Showing posts with label Hilarious. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hilarious. Show all posts

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Conservatives" Hilarious, Doomed Efforts to Be Cool

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Conservatives" Hilarious, Doomed Efforts to Be Cool

Conservatives" Hilarious, Doomed Efforts to Be Cool



Nothing is less cool than trying too hard to be cool.








Conservatives have a problem with cool. If they were smart, right-wing pundits and Republican political consultants would just ignore the whole concept of cool. Being conservative is inherently uncool, since the whole point of conservatism is to reject the forward-looking and liberated attitude that has always defined cool. Worrying much about it is just a waste of time. Trying to be cool just makes you look ridiculous, and paradoxically, more uncool. It’s a no-win situation, and yet conservatives continue taking the bait, forever trying to get this whole concept of cool to work for them and always, always failing.


The latest example of the Republicans trying to figure out to work this cool thing and failing is an ad campaign running in 14 states with Senate campaigns in 2014 that shows Scott Greenberg, a 30-year-old Audi driver saying things like he is “ticked off at politicians” for passing regulations, which he believes are the source of unemployment. We are clearly meant to believe that Greenberg is a hipster, demonstrating the infallible conservative ability to hop on any trend right after it’s run out of steam. Greenberg wears a striped shirt and glasses and has a scraggly beard, but sadly for Scott Greenberg and his benefactors, none of that does much to conceal the eau de dweeb that hovers over anyone who takes seriously the idea that wealthy businessmen are the major oppressed class of America.


It’s hard to see why Republicans even bother. Even if it were possible to trick young voters into thinking you can vote Republican and still be cool, it isn’t really necessary. It’s not like the millennial crowd is dweeb-free, for one thing. For another, the usual tactics of using catchphrases like “small government” and “personal responsibility” to cover up race-baiting pandering to white people is working pretty well on white millennials, though perhaps not quite as well as it did on white people before.


No, it’s safe to say that this attempt to be cool is less about really peeling off votes from the Democrats. No, this is about something deeper, a long-standing jealousy and resentment of the left for being a giant vacuum that sucks up all the cool people, leaving behind the right. (Let’s be clear, by no means am I saying all Democrats are cool. They have their fair share of dorks and dweebs. But it is, and many Republicans are keenly aware of this, true that most cool people are pretty liberal. It just comes with the territory.) This creates a major insecurity on the right, and periodically there are embarrassing attempts to deal with it by asserting, laughably, that they have cool people on their side of the aisle, too. It’s painful to watch.


The “nuh-uh, we’re cool, too!” thing has a long and sordid history on the right. Take Andrew Sullivan’s embarrassing attempt to coin the phrase “South Park Republican” in 2001, to describe the younger and cooler form of Republican that was supposedly emerging at the time, and was characterized by being into the show South Park, or at least the worst part of the show, which was its tendency to devolve into half-baked reactionary moralizing from the perspective of writers who clearly didn’t understand the issues. Even the conservative website Daily Caller had to admit recently that “South Park Republicans” had no traction, calling them the “political equivalent of a dodo bird,” which is overgenerous. Roy Edroso more correctly called it more of a fantasy than a reality, pointing out that even at its strongest, South Park Republicanism was straight-laced and more concerned with policing “morality” than letting loose and having fun.


It’s the same urge that, among the Christian right, leads to Christian rock and churches like Mars Hill in Seattle, where the pastor attempts to fool you into thinking he’s cool because he rocks a beard and likes rock music, but you find out at the end of the day, he’s just selling the same old fundamentalism as the more buttoned-up crew.


This is a more secular version of the same urge, and frequently leads to conservatives identifying as “libertarian” without having any meaningful policy differences from the same old Republicans of yore. In the media, it leads to unconvincing attempts to craft hip, bold, young conservative voices—like S.E. Cupp or Greg Gutfeld—that don’t really seem to be fooling anyone except the cranky old conservative audience that can’t really tell the difference. (Gutfeld, at least, has decided to embrace his lack of cool, writing a new book called Not Cool: The Hipster Elite and Their War On You, where he takes another tack of trying to pretend that he wasn’t into that whole “cool” thing anyway.)


But where these attempts to make conservative cool reliably come across as the most pathetic is in the realm of rock music, the great white whale of the right. Conservatives, particularly Baby Boomers, have never really gotten over the fact that they were on the wrong side of the "60s. Witness the insistence on calling CPAC—or the Bakersfield conference or the Tea Party—“Woodstock for conservatives.” Woodstock happened 45 years ago, and clearly the right is still upset that they weren’t a part of it. This, too, explains how, no matter how outrageous or racist or sexually predatory Ted Nugent gets, Republicans can’t let him go or stop using him in fundraising. He’s a rock-and-roller, really the only one they’ve got, so they’re clinging to him like a barnacle on a sinking ship. The only other option is pulling a Chris Christie and following Bruce Springsteen around, trying to make him validate you even though he’s clearly not having it. (Witness the saddest non-serious headline in possibly all of the 21st century: “Chris Christie hopes Bruce Springsteen will be his friend someday.”)


If conservatives were smart, they’d simply ignore cool altogether and go golfing and spend money and simply give up any hope of being cool whatsoever. That strategy of indifference worked for Ronald Reagan. Say what you will about him, he seemed perfectly content to be himself in all his utterly out-of-touch glory, and he was all the more popular for it. The current strategy of being all hung up about it, and desperately casting around for something, anything, that shows that Republicans can be cool, too, only ends up backfiring. After all, nothing is less cool than trying too hard to be cool, and failing.  


 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



Conservatives" Hilarious, Doomed Efforts to Be Cool

Monday, January 20, 2014

‘SNL’ goes after anti-pot advocates in hilarious skit

‘SNL’ goes after anti-pot advocates in hilarious skit
http://watchdog.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-print/images/printer_famfamfam.gif


By   /   January 20, 2014  /   No Comments



Please, feel free to “steal our stuff”! Just remember to credit Watchdog.org. Find out more




Watchdog.org




Read more about ‘SNL’ goes after anti-pot advocates in hilarious skit and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Monday, December 23, 2013

From horrendous to hilarious: 2013"s media mistakes and corrections

New York Post fingers 17 year old kid as bombing suspect

Poynter has rounded up the best and worst media errors and corrections of 2013, and there are some doozies. At the top of the list is a big one: The 60 Minutes Benghazi story and CBS’ failure to quickly acknowledge the story’s flaws and come clean in a real way. They aired a false story rife with conflicts of interest, they had to be forced to admit there was anything wrong, and the internal investigation of what went wrong wasn’t independent. It’s brutal.

Poynter doesn’t mention it, but while some news organizations like the New York Times and the Washington Post uncovered the problems with the story, Fox News went silent, not mentioning the retraction of a story they’d given blanket coverage when it was first (mis)reported.


Poynter’s runner up points a finger at another piece of Rupert Murdoch’s empire: the New York Post‘s infamous “bag men” cover, which identified two teenagers as suspects in the Boston Marathon bombings—teenagers who were entirely unconnected to the bombings and were not being sought by the FBI.


But while the big missed stories produce teeth-grinding rage, there’s also a world of funny corrections to highlight. For instance, Poynter’s runner-up for apology of the year, from The Sun:


In an article on Saturday headlined ‘Flying saucers over British Scientology HQ’, we stated “two flat silver discs” were seen “above the Church of Scientology HQ”. Following a letter from lawyers for the Church, we apologise to any alien lifeforms for linking them to Scientologists.


Slate had the runner-up correction of the year:

An earlier version of the Carlos Danger Name Generator suggested incorrectly that the Carlos Danger Name for Anthony Weiner is Armando Catastrophe. The Carlos Danger Name for Anthony Weiner is Carlos Danger.

Poynter has many more.



Daily Kos



From horrendous to hilarious: 2013"s media mistakes and corrections

From horrendous to hilarious: 2013"s media mistakes and corrections

New York Post fingers 17 year old kid as bombing suspect

Poynter has rounded up the best and worst media errors and corrections of 2013, and there are some doozies. At the top of the list is a big one: The 60 Minutes Benghazi story and CBS’ failure to quickly acknowledge the story’s flaws and come clean in a real way. They aired a false story rife with conflicts of interest, they had to be forced to admit there was anything wrong, and the internal investigation of what went wrong wasn’t independent. It’s brutal.

Poynter doesn’t mention it, but while some news organizations like the New York Times and the Washington Post uncovered the problems with the story, Fox News went silent, not mentioning the retraction of a story they’d given blanket coverage when it was first (mis)reported.


Poynter’s runner up points a finger at another piece of Rupert Murdoch’s empire: the New York Post‘s infamous “bag men” cover, which identified two teenagers as suspects in the Boston Marathon bombings—teenagers who were entirely unconnected to the bombings and were not being sought by the FBI.


But while the big missed stories produce teeth-grinding rage, there’s also a world of funny corrections to highlight. For instance, Poynter’s runner-up for apology of the year, from The Sun:


In an article on Saturday headlined ‘Flying saucers over British Scientology HQ’, we stated “two flat silver discs” were seen “above the Church of Scientology HQ”. Following a letter from lawyers for the Church, we apologise to any alien lifeforms for linking them to Scientologists.


Slate had the runner-up correction of the year:

An earlier version of the Carlos Danger Name Generator suggested incorrectly that the Carlos Danger Name for Anthony Weiner is Armando Catastrophe. The Carlos Danger Name for Anthony Weiner is Carlos Danger.

Poynter has many more.



Daily Kos



From horrendous to hilarious: 2013"s media mistakes and corrections

From horrendous to hilarious: 2013"s media mistakes and corrections

New York Post fingers 17 year old kid as bombing suspect

Poynter has rounded up the best and worst media errors and corrections of 2013, and there are some doozies. At the top of the list is a big one: The 60 Minutes Benghazi story and CBS’ failure to quickly acknowledge the story’s flaws and come clean in a real way. They aired a false story rife with conflicts of interest, they had to be forced to admit there was anything wrong, and the internal investigation of what went wrong wasn’t independent. It’s brutal.

Poynter doesn’t mention it, but while some news organizations like the New York Times and the Washington Post uncovered the problems with the story, Fox News went silent, not mentioning the retraction of a story they’d given blanket coverage when it was first (mis)reported.


Poynter’s runner up points a finger at another piece of Rupert Murdoch’s empire: the New York Post‘s infamous “bag men” cover, which identified two teenagers as suspects in the Boston Marathon bombings—teenagers who were entirely unconnected to the bombings and were not being sought by the FBI.


But while the big missed stories produce teeth-grinding rage, there’s also a world of funny corrections to highlight. For instance, Poynter’s runner-up for apology of the year, from The Sun:


In an article on Saturday headlined ‘Flying saucers over British Scientology HQ’, we stated “two flat silver discs” were seen “above the Church of Scientology HQ”. Following a letter from lawyers for the Church, we apologise to any alien lifeforms for linking them to Scientologists.


Slate had the runner-up correction of the year:

An earlier version of the Carlos Danger Name Generator suggested incorrectly that the Carlos Danger Name for Anthony Weiner is Armando Catastrophe. The Carlos Danger Name for Anthony Weiner is Carlos Danger.

Poynter has many more.



Daily Kos



From horrendous to hilarious: 2013"s media mistakes and corrections

Friday, June 28, 2013

VIDEO: Top 10 William Shatner"€™s Captain Kirk Fight Moves







Phasers are for wimps. Join http://www.WatchMojo.com as we count down the top 10 greatest of William Shatner’€™s Captain Kirk fight moves.













Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.







To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.







VIDEO: Top 10 William Shatner"€™s Captain Kirk Fight Moves

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Conspiracy Theory Poll Results Horrifying & Hilarious



Conspiracy theory polling is released by Public Policy Polling, and we look at the results. –On the Bonus Show: Town bans fast food, maybe fast casual, WW…




I do not own the rights to this show. I am simply putting these shows out there as many other YouTubers have already done (it’s how I get them to begin with)…
Video Rating: 5 / 5



Conspiracy Theory Poll Results Horrifying & Hilarious