimination – Denied Enrollment in High School

Monday, January 13, 2014

A Second Look at Medicaid Enrollment Numbers

Last week I examined the Obama administration’s claims that the Affordable Care Act was responsible for 4 million Medicaid enrollments in October and November. I concluded that these numbers were off, and badly so. At the same time, I made clear that my estimate of 200,000 actual new enrollees was just an estimate, and could be off by a substantial amount. I suggested, somewhat arbitrarily, doubling that number to 400,000 for what I thought would be a generous estimate of how many “newly eligibles” signed up for Medicaid due to Obamacare in October and November.

There were two major problems with the administration’s numbers. First, of the 4 million new enrollees, more than half of were in states that did not even undertake the Obamacare Medicaid expansion. So we can be pretty comfortable that the number of enrollees due to the ACA is no more than 1.9 million, using the data provided by the administration. (There are probably some previously eligible folk who decided to apply after hearing about the expansion, but their number is likely relatively small.)

The second issue is that of those 1.9 million, some would have enrolled (or re-enrolled) in the program under the pre-expansion rules. Every state had a Medicaid program in place prior to the expansion, although the eligibility level varied widely from state to state, and therefore would have signed up people in the program absent the new funding. Looking at the changes in the application rates between states that undertook the expansion and those that did not, I estimated that around 200,000 of those applicants were newly eligible under the Medicaid expansion.

Today I want to take a slightly different look at these data, focusing on the great state of Arkansas. Arkansas is interesting — it agreed to the expansion, but rather than placing its newly eligible population on the traditional Medicaid program, it instead offered them private insurance. As part of the agreement with the federal government, it agreed to track how many of its applicants were, in fact, newly eligible under the expansion.

This gives us firmer data than we have for the states as a whole. It isn’t perfect, for reasons we’ll get into later; for now just trust me that it provides a sort of “best case” scenario for the expansion numbers. But it allows us to get at our estimates from a different angle.

According to my knowledgeable sources, just under 70,000 newly eligible people enrolled in Medicaid through the end of November in Arkansas. Again, we are pretty certain that all of these enrollees were not previously eligible for Medicaid, and are wholly attributable to the state’s expansion.

If we look at the overall enrollment numbers supplied by the state to CMS, 103,000 people were determined to be eligible for Medicaid in October, while another 37,000 were determined to be eligible in November. So we have 140,000 new enrollees overall. But we also know that the state numbers were just estimates — the initial estimates for October grew by another 50 percent by the time the November numbers came out. But we’ll be very cautious here, and assume that another 20,000 were found eligible for Medicaid in Arkansas in October by the time the numbers were finalized.

This suggests that if there were 160,000 new enrollees in Medicaid in Arkansas in October and November of 2010, about 44 percent of them were eligible due to the expansion, while 56 percent were enrolling under the old rules.

Now remember, of the 4 million enrollees that the administration claimed were due to the Medicaid expansion, only 1.9 million were in states that expanded Medicaid in the first place. If we assume that 44 percent of these enrollees were eligible under the new rules, that gives us an estimate of 836,000. That’s a lot more than my initial estimate of 200,000, but it is still only 21 percent of the number indicated by the administration.

But Arkansas is something of the best-case scenario for the expansion. It’s highly unlikely that 44 percent of the Medicaid enrollees were due to the ACA expansion in any other state.

We have to understand two things about Arkansas. First, it undertook an aggressive outreach program, mailing everyone on SNAP (a.k.a. food stamps) to inform them about the new eligibility cutoff. So it would be more likely to attract newly eligible enrollees in the first place.

Second, and more importantly, Arkansas had one of the stingiest Medicaid plans in the country to begin with. Take a look at the following chart, which examines one category for Medicaid eligibility: adults (Medicaid also covers younger kids, pregnant women, and a few other categories). The chart lists the pre-expansion eligibility cutoff (as a percentage of the federal poverty level) for families and non-disabled adults in states that expanded Medicaid:

The median state that expanded Medicaid already covered eligibility up to 106 percent of the federal poverty level for families. Arkansas, by contrast, weighed in at 17 percent, although with respect to poor, non-disabled adults, it is at the median — zero percent coverage. So when Arkansas expanded eligibility, it created a newly eligible category that covered working families earning between 16 percent and 138 percent of the federal poverty level. The only other states that came close to undertaking this sort of expansion were West Virginia and Oregon.

When California expanded eligibility, because its baseline was so high to begin with, it only did so for families making between 106 percent and 138 percent of the federal poverty level, although it let in a large number of non-disabled adults. Because of this, newly eligible people in California almost certainly make up a much, much smaller share of the October/November enrollment numbers than they do in Arkansas. Moreover, most of the really big states that expanded eligibility — New York, Illinois, California, and Ohio — already had relatively generous Medicaid programs to begin with. “Newly eligibles” simply aren’t going to be as big of a share there as they were in Arkansas.

To put this differently, there were an estimated 218,000 newly eligible folk to be enrolled in Medicaid in Arkansas — people who made less than 138 percent of the poverty level. That’s 600 percent of the previously eligible 36,000 adults — a massive expansion (although remember that adults are only a portion of the total people eligible for Medicaid). Therefore, we’d expect newly eligibles to be a large share of the October/November enrollment.

The state of New York, by contrast, has seven times the total population, but the expansion of Medicaid actually created fewer newly eligible adults: 170,000 newly eligible adults. Given that there were 641,000 previously eligible adults, we’d expect “newly eligibles” to be a relatively small portion of enrollment on October and November.

It’s very reasonable to assume that Arkansas’s “44 percent” is the upper boundary of the share of Medicaid enrollees in October/November that were newly eligible. How much lower is the rate for states that undertook the expansion? It’s tough to say, though again, given the base line in states like New York and California, it is almost certainly quite a bit lower. We doubled my initial estimate to get to 400,000, which I thought was being generous to the administration. Let’s say here that we halve our estimate. There’s actually something to be said for this approach. Among adults, new enrollees in Arkansas are eventually expected to make up 600 percent of the population, vis-à-vis previously eligible adults. But in the average state expanding Medicaid, weighted by population, new enrollees are eventually expected to make up a little more than half that share, about 350 percent of the population. So if newly eligible enrollees account for 44 percent of the October/November enrollees in Arkansas, 22 percent in the expansion states as a whole seems like a reasonable — if imperfect — estimate (especially after we account for Arkansas’ aggressive outreach).

So around 400,000 seems like a reasonable number to use here. This is still a significant expansion of coverage, and I suspect this number will grow considerably as the exchanges continue to improve and as we reach the deadline for the individual mandate. But it’s nevertheless well below the number the administration is suggesting.

RealClearPolitics – Articles

A Second Look at Medicaid Enrollment Numbers

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

U.S. delays online health insurance enrollment for small businesses

A man looks over the Affordable Care Act (commonly known as Obamacare) signup page on the HealthCare.gov website in New York in this October 2, 2013 photo illustration.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

Reuters: Politics

U.S. delays online health insurance enrollment for small businesses