Showing posts with label Hospitals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hospitals. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Dirty Hospitals, Deadly Consequences

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Dirty Hospitals, Deadly Consequences

More Hospitals Closing Due to Obamacare

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



More Hospitals Closing Due to Obamacare

Friday, January 17, 2014

Filthy endoscopes linked to superbug outbreaks at hospitals

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Filthy endoscopes linked to superbug outbreaks at hospitals

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

America"s top hospitals to be excluded from Obamacare











DeliciousPin It

(NaturalNews) One of the reasons why U.S. healthcare is expensive is because some of the world’s best hospitals are based in our country. That’s not the only reason why, mind you, but let’s face it: things of higher quality tend to cost more.

But there will be none of that “best quality care” available for most ordinary Americans, thanks to Obamacare: New published information says that those who sign up under the healthcare law’s exchanges will be excluded from coverage that would pay for care at many of the nation’s top hospitals.


And you thought Barack Obama cared about “the little people.”


As reported by Britain’s Financial Times:


Americans who are buying insurance plans over online exchanges, under what is known as Obamacare, will have limited access to some of the nation’s leading hospitals, including two world-renowned cancer centers.


Amid a drive by insurers to limit costs, the majority of insurance plans being sold on the new healthcare exchanges in New York, Texas, and California, for example, will not offer patients’ access to Memorial Sloan Kettering in Manhattan or MD Anderson Cancer CenHter in ouston, two top cancer centers, or Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles, one of the top research and teaching hospitals in the country.


This move by government is entirely financial in nature, as experts have noted. They say any move to limit consumers’ choices and guide them away from hospitals that are considered expensive is what the new “competition” within the insurance industry since the passage of Obamacare will look like.


Thanks to the imposition of new government mandates and standards, health insurance plans necessarily must be more expensive in order to meet the law’s requirements. So, with his signature on the Affordable Care Act, Obama now gets to decide what kind of coverage you have and where you have to go to get care.


What’s worse is that the media is covering this from the angle of how this new revelation will affect the Dear Leader and his party:


It could become another source of political controversy for the Obama administration next year, when the plans take effect. Frustrated consumers could then begin to realize what is not always evident when buying a product as complicated as healthcare insurance: that their new plans do not cover many facilities or doctors “in network”. In other words, the facilities and doctors are not among the list of approved providers in a certain plan.


Yes, it’s all grand political theater, isn’t it? Never mind that the real issue isn’t how the law affects Obama – who can’t even stand for reelection – or Democrats who, thanks to the president, are going to have their insurance rates subsidized 75 percent by We the People, it’s how the law is affecting real folks.


And it’s only going to get worse. Much worse.


More from Financial Times:


Under some US health insurance plans, consumers can elect to visit medical facilities that are “out of network”, but they would probably incur high out of pocket costs and may need referrals to prove that such care is medically necessary.


The development is worrying some hospital administrators who see the change as an unintended consequence of the ACA.


“We’re very concerned. [Insurers] know patients that are sick come to places like ours. What this is trying to do is redirect those patients elsewhere, but there is a reason why they come here. These patients need what it is that we are capable of providing,” Thomas Priselac, president and chief executive officer of Cedars-Sinai Health System in California, told FT.


So much for saving money and widening access


Do you remember what one of Obama’s many promises was in regard to the Affordable Care Act? The law was supposed to make health insurance cheaper – like, to the tune of $ 2,500 a year. Now, however, not only is coverage going to be more expensive, but anyone in an Obamacare exchange won’t even have access to the country’s best facilities:


Amid these new regulatory restrictions, says Tim Jost, a health policy expert, insurance companies have had to come up with new ways to cut the cost of their products. In this new era, limiting the availability of certain facilities that are seen as too expensive – in part because they may attract the sickest patients or offer the most cutting edge medical care – is seen as the best way to control costs.


“It’s like buying a Mercedes-Benz or a Chevy. You have to decide whether you want to pay for the highest product out there, which is probably pretty good quality, or the less expensive product,” Jost said. “Everyone is in favor of competition until they see what it looks like. Then they think, maybe it’s better for someone else just to pay for the whole thing.”


Guess who gets the Mercedes and who has to settle for the Chevy? And so much for that promised increased access to quality healthcare.


This is the government deciding what kind and quality of healthcare we, the little people, can have. Because you know that the president and those in Congress who voted for this outrage are going to get the best care our tax money can buy.


Sources:


http://www.ft.com


http://www.breitbart.com


http://www.youtube.com


http://obamacarefacts.com





Articles Related to This Article:


Another Obamacare surprise: Major hospitals all across the country not included under new insurance plans

Hospitals Are a Major Health Hazard


Many US hospitals, including children’s hospitals, continue to serve McDonald’s fast food in their cafeterias


Physicians are being swallowed up by hospitals – Healthcare costs on the rise


Covert surveillance program in NY hospitals uses hand-washing compliance excuse to spy on workers


U.S. hospitals fail basic hygiene standards; infections worsen



Related video from NaturalNews.TV



Your NaturalNews.TV video could be here.
Upload your own videos at NaturalNews.TV (FREE)


Have comments on this article? Post them here:



comments powered by




Related Articles:


Another Obamacare surprise: Major hospitals all across the country not included under new insurance plans

Hospitals Are a Major Health Hazard


Many US hospitals, including children’s hospitals, continue to serve McDonald’s fast food in their cafeterias


Physicians are being swallowed up by hospitals – Healthcare costs on the rise


Covert surveillance program in NY hospitals uses hand-washing compliance excuse to spy on workers


U.S. hospitals fail basic hygiene standards; infections worsen



Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com


Email this article to a friend

Permalink to this article:

Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.


Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):




NaturalNews.com



America"s top hospitals to be excluded from Obamacare

Saturday, November 9, 2013

Financial woes hit UK hospitals hard

Financial woes hit UK hospitals hard
http://isbigbrotherwatchingyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/f67bc__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif


A British parliamentary committee has been warned that a third of hospitals across the UK are going into the red amid a crippling financial crisis created by unprecedented cash squeeze, media reports say.


The warning by the Nuffield Trust health think tank cautioned members of parliament (MPs) in a bleak assessment of the National Health Service (NHS)’s financial difficulties, saying one in three hospitals could end up unsustainable with the current system not equipped enough to face the growing problem, British media reported.


The House of Commons health select committee launched the probe into the NHS’s ongoing £20bn savings drive, and it was warned by the think tank that ministers should be prepared to face any possible scenario.


“Many hospitals face severe and potentially unsustainable financial pressures”, the trust told the MPs, adding that its analysis of official data about the NHS’s financial health puts a question mark over its future viability.


According to the trust’s assessment, smaller hospitals which are operating semi-autonomously of NHS and the government’s control face a greater risk because they are not given foundation trust status.


The trust added that those hospitals in “regional clusters of financial stress”, such as outer London and the West Midlands, are also going into the red.


The foundation trust status would not be given to 83 NHS trusts from among 246 trusts which are providing care in England because they are not earning enough, or generating a sufficient surplus from their work, said the Nuffield Trust.


According to Monitor, the NHS’s economic regulator, those trusts include 40 of the 146 foundation trusts and 43 of the 100 trusts which have not achieved that status.


Meanwhile, the NHS would not be able to bail out hospitals in trouble because “hospital trusts could start becoming unsustainable in larger number than the current system is designed to address”, according to the trust.


The main opposition Labour Party used the think tank’s analysis to blame the coalition government for failing to address hospitals’ financial woes.


“Ministers lack a plan to deal with trusts in serious financial difficulties and cannot guarantee that the quality of patient care will not be affected. With hospital trusts facing a financial challenge, the government should be focusing on sorting the situation out,” said Andy Burnham, the shadow health secretary.


Anita Charlesworth, the trust’s chief economist, said: “We need to monitor the signs that this challenging situation could lead to an unsustainable financial squeeze on hospital trusts. The weakest hospitals appear to be getting weaker.”


MOL/NN/AS




PRESS TV RSS News




Read more about Financial woes hit UK hospitals hard and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Chemical release at Intel in Arizona sends 11 to hospitals


(CNN) — A chemical release at the Intel complex in Chandler, Arizona, on Saturday sent 11 people to local hospitals, where they were reported in stable condition, said fire department spokesman Tom Dwiggins.


Forty-three people suffered breathing difficulties and skin and eye irritations, but only 11 of them were taken to medical centers, he said.


The leak began at 6:30 a.m. Saturday but has since been stopped, Dwiggins said later Saturday morning.


The cause is under investigation, he said.


CNN’s John Branch contributed to this report.




CNN.com Recently Published/Updated



Chemical release at Intel in Arizona sends 11 to hospitals

Friday, May 17, 2013

Conn. commuter trains collide; 60 go to hospitals







Emergency workers arrive the scene of a train collision, Friday, may 17, 2013 in Fairfield, Conn. A New York-area commuter railroad says two trains have collided in Connecticut. The railroad says the accident involved a New York-bound train leaving New Haven. It derailed and hit a westbound train near Fairfield, Conn. Some cars on the second train also derailed. (AP Photo/The Connecticut Post, Christian Abraham) MANDATORY CREDIT





Emergency workers arrive the scene of a train collision, Friday, may 17, 2013 in Fairfield, Conn. A New York-area commuter railroad says two trains have collided in Connecticut. The railroad says the accident involved a New York-bound train leaving New Haven. It derailed and hit a westbound train near Fairfield, Conn. Some cars on the second train also derailed. (AP Photo/The Connecticut Post, Christian Abraham) MANDATORY CREDIT





Injured passengers are transported from the scene where two Metro North commuter trains collided, Friday, May 17, 2013 near Fairfield, Conn. Bill Kaempffer, a spokesman for Bridgeport public safety, told The Associated Press approximately 49 people were injured, including four with serious injuries. About 250 people were on board the two trains, he said. (AP Photo/The Connecticut Post, Christian Abraham) MANDATORY CREDIT: CONNECTICUT POST, CHRISTIAN ABRAHAM





Passengers leave the area where two Metro North commuter trains collided, Friday, May 17, 2013 near Fairfield, Conn. Bill Kaempffer, a spokesman for Bridgeport public safety, told The Associated Press approximately 49 people were injured, including four with serious injuries. About 250 people were on board the two trains, he said. (AP Photo/The Connecticut Post, Christian Abraham) MANDATORY CREDIT: CONNECTICUT POST, CHRISTIAN ABRAHAM





Injured passengers are transported from the scene where two Metro North commuter trains collided, Friday, May 17, 2013 near Fairfield, Conn. Bill Kaempffer, a spokesman for Bridgeport public safety, told The Associated Press approximately 49 people were injured, including four with serious injuries. About 250 people were on board the two trains, he said. (AP Photo/The Connecticut Post, Christian Abraham) MANDATORY CREDIT: CONNECTICUT POST, CHRISTIAN ABRAHAM





Emergency personnel work at the scene where two Metro North commuter trains collided, Friday, May 17, 2013 near Fairfield, Conn. Bill Kaempffer, a spokesman for Bridgeport public safety, told The Associated Press approximately 49 people were injured, including four with serious injuries. About 250 people were on board the two trains, he said. (AP Photo/The Connecticut Post, Christian Abraham) MANDATORY CREDIT: CONNECTICUT POST, CHRISTIAN ABRAHAM













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — Two commuter trains serving New York City collided in Connecticut during Friday’s evening rush hour, sending 60 people to the hospital, including five with critical injuries, Gov. Dannel Malloy said.


About 250 people were on board the Metro-North trains when one heading east from New York City’s Grand Central Station to New Haven derailed about 6:10 p.m. just outside Bridgeport, MTA and Bridgeport officials said.


The train was hit by a train heading west from New Haven to Grand Central on an adjacent track, MTA spokesman Aaron Donovan said. Some cars on the second train also derailed as a result of the collision.


Lola Oliver, 49, of Bridgeport, was on one of the trains when she suddenly found herself in mid-air.


“Finally I came to a stop on one of the seats. And I just gripped it because I felt the train sliding. It happened so fast I had no idea what was going on. All I know is we crashed,” she told The Associated Press in a hospital interview.


Investigators Friday night did not know what caused the first train to derail. Malloy said there was no reason to believe it was anything other than an accident.


“We’re most concerned about the injured and ultimately reopening the system,” Malloy said from the scene about three hours after the crash.


The governor said that most people were not seriously hurt. Among those critically injured, he said, one’s injuries were “very critical.”


The Metro-North Railroad, a commuter line serving the northern suburbs, described it as a “major derailment.” Photos showed a train car askew on the rails, with its end smashed up and brushing against another train. Amtrak suspended service indefinitely between New York and Boston.


Malloy said there was extensive damage to the train cars and the track, and it could take until Monday for normal service to be restored. He said the accident will have a “big impact on the Northeast Corridor.”


The area where the accident happened was already down to two tracks because of repair work, Malloy said. Crews have been working for a long time on the electric lines above the tracks, the power source for the trains. He said Connecticut has an old system and no other alternate tracks.


By late evening, Bridgeport Police Chief Joseph Gaudett said everybody who needed treatment had been attended to, and authorities were beginning to turn their attention to investigating the cause.


“Everybody seemed pretty calm,” he said. “Everybody was thankful they didn’t get seriously hurt. They were anxious to get home to their families.”


The Metropolitan Transportation Authority operates the Metro-North Railroad, the second-largest commuter railroad in the nation. The Metro-North main lines — the Hudson, Harlem, and New Haven — run northward from New York City’s Grand Central Terminal into suburban New York and Connecticut.


Associated Press




U.S. Headlines



Conn. commuter trains collide; 60 go to hospitals