Showing posts with label outcry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label outcry. Show all posts

Monday, January 27, 2014

Why There"s No Outcry

Why There"s No Outcry
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif


People ask me all the time why we don’t have a revolution in America, or at least a major wave of reform similar to that of the Progressive Era or the New Deal or the Great Society.


Middle incomes are sinking, the ranks of the poor are swelling, almost all the economic gains are going to the top, and big money is corrupting our democracy. So why isn’t there more of a ruckus?


The answer is complex, but three reasons stand out.


First, the working class is paralyzed with fear it will lose the jobs and wages it already has.


In past decades, the working class fomented reform. The labor movement led the charge for a minimum wage, 40-hour workweek, unemployment insurance, and Social Security.


No longer. Working people don’t dare. The share of working-age Americans holding jobs is now lower than at any time in the last three decades and 76 percent of them are living paycheck to paycheck.


No one has any job security. The last thing they want to do is make a fuss and risk losing the little they have.


Besides, their major means of organizing themselves — labor unions — have been decimated. Four decades ago more than a third of private-sector workers were unionized. Now, fewer than 7 percent belong to a union.


Second, students don’t dare rock the boat.


In years past, students were a major force for social change. They played an active role in the Civil Rights movement, the Free Speech movement, and against the Vietnam War.


But today’s students don’t want to make a ruckus. They’re laden with debt. Since 1999, student debt has increased more than 500 percent, yet the average starting salary for graduates has dropped 10 percent, adjusted for inflation. Student debts can’t be cancelled in bankruptcy. A default brings penalties and ruins a credit rating.


The job market for new graduates remains lousy. Which is why record numbers are still living at home.


Reformers and revolutionaries don’t have to live with mom and dad or fret about credit ratings and job recommendations.


Third and finally, the American public has become so cynical about government that many no longer think reform is possible.


When asked if they believe government will do the right thing most of the time, fewer than 20 percent of Americans agree. Fifty years ago, when that question was first asked on standard surveys, more than 75 percent agreed.


It’s hard to get people worked up to change the government or even to change a few laws when they don’t believe government can possibly work.


You’d have to believe in a giant conspiracy to think this was all the doing of the forces in our society most resistant to positive social change.


It’s possible. of course, that they intentionally cut jobs and wages so much as to cow average workers, buried students under so much debt they’d never protest again, and made most Americans so cynical about government they wouldn’t even try to for change. 


But it’s more likely they merely allowed all this to unfold, like a giant wet blanket over the outrage and indignation most Americans feel but don’t know how to express. 


Change is coming anyway. We cannot abide an ever-greater share of the nation’s income and wealth going to the top while median household incomes continue too drop, one out of five of our children living in dire poverty, and big money taking over our democracy.


At some point, working people, students, and the broad public will have had enough. They will reclaim our economy and our democracy. This has been the central lesson of American history.


Reform is less risky than revolution, but the longer we wait the more likely it will be the latter.




Robert Reich




Read more about Why There"s No Outcry and other interesting subjects concerning Opinion Columns at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Friday, January 3, 2014

General Mills to make GMO-free Cheerios after consumer, activist outcry


By End the Lie


(Image credit: mutantlog/Flickr)

(Image credit: mutantlog/Flickr)



After significant outcry from consumers and activist groups, General Mills has announced that they are now going to produce their famous Cheerios cereal free from genetically modified organisms (GMOs).


Read our latest articles: “Report: NSA developing quantum computer that could crack most encryption” and “Companies join forces to develop eye-tracking control system for video games


While the company says they never used genetically modified oats, they are now sourcing non-GMO pure cane sugar instead of beet sugar, according to spokesman Mike Siemienas, quoted by USA Today.


The company still maintains, however, that it has nothing to do with pressure from consumers or advocacy groups and nothing to do with safety.


Interestingly, the company said they have no plans to remove GMOs from their other cereals sold in the U.S., though most varieties of Cheerios sold in Europe are GMO-free.


“For our other (non-organic) cereals, the widespread use of GM seed in crops such as corn, soy, or beet sugar would make reliably moving to non-GM ingredients difficult, if not impossible,” the company said in a statement.


This move will also not affect anything except the original variety of Cheerios. That means that Honey Nut Cheerios, for instance, will still contain GMOs.


Even with the “Not Made With Genetically Modified Ingredients” label on the Cheerios box, General Mills notes that the product could still “contain trace amounts due to contamination in shipping or manufacturing,” the Wall Street Journal reports.


“Why change anything at all? It’s simple. We did it because we think consumers may embrace it,” wrote Tom Forsythe, vice president of Global Communications for General Mills, in a blog post.


Forsythe also pointed out in his post that the company stands by their position on GMOs.


“On safety – our number one priority – we find broad global consensus among food and safety regulatory bodies that approved GM ingredients are safe,” the company stated.


General Mills also contributed $ 1.1 million to fighting California’s Proposition 37, which would have put mandatory GMO labeling into law, as The Huffington Post points out.


While Cheerios will have the label pronouncing their lack of GM ingredients, other General Mills cereals will not have labels pointing out the presence of GMOs.


Inc.com points out that the move against GMOs appears to be gaining steam.


Grocery chain Whole Foods removed Chobani yogurt last month, reportedly because they want to make room for GMO-free products and/or clearly labeled products.


Connecticut also became the first state to pass a law requiring GMO labeling last month, though it won’t take effect until four other states pass labeling laws.


A high-profile GMO labeling law in Washington state was rejected in November, with 54.8 percent voting against the initiative.


Still, anti-GMO campaigners see this is as a major victory.


“Original Cheerios in its famous yellow box will now be non-GMO and this victory sends a message to all food companies that consumers are increasingly looking for non-GMO products and companies need to meet that demand,” said Todd Larsen, director of corporate responsibility for Green America.


We would love to hear your opinion, take a look at your story tips and even your original writing if you would like to get it published. Please email us at [email protected]


Please support alternative news and help us start paying contributors by donating, doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store.





End the Lie – Independent News



General Mills to make GMO-free Cheerios after consumer, activist outcry

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Peugeot chief renounces $29 million pension deal after outcry

Peugeot chief renounces $29 million pension deal after outcry
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/24e65__?m=02&d=20131127&t=2&i=815587255&w=460&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=CBRE9AQ1FUS00.jpg





PARIS Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:40pm EST



Philippe Varin, Chief Executive Officer of French carmaker PSA Peugeot Citroen, speaks to journalists at the Peugeot headquarters in Paris November 27, 2013. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier

Philippe Varin, Chief Executive Officer of French carmaker PSA Peugeot Citroen, speaks to journalists at the Peugeot headquarters in Paris November 27, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Benoit Tessier




PARIS (Reuters) – The outgoing chief executive of French carmaker PSA Peugeot Citroen (PEUP.PA) said he would forego his pension package after an outcry from government ministers and labor unions.


Peugeot has set aside 21 million euros ($ 28.5 million) for Philippe Varin’s pension deal. The company is cutting more than 10,000 jobs as it struggles to recover from a six-year European market slump.


“Given the immense respect I have for our staff and the consequences of the difficult but necessary decisions I had to take, I have decided to relinquish the present provisions of my pension package,” Varin told a news conference on Wednesday.


Varin acknowledged the “polemic and emotion” caused by his pension said the company’s supervisory board would decide on the new terms of his departure after consulting a corporate governance advisory body in the French employers’ organization.


The ministers and unions bristled at the fact that Varin, who will be stepping down three years before the end of his contract, would receive an annual 310,000 euro ($ 420,000) pension net of tax and social charges.


Peugeot announced this week that Varin would be replaced next year by former Renault (RENA.PA) No. 2 Carlos Tavares in a move that may help it secure new funding from Chinese partner Dongfeng.


Peugeot and Dongfeng are in talks to build on their existing Chinese joint venture with cooperation in other markets and a multi-billion-euro share issue that could see Dongfeng and France’s government acquire stakes in the French carmaker, sources familiar with the matter have said.


STATE GUARANTEES


The French government told Peugeot earlier on Wednesday to review the “inappropriate” pension award for Varin.


“Given PSA’s difficulties and given that the state has already underwritten (finance arm) Banque PSA Finance to the tune of 7 billion euros, we have asked for some very thorough explanations from PSA on the financial arrangements of his retirement,” Industry Minister Arnaud Montebourg said as he left a cabinet meeting.


In keeping with company practice, Varin will receive no severance payment when he leaves the group, unlike most of his counterparts at other major French companies.


Varin has received no bonus since 2011, a Peugeot spokesman said, and his pension arrangements are more modest than those at other French corporations.


The 21 million euros set aside in Peugeot’s 2012 accounts is designed to cover payouts of 310,000 annually over 25 years, the company spokesman said.


($ 1 = 0.7374 euros)


(Reporting by Gilles Guillaume and Laurence Frost; writing by Mark John and Geert De Clercq; editing by Tom Pfeiffer)






Reuters: Business News




Read more about Peugeot chief renounces $29 million pension deal after outcry and other interesting subjects concerning Business at TheDailyNewsReport.com