Showing posts with label Think. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Think. Show all posts

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Most of What You Think You Know About Milk Is Probably Dairy Industry Lies



The powerful dairy lobby has been spreading dangerous health claims about milk for decades.








Got milk allergy? Many people including Native Americans and people of Asian, African and South American descent are lactose intolerant and can’t and don"t drink milk. That is the way nature made them over epochs and no one ever died of a dairy deficiency.



But there is money in dairy. That is why American fast food companies try to bring the love of dairy to cultures where it traditionally hasn"t existed. And that is why the National Dairy Promotion and Research Board and the National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board in the US disseminate “educational” materials that address “misconceptions about lactose intolerance” according to research in Born With a Junk Food Deficiency, How Flaks, Quacks, and Hacks Pimp the Public Health. The marketing groups bragged to Congress that they regularly assure people in such ethnic groups that their lactose intolerance “should not be a barrier to including milk in the diet,” in an ongoing effort to help US dairy farmers. Ka-ching.


Battling “misconceptions” about lactose intolerance is only one of many marketing campaigns by the dairy lobby. Since the 1990s, the National Dairy Promotion and Research Board and the National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board have partnered with the USDA to push milk drinking, which had been falling since the 1970s, especially among teens and tweens. The promotions even have included partnerships with fast-food restaurants like Wendy’s and McDonald’s, who would seem unlikely comrades for a government agency sworn to protect the public health.


The milk campaigns began in the early 1990s with the catchphrase “Milk: It Does a Body Good” and used top model Tyra Banks and musician Marc Anthony to push milk for strong bones. “One in five victims of osteoporosis is male,” said the Banks ads. “Don’t worry. Calcium can help prevent it.” “Shake it, don’t break it. Want strong bones?” said the Anthony ad.  “Drinking enough lowfat milk now can help prevent osteoporosis later.” The ads were targeted toward African Americans, Latinos and men though all of the groups are among the least likely to get osteoporosis!


Next, the dairy lobby promoted milk as a treatment for premenstrual syndrome or PMS. Television ads showed bumbling boyfriends and husbands rushing to the store for milk to detoxify their stricken women. The ads disappeared as it became evident the study on which the campaign was based credited calcium not milk with helping PMS. And calcium is found in many sources besides milk–including the calcium-fortified juices that the milk ads are designed to sell against. Oops.


Then milk marketers tried to portray milk as a diet food that would help people lose weight until the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Bureau of Consumer Protection told them to cease “until further research provides stronger, more conclusive evidence of an association between dairy consumption and weight loss.”


Susan Ruland, spokesperson for the National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board, begged to differ. “There’s a strong body of scientific evidence that demonstrates a connection between dairy and weight loss,” she said, although she promised that future ads would comply. After the FTC clampdown, marketing materials claimed that low-fat dairy products do not necessarily add weight and may have “certain nutrients that can help consumers meet dietary requirements”–pretty much the definition of “food” when you think about. Soon the ads “went negative” and read, “Soft drinks and other sweetened beverages are now the leading source of calories in a teen’s diet and these nutrient-void beverages are increasingly taking the place of milk.” Take that!


The factually-challenged campaigns did not made a dent in posters of mustache-wearing actors, sports figures, musicians and models shipped to 60,000 US elementary schools and 45,000 middle schools in outrageous promotion of private industry by the government. In-school milk promotions have included  the “Healthiest Student Bodies,” which promised students they could win an iPod, Fender guitar and other prizes if they visited the milk marketing site. And students at three California high schools got a chance to create their own “Got Milk?” campaigns to sell milk to their peers and win a $ 2,000, an all-expense-paid trip to San Francisco to present their ideas to the milk advertising agency.


Needless to say, milk is hardly a health food that the government should be promoting to children. It is linked to obesity, cholesterol and other life-long health problems. Mega dairies are also notorious for environmental, worker and animal abuse and often called “environmental crack houses.”


Of course, in addition to its marketing efforts with the USDA, the dairy industry has rolled out products and supplements that help people with lactose intolerance “enjoy all the great taste of dairy and avoid the discomfort,” and drink more milk. Now, Big Pharma is joining in the dairy industry"s decades-long history of recruiting more milk drinkers with specious marketing.  Big Pharma now suggests that people can overcome their milk allergy by taking a genetically altered drug that is linked to cancers and deaths!


The drug Xolair, omalizumab, a member of an immune-suppressing class of drugs, reduced symptoms of milk allergies said researchers at the recent American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology annual meeting. “I think the evidence is pretty strong that it does make a significant difference,” said a coauthor of the research, Hugh Sampson, MD of Mount Sinai Hospital who reports eight financial links to Big Pharma companies.


Xolair and other recombinant DNA-derived monoclonal antibody drugs like Cimzia, Enbrel, Humira and Remicade can make as much as $ 10,000 to $ 20,000 a year per patient for Big Pharma. In patients who actually need them, like those with autoimmune diseases, they are important drugs. But since the “MoAbs” debuted, it has been a race to the bottom for Big Pharma to find everyday conditions which could justify prescribing the expensive, injected drugs.


Remember how antipsychotic drugs like Seroquel, approved for schizophrenia, soon became drugs of choice for every day depression and the “blues”? That is the same marketing plan for MoAbs (called “indication creep”) which are now marketed for everyday asthma, skin conditions, indigestion and now, apparently food allergies. If private and government health insurers want to fork over millions for the bio-engineered Franken drugs which are “meddling with Mother Nature,” according to the People"s Pharmacy that merely loots tax dollars and raises insurance premiums. But the drugs also kill.


MoAbs cause TB, cancers and super infections according to their labels because they suppress the immune system. Xolair was investigated by the FDA for links to heart attack and stroke and 77 people who took Xolair had life-threatening allergic responses in a year and a half, according to FDA reports. This is a drug to treat milk allergies?


There is also a shadow over Xolair’s clinical trials. They were conducted at Vivra which was investigated twice by the FDA for procedural irregularities. Trials of Xolair and at least seven other drugs were corrupted by protocol violations and outright falsifications, according to a former clinical research subinvestigator who worked at the facility. San Mateo, Calif.-based Vivra Asthma & Allergy was the nation’s largest respiratory disease physician practices until a merger with Lakewood, Colo.-based Gambro in 1997 and with El Segundo, Calif.-based DaVita in 2005.


Once again Pharma has a dangerous, expensive drug that almost no one needs and is creating lame and contrived uses. And once again the dairy industry will sink as low as it needs to, to sell product. Does anyone believe someone should tamper with their immune system just to drink milk? Except, of course, Big Pharma and the dairy industry?




 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



Most of What You Think You Know About Milk Is Probably Dairy Industry Lies

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

How To Think About The Origins Of The American Surveillance State

At Those Damn Liars, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Those Damn Liars and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Those Damn Liars makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Those Damn Liars does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Those Damn Liars.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Those Damn Liars and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Those Damn Liars send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Those Damn Liars has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Those Damn Liars"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


How To Think About The Origins Of The American Surveillance State

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Do Americans Think War In Afghanistan Was A Mistake?

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Do Americans Think War In Afghanistan Was A Mistake?

Monday, February 24, 2014

Picture Talking Points (1).....What do you think?

At Hey WTF? News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Hey WTF? News and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Hey WTF? News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Hey WTF? News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Hey WTF? News.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Hey WTF? News and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Hey WTF? News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Hey WTF? News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Hey WTF? News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Picture Talking Points (1).....What do you think?

Saturday, February 22, 2014

Americans still think there’s more to learn about Benghazi – and want Congress to keep searching for the truth


Benghazi embassy post-attack


Americans across the political spectrum aren’t entirely convinced that the truth aboutthe Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya has been fully uncovered, and think Congress should continue investigating the matter to find out whether the White House acted improperly during its handling of the attack, a Fox News poll released Friday reported. 


The poll found that two in three Americans – including 50 percent of Democrats – believe that Congress should continue to investigate the White House’s role in managing the attack, which resulted in the deaths of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. Just 31 percent of Americans think Congress should move on from its Benghazi investigations.


House Republicans, led by Government and Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), have ferociously led the charge to continue the investigation, even going so far as to set up a website earlier this month that promises to bring the facts about the assault “straight to the American people.”


“The families of the fallen – and the American people – deserve to know the truth. They deserve justice,” a release issued by House Speaker John Boehner’s (R-Ohio) said. “After being stonewalled, House committees began a serious, exhaustive, and deliberate investigation into what led up to this tragic event, what transpired, and why the White House refused – and still refuses – to tell the whole truth.”


Benghazi will also be a key issue in the 2016 presidential race, as presumed Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s political future hangs on the balance of any potential investigation. Clinton was serving as Secretary of State for President Barack Obama at the time of the attack, and recently acknowledged in a speech before the National Automotive Dealers Association that her role in the scandal is her biggest political regret. 


“My biggest, you know, regret is what happened in Benghazi,” she said. “It was a terrible tragedy, losing four Americans, two diplomats and, now it’s public, so I can say two CIA operatives.”


At the same time, many in the mainstream media continue to doubt that there is any controversy surrounding the attack at Benghazi – especially when compared to real scandals like “Bridgegate.” HBO talk show host Bill Maher asserted on his show Friday evening that Benghazi isn’t a scandal at all, as he tried to convince MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow that her network might want to dial back its coverage of “Bridgegate” before the issue becomes its “Benghazi.”


Addressing a ‘break-up letter’ he penned to the liberal cable news network on Valentine’s Day, Maher said, ”I should have said that… yes, [Bridgegate] is not the same as Benghazi. I made that analogy, but I said this is your ‘Benghazi’. Benghazi is a real – Benghazi is nothing – there is no scandal there. This [Bridgegate] is an actual scandal.”


Fox News surveyed 1,006 registered voters nationwide via telephone from Feb. 9-11, 2014. The study has a margin of error of +/- 3 percentage points. 




Red Alert Politics



Americans still think there’s more to learn about Benghazi – and want Congress to keep searching for the truth

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

GOP Debt Limit Hostage-Taking - It"s Even Worse Than You Think

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



GOP Debt Limit Hostage-Taking - It"s Even Worse Than You Think

Sunday, January 19, 2014

Andrea Mitchell On Bridge Controversy: "I Think The Democrats Are Probably Overdoing It"





DAVID GREGORY: And he could have this investigation around for a long while, and that’s what I was asking the assemblyman about.


ANDREA MITCHELL: I mean, I think what he has to focus on is the investigation. He probably should not have gone to Florida and fulfilled that commitment. Because in Florida, if he’s, first of all, behind a gated community with the wealthy, with Ken Langone, who’s also telling the New York Times at the same time he didn’t hire the right people. So, there’s criticism–


DAVID GREGORY: Wait. You’re cautioning about who he’s surrounding himself with, right?


ANDREA MITCHELL: And this is Langone, who wanted him to run in 2012. He was one of his strongest supporters. I think the Democrats are probably overdoing it by following him around and trailing him, looking like they’re piling on. But he’s got to deal with the investigation and make sure that if everything he said is correct, he’s home free. But he’s got to make sure, and there are a lot of emails out there.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Andrea Mitchell On Bridge Controversy: "I Think The Democrats Are Probably Overdoing It"

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

What Most People Think They Know About Marijuana Is Unscientific, Paranoid and Even Racist Propaganda



Don"t believe the marijuana hype.








This article first appeared at The Fix, with coverage on addiction and recovery, straight up. 


Everyone thinks they know something about drugs—whether from personal experience or from 8th grade prevention classes or simply because the media presents so many stories about them. Unfortunately, most of what people think they know is inaccurate, and comes from years of government war-on-drugs propaganda, with little understanding of itsmedical and historical context.


Take some of the recent absurd anti-marijuana columns and tweets from some of the backbones of the media establishment: the New York Times’ David Brooks, Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post and Tina Brown, former New Yorker editor and founder of the Daily Beast.  


Both Brooks and Marcus told stories of their own youthful pot smoking—neither of which seems to have led to any lasting negative consequences as is the case for the overwhelming majority of marijuana users. Yet both claimed—without apparently understanding that relying on a single study that has been questioned in a follow up by the same journal is not accurately reporting “fact”—that marijuana definitively lowers IQ.  


And neither mentioned the elephant in the room: the fact that marijuana laws are mainly enforced against black people and that arresting millions and saddling them with criminal records hasn’t prevented around half of the adult population (white and black) from trying weed. It has, however, meant that black people have reduced opportunities to get jobs with organizations like the Times or the Post while Brooks and Marcus never faced arrest.


Conveniently, the columnists also left out the fact that countries like Portugal that have decriminalized marijuana (or countries like Holland that tolerate some commercial sales of marijuana) actually havelower rates of youth drug use than we do.


Meanwhile, Tina Brown also tweeted that marijuana makes people stupid and legalization will reduce our ability to compete with China. Suffice it to say that she has little evidence for such a claim—one might argue based on equally flimsy data that it enhances creativity and popular culture, which is one of our true strengths—but that wouldn’t sound appropriately “serious.”


And right there is the problem: columnists and journalists who write about drugs rarely question conventional wisdom or go beyond cherry-picking of data to support what they already “know.”


But why are we so gullible in this area, when reporters are supposed to be skeptical? One reason has got to be the fact that over the last 40 years, the government has spent billions of dollars on advertising and even planted media articles and messages in TV shows aiming to get us all to “just say no.” While these campaigns are often ineffective at preventing use, they do seem to work at clouding perception.


And the truth is seen as immaterial in the drug war. Written into the job description of the “drug czar” by Congress is that whoever heads the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) must “take such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use of a substance (in any form)” that is currently illegal, regardless of the facts. When asked about its distribution of “misleading information”—by a Congressman, in fact—ONDCP cited this provision to justify doing so, saying that this is “within the statutory role assigned to ONDCP.” In other words, they have to lie.


Rare is the journalist who will admit to having fallen for this outright propaganda, which is why last year’s confession by CNN’s chief medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta that he was wrong about marijuana was so stunning.


On CNN’s website, he wrote:


I mistakenly believed the Drug Enforcement Agency listed marijuana as a schedule 1 substance because of sound scientific proof. Surely, they must have quality reasoning as to why marijuana is in the category of the most dangerous drugs that have “no accepted medicinal use and a high potential for abuse.”


They didn"t have the science to support that claim, and I now know that when it comes to marijuana neither of those things are true. It doesn"t have a high potential for abuse, and there are very legitimate medical applications.


The truth is that our perceptions of marijuana—and in fact all of our drug laws—are based on early 20th century racism and “science” circa the Jim Crow era. In the early decades of the 20th century, the drug was linked to Mexican immigrants and black jazzmen, who were seen as potentially dangerous.


Harry Anslinger, the first commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (an early predecessor of the DEA), was one of the driving forces behind pot prohibition. He pushed it for explicitly racist reasons, saying, “Reefer makes darkies think they"re as good as white men,” and: 


“There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others.”


The main reason to prohibit marijuana, he said was “its effect on the degenerate races.” (And god forbid women should sleep with entertainers!)


Although it sounds absurd now, it was this type of propaganda that caused the drug to be outlawed in 1937—along with support from the Hearst newspapers, which ran ads calling marijuana “the assassin of youth” and published stories about how it led to violence and insanity. Anslinger remained as head of federal narcotics efforts as late as 1962, whereafter he spread his poisonous message to the world as the American representative to the U.N. for drug policy for a further two years.


Before marijuana was made illegal, the American Medical Association’s opposition to prohibition was ignored, as was an earlier report on marijuana in India by the British government, which did not find marijuana to be particularly addictive or dangerous. That “Indian Hemp Drugs Committee” reporthad concluded way back in 1894 that, “The moderate use of hemp drugs is practically attended by no evil results at all.”  


Pundits and columnists who make pronouncements about marijuana’s dangers seem willfully ignorant of this history, which is easy to check via any online search engine. Its seems unlikely that Brooks, Marcus and Brown would want their names associated with a law that is both explicitly racist in intent—and continuingly racist in outcome.


But until we treat drug issues as medical and scientific questions, we will be doomed to continue this bigoted legacy—and we will not be able to treat addiction as the health issue that it is.


So, just say know when it comes to drugs—and be sure what you know is based in science, not ancient biased nonsense. (Though, on second thought, Anslinger may have had a point about the inadvisability of sexual relations with entertainers, particularly musicians.)


For a weekly roundup of news and developments in the drug reform movement and the injustices stemming from prohibition,  sign up to receive  AlterNet"s Drugs Newsletter here. Make sure to scroll down to “Drugs” and subscribe. Also, please check out the new AlterNet Drugs page on Facebook. Thanks for reading!





Maia Szalavitz is a columnist at The Fix. She is also a health reporter at Time magazine online, and co-author, with Bruce Perry, of Born for Love: Why Empathy Is Essential—and Endangered (Morrow, 2010), and author of Help at Any Cost: How the Troubled-Teen Industry Cons Parents and Hurts Kids (Riverhead, 2006). 





 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



What Most People Think They Know About Marijuana Is Unscientific, Paranoid and Even Racist Propaganda

Friday, December 20, 2013

Why I Think Arguing About Gay Marriage as a Slippery Slope to Polygamy Is a Bad Idea




I recently received a challenge of sorts on my Facebook wall from a longtime friend, who wanted me to talk about the “Sister Wives” court ruling in Utah, concerning polygamy.


Turns out, though, that the ruling is favorable less to the prospects of polygamy than to the right to privacy of what amounts to “religious cohabitation.”


Those who oppose same-gender marriage often put forward polygamy as a possible result should we begin down the slippery slope that leads away from “traditional marriage.” Since I have long been an advocate of same-gender marriage, I guess my friend believed that this Utah case about polygamy would reveal the lack of consistency in my argument, showing me to be another one of those crazy libertines whose morality is probably made up on the fly and is tied to nothing more substantial than personal preference.


I get people trying to catch me out on this kind of stuff all the time. So, in contravention of my long held practice of not arguing these kinds of things on social media, I broke down and responded … mostly about why I think this kind of argument isn’t usually very productive.


Here’s what I said:


I will make this one exception to my rule about not engaging in these kinds of Facebook discussions out of respect for our friendship, __________.


One reason I avoid them is because it has been my experience that people want less to discuss an issue with me than to try to goad me into some kind of argument. I will operate in this case on the supposition that your intentions are better than that.


Another reason I avoid this kind of discussion is because of the problem of incommensurability–that is, we start with assumptions that cannot be reconciled. You appear to operate out of the popular Enlightenment assumption that there is such a thing as an absolute truth that is accessible to human beings in some unmediated form, which exists prior to any philosophical or theological commitments–and which is somehow tied to “bedrock principle borne out through centuries of history and embraced by civilization for time immemorial.” (If I read you wrongly here, please correct me.)


I, on the other hand, don’t believe that there is any absolute truth to which human beings have unmediated access–and by unmediated, I mean that all the truths we claim are conditioned by language, culture, tradition, etc., and are therefore subject to human interpretation. (Notice, I didn’t necessarily commit myself to the position that there are no universal truths–only that, to the extent that there are, we are never going to agree on just what they are and on what implications they may have for us. So, as a practical matter, arguing about them quickly deteriorates into assertions of personal preference–though, of course, those engaged in such a discussion would be loathe to admit it. I don’t think that cuts us loose from all moorings, leaving us floating in a vast sea of relativism, but my explanation for that is an essay, not a Facebook post.)


Now, someone might object here by saying, “Yes, but the Bible, isn’t it absolute truth, binding on everyone?” I would respond to that by saying, first, the Bible never makes the claim of absolute truth for itself. Again, let me be careful: the Bible claims to contain the words of God, which–even were I to stipulate that they rise as close to the level of absolute truth as anything else–doesn’t relieve its interpreters of the responsibility of trying to make sense of them. Therefore, second, and needless to say, there is no uncontroversial interpretation of even the words of God–either through the prophets or the words of Jesus himself–let alone the rest of the Bible. As one rabbi said to me, “Y’all do things with our books that even we don’t do.”


My reference to the “God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob” not finding polygamy overly objectionable sounds like a flippant throw away line, meant to divert attention away from the fact that I didn’t set down a lengthier argument. However, that little line is my point in a nutshell. You claim a “bedrock principle” that persists from “time immemorial.” The problem with that statement, however, is that there exists a time we can remember when God was apparently much less concerned about polygamy than you appear to be–indicating that there is no enduring “bedrock principle” that withstands the test of time, as you claim. In point of fact, marriage–at least as traced back through the Abrahamic tradition–is a much more fluid set of arrangements than you seem to allow.


So, here’s another reason I generally steer clear of these kinds of encounters: though I tell you why I think easy references to marriage as some sort of historical institutional monolith don’t work, it will not sway you–since you operate from a set of foundational principles I don’t share. I don’t say that as slight, but merely as an observation of how this sort of thing works. You don’t find my arguments compelling, and I don’t find yours compelling because we start with different assumptions about how we arrive at truth. So after this exchange, we will both have spoken our minds at some length, and no one who happens upon this thread will be persuaded from the beliefs that that person brought to this conversation in the first place. (And by this time, I’ve publicly rehearsed my position on this topic enough that I’m not particularly enthusiastic about doing it again.)


The other reason I try not to get baited into having this discussion is because I think for those people who follow Jesus there are more important discussions to have. To rephrase a line from Tony Campolo, I think polygamy is an issue used by comparatively wealthy American Christians to distract themselves from the fact that they drive Mercedes Benzes–an issue about which the prophets and Jesus had a great deal to say. I’m not accusing you of this because, as you say, I don’t want to put myself in the position of “judging [your] motives.” However, it is my experience that slippery slope arguments about things like polygamy and incest and pederasty (aside from being offensive to people who love one another, but who happen to share the same gender) are sufficiently marginal arguments, the practical effect of which is to sidetrack us from issues of poverty and injustice with which we have some reasonable expectation of coming in contact and over which we actually have some agency.


So, I’m happy to talk about our kids, or how your practice is going, or how my goofy life is going–but I’ve discussed this one about as much as I’m going to discuss it.



Follow Derek Penwell on Twitter: www.twitter.com/reseudaimon




Politics – The Huffington Post



Why I Think Arguing About Gay Marriage as a Slippery Slope to Polygamy Is a Bad Idea

Friday, December 13, 2013

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://img.youtube.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/0.jpg


Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://img.youtube.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/0.jpg


Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://img.youtube.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/0.jpg


Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/mqdefault.jpg


Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://img.youtube.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/0.jpg


Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/mqdefault.jpg


Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://img.youtube.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/0.jpg


Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/mqdefault.jpg


Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

What do Julian Assange"s Friends think about The Fifth Estate?

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



What do Julian Assange"s Friends think about The Fifth Estate?

Saturday, August 24, 2013

How to Think About the Nasdaq Freeze


• Invalid email address.


• You can’t enter more than 20 emails.


• Seperate multiple addresses with Commas.


• Must enter an email address.


• You must enter the verification code below to send.


• Invalid entry: Please type the verification code again.




WSJ.com: Opinion



How to Think About the Nasdaq Freeze