Showing posts with label Laden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Laden. Show all posts

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Prosecutors rest case in conspiracy trial of bin Laden son-in-law

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Prosecutors rest case in conspiracy trial of bin Laden son-in-law

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Sulaiman Abu Ghaith helped Bin Laden publicize Sept. 11, 2001, attacks immediately: prosecutor


Daniel Beekman
nydailynews.com
March 5, 2014


While the Twin Towers still burned, on the afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001, Osama Bin Laden turned for help to someone he knew he could trust, a prosecutor said Wednesday just blocks from Ground Zero.


The Al Qaeda boss turned to son-in-law Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, the prosecutor said.


“He needed the world to know that his organization was responsible,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicholas Lewin thundered in an opening statement for Abu Ghaith’s terrorism trial in Manhattan Federal Court.

Read more


This article was posted: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 at 1:35 pm









Infowars



Sulaiman Abu Ghaith helped Bin Laden publicize Sept. 11, 2001, attacks immediately: prosecutor

Sunday, March 2, 2014

Right Sector Calls On Russia’s Bin Laden to Fight in Ukraine


Chechen Islamist has claimed responsibility for attacks on Russian civilians


Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 2, 2014


Doku Umarov, leader of the Islamic Caucasus Emirate, an al-Qaeda affiliate in the Caucasus. Image taken from a videotape in which Umarov took credit for the 2010 suicide attacks on the Moscow Metro.

Doku Umarov, leader of the Islamic Caucasus Emirate, an al-Qaeda affiliate in the Caucasus. Image taken from a videotape in which Umarov took credit for the 2010 suicide attacks on the Moscow Metro.



Right Sector, the ultra-nationalist street fighting group that targeted police prior to the coup in Ukraine, has called for Doku Umarov to fight in a war against Russia.


Umarov, known as the “Bin Laden of Russia,” is a Chechen Islamist who has claimed responsibility for attacks on Russian civilians. According to media reports, his most recent threat was against the Olympics in Sochi, Russia. No terrorist attacks, however, occured during the games.


Russian media reports the appeal to recruit Umarov was issued by Dmitry Yarosh, the leader of the ultra-nationalist and fascist Right Sector. The group is aligned with other extreme nationalist groups in Ukraine, including “Trident,” Patriot of Ukraine, “White Hammer” and the Ukrainian National Assembly – Ukrainian National Self Defense. Although it is not associated with the largest nationalist political party in the country, Svoboda, it has “a lot of common positions when it comes to ideological questions,” according to Yarosh.


The Voice of Russia reports:


President Yunus-bek Yevkurov of Ingushetia said that with his appeal to the leader of gangsters in the North Caucasus Doku Umarov, the leader of the Right Sector in Ukraine Dmitry Yarosh has confirmed that those who had been gangsters in the North Caucasus were also in Independence Square in Kiev. That appeal puts the Right Sector on a par with international terrorist organizations, he pointed out. He said that he was interested in the West’s response to this appeal because the West supported the new power in Ukraine.



There is a growing consensus in the United States Congress to support diplomatically, economically and, to a lesser degree, militarily the coup government in Ukraine.


Umarov’s connection to U.S. intelligence and the State Department


In April, 2013, we reported on Umarov’s shady connections. According to research conducted by Eric Draitser and others, Umarov’s Kavkaz Center was funded by the State Department and several supporting fronts including the National Endowment for Democracy-funded Russian-Chechen Friendship Society.


The militant Chechen effort to undermine Russia is supported by a number of influential neocons. “Despite the fact that organs such as Kavkaz Center operate in the service of terrorists who advocate the destruction of Russia, their activity alone is not altogether significant if seen in a vacuum,” writes Draitser.


Rather, it is the association of these types of individuals and organizations with the US State Department and US intelligence that makes them particularly insidious.  One such entity that bears scrutiny is the American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC), previously known as the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya.  As reported by Right Web at the Institute for Policy Studies, “The ACPC was founded in 1999 by Freedom House, a neoconservative organization that has worked closely with the U.S. government, receiving funds from the National Endowment for Democracy and other U.S. democratization initiatives.”  This intimate relationship between the ACPC and the US State Department indicates not merely a confluence of interests, but rather a direct relationship wherein the former is an organ of the latter.



This article was posted: Sunday, March 2, 2014 at 12:28 pm









Infowars



Right Sector Calls On Russia’s Bin Laden to Fight in Ukraine

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

FBI had human source in contact with bin Laden as far back as 1993


Guy Taylor and John Solomon
The Washington Times
February 26, 2014


022614fbi
In a revelation missing from the official investigations of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the FBI placed a human source in direct contact with Osama bin Laden in 1993 and ascertained that the al Qaeda leader was looking to finance terrorist attacks in the United States, according to court testimony in a little-noticed employment dispute case.


The information the FBI gleaned back then was so specific that it helped thwart a terrorist plot against a Masonic lodge in Los Angeles, the court records reviewed by The Washington Times show.


“It was the only source I know in the bureau where we had a source right in al Qaeda, directly involved,” Edward J. Curran, a former top official in the FBI’s Los Angeles office, told the court in support of a discrimination lawsuit filed against the bureau by his former agent Bassem Youssef.


Read more


This article was posted: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 at 12:34 pm










Infowars



FBI had human source in contact with bin Laden as far back as 1993

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

DoD Gave Order to “Destroy” Bin Laden Death Photos Hours After FOIA Request

DoD Gave Order to “Destroy” Bin Laden Death Photos Hours After FOIA Request
http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/february2014/110214laden.jpg


Cover-up: Pentagon desperate to keep images out of public domain


Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
February 11, 2014


U.S. Special Operations Commander Admiral William McRaven ordered his subordinates to destroy photos showing the corpse of Osama Bin Laden just hours after an FOIA lawsuit seeking the documents was filed in the United States Court for the District of Columbia.


DoD Gave Order to Destroy Bin Laden Death Photos Hours After FOIA Request 110214laden

Image: Osama Bin Laden (YouTube).



Judicial Watch, the group that filed the initial FOIA request, published an email released to them by the Department of Defense in which McRaven writes;


One particular item that I want to emphasize is photos; particularly UBLs remains. At this point – all photos should have been turned over to the CIA; if you still have them destroy them immediately or get them to the [redacted].



The email was sent on Friday, May 31, 2011 at 5:09pm, hours after Judicial Watch held a morning press conference announcing that their FOIA request had been filed in court.


“The move by McRaven to purge the photos appears to have come, at least in part, in response to aggressive efforts by Judicial Watch to obtain images of the deceased bin Laden that President Obama, in a rewrite of federal open records law, had refused to disclose,” writes the whistleblower organization.


According to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, the “email is a smoking gun, revealing both contempt for the rule of law and the American’s people right to know. The Obama administration has tried to cover this scandal up – and our lawsuit exposed it. We demand further investigation of the effort to destroy documents about the bin Laden raid.”


Why did McRaven order the photos to be destroyed? Why is the Pentagon so desperate to keep the images out of the public domain?


Is it because the images are fake, that they do not show wounds consistent with the narrative surrounding the Navy SEAL raid on Bin Laden’s compound, or that they are dated from years previously?


DoD Gave Order to Destroy Bin Laden Death Photos Hours After FOIA Request 110214doc

Image: Judicial Watch.



As we have exhaustively documented, the story surrounding the raid is dubious at best and has been changed on numerous occasions.


Last year, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh said that the whole incident was “one big lie” and that “not one word” of the Obama administration’s narrative on what happened was true.


Speculation that the Obama administration may have embellished or outright lied about the true account of what happened has persisted, mainly because the White House has refused to publicly release images of Bin Laden’s body.


Although the White House said the corpse was immediately “buried at sea” in line with Islamic tradition, it quickly emerged that this was not standard practice.


Numerous analysts have claimed that Bin Laden had in fact been dead for years and that the raid on his alleged compound in Pakistan was little more than a stunt.


Other questions also persist, such as why the narrative and timeline of the raid has changed multiple times, why the White House initially claimed that “situation room” photos showed Obama watching the raid live when in fact there was a blackout on the live feed, and whyneighbors in the immediate area surrounding the compound said with absolute certainty that they had never seen Bin Laden and that they knew of no evidence whatsoever to suggest he lived there.


Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet


*********************


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.


This article was posted: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 at 7:34 am









Prison Planet.com




Read more about DoD Gave Order to “Destroy” Bin Laden Death Photos Hours After FOIA Request and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

US Admiral: Destroy bin Laden photos

US Admiral: Destroy bin Laden photos
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif



A top US military commander had secretly ordered the destruction of any photographs of the corpse of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden days after his alleged death, a new document reveals.



Commander of US Special Operations Command Adm. William McRaven told military officers 11 days after the killing to destroy any photographs or turn them over to the CIA, according to an email obtained by the conservative legal group Judicial Watch, the Associated Press reported on Monday.


“One particular item that I want to emphasize is photos; particularly UBLs [Usama Bin Laden] remains. At this point – all photos should have been turned over to the CIA; if you still have them destroy them immediately or get them” a blacked-out location, McRaven told his unnamed subordinates in a heavily blacked-out email addressed to “gentlemen.”


Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said that the email “is a smoking gun, revealing both contempt for the rule of law and the American people’s right to know.”


The United States announced on May 2, 2011 that bin Laden was killed by American forces in his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan.


A number of media reports later said the US government was moving to hide files about the US military’s suspected raid on Osama bin Laden.


The lack of transparency over bin Laden’s death has cast further doubt over the announcement.


McRaven’s order came just 10 days after The Associated Press asked for the photos and other documents under the US Freedom of Information Act.


On May 3, 2011, the AP asked Special Operations Command’s Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Division office for “copies of all e-mails sent from and to the US government account or accounts” of McRaven referencing bin Laden. McRaven was then vice admiral.


A May 4, 2011, response from the command’s FOIA office to the AP acknowledged the bin Laden document request and said it had been assigned for processing. AP did not receive a copy of the McRaven email obtained by Judicial Watch.


The Department of Defense FOIA office told the AP in a Feb. 29, 2012 letter that it could find no McRaven emails “responsive to your request” for communications about the bin Laden material.


In an interview with Press TV last year, American professor Kevin Barrett said “it does not make any sense that we accept the official version of this killing of bin Laden.”


“It’s pretty hard to understand exactly why all the secrecy. One hypothesis is that they didn’t kill bin Laden at all and the whole thing is basically a hoax. There have been all kinds of reports that bin Laden died in 2001 and we have Egyptian and Pakistani media report his funeral in 2001,” Barrett explained.
 
“We do know that most of the so-called bin Laden tapes that were released after 2001 are definitely fake,” he said. “That would support the idea that maybe he actually died in 2001.”


AGB/AGB




PRESS TV RSS News




Read more about US Admiral: Destroy bin Laden photos and other interesting subjects concerning U.S. News Report at TheDailyNewsReport.com

DoD Gave Order to “Destroy” Bin Laden Death Photos Hours After FOIA Request

DoD Gave Order to “Destroy” Bin Laden Death Photos Hours After FOIA Request
http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/february2014/110214laden.jpg


Cover-up: Pentagon desperate to keep images out of public domain


Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
February 11, 2014


U.S. Special Operations Commander Admiral William McRaven ordered his subordinates to destroy photos showing the corpse of Osama Bin Laden just hours after an FOIA lawsuit seeking the documents was filed in the United States Court for the District of Columbia.


Image: Osama Bin Laden (YouTube).



Judicial Watch, the group that filed the initial FOIA request, published an email released to them by the Department of Defense in which McRaven writes;


One particular item that I want to emphasize is photos; particularly UBLs remains. At this point – all photos should have been turned over to the CIA; if you still have them destroy them immediately or get them to the [redacted].



The email was sent on Friday, May 31, 2011 at 5:09pm, hours after Judicial Watch held a morning press conference announcing that their FOIA request had been filed in court.


“The move by McRaven to purge the photos appears to have come, at least in part, in response to aggressive efforts by Judicial Watch to obtain images of the deceased bin Laden that President Obama, in a rewrite of federal open records law, had refused to disclose,” writes the whistleblower organization.


According to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, the “email is a smoking gun, revealing both contempt for the rule of law and the American’s people right to know. The Obama administration has tried to cover this scandal up – and our lawsuit exposed it. We demand further investigation of the effort to destroy documents about the bin Laden raid.”


Why did McRaven order the photos to be destroyed? Why is the Pentagon so desperate to keep the images out of the public domain?


Is it because the images are fake, that they do not show wounds consistent with the narrative surrounding the Navy SEAL raid on Bin Laden’s compound, or that they are dated from years previously?


Image: Judicial Watch.



As we have exhaustively documented, the story surrounding the raid is dubious at best and has been changed on numerous occasions.


Last year, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh said that the whole incident was “one big lie” and that “not one word” of the Obama administration’s narrative on what happened was true.


Speculation that the Obama administration may have embellished or outright lied about the true account of what happened has persisted, mainly because the White House has refused to publicly release images of Bin Laden’s body.


Although the White House said the corpse was immediately “buried at sea” in line with Islamic tradition, it quickly emerged that this was not standard practice.


Numerous analysts have claimed that Bin Laden had in fact been dead for years and that the raid on his alleged compound in Pakistan was little more than a stunt.


Other questions also persist, such as why the narrative and timeline of the raid has changed multiple times, why the White House initially claimed that “situation room” photos showed Obama watching the raid live when in fact there was a blackout on the live feed, and whyneighbors in the immediate area surrounding the compound said with absolute certainty that they had never seen Bin Laden and that they knew of no evidence whatsoever to suggest he lived there.


Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet


*********************


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.


This article was posted: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 at 6:20 am


Tags: , ,










Infowars




Read more about DoD Gave Order to “Destroy” Bin Laden Death Photos Hours After FOIA Request and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

DoD Gave Order to “Destroy” Bin Laden Death Photos Hours After FOIA Request

DoD Gave Order to “Destroy” Bin Laden Death Photos Hours After FOIA Request
http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/february2014/110214laden.jpg


Cover-up: Pentagon desperate to keep images out of public domain


Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
February 11, 2014


U.S. Special Operations Commander Admiral William McRaven ordered his subordinates to destroy photos showing the corpse of Osama Bin Laden just hours after an FOIA lawsuit seeking the documents was filed in the United States Court for the District of Columbia.


Image: Osama Bin Laden (YouTube).



Judicial Watch, the group that filed the initial FOIA request, published an email released to them by the Department of Defense in which McRaven writes;


One particular item that I want to emphasize is photos; particularly UBLs remains. At this point – all photos should have been turned over to the CIA; if you still have them destroy them immediately or get them to the [redacted].



The email was sent on Friday, May 31, 2011 at 5:09pm, hours after Judicial Watch held a morning press conference announcing that their FOIA request had been filed in court.


“The move by McRaven to purge the photos appears to have come, at least in part, in response to aggressive efforts by Judicial Watch to obtain images of the deceased bin Laden that President Obama, in a rewrite of federal open records law, had refused to disclose,” writes the whistleblower organization.


According to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, the “email is a smoking gun, revealing both contempt for the rule of law and the American’s people right to know. The Obama administration has tried to cover this scandal up – and our lawsuit exposed it. We demand further investigation of the effort to destroy documents about the bin Laden raid.”


Why did McRaven order the photos to be destroyed? Why is the Pentagon so desperate to keep the images out of the public domain?


Is it because the images are fake, that they do not show wounds consistent with the narrative surrounding the Navy SEAL raid on Bin Laden’s compound, or that they are dated from years previously?


Image: Judicial Watch.



As we have exhaustively documented, the story surrounding the raid is dubious at best and has been changed on numerous occasions.


Last year, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh said that the whole incident was “one big lie” and that “not one word” of the Obama administration’s narrative on what happened was true.


Speculation that the Obama administration may have embellished or outright lied about the true account of what happened has persisted, mainly because the White House has refused to publicly release images of Bin Laden’s body.


Although the White House said the corpse was immediately “buried at sea” in line with Islamic tradition, it quickly emerged that this was not standard practice.


Numerous analysts have claimed that Bin Laden had in fact been dead for years and that the raid on his alleged compound in Pakistan was little more than a stunt.


Other questions also persist, such as why the narrative and timeline of the raid has changed multiple times, why the White House initially claimed that “situation room” photos showed Obama watching the raid live when in fact there was a blackout on the live feed, and whyneighbors in the immediate area surrounding the compound said with absolute certainty that they had never seen Bin Laden and that they knew of no evidence whatsoever to suggest he lived there.


Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet


*********************


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.


This article was posted: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 at 6:20 am


Tags: , ,










Infowars




Read more about DoD Gave Order to “Destroy” Bin Laden Death Photos Hours After FOIA Request and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Ben Dimiero: "Osama Bin Laden Is Our President Obama": The Year On The Fringe



On a rainy morning in October, Fox News reporter Doug McKelway sat in the passenger seat of a car cruising around the Washington, D.C., Beltway, delivering a live update to Fox & Friends.


McKelway was there to report on the arrival of what was supposed to be thousands of truckers protesting the Obama administration, an event that Fox and other conservative outlets had already given a significant publicity boost.


“What are you seeing there? Are there truckers all over the place, Doug?” asked Fox & Friends co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck.


Struggling against a janky satellite connection, McKelway explained, somewhat awkwardly, “We had expected to see literally dozens if not hundreds of trucks preparing for this protest. Instead, we saw maybe two, maybe three.”


“So far, it’s a light turnout … but you never know. It could surge,” co-host Brian Kilmeade reassured viewers.


It never did.


While the failed “Truckers Ride for the Constitution” was portrayed by conservative outlets like Fox as a gathering of Americans with reasoned objections to the Obama administration, it was actually co-organized by a fringe conspiracy theorist who apparently believes, among other things, that President Obama and Osama bin Laden are literally the same person.


That the rally had become mainstream news in the first place despite the outlandish views of its organizers – to the extent that Fox News had a reporter driving around attempting to offer live reports on it — was emblematic of the way fringe figures and conspiracy theories permeated the media in 2013.


“The Year Of Alex Jones” 


In April, Drudge Report operator Matt Drudge logged in to his often-baffling Twitter account and told his followers that he had “privately told friends [2013] would be year of Alex Jones,” adding that while they had never met or spoke, Drudge found his show to be “one hell of a broadcast in such homogenized media!” That Jones’ broadcast is unique is beyond question, but what sets it apart is mostly Jones’ ability to take current events and run them through his conspiracy theory blender.


Declaring 2013 the “Year of Alex Jones” was something of a self-fulfilling prophecy for Drudge, as his website has served as Jones’ traffic pipeline for years. By the time he sent his tweet in April, Drudge had already linked to at least 50 separate articles on Jones’ Infowars website in the first few months of the year. (A Media Matters study found that Drudge had linked to at least 244 separate articles on Infowars between 2011 and 2013.) 


So how did Jones spend the “Year of Alex Jones”? By doing what he usually does – going on bizarre rants and spinning fantastical conspiracy theories. Among Jones’ 2013 lowlights were suggesting that a devastating May tornado could have been the result of a government “weather weapon,” because the government “can create and steer groups of tornadoes”; claiming that the September shooting at the Navy Yard in Washington, D.C., and a subsequent shooting near the Capitol could have been false flag attacks staged by the government; and explaining a convoluted conspiracy where globalists were using unrest in Syria in order to further their goal to replace humans with human-machine hybrids.


Drudge had company in mainstreaming Jones this year. The radio host was invited onto both CNN and Fox News for interviews at various points, and House Republicans proposed legislation based on a Jones-popularized conspiracy theory that the government was stockpiling ammunition for nefarious purposes. 


When Drudge made his proclamation about Jones, the host was fresh off accusing the government of being the “prime suspect” in April’s Boston Marathon bombings. But Jones certainly wasn’t alone; the Boston bombings brought out the worst in many conservative media outlets.


Glenn Beck, for example, spent several segments obsessing over the supposed involvement of a Saudi national in the bombings, smearing a victim of the attacks and calling for people to demand impeachment over the surrounding government cover-up. (Beck’s theory, for the record, was total nonsense.)


And being Glenn Beck, that may not even qualify as his most absurd conspiracy theory of 2013. In May, when a man opened fire in a Houston airport before Beck was scheduled to give a speech at the annual NRA conference, Beck told his viewers that there was “a very good chance” the shooting was a “setup” like “the burning of the Reichstag.”


Other media figures engaging in Jones-esque conspiracies this year include:


  • Gun activist Larry Pratt – who has also made several appearances in mainstream outlets this year to discuss gun legislation – joined fringe radio host Stan Solomon while the latter laid out his theory that the Obama administration was planning to ”put together a racial force to go against an opposite race resistance, basically a black force to go against a white resistance, and then they will claim anyone resisting the black force they are doing it because they are racist.”

  • Rush Limbaugh cited an unsourced report on a random conservative website to claim that Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett was the key decision-maker during the 2012 Benghazi attacks. 

  • Conservative bloggers suggested that a picture of Obama shooting skeet that was released by the White House early this year was Photoshopped. Their evidence included that Obama wasn’t wearing a hat to block the sun from his eyes like “most shooters” do, even though the president was wearing sunglasses in the photo.

  • Conservative columnist and frequent Hannity panelist Erik Rush cited the “unresolved Trinity United murders” – a conspiracy theory about President Obama and his associates murdering members of Obama’s former church to conceal the president’s supposed hidden homosexuality –as a reason Obama himself may have “orchestrated” the 2012 attacks in Benghazi.

The Year In Which President Obama Resigned Twice


Had all gone according to plan, fringe activists would have caused President Obama to resign at least twice this year. 


Starting in September, the aforementioned “Truckers Ride for the Constitution” group started organizing an event to clog traffic on the Beltway near the nation’s capital, hoping to prompt the president’s resignation.


The event was given a boost by conservative sites like the Drudge Report, Fox Nation, and others, including WND. Co-organizer Zeeda Andrews was even invited onto Fox News (and Glenn Beck’s show) to promote the rally. During her appearances, she discussed why she wanted Obama removed from office: because “he is a threat to our national security.” Her concerns about the threat to national security posed by Obama were apparently quite grave, considering she apparently believes the president is, somehow, the same person as Osama bin Laden.


After Andrews and the rally received major publicity from conservative outlets, Media Matters took a look at her presence on social media sites and found that she believed, among other things, that “Obama is a secret Muslim; that the Boston bombings were a ’false flag’; that the CIA murdered BuzzFeed journalist Michael Hastings; and that the Department of Homeland Security is stockpiling ammunition in order to slaughter Americans.”


In a comment posted to YouTube, Andrews told people to “do your research” about how “Osama Bin Laden is our President Obama”:


The fact that these soldiers were set up to die in a no return operation is obvious they had knowledge that Obama didn’t want leaked. This is the Seals that killed Osama Bin Laden. I don’t believe this story. He is alive call me crazy but, Osama Bin Laden is our President Obama do your research. The CIA has been preparing for this since he was a boy. They have same height, bone structure, hands and ears both are left handed the Osama face was created by Hollywood. The fox is in the hen house.



The “we’ll drive in circles, which will cause Obama to resign” plan apparently made as little sense to the truckers who were supposed to join as it did to befuddled onlookers, considering barely anyone showed up for the rally.


That Obama was still in office after the failed trucker rally opened the door for another failed attempt by fringe activists to prompt his removal. In November, WND columnist Larry Klayman organized a “Second American Revolution” that sought the resignations of Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and House Speaker John Boehner. While the gathering fell roughly 999,870 people short of its goal to get “millions to occupy Washington, D.C.,” the attendees did include a man wearing a George Washington costume.


And there should be no shortage of fringe rallies in the new year. Activist and conspiracist Adam Kokesh had planned an armed march on Washington, D.C., in July of this year, but it fell apart. Afterward, Kokesh told Alex Jones that he was hoping to organize a march on July 4, 2014, with the goal of achieving an “orderly dissolution of the federal government.”


Which seems likely.




Media Matters for America



Ben Dimiero: "Osama Bin Laden Is Our President Obama": The Year On The Fringe

Friday, October 18, 2013

Pakistan TV Exposes Osama bin Laden Killing Hoax, Documentary Debunks 9/11 Official Story



osama


“Pakistan TV Exposes bin Laden Killing Hoax” and Documentary Exposes 9/11 Official Story”


Original Bashir interview that contradicts Washington’s account of killing bin Laden

A website in the UK, themindrenewed.com, that downloaded the video from the link in my original report of the Pakistani TV interview with Mohammad Bashir has posted the interview with the original English subtitles. You can view it here:


 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xffT-8R38lQ [1]


 This interview of an eyewitness to the entire event is powerful evidence that the Obama regime’s story of the killing of Osama bin Laden and his burial at sea is a hoax and a lie. Pakistani Samaa TV confirms that Bashir is who he says he is and that he lives next to the alleged bin Laden compound. Samaa TV also confirms that neighbors knew the residents of the “compound.” There has never been any mention of the Bashir interview in the presstitute media.


http://themindrenewed.com/interviews/2013/334-int-32 [2]
Published on Oct 16, 2013
Mohammad Bashir, Abbottabad resident and neighbour to the alleged “compound” of Osama bin Laden, gives his eyewitness account of what he saw happen on 2 May 2011 (local time), when – according to the official story – US Navy SEALs assassinated Osama bin Laden. In this interview, soon after the event, with a Pakistan national TV station (Samaa.tv), Bashir gives an account which fundamentally contradicts the official story.




For a transcript of the interview, please see: http://paulcraigroberts.org/2013/09/16/pakistani-national-tv-reveals-that-obamas-claim-to-have-killed-osama-bin-laden-is-an-american-hoax-paul-craig-roberts/


http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/sections/index.php?op=viewarticle&artid=167 [4]
2. On YouTube:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1GCeuSr3Mk (Preview)  [5]






About the author:


Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal, has held numerous university appointments. He is a frequent contributor to Global Research.




Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]


www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


For media inquiries: [email protected]





Global Research



Pakistan TV Exposes Osama bin Laden Killing Hoax, Documentary Debunks 9/11 Official Story

Monday, July 15, 2013

Osama Bin Laden Tim Osman Blamed for 9/11 In One Second


Osama Bin Laden Tim Osman Blamed for 9/11 In One Second

Osama Bin Laden Blamed for 9/11 In One Second why was osama bin laden blamed for 911.
Video Rating: 5 / 5



Rita Cosby Osama Bin Laden blamed in Seconds for 9-11

Rita Cosby Osama Bin Laden blamed in Seconds for 9-11.
Video Rating: 5 / 5



Osama Bin Laden Tim Osman Blamed for 9/11 In One Second