Showing posts with label Until. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Until. Show all posts

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Russia-Ukraine Agree “Truce” Until March 21st; White House Warns Putin Stop Playing “Russian Roulette”


Embedded image permalinkZero Hedge – by Tyler Durden


“President Putin has started a game of Russian roulette and I think the United States and the West have to be very clear in their response,” states Sen. Foreign Relations Committed Chair Robert Menendez among a slew of Sunday morning talk-show rhetoric from US politicians with the White House’s Dan Pfeiffer adding “President Putin has a choice about what he’s going to do here. Is he going to continue to further isolate himself, further hurt his economy, further diminish Russian influence in the world, or is he going to do the right thing?” As the “sham referendum” continues, Reuters, however, reports that Ukraine’s acting defense minister believes Russia and Ukraine have agree a truce until March 21st.  


Sunday Morning Talk-Show Rhetoric… (via AP)


If Russian President Vladimir Putin doesn’t back down in Crimea, he will face penalties from the West that will hurt the Russian economy and diminish Moscow’s influence in the world, the White House said Sunday.


White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said the Obama administration’s top priority is supporting the new Ukrainian government “in every way possible.” He also said the United States would not recognize the results of a referendum taking place in Crimea Sunday on whether it should become part of Russia.


Pfeiffer said everything that Russia has done in Crimea has been a violation of international law and bad for stability in the region.


“President Putin has a choice about what he’s going to do here. Is he going to continue to further isolate himself, further hurt his economy, further diminish Russian influence in the world, or is he going to do the right thing?” Pfeiffer said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”


…


“President Putin has started a game of Russian roulette and I think the United States and the West have to be very clear in their response because he will calculate about how far he can go,” said Sen. Robert Menendez, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.


Menendez appeared on Fox News Sunday along with the ranking Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee. Corker said the U.S. and Europe were entering a “defining moment” in their relationship with Russia.


“Putin will continue to do this. He did it in Georgia a few years ago. He’s moved into Crimea and he will move into other places unless we show that long-term resolve.”


Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut returned early Sunday from meetings in Ukraine.He called an annexation vote taking place in Crimea a “sham referendum.” He said that Ukrainians he talked to, both inside the government and outside, said war could occur if Russia attempts to annex more territory. They indicated that “If Russia really does decide to move beyond Crimea it’s going to be bloody and the fight may be long,” he said on ABC’s “This Week.”



But it appears truce has been reached for now…


The defense ministries of Ukraine and Russia have agreed on a truce in Crimea until March 21, Ukraine’s acting defense minister said on Sunday.


“An agreement has been reached with (Russia’s) Black Sea Fleet and the Russian Defense Ministry on a truce in Crimea until March 21,” Ihor Tenyukh told journalists on the sidelines of a cabinet meeting.


“No measures will be taken against our military facilities in Crimea during that time. Our military sites are therefore proceeding with a replenishment of reserves.“



As Ukrainian armed forces appear resigned to the loss:


No confirmation as yet from the Russian authorities… which, it would appear, merely gives Putin more time to arrange his military pieces since for sure he shows no signs of backing down… as the tanks keep rolling


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-16/russia-ukraine-agree-truce-until-march-21st-white-house-warns-putin-stop-playing-rus






Russia-Ukraine Agree “Truce” Until March 21st; White House Warns Putin Stop Playing “Russian Roulette”

Crimea Votes Overwhelmingly to Rejoin Russia; Truce Until March 21; Goodbye Hryvnia, Hello Ruble; McCain Wants Military Aid for Ukraine

Crimea returns to Russia It’s a done deal. Nothing can be done about it. An Exit poll shows Crimeans Choose to Join Russia in Vote

A majority of Crimeans chose to join Russia in a disputed referendum, exit polls showed, deepening the worst crisis between Russia and the West since the end of the Cold War.

A total of 93 percent voted today in favor of leaving Ukraine to become part of Russia, the Republican Institute of Social and Political Studies said, citing exit polls from the vote in the Black Sea peninsula. The Ukrainian government, the European Union and the U.S. all consider the referendum illegal. About 1.5 million Crimean voters were eligible to take part, according to the region’s prime minister.


Goodbye Hryvnia, Hello Ruble


Crimea will switch to the Russian ruble and abandon Ukraine’s hryvnia on April 1, RIA Novosti cited Crimean Deputy Prime Minister Rustam Temirgaliev as saying today.


McCain Wants Military Aid for Ukraine


The US senate’s head-warmonger, John McCain said Obama is giving “serious consideration” to sending military aid to Ukraine. Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy, in an ABC interview, said the U.S. should pass “crippling sanctions” on Russia and help Ukraine rebuild its armed forces.


Biden Promote US as World’s Policeman


U.S. Vice President Joe Biden will travel to NATO members Poland and Lithuania tomorrow for talks on Ukraine, according to a White House statement. The Pentagon said last week it would send 12 F-16 aircraft to Poland as a sign of U.S. commitment to defend allies in the region; the U.S. previously sent six fighter jets to Lithuania.


Do US citizens support wasting tax dollars sending Aircraft to Poland? Of course not. Does McCain or the Republicans care about balancing the budget? Of course not?


Did Obama take down Guantanamo Bay, get all US troops out of Afghanistan or Iraq? Of course not.


In case you missed it, please see President Obama is the Biggest Fraud Ever Perpetrated on US Citizens (Fantastic Carey Wedler Video)


Support for war, spying, and for the US to waste money being the world’s policeman is rampant in Congress, deficits be damned. But hey, don’t worry Ukraine and Russia Agree to a 5-Day Truce.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis



Crimea Votes Overwhelmingly to Rejoin Russia; Truce Until March 21; Goodbye Hryvnia, Hello Ruble; McCain Wants Military Aid for Ukraine

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

CRP on Break Until Jan. 2


If you’re a reporter on deadline, please email us as usual at press@crp.org. We will be checking sporadically. If you don’t get a quick response, try calling Viveca Novak at 202-253-9629.



OpenSecrets Blog



CRP on Break Until Jan. 2

Thursday, December 26, 2013

China won"t become the world’s largest economy until 2028

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



China won"t become the world’s largest economy until 2028

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

[282] No Place for Nuclear Waste, Afghanistan War Until 2024, Honduras Political Assassinations

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


[282] No Place for Nuclear Waste, Afghanistan War Until 2024, Honduras Political Assassinations

Saturday, December 7, 2013

Nelson Mandela Was Considered A Terrorist Until 2008


Kristin Tate is a writer and commentator. She was trained in journalism by John Stossel at the Fox Business Network. Dedicated to fearless reporting, Tate regularly works on undercover stings with journalist James O’Keefe to reveal government waste, abuse, and fraud. Tate was a Young Americans for Liberty (YAL) Chapter President and Founder in Boston. She will continue to fight tirelessly for individual liberty and free markets through reporting and new media. Follow Kristin on Twitter @KristinBTate.




Ben Swann Truth In Media



Nelson Mandela Was Considered A Terrorist Until 2008

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

US troops could stay in Afghanistan until 2024

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



US troops could stay in Afghanistan until 2024

Monday, November 18, 2013

Fed"s message of no rate hike until 2015 is sinking in: study

Fed"s message of no rate hike until 2015 is sinking in: study
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/f21a6__?m=02&d=20131118&t=2&i=812923077&w=460&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=CBRE9AH1E3J00.jpg





SAN FRANCISCO Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:02pm EST



A general view of the U.S. Federal Reserve building as the morning sky breaks over Washington, July 31, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

A general view of the U.S. Federal Reserve building as the morning sky breaks over Washington, July 31, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst




SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – The Federal Reserve has effectively communicated its commitment to ultra-easy policy, so that economists and traders correctly understand that interest rates will likely stay near zero until “sometime in 2015,” according to a Fed study published on Monday.


The paper, published in the latest Economic Letter from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, looks in detail at data through late May. At that time, the researchers said, investors and economists expected a first Fed rate hike around mid-2015, based on economist surveys and Treasury yields interpreted in light of near-zero rates.


Although the paper does not explicitly say so, the decline in market rates since May — when Fed Chairman Bernanke offered a timeline for the end of the Fed’s massive bond-buying program that now sees too aggressive — suggests that traders may now see the Fed’s first rate hike as coming even later.


Convincing the public that the U.S. central bank will keep rates low for a long time is a key pillar of the Fed’s super-easy monetary policy, which seeks to stoke investment and hiring by keeping borrowing costs down.


Economist surveys and U.S. Treasury yields both show that most are buying the idea that low rates are here to stay for quite a while, the paper said.


“Our estimates suggest that the (Fed)’s forward guidance has been effective in pushing out the expected liftoff horizon, which has contributed to lower interest rates, easing financial conditions and adding stimulus to the economy,” wrote San Francisco Fed economist Michael Bauer and the bank’s research director Glenn Rudebusch.


“Recent estimates of policy liftoff generally suggest the first funds rate hike will occur sometime in 2015.”


The authors cautioned that reading expected future rate rises in the Treasury yield curve requires more finesse than simply looking at the first point on the graph where Treasury yields suggest rates could rise.


Reading the yield curve in such a simple way “will generally underestimate the time until liftoff” based on the Fed’s own forecasts and those of economists, the authors said, because near-zero short-term rates distort the curve as a reading of the most likely timing of a rate hike.


A case in point: In May 2013, a simple reading of the yield curve would have suggested the first Fed rate hike as coming in September 2014 — more than six months earlier than could be concluded using the authors’ own model of interpreting forward rates.


“Interpreted correctly, both the survey and market measures of policy liftoff appear generally consistent with the (Fed)’s formal guidance,” they wrote.


The Fed does not in its formal statement provide a date for when it expects to begin to raise rates. It does publish forecasts from Fed policymakers, the majority of whom see rates first rising in 2015.


Exactly when in 2015 is still an open question. And on that score, the San Francisco Fed researchers are silent.


(Reporting by Ann Saphir; Editing by Leslie Adler)






Reuters: Business News




Read more about Fed"s message of no rate hike until 2015 is sinking in: study and other interesting subjects concerning Business at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Friday, November 15, 2013

Ezra Klein: WH Trying To Buy Time Until People Realize Obamacare Offers Better Insurance





LAWRENCE O’DONNELL: What you heard from today from the White House about how the president hopes to fix this situation. What’s your reading of how that will work?


EZRA KLEIN: It isn’t a fix. And part it’s not a fix because the situation actually isn’t that broken. What’s broken is another part of the law. So, what he said today, the new policy he’s got coming out, you’re basically dealing with an optional opportunity for insurers to keep putting forward plans that are not going to be profitable for them any longer. And the president really rolled over on insurance today and then fundamentally they are responding to a new set of rules that the Affordable Care Act brings out.


The idea that it’s kind of up to them now, I don’t think is actually all that accurate. I mean, some of them will take the opportunity to extended the plan for an extra year, but for a lot of them it’s not going all that profitable to do so because they simply would have to send out the cancelation notices a year later. They would have to reconstruct infrastructure around the plans in the meantime.


The problem, ultimately, is that the fundamental machinery of the law, mainly Healthcare.gov and the digital architecture it stands atop, is that it is still not working. It is that fundamental problem where people having their plans being canceled, if they can see, often times that they could get better insurance, they can’t see that now. I think fundamentally the White House is trying to buy time until those people can see that.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Ezra Klein: WH Trying To Buy Time Until People Realize Obamacare Offers Better Insurance

Friday, November 8, 2013

Agent feared FBI was stalling Petraeus investigation until after 2012 election


Reed Saxon / AP, file



David H. Petraeus, former army general and head of the Central Intelligence Agency, speaks at the annual dinner for veterans and ROTC students at the University of Southern California, in downtown Los Angeles Tuesday, March 26, 2013.




By Michael Isikoff, National Investigative Correspondent, NBC News


A veteran FBI counterterrorism agent repeatedly raised concerns last year that senior bureau officials were stalling an investigation into then-CIA Director David Petraeus’ extramarital affair to avoid a distraction prior to the 2012 presidential election, according to a former FBI official and two sources with direct knowledge of the agent’s account.


New details about the claims of Fred Humphries, a 17-year FBI veteran who is assigned to the bureau’s Tampa office, are expected to be included in a legal filing soon by Jill Kelley, a Tampa Bay socialite who became embroiled in the Petraeus investigation. NBC News independently learned how Humphries raised concerns about possible interference in the investigation with a former senior bureau official and Republican lawmakers, arguing that it could pose a potential national security risk. 


Kelley, who had close social connections to a wide array of senior U.S. military and intelligence officials, many of whom she met at parties she threw at her home, is suing current and former Obama administration officials for allegedly leaking her name and smearing her reputation after the case became public. Kelley’s lawsuit threatens to force a re-examination of the details of Petraeus’ resignation and to require a number of key players — including former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Deputy FBI Director Sean Joyce (who announced his resignation this week), Homeland Security Secretary nominee Jeh Johnson and many others — to answer questions under oath.



Petraeus resigned as CIA director one year ago this week after an FBI “cyberstalking” investigation into harassing emails sent to Kelley uncovered a sexual relationship between the CIA director and his biographer, Paula Broadwell.


Humphries’ claims about high-level interference from FBI headquarters were raised in multiple conversations last year with his former boss, Charles Mandigo, a former special agent in charge of the FBI’s Seattle office, where Humphries had previously been assigned. Mandigo then helped arrange for Humphries to raise his concerns with two Republican members of Congress, including House Majority Leader Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va.


Humphries “said at one point, he had been told, just sit back and wait. Once the election is over, this will be quietly handled and it will all be resolved,” Mandigo said. Humphries attributed the comment to an unidentified  senior official in the FBI’s Tampa office, he said. 


Chris O’Meara / AP



Jill Kelley leaves her home in Tampa, Fla., on Nov. 13, 2012.




Among the claims in Kelley’s lawsuit, which relies in part on Humphries’ account, is that Joyce, the deputy FBI director, assumed control of the investigation, preempted decisions made by Tampa agents assigned to the case and, at one point, directed them to delay a scheduled interview with Broadwell. The suit alleges that the case was handled “differently than normal criminal investigations” because bureau officials “wanted to avoid attention before the upcoming presidential election cycle.”


An FBI spokesman declined comment, citing “pending litigation.” The Justice Department has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, asserting that she does not have grounds to bring the complaint under the Privacy Act. 


Humphries, who has been portrayed in some media reports as a whistleblower — although he was never specifically assigned to the Petraeus case — was informed last summer that he is the subject of a misconduct probe by the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility for the “unauthorized disclosure” of law enforcement information relating to the investigation, according to a source with direct knowledge of the matter.


Reached on his cellphone this week, Humphries declined to discuss details but said his decision to raise his concerns outside of bureau channels “was the right thing to do – even if it was unpleasant. If it happened again, I would do the same thing. Nobody is above the law, nobody is below it.” 


The investigation of Petraeus began in early June 2012 after Kelley and her husband stated receiving what they viewed as harassing and threatening emails from an anonymous correspondent – with the addresses “Kelley patrol” and “Tampa Angel.” The emailer appeared to know precise details about the private schedules of Petraeus and senior generals at the U.S. Central Command, including an upcoming dinner that Kelley had planned with the CIA director. The emails suggested the movements of senior U.S. officials as well as Kelley were “clearly being tracked by someone with a hostile fixation,” according to the lawsuit filed by Kelley and her husband, Sean Kelley, a doctor.


One email concluded with threats about “averting… embarrassment for all, including spouses, such as info in national headlines,” according to the Kelley complaint, which was filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., in June. 


Kelley first reported these emails to Humphries, a personal friend, who in turn passed them along to agents in Tampa who launched a “cyberstalking” investigation.  Although Humphries was not assigned to the investigation, he stayed in touch with Kelley and monitored developments in the probe. 


Humphries has alleged that in July 2012, he was called into the offices of Steve Ibison, then the special agent in charge of the Tampa office, and told that the “senior leadership of the FBI was convinced” he was having sexual relations with Kelley, according to a source directly familiar with his account. Humphries denied the charges — as has Kelley — and offered to take a polygraph, but that offer was not accepted, the source said. (An FBI spokesman in Tampa declined comment.)


Shortly thereafter, Humphries reached out to Mandigo, his former boss and expressed concern that he was being made a “scapegoat” in a politically toxic investigation. 


“What troubled me is somebody was clearly going out their way to discredit the guy,” Mandigo said. “They were engaging in character assassination.”


Mandigo, who had previously served as a FBI spokesman in Washington, praised Humphries as a “great agent” who played a leading role in major counterterrorism cases, including the investigation into the so-called “millennium bomber” Ahmed Ressam, an al Qaeda operative who tried to blow up Los Angeles International Airport in December 1999. But Humphries, according to Mandigo, was also known as a maverick who sometimes ran afoul of FBI headquarters, including writing memos questioning aggressive interrogation techniques while serving as a deputy FBI commander at the U.S. detention facility in Guantanamo.


Mandigo said he became especially concerned when he learned from Humphries that FBI agents had traced the harassing emails to Broadwell, Petraeus’ biographer. Mandigo said he and Humphries believed there were “national security concerns” that demanded that the investigation be aggressively pursued and concluded.


“Consider the possibility that one or both of them (Petraeus and Broadwell) could have been compromised,” Mandigo said. “If that happened, how could they rationalize how they handled this?”


After several conversations, Mandigo helped arrange for Humphries to raise his concerns with Republican Rep. Dave Reichert, who represented the Seattle area, and then with Cantor during the week before last year’s election. 


According to accounts provided by U.S. law enforcement  and congressional officials last year, Cantor, alerted by Reichert, called Humphries on Oct. 27. Steve Sombres, the majority leader’s chief of staff, then called then FBI Director Bob Mueller’s chief of staff on Oct. 31 to inquire about the Petraeus probe.


In the days that followed, FBI agents completed their second interviews with Petraeus and Broadwell. At 5 p.m. on Tuesday, Nov. 6 — Election Day — Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was informed by the FBI of the investigation and that the CIA director had acknowledged a sexual relationship with Broadwell. That Friday, Nov. 9, Petraeus resigned.


The Kelley lawsuit is focused on her treatment during the investigation, alleging agents violated her privacy by demanding “unrestricted access” to her private emails and, along with senior Defense Department officials, later leaked information about them — suggesting she was having an inappropriate relationship with Gen. John Allen, then the U.S. commander in Afghanistan.


Her complaint also describes a scene in the driveway of her Tampa home on July 17, 2012 in which, she alleges, FBI agents confronted her while her three children were in her house and demanded she get in a SUV for questioning. When she balked, “the agents threatened her, demanding that she not make them do something in front of her children that may terrify them.” After she got in the SUV, the complaint states, agents “demanded she answer bewildering questions regarding her relationship with Director Petraeus and General Allen — including insinuations and accusations that she was engaged in adulterous activity.”


During the height of the furor over the case, Humphries was reported to have sent a “shirtless” photo to Kelley. But Mandigo noted that he and many others had gotten a copy of the same “joke” photo years earlier. It showed Humphries next to two mannequins at a shooting range. Humphries was known for sending such photos, he said, adding, “That’s just Fred.” 


More from NBC News Investigations:


Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook



Investigate this!


Read and vote on readers’ story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.





Investigations



Agent feared FBI was stalling Petraeus investigation until after 2012 election

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Obama to Boehner: No talks until government opens








House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio arrives on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Oct. 7, 2013. The Republican-controlled House and the Democrat-controlled Senate are at an impasse, neither side backing down, after House GOP conservatives linked the funding bill to President Obama’s existent health care law. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio arrives on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Oct. 7, 2013. The Republican-controlled House and the Democrat-controlled Senate are at an impasse, neither side backing down, after House GOP conservatives linked the funding bill to President Obama’s existent health care law. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, escorts a group of constituents through the Capitol Rotunda during a lull in activity in the House of Representatives, Monday, Oct. 7, 2013, in Washington. The government partially shut down last week amid Washington gridlock and faces a make-or-break deadline later this month about the nation’s borrowing power. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





Normally packed with tourists, the stairs leading from the Capitol Visitors Center up to the Capitol Rotunda are empty as the government shutdown enters a second week, Monday, Oct. 7, 2013, in Washington. The government partially shut down last week amid Washington gridlock and faces a make-or-break deadline later this month about the nation’s borrowing power. Republicans have refused to budge without concessions on Democrats’ health care law. Democrats have resisted GOP efforts to dismantle that health care law. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — President Barack Obama called the top Republican in the GOP-controlled House Tuesday, telling Speaker John Boehner once again that he won’t negotiate over reopening the government or must-pass legislation to prevent a U.S. default on its obligations.


In the second week of the partial government shutdown, Obama’s call, revealed by Boehner’s office, came as the speaker softened the tone of his rhetoric in remarks to the media and as Democrats controlling the Senate planned to move quickly toward a vote to allow the government to borrow more money by raising the statutory limit on the federal debt.


The White House confirmed the call and said Obama repeated to Boehner “what he told him when they met at the White House last week: the president is willing to negotiate with Republicans — after the threat of government shutdown and default have been removed — over policies that Republicans think would strengthen the country.”


“I want to have a conversation. I’m not drawing lines in the sand. It is time for us to just sit down and resolve our differences,” said Boehner, R-Ohio.


He added: “There’s no boundaries here. There’s nothing on the table, there’s nothing off the table.”


For his part, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he is willing to negotiate over the budget but only after the government is funded and the debt ceiling lifted.


“All we’re asking is that government be reopened. Stop threatening a catastrophic default on the nation’s bills,” the Nevada Democrat said.


A spokesman said Reid could unveil the debt limit measure as early as Tuesday, setting the table for a test vote later in the week. The measure is expected to provide enough borrowing room to last beyond next year’s election, which means it likely will permit $ 1 trillion or more in new borrowing above the current $ 16.7 trillion debt ceiling that the administration says will be hit on Oct. 17. It’s not expected to include new spending cuts sought by Republicans.


GOP aides said that the House vote would set up a new bipartisan panel to negotiate reopening the government and avoiding a default, tied to legislation to make sure federal employees who are required to work during the partial shutdown get paid on time.


Those affected include families of service members killed in action. Survivors are typically sent a $ 100,000 payment within three days to help with costs such as funeral expenses. Because of the shutdown, the Defense Department doesn’t have the authority to make the payments, officials said Monday, even though most of the department’s civilian workers have been recalled.


Some 350,000 civilian Defense Department workers were summoned back to work Monday as the result of legislation Congress passed and Obama signed after the shutdown began. Many other agencies, such as NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency, remain mostly shuttered.


Even the White House is feeling the effects, with about 3 out of 4 staffers furloughed.


It’s not clear whether Reid’s gambit will work in the Senate. Republicans are expected to oppose the measure if it doesn’t contain budget cuts to make a dent in deficits. The question is whether Republicans will try to hold up the measure with a filibuster. Such a showdown could unnerve the financial markets.


Until recently, debt limit increases have not been the target of filibusters; the first in memory came four years ago, when Democrats controlled the Senate with a filibuster-proof 60 votes.


Many Republicans in the Senate, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Whip John Cornyn of Texas, have voted for so-called clean debt limit increases during Republican administrations.


Some Republicans seemed wary of participating in a filibuster that could rattle the stock and bond markets.


“We shouldn’t be dismissing anything out of hand, whether it’s the debt ceiling or what we’re going to do with this government shutdown,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said. “We’ve got a situation where you’ve got a calendar running, you’ve got people who are frustrated and upset, so let’s figure it out.”


The impasse over the shutdown — sparked by House Republicans’ insistence that a temporary funding bill contain concessions on Obama’s health care law — shows no signs of breaking, as each side sticks to its guns and repeats its talking points.


Democrats from Obama on down to the most junior lawmakers said again that the House should vote immediately on ending the partial closure of the government. Obama said that Boehner “doesn’t apparently want to see the … shutdown end at the moment, unless he’s able to extract concessions that don’t have anything to do with the budget.”


Boehner, in rebuttal Monday, called on Obama to agree to negotiations on changes in “Obamacare” and steps to curb deficits, the principal GOP demands for ending the shutdown that began with the Oct. 1 beginning of the new fiscal year, and eliminating the threat of default. “Really, Mr. President. It’s time to have that conversation before our economy is put further at risk,” Boehner said on the House floor.


The White House has said repeatedly the president will not negotiate with Republicans until the government is fully reopened and the debt limit has been raised. But it hasn’t said the debt limit measure has to be completely “clean” of add-ons.


White House aide Jason Furman told reporters the White House could accept some add-ons if Boehner “needs to have some talking point for his caucus that’s consistent with us not negotiating … that’s not adding a bunch of extraneous conditions.” Another White House official, Gene Sperling, said the administration could be open to an interim, short-term debt limit extension to prevent a catastrophic default.


Republicans were sticking with a strategy of trying to pin the blame for the shutdown on Obama for being unwilling to negotiate. The House also passed legislation Monday to reopen the Food and Drug Administration, the latest in a series of piecemeal funding bills to advance through the GOP-controlled chamber.


It’s been commonly assumed that Republicans would suffer politically from the shutdown and the early polling data seems to bear that out.


A survey released Monday by The Washington Post and ABC News said disapproval of Republican handling of the budget showdown was measured at 70 percent, up from 63 percent a week earlier. Disapproval of Obama’s role was statistically unchanged at 51 percent.


Associated Press




Top Headlines



Obama to Boehner: No talks until government opens

Monday, September 30, 2013

Rice: Sanctions stay until Iran proves it isn’t seeking a bomb


Despite signals that Iran and the US were working towards a nuclear deal, National Security Adviser Susan Rice said Sunday that sanctions against the Islamic Republic would remain in place until the US and its allies are satisfied Iran is not pursuing nuclear weapons.


“Obviously, we and others in the international community have every reason to be skeptical of that and we need to test it, and any agreement must be fully verifiable and enforceable,” said Rice in an interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria.


She said it had been clear to Iran that it “had to meet its international obligations under Security Council resolutions and that the sanctions would remain until those obligations were satisfied.”


The White House national security adviser and former ambassador to the UN said the US wouldn’t agree to let Iran enrich its own uranium. She said US President Barack Obama made clear that Washington accepted Iran’s right to use enriched uranium for peaceful energy purposes — apparently from supervised overseas sources — but not to enrich the material itself.


Asked whether the US shared Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s four demands — that Iran halt uranium enrichment, remove already enriched material, close the Fordo nuclear facility, and discontinue the plutonium track in Arak — Rice replied: “Obviously, we are in constant contact and communication with our Israeli allies and other key allies in this process. And we have been largely united in agreeing on the process going forward, and on what is necessary to give us a shared degree of confidence. And when I say us, I mean all of us in the international community, a shared degree of confidence that at the end of this process, that Iran’s nuclear program, if there is to be one, is only for peaceful purposes.”


She said she would not “get into the contours of a negotiation that really hasn’t gotten underway in any meaningful way,” but stressed “that we have been on this program in the P5+1 and with Israel and other partners in the region, and, indeed, within the entire international community, as enshrined in Security Council resolutions on insisting on the steps that need to be taken.”


Concerning the UN Security Council resolution to strip Syria of its chemical weapons, Rice said the demand was worded strongly enough, but noted that military action against Syria in case of noncompliance would require Security Council approval. 


“I think it’s important for people to understand what this resolution accomplishes,” Rice said. ”In fact, it does say, in very clear-cut terms, that if there is noncompliance on the part of the Syrians, there will be action taken under Chapter 7 of the United Nations Charter. Chapter 7 is the only chapter of the Charter that calls for — and allows for — enforcement action.”


Rice admitted, however, that before the UN could act under Chapter 7, the Security Council would have to reconvene and approve military action.


“Obviously, in any circumstance, we would need to come back to the Security Council if we sought multilateral endorsement of such enforcement action in the circumstances, [and] have a negotiation about what that action ought to be,” she said.


On Friday, the UN Security Council unanimously voted to eliminate all of Syria’s estimated 1,000-ton chemical weapons stockpile by mid-2014.


Rice said that the threat of further action if Syria doesn’t follow through with relinquishing its chemical weapons was a key aspect that US Secretary of State John Kerry negotiated with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov when they met in Geneva earlier this month.


Besides the UN resolution, Rice warned, the US reserves the right to act of its own accord, including using military force.


“The president has been very clear that we remain postured to act if the choice is taken by him and if the necessity arises,” she said. “We’re not taking any options off the table. And the president has been very clear that, as commander-in-chief, he has the authority to act in the interests of the United States and to use force if necessary.”





WHAT REALLY HAPPENED



Rice: Sanctions stay until Iran proves it isn’t seeking a bomb

Rice: Sanctions stay until Iran proves it isn’t seeking a bomb


Despite signals that Iran and the US were working towards a nuclear deal, National Security Adviser Susan Rice said Sunday that sanctions against the Islamic Republic would remain in place until the US and its allies are satisfied Iran is not pursuing nuclear weapons.


“Obviously, we and others in the international community have every reason to be skeptical of that and we need to test it, and any agreement must be fully verifiable and enforceable,” said Rice in an interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria.


She said it had been clear to Iran that it “had to meet its international obligations under Security Council resolutions and that the sanctions would remain until those obligations were satisfied.”


The White House national security adviser and former ambassador to the UN said the US wouldn’t agree to let Iran enrich its own uranium. She said US President Barack Obama made clear that Washington accepted Iran’s right to use enriched uranium for peaceful energy purposes — apparently from supervised overseas sources — but not to enrich the material itself.


Asked whether the US shared Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s four demands — that Iran halt uranium enrichment, remove already enriched material, close the Fordo nuclear facility, and discontinue the plutonium track in Arak — Rice replied: “Obviously, we are in constant contact and communication with our Israeli allies and other key allies in this process. And we have been largely united in agreeing on the process going forward, and on what is necessary to give us a shared degree of confidence. And when I say us, I mean all of us in the international community, a shared degree of confidence that at the end of this process, that Iran’s nuclear program, if there is to be one, is only for peaceful purposes.”


She said she would not “get into the contours of a negotiation that really hasn’t gotten underway in any meaningful way,” but stressed “that we have been on this program in the P5+1 and with Israel and other partners in the region, and, indeed, within the entire international community, as enshrined in Security Council resolutions on insisting on the steps that need to be taken.”


Concerning the UN Security Council resolution to strip Syria of its chemical weapons, Rice said the demand was worded strongly enough, but noted that military action against Syria in case of noncompliance would require Security Council approval. 


“I think it’s important for people to understand what this resolution accomplishes,” Rice said. ”In fact, it does say, in very clear-cut terms, that if there is noncompliance on the part of the Syrians, there will be action taken under Chapter 7 of the United Nations Charter. Chapter 7 is the only chapter of the Charter that calls for — and allows for — enforcement action.”


Rice admitted, however, that before the UN could act under Chapter 7, the Security Council would have to reconvene and approve military action.


“Obviously, in any circumstance, we would need to come back to the Security Council if we sought multilateral endorsement of such enforcement action in the circumstances, [and] have a negotiation about what that action ought to be,” she said.


On Friday, the UN Security Council unanimously voted to eliminate all of Syria’s estimated 1,000-ton chemical weapons stockpile by mid-2014.


Rice said that the threat of further action if Syria doesn’t follow through with relinquishing its chemical weapons was a key aspect that US Secretary of State John Kerry negotiated with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov when they met in Geneva earlier this month.


Besides the UN resolution, Rice warned, the US reserves the right to act of its own accord, including using military force.


“The president has been very clear that we remain postured to act if the choice is taken by him and if the necessity arises,” she said. “We’re not taking any options off the table. And the president has been very clear that, as commander-in-chief, he has the authority to act in the interests of the United States and to use force if necessary.”





WHAT REALLY HAPPENED



Rice: Sanctions stay until Iran proves it isn’t seeking a bomb

Thursday, September 19, 2013

We’ve got a few billion years left until Earth’s too hot to live on

AP Photo/Eduardo Verdugo

Twin hurricanes in Mexico


People stand on the edge of a collapsed bridge, background, as they wait to ferry their goods via a boat across the Papagayos River, south of Acapulco, near Lomas de Chapultepec, Mexico, Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2013. Mexico was hit by the one-two punch of twin storms over the weekend, and the storm that soaked Acapulco on Sunday – Manuel -re-formed into a tropical storm Wednesday, threatening to bring more flooding to the country’s northern coast. With roads blocked by landslides, rockslides, floods and collapsed bridges, Acapulco was cut off from road transport.




Salon.com



We’ve got a few billion years left until Earth’s too hot to live on

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Rates held until unemployment falls






























LIVE: Bank of England governor’s inflation report



Bank of England governor Mark Carney has said the Bank will not consider raising interest rates until the jobless rate has fallen to 7% or below.


Mr Carney said this would require the creation of about 750,000 jobs and could take three years.


The UK unemployment rate currently stands at 7.8%.


The unemployment threshold will hold unless inflation levels threaten to rise too fast or it poses a significant threat to financial stability.


Mr Carney said that until the threshold was reached the Bank would not cut back on its £375bn asset purchase programme, known as quantitative easing (QE).


While upbeat on the prospects for the UK economy, Mr Carney said it had not reached “escape velocity” yet.


“A renewed recovery is now underway in the United Kingdom and it appears to be broadening,” he said.


“While that is certainly welcome, the legacy of the financial crisis means that the recovery remains weak by historical standards and there is still a significant margin of spare capacity in the economy, this is most clearly evident in the high rate of unemployment.”


On the markets, shares rose and the pound fell immediately after the Bank’s statement was released, although the movements were quickly reversed.


There had been widespread expectation that Mr Carney would commit the Bank to the new strategy, known as “forward guidance”.


With short-term interest rates already at historic lows, the aim is to reduce longer-term interest rates.


Knowing interest rates could remain low, potentially for years, gives banks and mortgage lenders the ability to “lock-in” customers at lower rates for longer.




Powered By WizardRSS.com &
Pocket Chainsaw – a must have Survival tool, with many uses.

BBC News – Home

Rates held until unemployment falls

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Rep. Steve King: Scrap Immigration Reform Until Obama is Gone

Congress should not address comprehensive immigration reform until there’s a new president of the United States, Rep. Steve King tells Newsmax TV.

“Congress does not have an obligation to resolve the issue of the 11 million to 33 million people who are here illegally,” King, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, tells Newsmax in an exclusive interview. “They came here on their own. They came here to live in the shadows.


“There’s no moral calling for us to solve the problem that they created for themselves,” he adds. “They can easily solve it just by returning to the country where they can live legally.”


The GOP-controlled House will hold a special conference on immigration on Wednesday. King forced the closed-door strategy session by obtaining signatures from fellow House members.


Story continues below the video.



Last month, King hosted a six-hour marathon news conference on Capitol Hill to protest the pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants that was included in the sweeping reform legislation later approved on a 68-32 vote by the Senate. The bill was sent to the House.


“I hope we get to this tomorrow in the special conference in such a way that members are in a position where they have to articulate their positions and they’ll listen to others,” King tells Newsmax of the strategy session. “If you legalize people that are here illegally, that means that it is a path to citizenship.


“Eventually, those folks that are rewarded with the objective of their crime will be voting,” he says. “They will have the measure of citizenship — and we can get to that piece, maybe we can understand then, as a group, that there’s nothing in this for Republicans, Independents, Americans.


“It isn’t good for the American people. The only people in America who are beneficiaries of such a policy would be elitists, political power-brokering Democrats and those who hire illegals. Other than that, there’s nothing in it for Americans.


“There’s no reason for us to do this — and we have no obligation, no moral obligation, to bring people out of the shadows,” King adds. “They came here to live in the shadows. I suggest we enforce the law we have and otherwise let them have what they came here for, which is to live in the shadows.”


The strategy session is to be led by House Speaker John Boehner, who has said he will not bring up the Senate’s immigration bill for a vote, given strong opposition among the Republican conference.


Boehner said on Monday that the House would develop its own immigration overhaul plan.


King hopes the Speaker honors his pledge.


“I’d like to take it off the table — and I’d like to see leadership make a statement that we’re not going to legalize people that are here illegally,” King tells Newsmax. “We’re going to take up the important business of the American people — and a lot of that is oversight over this Obama administration that refuses to enforce the law. That’s where we need to go. I want to restore the rule of law and I don’t want to grant amnesty.”


No matter how any possible immigration legislation might make it to the House floor — in pieces, as the Judiciary Committee supports, or as one comprehensive bill — King says it should not happen. “If it comes to the floor, it will be brought to the floor with the votes to pass it.”


He notes that the committee’s bill includes provisions for strong border security, empowering local governments to enforce immigration laws, for instance.


“Any vehicle that we send over to the Senate is potentially a conference-able bill — and if we send that over to the Senate, you know [Senate Majority Leader] Harry Reid can just put a little bit of language in there that guts it or actually strikes it all out, put in the Senate’s Gang of Eight amnesty bill and send it back to us or insist on a conference,” King suggests.


“There’s no reason for us to be vulnerable on losing the rule of law over the idea that the Senate’s never going to pass anything that fails to legalize people that have broken the law. The president’s not going to sign anything that doesn’t give him his political objective — and the president don’t enforce the law, so we cannot do business with a president who will not honor his own oath of office.”


King continued his attack on President Barack Obama over immigration, reflecting on recent developments on Obamacare.


“The president’s not going to enforce the law; he’s made that clear. Even with Obamacare — the bill with his own name on it and his own signature on it — he’s decided he can amend his own bill by simply sending a memo out posting it on a website.


“That’s appalling to me from a constitutional perspective,” King adds, “and I can’t do business with a man who is no more trustworthy than that.”


© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Rep. Steve King: Scrap Immigration Reform Until Obama is Gone