Showing posts with label dress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dress. Show all posts

Monday, September 16, 2013

Veil threat: UK Muslims outraged by possible ban on religious dress in public



Published time: September 16, 2013 14:37

AFP Photo / Leon Neal

AFP Photo / Leon Neal




The Muslim community in the UK has been ‘disgusted’ by the idea of a possible ban on Muslim girls and young women from wearing veils in public places. Home Office Minister Jeremy Browne says the government should consider the ban.


“We should be very cautious about imposing religious conformity on a society which has always valued freedom of expression,” a Liberal Democrat Minister told The Telegraph.


“But there is genuine debate about whether girls should feel a compulsion to wear a veil when society deems children to be unable to express personal choices about other areas like buying alcohol, smoking or getting married,” Browne said.


“That would apply to Christian minorities in the Middle East just as much as religious minorities here in Britain,” he added.


The chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, a group that works with young Muslims in the UK, said he was “disgusted” by Browne’s comments.

“This is another example of the double standards that are applied to Muslims in our country by some politicians,”
Mohammed Shafiq said.


“Whatever one’s religion they should be free to practice it according to their own choices and any attempt by the government to ban Muslim women will be strongly resisted by the Muslim community.”


The debate comes after Birmingham Metropolitan College changed its rules last week in an unprecedented move. It previously banned Muslim students from wearing niqabs – a veil that leaves only a slot for the eyes. An online petition against the ban was signed by 9,000 in 48 hours and forced the institution to drop the ban, which had been in place for eight years.


An 17-year-old girl who started the protest told the Birmingham Mail the veil ban was embarrasing.


“It upsets me that we are being discriminated against. I don’t think my niqab prevents me from studying or communicating with anyone – I’ve never had any problems in the city before,” the teenager, who didn’t want to be named, said.


Birmingham Metropolitan College is thought to be the only college in the UK to have banned the niqab, along with hoodies, hats and caps, so that individuals are “easily identifiable at all times”.


Reuters / Khaled Abdullah


“They haven’t provided us with another alternative. We said we would happily show the men at security our faces so they could check them against our IDs, but they won’t let us,” another student at the college, 17-year-old Imaani Ali, told the Mail.


Liberal Democratic leader Nick Clegg said he was also “uneasy” about the Birmingham ban.


“I’m really quite uneasy about anyone being told what they have to wear and I certainly would need to understand why,” Mr Clegg stated on his weekly LBC 97.3 radio phone-in show.


The guidelines from the Department for Education state that under the Equality Act 2010, schools must not discriminate against, harass or victimise pupils because of their: sex; race; disability; religion or belief.


“Where a school has good reason for restricting an individual’s freedoms, for example, to ensure effective teaching, the promotion of cohesion and good order in the school, the prevention of bullying, or genuine health and safety or security considerations, then the restriction of an individual’s rights to manifest their religion or belief may be justified.”


Back in 2007, a High Court judge rejected a pupil’s appeal to be allowed to wear the niqab in class. Currently in the UK, schools and colleges are given carte-blanche to set their own uniform policies. Headteachers in the UK can order students to remove veils for security reasons, however.


David Cameron’s spokesman said last week that the British Prime Minister would be in favor of banning controversial Muslim veils in his children’s schools. His nine-year-old daughter and seven-year-old son attend a Church of England junior school in West London.


“That would apply to every school, every single one, including the ones that his children may attend. What’s important is to back the right of schools to set their own uniform policy and that’s what the government will keep doing,” David Cameron’s spokesman replied.


The Conservative leader may be pushed to reconsider the rules on veils in schools.


“From a security point of view you need to be able to see the faces of people – in the House of Commons when we go through a division [to vote] we are not allowed to cover our face. There is a security issue here that is worth debating,” the Tory MP for Wellingborough, Peter Bone, told The Telegraph.


Sarah Wollaston, the MP for Totnes, has also suggested that the niqab should be banned in schools and colleges, saying the veils are “deeply offensive”.

“It would be a perverse distortion of freedom if we knowingly allowed the restriction of communication in the very schools and colleges which should be equipping girls with skills for the modern world. We must not abandon our cultural belief that women should fully and equally participate in society,”
she told the newspaper.


In another much-debated case, a judge on Monday allowed a 22-year-old London-based Muslim woman to stand trial in full face veil, but ruled she must remove it to give evidence.


The woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, earlier said it is against her religious beliefs to show her face in public, and her lawyer insisted that the refusal of permission to wear a veil would breach the young woman’s human rights.


Apart from the UK, a push for anti-Muslim laws has been recently made in France, home to Europe’s largest Muslim population. Last week leaders of France’s 6 million Muslims were outraged by the new ‘secularism charter’ designed to toughen rules banning religion from schools. Many Muslims fear that stricter laws at schools and universities would only deepen the gap between religions, and step up acts of racism and hatred against them.


In 2004, France passed a law banning schoolchildren from wearing conspicuous religious symbols, such as Muslim headscarves or Sikh turbans, but the law excluded universities. Now the High Council of Integration (HCI) wants to see the same rules applied to universities. In August, the research institute founded by the French government recommended prohibiting students from wearing religious symbols, such as Christian crucifixes, Jewish kippah skullcaps and Muslim headscarves.




RT – News



Veil threat: UK Muslims outraged by possible ban on religious dress in public

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Victoria’s Secret Model Karolina Kurkova’s Gun Dress Criticized


Karolina Kurkova

(Photo by Brian Flannery/Daily News)



Nowadays, it’s not really that hard to offend someone. So much as a display of something vaguely resembling whatever inanimate object you rally against is enough to prompt phone calls to the ACLU about how appalled you are.


Of course, as we gun guys can attest, firearms seem to take a lot of heat and prompt some pretty outrageous responses from those who think they know better.


Kid draws a picture of her father fighting monsters with a gun? Arrest the dad! Student bites his Pop-Tart so it looks like a gun? Suspend that little punk! That’ll teach him!


Sadly, it should come as no surprise that something with guns actually printed on is frowned on as “insensitive” and “low-taste.” At least, those are some of the words being used against Victoria’s Secret model Karolina Kurkova, who on Friday paraded around New York City in a dress covered in various handguns and rifles.


As is common with anything in this kindergarten country of ours, more than a few people had a problem with this.


The Hollywood-obsessed bloggers over at TMZ, for example, said Kurkova was “seemingly oblivious to the fact police had a deadly gun battle last night with the Boston Marathon bombing suspects” Thursday.


Maybe if TMZ actually did their homework, they’d know the dress has nothing to do with last week’s events in Boston, nor does it have anything to do with the attempts to ban “assault weapons” in Congress.


“It was against war and not anything to do with the personal use of guns,” Israeli-born designer Nili Lotan told the Daily News, saying it was actually a reference to the conflict between Lebanon and Israel.


Still, Lotan said she would be hesitant to use the same fabric again, given the tragic events in Boston and Newtown, Conn.


“Would I ever do (a gun print) again? I’m not so sure, because today it would provoke the wrong impression,” Lotan said, adding if she did use a gun print in the future, it would have “a very strong statement against allowing guns.”


Talk about ironic. Anti-gun fashionista makes anti-war dress, criticized for being insensitive because, oh dear, there are guns on it!


We at G&A won’t pretend to be fashion experts—by and large, our online staff’s wardrobes consist of flannel, tactical shirts and a few sports jerseys. This kind of nonsense is exactly why we stay far away from the world of fashion; it’s all confusion, self-righteousness and hypocrisy.


We’ll stick with our non-designer jeans and button-ups, thank you very much.




Guns & Ammo



Victoria’s Secret Model Karolina Kurkova’s Gun Dress Criticized

Saturday, April 27, 2013

Victoria’s Secret Model Karolina Kurkova’s Gun Dress Criticized


Karolina Kurkova

(Photo by Brian Flannery/Daily News)



Nowadays, it’s not really that hard to offend someone. So much as a display of something vaguely resembling whatever inanimate object you rally against is enough to prompt phone calls to the ACLU about how appalled you are.


Of course, as we gun guys can attest, firearms seem to take a lot of heat and prompt some pretty outrageous responses from those who think they know better.


Kid draws a picture of her father fighting monsters with a gun? Arrest the dad! Student bites his Pop-Tart so it looks like a gun? Suspend that little punk! That’ll teach him!


Sadly, it should come as no surprise that something with guns actually printed on is frowned on as “insensitive” and “low-taste.” At least, those are some of the words being used against Victoria’s Secret model Karolina Kurkova, who on Friday paraded around New York City in a dress covered in various handguns and rifles.


As is common with anything in this kindergarten country of ours, more than a few people had a problem with this.


The Hollywood-obsessed bloggers over at TMZ, for example, said Kurkova was “seemingly oblivious to the fact police had a deadly gun battle last night with the Boston Marathon bombing suspects” Thursday.


Maybe if TMZ actually did their homework, they’d know the dress has nothing to do with last week’s events in Boston, nor does it have anything to do with the attempts to ban “assault weapons” in Congress.


“It was against war and not anything to do with the personal use of guns,” Israeli-born designer Nili Lotan told the Daily News, saying it was actually a reference to the conflict between Lebanon and Israel.


Still, Lotan said she would be hesitant to use the same fabric again, given the tragic events in Boston and Newtown, Conn.


“Would I ever do (a gun print) again? I’m not so sure, because today it would provoke the wrong impression,” Lotan said, adding if she did use a gun print in the future, it would have “a very strong statement against allowing guns.”


Talk about ironic. Anti-gun fashionista makes anti-war dress, criticized for being insensitive because, oh dear, there are guns on it!


We at G&A won’t pretend to be fashion experts—by and large, our online staff’s wardrobes consist of flannel, tactical shirts and a few sports jerseys. This kind of nonsense is exactly why we stay far away from the world of fashion; it’s all confusion, self-righteousness and hypocrisy.


We’ll stick with our non-designer jeans and button-ups, thank you very much.




Guns & Ammo



Victoria’s Secret Model Karolina Kurkova’s Gun Dress Criticized

Thursday, February 28, 2013

VIDEO: Jennifer Lawrence Smolders in New Role!

Jennifer Lawrence is the “It Girl” right now, there’s no denying it. Her career is truly catching fire and her new Dior ads are no exception. Wait until you see the newly released behind the scenes video of Jen’s shoot. It’s probably gonna be tough for the designer to see purses considering we’re not even looking at the purses! Jen says that she loves the way the designer’s clothes feel on her when she wears them. Good thing she was wearing a Dior dress during that Oscar fall then!

Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.


To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.


VIDEO: Jennifer Lawrence Smolders in New Role!

Thursday, February 21, 2013

VIDEO: Hot Winter Fashion!

It is tough not to have a case of the Mondays in the dead of winter, but thankfully these ladies brightened things up with their sizzling style! Spring Breakers star Ashley Benson showed a pop of skin in her fab gown at the flick’s Paris premiere. Emmy Rossum heated things up in a white lace dress in Mexico City, while Olivia Munn rocked a “bird” dress at a Vanity Fair event. Hot, hot, hot! What’s your favorite way to stay stylish in the winter?

Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.


To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.


VIDEO: Hot Winter Fashion!