Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Democrats bash SCOTUS ruling

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev. (left) is pictured with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of Calif. | AP Photo

Senate Democrats are already planning to respond. | AP Photo





Democratic lawmakers and campaign finance reform advocates quickly bashed Wednesday’s Supreme Court decision to strike down total limits on individual campaign contributions, warning of future corruption in elections.


Meanwhile, Republicans largely cheered the ruling from the narrowly divided court, which found it unconstitutional to impose caps on the aggregate amounts that one person can donate to campaigns, parties and political action committees.







Calling himself “all for freedom,” Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Wednesday commended the ruling, saying “donors ought to have the freedom to give what they want to give.” And Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who had filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, also praised the decision.


(Also on POLITICO: Supreme Court strikes down aggregate campaign giving limits)


“Let me be clear for all those who would criticize the decision: It does not permit one more dime to be given to an individual candidate or a party,” McConnell said Wednesday. “It just respects the constitutional rights of individuals to decide how many to support.”


Senate Democrats, who control the chamber, are already planning to respond. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said he will hold a hearing on the impact of the McCutcheon decision and other rulings from the high court that he says “have eviscerated our campaign finance laws.”


Meanwhile, Maine Sen. Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, said he introduced legislation intended to make donations more transparent by requiring all contributions of $ 1,000 or more to be disclosed to the Federal Election Commission within 48 hours. A campaign bill in the House will be introduced by Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas).


(Also on POLITICO: Dems lead Twitter charge against ruling)


“This in itself is a small step, but another step on the road to ruination,” said New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, the third-ranking Democrat. “It could lead to interpretations of the law that would result in the end of any fairness in the political system as we know it.”


Responding to the decision, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) invoked his favorite boogeymen: the Koch brothers.


“The Supreme Court today just accentuated what they did on Citizens United, which is a decision that is one of the worst decisions in the history of that court,” Reid said during a press conference on raising the minimum wage. “All it does is take away people’s rights because, as you know, the Koch brothers are trying to buy America.”


Over in the House, Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.) said he plans to introduce legislation that will “fully reverse this latest Supreme Court blunder.” And House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called for passage of legislation sponsored by Rep. John Sarbanes (D-Md.) that is meant to amplify small-dollars donations to congressional candidates.


“Our founders risked their lives, their liberty and their sacred honor to create a democracy — a government of the many, not a government of the money,” Pelosi said in a statement. “After misguided and destructive court decisions in McCutcheon and Citizens United, it is clear that Congress must act swiftly to restore fairness to our campaign finance system.”


Current federal law limits the total amount an individual can give to $ 48,600 for candidates and $ 74,600 in contributions to PACs and party committees in each two-year cycle. That’s separate from the $ 2,600 limit on donations to a single candidate and the $ 32,400 cap on donations to parties.


While Democrats publicly criticized the decision, they were far more positive in private. One top Hill Democrat suggested Democrats had a larger number of donors, and they can now go back and ask these supporters for even more money.


Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the author of the landmark 2002 McCain-Feingold law that clamped down on soft-money contributions, said he was “disappointed” by Wednesday’s ruling — calling it the latest move from justices to “dismantle entirely the longstanding structure of campaign finance law.”


“I predict that as a result of recent court decisions, there will be scandals involving corrupt public officials and unlimited, anonymous campaign contributions that will force the system to be reformed once again,” McCain said.


Burgess Everett, Jake Sherman and John Bresnahan contributed to this report.




POLITICO – Congress



Democrats bash SCOTUS ruling

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

House Democrats pressuring Republicans for immigration reform vote

A girl wears a

House Democrats continue to batter against the brick wall of Speaker John Boehner’s refusal to allow a vote on immigration reform (along with extending emergency unemployment aid, raising the minimum wage, and a host of other popular measures). Democrats are launching a discharge petition pushing for a vote on a bill similar to the Senate’s bipartisan immigration reform bill.

Like other discharge petitions Democrats have circulated recently, this one stands little chance of getting the Republican signatures needed. But Greg Sargent points to a way a discharge petition could produce results even without enough signatures:


[T[he more important aim is to give those House Republicans who are generally pro-reform a hook to exert more private pressure on GOP leaders to act, by letting the piecemeal reform proposals that are knocking around among House Republicans get a vote.

I’m told immigration advocacy groups and labor have drawn up a target list of around 30 House Republicans who have previously expressed public support for reform and/or a path to citizenship, to be targeted with pressure back home in their districts.


Among the Republicans on that list: David Valadao, Jeff Denham, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Joe Heck, Daniel Webster, Aaron Schock, and Kevin McCarthy, who is the third ranking GOP leader but represents a lot of Latinos and has expressed support for legal status.



Of course, we hear about a lot of policies a few Republicans support in theory yet mysteriously oppose—it’s a question of voting for an actual bill. But the Republicans on this list could potentially put a lot of pressure on Boehner to allow a vote. And while other House Republicans might not currently face electoral damage for opposing immigration reform, they really should look at demographics and consider their party’s fate in statewide and presidential elections and in the longer term.



Daily Kos



House Democrats pressuring Republicans for immigration reform vote

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Why Democrats Face a Rout in November

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Why Democrats Face a Rout in November

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

TRNN Debate: Is the Democrat"s Talkathon on Climate Change Just Talk?

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



TRNN Debate: Is the Democrat"s Talkathon on Climate Change Just Talk?

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

South Carolina Democrats and Republicans push legislation to “nullify” NSA

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



South Carolina Democrats and Republicans push legislation to “nullify” NSA

Thursday, March 6, 2014

VIDEO: Christie: ‘Our Ideas Are Better Than Their Ideas’







During his address to the 2014 Conservative Political Action Conference, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie called on Republicans to start talking about what they are for rather than what they are against. (Photo: AP)













Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.









To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.







VIDEO: Christie: ‘Our Ideas Are Better Than Their Ideas’

Monday, March 3, 2014

It Is Time, Democrats, to Send Mr. Reid Home

In these ridiculous times, where transparency is clandestine, science proves instead of disproves, and falsely instilled self-esteem trumps real education, I truly don’t expect even the most honest of Liberal or Democrat – and certainly not any Progressive – to understand, or even hear, what I am about to say, but for the good of our country I pray that they do. Truth be told, we rank-and-file Americans cannot trust the “Frank Underwoods” who lurk inside the Washington Beltway – on both sides of the aisle – to do anything on behalf of their constituencies any longer. They are frauds and converts to the oligarch. It is time we start depending on ourselves to affect real, true and honest change.


The examples of just how power-centered and self-serving the oligarchs in the US federal government have become are too many to list, although, if push came to shove, we could start amassing a list, in and of itself worthy of entry into the Guinness Book for longest continuous list of political transgressions against a people. From the IRS coercion of Conservative non-profit groups, to the political payoff that the billion-dollar so-called stimulus was to Blue State governments and labor unions, to the “too-big-to-fail” redistribution of taxpayer dollars through TARP to the über-greedy financial elites for their irresponsible financial skullduggery, the Janus-faced disingenuousness of our elected class – a disingenuousness meant to stave-off the torches and pitchforks of the taxpaying public – knows now shame…and yet we continue to tolerate it.


Stunning. Have we become that self-loathing as a people?


But even while we tolerate the power-hungry manipulations of the elected class – the elitists, the Progressives, the oligarchs – they have always been careful to at least pretend to care about the people. The entire game Progressives play is based on the false-premise that the “better educated” know how to care for the masses better than the masses know how to care for themselves. The illusion foisted by a great many Inside-the-Beltway Republicans (read: establishment Republican…Ann) is that they are standing with and for “the people,” executing a pursuit of limited government, fiscal responsibility and individual freedoms. Yet we all know that government does everything (but for achieving military superiority) poorly and at a greater price than the private-sector. And we all stand witness as government keeps expanding, both in size and scope. Now we can add overt disdain for the American people to that list.


On February 26, 2014, United States Senator and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), stood on the floor of the greatest chamber of debate – or at least what used to be – and openly expressed his hatred for the American people. Once again, abdicating his responsibility to serve his constituents, while playing partisan politics at the expense of the nation, Mr. Reid said, in defending the Patient Protection & Affordable Healthcare Act:


“Despite all that good news, there’s plenty of horror stories being told. All of them are untrue, but they’re being told all over America.”



I will overlook – for the moment – the fact that the most powerful man in the US Senate can’t speak proper English when entering his testimony into the Congressional Record. Lord knows there are members of Congress guilty of more egregious butchery of the English language.


It is beyond dispute that millions of Americans have been adversely affected by this unconstitutional piece of legislation. Millions have been denied the medical insurance they prefer while millions more have been told they must either pay more or go without; left to pay an IRS extracted penalty. Still hundreds of thousands more are being put into life-threatening situations where medical treatment deemed necessary for survival is not either outside their capability to afford, not authorized, or both. The putridly ironic thing about all of this is that the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) was imposed on the American people under the ruse of it being “for the common good.”


To say that Mr. Reid’s comment adds insult to injury is to affect injury to insult. And while it is serving as great fodder for the elitist Washington punditry, it is much more serious an issue than that, and two-fold.


For those whose lives have now been called into question; whose life-saving treatments have become too expensive to afford; or whose treatments have now been denied, this is a direct threat – and a government mandated threat, at that – to the guaranteed right, offered us as US citizens under the bedrock understanding of Natural Law, to “…Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.” While self-serving, power-hungry, elitist manipulators like Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi stare, wax-faced, into the television cameras extolling all of the “common good” that the Affordable Care Act is doing, millions face the prospect of dying for the Progressive Movement’s dream of a one-payer, nationalized health insurance system…health insurance, not healthcare, system.


While this faux benevolence is continuously presented as compassionate, needed and “the right thing” to get behind by the oligarchs and their toadies – the Progressive mainstream media, it is neither compassionate, needed nor the right thing to do. It is a redistribution of wealth that is literally costing people their lives…here…in the “land of the free.”


And what does Mr. Reid say about those who are facing the loss of their lives because of the ACA? What does he say about the real-life, fact-based stories of those who have been denied “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness” because of Progressive benevolence?:


“…Tales…Stories made up from whole cloth…Lies, distorted by Republicans to grab headlines or make political advertisements…”



And as egregiously rancid as this reality is – and it is, the idea that the most powerful man in the US Senate would openly call those facing debilitated health and/or death because of his Progressive ideological zealotry “liars” is not only unacceptable, it should serve as the defining reason for why he should be: a) removed from Senate leadership by his Democrat colleagues immediately; b) reprimanded and censured but the whole of chamber immediately; and c) retired by the people of Nevada at the next election.


Our American system of government was based on the idea that those who would be elected to office – be it at the federal state, county, township or municipal levels – would be understood as those in the service of the public; public servants. Today, this notion – this foundational understanding of our American governmental system – has been grotesquely bastardized , done so with all the Progressive glory that could be mustered in its execution; destroyed at first by expunging the check and balance of States’ Rights through the ratification of the 17th Amendment all the way through to the imposition of having to purchase a private-sector product (health insurance) to be considered a true and faithful American citizen. Our country has been fundamentally transformed…“top-down, bottom-up, inside-out.”


George Washington, a man who could have been king would he have wanted the title, warned – warned – in his Farewell Address of the evils of “factions” (read: political party):


“However combinations or associations of [factions] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people, and to usurp for themselves the reins of government – destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion…


“Let me now…warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party, generally. This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but in those of the popular form it is seen in its greatest rankness and is truly their worst enemy. The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation on the ruins of public liberty.


“Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight) the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and the duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it…”



We, the American people, should not suffer the unbridled arrogance of Mr. Reid, evidenced not only by his lust for partisan faction, but by his open and overt disdain for our fellow citizens; fellow citizens now disenfranchised by the Progressive understanding of “the common good.” Mr. Reid is the perfect example of the “evils of faction.” He is a disgrace to his elected office. He is a disgrace as an American. And he is not suited to his station in the US Senate.


If Democrats in the US Senate – as well as in general – do not seize this moment to make an example of Mr. Reid, then from this day forward let the Democrat Party be known as the toady to the Progressive Movement; the entirety of which is unworthy to lick the heel of Mr. Washington’s boot.


Frank Salvato is the Executive Director for BasicsProject.org a non-partisan, 501(c)(3) research and education initiative focusing on Constitutional Literacy and the threats of Islamofascist jihadism and Progressive neo-Marxism. His writing has been recognized by the US House International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention. His organization, BasicsProject.org, partnered in producing the original national symposium series addressing the root causes of radical Islamist terrorism. He is a member of the International Analyst Network and has been a featured guest on al Jazeera\’s Listening Post, Radio Belgrade One, ITN Production’s Truthloader Program in the UK and on Russia Today. He also serves as the managing editor for The New Media Journal. Mr. Salvato has appeared on The O\’Reilly Factor on FOX News Channel, and was featured in the documentary, “Ezekiel and the MidEast ‘Piece’ Process: Israel’s Neighbor States.” He is the author of the series \”Understanding the Threat of Radical Islam\”, an educational pamphlet series. Mr. Salvato is a regular guest on talk radio including on The Captain\’s America Radio Show, nationally syndicated by the Phoenix Broadcasting and ABC Starguide Satellite Networks, catering to the US Armed Forces around the world. He is also heard weekly on The Roth Show with Dr. Laurie Roth syndicated nationally on the IRN-USA Radio Network. Mr. Salvato’s opinion and analysis have been published by The American Enterprise Institute, The Washington Times, Accuracy in Media, Human Events, and are syndicated nationally. He is a featured political writer for EducationNews.org, BigGovernment.com and Examiner.com and is occasionally quoted in The Federalist.


Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to Technorati



Conservative Daily News



It Is Time, Democrats, to Send Mr. Reid Home

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

ON THE ROAD WITH RAND PAUL, DEMOCRATS SEEK TO NEUTERLIZE OBAMACARE, Gallup poll finds unemployment top American concern, CANTOR BLASTS ISOLATIONISTS


By Ginger Gibson (ggibson@politico.com or @GingerGibson)


ON THE ROAD WITH RAND PAUL – POLITICO’s Katie Glueck spent time in Texas with Sen. Rand Paul: “It’s 7 a.m. on a Saturday, Rand Paul is exhausted and airport security has just confiscated his morning joe. “The TSA took away my coffee,” the libertarian-leaning senator, Houston-bound for a day of events with GOP activists, complains of the federal agency he’s proposed abolishing. “I offered to drink it to show it wasn’t a bomb.”


“The Kentucky Republican has many more sleep-deprived moments in store as he prepares for a near-certain 2016 presidential bid. On an early February political swing through his native Texas, where Paul was joined by a POLITICO reporter, the contradictions and challenges that would define such a run were on vivid display — as was Paul’s belief that his blend of libertarian-infused conservatism could forge an entirely new path to the White House.


“In an extensive in-flight interview, the first-term senator outlined his vision for a more inclusive GOP — only to meet a frosty response hours later when he spoke favorably about immigration to a roomful of people enamored of the tea party’s luminary of the moment, Sen. Ted Cruz.” http://politi.co/1eLOufh


DEMOCRATS, OBAMACARE AND 2014 – POLITICO’s James Hohmann writes: “Democrats know their biggest problem in this year’s midterm election is Obamacare. So top party operatives have settled on a strategy to try blunting the GOP’s advantage: Tell voters Republicans would make the problem worse — raising prescription drug prices, empowering insurance companies and even endangering domestic violence victims.


“The battle plan, details of which were in a memo obtained by POLITICO, recognizes the unpopularity of the Affordable Care Act. But it also banks on voter fatigue with the GOP’s relentless demands for repeal and counts on poll-backed data that show many Americans would rather fix Obamacare’s problems than scrap it altogether.” http://politi.co/1bZ8lYB


– The New York Times’ Ashley Parker looks at some examples: “The ad supporting Representative Ann Kirkpatrick, Democrat of Arizona, opens with a montage of Americana Main Streets, followed by the green fields and dirt roads of the West — the “small towns and wide-open spaces,” the narrator explains, where Ms. Kirkpatrick “listens and learns.”


“His voice remains tranquil even as he turns to a more cutting message about President Obama’s signature health care law: “It’s why she blew the whistle on the disastrous health care website, calling it ‘stunning ineptitude’ and worked to fix it,” he says, before adding, “Ann Kirkpatrick: Seeing what’s wrong, doing what’s right.”


“As Democrats approach the 2014 midterm elections, they are grappling with an awkward reality: Their president’s health care law — passed with no Republican votes — remains a political liability in many states, threatening their ability to hold on to seats in the Senate and the House.” http://nyti.ms/1oJ7vrA


– FLASHBACK: Headline from June 2013 “Democrats 2014 strategy: Own Obamacare” http://politi.co/1gcUFM6


– REPUBLICAN MEGA-DONORS ORGANIZE COUNCIL HEAD OF MIDTERMS: http://politi.co/1fv8Zhn


– NRSC raised $ 4.62 million in January: http://politi.co/1gQpVCe


DOUTH PROTEST TOO MUCH? Rep. Issa was in New Hampshire this weekend – The New Hampshire Union Leader’s Doug Alden reports: “California Republican Darrell Issa opened his speech at Monday night’s Lincoln-Reagan Dinner saying he was not there as a candidate.


“I came here to hopefully shape the debate for 2016 — not join it — but shape it,” the congressman told the audience, which filled a banquet room at the Grappone Center. “I did so in part because over the last five years, I’ve had the distinction and dubious honor of overseeing an administration that doesn’t do the fundamentals of government well — but wants to grow government and expand it in new areas.” http://bit.ly/1gdJFhw


– And so does National Journal’s Billy House: “Rep. Darrell Issa, the bombastic chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee and prominent scourge of liberals everywhere, is in New Hampshire this week.


The 60-year-old Californian is making speeches. He published an op-ed that introduces his life story to Granite State residents. And he’s prompting the obvious question.


“He is not running for president,” said Kurt Bardella, a former Issa congressional aide whose firm, Endeavor Strategic Communications, now handles Issa’s politically related media inquiries.” http://bit.ly/1oLYdLk


CANTOR BLASTS ISOLATIONISTS – Politico Pro’s Austin Wright reports: “Make no mistake: Eric Cantor sides with the strong-on-defense wing of the GOP. In a Presidents Day at the Virginia Military Institute, the House majority leader offers a full-throated rebuke of the “isolationist sentiment” he says caused the United States to hesitate to enter World War II and again threatens to unleash global horrors. http://politi.co/1nI5msQ


DON’T DITCH PAPER YET – The Washington Post’s Lisa Rein reports on the efforts to hold on to good old fashioned paper in an increasingly digital age: “As the Obama administration pushes to do more business over the Internet, finally seeking to close the technology gap with the private sector, the digital makeover is running into a dogged opponent called Consumers for Paper Options.


“The group is working the halls of Congress in closed-door meetings, underwriting research favorable to its position and mounting a news media campaign in an effort to preserve Washington as the capital of paper — and slow the move away from printed checks, forms and other paper communication.”


“The lobbying group has had some recent victories, including language tucked into last month’s budget deal that requires the government to plan for resuming paper delivery of annual Social Security earnings statements to some of the nation’s 150 million future retirees. And it’s been claiming these wins in the name of the elderly and low-income Americans the Internet has left behind.” http://wapo.st/1e2e3so


**A message from POWERJobs: Jobs on our radar this week: Senior Data Modeler at Deloitte, Client Financial Management Analyst at Accenture and Director of Business Development at Evolver.  Interested? Apply to these jobs and more at www.POWERJobs.com; finally, a career site made for YOU!**


GOOD TUESDAY MORNING, FEB. 18, 2014, and welcome to The Huddle, your-play-play preview of all the action on Capitol Hill. Scott is out for the week, so send tips, suggestions, comments, complaints and corrections to ggibson@politico.com. You can also heckle me on Twitter @GingerGibson.


TODAY IN CONGRESS –. The House and Senate have both recessed for the week. The House will meet in pro forma session at 2 p.m., bang the gavel and then get out.


AROUND THE HILL – All is quiet on Capitol Hill.


TRANSITIONS – After three years of wrangling over the farm bill and six years on the Hill, Cullen Schwartz is out as communications director for Sen. Debbie Stabenow. His last day is Wednesday. He heads a few blocks down the street to the USDA where he will start work as a press secretary March 10. His friends are toasting his new gig tonight from 5 to 7 p.m. at The 201 Bar on Mass Avenue.


WHAT MEMBERS WILL HEAR IN THEIR DISTRICTS – A Gallup poll out Monday found unemployment is now the top problem being cited by Americans. The numbers who cite the inability to find a job as their top problem was up 16 percent since January, with 23 percent naming unemployment as the most important problem facing the nation. Unemployment edged out unhappiness with government, politicians and Congress, which previous topped the biggest problem list in the Gallup poll. In fact, Congress and elected officials in Washington slipped to third. General concern about the economy also moved up into second place. The concerns shared bipartisan agreement, with Republicans, Democrats and independents all ranking unemployment and the economy as their top problems. Read the survey here: http://bit.ly/1eKe2cA


The months ahead for the House GOP – The Washington Post’s Robert Costa reports: “After a tumultuous week of party infighting and leadership stumbles, congressional Republicans are focused on calming their divided ranks in the months ahead, mostly by touting proposals that have wide backing within the GOP and shelving any big-ticket legislation for the rest of the year.


“Comprehensive immigration reform, tax reform, tweaks to the federal health-care law — bipartisan deals on each are probably dead in the water for the rest of this Congress.” http://wapo.st/1fv8Vhu


HAPPY ANNIVERSARY STIMULUS – The stimulus would be starting Kindergarten and there is still deep disagreement over what the law meant:


From House Speaker John Boehner’s statement: “The ‘stimulus’ has turned out to be a classic case of big promises and big spending with little results.  Five years and hundreds of billions of dollars later, millions of families are still asking ‘where are the jobs?’  More Americans are living at or below the poverty line.”


House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) also put out a statement: “Five years after the enactment of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, we can see the difference it made in the millions of jobs created and saved and in the small businesses able to survive the economic downturn and invest again for the future.”


MCCONNELL DEFENDS DEBT VOTE – Speaking to reporters in Kentucky, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell defended his vote on the debt deal. Louisville TV station WHAS’s Joe Arnold reports: “Under fire from the tea party for his part in allowing a senate vote to raise the nation’s debt ceiling, U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Friday he had to act in the best interests of the country to avoid default by the United States.


“My job is to protect the country when I can,” McConnell said at a campaign appearance in Louisville, “and to step up and lead on those occasions when it’s required.  That’s what I did.” Read more and watch the video: http://bit.ly/1bZLRXs


DEBT LIMIT AND THE SENATE ­– The New York Times’ Carl Hulse and Jonathan Martin look at the midterm implications of the Senate debt vote: “Senators Mitch McConnell and John Cornyn, two Republican leaders facing primary challenges, knew they would take an immediate political hit from the Republicans’ Tea Party wing by voting to clear the way for a debt-limit increase. They also knew that their willingness to cast that vote would enhance their party’s chances of gaining a majority in the Senate next year.


“It was not an easy exercise, but it keeps the focus on the issues we want it to be on,” said Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, who argued that by putting the debt limit fight behind it last week, his party had robbed Democrats of an opportunity to portray Republicans as reckless. “We dodged a bullet here.”


Democrats acknowledge that the Republican retreat on the debt issue was politically wise and represents yet another factor in the mounting concerns over their own Senate prospects. Democrats are counting on bursts of political extremism to wound Republican candidates. The move by Mr. McConnell, of Kentucky, and Mr. Cornyn, of Texas, showed that at least some Republicans have learned from past defeats.” http://nyti.ms/1bGPkj5


Rep. Thomas Petri (R-Wisc.) calls for investigation into himself – After news articles looking at the Wisconsin Republican’s lobbying, Petri sent a letter to the Ethics Committee requesting they look into the matter. The Hill’s Kristina Wong reports: “In the letter to the House Ethics Committee, the congressman said he was “distressed by the innuendo” that there is a conflict between his personal financial interests and his official actions in Washington.


“To end any questions, I am requesting that the committee formally review the matter and report back,” the letter read.” http://bit.ly/1fbYX8s Read the full letter here: http://bit.ly/1gXXFfZ


Obama thumbs up “Obamacare” moniker: Attention Nancy Pelosi (who has admonished reporters for calling the ACA by any other name), but President Barack Obama once again gave his approval of the health care shorthand. Politico’s Jose Del Real reports: “It may not be polling well, but President Barack Obama isn’t too worried about the Affordable Care Act’s nickname, Obamacare, or the health care law’s impact on his legacy.


“I like it. I don’t mind,” the president told former NBA star Charles Barkley in an interview that aired Sunday about the term Obamacare. “And I tell you, five years from now, when everybody’s saying, ‘Man, I’m sure glad we got health care,’ there are going to be a whole bunch of people who don’t call it Obamacare anymore because they don’t want me to get the credit.”” http://politi.co/1gwPp8r


FRIDAY’S TRIVIA WINNER – Wilfred Codrington was first to correctly answer that William Howard Taft was the president whose wife, Nellie Taft, was the main founder of the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra.


TODAY’S TRIVIA – On this day in 1885, Mark Twain published The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Twain spent one winter working in Washington D.C., including freelancing for several newspapers. Who was he writing for when he penned: “Congress doesn’t know anything about religion… You religious people there are too feeble, in intellect, in morality, in piety—in everything pretty much.” The first person to correctly answer gets a mention in the next day’s Huddle. Email me at ggibson@politico.com.


GET HUDDLE emailed to your Blackberry, iPhone or other mobile device each morning. Just enter your email address where it says “Sign Up.” http://www.politico.com/huddle/


**A message from POWERJobs: Tap into the power of POWERJobs for the newest job opportunities in the Washington area from the area’s top employers, including METRO, Deloitte and AIPAC. Powered by names you trust – POLITICO, WTOP, WJLA/ABC-TV, NewsChannel 8 and Federal News Radio- POWERJOBS is the ultimate career site with more than 2 million job searches and nearly 17,000 applications submitted this year so far. Connect through Facebook or LinkedIn, search jobs by industry and set up job-specific email alerts using www.POWERJobs.com, the site for Washington’s top talent.**




POLITICO – Top 10 – Huddle



ON THE ROAD WITH RAND PAUL, DEMOCRATS SEEK TO NEUTERLIZE OBAMACARE, Gallup poll finds unemployment top American concern, CANTOR BLASTS ISOLATIONISTS

Monday, February 17, 2014

Democrats ready to run with Obamacare



Go ahead and call it Obamacare, says President Obama. And if you’re a Democrat running for re-election, take advantage of Republican disunity and run on fixing the law. Because that’s the approach Democrats all over the country will be taking this cycle, going on offense:

“Part of what we learned in 2010 is that this is a real issue of concern to voters and you can’t dodge it, you have to take it on, and I think Democrats are much more ready and willing to do that in 2014,” said Geoff Garin, a Democratic pollster who has done surveys for Democrats on the law. “We certainly have enough evidence now that this is not a fight you can win if you are in a defensive crouch.”

At the same time, as we’ve seen there’s been plenty of evidence over the last few years to show that the voting public is getting really sick of this fight, that they want Congress to just move on already, fix the law and work on something else for a change. Democrats apparently have finally gotten the message.

“The best way to push back on the attacks we know Republicans will launch over health care is to be on offense about what your opponent would do to health care while highlighting your commitment to fixing and improving the law,” Jesse Ferguson, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s deputy executive director, wrote in the memo. [...]

An internal Democratic poll recently conducted in Montana, where there’s a competitive Senate race, found that 65 percent of voters agree with the statement “we’ve wasted too much time talking about Obamacare and we have other problems to deal with.” Among targeted voters, those deemed as persuadable, 73 percent agreed. Among women, 68 percent agreed and 28 percent disagreed.


Another Democratic poll in a state President Barack Obama carried with a competitive Senate race found two-thirds of voters agreed with the statement: “There are problems with the law, but there are good things — including coverage for preexisting conditions … so no more bankruptcies for medical bills.”



Meanwhile, Republicans are in a tea party mess, with the Ted Cruz wing of the party still in control and still pushing nothing but repeal, a message that only appeals to tea party Republicans. It’s a trap Republicans built for themselves as their primary races get crazier and crazier. They’ll probably be all right with that in their gerrymandered House districts in 2014, but all-repeal-all-the-time isn’t going to win them Senate seats as easily as they assume. Good for Democrats for finally recognizing and embracing that.



Daily Kos



Democrats ready to run with Obamacare

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Hayes Podcast: Obamacare Jobs Numbers are Trouble for Democrats

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Hayes Podcast: Obamacare Jobs Numbers are Trouble for Democrats

Another Dirty Trick: GOP Creates Websites To Fool Democrats Into Giving Them Cash

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Another Dirty Trick: GOP Creates Websites To Fool Democrats Into Giving Them Cash

Thursday, January 30, 2014

VIDEO: Jerry Seib: Obama Pushes Negotiations With Iran







Jerry Seib explains the tensions in Washington over how to keep Iran from building a nuclear weapon. President Obama wants negotiations to go ahead but many in congress see strong sanctions as the only way to prevent a Nuclear Iran. Photo: Charles Dharapak of Associated Press













Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.









To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.







VIDEO: Jerry Seib: Obama Pushes Negotiations With Iran

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

VIDEO: Seib & Co.: Rubio on GOP Future









Sen. Marco Rubio explained to Washington reporters at a Seib & Co. breakfast his hopes for the GOP, saying the party should position itself as the bastion of economic opportunity, upward mobility and fiscal responsibility.













Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.







To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.







VIDEO: Seib & Co.: Rubio on GOP Future

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

VIDEO: State of the Union rebuttals through the years







From Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) to Gov. Bobby Jindal (R-La.), here’s a look at some of the State of the Union rebuttals speeches from the 2000s.













Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.









To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.







VIDEO: State of the Union rebuttals through the years

Sunday, January 19, 2014

Andrea Mitchell On Bridge Controversy: "I Think The Democrats Are Probably Overdoing It"





DAVID GREGORY: And he could have this investigation around for a long while, and that’s what I was asking the assemblyman about.


ANDREA MITCHELL: I mean, I think what he has to focus on is the investigation. He probably should not have gone to Florida and fulfilled that commitment. Because in Florida, if he’s, first of all, behind a gated community with the wealthy, with Ken Langone, who’s also telling the New York Times at the same time he didn’t hire the right people. So, there’s criticism–


DAVID GREGORY: Wait. You’re cautioning about who he’s surrounding himself with, right?


ANDREA MITCHELL: And this is Langone, who wanted him to run in 2012. He was one of his strongest supporters. I think the Democrats are probably overdoing it by following him around and trailing him, looking like they’re piling on. But he’s got to deal with the investigation and make sure that if everything he said is correct, he’s home free. But he’s got to make sure, and there are a lot of emails out there.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Andrea Mitchell On Bridge Controversy: "I Think The Democrats Are Probably Overdoing It"

Monday, December 30, 2013

Howard Dean: Individual Mandate Not Necessary, Will Hurt Democrats





JOE KERNEN: Howard, you’re also expressing concern about — I guess we know that young people, young healthy people, you’re probably not getting enough of them at this point, right?


HOWARD DEAN: It doesn’t really matter that much. Honestly, the actuarial data — this is about the individual mandate. I happen to agree with Joe, the individual mandate was not necessary and it’s probably a big political thing. And that is going to hurt the Democrats because people don’t like to be told what to do by the government no matter what party they’re in. But the truth is, that wasn’t necessary, and the insurance companies like it because it does bring young, healthy people who aren’t likely to get sick into the system. But in our experience, here, although it’s with young people under 18, not with everybody is that the individual mandate is really not that necessary. And the actual data is — does not lead to the conclusion that you’re going to have huge cost overruns for the insurance companies.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Howard Dean: Individual Mandate Not Necessary, Will Hurt Democrats

Friday, December 27, 2013

Democrats plan big push on jobless aid in new year




WASHINGTON Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:48pm EST



U.S. President Barack Obama speaks to military personnel during a Christmas day visit to Marine Corps Base Hawaii in Kaneohe, Hawaii December 25, 2013. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks to military personnel during a Christmas day visit to Marine Corps Base Hawaii in Kaneohe, Hawaii December 25, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque




WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama and Democrats will make a major push when Congress returns January 6 to renew expired benefits for the unemployed and will seek to pressure Republicans over the issue by painting them as uncaring toward the middle class.


Federal unemployment benefits will officially expire for 1.3 million out-of-work Americans on Saturday. With Congress in recess, no last-minute fix is possible.


Democrats have spent much of the holiday week criticizing Republicans for resisting an extension of the emergency jobless aid program, which began in 2008 under President George W. Bush and has been extended every year since then.


The federal benefits kick in once people exhaust their state jobless benefits, which end in many states after 26 weeks.


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has vowed to make an extension of the benefits the top issue in his chamber when Congress returns on January 6.


The issue is part of an economic agenda aimed at winning support from middle-class Americans. Along with the push for an extension of unemployment insurance, Democrats will also push for an increase in the minimum wage.


The renewal of unemployment benefits is expected to face opposition in the Republican-led House of Representatives, but Democrats said this week they are increasingly optimistic about gaining political traction for the issue.


Democrats have been highlighting the personal stories of out-of-work Americans about to be bumped off the unemployment rolls.


PLIGHT OF MOTHERS


An ad running on cable television by the liberal group Americans United for Change accuses Republicans of putting the interests of the wealthy above those of ordinary Americans and spoiling Christmas for the unemployed.


Earlier this week, House of Representatives Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, held a conference call with reporters to highlight the plight of unemployed mothers.


The White House is also hammering the message.


“As the president has repeatedly made clear, it defies economic sense, precedent and our values to allow 1.3 million Americans fighting to find jobs to see their unemployment insurance abruptly cut off – especially in the middle of the holiday season,” Gene Sperling, director of the White House National Economic Council, said in a statement.


Obama, who is spending the holidays in Hawaii with his family, on Friday telephoned Democratic Senator Jack Reed and Republican Senator Dean Heller, the sponsors of a measure that would temporarily extend the federal unemployment benefits.


Congressional Democrats, on the defensive over the botched rollout of Obama’s signature healthcare law, view a focus on economic issues as a chance to improve their prospects in the midterm congressional elections in November.


Reviving a strategy that helped Obama win re-election in 2012, Democrats plan to use Republican resistance to renewing unemployment benefits and raising the minimum wage to portray them as insensitive to the struggles of middle- and lower-income Americans.


CLOCK TICKING


“The clock is ticking, not only for 1.3 million Americans who have been looking for work for longer than six months, but tens of thousands more who each week will lose their unemployment insurance if House Republican leaders don’t agree to put an extension up for a vote,” said Representative Sander Levin, ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee.


Democrats have seized on a comment earlier this month from Republican Senator Rand Paul that extending the unemployment benefits would be a “disservice” to those out of work by giving them less of an incentive to rejoin the workforce more quickly.


Republicans have argued that the federal unemployment benefits were always meant to be temporary and that the program would add to the deficit unless offset by reductions in spending elsewhere in the budget.


“We’re not going to convince (Republicans) substantively that it’s the right thing to do. We have to put political pressure on them,” said Brad Woodhouse, president of Americans United for Change.


The proposal by Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat, and Heller, a Nevada Republican, would extend the federal unemployment benefits for three months.


(Reporting by Caren Bohan; Editing by Fred Barbash, Andrew Hay and Jan Paschal)






Reuters: Politics



Democrats plan big push on jobless aid in new year

Sunday, December 22, 2013

2013 a Lost Year for Democrats?



For Congressional Democrats, the 2013 legislative year began with much promise.


Fresh off President Obama’s decisive re-election and Democratic Party gains in the House and Senate, including in some Republican “red” states, lawmakers averted the so-called fiscal cliff while fulfilling their campaign pledge to raise taxes on the well-off.


Long-elusive legislation on gun control and immigration reform appeared passable, having garnered public and political support after (in the former case) unimaginable tragedy. Obama spoke optimistically about altering the status quo on these issues during his February State of the Union Address. The president also outlined an ambitious second-term agenda that included action on education policy, climate change, job creation, infrastructure, tax reform, and raising the minimum wage.


But Congress ended the year without any of those initiatives signed into law. And given the caution and partisan positioning that typify midterm election years, the 2014 legislative calendar doesn’t hold much promise for liberal reformers. Moreover, the head of the Democratic Party ended the year with the lowest approval ratings of his presidency and mounting credibility questions.


The most significant victory of the session came last week with the passage of a budget –one of the most basic tasks of governing. It will avert a government shutdown for the next two years and ease some of the sequester cuts the president had described in that February speech as a bad way to achieve spending reductions and manage the nation’s business.


When asked at his end-of-the-year news conference Friday whether 2013 was “the worst year” of his presidency, the president demurred, albeit with a knowing smile. “If I look at this past year, there are areas where there have obviously been some frustrations, where I wish Congress had moved more aggressively,” he said. But he also implied that much was lost in 2013, adding that “2014 needs to be a year of action.”


That’s an ambitious — and probably unrealistic — goal, given that this Congress has been described as the least productive in history. It’s especially elusive for Capitol Hill Democrats, who won’t begin the next year the way they did the last: with a popular president and political capital to spend. While some lawmakers still hold out hope for immigration reform and other big-ticket items in 2014, legislation will typically be designed to draw contrasts between the two parties.


Ask Democrats in Congress whether 2013 was a lost year for them, and most answer the way the president does: The party controls the Senate, but has an unwilling partner in a House GOP often overcome by its pesky right flank. Failed negotiations between the president and House Speaker John Boehner have created some ill will between the two parties, and Democrats know anything with the president’s fingerprints is destined to fail in the lower chamber.


“I think we’ve had major accomplishments on things we can do here,” Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown, who won re-election in 2012 in a swing state, told RCP. Brown hopes items left on the table, such as extending long-term unemployment benefits and raising the minimum wage, will get done next year, and he also hopes the president will use his bully pulpit to help. “It’s discouraging we haven’t done those yet, but we’ve got no cooperation from the other side to do it,” he said.


A comprehensive immigration reform bill that included a pathway to citizenship for millions living here illegally passed the Senate with bipartisan support — and brought together members of the business community, evangelicals, and big labor. The Senate also passed the Employee Non-Discrimination Act with the help of some Republicans who had voted against the gay rights bill in the past. And Democrats also saw strides made on gun control, with some bipartisan support for an expanded background check measure, even if the bill didn’t pass the Senate and had no chance in the House. (It did, however, earn a key endorsement from West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, who three years earlier literally turned his shotgun on the cap-and-trade energy bill.) But the House didn’t take up any of these.


Still, “there’s no way you can look back at this year and call it lost,” says Lanae Erickson Hatalsky of the center-left think tank Third Way “There were seeds of progress and we still need to see if we can carry them through.”


“We view 2013 as a huge foundational year for a progressive legislative strategy even if it wasn’t the best year for the presidents’ legislative agenda,” adds Adam Green of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, which helped elect lawmakers such as Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren (who led the charge to derail Obama’s first choice for Federal Reserve chair, Larry Summers). “We’re thinking beyond President Obama, and trying to lay the foundation for big global populist ideas.” Progressives would also count as a positive the fact that lawmakers made no cuts to entitlement benefits through the budgeting process.


Another factor in the stalling of Democratic legislative ambitions was periodic interruptions from developments beyond their control. Lawmakers came back early from a summer recess with calls from the president to approve a military strike on Syria after evidence showed the Assad regime used chemical weapons on its own people. The issue divided Democrats — especially Congressional Black Caucus members otherwise supportive of the president.


The strike was put on hold when Syria accepted a Russian-brokered plan to destroy its chemical weapons, and the politics subsided when the debate shifted once again to funding the government and raising the debt ceiling. In October, the government shut down for the first time in 20 years after Republicans insisted on defunding or delaying the health care law. The GOP took a major hit in the polls as a result, and Democrats had seemingly found their top midterm line of attack.


But political opportunity quickly shifted with the bungled rollout of Obamacare. In the wake of Americans getting pushed off their health insurance plans after being told that wouldn’t happen, even loyal defenders of the law called for the president to make adjustments that, to some extent, would undermine it. While sign-up glitches have diminished and enrollment numbers are increasing, the issue remains a difficult one for Democrats.


Republicans were also united by what they viewed as heavy-handed tactics by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Though the year ended with a budget deal that produced a glimmer of hope for productivity next year, the last weeks of the legislative session were marked by turbulence in the upper chamber. Shortly before the Thanksgiving recess, Reid engineered a change in filibuster rules to require only a simple majority to confirm executive nominees. (The confirmation of dozens of appointees had been stalled for many months.) That action, however, fired up Republicans, who led the chamber into other late-night stalling sessions in the final weeks of the year.


“I hope that one of the majority leader’s New Year’s resolutions is going to be to operate the Senate in a quite different manner,” said Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who is running for re-election next year with challenges on both his right and left. “It’s going to be hard to get the Senate back to normal.”


Reid, who was hospitalized briefly last week for what doctors determined was exhaustion, said he will begin the year with efforts to extend the unemployment benefits, though there is little appetite for that issue among Republicans. Democrats are also working on minimum wage legislation, which he said will be a top priority.


“I hope what we do is get back to doing legislation bill by bill,” Reid said. “That’s what we’ve done in the past. We haven’t done it in the last few years because there’s been too much obstruction. Otherwise . . . if the Republicans continue this, we’re just shoveling to the executive branch ever more power.” 




RealClearPolitics – Articles



2013 a Lost Year for Democrats?

Sunday, December 15, 2013

Gingrich to Reich: Every City in Poverty is Run by Democrats

Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Clinton administration Labor Secretary Robert Reich debated the causes of poverty in America on Sunday, with each blaming the other’s political party for the problem.

Appearing as a panelist on ABC’s “This Week,” Gingrich noted that the GOP should “rethink some of its indifference to the very poor.” He also said Democrats should ask themselves after 50 years of the war on poverty if government isn’t fixing the problem.


Panelist Reich countered that President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty was successful for a time.


“What has happened, however, over the last 30 years is that much of the, much of the ardor, much of the concern, much of the, what propelled that war on poverty has dissipated,” Reich said.


“I think it has something to do, perhaps, with the intransigence of the Speaker’s party,” Reich continued, “because every time there was a jobs bill, every time there was an effort to expand a low income housing, every time there was an effort to provide better opportunities for young people. We’re talking about equal opportunity.”


“This is baloney,” Gingrich interrupted. “Every major city which is a center of poverty is run by Democrats. Every major city. Their policies have failed …”


Reich went on to note that long-time New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is not a Democrat. (Bloomberg first served as a moderate Republican, but later became an independent.)


“Newt, I am surprised you are not taking responsibility here,” Reich said.


© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Gingrich to Reich: Every City in Poverty is Run by Democrats