Showing posts with label engagement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label engagement. Show all posts

Saturday, February 1, 2014

Engagement with China is Good and Other Lies – Part II



mussolini




After WW2, world leaders did a sense check to see what had gone wrong. They wanted to understand how dictatorships evolved and how best to stop Hitlers and Mussolinis from occurring. Eventually it was decided that one of the best ways to stop a dictatorship was to beat it economically. As a result, sanctions were imposed on countries who failed to toe the line.


Among others, the Soviet Union was cast out due to its communist beliefs. Communism was an anathema to democracy and thus the biggest threat to freedom. The way to beat this threat was by isolation. Absent access to western markets, the Soviets would bleed money and crash, which is eventually what happened.


The same strategy has been used against dictatorships across the globe and the results have been promising. By withholding access to markets and thus wealth, the people grow disillusioned with governments and either demand or force change. As a result, dictatorial regimes have been defeated and dictatorial regimes have mostly been curtailed (Competitive Authoritarianism – Levitsky/Way).


The Soviets were demonized for doing the exact same things that communist China of today has done and continues to do:


–> Genocide – check


China’s ex leader/president – Hu Jintao has been convicted of crimes against humanity in Spanish court. The Madrid-based Tibetan Support Committee originally filed a lawsuit against then-President Hu in 2006, alleging that the Chinese Communist Party leader was responsible for the torture and repression of the Tibetan people.


–> Violent repression of religion – check


–> Violent repression of democracy – check


China has even imprisoned the 10-year-old daughter of a man calling for democracy.


–> Intolerance of free speech – check


–> No rule of law – check


China has done this and so much more, but little is done about it. Beijing enjoys unfettered access to our markets, our technology and our secrets while the former Soviets were demonized. The Soviet Union fell and China is growing, and things do not look good for the West.


People like Henry Kissinger were only too willing to sell us down the river. He knew that Americans possess two crucial weaknesses which he could exploit for his own good – naivete/ignorance and greed. He opened the Pandora’s box and look what has happened. China is not changing.


James Mann posited that China may not change. As a matter of fact, he wrote a book claiming as much.


“What if China manages to continue on its current economic path, yet its political system does not change in any fundamental way? What if, twenty-five or thirty years from now, a wealthier, more powerful China continues to be run by a one-party regime that still represses organized political dissent much as it does today, while at the same time China is also open to the outside world and, indeed, is deeply intertwined with the rest of the world through trade, investment and other economic ties? Everyone assumes that the Chinese political system is going to open up—but what if it doesn’t? What if, in other words, China becomes fully integrated into the world’s economy, yet it remains also entirely undemocratic?”Sinocism




aleksandr solzhenitsyn




Resistant to Change


He spelled out in careful detail why Beijing may resist change and what the impact would be, and he was right, but we did not listen. We are on a collision course with China because of this and things are not getting better.


Alexsandr Solzhenitsyn knew only too well how naive and accepting Americans are (Warning to the West by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (Sep 1, 1986). He was right when he wrote that this innocence would be our demise. His mistake was in concluding that the Soviets would bury us, he too failed to account for China. He hypothesized that the Soviet Union would exploit our open nature, infiltrate and destroy us. Fortunately for us, we destroyed the Soviets instead.


Mr. Solzhenitsyn claimed that we are an accepting people, slow to anger and easily deceived. He said it was this characteristic which had led to our greatness but would also be our downfall. (To understand how communism works, read Warning to the West by Solzhenitsyn. Many of his fears about our engagement with the Soviet Union are coming to fruition with China.)


He knew all too well that the success of the former USSR was based on our destruction. Mutual cohabitation was impossible due to the vast differences in beliefs. All that we cherish they sought to destroy and vice-versa – fortunately for us the USSR fell.


It is mystifying how pound-for-pound China of today is equal to or worse than the Soviet Union, and yet it still gets a free pass. We sell out our freedoms in order to earn a few pennies. We allow communists of Beijing to study at Harvard, and the trigger men of Tienenman are welcomed by the White House. We also allow Chinese ‘spies’ free access to our military, government, critical infrastructure and technological future. How naive we are.




starbucks




Will China Change?


With profit and losses hinging on sales from China, mega corporations are only too willing to convince us that engagement is the key. “China will change”, they claim, “Democracy is around the corner” and “It only takes time, but China will come around”.


China’s new general secretary of the communist party, head of the military and leader has shown that during his reign no such thing will happen. He is jailing writers, quashing dissent and rolling up the welcome mat. Comrade Xi Jinping, as he is known on the news here, has glorified the Korean war and threatened Americans at every turn. These facts are conveniently swept under the rug, after all, Apple needs to meet its earnings projections and Starbucks is teaching its employees Mandarin. It would seem as if comrade Xi et al need not worry about storming our shores, we have raised the white flag already.


Rather than take a hard look at China and making tough choices, we complain that “everything is made there” and “what can I do about this anyway?”


I don’t have the answers, but the least we could do is try to decrease our China footprint. How about we take a look at Made in the USA or Americans Working. According to Roger Simmermaker, the Central Florida author of How Americans Can Buy American, there still are many American companies making things.


We conjecture that Chinese politicians have motivation to use cross-listing for pursuing national or private agendas (e.g., showcasing China’s economic power or fulfilling politicians’ self-interests). Consequently, we hypothesize that these agendas will induce the politicians to choose protected firms or politically connected firms to cross-list on overseas stock exchanges.




made in the usa




What Are Our Options?


Another option is to take a look at your stock portfolio and divest yourselves of companies such as PetroChina Company Limited (PTR), China Mobile (Hong Kong) Ltd. (CHL) and China Unicom (CHU); after all, these are state-owned-enterprises (SOE’s) which are operated by the communist party in Beijing.


Far from being free of the tentacles of a one party state, they support it. Each cent we plug into such companies goes directly into the pockets of the same government which ran the Soviet Union. The same government which has said that Beijing and Washington cannot cohabitate peacefully. Why in the world would we give American green backs to such a system?


If this is too ephemeral, then how about reconsidering buying stock in Chinese companies going IPO in America? Not only do we send cash to their economy and create jobs for the Chinese, but we also send a message, “yes America is for sale”. And even if this is too much to take then how about not buying their stock because so much of it is toxic.


The Chinese do not play by the rules. They refuse to allow American oversight on stock sold in our land and are frequently fraught with malfeasance and fraud. Why do we support things such as this?


The answers to that question are greed and ignorance. Corporations seek to maximize profits, it’s their reason to be. We, on the other hand, have different needs. I would suggest that safety, security and a life free of the threat of nuclear war are some good goals. By getting informed we can make wise choices, get in touch with our political leaders and minimize the China threat. Alternatively, we can do nothing and see what happens.



References & Image Credits:
(1) Mussolini
(2) Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
(3) pierofix via Compfight cc
(4) sygyzy via photopin cc




*****

Follow WC on Google+. Follow us @TopSecretwriter, Facebook or Google+ Originally published on TopSecretWriters.com







Top Secret Writers



Engagement with China is Good and Other Lies – Part II

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

VIDEO: Kim Kardashian & Kanye West Are Officially Engaged!







Kim Kardashian & Kanye West Are Officially Engaged!













Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.







To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.







VIDEO: Kim Kardashian & Kanye West Are Officially Engaged!

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Crowdsourcing Disasters and Social Engagement Multiplied


Shayne Adamski
August 05, 2013
11:30 AM EDT




Ed Note: This is a cross post from fema.gov. You can find the original post here.


Crowdsourcing disasters. New social media sites. Centralized places to get info. Our digital team at FEMA has been busy launching a number of new tools to help the public and our partners to prepare for, respond to and recover from disasters. Here’s a quick rundown of the new resources:


How does this help you be a part of the emergency management team? Watch this demo from Administrator Fugate as he walks through all the new tools and resources you can take advantage of:



Before a disaster, you can download the FEMA App and use the interactive emergency kit checklist and learn what to do during specific hazards. And if you find yourself in a situation, where you need a refresher, you can still pull up the safety info in the app, even if you don’t have a cellular or wifi connection.


After a disaster, if you’re not placing yourself in harm’s way, you can use the Disaster Reporter feature in the FEMA App and take a photo of the disaster area and upload it to us (just make sure the GPS function is turned on). This includes all types of disasters, not just Federal disasters.


We’ll review the photo submissions to ensure: (1) it is disaster-related, (2) not spam, and (3) there are no privacy issues. And then all approved content is posted on a public map. It’s pretty simple.


We’re really excited about this new feature, because it gives all stakeholders in a disaster area the ability to upload information to a centralized place, allowing all emergency managers to view the information. Since we’re using the FEMA GeoPlatform for our mapping interface the content can be shared on other maps and sites, using what techies refer to as an API (Application Programming Interface).


Speaking of centralized places to view information, the Social Hub is where all stakeholders can go to view tweets from trusted emergency managers. The great thing about the Social Hub is we can change the information we’re displaying on the fly. When we launched the Social Hub on Monday, July 29, we were displaying tweets from accounts in Hawaii, because we were monitoring Tropical Storm Flossie.


When the storm dissipated, we transitioned to displaying local National Weather Service tweets, both in a scrolling format and on a map. As we know, more and more people are going mobile with their devices (phones and tablets), so we also created a Social Hub on our mobile site.


Finally, we recently launched two new channels to better engage FEMA’s digital audience: the FEMA LinkedIn page and the U.S. Fire Administration Facebook page. On LinkedIn, look for job listings, stories about what a “day in the life” looks like at FEMA, and other training resources. And if you “Like” the U.S. Fire Administration Facebook page, you’ll receive lots of stories, resources, and tips for assisting fire departments or firefighters.


When I testified on Capitol Hill on Social Media and Emergency Management last month, I said that we’re always looking at how we can expand our existing digital and social products. As you can imagine, we’re excited about these new tools and we’re looking forward to feedback.


Kick the tires as they say and let us know what you think.


Shayne Adamski is the Senior Manager of Digital Engagement at FEMA


Related Topics: Technology, Hawaii



White House.gov Blog Feed



Crowdsourcing Disasters and Social Engagement Multiplied

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

A Guide To Purchasing Your Engagement Ring

=When shopping for an engagement ring (perhaps one of life\’s most important major purchases) there are a number of factors to consider. This handy guide should go some way towards helping you make an informed decision as we take you through the numerous options available and explain them in unpatronising detail. When selecting the diamond (or diamonds) for your engagement ring the major factors you\’ll need to take into account are the carat weight, colour, clarity, cut and shape of the diamond.

The Carat rating of a diamond basically refers to its weight, not its size, as some people wrongly believe. Carats are graded on a point system with 3 carats equalling 300 points, using this as a litmus test we can see that a 1-carat diamond is 100 points and a quarter carat diamond is 25 points. Clarity refers to how pure the diamond is in terms of inclusions and blemishes with flawless diamonds obviously worth more than noticeably flawed ones. The Colour meanwhile is rather self-explanatory, the more internal colouring there is on a diamond, the less pure it is and therefore the less it is worth. A diamonds colour and clarity are both graded on specific scales.

The Cut of the diamond is in deference to how well the diamond cutter carves the diamond and how that effects the finish of the diamond, the way it\’s angles match up and the general aesthetics of it including how well it refracts light. And finally the Shape refers to the outward appearance of the diamond, which can be shaped by a skilled cutter into any number of designs. The round diamond is the most expensive and popular but other less conventional shapes like the heart and the marquise are also popular.

Of course it\’s not just the diamond itself you have to think about when buying your engagement ring, the band itself and the way it compliments the diamond is of almost equal importance. The Style of your engagement ring can be customised into one of 3 main options. The most popular and conventional option is the \’solitaire\’, which sees a single diamond set into a sparse ring whereas for more elaborate tastes there are the \’trilogy\’ and \’shoulder-set\’ options to consider. The trilogy sets 3 similarly sized diamonds into a ring and the shoulder set compliments the main diamond with a dozen tiny ones studded around the ring.

Finally the way your diamond sets into your engagement ring needs to be considered with your options here being (mercifully) a little more limited. The basic \’claw\’ option refers to the fine metal clasps that hold the diamond into the ring and they come in 3, 4 or 6 claw options. The rub-over setting meanwhile sets the diamond into your engagement ring via a rim of fine protective metal that wraps around the stone. Other factors such as the type of metal used on the band (platinum, gold or palladium) also need to be taken into consideration but the diamond itself is of prime importance and with this guide you should have no difficulty in finding the right one for your fianc.

If you want know more about engagement rings be sure to visit Diamonds N Diamonds jewellery experts.


A Guide To Purchasing Your Engagement Ring