Showing posts with label popculture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label popculture. Show all posts

Saturday, October 12, 2013

Hipster R&B, Eli the Un-Manning: The Week"s Best Pop-Culture Writing

Hipster R&B, Eli the Un-Manning: The Week"s Best Pop-Culture Writing
http://thedailynewsreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/dbff5__gravitysandra.jpg

Click the links in the article titles to read the full pieces, and let us know what we’ve missed:



Slate
Gravity Is Going to Be a Camp Classic
J. Bryan Lowder



Camp lives in those random moments at which you can’t help but say, “Girl. Come on.” When you are momentarily knocked off narrative course by a piece of wild aesthetic debris that simply won’t be ignored. If you think you didn’t experience a few of these unintentional detours in Gravity, you’re either lying or were just too stressed out to notice. The latter is a fair excuse: I’ll allow that my argument may only be vindicated on a second viewing, once the shock-and-awe has worn off. But, mark my words, this movie will be midnight screening fodder in no time.


How could it not be? Here comes a Sandra Bullock (campy enough by itself) in a high-budget “Hanes Her Way” commercial that ends with a delightfully gauche SYMBOLIC tableaux of a fetus in utero. And then she starts talking to herself in a poorly written “I choose to live!” speech straight out of some black-and-white melodrama. Oh, and did you know (because, MORE PATHOS!) that she has a TRAGEDY in her past that she deals with by driving (“driving, George, just driving…”) a lot, presumably all the way to the Hubble Space Telescope? No worries if not, because Cuarón has included the sympathy fail-safe of a middle-aged white lady shaking a lot and mumbling in some kind of space capsule—a technique originated unforgettably by Jodie “OK TO GO” Foster in ContactAnd then, finally, more Hanes (and thigh muscles!) in a closing struggle with some seaweed and an unbearably heavy “Dawn of Man” metaphor as we cut, with ridiculously overwrought and loud scoring, to credits. GRAVITY. Get it? Because Cuarón’s thoughts about the universe and humanity have a lot of that.






AP / Virginia Mayo

Deadspin
Simone Biles Vs. The Racists: Are Black Gymnasts The New Black QBs?
Dvora Meyers


That’s where Ciaralli’s remarks about artistry come in. They are part of a larger ongoing conversation amongst coaches, athletes, judges, and fans as to the direction of the sport, on whether it moves in a more artistic direction or towards power and tricks, as though those are mutually exclusive categories. Most of these debates usually end with artistry supporters reminding everyone that the sport is called “artistic gymnastics,” never mind that no one can agree what “artistry” in gymnastics means.


Last year, I wrote about how “artistic” or “artistry” is coded language for body type. Lithe and flexible gymnasts are routinely called “artistic” regardless of how well they dance or engage with the music or audience. Short, muscular gymnasts such as former Olympic gold medalist Shawn Johnson or Biles are not considered “artistic” regardless of how they move or connect. (I’ve seen Biles perform live twice now—she can really sell a routine.) This, however, is the first time I’ve seen “artistry” brought up in the context of race. He’s pitting the “European” (read: white) body types on the “artistic” side against “powerful” and black. And given that many fans feel that increasing difficulty demands are destroying the supposed artistic nature of the sport, Ciaralli’s statements, for those who follow the sport closely, essentially turned Biles into the powerful bull in the elegant gymnastics china shop.




AP / John Shearer / Invision

Pitchfork
I Started a Joke: “PBR&B” and What Genres Mean Now
Eric Harvey


I have mixed feelings about being linked to such a phenomenon. Don’t get me wrong—it’s cool to have my name on Wikipedia, but I’d rather such an honor be for something I put a bit more time into, or, well, am actually proud of. I still think “PBR&B” is silly-if-not-catchy, though misleading yes, and even offensive to some—particularly the artists forced to suffer the indignity of having their music classified under the heading of a snarky joke.


If someone else came up with “PBR&B”, I would resent them. I “coined” it for the simple reason that it’s a pun, and I love puns. But I didn’t exactly coin it to describe the music itself. (Its grandfather genre, “Rhythm and Blues”, is another story. That was coined by Atlantic Records executive Jerry Wexler in 1949, to replace “Race Records”, the offensive name of a chart used at the time to rank the popularity of music made by African-Americans.) Instead, it’s one of those genres that describes an imagined fanbase. As Fennessey claimed in that article, there was a brief moment a few years ago when a handful of artists who nominally made R&B were doing so in a way that allowed certain observers to group them together. This happens regularly with any type of popular music, and R&B is no exception. The difference with “PBR&B” is that I cobbled together three artists who were doing drastically different things, more or less because they were making music that had the capacity to “cross over,” in old industry parlance. In more modern terms, it’s music rooted in African-American traditions that…well, to put it bluntly, might sell to young white people for whom other types of more rhythm-focused or bluesy modern R&B might not.




AP / David McNew

Flavorwire
Why Is No One Talking About the Fact That Chris Brown Was Raped?
Tom Hawking


It’s hard to imagine Jezebel (or anyone else, for that matter) being so trite about this quote if it came from… well, pretty much anyone apart from Chris Brown. But they’re not alone in this — neither the original profile nor any subsequent commentary made even the briefest mention of the fact that the encounter was a crime. Instead, writers have either described it as boasting, or said things like, “Chris doesn’t drop that fact as if it’s a crutch or a sign of a rough upbringing — instead the R&B singer totally owns it!,” or used it as an excuse for another clickbait hatepiece.


Let’s just say again: we’re talking about someone having sex with an eight-year-old here. Isn’t that worth stopping and thinking about for a bit? Apparently not — after all, it’s much easier just to pull out the quote and use it as the excuse for a bit of pageview-wrangling “CHRIS BROWN IS THE WORST” sensationalism than to think about its implications.





Spin
Can’t Stop, Won’t Stop: The Triumph of Mike WiLL Made It
Christina Lee


Despite being a hometown favorite, Mike gets more of a polite road-team reception during his radio tour. When HOT 107.9′s Durtty Boyz premieres “23,” they give it two slots on its Top 10 countdown, but offer no comment. V-103′s DJ Greg Street focuses on Cyrus’ controversial VMAs performance rather than the new music. “She need to come down to the A and get that booty right,” says Streetz 94.5′s DJ Holiday, allowing, slightly reluctantly, that he liked the track, adding little more. But Mike is optimistic, and with precedent.


“‘We Can’t Stop’  — everyone said that it wasn’t going to work on pop radio, because it didn’t have an EDM-type beat,” he says, still stationed in 94.5′s parking lot. “But it went to No. 2 onBillboard and No. 1 on iTunes.” As for “23,” he got plenty of advice: “People said, ‘You should put Miley last,’ or ‘It’s not going to work on urban radio.’” But his job is to make urban radio work for him. While on-air at 94.5, DJ Holiday asks Mike to name a bucket-list collaborator — “Lady Gaga,” he answers, “and any street artist I haven’t met who’s turnt up.”




AP / CBS

NPR
The Tribe Has Broken: How Sexism Is Silently Killing Survivor
Linda Holmes


Survivor has always been one of the most heavily gendered shows on television. It has specialized from the outset in a set of stereotypes: tough sexy male athletes, nurturing moms, sweet young things, wise and wily (male) silver foxes, and so forth. The women wear such wee bathing suits (while spending over a month foraging on an island) that one spent an entire season with a digitized blur floating just below the base of her spine and just above the waistband of her suit. Far more men than women have been treated as “leaders,” and host Jeff Probst has never been even one-tenth as interested in women contestants as he is in the men. He’s essentially come right out and said so, that the women just tend not to be as interesting on the whole as the men.


But this “Blood vs. Water” season, in which a tribe of returning players has been facing off against a tribe made up of their “loved ones,” has quickly ripened into the most distastefully bro-worshiping, wife-fearing season yet.





AP / John Marshall Mantel

Grantland
The Secret of Eli Manning
Brian Phillips


It makes fascinating viewing, watching the draft-day pundits try to reconcile those two big concepts, the Mannings and something wrong; it’s like there’s no verb to connect the parts of that sentence. The crowd at Madison Square Garden boos every mention of Eli’s name, but you can’t really come out as anti-Manning if you’re one of the boys in big suits. It’s not the done thing. Chris Berman at one point, and this is by way of firing off a criticism, just starts listing different categories of respect: “The Manning family. The first family. I mean, respect of the game. Respect of the people. Absolutely.” But then he hits on the conceptual solution he’s been grasping for, one that lets him question the family’s actions while still praising its essential nature. If the Mannings are synonymous with respect and honor, as they must be, but their manipulation of the draft isn’t respectful or honorable, as it maybe hasn’t been, then look: They’ve merely behaved in a way that has caused them not to resemble themselves. They’re not bad people. They’re just, in the moment, un-Manning-like.


And I don’t know about you, but watching this old draft footage now, watching Eli sheepishly blink down at Suzy Kolber during about 150 pre- and post-selection interviews, what runs through my head is, Why didn’t Peyton have to go through this? If you’re Peyton, everything just falls into place: You work hard, you binge-watch game film, a well-run Colts team happens to land the first draft pick, click. It’s as if fate shares your focus. Eli is more Archie’s natural heir than Peyton will ever be — like Eli, his dad was a fun and scrambly quarterback, more a seat-of-the-pants adventurer than the lucid math-compulsive then playing in Indiana — but because Peyton came along first, the definition of Manningness has somehow shifted in a way that includes Eli out. “Being here with my family these past few days has been really great,” he tells Kolber afterward. But something has been settled over this draft week: Eli is the un-Manning. He is the Manning who makes mistakes, and thus, as a Manning, he is unlike himself.







    








Master Feed : The Atlantic




Read more about Hipster R&B, Eli the Un-Manning: The Week"s Best Pop-Culture Writing and other interesting subjects concerning Opinion Columns at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, September 21, 2013

Good-Girl Jams and Grand Theft Auto: The Week"s Best Pop-Culture Writing

Click the links in the article titles to read the full pieces, and let us know what we’ve missed:


Rockstar Games

Buzzfeed
I Finished “Grand Theft Auto V” on One 38-Hour Sitting (Almost)
Joseph Bernstein


But is there even a “right” way to treat GTA V, the fresh behemoth that Rockstar Games has today delivered into the world after a half-decade, quarter-billion-dollar gestation? Should we treat it formally, purely as a game, in terms of graphics and gameplay and multiplayer features? That’s a good place to start, but it ignores the fact that this series has, over the past 15 years, become a genuine cultural touchstone, a shorthand in American life for both the best and the worst that games have to offer. OK, so should we treat it as a cultural phenomenon with a uniquely loaded past? Well, it’s that too, but as any old gamer can tell you, the foremost thing about these games is that when you strip away the outrage and outrageousness, they are really, stupidly, surpassingly fun and totally in love with the possibilities of gaming. Should we treat it as an entertainment product? Sure, and it will probably make more than a billion dollars, but it’s far too weird, too risky, too funny, and too beautiful to be considered a Call of Duty-style cash cow. So how about talking about it as a work of popular art, done by a game studio of unparalleled ambition? That’s closer, but, I mean, this is still a thing in which you can switch between boobular camera angles during a virtual lap dance.



Cash Money

NPR
Drake and Pop Music’s Good-Girl Problem
Ann Powers


A good girl ushered in the summer; a good girl is leading us out. And on some symbolic level, it’s the very same one. “Hold On, We’re Going Home,” the emotional centerpiece of Drake’s recently leaked new album, Nothing Was the Same, sounds like an answer song to Robin Thicke’s still inescapable “Blurred Lines” — except it’s not Thicke’s female conquest who gets to speak, it’s the other man, the scorned domesticator from whom the slick seducer offers escape.

While “Blurred Lines” presents a confident man leading a hesitant woman toward pleasurable discoveries (or, some have thought, harassing her), “Hold On” offers rescue grounded in confinement. In a croon so gentle it buffs the blade of Thicke’s delivery, Drake reminds his lady that he’s there for her — in the romantic sense, but also as, essentially, her keeper. “I got my eyes on you,” he begins, signaling surveillance; he wants her “hot love and emotion,” but he also wants to keep it in check. “You’re a good girl and you know it, you act so different around me,” he continues before giving her the ten-minute warning: Hold on, we’re going home. I’ll get your coat and call the valet, baby. You tell that snake to go his way.



ABC

Slate
Locked in a Nostalgia Funhouse With Kevin Arnold
Willa Paskin



Watching The Wonder Years today is to be locked into a nostalgia funhouse. Fantasies about and pangs for the ’50s and ’60s collide with quaintnesses from the ’80s and carom into the present, where Winnie Cooper recently kissed Avril Lavigne in a music video. With so much multigenerational wistfulness flying around, it’s nearly impossible to watch The Wonder Years and not feel nostalgic about something. But rewatching the series recently didn’t make me long for the late ’60s. It also didn’t make me miss ’80s sitcoms, which shamelessly impart corny lessons (“What we felt in those years, the joy, the possibilities, will always be a part of us … ”) and are so broad that, five seasons in, The Wonder Years was still reintroducing Winnie every time she showed up on screen. What The Wonder Years made me nostalgic for is how much better we used to be at being nostalgic—ouch, sorry, that was me slamming into a nostalgia mirror.


AP

The New Republic
What Jonathan Franzen Misunderstands About Me
Jennifer Weiner


In 2010, I coined the hashtag Franzenfreude. It was very bad German for a very real problem: When Franzen’s most recent novel, Freedom, was published, newspapers and magazines devoted thousands of words to the book and its author, while giving other literary books far less attention, and, in some cases, ignoring commercial works completely. Perhaps Franzen’s recent name-check was payback for when I implied that he was the face of white male literary privilege, or for pointing out that he’s the kind of writer who goes on Facebook only to announce that he won’t be doing Facebook, with the implication that he doesn’t have to do Facebook, because the media does his status updates for him. Or maybe he just really, really hates “The Bachelor.”

In his essay, Franzen reserves his respect for “the people who became writers because yakking and tweeting and bragging felt to them like intolerably shallow forms of social engagement,” the ones who “want to communicate in depth, individual to individual, in the quiet and permanence of the printed word.” But as long as there have been books, there have been writers who’ve preferred yakking and bragging to quiet and permanence. In the 1880s, there was Oscar Wilde on lecture tours. In the 1960s, there was ​Truman Capote on “What’s My Line?” 




AP / Darron Cummings

ESPN Magazine
The NFL’s International Casting Call
Ryan McGee


Longtime scout Jon Shaw had lobbied the Colts’ front office to invite Adongo to camp because of his raw athletic ability. Skeptics were silenced when the 23-year-old showed up, fresh off a plane from Johannesburg, and broad-jumped 11 feet, which would have been sixth-best at this year’s combine. Not bad for someone who’d never broad-jumped before. Adongo ended up snagging one of Indianapolis’ eight practice-squad spots despite not recording any preseason stats. “He’s a clean canvas,” Colts linebackers coach Jeff FitzGerald said.

The league seems to be stocking up on such canvases. A record 12 foreign-born players were selected in April’s NFL draft. From 1990 to 2011, only seven players who didn’t attend high school in North America were drafted. In the last two drafts, there have been five. Those foreign-born players bring varying levels of football experience. Certainly none has the typical U.S. background of pee-wee leagues, Friday night high school games, year-round television exposure, and endless coverage of major college football and the NFL.



Fox

Salon
Lessons of “The X-Files”: The One Show Every TV Exec Should Be Watching
Alec Nevala-Lee


When “The X-Files” premiered 20 years ago, on September 10, 1993, it was thrown into a television landscape that seems increasingly hard to recognize. There were no box sets or streaming options; Netflix and BitTorrent didn’t exist; the Internet, which would play such a large role in the show’s popularity, was just starting to appear in most homes. When I first encountered it, part of me was irked by its narrative amnesia, in which each case’s incredible events were forgotten by the following week, but it didn’t have much of a choice. Each episode had to stand on its own; the show, always seemingly on the verge of cancellation, had to keep moving or die.

Of course, it was far from alone. When a series first appears, it’s impossible to know what it might become, which is why it can be so painful to revisit a pilot — or, in the case of “Parks and Recreation,” an entire early season — of a show you’ve come to love. A series needs time to learn its own strengths, and it doesn’t always get a chance: television history is littered with casualties, like the lamented “Bunheads,” that died far too soon. Telling shapely stories when the endgame is so uncertain requires an inhuman degree of skill, and only a handful of geniuses, like Matthew Weiner of “Mad Men,” have pulled it off over an extended run. But the medium’s unforgiving nature can also result in astonishing discoveries for the shows that manage to survive.




Grantland
The Loneliness of the Alt-Rock Anniversary
Steven Hyden


And yet I suspect that August and Everything After won’t get the same coverage asIn Utero. They certainly haven’t been put on the same plane before now, and the reason why is obvious: Counting Crows has a bad-to-nonexistent standing with most critics. Music writers either don’t like them or don’t consider them worthy of thinking about one way or the other. Among “normal” people, Counting Crows is a group you can casually mock without having to justify it. I don’t think it’s necessarily the consensus opinion that Counting Crows sucks, because I know plenty of people who couldn’t care less about the band’s albums but will concede that “Round Here” is a great song. It’s just accepted that Counting Crows signifies a lot of what’s retroactively considered embarrassing about ’90s rock — the earnestness, the over-the-top emotionalism that veers into whininess, and the weird combination of sullenness about fame and the intense interest in crafting singles that are still played endlessly on the radio.

What’s funny (or maybe just confusing) about all of this is that what makes Counting Crows seem dated in the minds of serious music fans is what also makes Nirvana seem immortal. The canonization of Kurt Cobain is based on the premise that he was an “authentic” person — he critiqued the star system while also embodying what a rock star is supposed to be, and he did so better than any musician of his time (or since). Adam Duritz, meanwhile, isn’t perceived like that, even though he’s authentic in a similar way.



New World Pictures

Vulture
How 1985’s Girls Just Want to Have Fun Set the Template for All Future Dance Movies
Jessica Roake


3. The rich snob/romantic rival
It’s not enough that dancing heroes must contend with the challenge of learning/nailing the art of dance: She has to deal with some petty competition as well. The villain is either wealthier/more respected than our heroine or a jealous romantic rival, and she hates our heroine with a vicious single-mindedness that seems a scooch extreme. She seeks to undercut, sabotage, and generally humiliate our heroine at every turn. In Girls Just Want to Have Fun, Natalie (Holly Gagnier) is a rich snob, a romantic rival, and Janey’s biggest competition, which makes her extra formidable. And her dad tries to fix the Dance TV contest! 

See also: Strictly Ballroom’s Liz (Gia Carides), Save the Last Dance’s Nikki (Bianca Lawson), Stomp the Yard’s Grant (Darrin Dewitt Henson)






    








Master Feed : The Atlantic



Good-Girl Jams and Grand Theft Auto: The Week"s Best Pop-Culture Writing

Saturday, September 14, 2013

Wrestlers" Kisses, Writers" Pet Words: The Week"s Best Pop-Culture Writing

Click the links in the article titles to read the full pieces, and let us know what we’ve missed:


National Portrait Gallery, London

The New Yorker
Pet Words
Brad Leithauser


The word “sweet” appears eight hundred and forty times in your complete Shakespeare. Or nearly a thousand times, if you accept close variants (“out-sweeten’d,” “true-sweet,” “sweetheart”). This level of use comes as no surprise to anyone who loves the sonnets and plays: whether in moments of fondest coaxing and chiding (“When your sweet issue your sweet form should bear”) or abject anguish and empathy (“Bless thy sweet eyes—they bleed”), Shakespeare reliably repaired to a sugared lexicon. It’s similarly unsurprising to learn that “flower” and “flowers” bloom on more than a hundred occasions in E. E. Cummings’s poetry; for him, the rotation of the seasons meant that spring followed hard on the heels of spring. Likewise, one might rightly predict that within A. E. Housman’s verses “lad” and “lads” would tabulate more densely than “beauty” or “life” or even “love” or “death.” For him, “lad” was probably the richest word in the language—a modest, slender triad of letters on which he hung his deepest feelings of fascination, lust, exclusion, and (especially when regarding soldiers in uniform) envy and gratitude.

Every poet, every novelist has his or her pet words. Which words these may be dawns on you gradually as you enter the world of a new writer. The deeper you read, the more likely it is that a fresh line in effect becomes an old line, as a signature vocabulary term rings out variations on previous usages. Of course, with many major authors this process of identifying pet words can be hastened and simplified by consulting a concordance. Either way, you’ll likely discover that your author’s personal dictionary contains an abundance of amiable acquaintances, but a select few intimate friends.



Hot 97

The New York Times
Homophobia and Hip-Hop: A Confession Breaks a Barrier
Jon Caramanica


In its detail and frankness the talk became not just a discussion about one man’s personal struggles but also an intense and public conversation about hip-hop and sexuality. Implicitly, Mister Cee was addressing how he thought the two parts of himself — his sexual identity and his hip-hop celebrity — couldn’t coexist.

Some of his concerns were practical: “Am I still gonna get bookings? Is the promoter still gonna book me if I say, ‘Yeah, occasionally I have fellatio with a transsexual?’”

That question underscored not only the genre’s history of intolerance, but also the fundamental conundrum of the hip-hop D.J.—omnipresent but largely anonymous.



Glassnote

Slate
Could Mumford & Sons Get Better?
Carl Wilson


Of all the strains of 1960s folk revivalism, the last I’d have figured anyone missed was the happy-clappy collegiate spirit of the New Christy Minstrels. Yet here it is enjoying a reanimation in the second decade of the 21st century. And it’s not only the multiplatinum, Grammy-guesting, hanging-with-celebs hootenanny-jam bands—old-timey music is hip with tribes of boho youth who can be found affecting creaky hill-people vocals and busking favorite cuts from the Anthology of American Folk Music in porkpie hats and/or cutoff Crass T-shirts at indie music festivals and/or street corners in New Orleans.

It’s a very inexact science to dissect why musical movements happen. They might be set in motion by individual inspiration, respond to socio-economic conditions, or evolve out of innovations within a form (from, e.g., swing to bebop) or via new technology (1980s synth-pop or 1990s techno) or from distinctive street cultures (1950s doo-wop). Often—for instance with hip-hop—you’d have to say all of the above. Revivalist waves are more mysterious still: Why do clusters of young musicians and listeners gravitate to particular bygone sounds at particular times, and is there more to it than nostalgic arrested development?



Fox Searchlight

Grantland
Is 12 Years a Slave Really a Best Picture Lock?
Mark Harris


But it’s worth asking why — aside from its reported excellence — 12 Years a Slave rather than some other movie is the beneficiary of this year’s hasty coronation. The answer may not be that buzz moves quickly, but that Hollywood moves slowly. The thirst to wrap up 2013′s Academy Awards narrative before it has even started with a film that tears into the history of slavery in America may represent, at long last, the Obama Effect rippling all the way to the Dolby Theatre. And I don’t mean the effect of his reelection. I mean Obama 2008.

Movies take a long time — what often seems an insanely long time — to make. We like to imagine that the films to which we respond most passionately are those that illuminate our moment, but when they do, it’s usually by luck or by prescience. What “timely” movies actually reflect is the passion for a subject that a writer, director, or producer had two to five years earlier, which is about what it takes for a serious, Oscar-friendly film to evolve from conception to release. (Last year’s two most nominated pictures, Lincoln and Life of Pi, each took a decade.) It has been five and a half years since then-senator Obama, in the middle of his 2008 primary fight, called for a “national conversation about race” in one of his first widely seen speeches. But when he brought up the idea, most people didn’t know where to begin.



The Weinstein Company

Flavorwire
African-American Film Isn’t Having a Renaissance: Harvey Weinstein and the Myth of the “Obama Effect”
Lillian Ruiz


Let’s get one thing straight: this fall’s slate of mainstream films starring black actors and directed by black filmmakers does not signal a renaissance of African-American film. A renaissance symbolizes newness, rebirth, revival — a moment of artistic vigor and intellectual frenzy amongst a cultural coterie — not lucky timing. More importantly, the oppression narratives propelling this year’s 12 Years a Slave and The Butler are already well-worn tropes about the African-American experience. Yes, by all accounts these films are beautifully acted, compelling, and worthy of praise, but declaring on the basis of these films that black films are having “a moment” isn’t just simplistic; it’s disappointing and willfully narrow-minded.

Between January and August of 2011, The Weinstein Company began production on three films: 12 Years a SlaveDjango Unchained, and The Butler. These films strike different tones and address different themes but exist in the same contextual setting of oppression and servitude. In the context of Weinstein’s rather bizarre “Obama effect” theory, this makes perfect sense. These three black films are firmly rooted in the past, where racism and its power structures are clearly identified as morally reprehensible and easy to keep at a distance. It’s easy to prattle on about racial lines being erased when you choose to selectively focus on archaic systems that have also been visibly swept away.



Harmonix

The Gameological Society
The Rise and Fall of Rock Band
Anthony John Agnello


Harmonix, the Boston-based developer behind Rock Band (and the entire plastic-instrument-game phenomenon of the last decade) released its last downloadable songs for the game on April 2, two and a half years after the release of the final game in the series, Rock Band 3. Don McLean’s “American Pie” closed out 281 consecutive weeks of new songs for living room partiers, each one almost rewritten from the ground up by the studio to be played by amateurs with plastic instruments. Classic songs, underground indie bar burners, metalhead thrashers—they were all reimagined as video game feats of dexterity, each one adapted for all kinds of skill levels.

Rock Band turned into this social game, this kind of collaborative experience,” Harmonix’s Greg LoPiccolo said. LoPiccolo was one of the project leaders on the series from the start. “We got a lot of emails from people, like families who didn’t get along and teenage kids who couldn’t get along, but they could all play Rock Band together, and that was a common ground. You know, Mom would sing and whatever. There’s precious little of that in the world. Insofar as we were able to create an environment where people could do that and enjoy each other’s company, that was a big deal for me.”



Flickr / LINXBAS

ESPN Magazine
Beso de los Exoticos
Eric Nusbaum


He emerges in aviator shades and a white leather jacket speckled with rhinestones, collar turned up high. Lately, Maximo has been going for what he calls a gay Elvis look, growing sideburns and a pompadour under his trademark pink mohawk. The crowd shrieks and laughs and loses its mind as he bounds down the steps, past the lines of shimmying ring girls in bikinis. When the short, stocky wrestler leaps over the ropes and into the ring, the skirt on his purple Greco-Roman singlet flutters.

Once the three-on-three match begins, Maximo doesn’t merely fling himself off the ropes like most wrestlers, he prances. Before launching himself out of the ring to torpedo one opponent, El Terrible, he looks to the crowd and lets his eyes linger, his expressive features visible from the farthest of the arena’s 17,000 seats. With his foe cornered against the turnbuckles, Maximo stands, straddling him on the second rope. He holds the squirming El Terrible’s head back and wags his tongue, taunting him as the audience chants BE-SO, BE-SO.

Then, finally, Maximo delivers the symbolic deathblow: a fat kiss on the mouth.



DC Comics

Forbes
True Blood‘s Sookie: As Close To Wonder Woman As TV Gets
Dina Gachman


It doesn’t seem to be a problem getting male superheroes like Batman, Superman, or Wolverine right, so what’s the deal with Wonder Woman? Is she so complicated? She’s a warrior woman with superpowers and a magical lasso. This refrain of waiting to “get it right” is starting to get old. Do the execs secretly think people don’t want a show focused on a female superhero? Does a female showrunner need to take the reins and give Diana of Themyscira a makeover? It’s not like men can’t create amazing female characters, but in this case, maybe they can’t.

Consider Sookie Stackhouse. The True Blood heroine was created by the novelist Charlaine Harris and Alan Ball brought her to TV. Sookie isn’t twirling around and morphing into a warrior woman in a corset, but she is a superhero with millions of fans and a cool origin story. She fights, gets bloody, curses like a sailor, and drinks Southern Comfort when she needs to settle down after a hard day of battling clawed demons and bloodthirsty Vampire Kings. Some people find True Blood corny, with its endless supply of supernatural beings and its bodice-ripping sex scenes that look like a cross between a Fabio romance novel cover and Bride of Chucky. I happen to love the werepanthers, vampire fairy brides, shapeshifters, Wicca cult leaders, and vicious maenads on True Blood. Since no one can seem to get Wonder Woman right, it seems like Sookie might not be a bad character to look to for some inspiration, since so many execs are obviously stuck.



Vulture
Does Country Music Have a Problem with Women?
Jody Rosen


Retrograde sex roles are nothing new in country music, pop’s bastion of conservatism. It’s been fascinating, in recent decades, to see the ways country women have reconciled traditional values with changing times — whether slyly embracing feminism or stubbornly upholding the patriarchal status quo.

But in 2013, women in country are more marginal than at any time in recent memory. It’s not that there aren’t female stars. In fact, there are three huge ones: the large-lunged diva Underwood; Miranda Lambert, the feisty solo superstar who moonlights in the Pistol Annies; and, of course, Taylor Swift, the biggest commercial force in country, period, although her ties to the genre are becoming more tenuous. There are also some second- and third-tier stars, like Sugarland’s Jennifer Nettles, Kimberly Perry of the Band Perry, and Lady Antebellum’s Hillary Scott.

But these women are outliers — exceptions that prove the rule driven home by all those girls in the country top twenty. When women turn up on country radio, they’re usually fantasy figures, collaged together from back issues ofMaxim and Field and Stream: hot chicks, in jeans strategically shredded For His Pleasure, doing modified pole dances in a pasture, behind a barn, in the glare of their boyfriends’ pickup truck headlights. Sometimes, in songs like “It Goes Like This,” they are sung to — but they’re not doing any singing themselves. They’re ornamental: pretty scenery at a sausage party.






    








Master Feed : The Atlantic



Wrestlers" Kisses, Writers" Pet Words: The Week"s Best Pop-Culture Writing