Showing posts with label followed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label followed. Show all posts

Sunday, April 6, 2014

Rare Space Events: Mars, Earth and Sun Will Align, Followed by the First of a Lunar Eclipse Tetrad

At Hey WTF? News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Hey WTF? News and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Hey WTF? News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Hey WTF? News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Hey WTF? News.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Hey WTF? News and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Hey WTF? News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Hey WTF? News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Hey WTF? News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Rare Space Events: Mars, Earth and Sun Will Align, Followed by the First of a Lunar Eclipse Tetrad

Friday, January 10, 2014

Damage-control worries followed NJ lane closings



(AP) — Officials squabbled over media leaks and worried about bad publicity in the days after lane closings near the George Washington Bridge caused huge traffic jams that now appear to have been politically orchestrated by a member of Gov. Chris Christie’s administration and key allies, documents released Friday show.


In the documents, officials appointed by Christie seemed more concerned about the political fallout than the effects of the gridlock in the town of Fort Lee during four mornings in September.


The thousands of pages were released by a New Jersey legislative committee investigating the scandal, which could haunt Christie’s expected run for president in 2016. The documents mostly involve the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the agency that runs the bridge.


Lawmakers are looking into allegations that Christie loyalists engineered the tie-ups to punish the Democratic mayor of Fort Lee for not endorsing Christie for re-election.


The documents show that the traffic mess created tension between New York and New Jersey appointees at the Port Authority, with the New York side angrily countermanding the lane closings.


In the correspondence, Port Authority chairman David Samson, a Christie appointee, suggested that the authority’s executive director, Patrick Foye, who was appointed by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, had leaked to a reporter an internal memo ordering an end to the lane closings.


Samson called that possibility “very unfortunate for NY/NJ relations.”


On Thursday, Christie moved to contain the damage from the scandal, firing his deputy chief of staff, cutting ties to one of his chief political advisers and apologizing for the traffic jams. Two Christie appointees at the Port Authority resigned last month as the scandal unfolded.


Christie has denied any involvement in the lane closings, and the two batches of documents released on Wednesday and Friday do not implicate him.


The latest documents contain several emails from Port Authority media relations staff to higher-ups reporting on calls from reporters with questions about the closings. The agency did not respond to those calls.


It was Foye’s Sept. 13 email that ordered the lanes reopened that generated deep discussion. In it, Foye called the decision to close the lanes “abusive” and added, “I believe this hasty and ill-advised decision violates federal law.”


Bill Baroni, the Christie-appointed deputy director who has since resigned, forwarded a copy of the angry email to Christie’s scheduling secretary.


Later that morning, Baroni emailed Foye: “I am on my way to office to discuss. There can be no public discourse.”


Foye responded: “Bill that’s precisely the problem: there has been no public discourse on this.”


Baroni later authorized a statement for reporters explaining that the closings were part of a traffic study.


In recent weeks, there have been questions about the whether the closings were part of a legitimate study.


Christie himself said on Thursday: “I don’t know whether this was a traffic study that then morphed into a political vendetta or a political vendetta that morphed into a traffic study.”


The newly released documents show that there was, in fact, a traffic study that was done, or at least a preliminary one. There were emails from Port Authority contractors in late August on the mechanics and timing of a study.


Two versions of a study turned up in the documents — one was six pages and the other 16. Both were dated Sept. 12, the day before the lanes reopened.


The documents include study findings that Baroni gave to lawmakers at a hearing last year: When the lanes were closed, the main bridge traffic moved a bit faster, but local traffic had major delays.


Michael Cassidy, a University of California-Berkeley engineering professor who occasionally works with the California Department of Transportation, told The Associated Press that the preliminary study appears to be a legitimate internal report of the sort transportation officials often circulate among themselves.


“It could well be a good-faith effort, if not the finest in the annals. I cannot say this is not a study,” he said. “You wouldn’t want to publish it in an academic journal.”


How to deal with the fallout from the traffic jams became an issue.


In an Oct. 9 email exchange under the subject “morning clips,” Philippe Danielides, a senior adviser at the Port Authority, asked David Wildstein, a Christie appointee at the agency who has since resigned, “Has any thought been given to writing an op-ed or providing a statement about the GWB study? Or is the plan just to hunker down and grit our way through it?”


“Yes and yes,” Wildstein replied.


In a Sept. 17 email, Christie spokesman Michael Drewniak appears to send Wildstein a response to be sent to a reporter writing about the lane closings. “Traffic studies or pilots are done all the time,” he wrote. “They’re temporary, and if they’re not done, how can the effectiveness of a new approach be tested?”


The documents also showed confusion from some Port Authority employees as the closings were starting.


One employee asked, “What is driving this?” Another responded that he was wondering the same thing: “It seems like we are punishing all for the sake of a few.”


And another employee passed along a complaint from a woman who said that her husband, who had been out of work for more than a year, was 40 minutes late for a job interview because of the tie-ups.


One Port Authority police officer went searching for answers.


“The undersigned inquired if this is a permanent plan or temporary,” Capt. Darcy Licorish wrote in an email recounting her meeting with the bridge manager. “The manager could not supply an answer to that or other questions. Inquiry was also made as to the notifications of the township. No answers could be supplied.”


___


AP reporters David Porter and Katie Zezima in Newark, Jim Fitzgerald in White Plains, N.Y. and Cara Anna in New York contributed to this report.


Associated Press



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | RFID | Amazon Affiliate

Top Headlines

Damage-control worries followed NJ lane closings

Friday, October 25, 2013

Brain drain: Funding and industry leave America, followed by top minds



Patrick Henningsen is a writer, investigative journalist, and filmmaker and founder of the news website 21stCentury Wire.com.




Published time: October 25, 2013 15:58

Job seekers wait in front of the training offices of Local Union 46, the union representing metallic lathers and reinforcing ironworkers, in the Queens borough of New York (Reuters/Keith Bedford)


The US government spending crisis has caused visible pain for research and innovation in America. Already this year, billions of dollars in federal cuts due to sequestration has affected federal grants for scientific research.


But this problem is only the tip of a much bigger problem facing the redundant superpower.


Two fundamental building blocks for any modern technological, progressive economy are discovery research and scientific investigation. By their nature, these two pursuits carry a much slower return on the investment. In the past, the US could afford to be patient because its thriving industrial sector was a magnet for the word’s talent and investment – which is why successive governments have routinely placed their dollars there. That engine which used to power the US juggernaut has been disassembled and shipped overseas.


Politicians will certainly blame the current crisis in academia on sequestration and partisan feuds over federal budgets, but that’s only part of the story. Cuts are not only consigned to federal budgets. According to a report by the National Science Foundation, States have also cut funds for public research universities by 20 percent, in constant dollars, between 2002 and 2010. If money is cut back, that means researchers are laid off, programs are frozen, and labs are closed. As a result, talent will begin to look abroad for better opportunities.


According to a recent interview by RT with Benjamin Corb, a public affairs director for the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB), indicators for a ‘brain drain’ from the US are already starting to manifest throughout higher education.


 “As a survey that we put together over the summer shows, one in five American scientists are considering leaving the country for better funding opportunities outside our borders,” he said.


The ASBMB survey also found that half the researchers had either laid off, or were expecting to lay off staff due to federal budget cuts. This includes letting go of technical staff, but more crucially it’s hurting the future crop of highly skilled experts – graduate, PhD, postdoctoral and resident trainees. It’s becoming a noticeable issue, even for some of the country’s, if not the world’s, perennially top higher education institutions like Harvard and the University of Chicago medical schools, as well as the New York State University system, to name only a few. 


A job seeker sleeps in a lawn chair as he waits in front of the training offices of Local Union 46, a union representing metallic lathers and reinforcing ironworkers, in the Queens borough of New York (Reuters/Keith Bedford)  


Holding on to the best and the brightest which make up this fundamental basis for maintaining a leading science and tech economy is not impossible without steady growth in funding and investment in research institutions. If you lose the edge in research, then it’s only a question of time before the corporate investment which funds the next stage – commercial research and development, begins to migrate off shore too.


In 2010, President Obama delivered a typical glorious speech on this topic stating, “Our future depends on reaffirming America’s role as the world’s engine of scientific discovery and technical innovation.”


The key word here was ‘reaffirm’, implying that the US has already been knocked off its perch. This is not a problem which any President can rightly claim to fix. Aggressive off-shoring policies over the last four US administrations has seen whole industries disappear from America, and so too will the graduates, following the work in an age of globalization. Why produce legions of engineering graduates in the US when there are no engineering jobs to fill?


But it’s not just across the board cuts in federal funding that are pushing this trend of a ‘brain drain’ from American shores. A larger picture reveals an almost perfect storm – other established economic and political trends which have made for optimum conditions for decline in scientific and technological eminence.


Falling prospects in a zero growth economy


Where America single-handedly dominated the global technology and innovation scene for the better part of a century, new competition has already begun mushrooming outside of the US. Unfortunately, investment and talent follows opportunity. So how did the US lose its edge?


Put aside for one moment, the delusional wisdom of Washington DC and the excesses of Wall Street. The rest of the world now refers to America as a “mature economy”, which you can translate as meaning: zero growth. In economic terms, zero growth = zero investment, which in turn means zero future in an economy dominated by rent seekers. Nearly two decades of breakneck federal spending, and bloated budgets, coupled with the feverish outsourcing of manufacturing in America to the Far East and Latin America, swelling ranks of illegal immigrants – has forced factors which are counterproductive to an advanced competitive economy – high unemployment, and high inflation. High costs of goods and services, high costs of education, high costs of fuel and a high cost of living means that America is no longer competitive.


The writing has been on the wall for a while. What politician didn’t know, or care to know during the naughty 1990s, is that you cannot support a vibrant scientific commercial research and development (R & D) sector without the actual industrial sector that’s meant to nurture it. Modern transnational corporations have no allegiance to flag anymore, only to shareholder dividends. The US Congress and Senate are no different, as most of them amass their personal fortunes while in office playing the stock market. As a result, a significant chunk of the productive US economy has long since been off-shored to China, India and elsewhere. No amount of government funded money pumped into R & D can replace whole missing industries.


Jobseekers stand in line to attend the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. career fair held by the New York State department of Labor in New York (Reuters/Lucas Jackson)


Hyper-inflation in American higher education


American university and college costs are the highest in the world, bar none – and so is the level of student debt. Because of the extortionate costs involved in US higher education, most post graduate students are dependent on federal government funding for research and paid lab work in order to carry on up through the ranks of academia.


How did it get so expensive in recent years? One of the US government’s nice little profit centers is the student loan business. The amount of cheap money available in the form of lines of credit for education has exploded in the last decade. Universities and colleges, along with landlords and other suppliers, have taken full advantage by pushing prices up accordingly.


In addition to this, courting high paying overseas students has also become a number one priority for many private universities and colleges.


So what does it mean when a higher education is approaching the cost of a new home in America? Is a degree(s) really worth $ 150,000, or $ 200,000, plus interest? According to most statistical tables, there only one job available for every five higher education graduates in the United States today. Clearly, the only really winners here are the one profiting off the student loans. 


A job seeker meets with recruiters during the Job Hunters Boot Camp at the San Mateo Event Center in San Mateo, California. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images/AFP)


Immigration politics


A 2009 study by the National Science Foundation showed that foreign students on temporary visas took home 33% of all science and engineering doctorates in the United States.  The numbers are even higher in some other scientific fields. Up to 90% of these doctorate earners end up having to leave the US because of strict immigration rules. Why is this a problem? Because highly skilled immigrants are one of the chief drivers of innovation and success in higher education and industry in the United States.


For politicians and bureaucrats in the Washington DC, these graduates are not a top priority. Presently, the top concern for partisan leaders are low skilled, and low educated immigrants – because they potentially will deliver more votes. Hence, amnesty for illegal immigrants is what dominates the policy debates today. Politicians remain out to lunch on this issue, ignoring the reality that highly skilled foreign postgraduate earners not only dominate the high tech start-up sector, creating over half a million jobs in the high tech sector alone, but have also delivered the likes of Sun Microsystems, eBay and Google – just a few entrepreneur success stories who were founded, or co-founded by these highly educated, and highly skilled immigrants.


India’s booming technology hub is centered around the region of Bangalore, and it’s now attracting talented top recruits, not only from India – but also from the US. Many believe that the real revolutionary innovations and upwardly mobile opportunities will be found in markets like India, and China – and not in the US.


Vivek Wadhwa immigrated from India, and is now a visiting scholar to leading US institutions including Stanford, Duke and University of California at Berkley.


“The next Google, or the next Intel may well be in India, and not in America – that’s how serious a thing this is,” he told RT. 


It’s no longer a question of ‘if’. The brain drain has already begun.


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.




RT – Op-EdgePost id = does not exist.



Brain drain: Funding and industry leave America, followed by top minds