Showing posts with label changes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label changes. Show all posts

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Hyper-V Changes in Windows Server 2008 R2

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Hyper-V Changes in Windows Server 2008 R2

Friday, March 7, 2014

Facebook Announces Gun Policy Changes

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Facebook Announces Gun Policy Changes

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Canadian immigration changes called unfair



Canada said its termination of two investor immigrant programs does not target China, but Chinese agencies said the policy change is unfair.


Analysts said the Canadian policy may herald a new era that wealthy applicants must improve their social integration in and increase financial contributions to destination countries.


“All of Canada’s immigration programs are open to anyone who meets the criteria, and do not target specific countries,” the Canadian embassy in China told China Daily.


Citizenship and Immigration Canada said in a written interview that China “has been among the top sources for more than a decade”, and immigration is a key part of Canada’s plan to “grow our economy, spur job creation, and ensure long-term prosperity for all Canadians”.


Canadian immigration changes called unfair


Controversy arose after the Canadian government announced plans last week to terminate the federal Immigrant Investor Program and Federal Entrepreneur Program.


The IIP requires investors to have a minimum net worth of 1.6 million Canadian dollars ($ 1.5 million) and to invest 800,000 Canadian dollars in the form of a multiyear, interest-free loan to the government.


Citizenship and Immigration Canada said: “Research shows that immigrant investors pay less in taxes than other economic immigrants, are less likely to stay in Canada over the medium- to long-term and often lack the skills, including official language proficiency, to integrate as well as other immigrants from the same countries.”


Liu Qinglong, a professor at Tsinghua University’s School of Public Policy and Management, said the policy change illustrates Canada’s possible underestimation of decades of growing wealth in China and the consequent demand for migration.


“A low threshold brought unexpected investor immigrants, and consequently a range of issues,” Liu said.


Fiona Li, 30, a Chinese national working at an engineering business in Vancouver and a potential applicant for technology migration, said there is widespread discontent among residents about investor immigrants because of the latter’s inadequate contribution to communities.


“Many of them supported the policy change because they simply believe it is ‘totally unfair’ if the number of wealthy immigrants are not controlled. Some others insist that ‘money is not almighty, and a permanent residence should not be traded’,” Li said.


Frank Meng, who leads a consulting agency introducing investor immigrants to Canada, said it was not the first time Canada has raised immigration thresholds, and the programs’ termination, if passed by Canada’s Parliament, will disappoint the majority of the applicants


All 65,000 pending applications will reportedly be returned and paid fees refunded, and about 70 percent of the backlog came from Chinese applicants, the South China Morning Post reported.


“As far as I know, most of the applicants who submitted paperwork have waited for years — some even more than five years,” said Meng, president of Beijing Jiazhong Global Investment Consultation.


People may harbor doubts about the credibility of the government, he said.


China is the largest source of migrants in the world, and analysts said Chinese may alter their destinations given Canada’s policy changes.


Sun Zhe, director of the Center for US-China Relations at Tsinghua University, said: “Canada’s policy updates will hardly deter Chinese investor immigrants as a whole.”


North America and Europe will continue to have greater appeal to Chinese, and some may look to destinations including New Zealand and Singapore for lower tax rates, Sun said.


Wang Huiyao, director of the Center for China and Globalization, said some European countries may take the chance to offer lower thresholds to “attract wealthy Chinese who have impending needs for children’s education abroad or business expansion.”


It is also possible that some other destination countries may follow Canada to raise thresholds if its new immigrant programs prove a success,” Wang said.


Contact the writers at zhangyunbi@chinadaily.com.cn and mojingxi@chinadaily.com.cn






Canadian immigration changes called unfair

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Higher-income Americans hit hardest by tax changes







This Thursday, Jan. 9, 2013 photo, shows a 2013 1040-ES IRS Estimated Tax form at H & R Block tax preparation office in the Echo Park district of Los Angeles. “The United States income tax is a pay-as-you-go tax, which means that tax must be paid as you earn or receive your income during the year,” the IRS says. “You can either do this through withholding or by making estimated tax payments.” (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)





This Thursday, Jan. 9, 2013 photo, shows a 2013 1040-ES IRS Estimated Tax form at H & R Block tax preparation office in the Echo Park district of Los Angeles. “The United States income tax is a pay-as-you-go tax, which means that tax must be paid as you earn or receive your income during the year,” the IRS says. “You can either do this through withholding or by making estimated tax payments.” (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)





Graphic shows data for 2012 and 2013 tax returns; 2c x 3 inches; 96.3 mm x 76 mm;





FILE – This Oct. 18, 2012 file photo shows Edith Windsor interviewed at the offices of the New York Civil Liberties Union, in New York. When it comes to things like estate taxes, the federal recognition of same-sex marriage will help legally married gay and lesbian couples. That was the issue in the Supreme Court decision in the case of Windsor, who had to pay estate taxes after her lesbian spouse died. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — Higher-income Americans and some legally married same-sex couples are likely to feel the biggest hits from tax law changes when they file their federal returns in the next few months. Taxpayers also will have a harder time taking medical deductions.


In other changes for the 2013 tax year, the Alternative Minimum Tax has been patched — permanently — to prevent more middle-income people from being drawn in, and there’s a simpler way to compute the home office deduction.


Tax rate tables and the standard deduction have been adjusted for inflation, as has the maximum contribution to retirement accounts, including 401(k) plans and Individual Retirement Accounts.


The provisions were set by Congress last January as part of legislation to avert the fiscal cliff of tax increases and spending cuts. “We finally got some certainty for this year,” said Greg Rosica, a contributing author to Ernst & Young’s “EY Tax Guide 2014.”


Nevertheless, the filing season is being delayed because of the two-week government shutdown last October. The Internal Revenue Service says it needs the extra time to ensure that systems are in place and working. People will be able to start filing returns Jan. 31, a week and a half later than the original Jan. 21.


“People who are used to filing early in order to get a quick refund are just going to have to wait,” said Barbara Weltman, a contributing editor to “J.K. Lasser’s Your Income Tax 2014.”


No change in the April 15 deadline, however. That’s set by law and will remain in place, the IRS says.


HIGHER-INCOME TAXPAYERS


The tax legislation passed at the start of 2013 permanently extended the Bush-era tax cuts for most people, but also added a top marginal tax rate of 39.6 percent for those at higher incomes — $ 400,000 for single filers, $ 450,000 for married couples filing jointly and $ 425,000 for heads of household.


On top of that, higher-income taxpayers could see their itemized deductions and personal exemptions phased out and pay higher capital gains taxes — 20 percent for some taxpayers. And there are new taxes for them to help pay for health care reform.


There are different income thresholds for each of these new taxes.


An additional 0.9 percent Medicare tax, for example, kicks in on earnings over $ 250,000 for married couples filing jointly and $ 200,000 for singles and heads of household. Same for a 3.8 percent tax on investment income.


But the phase-out of personal exemptions and deductions doesn’t begin until $ 300,000 for married couples filing jointly and $ 250,000 for singles.


Taxpayers who didn’t plan could find themselves with big tax bills come April 15 — and perhaps penalties for under-withholding.


“It’s a snowball effect,” said Dave Du Val, TaxAudit.com’s vice president of customer advocacy.


Confused?


“The complexities of the tax code are only affecting those of us trying to read it,” National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson said in an interview. Tax software makes a lot of those complexities invisible to most people.


As a result, taxpayers might not realize they’re being helped by a wide array of deductions and credits. “They have no idea of the benefits they are getting through the tax code,” she said.


STOCK SALES


One simplification: Many investors will find it easier to report stock sales if the 1099-B forms they receive contain key details of the sale and the correct basis for computing gains and losses.


WHO’S FILING


The IRS processed more than 147 million tax returns in 2013, down slightly from the previous year. More than 109 million taxpayers received refunds that averaged $ 2,744, also slightly less than in 2012.


The upward trend of electronic filing continued, with more than 83 percent of returns being filed online. The biggest jump, 4.6 percent, was among people who used software programs to do their own taxes.


The IRS is continuing to offer its Free File option, which is available to taxpayers with adjusted gross incomes of $ 58,000 or less. These taxpayers can use brand-name software to file their taxes at no cost. Some states also participate. The agency also has an option for taxpayers of all incomes — Free File Fillable Forms — which does basic calculations but does not offer the guidance that a software package would.


For the 2013 tax year, the personal exemption is $ 3,900. The standard deduction is $ 12,200 for married taxpayers filing jointly, $ 6,100 for singles, and $ 8,950 for heads of household.


EDUCATION


Many credits and deductions were extended for 2013, including several for education. Among them: the American Opportunity Credit of up to $ 2,500 per student for tuition and fees and deductions for student loan interest and tuition-related expenses. Many of these are phased out at higher income levels.


Schoolteachers will still be able to deduct up to $ 250 in out-of-pocket expenses for books or other supplies.


MEDICAL EXPENSES


Taxpayers will still be able to deduct their medical expenses, but it will be more difficult for many to qualify. The threshold for deducting medical expenses now stands at 10 percent of adjusted gross income, up from 7.5 percent. There’s an exception, though, for those older than 65. For them, the old rate is grandfathered in until 2017.


HOME OFFICE DEDUCTION


Among the other changes for 2013, taxpayers who work at home will now have a simplified option for taking a home office deduction.


“You can claim this deduction for the business use of a part of your home only if you use that part of your home regularly and exclusively,” the IRS says.


But, if you sit at your kitchen table and check work email, it doesn’t qualify. “The regular and exclusive business use must be for the convenience of your employer and not just appropriate and helpful in your job,” according to the agency.


The IRS said that for tax year 2011, the most recent year for which numbers are available, more than 3.3 million people claimed nearly $ 10 billion in home office deductions using Schedule C. The number does not include the home office deduction taken by farmers, which is taken on a different form.


Most taxpayers claiming the deduction are self-employed, according to the IRS.


Until this year, you had to figure actual expenses for a home office, according to Weltman. “Starting with 2013 returns, if you’re eligible for the deduction, you can take a standard deduction of $ 5 per square foot, up to 300 square feet,” she said. The maximum deduction using this method is $ 1,500.


The IRS says people who take the simplified option will have to fill out one line on Schedule C, as opposed to a 43-line form.


Weltman likened the simplified home office deduction to the IRS deduction for business use of your car. “You can do your actual costs or the IRS mileage rates.”


The standard mileage rate for business use of a car in 2013 is 56.5 cents a mile.


SAME-SEX MARRIAGE


Beginning this year, same-sex couples who are legally married will for the most part have to choose married filing jointly or married filing separately when doing their tax returns. This is true even if they live in a state that does not recognize gay marriage.


Many of these couples will now find themselves hit by the marriage penalty, especially if both spouses work.


For example, with their incomes combined, they might hit the threshold for the extra Medicare taxes, or the beginning of the phase-out of deductions and the standard exemption.


However, when it comes to things like estate taxes, the federal recognition of same-sex marriage will help legally married gay and lesbian couples. That was the issue in the Supreme Court decision in the case of Edith Windsor, who had to pay estate taxes after her lesbian spouse died.


In addition, health insurance purchased from an employer for a same-sex spouse can be paid pre-tax and excluded from income.


“Like opposite-sex couples, gay and lesbian married couples can qualify to use the head-of-household status, when kids are involved, where the spouses are living apart,” the IRS says.


Same-sex married couples also have the option of filing amended returns going back to 2010, using the married-filing-jointly status. Rosica said couples will have to look at their individual circumstances to see if that’s beneficial from a tax perspective.


When it comes to filing state returns, same-sex married couples living in states that don’t recognize gay marriage most likely will have to file as singles. Since federal returns often are used as a starting point for state returns, that could force them to calculate their federal taxes twice, once for filing the federal return and once for figuring out their state taxes.


ENERGY EFFICIENCY


If you made energy efficiency improvements to your home, such as installing new windows or a qualifying furnace or heat pump, you might be able to take an energy credit of 10 percent of the cost up to a lifetime maximum of $ 500.


However, of that total, the IRS says, “only $ 200 can be for windows, $ 50 for any advanced main air circulating fan, $ 150 for any qualified natural gas, propane, or oil furnace or hot water boiler, and $ 300 for any item of energy-efficient building property.”


There are additional credits for solar. However, the credit for plug-in electric vehicles has expired.


Once again, the IRS is reminding taxpayers to make sure their Social Security numbers are entered correctly and their returns are signed. Those who feel they need more time can apply for an extension, until Oct. 15. But if you do file for an extension, remember to estimate and pay any taxes due — or face a possible penalty.


___


Online:


Internal Revenue Service: www.irs.gov


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



Higher-income Americans hit hardest by tax changes

Friday, January 10, 2014

"Obama Administration Changes The Definition Of "Civilians"" - M.O.C. #145

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


"Obama Administration Changes The Definition Of "Civilians"" - M.O.C. #145

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Bill changes to "simplify" energy











Households who have never switched energy suppliers may save more than £200 a year on their bills as reforms to the market come into effect.


Regulator Ofgem claims its banning of confusing and complex tariffs will create a simpler and clearer market.


Other changes include limiting suppliers to just four tariffs per customer for both electricity and gas and simplifying how prices are charged.


The body representing suppliers hopes the changes can rebuild consumer trust.


The moves are the result of a Retail Market Review which began in 2010.



‘Restore consumer confidence’

Further reforms will be introduced by April, including forcing suppliers to tell consumers which of their tariffs are the cheapest.


Ofgem chief executive Andrew Wright hopes the changes will ultimately drive down prices.


He said: “Profits are not an entitlement, they should be earned by companies competing keenly to offer consumers the lowest prices and the best service.


“Now it is up to suppliers to build on our reforms to restore consumer confidence in the energy market.


“There are good signs that they are taking up this challenge.”


Ofgem will produce an annual report to consumers on the health of competition in the market.


It has said it “will not hesitate to take further action” if it sees “evidence of further barriers to competition”.


Energy UK, which represents more than 80 energy providers and suppliers, said the reforms were essential to rebuilding trust with consumers.


Chief executive Angela Knight said: “If you look at the market now, the deals are fewer in number and much easier to compare.


“Customers will see improvements to the information they get as a result of energy companies bringing in the changes set out in the Retail Market Review.


“This should help people get the best deal.”


The latest reforms follow the introduction in October of new rules for fixed-term tariffs.


Suppliers are no longer allowed to increase prices during the course of a fixed term and must not automatically roll customers on to another fixed-term offer when their current one ends.



Will simplified bills affect you? Have you been put off changing suppliers because of confusing tariffs? If you are affected by this story, get in touch using the form below





Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | RFID | Amazon Affiliate

BBC News – Home

Bill changes to "simplify" energy

Thursday, December 26, 2013

The International Panel on Climate Change"s report in haiku and 19 watercolor paintings


Just downloading, much less reading, the entire 2,000-page-plus Fifth Assessment Report of the International Panel on Climate Change takes a long time. Anna Fahey reports on the images in that video above:


What if we could communicate the essence of this important information in plain language and pictures? Well, that’s just what one Northwest oceanographer has done. He’s distilled the entire report into 19 illustrated haiku.

The result is stunning, sobering, and brilliant. It’s poetry. It’s a work of art. But it doubles as clear, concise, powerful talking points and a compelling visual guide.


How did it come about? Housebound with a rotten cold one recent weekend, Greg Johnson found himself paring his key takeaways from the IPCC report into haiku. He finds that the constraints of the form focus his thoughts (he told me he posts exclusively in haiku on Facebook), and described the process as a sort of meditation. He never intended to share these “IPCC” poems.


Johnson’s daughter, an artist, inspired him to try his hand at watercolors. On a whim he illustrated each haiku and shared the results with family and a few friends. [...]

Condensing to this degree is not how scientists typically operate. But, as Johnson proves, scientists can also be poets. Still, he’s is quick to caution that this is his own unofficial artistic interpretation and that it omits all the quantitative details and the IPCC’s scientific qualifications.



Just goes to show how outstanding beauty can be created out of even grim tidings, which certainly is what the Fifth Assessment contains.



Daily Kos



The International Panel on Climate Change"s report in haiku and 19 watercolor paintings

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

[278] David Cameron Erases History, Big Changes For China, a Musical Peace Process

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


[278] David Cameron Erases History, Big Changes For China, a Musical Peace Process

Saturday, December 14, 2013

RI Town Voting on Recalls Over Gun Permit Changes


Residents in a small Rhode Island town are voting Saturday on whether four town council members should be recalled for proposing a change in the way the town issues gun permits.


The rare recall election was prompted by gun rights supporters who said the four Exeter council members ignored their objections to a failed proposal to allow the attorney general to oversee the town’s concealed weapons permits.


Both sides were concerned about low-turnout with snow in the forecast.


The four council members supported a resolution asking the state’s General Assembly to allow the state attorney general to process concealed weapons permits. Under current law, those seeking a permit may apply to either the attorney general or their local police. Since Exeter doesn’t have a police department — just a single town sergeant — the job now falls to the town clerk, who the council members said lacks the resources to conduct proper background checks.


Even though the council’s request never got a vote in the Assembly, gun rights supporters began petitioning for a recall, saying the town’s leaders had ignored the concerns of hundreds of people who turned out for a meeting on the proposal.


Debates about gun policy have sparked similar ouster efforts elsewhere. In September, two Democratic Colorado state senators were recalled over their support for changes to gun laws following the theater massacre outside Denver in 2012.


The recall vote coincidentally comes on the anniversary of the Newtown, Conn., school shooting.


The four officials being targeted by the recall effort are Council President Arlene Hicks and Councilmen Cal Ellis, Robert Johnson and William Monahan. All are Democrats. A fifth member is not up for recall: independent Councilman Raymond Morrissey Jr., who voted against the resolution.


Should one or more of the council members be recalled, their council seats will go to the losing candidates from the last election. Daniel W. Patterson would get the first seat, Edward F. Nataly the second and Lincoln P. Picillo the third.


The fourth seat would be filled by a council appointment.


Polls close at 8 p.m.


© Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.




Newsmax – America



RI Town Voting on Recalls Over Gun Permit Changes

Monday, August 12, 2013

Holder proposes changes in criminal justice system








This Oct. 4, 2010 file photo shows Attorney General Eric Holder speaking during a news conference at the Justice Department in Washington. Holder is calling for major changes to the nation’s criminal justice system that would scale back the use of harsh prison sentences for certain drug-related crimes, divert people convicted of low-level offenses to drug treatment and community service programs and expand a prison program to allow for release of some elderly, non-violent offenders. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File)





This Oct. 4, 2010 file photo shows Attorney General Eric Holder speaking during a news conference at the Justice Department in Washington. Holder is calling for major changes to the nation’s criminal justice system that would scale back the use of harsh prison sentences for certain drug-related crimes, divert people convicted of low-level offenses to drug treatment and community service programs and expand a prison program to allow for release of some elderly, non-violent offenders. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







WASHINGTON (AP) — With the U.S. facing massive overcrowding in its prisons, Attorney General Eric Holder is calling for major changes to the nation’s criminal justice system that would scale back the use of harsh sentences for certain drug-related crimes.


In remarks prepared for delivery to the American Bar Association in San Francisco, Holder also favors diverting people convicted of low-level offenses to drug treatment and community service programs and expanding a prison program to allow for release of some elderly, non-violent offenders.


“We need to ensure that incarceration is used to punish, deter and rehabilitate — not merely to convict, warehouse and forget,” Holder says in the speech he’s scheduled to deliver Monday.


In one important change, the attorney general is altering Justice Department policy so that low-level, non-violent drug offenders with no ties to large-scale organizations, gangs or cartels won’t be charged with offenses that impose mandatory minimum sentences.


Mandatory minimum prison sentences, a product of the government’s war on drugs in the 1980s, limit the discretion of judges to impose shorter prison sentences.


Under the altered policy, the attorney general said defendants will instead be charged with offenses for which accompanying sentences “are better suited to their individual conduct, rather than excessive prison terms more appropriate for violent criminals or drug kingpins.”


Federal prisons are operating at nearly 40 percent above capacity and hold more than 219,000 inmates — with almost half of them serving time for drug-related crimes and many of them with substance use disorders. In addition, 9 million to 10 million prisoners go through local jails each year. Holder praised state and local law enforcement officials for already instituting some of the types of changes Holder says must be made at the federal level.


Aggressive enforcement of federal criminal laws is necessary, but “we cannot simply prosecute or incarcerate our way to becoming a safer nation,” Holder said. “Today, a vicious cycle of poverty, criminality and incarceration traps too many Americans and weakens too many communities. However, many aspects of our criminal justice system may actually exacerbate this problem, rather than alleviate it.”


“We need to ensure that incarceration is used to punish, deter and rehabilitate — not merely to convict, warehouse and forget,” said the attorney general.


Holder said mandatory minimum sentences “breed disrespect for the system. When applied indiscriminately, they do not serve public safety. They have had a disabling effect on communities. And they are ultimately counterproductive.”


Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Rand Paul, R-Ky., have introduced legislation aimed at giving federal judges more discretion in applying mandatory minimums to certain drug offenders.


Holder said new approaches — which he is calling the “Smart On Crime” initiative — are the result of a Justice Department review he launched early this year.


The attorney general said some issues are best handled at the state or local level and said he has directed federal prosecutors across the country to develop locally tailored guidelines for determining when federal charges should be filed, and when they should not.


“By targeting the most serious offenses, prosecuting the most dangerous criminals, directing assistance to crime ‘hot spots,’ and pursuing new ways to promote public safety, deterrence, efficiency and fairness — we can become both smarter and tougher on crime,” Holder said.


The attorney general said 17 states have directed money away from prison construction and toward programs and services such as treatment and supervision that are designed to reduce the problem of repeat offenders.


In Kentucky, legislation has reserved prison beds for the most serious offenders and refocused resources on community supervision. The state, Holder said, is projected to reduce its prison population by more than 3,000 over the next 10 years, saving more than $ 400 million.


He also cited investments in drug treatment in Texas for non-violent offenders and changes to parole policies which he said brought about a reduction in the prison population of more than 5,000 inmates last year. He said similar efforts helped Arkansas reduce its prison population by more than 1,400. He also pointed to Georgia, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Hawaii as states that have improved public safety while preserving limited resources.


Holder also said the department is expanding a policy for considering compassionate release for inmates facing extraordinary or compelling circumstances, and who pose no threat to the public. He said the expansion will include elderly inmates who did not commit violent crimes and who have served significant portions of their sentences.


Associated Press




Top Headlines



Holder proposes changes in criminal justice system

Saturday, August 10, 2013

Man Changes Credit Card Terms Then Sues Bank


Nobody ever reads those annoying ‘terms and conditions’ these days – if they ever did; and apparently that includes banks. One man in Russia decided to write his won credit card terms and conditions – then handed them back to the bank who signed off on them without reading what they were signing. The man then proceeded to sue the bank. I think I love this guy. He played the devil at its own game and it looks like he’s got a good chance of coming out a winner. That’s the best story of heard all year:




World News Curator



Man Changes Credit Card Terms Then Sues Bank

Thursday, June 27, 2013

5 years of big changes in US


How much — and quickly — the country has changed in the past four years… Obama, in Africa, comments on the SCOTUS decisions and Snowden… Senate immigration bill hits the home stretch… Rubio: Immigration debate has been “a real trial for me”… Perry calls for another legislative session after the Wendy Davis filibuster… Massachusetts turnout: How low can you go?… Quinnipiac poll: Thompson makes his move in NYC mayoral race… And Jessica Taylor on the gay-marriage rulings and 2013.


By Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro, NBC News


*** Years of change: If you follow American politics day by day, tweet by tweet, poll by poll, and speech by speech, it’s easy to lose sight of the biggest story over the past five years — just how much change (both socially and demographically) this country has witnessed over the past four years. The nation has its first African-American president who won re-election a year ago. A majority of Americas now support gay marriage, and the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that married same-sex couples are entitled to federal benefits. The country is on track to be a majority-minority nation 30 years from now. And the Senate is poised to pass immigration legislation giving undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship. Taken together, this is a stunning amount of social change in a very short period of time. And all of that change helps to explain much of the partisanship and politics over the past four years. After all, when one side is pursuing change, the other side is often resisting it. In fact, the last time this country witnessed so much social change was in the 1960s (first Catholic president, civil-rights movement, environmental movement, Medicare, resistance to Vietnam War), and the politics back then was far nastier. Yet between the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision and Obama’s election, the country was mostly running in place when it came to big social change. It’s why the two parties for those 30-plus years worked so hard to copy each other, rather than distinguish themselves. That’s not true anymore. 


J. Scott Applewhite / AP



A gay rights activist runs out of the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, June 26, 2013, as rulings were handed down that impact same-sex relationships. In two separate and significant victories for gay rights, the Supreme Court struck down a provision of a federal law denying federal benefits to married gay couples and cleared the way for the resumption of same-sex marriage in California. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)




*** Obama comments on SCOTUS gay-marriage decisions: On his first full day in Africa, President Obama held a press conference with Senegal President Sall, and the headline from this very NEWSY presser was Obama suggesting it was his desire to apply the Supreme Court overturning the Defense of Marriage Act to all 50 states. “Well, first of all I think the Supreme Court ruling yesterday was not simply a victory for the LGBT community, I think it was a victory for American democracy.” He added, “It’s my personal belief, but I’m speaking now as a president as opposed to a lawyer, that if you’ve been married in Massachusetts and move some place else, you’re still married and that under federal law, you should be able to obtain the benefits of any lawfully married couple. But again I’m speaking as a president and not a lawyer.”



President Obama remarks on the situation with admitted NSA leaker Edward Snowden, saying he has no plans to disrupt relations with Russia and China, nor to scramble jets to capture the “29-year-old hacker.”



*** No map For Voting Rights Act? Maybe the biggest policy news from the press conference was how Obama reacted to the Supreme Court’s decision on the Voting Rights Act. While calling the decision a “mistake,” he also signaled he was opened to a new congressional remedy that did NOT include a special map. He simply called on Congress to pass a law that makes it easier for people to vote anywhere, in any district, any state. In other words, he’s open to Congress passing a law that doesn’t include a pre-clearance formula that singles out just a region or a state; instead, he wants it to pass legislation applying to all Americans. This opening bid on a compromise Voting Rights Act might not sit well with some civil rights groups, but it’s an acknowledgement by the president of what’s possible out of this Congress.


*** Obama calls Snowden just some “hacker”: The president, as aides have told us privately, is bemused by the media’s fascination with Edward Snowden. But he clearly doesn’t believe the hunt for Snowden is as big of a deal as the press is making it to be. While calling on any country that is contemplating helping him to return him to U.S. custody, he also downplayed the importance of the issue in regards to the relationship with China and Russia. He said he hasn’t spoken to either president about Snowden and said he didn’t want the issue so elevated it becomes a bargaining chip on other bilateral disagreements between the two other U.S. rivals. And of course, the quote of the press conference was in reference to Snowden and the idea the U.S. military could intervene:  I “won’t be scrambling jets to get a 29-year-old hacker.”


*** The rest of Obama’s day in Africa: Later today, Obama tours the Goree Island Slave House and Museum at 11:15 am ET, meets with U.S. embassy staff at 1:45 pm ET, and attends the official dinner with President Sall at 4:10 pm ET. In fact, the president hopes to bring a lot more attention to Africa beyond just answering questions about U.S. developments. At the end of his presser, he seemed to lecture the U.S. media, reminding them that focusing on Africa outside of crisis is important. He then noted that other U.S. economic rivals — including China and Brazil — had been more focused on Africa and that U.S. needed to match and surpass. It’ll be a theme of the president’s visits to all three countries on his Africa itinerary. Of course, hovering over the visit, Nelson Mandela’s health, a topic the president addressed generally, noting his first political activism as a young adult was at Occidental College protesting South African apartheid.


*** Senate immigration bill hits the home stretch: The Senate today holds a cloture vote (needing 60 to pass) on the overall “Gang of Eight” bipartisan immigration-reform bill; NBC’s Carrie Dann says the vote will take place around 11:30 am ET. Final passage is slated on Friday (30 hours after today’s cloture vote), but Senate Democratic leaders are hoping to obtain unanimous consent to move up the final-passage vote to today (and it’s looking like that’s going to happen). Meanwhile, Dann wraps two of yesterday’s developments. First: The Senate formally adopted the Hoeven-Corker “border surge” amendment by a 69-29 vote. Second: “After days of wrangling about edits to the bill, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Republican Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio clashed on the Senate floor over Portman’s calls for a standalone vote on an amendment he sponsored with Democrat Sen. Jon Tester to tighten rules regarding E-Verify, a system for employers to ensure that workers have legal status.” Bottom line: Don’t expect Portman to be among the Republicans supporting the legislation. And it means supporters might not get 70 votes for passage..


*** Rubio: Immigration debate has been “a real trial for me”: With the Senate slated to pass the immigration bill either today or tomorrow, “Gang of Eight” member Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) gave a speech addressing the criticisms he’s received from the right on his support for the bill. “Getting to this point has been very difficult. To hear the worry and the anxiety and the growing anger of the voices of so many people who helped get me elected to the Senate, who I agree with on virtually every other issue, it’s been a real trial for me,” he said on the Senate floor. “I know they love America, and they’re deeply worried about the direction this administration is trying to take our country. But when I was a candidate, I told you I wanted to come here and fight. I wanted to fight to protect what’s good for America. And fight to stop what’s bad for America. And I believe what we have no on immigration is hurting our country badly, and I simply wasn’t going to leave it to Democrats alone to figure out how to fix it.” Rubio now has political scars from this immigration debate. The question: Do these scars make him more formidable in the future (bipartisan achievement, taking on part of his party)? Or weaker?


*** Perry calls for another special legislative session: Yesterday, we wrote that the success of Wendy Davis’ filibuster in Texas would probably be short lived. And guess what: On Wednesday, Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) announced that he was calling for yet another special legislative to begin on July 1, so the state legislature could pass the anti-abortion measure Davis was filibustering. Meanwhile, just a day after the Supreme Court gutted the 1965 Voting Rights Act, Perry “signed the Lone Star State’s new congressional map into law, ending the state’s long and twisted redistricting saga of the 2012 cycle,” Roll Call says.


*** How low can you go? Yesterday, we also remarked on the VERY LOW turnout in Tuesday’s special Senate election in Massachusetts. Well, the turnout was even WORSE than we had thought. It saw the fewest people ever vote in a Senate race in Massachusetts. The secretary of state predicted 1.6 million would turnout — the lowest ever. But 400,000 fewer voters than that showed up.


*** Quinnipiac poll: Thompson makes his move in NYC mayoral race: After a Marist poll found Anthony Weiner jumping into the lead in the Democratic race for New York mayor, a new Quinnipiac poll shows a slightly different situation — a three-way tie. “Former City Comptroller William Thompson moves up as City Council Speaker Christine Quinn slumps to create a three-way tie for the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, with Quinn at 19 percent, former U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner at 17 percent and Thompson at 16 percent,” Quinnipiac says. The Marist poll also showed Thompson’s fav/unfav numbers spiking.


*** The gay-marriage rulings and 2013: Lastly, our colleague Jessica Taylor writes about how yesterday’s SCOTUS rulings could impact this year’s gubernatorial races. “In New Jersey, Democrat Barbara Buono finds herself polling far behind popular Republican Gov. Chris Christie, but she’s seized on Christie’s opposition to gay marriage as a possible boost for her uphill campaign. And in the much closer Virginia gubernatorial contest, Democrats have always pointed to GOP nominee Ken Cuccinelli’s conservative positions on social issues, but the ruling could be one way for them to get Democrats to go to the polls in an off-year contest where they’ve historically seen substantial drop off.” And by the way, Christie blasted the DOMA ruling, calling it “wrong” and an example of “judicial supremacy,” Politico writes.


Click here to sign up for First Read emails.
Text FIRST to 622639, to sign up for First Read alerts to your mobile phone.
Check us out on Facebook and also on Twitter. Follow us @chucktodd, @mmurraypolitics, @DomenicoNBC, @brookebrower


This story was originally published on






5 years of big changes in US

Monday, June 17, 2013

North Korea changes tack and tells US: Let"s talk








People walk past a roadside propaganda billboard promoting the “military first” policy and a boost to build the country’s economy in Pyongyang, North Korea, Sunday, June 16, 2013. North Korea’s top governing body on Sunday proposed high-level nuclear and security talks with the United States in an appeal sent just days after calling off talks with rival South Korea. (AP Photo/Alexander Yuan)





People walk past a roadside propaganda billboard promoting the “military first” policy and a boost to build the country’s economy in Pyongyang, North Korea, Sunday, June 16, 2013. North Korea’s top governing body on Sunday proposed high-level nuclear and security talks with the United States in an appeal sent just days after calling off talks with rival South Korea. (AP Photo/Alexander Yuan)





A woman rests under an umbrella while a man walks past her near a statue known as the Monument to the Three Charters for National Reunification, which symbolizes the hope for eventual reunification of the two Koreas, in Pyongyang, North Korea, Saturday, June 15, 2013. In past years, the monument built over the road leading to South Korea has been the site of celebrations marking a joint reconciliation declaration signed by the two Koreas on June 15, 2000. This year’s events were canceled after high-level talks between the Seoul and Pyongyang governments, the first in six years, were called off earlier in the week. (AP Photo/Alexander Yuan)





In this Friday June 14, 2013 photo, a music video about a song called “Reunification, June 15th” is shown on screens of an Air Koryo jet while on its way from Beijing to Pyongyang, North Korea. Korean on the screen read “Celebration for the June 15 joint-declaration.” Late North Korean leader Kim Jong Il and the late South Korean President Kim Dae Jung signed the June 15 declaration calling for the two Koreas to develop relations toward eventual reunification during a historic 2000 summit in Pyongyang. High-level talks between the Seoul and Pyongyang governments, the first in six years, were called off earlier in the week.(AP Photo/Alexander Yuan)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — After months of threatening to wage a nuclear war, North Korea did an about-face Sunday and issued a surprise proposal to the United States, its No. 1 enemy: Let’s talk.


But the invitation from North Korea’s National Defense Commission, the powerful governing body led by leader Kim Jong Un, comes with caveats: No preconditions and no demands that Pyongyang give up its prized nuclear assets unless Washington is willing to do the same — ground rules that make it hard for the Americans to accept.


Washington responded by saying that it is open to talks — but only if North Korea first shows it will comply with U.N. Security Council resolutions and live up to its international obligations.


State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the U.S. has seen no evidence that Pyongyang’s offer of talks is different from numerous others it’s made over the years that have yielded little.


“The key piece here is that they need to take credible steps to move toward concrete denuclearization,” she told reporters Monday.


North Korea’s call for “senior-level” talks between the Korean War foes signals a shift in policy in Pyongyang after months of acrimony.


Pyongyang ramped up the anti-American rhetoric early this year after its launch of a long-range rocket in December and a nuclear test in February drew tightened U.N. and U.S. sanctions. Posters went up across the North Korean capital calling on citizens to “wipe away the American imperialist aggressors,” slogans that hadn’t been seen on city streets in years.


The U.S. and ally South Korea countered the provocations and threats by stepping up annual springtime military exercises, which prompted North Korea to warn of a “nuclear war” on the Korean Peninsula.


But as tensions began subsiding in May and June, Pyongyang began making tentative, if unsuccessful, overtures to re-establish dialogue with Seoul and Washington.


Earlier this month, it proposed high-level talks with South Korea — the first in six years. But plans for two days of meetings last week in Seoul dramatically fell apart even before they began amid bickering over who would lead the two delegations.


Meanwhile, the virulent anti-American billboards plastered across the city were taken down. And on Sunday, as scores of people fanned out across Pyongyang to help carry out the latest urban renewal projects in the capital — landscaping and construction — the National Defense Commission issued a statement through state media proposing talks with the U.S. to ease tensions and discuss a peace treaty formally ending the Korean War.


One army officer, a director at the top military academy for North Korean youths, said he read about the proposal for talks in the newspaper.


“If they have talks and they go well, that’s good,” Jang Chun Hyon said Monday at the Mangyongdae Revolutionary School. “But we in the army will firmly hold onto our rifles and be ready to fight whether the talks are going smoothly or not.”


“Denuclearization can only be realized if the U.S. can guarantee that the whole peninsula is denuclearized,” he said, repeating what he read in the paper. “The hostile U.S. should forget their anti-republic policies.”


North Korea fought against U.S.-led United Nations and South Korean troops during the three-year Korean War in the early 1950s, and Pyongyang does not have diplomatic relations with either government. The Korean Peninsula remains divided by a heavily fortified border.


Reunifying the peninsula was a major goal of North Korea’s two late leaders, Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il, and is a legacy inherited by current leader Kim Jong Un. North Korea is expected to draw attention to Korea’s division in the weeks leading up to the 60th anniversary in July marking the close of the Korean conflict, which ended in an armistice. A peace treaty has never been signed formally ending the war.


Across Pyongyang, signboards at construction sites are marked with a countdown to July 27, giving laborers a deadline for retiling the roof of the People’s Palace of Culture, renovating the Korean War museum, and planting trees and grass meant to beautify the city for the milestone anniversary.


For the nation’s leaders, July 27 may well be their deadline for drawing the United States to the negotiating table to discuss a peace treaty.


But for Washington, there will be no talks just for talks’ sake, officials say.


Speaking on CBS television’s “Face the Nation” show Sunday, President Barack Obama’s chief of staff, Denis McDonough, said Washington has been “quite clear” that officials support dialogue and have engaged Pyongyang in talks in the past.


But “those talks have to be real. They have to be based on them living up to their obligations, to include on proliferation, on nuclear weapons, on smuggling and other things,” he said. “And so we’ll judge them by their actions, not by the nice words that we heard yesterday.”


He said smooth talk will not help Pyongyang evade U.N. sanctions supported by Moscow and Beijing, North Korea’s two traditional allies. U.N. Security Council resolutions ban North Korea from developing its nuclear and ballistic missile programs.


Earlier this year, Kim Jong Un enshrined the drive to build a nuclear arsenal, as well as expand the economy, in North Korea’s constitution. Pyongyang, estimated to have a handful of crude nuclear devices, says it needs to build atomic weapons to defend itself against what it sees as a U.S. nuclear threat in Korea and the region.


The National Defense Commission reiterated its refusal to give up its nuclear ambitions until the entire Korean Peninsula is free of nuclear weapons, a spokesman said in a statement carried by the Korean Central News Agency.


“The denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula does not only mean ‘dismantling the nuclear weapons of the North’” but also should involve “denuclearizing the whole peninsula, including South Korea, and aims at totally ending the U.S. nuclear threats” to North Korea, the spokesman said.


The U.S. denies having nuclear bombs in South Korea, saying they were removed in 1991. However, the U.S. military keeps nuclear submarines in the region and has deployed them for military exercises with South Korea.


After blaming Washington for raising tensions by imposing “gangster-like sanctions” on North Korea, the spokesman called on the U.S. to propose a venue and date for talks — but warned against setting preconditions.


Washington has been burned in the past by efforts to reach out to Pyongyang.


Months of behind-the-scenes negotiations yielded a significant food-for-disarmament deal in February 2012, but that was scuttled by a failed North Korean long-range rocket launch just weeks later.


___


Associated Press writers Youkyung Lee in Seoul, South Korea, and Matthew Pennington and Tom Strong in Washington, contributed to this report. Follow AP’s Korea bureau chief on Twitter at twitter.com/newsjean.


Associated Press




Top Headlines



North Korea changes tack and tells US: Let"s talk

Sunday, June 16, 2013

North Korea changes tack and tells US: Let"s talk








People walk past a roadside propaganda billboard promoting the “military first” policy and a boost to build the country’s economy in Pyongyang, North Korea, Sunday, June 16, 2013. North Korea’s top governing body on Sunday proposed high-level nuclear and security talks with the United States in an appeal sent just days after calling off talks with rival South Korea. (AP Photo/Alexander Yuan)





People walk past a roadside propaganda billboard promoting the “military first” policy and a boost to build the country’s economy in Pyongyang, North Korea, Sunday, June 16, 2013. North Korea’s top governing body on Sunday proposed high-level nuclear and security talks with the United States in an appeal sent just days after calling off talks with rival South Korea. (AP Photo/Alexander Yuan)





A woman rests under an umbrella while a man walks past her near a statue known as the Monument to the Three Charters for National Reunification, which symbolizes the hope for eventual reunification of the two Koreas, in Pyongyang, North Korea, Saturday, June 15, 2013. In past years, the monument built over the road leading to South Korea has been the site of celebrations marking a joint reconciliation declaration signed by the two Koreas on June 15, 2000. This year’s events were canceled after high-level talks between the Seoul and Pyongyang governments, the first in six years, were called off earlier in the week. (AP Photo/Alexander Yuan)





In this Friday June 14, 2013 photo, a music video about a song called “Reunification, June 15th” is shown on screens of an Air Koryo jet while on its way from Beijing to Pyongyang, North Korea. Korean on the screen read “Celebration for the June 15 joint-declaration.” Late North Korean leader Kim Jong Il and the late South Korean President Kim Dae Jung signed the June 15 declaration calling for the two Koreas to develop relations toward eventual reunification during a historic 2000 summit in Pyongyang. High-level talks between the Seoul and Pyongyang governments, the first in six years, were called off earlier in the week.(AP Photo/Alexander Yuan)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — After months of threatening to wage a nuclear war, North Korea did an about-face Sunday and issued a surprise proposal to the United States, its No. 1 enemy: Let’s talk.


But the invitation from North Korea’s National Defense Commission, the powerful governing body led by leader Kim Jong Un, comes with caveats: No preconditions and no demands that Pyongyang give up its prized nuclear assets unless Washington is willing to do the same — ground rules that make it hard for the Americans to accept.


Washington responded by saying that it is open to talks — but only if North Korea shows it will comply with U.N. Security Council resolutions and live up to its international obligations.


“As we have made clear, our desire is to have credible negotiations with the North Koreans, but those talks must involve North Korea living up to its obligations to the world, including compliance with U.N. Security Council resolutions, and ultimately result in denuclearization,” U.S. National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said in a statement. “We will judge North Korea by its actions, and not its words and look forward to seeing steps that show North Korea is ready to abide by its commitments and obligations.”


North Korea’s call for “senior-level” talks between the Korean War foes signals a shift in policy in Pyongyang after months of acrimony.


Pyongyang ramped up the anti-American rhetoric early this year after its launch of a long-range rocket in December and a nuclear test in February drew tightened U.N. and U.S. sanctions. Posters went up across the North Korean capital calling on citizens to “wipe away the American imperialist aggressors,” slogans that hadn’t been seen on city streets in years.


The U.S. and ally South Korea countered the provocations and threats by stepping up annual springtime military exercises, which prompted North Korea to warn of a “nuclear war” on the Korean Peninsula.


But as tensions began subsiding in May and June, Pyongyang began making tentative, if unsuccessful, overtures to re-establish dialogue with Seoul and Washington.


Earlier this month, it proposed high-level talks with South Korea — the first in six years. But plans for two days of meetings last week in Seoul dramatically fell apart even before they began amid bickering over who would lead the two delegations.


Meanwhile, the virulent anti-American billboards plastered across the city were taken down. And on Sunday, as scores of people fanned out across Pyongyang to help carry out the latest urban renewal projects in the capital — landscaping and construction — the National Defense Commission issued a statement through state media proposing talks with the U.S. to ease tensions and discuss a peace treaty formally ending the Korean War.


North Korea fought against U.S.-led United Nations and South Korean troops during the three-year Korean War in the early 1950s, and Pyongyang does not have diplomatic relations with either government. The Korean Peninsula remains divided by a heavily fortified border.


Reunifying the peninsula was a major goal of North Korea’s two late leaders, Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il, and is a legacy inherited by current leader Kim Jong Un. North Korea is expected to draw attention to Korea’s division in the weeks leading up to the 60th anniversary in July marking the close of the Korean conflict, which ended in an armistice. A peace treaty has never been signed formally ending the war.


Across Pyongyang, signboards at construction sites are marked with a countdown to July 27, giving laborers a deadline for retiling the roof of the People’s Palace of Culture, renovating the Korean War museum, and planting trees and grass meant to beautify the city for the milestone anniversary.


For the nation’s leaders, July 27 may well be their deadline for drawing the United States to the negotiating table to discuss a peace treaty.


But for Washington, there will be no talks just for talks’ sake, officials say.


Speaking on CBS television’s “Face the Nation” show Sunday, President Barack Obama’s chief of staff, Denis McDonough, said Washington has been “quite clear” that officials support dialogue and have engaged Pyongyang in talks in the past.


But “those talks have to be real. They have to be based on them living up to their obligations, to include on proliferation, on nuclear weapons, on smuggling and other things,” he said. “And so we’ll judge them by their actions, not by the nice words that we heard yesterday.”


He said smooth talk will not help Pyongyang evade U.N. sanctions supported by Moscow and Beijing, North Korea’s two traditional allies. U.N. Security Council resolutions ban North Korea from developing its nuclear and ballistic missile programs.


Earlier this year, Kim Jong Un enshrined the drive to build a nuclear arsenal, as well as expand the economy, in North Korea’s constitution. Pyongyang, estimated to have a handful of crude nuclear devices, says it needs to build atomic weapons to defend itself against what it sees as a U.S. nuclear threat in Korea and the region.


The National Defense Commission reiterated its refusal to give up its nuclear ambitions until the entire Korean Peninsula is free of nuclear weapons, a spokesman said in a statement carried by the Korean Central News Agency.


“The denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula does not only mean ‘dismantling the nuclear weapons of the North’” but also should involve “denuclearizing the whole peninsula, including South Korea, and aims at totally ending the U.S. nuclear threats” to North Korea, the spokesman said.


The U.S. denies having nuclear bombs in South Korea, saying they were removed in 1991. However, the U.S. military keeps nuclear submarines in the region and has deployed them for military exercises with South Korea.


After blaming Washington for raising tensions by imposing “gangster-like sanctions” on North Korea, the spokesman called on the U.S. to propose a venue and date for talks — but warned against setting preconditions.


Washington has been burned in the past by efforts to reach out to Pyongyang.


Months of behind-the-scenes negotiations yielded a significant food-for-disarmament deal in February 2012, but that was scuttled by a failed North Korean long-range rocket launch just weeks later.


___


Associated Press writers Youkyung Lee in Seoul, South Korea, and Tom Strong in Washington, contributed to this report. Follow AP’s Korea bureau chief on Twitter at twitter.com/newsjean.


Associated Press




Top Headlines



North Korea changes tack and tells US: Let"s talk