Showing posts with label rates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rates. Show all posts

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Health Insurance Rates Are Going Up Next Year, But It"s Nothing to Panic Over

The LA Times has a piece today about the next battleground for Obamacare: rate increases for 2015. The warnings are already coming thick and fast:


WellPoint Inc., parent of California’s leading health insurer in the exchange, Anthem Blue Cross, has already predicted “double-digit-plus” rate increases on Obamacare policies across much of the country.


…. Health insurers aren’t wasting any time sizing up what patients are costing them now and what that will mean for 2015 rates. Hunkered down in conference rooms, insurance actuaries are parsing prescriptions, doctor visits and hospital stays for clues about how expensive these new patients may be. By May, insurance companies must file next year’s rates with California’s state-run exchange so negotiations can begin.



I hope everyone manages to restrain their hysteria over this. Here in California, we’ve played this game annually for years. Health insurers in the individual market propose wild increases in their premiums—10 percent, 20 percent, sometimes even 30 percent—and then dial them back a bit after consumer outrage blankets the media and the Department of Insurance pushes back. But even then, we routinely end up with double-digit increases. Just for background, here are the average annual rate increases requested by a few of California’s biggest insurers over the last three years:


  • Anthem Blue Cross: 10.7%

  • Aetna: 12.1%

  • Blue Shield: 15.4%

  • HealthNet: 12.0%

And this doesn’t include changes in deductibles or out-of-pocket maximums. Add those in, and the annual proposed increases are probably in the range of 15-20 percent. Obamacare, of course, limits both those things, which means that in the future insurance companies will have to put everything into rate hikes instead of spreading the increases around to make them harder to add up.


Bottom line: if we end up seeing double-digit rate increases, it will be business as usual. Insurance companies will all blame it on Obamacare because that’s a convenient thing to do, but the truth is that we probably would have seen exactly the same thing even if Barack Obama had never been born. Let’s all keep our feet on the ground when the inevitable huge rate increase requests start flowing in.



MoJo Blogs and Articles | Mother Jones



Health Insurance Rates Are Going Up Next Year, But It"s Nothing to Panic Over

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

UPDATE 1-Australians learn to spend again as low rates lift spirits

UPDATE 1-Australians learn to spend again as low rates lift spirits
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif




Wed Jan 8, 2014 10:06pm EST



* Retail sales outpace forecasts for fourth month of solid gains


* Home building on track for much stronger year as low rates work


* Markets all but price out risk of further RBA easing


By Wayne Cole


SYDNEY, Jan 9 (Reuters) – Australians have rediscovered the urge to spend as retail sales and house building blew past expectations in November, just the warming mixture needed to help offset a cooling mining boom.


That is exactly the outcome the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) sought when it steadily cut interest rates to record lows last year and reinforces market expectations that the next move will be up, albeit not for some time yet.


“Sales momentum has picked up since August, and given the reasonably positive anecdotes, the odds are that sales finished 2013 on a firm note,” said Su-Lin Ong, a senior economist at RBC Capital Markets.


“The RBA will welcome the ongoing signs of policy traction and stay on the sidelines.”


Rates have been on hold at 2.5 percent since August and investors have priced out almost any chance of another easing this year. Indeed, futures markets show some are wagering that 2014 could end with rates on the rise.


Thursday’s figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics showed retail sales rose 0.7 percent in November to a seasonally adjusted A$ 22.5 billion ($ 20 billion), easily outpacing market forecasts of a 0.3 percent gain.


Importantly, it was also the fourth straight month of solid increases in spending after a fallow period earlier in the year and lifted annual growth in sales to 4.6 percent, the fastest pace in 17 months.


That is a big plus for economic growth since retail spending makes up almost a third of household consumption, which in turn accounts for 53 percent of the country’s A$ 1.5 trillion in annual gross domestic product (GDP).


Evidence suggests wallets have stayed open with the major retailers reporting a strong holiday shopping period. The Australian Retailers Association estimates A$ 42 billion was spent just in the lead up to Christmas.


Demand for new vehicles also ended the year on a high note with sales in December up 5.3 percent on the previous month, according to the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries.


“Anecdotally the Australia economy seems to have lifted a gear over December, which has continued early into the New Year,” said Savanth Sebastian, an economist at CommSec.


“Consumers certainly have more reason to be optimistic given, warmer weather, rising house prices and recent share market gains – all supporting a lift in sentiment.”


The ascent of home prices, which grew at an almost 10 percent pace over 2013, has in turn encouraged a much needed revival in home construction.


Approvals to build new houses jumped 6 percent in November, from the previous month, to be at the highest since mid-2010. For the year to November, approvals were up by a barnstorming 18 percent.


Include apartment buildings, and approvals for the year were up no less than 22 percent.


Home construction has an outsized impact on the economy given all the different trades involved and habit of buyers to pick up new furniture and electronics. The sector is also a big employer and contributes heavily to state tax revenues.


The ABS estimates that every A$ 1 spent on residential construction generates A$ 1.31 worth of spending elsewhere in the economy, while every million dollars spent creates 17 jobs.


As a result, a typical recovery in housing can add 2 percentage points or more to economic growth over a two to three year cycle.


“The residential construction upturn looks to be firmly entrenched, and will be one offset to lower levels of mining construction.” said Diana Mousina, an economist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia.


“The RBA will be pleased that prior cuts to interest rates are having a noticeable impact on the housing market.” (Reporting by Wayne Cole; Editing by Jacqueline Wong)






Reuters: Financial Services and Real Estate




Read more about UPDATE 1-Australians learn to spend again as low rates lift spirits and other interesting subjects concerning Real Estate at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Senior Gambling Addiction Rates Are Soaring in America, Driven by Corporate Greed and Bad Govt. Policy

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Senior Gambling Addiction Rates Are Soaring in America, Driven by Corporate Greed and Bad Govt. Policy

Sunday, December 22, 2013

Asia shares inch ahead, China money rates ease

Asia shares inch ahead, China money rates ease
http://www.reuters.com/resources_v2/images/btn_articleslide_previous.png





SYDNEY Sun Dec 22, 2013 9:33pm EST





Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange shortly after the market opening December 19, 2013. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson


1 of 5. Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange shortly after the market opening December 19, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson




SYDNEY (Reuters) – Asian stocks inched cautiously higher on Monday encouraged by record highs on Wall Street, though anxiety over a credit squeeze in China has weighed on shares there while adding to pressure on emerging market currencies.


There was some relief when China’s benchmark short-term money rate opened sharply lower at 5.57 percent, which was enough to help Shanghai edge up 0.15 percent .SSEC.


Volumes were very light with Tokyo on holiday on Monday and Christmas almost here. Australia’s main index .AXJO added 0.2 percent while S&P 500 futures gained 0.33 percent.


MSCI’s broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan .MIAPJ0000PUS firmed 0.5 percent.


Sentiment was underpinned by upbeat data on U.S. economic growth and the resilience of stocks to the Federal Reserve’s decision to start scaling back its bond-buying stimulus.


On Wall Street, the Dow Jones .DJI ended Friday up 0.26 percent, while the S&P 500 Index .SPX added 0.48 percent. Europe’s broad FTSEurofirst 300 index .FTEU3 rose 0.45 percent.


The dollar was idling at 104.02 yen on Monday after scoring a fresh 5-year high at 104.64 last week. Dealers cited option barriers at 104.75 and 105.00 as the next target for bulls.


The euro was a shade firmer at $ 1.3681, but well short of last week’s $ 1.3811 peak.


The single currency was only briefly troubled on Friday when Standard & Poor’s cut its supranational long-term rating on the European Union to AA-plus from AAA, citing rising tensions on budget negotiations.


Yields on benchmark 10-year Treasuries were holding at 2.89 percent having risen just 2 basis points last week even as the Fed announced its tapering.


In Asia, all eyes were on China after the country’s central bank sought to allay fears of a cash crunch on Friday, saying it has added $ 50 billion in three days to the interbank market.


Rapid credit growth in the world’s second-biggest economy has worried the Chinese authorities, who fear rising debt levels are fuelling asset bubbles.


The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) injected more than 300 billion yuan into the interbank market in response to rising rates, but hinted that banks have work to do if they want to avoid a cash crunch.


Worries about the banking system contributed to a 2 percent drop in Shanghai shares on Friday.


The combination of Fed tapering and tighter China interest rates could weigh on emerging market currencies and assets, as it did back in June.


Currencies from Indonesia to Malaysia and Thailand all came under pressure last week and even the Korean won lost a little of its strength.


Still, analysts at Deutsche argued that emerging markets (EM) Asia could weather any outflow of capital.


“Asia remains best placed — the reform effort in China and India is significant; and the smaller, more open economies will benefit disproportionately from strengthening demand in the U.S. and Europe,” said Drausio Giacomelli in a note to clients.


“The value of EM as a diversifier will increase once uncertainty about the future of U.S. monetary policy eases into 2014,” he added, noting that emerging markets were just a fraction of the global portfolio at around 3 percent or lower.


In commodity markets, gold has been getting less precious by the day due to the winding back of U.S. stimulus and a general lack of global inflationary pressure.


The metal was pinned at $ 1,202.44 on Monday after carving out a six-month low of $ 1,187.80 last week. If prices stay here the metal would have shed 28 percent this year, the largest annual loss in 32 years.


In contrast, oil prices have been supported by a positive outlook for fuel demand in the United States and reduced Libyan supply. Brent crude was up 7 cents on Monday at $ 111.84 a barrel, on top of gains of almost 3 percent last week.


U.S. oil futures were a single cent lower at $ 99.31. <O/R>


(Editing by Jacqueline Wong)






Reuters: Business News




Read more about Asia shares inch ahead, China money rates ease and other interesting subjects concerning Business at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

How Secret Currency Traders’ Club Devised Biggest Market’s Rates


It’s 20 minutes before 4 p.m. in London and currency traders’ screens are blinking red and green. Some dealers have as many as 50 chat rooms crowded onto four monitors arrayed in front of them like shields. Messages from salespeople and clients appear, get pushed up by new ones and vanish from view. Orders are barked through squawk boxes.


This is the closing “fix,” the thin slice of the day when foreign-exchange traders buy and sell billions of dollars of currency in the unregulated $ 5.3-trillion-a-day foreign-exchange market, the biggest in the world by volume, according to the Bank for International Settlements. Their trades help set the benchmark WM/Reuters rates used to value more than $ 3.6 trillion of index funds held by pension holders, savers and money managers around the world.


Now regulators from Bern to Washington are examining evidence first reported by Bloomberg News in June that a small group of senior traders at big banks had something else on their screens: details of each other’s client orders. Sharing that information may have helped dealers at firms, including JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM:US), Citigroup Inc. (C:US), UBS AG (UBSN) and Barclays Plc (BARC), manipulate prices to maximize their own profits, according to five people with knowledge of the probes.


“This is a market where there is no law and people have turned a blind eye,” said former Senator Ted Kaufman, a Delaware Democrat who sponsored legislation in 2010 to shrink the largest U.S. banks. “We’ve been talking about banks being too big to fail. What’s almost as big a problem is banks too big to manage.”


Read More…



BlackListedNews.com



How Secret Currency Traders’ Club Devised Biggest Market’s Rates

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

UPDATE 1-IMF sees Canada economy picking up in 2014, rates on hold

UPDATE 1-IMF sees Canada economy picking up in 2014, rates on hold
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/b5314__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif




Wed Nov 27, 2013 2:10pm EST



* IMF says economy should grow by 2.25 percent in 2014


* Sees interest rates rising in early 2015


* Projects inflation to reach 2 percent by end 2015


By Leah Schnurr


TORONTO, Nov 27 (Reuters) – Economic growth in Canada should accelerate next year as a pick-up in the U.S. recovery boosts exports, but low inflation means the Bank of Canada can wait to raise interest rates until early 2015, the International Monetary Fund said on Wednesday.


The IMF sees Canada’s economic growth accelerating to 2.25 percent in 2014 from an estimated 1.6 percent this year. While household consumption has remained robust this year, growth in exports and business investment has disappointed.


As demand and capacity utilization increase next year, business investment is expected to strengthen, particularly spending on machinery and equipment, the IMF said in a report.


“Twelve months ago we were expecting the economy to accelerate over 2013. I have to say, that hasn’t happened to the extent to which we were expecting,” Roberto Cardarelli, IMF mission chief to Canada, told reporters.


“The culprit is especially exports, which have not picked up as much as we were expecting last year, and business investment, which has slowed over the last few quarters.”


The Bank of Canada has also said it is looking for corporate investment and exports to contribute more to growth, picking up from highly indebted consumers who helped fuel the recovery from the financial crisis.


That rotation should happen next year, but hinges on a stronger U.S. recovery, said Cardarelli, who warned risks to the IMF’s growth scenario are predominantly on the downside. The United States is Canada’s largest trading partner.


Beyond lackluster demand for exports, obstacles hampering the sector include Canada’s strong currency, weak productivity growth and capacity constraints in the energy sector, Cardarelli said.


“That casts a little bit of a shadow, or a question mark, over the capacity for Canada to benefit from a recovery of the U.S. economy as much as it used to do in the past,” he said.


Another political standoff south of the border over fiscal policy and a faster-than-expected increase in long-term rates as the Federal Reserve looks to wind down its economic stimulus could also affect the U.S. recovery and demand for Canadian exports adversely, the IMF said.


With inflation muted, the Bank of Canada should keep monetary policy accommodative until there are firmer signs that a sustainable transition from household spending to exports and investment is taking hold, the multinational agency said.


It projected the Bank of Canada will lift its main policy rate in early 2015, with the inflation rate climbing back to 2 percent by the end of that year as existing slack in the economy is absorbed. The annual inflation rate dipped to 0.7 percent in October, below the Bank of Canada’s target range.


The Bank of Canada surprised markets in October by taking a more dovish stance on monetary policy after 18 months of saying rate hikes were on the horizon. The central bank has held its key interest rate at 1 percent since 2010.


HOMES LESS OVERVALUED


The IMF report warned elevated house prices and household debt could amplify the impact of external pressures, but sees the property sector as less overpriced than it was a year ago.


On a national basis, home prices are overvalued by 5 to 10 percent, down from last year’s range of 5 to 15 percent, Cardarelli said.


Canada’s post-crisis housing market boom, fueled by record low borrowing costs, has increased fears of a property bubble that could end in a U.S.-style crash. But the market has cooled since the federal government intervened last year to tighten mortgage rules.


“We think that the risk that people wake up in morning and say, ‘Oh my God, house prices are too high,’ … and everything falls and that the bubble is going to burst, we don’t believe that’s the case,” Cardarelli said.


“If the economy is going to struggle next year, then the risks around housing are much higher.”


The report said that over the long run, Canada should re-examine the need for the country’s extensive government-backed mortgage insurance program. Through its housing agency, the federal government insures billions of dollars worth of mortgages for homeowners with low downpayments.


While there are merits to the current system, the IMF said it exposes the federal budget to financial system risks and might distort the allocation of capital away from other uses, such as small business lending.






Reuters: Financial Services and Real Estate




Read more about UPDATE 1-IMF sees Canada economy picking up in 2014, rates on hold and other interesting subjects concerning Real Estate at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, August 17, 2013

What Is Going To Happen If Interest Rates Continue To Rise Rapidly?



image source

Michael Snyder
Activist Post


If you want to track how close we are to the next financial collapse, there is one number that you need to be watching above all others. The number that I am talking about is the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries, because it affects thousands of other interest rates in our financial system.  When the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries goes up, that is bad for the U.S. economy because it pushes long-term interest rates up.  When interest rates rise, it constricts the flow of credit, and a healthy flow of credit is absolutely essential to the debt-based system that we live in.  Just imagine someone squeezing a tube that has water flowing through it.


The higher interest rates go, the more economic activity will be squeezed.  If interest rates continue to rise rapidly, it will be more expensive for the U.S. government to borrow money, it will be more expensive for state and local governments to borrow money, the housing market may crash again, consumer debt will become more expensive, junk bond investors will be in for a world of hurt, the stock market will experience a tremendous amount of pain and there is a good chance that we could see the 441 trillion dollar interest rate derivatives bubble implode.  And that is just for starters.


So yes, we all need to be carefully watching the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries. On Friday, it opened at 2.76% and hit a high of 2.86% before closing at 2.83%.  The yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries is up nearly 120 basis points since the beginning of May, and almost everyone on Wall Street seems convinced that it is going to go much higher.


We are truly moving into unprecedented territory, because we have been in a bull market for U.S. Treasuries for the last 30 years.  Many investors don’t even know that it is possible to lose money on U.S. Treasuries.  They have been described as “risk-free” investments, but that is far from the truth.
In fact, we could see bond investors of all types end up losing trillions of dollars before it is all said and done.



And those in the stock market will lose lots of money too.  Low interest rates are good for economic activity which is good for the stock market. The chart posted below was created by Chartist Friend from Pittsburgh, and it shows that stock prices have generally risen as the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries has steadily declined over the past 30 years….



When interest rates rise, that is bad for economic activity and bad for stocks.  That is why so many stock analysts are alarmed that interest rates are going up so rapidly right now.


And as I wrote about the other day, we have just witnessed the largest cluster of Hindenburg Omens that we have seen since before the last financial crisis.  The stock market already seems ripe for a huge “adjustment”, and rising interest rates could give it a huge extra push in a negative direction.


By the time it is all said and done, stock market investors could end up losing trillions of dollars in the next stock market crash.


In addition, rising interest rates could easily precipitate another housing crash. As the Wall Street Journal discussed on Friday, as the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries goes up it will also cause mortgage rates to rise….

Higher yields will push up long-term borrowing cost for U.S. consumers and businesses. Mortgage rates will rise, and investors are keeping a close eye on whether this may derail the recovery of the housing market, which has shown signs of turning a corner this year.

In one of my previous articles, I included an example that shows just how powerful rising mortgage rates can be…

A year ago, the 30 year rate was sitting at 3.66 percent.  The monthly payment on a 30 year, $ 300,000 mortgage at that rate would be $ 1374.07.

If the 30 year rate rises to 8 percent, the monthly payment on a 30 year, $ 300,000 mortgage at that rate would be $ 2201.29.


Does 8 percent sound crazy to you?


It shouldn’t.  8 percent was considered to be normal back in the year 2000.


If you own a $ 300,000 house today, do you think it will be easier to sell it or harder to sell it if mortgage rates skyrocket?


Yes, of course it will be much harder.  In fact, there is a good chance that you will have to reduce your selling price significantly so that prospective buyers can afford the payments.


Let us hope that the yield on 10 year U.S. Treasuries levels off for a while.  If it says at this current level, the damage will probably not be too bad.


But if it crosses the 3 percent mark and keeps soaring, things could get messy pretty quickly.  In fact, according to a Bank of America Merrill Lynch investor survey, the 3.5 percent mark is when the collapse of the bond market is likely to become “disorderly”…

Our latest Credit Investor Survey, conducted July 8-11, showed that 3.5% on the 10-year is most commonly thought of as the trigger of a disorderly rotation – i.e. higher interest rates leading to outflows and wider credit spreads – among high grade investors.

Put differently, 3.0% on the 10-year will not lead to overall wider credit spreads if there is enough buying interest from institutional investors (though note that the 10s/30s spread curve would flatten further, as mutual fund/ETF holdings are concentrated in the belly of the curve, whereas institutional demand is disproportional in the long end of the curve). However, if the probability of a further move higher in interest rates to 3.5% is high – which will be the perception if interest rate volatility is high – certain institutional investors will choose to remain on the sidelines.


Thus there may not be enough institutional buying interest to mitigate retail fund outflows and contain overall high grade spread levels.


So what is causing this?


Well, there are a number of factors of course, but one very disturbing sign is that foreigners are selling off U.S. Treasuries at a pace that we have not seen since 2007…

One of the biggest fears in the financial markets is that foreign investors will stop buying U.S. Treasury securities, causing borrowing rates to surge.

Not that this is the beginning of a frightening trend, but new data from the Treasury Department shows that foreigners were net sellers in June. In fact, this is the largest net sale of U.S. securities since August 2007.


Do you remember all of the warnings that we have received over the years about what would take place when foreign countries started dumping U.S. debt?


Well, it looks like it may be starting to happen.


Unfortunately, there is no way that the party that the U.S. government has been throwing can continue without foreigners buying our debt.  We have added more than 11 trillion dollars to the national debt since the year 2000, and according to Boston University economist Laurence Kotlikoff we are facing unfunded liabilities in future years that are in excess of 200 trillion dollars.


Even with foreigners continuing to loan us gigantic mountains of super cheap money, it would still take a doubling of our taxes to put us on a fiscally sustainable course…

Writing in the September issue of Finance and Development, a journal of the International Monetary Fund, Prof. Kotlikoff says the IMF itself has quietly confirmed that the U.S. is in terrible fiscal trouble – far worse than the Washington-based lender of last resort has previously acknowledged. “The U.S. fiscal gap is huge,” the IMF asserted in a June report.  

“Closing the fiscal gap requires a permanent annual fiscal adjustment equal to about 14 per cent of U.S. GDP.”


This sum is equal to all current U.S. federal taxes combined. The consequences of the IMF’s fiscal fix, a doubling of federal taxes in perpetuity, would be appalling – and possibly worse than appalling.


Prof. Kotlikoff says: “The IMF is saying that, to close this fiscal gap [by taxation] would require an immediate and permanent doubling of our personal income taxes, our corporate taxes and all other federal taxes.


“America’s fiscal gap is enormous – so massive that closing it appears impossible without immediate and radical reforms to its health care, tax and Social Security systems – as well as military and other discretionary spending cuts.”


Can you afford to pay twice as much in taxes to the federal government?


Very few Americans could.


But that is how serious the financial problems of the federal government are.


And all of the above assumes that interest payments on U.S. government debt will remain at current levels.  If the average rate of interest on U.S. government debt rises to just 6 percent, the U.S. government will be paying out a trillion dollars a year just in interest on the national debt.


Also, all of the above assumes that we will have a healthy financial system that does not need to be bailed out again.


But if rapidly rising interest rates cause the 441 trillion dollar interest rate derivatives bubble to implode, the bailout that the “too big to fail” banks will need will likely be far, far larger than last time.


In fact, once that bubble bursts there probably will not be enough money in the entire world to fix it.


If the picture that I have painted above sounds bleak, that is because it is bleak.


Sometimes I get frustrated with myself because I don’t feel I am communicating the tremendous danger that we are facing accurately enough.


We are heading for the worst financial crisis in modern human history, and the debt-fueled prosperity that we are enjoying today is going to go away and it is never going to come back.


You can dismiss that as “doom and gloom” and stick your head in the sand if you want, but that isn’t going to help anything.  Instead of ignoring reality you should be working hard to prepare your family for what is coming and warning others that they should be getting prepared too.


When a hurricane is approaching landfall, you don’t take your family out for a picnic at the beach.  That would be foolish.  Unfortunately, way too many Americans are acting as if nothing like the financial crisis of 2008 could ever possibly happen again.


If you deceive yourself into thinking that all of this is going to have a happy ending somehow, you are going to get blindsided by the coming storm.


But if you make preparations now, you might just be okay.


There is hope in understanding what is happening and there is hope in getting prepared.


So watch the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries.  The higher it goes, the later in the game we are.


This article first appeared here at the Economic Collapse.  Michael Snyder is a writer, speaker and activist who writes and edits his own blogs The American Dream and Economic Collapse Blog. Follow him on Twitter here.

















BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


Activist Post



What Is Going To Happen If Interest Rates Continue To Rise Rapidly?

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Rates held until unemployment falls






























LIVE: Bank of England governor’s inflation report



Bank of England governor Mark Carney has said the Bank will not consider raising interest rates until the jobless rate has fallen to 7% or below.


Mr Carney said this would require the creation of about 750,000 jobs and could take three years.


The UK unemployment rate currently stands at 7.8%.


The unemployment threshold will hold unless inflation levels threaten to rise too fast or it poses a significant threat to financial stability.


Mr Carney said that until the threshold was reached the Bank would not cut back on its £375bn asset purchase programme, known as quantitative easing (QE).


While upbeat on the prospects for the UK economy, Mr Carney said it had not reached “escape velocity” yet.


“A renewed recovery is now underway in the United Kingdom and it appears to be broadening,” he said.


“While that is certainly welcome, the legacy of the financial crisis means that the recovery remains weak by historical standards and there is still a significant margin of spare capacity in the economy, this is most clearly evident in the high rate of unemployment.”


On the markets, shares rose and the pound fell immediately after the Bank’s statement was released, although the movements were quickly reversed.


There had been widespread expectation that Mr Carney would commit the Bank to the new strategy, known as “forward guidance”.


With short-term interest rates already at historic lows, the aim is to reduce longer-term interest rates.


Knowing interest rates could remain low, potentially for years, gives banks and mortgage lenders the ability to “lock-in” customers at lower rates for longer.




Powered By WizardRSS.com &
Pocket Chainsaw – a must have Survival tool, with many uses.

BBC News – Home

Rates held until unemployment falls

Closing Fannie, Freddie could boost mortgage rates







President Barack Obama speaks about housing, Tuesday, Aug. 6, 2013, in Phoenix. Obama was in Arizona to discuss the economy and the middle class and then to California to tape an appearance on “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno.”(AP Photo/Matt York)





President Barack Obama speaks about housing, Tuesday, Aug. 6, 2013, in Phoenix. Obama was in Arizona to discuss the economy and the middle class and then to California to tape an appearance on “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno.”(AP Photo/Matt York)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — Homebuyers could feel the pinch if Congress follows through on plans to shut down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-controlled mortgage guarantee giants that were rescued by a $ 187 billion taxpayer bailout during the financial crisis.


Borrowers would probably end up paying slightly higher mortgage rates under House and Senate bills that would phase out Fannie and Freddie over five years and shrink the government’s huge role in guaranteeing mortgage securities. Fannie and Freddie teetered under a crush of massive losses on risky mortgages before being bailed out.


The House Republican bill would virtually privatize the mortgage market. The Senate’s bipartisan plan envisions a continued but more limited government role in insuring mortgage securities. Supporters say that would keep mortgages available and affordable.


Congressional efforts to overhaul the nation’s mortgage finance system got a boost Tuesday from President Barack Obama’s call for changes that are generally in line with the Senate’s bipartisan plan.


“For too long these companies were allowed to make huge profits buying mortgages, knowing that if their bets went bad, taxpayers would be left holding the bag. It was ‘heads we win, tails you lose,’ and it was wrong,” Obama said. “The good news is right now there’s a bipartisan group of senators working to end Fannie and Freddie as we know them. And I support these kinds of reform efforts.”


The idea behind both plans is to shift more mortgage financing risk from the government to the private sector to prevent taxpayers from having to pay for future bailouts. But there’s a price homebuyers would likely pay for having private investors shoulder more risk to protect taxpayers.


“It will mean higher mortgage rates,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. “The question is how much higher.”


Typical borrowers could pay about $ 75 per month in extra interest payments, about half a percentage point, on an average mortgage under the Senate proposal, Zandi estimated, and about $ 135 more under the House plan. That’s on a conforming loan of about $ 200,000 with the borrower providing a 20 percent down payment.


“You have to assume that almost in any future model being drafted, loans will be more expensive,” said David Stevens, CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association and a former Obama administration housing official.


Most Democrats tend to favor a continued government role backstopping the mortgage market because they say it stabilizes the housing market. Many House Republicans, especially conservatives, want to end government involvement and let the free market rule. Given the split, the rival bills stand as opening markers in a long fight.


“We all agree that the system with Fannie and Freddie needs to be changed,” said Rep. Michael Capuano, D-Mass., ranking Democrat on the House Financial Services subcommittee on housing and insurance. “The real question is, do we reform it or kill it the way House Republicans want to.”


Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee, said the vast majority of housing industry groups such as real estate agents, mortgage bankers and homebuilders support keeping a government role insuring mortgage securities.


House Republicans, led by the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, say their bill to vastly reduce the government’s involvement in the mortgage finance system will be a boon to consumers, spurring competition and innovation in the private sector and giving borrowers more choices. They blame Fannie and Freddie for inflating the market before the housing crash, contributing to the boom-bust cycle.


Hensarling, in a statement Tuesday, said his plan “puts private capital at the center of the housing finance system, ends the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and sustains the 30-year fixed rate mortgage – all goals the president today says he supports.”


Hensarling’s bill recently cleared his committee without any Democratic votes and is expected to get a House vote in the next few months.


Housing advocates warn that if the government’s role is scaled back too far, mortgages could be pushed out of reach for people with lower credit scores and smaller savings for down payments.


They say 30-year fixed-rate mortgages, long a staple of the housing market, could become harder to find and more expensive for borrowers with modest incomes because lenders would be less willing to offer such longer-term loans without government guarantees.


“Those people are now going to be locked out of the system or many will end up paying a premium because of these changes,” said John Taylor, chief executive of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, a housing advocacy group.


Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee nearly half of all U.S. mortgages and 90 percent of new ones. They buy mortgages from lenders, package them as bonds, guarantee them against default and sell them to investors. That helps banks get rid of risk from their balance sheets, freeing up more money to lend.


During the financial crisis, as house prices tanked and foreclosures surged, the government rescued Fannie and Freddie from a flood of defaults on risky loans the agencies had guaranteed, many aimed at providing affordable housing for lower-income borrowers.


Like many banks, the two companies had relaxed their standards on loans they bought or guaranteed during the boom. High-interest loans, some with low “teaser” rates, were given to risky borrowers.


Now under government control, Fannie and Freddie are hugely profitable, and thanks in large part to the housing recovery they’re pumping billions of dollars into the U.S. Treasury. Fannie and Freddie have paid the Treasury $ 132 billion, more than two-thirds of the bailout.


In the Democratic-controlled Senate, a bipartisan bill by Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Mark Warner, D-Va., would gradually replace Fannie and Freddie over five years with a new agency having a more limited role insuring mortgage securities against catastrophic losses.


The bill would create a new Federal Mortgage Insurance Corp. that would provide backstop insurance available only after a substantial amount of private capital is used up. Investors would pay insurance fees to the corporation while agreeing to put a substantial amount of their own capital at risk.


The bill in the GOP-controlled House nearly eliminates the government’s role in the mortgage financing system. It would limit the Federal Housing Administration to insuring loans only for first-time and lower-income borrowers.


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



Closing Fannie, Freddie could boost mortgage rates

Thursday, August 1, 2013

Bill to lower student loan rates heads to Obama








Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., front right, with Reps. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., from left, Luke Messer, R-Ind., and Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., obscured, talk about student loans on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, July 31, 2013. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)





Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., front right, with Reps. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., from left, Luke Messer, R-Ind., and Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., obscured, talk about student loans on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, July 31, 2013. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)





Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., front right, with Reps. Luke Messer, R-Ind., from left, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., and John Kline, R-Minn., talk about student loans on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, July 31, 2013. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — A bipartisan bill that would lower the costs of borrowing for millions of students is awaiting President Barack Obama’s signature.


The House on Wednesday gave final congressional approval to legislation that links student loan interest rates to the financial markets. The bill would offer lower rates for most students now but higher rates down the line if the economy improves as expected.


For the moment, the focus was on the class of students signing loans for classes this fall.


“Going forward, the whims of Washington politicians won’t dictate student loan interest rates, meaning more certainty and more opportunities for students to take advantage of lower rates,” House Speaker John Boehner said.


The measure passed 392-31.


Undergraduates this fall would borrow at a 3.9 percent interest rate for subsidized and unsubsidized Stafford loans. Graduate students would have access to loans at 5.4 percent, and parents would borrow at 6.4 percent. The rates would be locked in for that year’s loan, but each year’s loan could be more expensive than the last. Rates would rise as the economy picks up and it becomes more expensive for the government to borrow money.


But for now, interest payments for tuition, housing and books would be less expensive under the House-passed bill.


“Changing the status quo is never easy, and returning student loan interest rates to the market is a longstanding goal Republicans have been working toward for years,” said Rep. John Kline, the Republican chairman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. “I applaud my colleagues on the other side of the aisle for finally recognizing this long-term, market-based proposal for what it is: a win for students and taxpayers.”


The House earlier this year passed legislation that is similar to what the Senate later passed. Both versions link interest rates to 10-year Treasury notes and remove Congress’ annual role in determining rates.


“Campaign promises and political posturing should not play a role in the setting of student loan interest rates,” said Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C. “Borrowers deserve better.”


Negotiators of the Senate compromise were mindful of the House-passed version, as well as the White House preference to shift responsibility for interest rates to the financial markets. The resulting bipartisan bill passed the Senate 81-18.


With changes made in the Senate — most notably a cap on how interest rates could climb and locking in interest rates for the life of each year’s loan — Democrats dropped their objections and joined Republicans in backing the bill.


Interest rates would not top 8.25 percent for undergraduates. Graduate students would not pay rates higher than 9.5 percent, and parents’ rates would top out at 10.5 percent. Using Congressional Budget Office estimates, rates would not reach those limits in the next 10 years.


Rates on new subsidized Stafford loans doubled to 6.8 percent July 1 because Congress could not agree on a way to keep them at 3.4 percent. Without congressional action, rates would have stayed at 6.8 percent — a reality most lawmakers called unacceptable.


The compromise that came together during the last month would be a good deal for all students through the 2015 academic year. After that, interest rates are expected to climb above where they were when students left campus in the spring, if congressional estimates prove correct.


The White House and its allies said the new loan structure would offer lower rates to 11 million borrowers right away and save the average undergraduate $ 1,500 in interest charges.


In all, some 18 million loans will be covered by the legislation, totaling about $ 106 billion this fall.


Lawmakers were already talking about changing the deal when they take up a rewrite of the Higher Education Act this fall. As a condition of his support, the chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, won a Government Accountability Office report on the costs of colleges. That document was expected to guide an overhaul of the deal just negotiated.


___


Follow Philip Elliott on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/philip_elliott


Associated Press




Top Headlines



Bill to lower student loan rates heads to Obama

Friday, July 19, 2013

Compromise would restore lower college loan rates







Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, chair of the Senate Education Committee, announces to reporters that a bipartisan agreement was reached on lowering rates for government student loans, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, July 18, 2013. At left is Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., with Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V., at right. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, chair of the Senate Education Committee, announces to reporters that a bipartisan agreement was reached on lowering rates for government student loans, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, July 18, 2013. At left is Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., with Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V., at right. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., a former secretary of education, center, speaks to reporters after a bipartisan agreement was reached on lowering rates for government student loans, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, July 18, 2013. Interest rates doubled July 1, 2013, because Congress didn’t avert a rate hike built into the law. Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, right, was one of the main negotiators. At far left is Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





Chart shows projected student loan rates based on a proposed Senate plan; 1c x 3 inches; 46.5 mm x 76 mm;





Prospective students tour Georgetown University’s campus in Washington, Wednesday, July 10, 2013. The defeat of a student loan bill in the Senate on Wednesday clears the way for fresh negotiations to restore lower rates, but lawmakers are racing the clock before millions of students return to campus next month to find borrowing terms twice as high as when school let out. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







WASHINGTON (AP) — A compromise deal on student loans that could hold down loan rates in the short term was expected to come to a vote next week, well before students returning to campus this fall have to sign their loan agreements.


While the deal could lower rates for students and parents over the next few years, it could spell higher rates as the economy improves.


The Senate deal pegs the interest rates on new loans to the financial markets. Under the deal, undergraduates this fall could borrow at a 3.9 percent interest rate. Graduate students would have access to loans at 5.4 percent, and parents would be able to borrow at 6.4 percent. Those rates would climb as the economy improves and it becomes more expensive for the government to borrow money.


The compromise undoes the doubling of rates on some student loans that took hold on July 1, and one analysis of the Senate deal suggests incoming freshmen would save more than $ 3,300 in interest.


“We have gone through weeks of negotiations and we have an agreement,” said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.


At the White House, spokesman Jay Carney said President Barack Obama was “glad to see that a compromise seems to be coming together.”


And Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., said students benefited: “For every one of them, the interest rates on their loans will be lower.”


At least for now. The compromise could be a good deal for students through the 2015 academic year, but then interest rates are expected to climb above where they were when students left campus in the spring.


Even in announcing the compromise, it was clear the negotiations were dicey.


“While this is not the agreement any of us would have written, and many of us would like to have seen something quite different, I believe that we have come a very long way on reaching common ground,” Durbin told reporters.


Moments later, Democratic Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa, chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, said he would revisit the whole agreement this fall, when his panel takes up a rewrite of the Higher Education Act. Harkin did little to hide his unhappiness with the compromise, but said there were few options to avoid a costly hike on students returning to campus this fall.


As part of the compromise, Democrats won a protection for students that capped rates at a maximum 8.25 percent for undergraduates. Graduate students would not pay rates higher than 9.5 percent, and parents’ rates would top out at 10.5 percent.


Using Congressional Budget Office estimates, rates would not reach those limits in the next 10 years.


Lawmakers engaged in near-constant work to undo a rate hike that took hold for subsidized Stafford loans on July 1. Rates for new subsidized Stafford loans doubled from 3.4 percent to 6.8 percent.


On Wednesday, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau estimated outstanding student debt at $ 1.2 trillion — up 20 percent in just two years. Student loans are now the largest form of consumer debt behind mortgages.


The Congressional Budget Office estimates 21 million loans would be issued in 2013. Students often take a combination of subsidized and unsubsidized loans to pay for their education.


The rapid growth in debt is raising alarm among experts, and there is growing evidence student debt is weighing down the economy — for instance, by delaying the ability of young graduates to buy homes.


The increase follows the jump in the cost of higher education.


The tuition sticker price at public four-year colleges is up 27 percent beyond overall inflation over the last five years, according to the latest figures from the College Board. This past year it rose nearly 5 percent to an annual average of $ 8,655 nationwide.


Only about one-third of full-time students pay that published price, and the average net price — what the average student does pay after grants, scholarships, loans and federal tax credits and deductions — is just $ 2,910 for a year of studies. But net prices have been rising, too, and tuition is just part of the cost of college. Including room and board, the average annual sticker price at public colleges is now $ 17,860, and students pay on average $ 12,110.


At private four-year colleges, the annual average full tuition price is now just under $ 40,000, with the average student paying $ 23,840.


The bipartisan student loan compromise closely hews to what House Republicans passed earlier this year. Both Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and Republican House Speaker John Boehner suggested the outlines of the proposal were acceptable to the GOP rank-and-file members who have pushed for a link between interest rates and the financial markets.


Even House Democrats who opposed the GOP-led deal there appeared ready to go along.


“I’m encouraged that bipartisan efforts continue in the Senate to reverse the student loan interest rate hike,” said Rep. George Miller, the top Democrat on the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.


Few students had borrowed for fall classes. Students typically do not sign loans until just before they return to campus, and lawmakers have until the August recess to restore the lower rates. The students who had borrowed for summer programs since July 1 would have their rates retroactively reduced.


The deal was estimated to reduce the deficit by $ 715 million over the next decade.


___


Associated Press Higher Education Writer Justin Pope in Ann Arbor, Mich., contributed to this report.


___


Follow Philip Elliott on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/philip_elliott


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



Compromise would restore lower college loan rates

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Senators ready to restore lower college loan rates







The U.S. Capitol is seen in Washington, Sunday night, June 23, 2013. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





The U.S. Capitol is seen in Washington, Sunday night, June 23, 2013. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — Senators are ready to offer students a better deal on their college loans this fall, but future classes could see higher interest rates.


The Senate could vote as early as Thursday on a bipartisan compromise that heads off a costly increase for returning students. The compromise could be a good deal for students through the 2015 academic year, but then interest rates are expected to climb above where they were when students left campus this spring.


Under the deal, all undergraduates this fall would borrow at 3.85 percent interest rates. Graduate students would have access to loans at 5.4 percent and parents would be able to borrow at 6.4 percent. Those rates would climb as the economy improves and it becomes more expensive for the government to borrow money.


The deal was described by Republican and Democratic aides who insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the ongoing negotiations by name.


Undergraduates last year borrowed at 3.4 percent or 6.8 percent, depending on their financial need. Graduate students had access to federal loans at 6.8 percent and parents borrowed at 7.9 percent.


The interest rates would be linked to the financial markets, but Democrats won a protection for students that rates would never climb higher than 8.25 percent for undergraduates. Graduate students would not pay rates higher than 9.5 percent and parents’ rates would top out at 10.5 percent.


The bipartisan agreement is expected to be the final in a string of efforts that have emerged from near constant work to undo a rate hike that took hold for subsidized Stafford loans on July 1. Rates for new subsidized Stafford loans doubled from 3.4 percent to 6.8 percent, adding roughly $ 2,600 to students’ education costs.


Lawmakers from both parties called the increase senseless but differed on how to restore the lower rates. Republicans have pushed for a link between interest rates and the financial markets. Obama included that link in his budget proposal, as did House Republicans. Democrats balked, saying it could produce government profits on the backs of borrowers if rates continued to climb.


Leaders from both parties, however, recognized the potential to be blamed for the added costs in the 2014 elections if nothing were done.


Senate aides said a vote on the agreement could come as early as Thursday, although it could be pushed back to the middle of next week.


The House has already passed student loan legislation that also links interest rates to the 10-year Treasury note. The differences between the Senate and House versions are expected to be resolved before students return to campus this fall, and Obama is expected to sign the bill.


Few students had borrowed for fall classes. Students typically do not take out loans until just before they return to campus, and lawmakers have until the August recess to restore the lower rates. The students who had borrowed for summer programs since July 1 would have their rates retroactively reduced.


The deal was estimated to reduce the deficit by $ 715 million over the next decade.


Lawmakers and their top aides have been tinkering with various proposals — nudging here, trimming there — trying to find a deal that avoids added red ink for students and the government alike.


Democrats and Republicans met with Obama and Vice President Joe Biden on Tuesday at the White House. An outline of an agreement seemed to be taking shape Tuesday, with follow-up meetings Wednesday in Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin’s office yielding a final agreement.


Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republican Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina were the main negotiators, with Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Durbin filling the role of mediators.


___


Follow Philip Elliott on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/philip_elliott


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



Senators ready to restore lower college loan rates