Showing posts with label USAID. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USAID. Show all posts

Sunday, April 6, 2014

USAID Subversion in Latin America Not Limited to Cuba

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



USAID Subversion in Latin America Not Limited to Cuba

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Crisis in the Ukraine: USAID Support for Destabilization of Russia


Wayne Madsen
Libya 360°
January 22, 2014


Editor’s note: Now that security forces in Ukraine are allegedly shooting protestors, corporate media coverage in the United States will focus on the violence and calls for President Viktor Yanukovich to step aside. The situation in Ukraine, however, is not entirely as the corporate media would have us believe. Wayne Madsen provides a look at the effort by the United States to destabilize not only Ukraine, but Russia. The crisis in the Ukraine provides an additional headache for Russia as it deals with terrorist threats on the eve of its hosting the Winter Olympics in Sochi.


Police crackdown on the streets of Kiev.


One “themed revolution”, for which the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and its allied operatives of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the George Soros Open Society Institute have become so infamous, went virtually unnoticed in the English language Western media.


In 2010, anti-Russian government provocateurs, financed by Western non-governmental organizations (NGOs), staged a number of protests featuring plastic blue buckets. The buckets were meant to symbolize the portable flashing blue lights, known in Russian as migalki, used atop many vehicles for Russian VIPs, including government officials and private businessmen.


The themed blue bucket protests were directly linked to the “pro-democracy” activities of USAID in Russia. American-backed provocateurs began placing blue buckets on top of their cars to mock the use of blue lights by officials. In response, three parties represented in the State Duma, United Russia, A Just Russia, and the Liberal Democratic Party, proposed a bill to crack down on the use of the blue buckets by protesters who were intent on causing traffic problems, sometimes resulting in vehicle accidents.


U.S. NGO support for the “blue bucket” revolution preceded by a year the nomination by President Barack Obama of anti-Russian activist Michael McFaul as the U.S. ambassador to Russia. McFaul began his tenure in Moscow by opening up the U.S. embassy to all sorts of anti-Russian political activists, provocateurs, and troublemakers.


These political provocateurs, which include People’s Freedom Party leader political blogger Aleksey Navalny, “Left Front” Sergey Udaltsov, chess celebrity Garry Kasparov, Russian “cover girl” Ksenia Sobchak, “Solidarity” co-leader Ilya Yashin, Boris Nemtsov, neo-fascist National Bolshevik Party leader Eduard Limonov, Yabloko Party leader Sergey Mitrokhin, and Lev Ponomarev were all well-schooled in the use of various devices and contrivances to gain media attention for their political causes and protests.


Themed street protests were used by Gene-Sharp-trained activists in a number of CIA- and Soros-advanced political operations. The first such group to successfully oust a government was OTPOR, which led protests that ejected Slobodan Milosevic as president of Serbia. Other groups backed by U.S.-trained activists included Kmara in Georgia, Pora in Ukraine, KelKel in Kyrgyzstan, and Zubr in Belarus.


The art of using symbols such as the clenched fist and devices like blue buckets was developed by civil disobedience “guru” Gene Sharp of the Albert Einstein Institution and Harvard. Sharp’s work on “non-violent” actions to bring down governments was adopted by the CIA to foment rebellions in countries in the post-Soviet and Soviet bloc space. Sharp denies his work is connected to U.S. intelligence, however, it has been funded by the largest funding pools used by the CIA for contract work by academia. Sharp has been directly funded by the RAND Corporation, Ford Foundation, and NED. His work also received funding from the International Republican Institute, an arm of the U.S. Republican Party.


Sharp’s call for cultural, religious, and historical icons to be ridiculed in small and large mass protests have often led to violent responses, thus driving a stake through Sharp’s contention that his blueprint for political change is “non-violent.”


McFaul was recruited from the right-wing, neo-conservative Hoover Institution at Stanford University to serve as Obama’s envoy to Russia. McFaul served on the boards of a number of Cold War-oriented NGOs, including Freedom House, the Soros-linked Eurasia Foundation, and the USAID-funded NED.


The coordinator of the “Society of Blue Buckets” was Peter Shkumatov. The activities of the Shkumatov and his traffic disruptors included some of McFaul’s frequent embassy guests, notably Nemtsov and Udaltsov.


One Blue Bucket protester was shown wearing an Obama t-shirt in a video uploaded to YouTube on May 5, 2010. The video was produced by Nikita Tatarsky for the CIA- and Soros-controlled Russian service of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Other Blue Bucket protesters confused police by placing blue buckets on top of their vehicles, resulting a traffic snarls in downtown Moscow. If it were discovered that the Russian embassy in Washington organized protesters to place official-looking devices on their vehicles there would be two immediate reactions: criminal charges for impersonating law enforcement officers and a strong diplomatic protest with the Russian government.


It was not until September 2012, over two years after USAID was linked to the Blue Buckets, that President Vladimir Putin ordered USAID out of Russia. Some 57 NGOs in Russia were said to receive official financial support from USAID. That number did not count the unofficial support rendered by USAID to other groups, some with close links to terrorist groups in the Russian Caucasus region, particularly Chechnya and Dagestan.


In keeping with Sharp’s protest group template, the Society of Blue Buckets was divided into wings of “doves” and “hawks” all under an official organization with an official website called ru-verderko.ru, which translates to English as “ru-pail.ru.” By not calling the website “blue bucket”, the provocateurs left open the possibility of changing their target to other migalki colors, including the red used for emergency and police vehicles in the event the protesters decided to raise the stakes in their anti-government activities.


The Blue Bucket organization was careful to disseminate the information that it would be supported by dues and donations so that it would not be connected to McFaul and the U.S. embassy. However, a number of Russian disruptive organizations received “donations” from entities linked directly to Soros, USAID, and NED. The “Blue Buckets” registered with the Russian government as a public organization by paying the standard fee of 35,000 rubles, a little over $ US 1000.


Russia accuses West of meddling in Ukraine.


Blue Bucket protesters were witnessed walking across official vehicles with “migalki” lights even on Red Square. Comparatively, if protesters jumped on US Secret Service vehicles at the White House, there would be a very good chance they would be shot dead by law enforcement. Russian authorities displayed relative restraint in dealing with the Blue Buckets.


The anti-Christian and anti-Muslim FEMEN group, which was established by American Zionist financiers in Ukraine, also took up the Blue Bucket cause. Topless FEMEN protesters were seen at various Blue Bucket protests around Moscow making obscene gestures with blue buckets.


The use of cheap trinkets like blue buckets in Russia and white clothing and eye coverings in China are examples of the subterfuge engaged in by the Sharp / Soros / NED public opinion manipulators. In Indonesia, it was the cheap rubber and plastic sandal that became the symbol of an aborted popular movement against the government. In 2012, a 15-year old bot was sentenced to a five-year prison sentence for allegedly stealing the old worn-out sandals of a police officer that were lying outside a police station in Palu in central Sulawesi. The sentence resulted in a massive protest in which people left sandals and flip-flops outside of police stations across Indonesia. The movement, which was linked to USAID, Soros, and NED manipulators, never got off the ground and President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono was not driven from office.


While the democracy manipulators brag about their successes, they never want to write or talk about their failures, of which there are many. The Blue Bucket, White, Sandal, Lotus, Jasmine, Cedar, Green, and Orange Revolution II capers in Russia, China, Indonesia, Egypt, Tunisia, Lebanon, Iran, and Ukraine, respectively, were all miserable failures…


As long as Obama, Soros, McFaul and their ilk continue to try to set the clock back to the Cold War, their paid agent provocateurs will continue to suffer failure after failure until their “bag of tricks”, blue buckets, white sheets, sandals, topless tramps, and otherwise, are no longer worthy of the public’s attention.


This article was posted: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 at 4:46 pm









Infowars



Crisis in the Ukraine: USAID Support for Destabilization of Russia

Thursday, November 7, 2013

USAID, Uribe and Venezuelan Opposition Plotting Violence, Sabotage and Scarcity; According to Leaked Document


Source: Venezuela Analysis

US and Colombian organisations are working with the Venezuela’s political opposition to sabotage Venezuelan infrastructure, create deadly street violence, exacerbate food scarcity and provoke an international intervention, according to documents obtained by attorney and journalist Eva Golinger.


“Foreign interests, from Colombia and the US, are working with opposition groups inside Venezuela to destabilize his [President Nicolas Maduro"s] government, aiming towards sabotaging the upcoming December 8 municipal elections,” Golinger told VA via email on Wednesday.


First revealed by Golinger in a piece published by RT, the document titled, “Venezuelan Strategic Plan,” outlines a 15 point plan to be implemented as part of an on-going campaign against the Venezuelan government.


“The plan, agreed by consensus with worthy representatives of the opposition to the government of Nicolas Maduro, focuses on these objectives with the continued strong support of several global personalities, with the function of returning to Venezuela true democracy and independence, that have been kidnapped over 14 years,” the document states in an introductory paragraph.


It then continues by listing a series of 15 “actions” in point form.


The third point appears to endorse sabotage.


“Maintain and increase the sabotage that affect the population’s services, particularly the electricity system, that puts blame on the government for assumed inefficiencies and negligence,” it states.


This advice is followed by calls to, “Create situations of crisis in the streets that facilitate the intervention of North America and the forces of NATO, with support of the government of Colombia.”


“Whenever possible, the violence should cause deaths and injuries. Encourage hunger strikes of numerous days, massive mobilisations, problems in the universities and other sectors of society now identified with government institutions,” the document states.


Another point also states, “increase the problems with scarcity of basic products of the food basket.”


The document further advocates for supporting “the normalisation of US-Venezuelan relations”, and also advises the opposition to “Maintain and increase the campaign against Cuban interference”.


The Usual Suspects


“President Maduro has denounced these plots over the past few months, but most international media, and local private media, have ridiculed him and dismissed the information. Now, this document puts names and details to what Maduro has been denouncing,” Golinger told VA.


According to Golinger, the document was produced at the time of a meeting in June between US based FTI Consulting, the Colombian organisations Fundación Centro de Pensamiento Primero Colombia (Centre for Thought Foundation of Colombia First) and Fundación Internacionalismo Democratico (Democratic Internationalism Foundation). The Colombian organisations appear to be linked to former Colombian president Alvaro Uribe.


The logos of all three organisations are present in the header.


“The source of the document is the three organizations in the header that appear to have prepared the plan. I can’t reveal my source as to how I obtained it, but the authorship belongs to those organizations,” Golinger stated.


A long-time critic of former Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez and his successor, Uribe admitted last year that he had wanted to take military action against Venezuela during his presidency, but “lacked time”. He has met with numerous Venezuelan opposition figures in recent years, though former opposition presidential candidate Henrique Capriles has tried to distance himself from Uribe.


According to Golinger, the June meeting was also attended by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) regional head Mark Feierstein, psychologist and political strategist Juan Jose Rendon and leaders of the Venezuelan opposition including Maria Corina Machado, Julio Borges and Ramon Guillermo Avelado.


Machado was a signatory of the Carmona Decree, which suspended the National Assembly and declared Pedro Carmona head of state during the 2002 coup that temporarily ousted Chavez, and in June the Venezuelan government released an audio recording that allegedly implicated her in another coup plot.


A co-founder of the opposition party Primero Justicia and current member of the AN, Borges was reportedly a ringleader of a campaign by opposition legislators to not recognise Maduro’s presidential victory in April. He was involved in a brawl in the AN during a protest that month, and more recently was suspended from the ANfor 30 days for misconduct.


Aveledo is the executive secretary of the opposition umbrella group, the Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD).


Meanwhile, Rendon is an outspoken opponent of the Venezuelan government, and USAID has long been accused by leftist governments in Latin America of unduly interfering in the domestic affairs of countries including Venezuela. In a leaked 2006 US diplomatic memo published by Wikileaks earlier this year, then US ambassador to Venezuela William Brownfield stated that the “majority” of USAID’s operations in Venezuela were related to infiltrating and undermining the ruling socialist party (PSUV).


Media War


A number of the document’s recommendations also appear to relate to the opposition’s public relations campaign.


The first point advises the “Perfecting of Henrique Capriles’ confrontational and complainant discourse”, while another point advises the use of “short messages”.


Along with urging the opposition to reach out to “opinion and personality leaders” for support, the document also indicates the plan includes the recruiting of “Venezuelan and international journalists and reporters like: CNN, The New York Times, The New York Post, Reuters, AP, EFE, The Miami Herald, Time, BBC, El Pais, Clarin, ABC among others.”


Another point advocates for the strengthening of “lobbying with the governments of Latin America, mainly in those countries which may be more sensitive to pressure from our allies, consider Colombia, Peru, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay, Costa Rica, Guatemala, El Salvador, Mexico and Honduras”.


The document also marks Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua as allies of Venezuela.


Today, Maduro alleged that some media outlets are part of an “economic war driven by sectors of the Venezuelan right”.


“We can not allow them to use the media for psychological warfare; there is no country in the world that would allow it,” he stated.


“And it’s not just the far right wing that is involved, in the case of the US, members from the Obama administration are actively involved in this plan. The USAID director for Latin America was present at the meeting when the document was prepared,” Golinger told VA.


At the time of writing, USAID was yet to respond to the latest allegations, but in the past US officials have denied similar allegations of plotting against the government.


“We completely reject the Venezuelan government’s allegations of U.S. [sic] government involvement in any type of conspiracy to destabilize [sic] the Venezuelan government,” the US embassy said in a statement last month.


The statement was released after three US diplomats were expelled from Venezuela for allegedly meeting with members of the opposition aligned Sumate lobby group. The organisation was founded by Machado in 2002.


Capriles is also yet to respond. Today, the de facto opposition leader visited Pope Francis at the Vatican City. Capriles urged the Pope to take a mediatory role in Venezuelan politics.


“The word of the Holy Father for our beloved Venezuela is dialogue, we have asked for his mediation via the church if possible,” Capriles tweeted.


In an open letter to the Pope Capriles states, “[t]his is a government that feeds off fear, hatred and lies, and aims to make all Venezuelans live in darkness and division.”


However, the call for mediation comes just days after Capriles released a campaign video ahead of the 8 December municipal elections reiterating claims that Maduro won the 14 April presidential elections by fraud. He also accused the government of trying to intimidate voters by recording choices at the ballot box.


“A strategy they use is to say that they know who you vote for,” Capriles stated.


However, the Maduro administration doesn’t appear to have ever issued such threats, though it has repeatedly assured that votes remain anonymous.


Moreover, the latest allegations of US interference in Venezuelan politics also comes on the heels of the release of new US National Security Agency (NSA) documents by whistleblower Edward Snowden that identify Venezuela as a priority target for electronic eavesdropping in 2007.


The leaked NSA documents also indicate that “psychological operations” have been employed in Venezuela by the US.


According to Golinger, the document she revealed “evidences the very real, dangerous plans underway against the Venezuelan government”.


“Not only should we be concerned about these revelations, [the] international media should be ashamed for not taking them seriously before it’s too late,” Golinger stated.


“Coups happen, so do foreign interventions,” she wrote.




BlackListedNews.com



USAID, Uribe and Venezuelan Opposition Plotting Violence, Sabotage and Scarcity; According to Leaked Document