Showing posts with label efforts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label efforts. Show all posts

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Conservatives" Hilarious, Doomed Efforts to Be Cool

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Conservatives" Hilarious, Doomed Efforts to Be Cool

Conservatives" Hilarious, Doomed Efforts to Be Cool



Nothing is less cool than trying too hard to be cool.








Conservatives have a problem with cool. If they were smart, right-wing pundits and Republican political consultants would just ignore the whole concept of cool. Being conservative is inherently uncool, since the whole point of conservatism is to reject the forward-looking and liberated attitude that has always defined cool. Worrying much about it is just a waste of time. Trying to be cool just makes you look ridiculous, and paradoxically, more uncool. It’s a no-win situation, and yet conservatives continue taking the bait, forever trying to get this whole concept of cool to work for them and always, always failing.


The latest example of the Republicans trying to figure out to work this cool thing and failing is an ad campaign running in 14 states with Senate campaigns in 2014 that shows Scott Greenberg, a 30-year-old Audi driver saying things like he is “ticked off at politicians” for passing regulations, which he believes are the source of unemployment. We are clearly meant to believe that Greenberg is a hipster, demonstrating the infallible conservative ability to hop on any trend right after it’s run out of steam. Greenberg wears a striped shirt and glasses and has a scraggly beard, but sadly for Scott Greenberg and his benefactors, none of that does much to conceal the eau de dweeb that hovers over anyone who takes seriously the idea that wealthy businessmen are the major oppressed class of America.


It’s hard to see why Republicans even bother. Even if it were possible to trick young voters into thinking you can vote Republican and still be cool, it isn’t really necessary. It’s not like the millennial crowd is dweeb-free, for one thing. For another, the usual tactics of using catchphrases like “small government” and “personal responsibility” to cover up race-baiting pandering to white people is working pretty well on white millennials, though perhaps not quite as well as it did on white people before.


No, it’s safe to say that this attempt to be cool is less about really peeling off votes from the Democrats. No, this is about something deeper, a long-standing jealousy and resentment of the left for being a giant vacuum that sucks up all the cool people, leaving behind the right. (Let’s be clear, by no means am I saying all Democrats are cool. They have their fair share of dorks and dweebs. But it is, and many Republicans are keenly aware of this, true that most cool people are pretty liberal. It just comes with the territory.) This creates a major insecurity on the right, and periodically there are embarrassing attempts to deal with it by asserting, laughably, that they have cool people on their side of the aisle, too. It’s painful to watch.


The “nuh-uh, we’re cool, too!” thing has a long and sordid history on the right. Take Andrew Sullivan’s embarrassing attempt to coin the phrase “South Park Republican” in 2001, to describe the younger and cooler form of Republican that was supposedly emerging at the time, and was characterized by being into the show South Park, or at least the worst part of the show, which was its tendency to devolve into half-baked reactionary moralizing from the perspective of writers who clearly didn’t understand the issues. Even the conservative website Daily Caller had to admit recently that “South Park Republicans” had no traction, calling them the “political equivalent of a dodo bird,” which is overgenerous. Roy Edroso more correctly called it more of a fantasy than a reality, pointing out that even at its strongest, South Park Republicanism was straight-laced and more concerned with policing “morality” than letting loose and having fun.


It’s the same urge that, among the Christian right, leads to Christian rock and churches like Mars Hill in Seattle, where the pastor attempts to fool you into thinking he’s cool because he rocks a beard and likes rock music, but you find out at the end of the day, he’s just selling the same old fundamentalism as the more buttoned-up crew.


This is a more secular version of the same urge, and frequently leads to conservatives identifying as “libertarian” without having any meaningful policy differences from the same old Republicans of yore. In the media, it leads to unconvincing attempts to craft hip, bold, young conservative voices—like S.E. Cupp or Greg Gutfeld—that don’t really seem to be fooling anyone except the cranky old conservative audience that can’t really tell the difference. (Gutfeld, at least, has decided to embrace his lack of cool, writing a new book called Not Cool: The Hipster Elite and Their War On You, where he takes another tack of trying to pretend that he wasn’t into that whole “cool” thing anyway.)


But where these attempts to make conservative cool reliably come across as the most pathetic is in the realm of rock music, the great white whale of the right. Conservatives, particularly Baby Boomers, have never really gotten over the fact that they were on the wrong side of the "60s. Witness the insistence on calling CPAC—or the Bakersfield conference or the Tea Party—“Woodstock for conservatives.” Woodstock happened 45 years ago, and clearly the right is still upset that they weren’t a part of it. This, too, explains how, no matter how outrageous or racist or sexually predatory Ted Nugent gets, Republicans can’t let him go or stop using him in fundraising. He’s a rock-and-roller, really the only one they’ve got, so they’re clinging to him like a barnacle on a sinking ship. The only other option is pulling a Chris Christie and following Bruce Springsteen around, trying to make him validate you even though he’s clearly not having it. (Witness the saddest non-serious headline in possibly all of the 21st century: “Chris Christie hopes Bruce Springsteen will be his friend someday.”)


If conservatives were smart, they’d simply ignore cool altogether and go golfing and spend money and simply give up any hope of being cool whatsoever. That strategy of indifference worked for Ronald Reagan. Say what you will about him, he seemed perfectly content to be himself in all his utterly out-of-touch glory, and he was all the more popular for it. The current strategy of being all hung up about it, and desperately casting around for something, anything, that shows that Republicans can be cool, too, only ends up backfiring. After all, nothing is less cool than trying too hard to be cool, and failing.  


 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



Conservatives" Hilarious, Doomed Efforts to Be Cool

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Inside Facebook’s Efforts To Fortify Security In A Post-Snowden World

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Inside Facebook’s Efforts To Fortify Security In A Post-Snowden World

Friday, February 7, 2014

​Food, biotech groups banding together to influence GMO labeling efforts

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



​Food, biotech groups banding together to influence GMO labeling efforts

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

SAP ramps up venture capital efforts


IDG News Service – SAP’s venture capital arm has raised US$ 1 billion over the past year as the company tries to land stakes in hot startup companies,
both to generate profit down the road and to align itself with the industry’s newest technologies.


In total, SAP now has $ 1.4 billion under management in its various venture funds, according to Wednesday’s announcement. As
part of SAP Ventures’ expansion, the organization is also creating a new 10-member business development team, SAP said.


SAP is expecting to have a total of 13 exits for its portfolio companies this year, said Nino Marakovic, CEO of SAP Ventures,
in an interview. Five of the companies, including Marin Software and Violin Memory, have gone public, with another seven acquired
by other vendors. One of the most significant in the latter group is marketing software ExactTarget, which SAP rival Salesforce.com
bought for $ 2.5 billion.


There’s a reason for SAP’s installed base, as opposed to SAP shareholders, to care about what the Ventures group is doing,
Marakovic said.


“We’re kind of a good pipeline into the things that are to come,” he said. “We want to show customers SAP is forward-thinking.”


In addition, SAP’s involvement could give customers more confidence in working with the very smallest startups in the portfolio,
which may have only a handful of initial customers, he said.


SAP has made efforts, including a special venture fund, to get startups interested in its HANA in-memory database platform,
in hopes of quickly developing an ecosystem of partners and applications for HANA.


Overall, SAP looks to invest in mostly enterprise-themed startups, but about 20 percent of its portfolio concerns more consumer-oriented
companies, he said. It is particularly interested in companies that span both markets and reflect the consumerization-of-IT
trend, according to Marakovic.


It’s not unusual for tech companies to have venture capital arms. Intel runs one of the better-known ones, as does IBM.


Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris’ email address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com





Netflash



SAP ramps up venture capital efforts

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Efforts to avert U.S. shutdown continue amid Republican discord


The U.S. Capitol is seen against a clear blue sky in Washington May 20, 2013. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

The U.S. Capitol is seen against a clear blue sky in Washington May 20, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque






WASHINGTON | Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:21am EDT



WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A trio of Tea Party-backed U.S. senators threatening to stall a bill to fund the U.S. government ran into a wall of resistance Monday from top Senate Republicans, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.


In statements issued Monday evening, McConnell and the second-ranking Republican, John Cornyn of Texas, made it clear that they would not support the tactics of freshman Senators Ted Cruz, Mike Lee and Marco Rubio, which would have increased the odds of a government shutdown on Oct 1.


The move, while highlighting growing rifts among Republicans, did not eliminate the possibility of a shutdown, however. Indeed, all signs on Monday still pointed to a frantic last-minute showdown that will determine whether or not the U.S. government stays open next week as a result of Republican efforts to scuttle “Obamacare,” President Barack Obama’s health care law.


Heightening the tension, and the pressure on Republicans, the Pentagon issued a warning about the consequences of a shutdown, neither the first nor the last such announcement expected from federal agencies over the next few days.


Congressional authorization for the government to spend money runs out at the end of the fiscal year on September 30, unless Congress passes a “continuing resolution” (CR) to keep the government running.


On Friday, Republicans in the House of Representatives passed and sent to the Senate a measure that would make continued funding of the government contingent on defunding Obamacare, which is designed to provide insurance coverage to millions of uninsured Americans.


The bill passed on a mostly partisan vote of 230-189.


The Democratic-controlled Senate is likely to strip out the Obamacare provision and send the funding bill back to the House, but it’s taking its time.


It could be as late as Sunday evening before it acts, giving the House less than 24 hours to sort out its many divisions and respond.


“Either pass a clean CR or shut down the federal government,” would be the Senate’s message to the House, Majority Leader Harry Reid said on Monday.


Any bill that defunds Obamacare “is dead on arrival in the Senate … We’re not going to bow to Tea Party anarchists,” Reid said, referring to the most ardent Obamacare opponents, who are increasingly influential in the Republican House.


A threat to use the tactic of a filibuster by Cruz, Rubio and Lee – while unlikely to have permanently thwarted Reid and his Democrats – would have at least slowed things down even more, particularly if backed by other Republicans.


It takes 60 votes in the hundred-member Senate to end a filibuster. With Democrats controlling only 54 votes, they will need at least six Republicans to move the measure back to the House.


Statements by McConnell and Cornyn strongly suggested that those Republican votes would indeed be available. Cruz and Rubio are both potential presidential contenders in 2016. Cruz in particular has angered fellow Republicans by going out on his own around the country to pressure them into not “surrendering” on Obamacare.


Ironically, a successful filibuster by Tea Party supporters would have blocked consideration of the bill to defund Obamacare, supported by the smaller-government Tea Party and passed with a round of cheers by House conservatives.


The Defense Department said on Monday it had been directed by the White House budget office to begin planning for a shutdown, an action it said would “put severe hardships on an already stressed workforce and is totally unnecessary.”


All military personnel would continue working regardless of the shutdown, Pentagon spokesman George Little said, but they might not be paid on time, depending on how long it lasted.


The government does not totally close down in such situations. There are many exceptions, including national security, emergency services, payments of Medicare health insurance and Social Security retirement benefits.


PUBLIC OUTCRY


If Congress fails to meet its deadline, a shutdown could last a few hours or a few days but probably not longer, as it would inevitably be accompanied by a public outcry that has often in the past forced Congress’s hand.


A CNBC poll released on Monday showed that by a 59-19 percent margin respondents opposed linking defunding of Obamacare to a possible shutdown, or to a failure to raise the government’s borrowing authority, which is also expected to provoke a showdown by mid-October or early November.


Eighteen percent were undecided, according to the nationwide poll of 800 people conducted by Hart-McInturff. It had a margin of error of 3.4 percentage points.


The House includes 200 Democrats and 233 Republicans. A combined vote of roughly two dozen Republicans and almost all Democrats is thought to be the most likely route to avoiding a shutdown or to undoing one once it gets started.


The long Republican war against Obamacare is at the heart of the clashes ahead, just as important provisions of that law start taking effect on October 1.


The only certainty is that when the dust settles, Obamacare will still be standing. The law was upheld by the Supreme Court last year.


House Republicans next week hope to unveil a second important bill – one to prevent the U.S. government from defaulting on its debt sometime in October or November.


The legislation would raise the country’s $ 16.7 trillion borrowing limit. Republicans again want to extract something from Democrats in return for the debt limit hike.


They have been talking about attaching yet another plan to the debt limit bill that would gut or delay portions of Obamacare, as well as forcing approval of the Keystone oil pipeline that would run from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.


House Republicans say they also are looking at some tax provisions to possibly add onto the debt limit bill.


Obama has warned Republicans against loading up the debt limit bill with unrelated items, saying he will not negotiate on a measure that in effect pays the government’s outstanding bills.


Passage of a loaded-up debt limit bill in the House likely would trigger a rerun of the stop-gap spending fight that is consuming Washington now.


The battle over the shutdown and the debt ceiling is to some extent a repeat of fiscal showdowns that have taken up much of the past three years, since Republicans took control of the House in the 2010 elections.


With every one of them, the standing of Congress among Americans, never very high, has sunk even lower.


(Reporting By Richard Cowan and David Alexander; Editing by Fred Barbash, Xavier Briand, Jim Loney and Tim Dobbyn)


(This Sept. 23 story was refiled to correct the spelling of Cruz throughout)






Reuters: Politics



Efforts to avert U.S. shutdown continue amid Republican discord

Sunday, July 28, 2013

States seek to nullify Obama efforts


Barack Obama is shown. | AP Photo

Nullification supporters say it’s the best tool they have to beat back the federal government. | AP Photo





Infuriated by what they see as the long arm of Washington reaching into their business, states are increasingly telling the feds: Keep out!


Bills that would negate a variety of federal laws have popped up this year in the vast majority of states – with the amount of anti-federal legislation sharply on the rise during the Obama administration, according to experts.







The “nullification” trend in recent years – which has touched off both fierce battles within the states, and between the states and the feds, as well as raising questions and court battles about whether any of it is legal – has largely focused on three areas: gun control; health care; and national standards for driver’s licenses.


(PHOTOS: Obama’s second term)


In at least 37 states legislation has been introduced that in some way guts federal gun regulations, according to the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. The bills were signed into law this spring in two states, Kansas and Alaska, and in two more lawmakers hope to override a governor’s veto. Twenty states since 2010 have passed laws that either opt out of or challenge mandatory parts of Obamacare, the National Conference of State Legislatures says. And half the states have OK’d measures aimed knocking back the Real ID Act of 2005, which dictates Washington’s requirements for issuing driver’s licenses.


“Rosa Parks is the beacon of light: If you say no to something, you can change the world,” Michael Boldin, the Founder of the Tenth Amendment Center, which favors states’ rights, told POLITICO.


“Isn’t that what it’s supposed to be, ‘We, the people?’” he added. “Over the past few years you’ve seen this growing…People are getting sick and tired of federal power.”


(PHOTOS: Obama’s first term in cartoons)


In fact, the state-level anger at the nation’s capital has reached such a fever pitch that many of the bills do not even address specific federal laws, but rather amount to what is in effect “preemptive” nullification, wiping out, for instance, any federal law that may exist in the future that the states determine violates gun rights. The flurry of such effors was spurred by fear on the part of states that in the wake of the tragic shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn., that Congress would pass restrictive gun control legislation.


Supporters of nullification say it’s the best tool they have to try to beat back an intrusive federal government that they say is more and more trampling on the rights of states.


But critics respond that the flood of legislation to override the feds is folly that won’t stand up in court and amounts to a transparent display of the political and personal distaste for President Barack Obama. And in some cases, the moves in the states has provoked an administration counter-offensive: Attorney General Eric Holder sent a letter to Kansas after it passed the “Second Amendment Protection Act” threatening legal action if necessary to enforce federal laws.


(PHOTOS: What’s in Obama’s 2014 budget)


Even some conservatives – certainly no lovers of the Obama administration – warn that the states are going down the wrong path with nullification, distracted by a what lawmakers think is a silver-bullet solution, but that likely won’t stand up in the courts, when in fact there are much better (and legal) ways for the states to resist.


While most states have wrapped their legislative sessions for the year, the fight on these bills is taking only a brief pause. In Missouri, for example, lawmakers are preparing for a veto session in September, where supporters of a gun measure would eviscerate any future congressional attempts to regulate gun ownership are planning to attempt to override the governor’s veto. The nullification battle has also spilled over into the courts, with more challenges and rulings expected during the year.


In Kansas, state Rep. John Rubin sponsored successful legislation that dictates that federal gun laws do not apply to firearms and accessories made in Kansas and that never leave its borders, and makes it a felony for any federal agent to enforce those laws within the state.


The Republican lawmaker told POLITICO his bill is about states’ rights – not gun rights.


“The federal government doesn’t have the authority to do a lot of what it’s trying to do these days, from regulating guns within state borders, as my bill deals with, or telling us what kinds of light bulbs to put in our lamps,” Rubin said.


He noted a rise in the number nullification bills.


“I think we have the Obama administration to thank for that.” Rubin said. “The more federal overreach in Obamacare and elsewhere, the more [the administration] chooses to act in ways we believe are unconstitutional, the more we’re going to push back. I would encourage any state to assert to the strongest possible extent against the Obama administration, or any federal administration, rights clearly reserved to the states.”




POLITICO – TOP Stories



States seek to nullify Obama efforts

Monday, May 27, 2013

Japan must continue efforts to deactivate Fukushima nuclear plant – UN agency


UN.org
May 27, 2013


Although Japan has made progress towards stabilizing the damaged reactors of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant crippled by a devastating earthquake two years ago, there are still issues to be resolved before it can begin its deactivation, the United Nations atomic agency said in a report released today.


The report was released after an expert team from the UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) completed an initial review of Japan’s efforts to implement a Mid-and-Long-Term Roadmap to decommission the Fukushima Daiichi power plant. The visit was the first of what is planned to be a two-mission review, at the request of the Japanese Government.


“Our final report reflects that the Roadmap was developed early after the accident and that Japanese workers have achieved reasonable stable cooling of the damaged reactor cores and spent fuel pools,” said the Director of the IAEA’s Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology, Juan Carlos Lentijo.


Read full article


This article was posted: Monday, May 27, 2013 at 12:46 pm


Tags: radiation









Infowars



Japan must continue efforts to deactivate Fukushima nuclear plant – UN agency