Showing posts with label Outraged. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Outraged. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Government seizes and destroys 160-year-old historical documents; genealogists and historians are outraged

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Government seizes and destroys 160-year-old historical documents; genealogists and historians are outraged

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Why People Should Be Outraged at Zimmerman"s "Not Guilty" Verdict



“George Zimmerman, the Florida ‘neighborhood watch’ volunteer armed with a gun, has been acquitted of charges of second-degree murder and manslaughter in the…
Video Rating: 4 / 5



Why People Should Be Outraged at Zimmerman"s "Not Guilty" Verdict

Monday, September 16, 2013

Veil threat: UK Muslims outraged by possible ban on religious dress in public



Published time: September 16, 2013 14:37

AFP Photo / Leon Neal

AFP Photo / Leon Neal




The Muslim community in the UK has been ‘disgusted’ by the idea of a possible ban on Muslim girls and young women from wearing veils in public places. Home Office Minister Jeremy Browne says the government should consider the ban.


“We should be very cautious about imposing religious conformity on a society which has always valued freedom of expression,” a Liberal Democrat Minister told The Telegraph.


“But there is genuine debate about whether girls should feel a compulsion to wear a veil when society deems children to be unable to express personal choices about other areas like buying alcohol, smoking or getting married,” Browne said.


“That would apply to Christian minorities in the Middle East just as much as religious minorities here in Britain,” he added.


The chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, a group that works with young Muslims in the UK, said he was “disgusted” by Browne’s comments.

“This is another example of the double standards that are applied to Muslims in our country by some politicians,”
Mohammed Shafiq said.


“Whatever one’s religion they should be free to practice it according to their own choices and any attempt by the government to ban Muslim women will be strongly resisted by the Muslim community.”


The debate comes after Birmingham Metropolitan College changed its rules last week in an unprecedented move. It previously banned Muslim students from wearing niqabs – a veil that leaves only a slot for the eyes. An online petition against the ban was signed by 9,000 in 48 hours and forced the institution to drop the ban, which had been in place for eight years.


An 17-year-old girl who started the protest told the Birmingham Mail the veil ban was embarrasing.


“It upsets me that we are being discriminated against. I don’t think my niqab prevents me from studying or communicating with anyone – I’ve never had any problems in the city before,” the teenager, who didn’t want to be named, said.


Birmingham Metropolitan College is thought to be the only college in the UK to have banned the niqab, along with hoodies, hats and caps, so that individuals are “easily identifiable at all times”.


Reuters / Khaled Abdullah


“They haven’t provided us with another alternative. We said we would happily show the men at security our faces so they could check them against our IDs, but they won’t let us,” another student at the college, 17-year-old Imaani Ali, told the Mail.


Liberal Democratic leader Nick Clegg said he was also “uneasy” about the Birmingham ban.


“I’m really quite uneasy about anyone being told what they have to wear and I certainly would need to understand why,” Mr Clegg stated on his weekly LBC 97.3 radio phone-in show.


The guidelines from the Department for Education state that under the Equality Act 2010, schools must not discriminate against, harass or victimise pupils because of their: sex; race; disability; religion or belief.


“Where a school has good reason for restricting an individual’s freedoms, for example, to ensure effective teaching, the promotion of cohesion and good order in the school, the prevention of bullying, or genuine health and safety or security considerations, then the restriction of an individual’s rights to manifest their religion or belief may be justified.”


Back in 2007, a High Court judge rejected a pupil’s appeal to be allowed to wear the niqab in class. Currently in the UK, schools and colleges are given carte-blanche to set their own uniform policies. Headteachers in the UK can order students to remove veils for security reasons, however.


David Cameron’s spokesman said last week that the British Prime Minister would be in favor of banning controversial Muslim veils in his children’s schools. His nine-year-old daughter and seven-year-old son attend a Church of England junior school in West London.


“That would apply to every school, every single one, including the ones that his children may attend. What’s important is to back the right of schools to set their own uniform policy and that’s what the government will keep doing,” David Cameron’s spokesman replied.


The Conservative leader may be pushed to reconsider the rules on veils in schools.


“From a security point of view you need to be able to see the faces of people – in the House of Commons when we go through a division [to vote] we are not allowed to cover our face. There is a security issue here that is worth debating,” the Tory MP for Wellingborough, Peter Bone, told The Telegraph.


Sarah Wollaston, the MP for Totnes, has also suggested that the niqab should be banned in schools and colleges, saying the veils are “deeply offensive”.

“It would be a perverse distortion of freedom if we knowingly allowed the restriction of communication in the very schools and colleges which should be equipping girls with skills for the modern world. We must not abandon our cultural belief that women should fully and equally participate in society,”
she told the newspaper.


In another much-debated case, a judge on Monday allowed a 22-year-old London-based Muslim woman to stand trial in full face veil, but ruled she must remove it to give evidence.


The woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, earlier said it is against her religious beliefs to show her face in public, and her lawyer insisted that the refusal of permission to wear a veil would breach the young woman’s human rights.


Apart from the UK, a push for anti-Muslim laws has been recently made in France, home to Europe’s largest Muslim population. Last week leaders of France’s 6 million Muslims were outraged by the new ‘secularism charter’ designed to toughen rules banning religion from schools. Many Muslims fear that stricter laws at schools and universities would only deepen the gap between religions, and step up acts of racism and hatred against them.


In 2004, France passed a law banning schoolchildren from wearing conspicuous religious symbols, such as Muslim headscarves or Sikh turbans, but the law excluded universities. Now the High Council of Integration (HCI) wants to see the same rules applied to universities. In August, the research institute founded by the French government recommended prohibiting students from wearing religious symbols, such as Christian crucifixes, Jewish kippah skullcaps and Muslim headscarves.




RT – News



Veil threat: UK Muslims outraged by possible ban on religious dress in public

Monday, August 12, 2013

Protest for Teen Killed By Taser – A Community Outraged By Cops (Israel Hernandez)




wearechange:   


I want to thank everyone in 2012 including the over 8 million viewers we had on this one youtube page that made our work possible. We had an incredible year and after everything that we experienced the bad the ugly the good and beautiful. One thing I learned is that with love, hard work and a positive attitude we can achieve anything.


Again thank you so much to everyone who donated to make this year possible.


Music: The agency of missing hearts http://freemusicarchive.org…
from et_ http://et-official.com/


Support us by subscribing here http://bit.ly/P05Kqb


http://facebook.com/lukewea…


http://www.youtube.com/user/wearechange?feature=watch



This entry was posted in Videos. Bookmark the permalink.

32





Protest for Teen Killed By Taser – A Community Outraged By Cops (Israel Hernandez)

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Coal Country Lawmakers Outraged Over Obama"s Energy Action

Coal country leaders are pushing back against President Barack Obama’s release of a climate action plan, which one lawmaker said would be “an unrecoverable blow” to the economy that could end a way of life for many hard-working miners.

Republican Rep. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia went on the attack after Obama adviser Daniel Schrag asserted that “a war on coal is exactly what’s needed,” the Charleston State Journal reported.


“President Obama failed to get his environmental agenda through Congress for a reason,” Capito said. “Despite common sense and the voice of Congress, it appears he will unilaterally forge ahead with his partisan agenda.


“By shutting down the production of coal, not only will the president make it impossible for America to become energy independent but he could deliver an unrecoverable blow to coal-rich states like West Virginia.”


Other West Virginia leaders also spoke out along with a coalition of attorneys general from  coal-producing states, noting the impact of overregulation on jobs and the economy if the coal industry is decimated amid the administration’s new energy goals.


“There is no sense in any extra-legal order by any president that will raise the price of electricity for every American. No one is served by not using the gifts and resources that God has blessed upon West Virginia,” West Virginia Republican Party Chairman Conrad Lucas said in a statement.


“It’s a time for choosing. We choose West Virginia coal. Obama chooses unemployment and higher electricity costs,” Lucas said.


Obama spoke Tuesday afternoon at Georgetown University on global warming and the need for a tougher energy policy to avert climate change problems.


Kentucky GOP Sen. Rand Paul also criticized Obama’s energy plan, saying he would fight back and stand up for miners in his coal-rich state.


“President Obama today declared a war on coal, and thus declared a war on Kentucky jobs and our economy,” said Paul. “Whether it is through the retroactive denial of permits, onerous regulations on coal-fired power plants, or unreasonable environmental requirements, the policies of this administration are threatening the very way of life that has sustained Kentucky communities for generations.”


“As a defender of the free market and of coal, I will continue to fight back against the EPA and any other federal agency whose goal is to stifle coal production. I will continue to stand up for our miners in Washington as we continue to recognize the sacrifices they make to provide food for their families and energy for America,” Paul added.


Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch was equally blunt in his condemnation of Obama’s energy agenda, calling it “unilateral” and damaging to economic growth.


“Let’s be clear about the consequences of what the president wants to do: higher energy costs passed on to consumers across Utah and the country, and fewer jobs at time when three-quarters of the American people are living paycheck to paycheck,” Hatch said in a statement.


“That he can’t get a national energy tax through Congress shows how unpopular his plan is,” Hatch said. “Just this morning it was reported that one of the president’s advisors is urging the President to wage a ‘war on coal.’”


Hatch said, “It’s simply baffling that President Obama is proceeding with this unilateral energy policy that will hurt Americans struggling to pay their bills and get a job.”


© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Coal Country Lawmakers Outraged Over Obama"s Energy Action

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

France Outraged at Car Bomb Attack on Embassy in Libya




by VOA News April 23, 2013


France is expressing outrage following an attack on its embassy in the Libyan capital.


The explosion early Tuesday at the French complex in the Hay Andalus area of Tripoli wounded two guards and caused extensive damage.


French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said the attack could have been worse if not for the quick action of security personnel. “There will be reinforcement in the whole area, not only in Libya but there will be security measures in the whole area. This attack was made to kill, France will not give in.,” he said.


​​Fabius also warned the attack was aimed not only at France but at “all the countries who are fighting against terrorist groups.”


European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton also condemned the attack, saying those responsible must be brought to justice.


The Libyan Foreign Ministry is calling the attack a “terrorist” incident.


Analyst Richard Cochrane with IHS Jane’s Information Group says the attack is worrisome because it shows just how fragile the situation is (audio of his full interview with VOA below).


“It really highlights the problems the Libyan government is having even in securing control of Tripoli, let alone the rest of the country, and exposes really how vulnerable foreign interests are to terrorists and this kind of terrorist attack,” he said.


Cochrane says another concern is the apparent degree of planning that went into Tuesday’s attack on the French embassy, which could indicate the involvement of more experienced militants.


Making matters more complicated, Cochrane says weapons are easy to come by in Libya.


“The population themselves are wary of giving up those weapons because they don’t yet trust the government to be acting in their best interest. It’s a very shaky post-revolutionary environment,” he said.


Libya has struggled with instability and violence since the ouster of long-time dictator Moammar Gadhafi in late 2011.


An attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi last September killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.







NEWSLETTER


Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list




GlobalSecurity.org



France Outraged at Car Bomb Attack on Embassy in Libya