Showing posts with label stalling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stalling. Show all posts

Friday, January 31, 2014

US accuses Syria of stalling on chemical disarmament, warns of UN Chapter 7 consequences

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



US accuses Syria of stalling on chemical disarmament, warns of UN Chapter 7 consequences

Monday, November 18, 2013

Audi"s advance risks stalling without new technology drive

Audi"s advance risks stalling without new technology drive
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/9501c__?m=02&d=20131118&t=2&i=812907497&w=460&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=CBRE9AH1BZN00.jpg





BERLIN Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:16pm EST



The company logo of Volkswagen

The company logo of Volkswagen’s Audi AG premium unit is pictured on the hub caps of a car during the annual news conference in Ingolstadt March 11, 2008.


Credit: Reuters/Michael Dalder




BERLIN (Reuters) – German luxury carmaker Audi has boasted Vorsprung durch Technik – advancement through technology – as its slogan since the 1970s. But signs are growing it is losing sight of its own advice.


Research and development spending by the 81-year-old brand, which is the profit engine of parent Volkswagen (VW), last year amounted to less than three-quarters of arch-rival BMW’s outlay and a smaller fraction of Mercedes owner Daimler’s.


While BMW trumpets its new “i” series of electric cars and Mercedes wins rave reviews for its new CLA and GLA ranges of sporty compact models, Audi risks looking like a laggard in an industry where innovation is a major draw for customers.


“I’ve grown tired of that single-frame grille,” said Stefan Reimann, a 47-year-old public relations manager looking at the front of the new Audi A3 compact at a Berlin showroom.


“BMW and Mercedes seem to be so much more progressive now. It’s about time for Audi to live up to their promise,” he added.


The stakes are high. Audi contributed over 40 percent of VW’s (VOWG_p.DE) nine-months profit of 8.6 billion euros ($ 11.6 billion) and it is critical to funding the expansion of Europe’s biggest carmaker as it strives to overtake General Motors (GM.N) and Toyota (7203.T) and become world number one by 2018.


Any weakening at Audi could also add to doubts about VW’s broader strategy, with some analysts questioning whether a new manufacturing platform aimed at sharing costs among its brands will deliver the projected benefits, and whether it has cut prices too much to win market share in Europe.


On the surface, everything looks fine.


Audi, which has doubled model lines and deliveries over the past decade, is shrinking BMW’s (BMWG.DE) sales lead, with deliveries in the first ten months of 2013 at a record 1.31 million cars versus 1.35 million at BMW.


The brand, which pioneered all-aluminum bodyworks and “Quattro” four-wheel drives in the 1980s, is also rapidly expanding in fast-growing emerging markets, with new production facilities in China, Mexico and Brazil.


But there are signs that all is not well.


Audi is on its third R&D chief in 16 months and a VW source told Reuters the parent was concerned the brand is resting on its laurels just as rivals push new technologies and designs.


TROUBLE DOWN THE LINE


The gap is barely apparent under the bonnets in car showrooms – though industry-watchers point out that Audi’s flagship A8 lacks the rival Mercedes S-Class sedan’s plug-in hybrid powertrain option or its semi-autonomous driving function for traffic jams.


For now, Audi’s drift is most visible among the more innovative vehicles that are too easily dismissed as niche models or far-fetched prototypes.


Audi has little to show, for example, opposite BMW’s i3 and i8 electric cars – which also pioneered carbon-fiber manufacturing techniques tipped to see wider use – or Daimler’s investment in hydrogen fuel cells and self-driving cars.


Even when it doesn’t lead to mass sales, such risk-taking can pay dividends for a brand’s “halo”. BMW has received 100,000 test-drive applications for the futuristic i3 mini.


“Constant innovation is absolutely crucial for high-end carmakers,” said Boston Consulting Group senior partner Andreas Maurer. “If a customer feels that a premium manufacturer has nothing new in the pipeline, that company is in trouble.”


But battery-powered versions of the Audi R8 sports car and A1 subcompact were shelved last year as VW focused on plug-in hybrids as a more conservative approach to meeting European Union carbon emissions targets.


“Audi lacks a vision of the future as well as core competence on technology,” said Arndt Ellinghorst, London-based head of automotive research at ISI.


“They have little to offer nowadays in terms of a clear corporate message and mainly live off their past success.”


The loss of momentum is also showing up in projections.


IHS Automotive, among the most authoritative forecasters, expects Audi to be outsold once more by Mercedes next year, after three years in the industry’s No. 2 slot. Neither will overtake BMW’s global sales by 2020, it predicts.


BRAIN DRAIN


A 16 percent rise in Audi’s R&D budget to 2.9 billion euros last year from 2010 was dwarfed by BMW’s 43 percent surge to 4 billion, according to company data. Mercedes parent Daimler (DAIGn.DE) posted a 14 percent rise to 5.6 billion euros.


The figures do not necessarily compare like with like, however, as Audi also benefits from R&D spending in other parts of the VW group.


Audi rejects the idea it is losing its technology mojo, pointing to its plug-in hybrids – which avoid the range limitations of pure-electric cars – and its own use of aluminium and composites to cut weight.


Yet senior executives seem to think there are problems.


Audi’s latest R&D boss, Ulrich Hackenberg, unexpectedly pulled a concept car from September’s Frankfurt car show line-up and ordered engineers to install an alternative hybrid powertrain, a source with direct knowledge of the matter said.


Christoph Stuermer, Frankfurt-based analyst with IHS, says Audi is suffering the effects of a brain drain that saw the division’s CEO, R&D chief and top designer all leave for the VW brand in 2007. They were followed two years later by the transfer of its engine development chief to Porsche.


The addition of luxury sports car brand Porsche to VW’s stable in 2012 is also causing problems at Audi, according to another source familiar with the matter.


“There’s a certain amount of jealousy at play,” the source said, requesting anonymity.


In a bid to fight back, Audi plans to refresh design and create a more distinctive face for high-end models and sportier vehicles, boost lightweight construction and plug gaps in SUV offerings while expanding to 60 models from 46, the source said.


But it may face an uphill struggle. IHS is forecasting that sales of the A1, Audi’s smallest model, will drop to 101,700 cars in 2018, down 16 percent from 2012, while sales of BMW’s rival Mini hatchback rise 3.1 percent to 140,300.


At the top end, sales of the A8 sedan are expected to rise 19 percent to 44,900 cars, compared with gains of 22 percent to 81,900 for the revamped Mercedes S-Class and 30 percent for BMW’s 7-Series, to 85,300 cars.


($ 1 = 0.7421 euros)


(Additional reporting by Irene Preisinger; Editing by Laurence Frost and Mark Potter)






Reuters: Business News




Read more about Audi"s advance risks stalling without new technology drive and other interesting subjects concerning Business at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Friday, November 8, 2013

Agent feared FBI was stalling Petraeus investigation until after 2012 election


Reed Saxon / AP, file



David H. Petraeus, former army general and head of the Central Intelligence Agency, speaks at the annual dinner for veterans and ROTC students at the University of Southern California, in downtown Los Angeles Tuesday, March 26, 2013.




By Michael Isikoff, National Investigative Correspondent, NBC News


A veteran FBI counterterrorism agent repeatedly raised concerns last year that senior bureau officials were stalling an investigation into then-CIA Director David Petraeus’ extramarital affair to avoid a distraction prior to the 2012 presidential election, according to a former FBI official and two sources with direct knowledge of the agent’s account.


New details about the claims of Fred Humphries, a 17-year FBI veteran who is assigned to the bureau’s Tampa office, are expected to be included in a legal filing soon by Jill Kelley, a Tampa Bay socialite who became embroiled in the Petraeus investigation. NBC News independently learned how Humphries raised concerns about possible interference in the investigation with a former senior bureau official and Republican lawmakers, arguing that it could pose a potential national security risk. 


Kelley, who had close social connections to a wide array of senior U.S. military and intelligence officials, many of whom she met at parties she threw at her home, is suing current and former Obama administration officials for allegedly leaking her name and smearing her reputation after the case became public. Kelley’s lawsuit threatens to force a re-examination of the details of Petraeus’ resignation and to require a number of key players — including former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Deputy FBI Director Sean Joyce (who announced his resignation this week), Homeland Security Secretary nominee Jeh Johnson and many others — to answer questions under oath.



Petraeus resigned as CIA director one year ago this week after an FBI “cyberstalking” investigation into harassing emails sent to Kelley uncovered a sexual relationship between the CIA director and his biographer, Paula Broadwell.


Humphries’ claims about high-level interference from FBI headquarters were raised in multiple conversations last year with his former boss, Charles Mandigo, a former special agent in charge of the FBI’s Seattle office, where Humphries had previously been assigned. Mandigo then helped arrange for Humphries to raise his concerns with two Republican members of Congress, including House Majority Leader Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va.


Humphries “said at one point, he had been told, just sit back and wait. Once the election is over, this will be quietly handled and it will all be resolved,” Mandigo said. Humphries attributed the comment to an unidentified  senior official in the FBI’s Tampa office, he said. 


Chris O’Meara / AP



Jill Kelley leaves her home in Tampa, Fla., on Nov. 13, 2012.




Among the claims in Kelley’s lawsuit, which relies in part on Humphries’ account, is that Joyce, the deputy FBI director, assumed control of the investigation, preempted decisions made by Tampa agents assigned to the case and, at one point, directed them to delay a scheduled interview with Broadwell. The suit alleges that the case was handled “differently than normal criminal investigations” because bureau officials “wanted to avoid attention before the upcoming presidential election cycle.”


An FBI spokesman declined comment, citing “pending litigation.” The Justice Department has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, asserting that she does not have grounds to bring the complaint under the Privacy Act. 


Humphries, who has been portrayed in some media reports as a whistleblower — although he was never specifically assigned to the Petraeus case — was informed last summer that he is the subject of a misconduct probe by the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility for the “unauthorized disclosure” of law enforcement information relating to the investigation, according to a source with direct knowledge of the matter.


Reached on his cellphone this week, Humphries declined to discuss details but said his decision to raise his concerns outside of bureau channels “was the right thing to do – even if it was unpleasant. If it happened again, I would do the same thing. Nobody is above the law, nobody is below it.” 


The investigation of Petraeus began in early June 2012 after Kelley and her husband stated receiving what they viewed as harassing and threatening emails from an anonymous correspondent – with the addresses “Kelley patrol” and “Tampa Angel.” The emailer appeared to know precise details about the private schedules of Petraeus and senior generals at the U.S. Central Command, including an upcoming dinner that Kelley had planned with the CIA director. The emails suggested the movements of senior U.S. officials as well as Kelley were “clearly being tracked by someone with a hostile fixation,” according to the lawsuit filed by Kelley and her husband, Sean Kelley, a doctor.


One email concluded with threats about “averting… embarrassment for all, including spouses, such as info in national headlines,” according to the Kelley complaint, which was filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., in June. 


Kelley first reported these emails to Humphries, a personal friend, who in turn passed them along to agents in Tampa who launched a “cyberstalking” investigation.  Although Humphries was not assigned to the investigation, he stayed in touch with Kelley and monitored developments in the probe. 


Humphries has alleged that in July 2012, he was called into the offices of Steve Ibison, then the special agent in charge of the Tampa office, and told that the “senior leadership of the FBI was convinced” he was having sexual relations with Kelley, according to a source directly familiar with his account. Humphries denied the charges — as has Kelley — and offered to take a polygraph, but that offer was not accepted, the source said. (An FBI spokesman in Tampa declined comment.)


Shortly thereafter, Humphries reached out to Mandigo, his former boss and expressed concern that he was being made a “scapegoat” in a politically toxic investigation. 


“What troubled me is somebody was clearly going out their way to discredit the guy,” Mandigo said. “They were engaging in character assassination.”


Mandigo, who had previously served as a FBI spokesman in Washington, praised Humphries as a “great agent” who played a leading role in major counterterrorism cases, including the investigation into the so-called “millennium bomber” Ahmed Ressam, an al Qaeda operative who tried to blow up Los Angeles International Airport in December 1999. But Humphries, according to Mandigo, was also known as a maverick who sometimes ran afoul of FBI headquarters, including writing memos questioning aggressive interrogation techniques while serving as a deputy FBI commander at the U.S. detention facility in Guantanamo.


Mandigo said he became especially concerned when he learned from Humphries that FBI agents had traced the harassing emails to Broadwell, Petraeus’ biographer. Mandigo said he and Humphries believed there were “national security concerns” that demanded that the investigation be aggressively pursued and concluded.


“Consider the possibility that one or both of them (Petraeus and Broadwell) could have been compromised,” Mandigo said. “If that happened, how could they rationalize how they handled this?”


After several conversations, Mandigo helped arrange for Humphries to raise his concerns with Republican Rep. Dave Reichert, who represented the Seattle area, and then with Cantor during the week before last year’s election. 


According to accounts provided by U.S. law enforcement  and congressional officials last year, Cantor, alerted by Reichert, called Humphries on Oct. 27. Steve Sombres, the majority leader’s chief of staff, then called then FBI Director Bob Mueller’s chief of staff on Oct. 31 to inquire about the Petraeus probe.


In the days that followed, FBI agents completed their second interviews with Petraeus and Broadwell. At 5 p.m. on Tuesday, Nov. 6 — Election Day — Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was informed by the FBI of the investigation and that the CIA director had acknowledged a sexual relationship with Broadwell. That Friday, Nov. 9, Petraeus resigned.


The Kelley lawsuit is focused on her treatment during the investigation, alleging agents violated her privacy by demanding “unrestricted access” to her private emails and, along with senior Defense Department officials, later leaked information about them — suggesting she was having an inappropriate relationship with Gen. John Allen, then the U.S. commander in Afghanistan.


Her complaint also describes a scene in the driveway of her Tampa home on July 17, 2012 in which, she alleges, FBI agents confronted her while her three children were in her house and demanded she get in a SUV for questioning. When she balked, “the agents threatened her, demanding that she not make them do something in front of her children that may terrify them.” After she got in the SUV, the complaint states, agents “demanded she answer bewildering questions regarding her relationship with Director Petraeus and General Allen — including insinuations and accusations that she was engaged in adulterous activity.”


During the height of the furor over the case, Humphries was reported to have sent a “shirtless” photo to Kelley. But Mandigo noted that he and many others had gotten a copy of the same “joke” photo years earlier. It showed Humphries next to two mannequins at a shooting range. Humphries was known for sending such photos, he said, adding, “That’s just Fred.” 


More from NBC News Investigations:


Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook



Investigate this!


Read and vote on readers’ story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.





Investigations



Agent feared FBI was stalling Petraeus investigation until after 2012 election