Showing posts with label JPMorgan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JPMorgan. Show all posts

Sunday, February 9, 2014

Suspicious Death of JPMorgan Vice President, Gabriel Magee, Under Investigation in London

Suspicious Death of JPMorgan Vice President, Gabriel Magee, Under Investigation in London
http://wallstreetonparade.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/JPMorgans-European-Headquarters-at-25-Bank-Street-in-the-Canary-Wharf-Section-of-London.jpg




(Left) JPMorgan’s European Headquarters at 25 Bank Street, in the Canary Wharf Section of London



London Police have confirmed that an official investigation is underway into the death of a 39-year old JPMorgan Vice President whose body was found on the 9th floor rooftop of a JPMorgan building in Canary Wharf two weeks ago.


The news reports at the time of the incident of Gabriel (Gabe) Magee’s “non suspicious” death by “suicide” resulting from his reported leap from the 33rd level rooftop of JPMorgan’s European headquarters building in London have turned out to be every bit as reliable as CEO Jamie Dimon’s initial response to press reports on the London Whale trading scandal in 2012 as a “tempest in a teapot.”


An intense investigation is now underway into the details of exactly how Magee died and why his death was so quickly labeled “non suspicious.” An upcoming Coroner’s inquest will reveal the details of that investigation.


It’s becoming clear that when JPMorgan tells us “nothing to see here, move along,” that’s the precise time we need to bring in the blood hounds and law enforcement with the guts to get past this global behemoth’s army of lawyers who have a penchant for taking over investigations and producing their own milquetoast reports of what happened.


Jamie Dimon’s so-called “tempest in a teapot” in the London Whale matter morphed into $ 6.2 billion in bank depositor losses, $ 1 billion in fines to JPMorgan, 300 pages of scandalous details by the U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations that called into question JPMorgan’s risk controls and the integrity of upper management, and, finally, resulted in criminal charges against two of the men involved. The criminal cases have yet to go to trial.


According to numerous sources close to the investigation of Gabriel Magee’s death, almost nothing thus far reported about his death has been accurate. This appears to stem from an initial poorly worded press release issued by the Metropolitan Police in London which may have been a result of bad communications between it and JPMorgan or something more deliberate on someone’s part.


The Metropolitan Police have provided me with their original press release. It reads:


“Police were called at approximately 08.02 hrs on Tuesday 28 January to reports of a man having fallen from a building at 25 Bank Street, E14 and landing on a ninth floor roof. London Ambulance Service and London Air Ambulance attended. The man was pronounced dead at the scene a short while later. The deceased is believed to be aged 39. We believe we know the identity of the deceased but await formal identification. Next of kin have been informed. No arrests have been made and the death is being treated as non-suspicious.”


That press release resulted in CNBC running with this headline: “Death Plunge at JP Morgan Tower Not Suspicious, Police Say.” Dozens of other media followed with similar reporting.


The Independent newspaper in London flatly stated that Magee “died after falling from the roof.” The London Evening Standard tweeted: “Bankers watch JP Morgan IT exec fall to his death from roof of London HQ,” which linked to their article which declared in its opening sentence that “A man plunged to his death from a Canary Wharf tower in front of thousands of horrified commuters today.”


At this moment in time, police have yet to produce a single witness who saw Magee jump from the rooftop of this building, let alone “thousands of horrified commuters.” (Exactly why would thousands of horrified commuters be standing in front of 25 Bank Street at 8:02 a.m. with their necks tilted up toward the roof? Magee did not land on the sidewalk; his body was found on a rooftop 9 floors above street level.) Both the Independent and London Evening Standard newspapers are majority owned by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian and former KGB agent.


No one in the media seemed to notice that Iain Dey, Deputy Business Editor of the Sunday Times in London, flatly disputed the notion that a plunge from the rooftop had been observed by anyone when he reported that: “Gabriel Magee’s body lay for several hours before it was found at 8am last Tuesday.”


The only facts in this case which are currently reliable are that fellow workers looking from their windows in the building noticed a body lying on the 9th level rooftop, which juts out from the main 33-story building, at around 8:02 a.m. on Tuesday, January 28, and called the police. There is no concrete proof at this moment in time that Magee fell, jumped or was ever on the 33-story rooftop, which is a highly secured area of the building unobtainable by employees other than top security and maintenance personnel. According to design documents that have been publicly filed, the rooftop functions as a highly sophisticated cooling plant with large, bulky machinery taking up the majority of the space on the side of the building from which Magee would have had to jump in order to land on the 9th level rooftop.


No solid evidence exists currently to suggest that the death was a suicide. In fact, there is a strong piece of evidence pointing in the opposite direction. Magee had emailed his girlfriend, Veronica, on the evening of January 27 to say that he was about to leave the office and would see her shortly. She received no further emails from him, suggesting that whatever happened to Magee happened shortly thereafter, not the next morning. According to multiple sources, Magee’s girlfriend reported his disappearance on the evening of January 27. The Metropolitan Police would provide me with no details on that investigation.


The JPMorgan building at 25 Bank Street is located in the borough of Tower Hamlets. According to drawings and plans submitted by JPMorgan to the borough after it purchased the building for £495 million in 2010, the 9th floor roof is accessible “via the stair from level 8 within the existing Level 9 plant enclosure…”  In other words, it would be just as reasonable to entertain the possibility that Magee suffered his physical injuries inside the building and his body was placed on the 9th level rooftop via an internal staircase access sometime during the night of January 27.


The LinkedIn profile that Magee set up for himself online indicates that he was involved with “Technical architecture oversight for planning, development, and operation of systems for fixed income securities and interest rate derivatives.” As a key part of the computer technology group in London, Magee may have been involved in providing subpoenaed material for the London Whale investigation and the myriad other investigations that JPMorgan has been sanctioned and fined for over the last year. There are two serious open investigations into foreign exchange rigging and potential manipulation of commodities markets.


The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) lists the man known as the London Whale, Bruno Iksil, who is cooperating with criminal prosecutors, and the two traders who have been criminally charged with hiding hundreds of millions of dollars in losses, Javier Martin-Artajo and Julien Grout, as having the same JPMorgan address, 25 Bank Street, as did Gabriel Magee.


Documents produced by the U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, however, show a 2012 address for JPMorgan’s Chief Investment Office in London, supposedly where the London Whale trades were originating, as 100 Wood Street, 6th Floor, London. If the London Whale traders were located at an address other than the European Headquarters for JPMorgan, it could have been to evade detection by regulators that the firm was using bank deposits in the United States, that carried FDIC insurance, to place high risk gambles in London in the derivatives market.


The Senate’s 300-page report noted that key traders involved in the London Whale matter, including Iksil, Martin-Artajo, and Grout, refused to submit to interviews by the Senate investigators. The Senate report notes that “their refusal to provide information to the Subcommittee meant that this Report had to be prepared without their direct input.  The Subcommittee relied instead on their internal emails, recorded telephone conversations and instant messages, internal memoranda and presentations, and interview summaries prepared by the bank’s internal investigation, to reconstruct what happened.”


If Magee became aware that incriminating emails, instant messages, or video teleconferences were not turned over in their entirety to Senate investigators or Justice Department prosecutors, that might be reason enough for his untimely death. Yes, this is speculation. But it is along the lines that smart thinking investigators need to intensely explore to bring peace of mind and answers to Gabriel Magee’s loved ones and coworkers.


Related Article:


A Rash of Deaths and a Missing Reporter — With Ties to Wall Street Investigations




WHAT REALLY HAPPENED




Read more about Suspicious Death of JPMorgan Vice President, Gabriel Magee, Under Investigation in London and other interesting subjects concerning The Edge at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Exclusive: JPMorgan plans to keep pay roughly flat from last year - sources

Exclusive: JPMorgan plans to keep pay roughly flat from last year - sources
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/0f6de__?m=02&d=20131121&t=2&i=813908718&w=460&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=CBRE9AK1DOR00.jpg





Thu Nov 21, 2013 1:01pm EST






Read more about Exclusive: JPMorgan plans to keep pay roughly flat from last year - sources and other interesting subjects concerning Business at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Sunday, October 20, 2013

JPMorgan ‘agrees’ to tentative $13 billion penalty for role in 2008 financial crisis


AFP Photo / Robyn Beck
AFP Photo / Robyn Beck


In a telephone call on Friday between the US attorney general and the bank’s CEO, the two sides tentatively agreed to a $ 13billion settlement for JPMorgan’s alleged sales of fraudulent mortgage-backed securities.


The tentative agreement concludes a civil investigation by the California attorney general over the bank’s sale of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from 2005 to 2007, as well as the New York attorney general’s probe of Bear Stearns’ sale of MBSs to these two companies. JPMorgan, the largest US bank by assets, still faces a criminal investigation by the state of California.


The $ 13 billion penalty is a drop in the bucket compared to the massive amount forked over by the US government to keep the global economy from total collapse. Forbes reported in 2011 that the estimated $ 16 trillion emergency lifeline tossed to banks and corporations during the worst of the crisis was actually an underestimate of the true cost to US taxpayers.


The record civil settlement includes investigations of the mortgage businesses of Washington Mutual and Bear Stearns, which were both acquired by JPMorgan just as the crisis was making landfall for a mere fraction of their total worth.


President Barack Obama, who pledged on two dusty campaign trails to hold companies legally responsible for unethical conduct leading up to the financial crisis, has come under fire in the past for not doing enough to punish those responsible for the crisis.


“[W]hen faced with the greatest economic crisis, the greatest levels of economic inequality, and the greatest levels of corporate influence on politics since the Depression, Barack Obama stared into the eyes of history and chose to avert his gaze,” wrote Drew Westen in the New York Times in August 2011. “Instead of indicting the people whose recklessness wrecked the economy, he put them in charge of it.”


Back in May, the US Department of Justice put JPMorgan Chase & Co on notice that it was under investigation for violating federal securities law by selling highly volatile subprime and Alt-A residential mortgage securities from 2005 to 2007, just before the housing bubble burst.


The $ 13 billion penalty, $ 9 billion in fines to the government and $ 4 billion in mortgage relief programs to homeowners, some of whom lost their homes in the crisis.


The agreement between the Justice Department and the financial powerhouse does not include a non-prosecution agreement that JPMorgan had originally insisted be part of the deal.


The company, one of the few financial brokerages that emerged largely unscathed from the 2008 crisis, has agreed to cooperate with investigations against bank employees who may have knowingly committed fraud, CBS News, citing an anonymous inside source, reported.


In its latest quarterly earnings, JPMorgan booked a $ 9.2 billion litigation charge related to the probes. JPMorgan also disclosed a huge $ 23 billion in litigation reserves. It made about $ 20 billion net profit in all of 2012.  JPMorgan Chase has spent $ 22 billion since 2008 on an estimated 18 federal, state and overseas probes.


The settlement is the latest in a string of legal woes for JPMorgan.


In September, the company agreed to pay about $ 920 million in fines to US and UK regulators over charges related to the so-called “London Whale” incident that saw a team of traders last year bet heavily on complex derivatives that ultimately resulted in some $ 6 billion in losses.


JPMorgan reported a third-quarter loss in the wake of mounting legal expenses.


CEO Jamie Dimon said in a press release accompanying the earnings statement that earnings could be choppy in the near future.


“While we expect our litigation costs should abate and normalize over time, they may continue to be volatile over the next several quarters,” he said.


JPMorgan posted a loss of 17 cents per share in the latest quarter, compared with net income of $ 1.40 per share one year earlier.


Source: RT





End the Lie – Independent News



JPMorgan ‘agrees’ to tentative $13 billion penalty for role in 2008 financial crisis

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Regulators to fine JPMorgan $80 million over consumer dealings: NYT


Wednesday, July 31, 2013

JPMorgan reaches $410mn settlement


JPMorgan Chase has reached a $ 410 million settlement with the top US energy regulator, which had accused the giant bank of devising “manipulative schemes” to transform “money-losing power plants into powerful profit centers.”


The deal with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Tuesday was a record fine. The most recent settlement the FERC had with a big bank totaled only $ 1.6 million.


JPMorgan is also preparing to give another penalty for mortgage securities it sold to the government. But people familiar with the matter said, a housing regulator has recently rejected an offer the bank made to settle the claims, according to the New York Times.


JPMorgan sold billions of dollars in mortgages it sold to government-controlled Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This could be the most costly case for the bank.


JPMorgan and 17 other banks are accused by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie and Freddie, of selling mortgage securities that later imploded.


The bank is swiftly losing credibility in Washington as eight federal agencies are investigating it. Some regulators have accused JPMorgan of resisting security of the $ 6 billion trading loss in London last year.


In a meeting in April, officials from US central bank and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency warned Jamie Dimon, the bank’s chief executive, that they were losing patience with JPMorgan, the Times said.


Though Dimon has voed to “do all the work necessary to complete the needed improvements” in his relations with regulators, some regulators said they were hesitant to believe that JPMorgan was truly reforming its ways, with one official describing the government’s reaction as “trust but verify.”


ARA/ARA




PRESS TV RSS News



JPMorgan reaches $410mn settlement