Showing posts with label infections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label infections. Show all posts

Thursday, March 6, 2014

NYC Sees Rash of Rare Infections Tied to Seafood

NYC Sees Rash of Rare Infections Tied to Seafood
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif


(Newser) – Two things you never want to see linked: “outbreak” and “rare skin infection.” Unfortunately, that’s apparently the case in New York City, where some 30 people who bought seafood in Chinatown markets over the last six months have found themselves battling “Mycobacterium marinum.” The city’s Health Department made the announcement yesterday, and painted a picture of the bacteria and how it operates: It enters the body via open wounds (so wearing gloves at home while prepping dinner is apparently a good preventative measure, notes the DOH) and causes bumps to appear under the skin; that morphs into a wound that won’t heal.


Symptoms can take weeks to show, and while the infection can turn serious and even require surgery, it’s easily fixable with a course of antibiotics. A not-so-appetizing assurance from the DOH: Any seafood that may be behind the infection is safe to eat. The New York Times reports the outbreak came to light after a Chinatown hand surgeon last week contacted the health department after seeing 15 patients with the infection, compared to a previous tally of about one patient a year; he believes most were infected after puncturing their skin with a fish bone. The city’s deputy commissioner for disease control noted that the bacterium is most commonly seen in fish and aquariums, not humans.




Health from Newser




Read more about NYC Sees Rash of Rare Infections Tied to Seafood and other interesting subjects concerning Health and Lifestyle at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Common Test For Bladder Infections Misses Too Many Cases





Urine tests are the gold standard for diagnosing bladder infections. But one common test, the urine culture, can easily miss infections.



Ian Hooton/http://www.sciencesource.com/

Urine tests are the gold standard for diagnosing bladder infections. But one common test, the urine culture, can easily miss infections.



Urine tests are the gold standard for diagnosing bladder infections. But one common test, the urine culture, can easily miss infections.


Ian Hooton/http://www.sciencesource.com/



Most women know all too well the pain and discomfort of a urinary tract infection. They also know they’ll probably have to trek to the doctor for a urine analysis so they can get a prescription for antibiotics.


Surely there’s got to be a better way.


The first step for women with a history of urinary tract infections may be skipping a standard test isn’t that good at spotting bladder infections anyway.


“Fewer tests should be done,” says Dr. Michael Donnenberg, a professor of medicine at The University of Maryland School of Medicine who wasn’t involved in the study. “It’s even a poorer test than we thought.”


Urinary tract infections lead to 8 million doctor visits a year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That adds up to plenty of expense and inconvenience that in many cases may not be worth the trouble.


Doctors have two choices for urine tests: the dipstick test, which gives near-instant results and is useful for ruling out infection, and the urine culture. That is done in a lab and takes one to three days.


The urine culture, formally called a midstream urine culture, accurately identified most women who had bladder infections with E. coli bacteria, which cause at least three-quarters of infections, the study found.


But the test missed women who had infections with other bacteria, or had low levels of E. coli that were still enough to make the women sick.



Many labs ignore those low-level tests, says Dr. Thomas Hooten, a professor at the University of Miami School of Medicine who led the study.


If doctors are going to do urine cultures they should at least insist that labs look for low levels of E. coli, Hooten says. He told Shots that he would say: “Look guys, low colony counts of E. coli are meaningful, don’t discard those results.”


The results were just published in the New England Journal of Medicine.


The study involved 226 women, aged 18 to 49, and got samples both from the midstream test and by putting a catheter in the bladder.


When comparing those samples, something strange showed up, surprising the doctors.


About one-quarter of the women had no bacteria at all in the bladder, even though they had classic symptoms of infection. And quite a few of those women did have lots of bacteria in their midstream test.


“We would have assumed that the reason you had high numbers in the midstream culture is because they had high numbers in the bladder,” says Donnenberg, who wrote an editorial accompanying the study.


Maybe those women have an infection of the urethra rather than the bladder, Donnenberg told Shots, or maybe there’s something else going on that the doctors weren’t aware of. The doctors really don’t know.



“I don’t know if they’re benefiting from treatment because they really have bacterial urethritis, or if they’re being exposed unnecessarily to antibiotics,” Donnenberg says.


OK, this is all very interesting, but how is it going to help a woman who thinks she probably has a UTI? Like, uh, right now?


Unfortunately, doctors don’t have a more accurate test to replace the urine culture.


As a result, doctors have become increasingly comfortable with prescribing antibiotics without doing a urine culture, Donnenberg says, and this study supports doing that for healthy female patients. “If their physician doesn’t do cultures, that should not make them uneasy.”


Going for a urine culture is often a good idea the first time a woman has UTI symptoms, Donnenberg says, to make sure the symptoms aren’t caused by the sexually transmitted diseases chlamydia or gonorrhea instead.


“But once a woman knows it’s a UTI because she’s had a few, calling up the doctor and saying, ‘I have another one, can I have a prescription?’ is fine.”




News



Common Test For Bladder Infections Misses Too Many Cases

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Study: HPV infections in teen girls fall by half


Health care



45 minutes ago


hpv vaccine

NBC News


A new study shows that infections caused by the HPV human papillomavirus dropped by more than half in U.S. teens after the HPV vaccine was introduced in 2006.



Infections with the human papillomavirus tied to cervical cancer fell by more than half in U.S. teen girls after the HPV vaccine was introduced in 2006, despite high-profile controversy — and low rates of uptake, a new study shows.


Government health officials said Wednesday that the new data should encourage wider acceptance of the vaccine, which became a lighting rod for political controversy almost from the moment it was implemented.


Texas Gov. Rick Perry issued a 2007 executive order mandating that all sixth-grade girls be required to get HPV vaccinations, a move he later disavowed, and in 2011, Rep. Michele Bachmann ignited a firestorm by raising questions about the safety of the vaccine and whether it could cause “mental retardation.”


Even now, only about a third of U.S. teen girls ages 13 to 17 have had the full series of shots that prevent HPV infection, despite repeated studies that show the vaccine is safe and effective, said Dr. Tom Frieden, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Other countries, including places such as Rwanda, have higher HPV vaccination rates than the U.S., he added.


“The report should be a wake-up call to our nation to protect the next generation by increasing HPV vaccination rates,” said Frieden. “These are striking results because we can protect the next generation of adolescents and girls against cancer.”


Rates of HPV infection targeted by the vaccine fell from 11.5 percent in 2003 to 2006 to 5.1 percent from 2007 to 2010 in girls and women ages 14 to 19, a decline of 56 percent, according to new data published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases. The effectiveness of getting at least 1 shot in the three-dose series was 82 percent, the study concluded.


That proves that the HPV vaccine works well in that target group, Frieden added. If the U.S. had reached a rate of 80 percent vaccination, some 50,000 lifetime cases of cervical cancer could be prevented, Frieden said.


“For every year we delay in doing so, another 4,400 girls will develop cervical cancer in their lifetimes,” he added.


About 79 million Americans, most in their late teens and early 20s, are infected with HPV. Each year, about 14 million people become newly infected, the CDC says. About 56 million doses of HPV vaccine have been administered in the U.S. since 2006, Frieden noted.


About 19,000 cancers caused by HPV infections occur in women in the U.S. each year, according to the CDC, with cervical cancers being the most common. About 8,000 cancers caused by HPV occur each year in U.S. men; throat cancers are most common.


The new study, led by CDC medical epidemiologist Dr. Lauri Markowitz, used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, or NHANES, to compare prevalence of certain types of HPV infection in girls and women ages 14 to 59 before and after the 2006 launch of the HPV vaccine.


Results showed the vaccine actually worked better than expected to cut overall HPV rates in girls and women aged 14 to 19. There was no difference in other age groups over the time periods, the study found.


“The decline in vaccine-type prevalence is even better than we hoped for,” Frieden said.


That could be in part because girls and women who are sexually active sought out the vaccine more often, contributing to the lower prevalence, Markowitz said.


Two HPV vaccines, Cervarix and Gardasil, together target six types of the virus. Both vaccines are used to protect women against cervical cancer. Gardasil also protects against strains of HPV that cause genital warts and cancers of the anus, vagina and vulva. Only Gardasil is available for males.


Routine vaccination is recommended starting at age 11 or 12 for both boys and girls, but recent national immunization surveys show that only about half of all girls in the U.S. — and far fewer boys — have gotten even first dose of HPV vaccine, the CDC said.


Vaccination rates remain low in part because providers don’t recommend them strongly enough and because some parents are reluctant to administer them, Frieden said. Parents worry about the safety of the vaccine and about immunizing children who are not sexually active.


He noted that the vaccine must be administered early, before sexual activity starts, for best effect and that repeated studies have shown HPV vaccines are as safe as other vaccines recommended for that age group. Most common side effects are minor and include fainting, dizziness and redness and pain at the injection site. CDC has not been able to link serious adverse events or deaths to the HPV vaccine, said Dr. Cindy Weinbaum, a medical epidemiologist.


“I think we owe it to the next generation — our sisters, our daughters and our patients — to protect them against cancer,” Frieden said.


JoNel Aleccia is a health reporter at NBCNews.com. Reach her on Twitter at @JoNel Aleccia or send her an email.






Study: HPV infections in teen girls fall by half