Showing posts with label Illness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Illness. Show all posts

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Death, Illness And The Theological Reasoning Behind “Creation Science”


Pic: Mycota (PD)

Pic: Mycota (PD)



Here is what it is in a nutshell: Fear of death. Which is actually a biggie. I mean you can scoff at it when you are in your 20′s and in perfect health, but if you or a loved one has terminal cancer, for example, it tends to occupy your thoughts.


When faced with death, people really want to know if there is anything on the other side, and if there is then it’s hopefully something pleasant; even heavenly.


The way Christians traditionally worked this out is that death is un-natural. God is love, yet for some reason, perfectly nice relatives and friends are periodically taken from us sometimes, after experiencing protracted periods of horrible pain. The reason for this, theologically, is that death is a judgement; a punishment for sin. God, in his righteousness, had to punish sin but he felt bad about it. He felt so bad about it that he decided to punish himself instead on our behalf, so that we wouldn’t have to suffer and die. So if you accept this sacrifice,you will still die, but at some later point,you will be brought back to life and there will be no more tears.


I’m not really trying to be crass, because suffering and death is no joke to me. I think any means people have to get through it and be at peace is a huge blessing.


2000 years of tradition goes a long way in helping people through this process. Hospitals, military bases, any place where there is a lot of dying going on are filled With chaplains and various clergy working to bring peace to people in their suffering. I have experienced this first-hand, and the comfort this tradition brings to people is a real and tangible thing. I don’t pooh pooh it at all, because in the dying process, being at peace is much preferred to writhing in physical (as well as existential) pain.


Now, you maybe wondering, what if anything, does the need for a belief in dinosaurs frolicking alongside humans possibly have to do with this?


I really feel like the vast majority of Christians aren’t Theologically concerned about dinosaurs, or wouldn’t be if not for certain literal minded people like Ken Ham, founder of “Answers In Genesis” and the Creation Museum


Taken extremely literally, the whole “substitutionary atonement” salvation scheme does have a monkey wrench thrown into it by evolutionary biology, as it is currently understood. The reason is because in the course of evolution, and the huge stretches of time involved, there have been millions and millions of generations of living things. In other words, millions and millions of deaths. Things have been living and dying from the beginning, and there was death long before there were human beings by millions of years. In light of this it makes no logical sense that physical death could be a judgement for human sin, and that opens up once again the whole question of why do people die, why does it suck so bad, and what if anything is on the other side?


In light of evolutionary biology, many of these tried and true theological answers fail – at least in an extremely literal sense. I will hasten to add, however, that there are different schools of thought in soteriology (the study of salvation) besides the substitutionary atonement such as “Christus Victor” but delving into that is beyond the scope of this essay.


Let’s just say that for the most part evolutionary biology, and modern geology put fundamentalists on very shaky ground, theologically speaking. The Creation Science museum is essentially ahuge exercise in rationalization and wishful thinking. Its all borne from insecurity on a monumental scale. Ham and his associates have chosen to prove (to themselves) that the Garden of Eden was an historical place where literally, all the living species that ever existed, once lived, but with no predation or physical death, or suffering of any kind.


What is at stake for them is that if they can’t prove this story as being literally true, they have no answers for why people die and no assurance that anything pleasant awaits them on the other side. They are instead faced with their own annihilation and the annihilation of their loved ones.


Yet for many people Christianity (and Science) still seems to work for them.


I recently lost my dad. He was an intelligent person who admired science and scientists, yet as he lay in hospice he was very much comforted by visits from Catholic priests and nuns,  and by praying and receiving communion. In fact, he would invite any chaplain or clergy into his room who offered to pray, whether they were Catholic, Protestant, Fundamentalist Christian or completely non-denominational.


I think that in the end he chose to go with the Catholics cuts to the heart of the difference between Roman Catholics and Protestants, especially fundamentalists. Fundamentalists are, in fact, Protestants, among Protestants. The Reformation itself was is in some ways a working out of a type of extreme literal-mindedness, or over-rationality. It’s the idea that as human beings, nothing is beyond our grasp of (rational) understanding. I believe that this is what led to the type of materialism Fundamentalists now pit themselves against.


You don’t see Roman Catholics debating evolutionists because – at least officially – the Roman Catholic Church has no beef with evolution. Creation Science is not taught in Catholic schools. To Roman Catholics these big questions are shrouded in mystery. Its more mystical. Some things are beyond us, yet there is reassurance that God loves and takes care of us.


Moving beyond contemporary and historical scandals and political squabbles, many of them rightly seen as horrible, the Roman Catholic Church is a very big Church. It is very broad based and diverse in its traditions. Within this diversity there are tie-ins to other mystical, even non-dual traditions, such as Buddhism.


The non-dual answer for death is that part of us is consciousness itself, and it is this best part of us, the only real part of us, lives on.


As my Dad lay in his hospital bed, barely able to speak, but still very aware, he was visited again by a particular Franciscan nun, with whom he had developed a strong connection. She told him that he did not need words to pray, and that he only needed to breath in and out: That each breath was a giving of thanks to God.


“Its so simple,” my father said.


In his last few days as he breathed in and out, there was a tangible peace in the room and all that he had left was his Love. I really feel that in that sense he lives on.




disinformation



Death, Illness And The Theological Reasoning Behind “Creation Science”

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

How Did D.C. Navy Yard Gunman Get Security Clearance While Being Treated by VA for Mental Illness?



A gunman opened fire at a naval base in Washington, D.C., on Monday, killing 12 people and wounding several others before dying in a shootout with police. The shooter has been identified as Aaron Alexis, a 34-year-old former Navy Reservist who had been arrested at least twice in the past for shooting-related incidents, but who got security clearance to enter the Washington Navy Yard. Alexis was discharged from the Navy Reserve in 2011 following what officials termed a “pattern of misbehavior.” We speak to AP reporters Matt Apuzzo and Adam Goldman who reveal Alexis was treated by doctors within the Veterans Administration for serious mental illness, including “hearing voices.”



TRANSCRIPT:



This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.



Aaron Maté: Well, thirteen people died when a former Navy reservist opened fire on a naval base and Washington, D.C. on Monday, killing twelve people and wounding several others before dying in a shootout with police. The gunman had been identified as Aaron Alexis, a 34-year-old who have been arrested at least twice in the past for shooting related incidents, but, who got security clearance to enter the Washington Navy Yard. Alexis was discharged from the Navy reserve in 2011, following what officials termed a pattern of misbehavior. The Associated Press has just reported Alexis was treated by the VA for serious mental illness including hearing voices.


Amy Goodman : To talk more about the shooting, we are joined by Matt Apuzzo and Adam Goldman, the Pulitzer Prize-winning reporting team from the Associated Press. They cowrote the new book, “Enemies Within: Inside the NYPD’s Secret Spying Unit and Bin Laden’s Final Plot Against America.” We will talk about the book in a minute. But first, to the shooting. Matt Appuzo, Adam Goldman, welcome. Matt, start with what do you know, the report you’re putting out today?


Matt Appuzo: Well, the AP newsletter just moved a few minutes ago that said that Alexis had been treated relatively recently, in recent months, for a host of mental issues at the VA, hearing voices was kind of the catchall. I think the question obviously is going to be, how far along was he in the treatment? What were they seeing in the medical record? What were they seeing in his file? And could that have pulled clearances to get in the building? At this stage, I don’t think we know the answers to those questions and I think that is what investigators are going to be trying to look for too. Were their missed opportunities like we saw at Virginia Tech with Seung Hui Cho where he shouldn’t have been able to do the things to get a hold of the guns given his mental treatment? I don’t know if that was the case here, but it is certainly something the federal government is looking at, the city government is looking at, and reporters like us are looking at.


Amy Goodman: I mean, it’s something, both having the clearance and having the guns.


Matt Appuzo: Right, and our reporter — the guns aren’t something that Adam and I focused a ton on, but our reporter in Washington, Eric Tucker, has really been trying to piece together exactly how they got the guns. We know that there was a shotgun that he used, we know that there was a handgun. Unclear whether he got the handgun from a police officer or security guard on the scene. And they are still trying to link up that AR-15 as well, as to, you know, was that his. We know it was near him. Where did he get it? You know, all those things. So I think that is what the federal government is trying to piece together. That’s what we’re still trying to piece together.


Amy Goodman: Also quite astounding, while being treated at the VA as AP is reporting for among other things, hearing voices, that he had other incidents in the past and his father saying to authorities that he perhaps suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder from helping people at 9/11. I mean, he had gun violence incidents that he was arrested for.


Matt Appuzo : Sure, and I just think, you know, we’re 24 hours into this investigation and we still haven’t figured out — the gun trace issue is always a difficult one. So, until — I think until we know how he got these guns and how the clearances went, I just don’t want to jump to conclusions about what should have happened or shouldn’t have happened. We are only 24 hours into it.


Amy Goodman: Right, and finally, Adam, that issue of mental illness and being able to have guns legally?


Adam Goldman: Yeah, that is a big issue in this country, and we see people repeatedly with mental illness obtained firearms. Newtown, Virginia Tech, and the horrific shooting in the suburb of Denver.


Amy Goodman: Well, of course we will continue to follow this issue. But now we’re going to talk about an issue you have followed for years.




Truthout Stories



How Did D.C. Navy Yard Gunman Get Security Clearance While Being Treated by VA for Mental Illness?