Showing posts with label Registration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Registration. Show all posts

Friday, March 21, 2014

Middle School Assignment: Second Amendment Requires Gun Registration

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Middle School Assignment: Second Amendment Requires Gun Registration

Saturday, January 18, 2014

Feds Deny State Bids to Tighten Voter Registration


The U.S. Election Assistance Commission found Friday that heightened proof-of-citizenship requirements likely would hinder eligible citizens from voting in federal elections, handing down a ruling that denied requests from Kansas, Arizona and Georgia to modify the registration form for their residents.


The decision came just hours before a court-imposed deadline in a lawsuit filed in federal court by Kansas and Arizona that seeks to force the commission to modify state-specific requirements for registering to vote in those states. Georgia, which has a similar voter registration law, is not part of the litigation but was included in the commission’s decision.


Those states have enacted laws requiring new voters to provide a birth certificate, passport or other proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote. People who register using the federal form only need to sign a statement, under penalty of perjury, that he or she is a U.S. citizen.


Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach has championed his state’s proof-of-citizenship law to keep non-citizens from voting, particularly those in the U.S. illegally. But critics say voter fraud is extremely rare and contend such laws suppress the vote and threaten to keep thousands of citizens from casting ballots.


Kobach said in an email that he had anticipated the adverse ruling from the commission and the states will now press their constitutional claims before the U.S. District Court in Kansas. He argues the decision is unconstitutional because it prevents Kansas and Arizona from securing their voter rolls.


“The EAC’s reasoning reflects the partisan view of the Obama Justice Department that requiring voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship at the time of registration is undesirable as a policy matter,” Kobach said. “However, the EAC has no authority to second-guess the policy decisions of the sovereign states of Kansas and Arizona.”


In its decision, the EAC found that added documentation burdens do not enhance voter participation and result in an overall decrease in registration of eligible citizens — undermining the core purpose of the National Voter Registration Act.


It cited as evidence the problems Kansas already has experienced with its own enhanced voter registration requirements. The voter registrations of 20,127 Kansans remained on hold Friday because they’ve not yet provided proof of their citizenship to election officials.


States already have other means available to enforce citizenship requirements without requiring additional information from applicants, including access to national databases of birth certificates and naturalization information, the agency noted.


Given the “paucity of evidence” provided by the states regarding noncitizens registering to vote, the new voter registration requirements enacted by the states reflect “legislative policy preferences” and are not based on any demonstrated necessity, the agency said. It also said that the heightened documentation requirements imposed by Kansas and Arizona have led to significant reductions in organized voter registration programs.


“This is a significant decision for all eligible voters underscoring the purpose of the National Voter Registration Act to remove barriers such as documentary proof of citizenship that prevent eligible citizens from registering to vote and voting,” Michelle Kanter Cohen, a lawyer representing Project Vote in the states’ lawsuit in Kansas, said in an email Saturday.


“What we have seen where these laws have been implemented in Arizona and Kansas is that tens of thousands of eligible Americans have been rejected or suspended from the voter rolls, and community voter registration drives have been significantly hampered,” Cohen said.


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June that Arizona could not refuse to accept the national voter registration form, even though people who use it aren’t required to provide citizenship documents.


Kobach has said that if he cannot get a federal court to order EAC to modify the federal registration form with state-specific requirements, he would institute — on his own authority as Kansas secretary of state — a dual registration that limits Kansans who register with the federal form to voting only in presidential, U.S. Senate and congressional races.


“We applaud the EAC’s decision to uphold this law and protect the right to vote,” said Wendy Weiser, director of the Brennan Center’s Democracy Program at NYU School of Law, which represents the League of Women Voters in the Kansas litigation. “We hope Arizona and Kansas abandon their quest to undermine federal law by making voter registration more complicated.”


© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.




Newsmax – America



Feds Deny State Bids to Tighten Voter Registration

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

HEY NEW YORK: REGISTRATION IS CONFISCATION

USA :: Gun Control   ::   Print this Article
HEY NEW YORK: REGISTRATION IS CONFISCATION
12-18-2013 8:22 pm – NY2AGrassroots.com
The SAFE Act registration deadline is fast approaching in New York State. And make no mistake: Registration is confiscation.

We are winning the information war and building a network to influence the 2014 election cycle. The number of anti-SAFE Act signs on lawns grows daily. We are scheduling community forums for January and February across the state. And the governor and his minions have come to expect us to protest his public appearances and even some of his private ones.


But there is danger ahead!


Registration will happen in two ways.


The first is that those who register their so-called “assault weapons” will NEVER be able to sell them within the borders of New York State. They will NEVER be able to bequeath them to loved ones in New York through their estate. Those weapons MUST be sold out of state or turned over to police for destruction upon their owner’s death. This went into effect the moment Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the SAFE Act on Jan. 15, 2013. An entire category of firearms, which in nearly all of the United States are considered to be “in common usage,” but are defined by certain mostly cosmetic characteristics, will be eliminated within just a couple generations. It is long-term confiscation.


The second is much more sinister. The idea that registration leads to confiscation is an oft-spoken mantra among those in the gun rights community. And it is often dismissed as paranoia by the gun control crowd.


But it is not. A precedent exists for it right here in the Empire State.


In 1967, New York City passed a long-gun registry scheme that was at first touted as a sensible gun control law. It was just $ 3 to register and promises were made that it would never lead to confiscation.


The fee to register crept up over the years and one day, by the stroke of a pen, many of those long guns were deemed illegal. Their owners were ordered to turn them over or remove them from New York City. The effects of this are still being seen today.


The really sinister part is that when the state’s enforcers have lists, going door-to-door to confiscate is not beyond the realm of possibility. And that puts both the citizens and the agents of the state at risk. It’s happening in California.


Beginning in April, New York State residents were able to register their so-called “assault weapons” with the state of New York. Residents have until April 15, 2014 to register any firearm that meets the state’s arbitrary definitions of an “assault weapon.”


Obviously, one measure of success for Cuomo’s SAFE Act is the number of people who comply with the registry.


But with no hard numbers on how many firearms possessed in the state are considered under New York law to be “assault weapons,” as well as silence from Albany on how many such weapons have been registered, it is not clear what sort of compliance rate the Cuomo Administration is seeing. However, the refusal of the state to release the registration figures in recent months, even after several FOIL requests, makes it seem very clear the overall number of registrants is low.


An early figure that circulated on the Internet in June put the registration tally at less than 400.


At a recent gathering of current and retired state police officers, the figure of 2,800 was given. This may even sound like a high number for some people who know nothing about guns or the SAFE Act. But State Police Superintendent Joseph D’Amico gave an estimate of “hundreds of thousands” of “assault weapons” possessed by the citizenry. Other estimates place this figure at more than one million.


Given the fact we are in the eighth month of possible registration the compliance rate is clearly pitifully low. Good!


That’s exactly what we want.


And it’s entirely plausible that hundreds – if not more than half – of the registered “assault weapons” belong to law enforcement.


It is also known that at least one police agency – a big one – requires its members to register their “assault weapons.”


Assemblyman Steve McLaughlin, a Civil Rights champion, speaking a few weeks ago on WGY-810 AM, said state police rank-and-file were ordered to register their personally-owned firearms.


There were more than 4,600 troopers in the New York State police in 2007.


From personal experience, we have seen a large percentage of personal semi-automatic rifle ownership among state troopers. The state police only recently began purchasing larger numbers of AR-15s for use by troopers in their official duties. For decades, many troopers and other law enforcement officers have bought their own long guns for duty and personal use.


When Canada enacted its ill-fated firearms registry scheme, the country saw a rush in the final few weeks before the registration deadline. It would be foolish for us not to expect a similar rush this coming March and April.


We must urge non-compliance with the gun registry at every opportunity!


When the SAFE Act was passed there were very few things gun owners could do to modify their rifles in order to avoid having to comply with the registry. But since then, numerous firearms and firearms accessories manufacturing firms have come out with a myriad of products. They are designed to weave around the new gun control laws passed in several states this year, including New York, and this is a testament to American ingenuity.


Some of NY2A’s partner groups are not advocating any modifications to avoid the state’s arbitrary “assault weapons” definition. They choose to advocate a purer form of non-compliance.


We respect and support those groups.


We also understand there are many gun owners in the state who are not willing to break the law or practice civil disobedience. While we wish that more New Yorkers were willing to engage in civil disobedience, we recognize that many who are opposed to the SAFE Act will seek the path of least resistance, while hanging onto as much of their Second Amendment right as they can.


Options to defeat the “assault weapons” registry include, but are not limited to:


open defiance,
quiet defiance,
hiding firearms,
storing firearms out of state and
modifying firearms so they don’t meet the state’s definition of an “assault weapon.”


NY2A was founded as an umbrella coalition to bring in the widest possible range of groups and individuals from across the state to defeat the SAFE Act. We garner our support from the full range of gun owners: Democrat, Republican, liberal, conservative and independent. For that reason, we will not abandon those gun owners who will not break the law, nor those who will stand in open or quiet defiance of the law.


We need each other now more than ever.


Therefore, we feel a duty to educate people on all of their options but stop short of advocating a specific course of action. We are all individuals and we all must make our own personal decisions as the registration deadline approaches.


However, we will stand united in non-compliance of the assault weapons registry and the other heinous provisions of the SAFE Act.


We are hopeful the state and federal courts overseeing several legal challenges to the SAFE Act will eventually issue injunctions and ultimately rule the major provisions of the law to be unconstitutional. We are also hopeful we can continue to apply political pressure in Albany.


But until that day when our Civil Rights are validated in court or through legislative repeal, we must weather this storm. And we must defeat Cuomo and the gang of thugs who usurped our Civil Rights by not complying with their “assault weapons” registry.


————————
SOURCE: http://www.ny2agrassroots.com/hey-ny-registration-is-confiscation/




Liberty News online



HEY NEW YORK: REGISTRATION IS CONFISCATION

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Registration Unknown, Martin Luther King Was Likely Republican

With President Barack Obama joined at the Lincoln Memorial last Wednesday by fellow former Democratic Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton to commemorate Dr. Martin Luther King’s speech 50 years ago, a few political observers pose the question, “Was King actually a Republican?”

It is impossible to know whether King was Democrat, Republican, or independent. His home state of Georgia did not have registration by party, so allegiance to a political party depended on which primaries a voter chose to cast a ballot in.


The Atlanta pastor kept this to himself. His choice of primaries to vote in is not known and, as the intellectual force the civil rights cause, King carefully avoided embracing political candidates.


But there is some evidence as to where his party leanings were, including the observations of the Republican who was Martin Luther King’s congressman.


“I believe Dr. King was a Republican,” Fletcher Thompson, who represented the Atlanta area in Congress from 1966-72, told Newsmax. “Most of the blacks in the late 1950s and at least up to 1960 were Republican. Our party was sympathetic to them and the Democrats were the ones enforcing ‘Jim Crow’ laws and segregation.”


Thompson, who never personally met King, recalled how C.A. Scott, publisher of the Atlanta World — the only newspaper in Georgia owned by blacks — and a close associate of King’s, “was a Republican and ‘The World’ always endorsed me when I ran for Congress.”


With the 1960 presidential campaign approaching, New York Times political reporter Tom Wicker noted that “the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. had volunteered to lead a voter registration drive among blacks, which King though would produce many new Republican voters.”


As to King’s favorite candidate, “It is open secret among many Negroes that the Rev. Martin Luther King, if he were to speak out on the subject, would probably indicate a preference for [Republican Richard] Nixon over [Democratic nominee John] Kennedy,” The Reporter magazine noted in October 1960.


But Republican hopes of major gains among black voters in 1960 were dashed on October 19, when King was sentenced to four months in Reidsville (Ga.) Penitentiary for violating probation after he was sentenced for driving with an expired license and tags a month before.


Fearing for the minister’s life once imprisoned, family and friends pleaded with both major party candidates for help.


Nixon felt King was getting “a bum rap,” but he said no to King supporters — including baseball great Jackie Robinson — because he felt “it would be completely improper for me or another other lawyer to call the judge.”


In contrast, Kennedy called King’s wife Coretta and offered to do anything he could for her. Working quietly with Georgia Democratic Gov. Ernest Vandiver, the candidate and campaign manager arranged for the minister to be released from jail.


Dr. King’s pastor-father “Daddy” King told reporters, “I had expected to vote against Sen. Kennedy because of his religion. But now he can be my president, Catholic or whatever he is. It took courage to call my daughter-in-law at a time like this. I’ve got all my votes and I’ve got a suitcase and I’m going up there and dump them in [Kennedy"s] lap.”


So he did. Some 63 percent of black voters went for Kennedy and his actions on behalf of King are considered one of the factors in winning one of the closest presidential elections in history.


As Presidents Kennedy and later Lyndon Johnson embraced the civil rights cause, King was identified increasingly with the Democratic Party, although he maintained his policy of not endorsing candidates.


Republican orators increasingly denounced him, noting the clergyman’s later embrace of the anti-Vietnam War movement and his friendship with the far left, notably King’s close friend and advisor Stanley Levison, a former member of the Communist Party of the U.S.


One who would not denounce him was Fletcher Thompson. He recalled to Newsmax how, when serving on the House Committee on Un-American Activities, a colleague asked if he wanted to see the FBI file delineating King’s ties to Levison and other controversial figures.


“I told him no,” said Thompson. “I looked at Dr. King fighting for civil rights as I would someone swimming alone in the ocean. When someone comes along in a lifeboat and reaches out, he’s not going to ask if he is, or was, a Communist.”


John Gizzi is chief political columnist and White House correspondent for Newsmax.


© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Registration Unknown, Martin Luther King Was Likely Republican

Friday, May 17, 2013

Bitcoin 2013: Registration


bitcoin, 2013:, registration, ,

Bitcoin 2013 Registration




Bitcoin 2013 is just getting underway and it’s already staring to look interesting.


In line for my registration, I spoke with entrepreneurs from Los Angeles, New York, and somewhere in Idaho so the representation seems fairly diverse. 


I’m currently listening to Free Talk Radio Live do their broadcast from a stage in the convention center where the show is doing a special QA program with different Bitcoin startups. The current interviewee is from The Bitcoin store which apparently is an online market place that deals exclusively in Bitcoin.


Thanks to Saitoshi Dice, I”ll be enjoying free wifi all weekend long so check back often for updates!




PolicyMic



Bitcoin 2013: Registration