Showing posts with label silent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label silent. Show all posts

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Blathering Barack or Silent Cal?

At Those Damn Liars, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Those Damn Liars and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Those Damn Liars makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Those Damn Liars does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Those Damn Liars.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Those Damn Liars and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Those Damn Liars send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Those Damn Liars has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Those Damn Liars"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Blathering Barack or Silent Cal?

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Israel Silent on Chemical Weapons


“Does Israel have chemical weapons too?” is the question posed by the U.S. publication Foreign Policy, citing a newly uncovered CIA document from 1983 which alleged that Israel is likely to have developed such weapons.


Written ten years after the 1973 war in which Egypt and Syria attacked Israel, the CIA document revealed in Foreign Policy alleged that “Israel undertook a program of chemical warfare preparations in both offensive and protective areas.”


True or not, the report underpins Israel’s doctrine to deter frontline Arab states from attacking it by tilting the balance of power in its favor, Prof. Shlomo Aronson, Israeli weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) scholar at the Hebrew University Jlem tells IPS.


“Since the Arab states started to produce chemical weapons, it would be quite natural that Israel has something similar. They have chemical weapons. We must have them as well.”


“Syria produced chemical weapons to balance the threat of Israeli nuclear weapons,” Ziad Abu Zayyad, former head of the Palestinian delegation to the Middle East peace talks on Arms Control and Regional Security (1991-1996) tells IPS.


“While we cannot confirm whether the Israelis possess lethal chemical agents,” the CIA report said, “several indicators lead us to believe that they have available to them at least persistent and non-persistent nerve agents, a mustard agent, and several riot-control agents, marched with suitable delivery systems.”


It’s been known since the early 1970s that chemical tests are conducted at the secretive Israel Institute for Biological Research located in the town of Ness Ziona, 20 km south of Tel Aviv.


The secret Intel file identified “a probable chemical weapons nerve agent production facility and a storage facility at the Dimona Sensitive Storage area in the Negev desert,” – that is, in the vicinity of the nuclear research center where it’s widely assumed that nuclear warheads have been manufactured.


Whether Israel retains the alleged chemical stockpile is unknown.


Officially, it neither confirms nor denies the existence of a chemical weapons program – let alone of a nuclear weapons program – and intentionally shrouds in ambiguity its suspected weapons of mass destruction (WMD) program, only exhibiting chemical warfare protection drills and gas mask kits distribution centers.


Aronson deciphers the Israeli WMD doctrine – “not to admit the existence of WMDs before peace prevails; not taking the Arab people hostage to the behavior of their leaders; not committing publicly to any red line in the realm of unconventional weapons.”


Israel signed the Chemical Weapons Convention (September 1993) which prohibits the production, stockpiling and use of such arms, but never ratified it.


If implemented, the convention would endow chemical weapons inspectors with intrusive powers, notes Aronson. “The treaty could allow inspectors in Israel’s facilities, including the nuclear facility.”


Abu Zayyad believes that after Syria, Israel should disarm from its chemical weapons.


“There should be a linkage,” he tells IPS. “We’re aiming at a WMDs-free Middle East.”


Israel rejects any demand to link Syria’s chemical disarmament with a ratification of the Convention that would lead to the dismantlement of the arsenal it reportedly has.


“The big difference is Syria, not Israel, uses chemical weapons,” Aronson points out. “Conventional Israel was never accepted. Unconventional Israel was, and is, accepted. Our very survival rests on unconventional weapons.”


“Peace is the sole solution to Israel’s security predicament,” counters Abu Zayyad.


Israel declines to answer queries by foreign journalists, opting instead for more discreet reactions in the local media.


“Some of the countries in the region don’t recognize Israel’s right to exist and blatantly call to annihilate it,” a Foreign Ministry spokesperson was quoted in the liberal newspaper Haaretz.”


“In this context, the chemical weapons threat against Israel and its civilian population is neither theoretical nor distant,” the official said by way of rationale for not ratifying the Convention.


US Secretary of State John Kerry flew to Jerusalem to brief Netanyahu about the U.S.-Russian framework agreement on terminating Syria’s chemical weapons the day after it was a done deal.


“If we achieve that,” Kerry declared, “We’ll have set a marker for the standard of behavior with respect to Iran and North Korea.”
“The determination the international community shows regarding Syria will have a direct impact on the Syrian regime’s patron Iran,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said to Kerry. “If diplomacy has any chance to work, it must be coupled with a credible military threat.”


Netanyahu knows that the US, after having precisely adopted such a two-pronged approach on Syria, cannot afford not to back Israel publicly on Iran, even as Tehran is signaling readiness to compromise on its nuclear program.


And for the time being, demands for Israel to disarm from its alleged poison gas arsenal are bound to evaporate into thin air.


Inter Press Service


Read more by Pierre Klochendler





Antiwar.com Original



Israel Silent on Chemical Weapons

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Polish govt again silent over alleged CIA ‘black hole’ sites on its territory



Published time: September 24, 2013 13:18

A guard shuts the gate to the airport in Szymany in northeastern Poland in this file 2005 picture. Polish media said November 5, 2005 the airport was identified by Human Rights Watch as a potential site of alleged CIA prisons used to interrogate al Qaeda captives. Poland strongly denied it was hosting such facilities.(Reuters / Tomasz Marek)

A guard shuts the gate to the airport in Szymany in northeastern Poland in this file 2005 picture. Polish media said November 5, 2005 the airport was identified by Human Rights Watch as a potential site of alleged CIA prisons used to interrogate al Qaeda captives. Poland strongly denied it was hosting such facilities.(Reuters / Tomasz Marek)




Warsaw has, for a second time in 12 months, rejected a request from the European Court of Human Rights to hand over information involving the alleged existence of secret CIA prisons operating on its territory.


The Polish government said it could not comply with a new request filed by the European court over the detention of Saudi-born Abu Zubaydah, who was later transferred to Guantanamo Bay prison, Reuters reported Tuesday. The officials said their comments might compromise a Polish criminal investigation.


“The government takes the position that at the present stage of domestic proceedings, were they to address in detail all the questions submitted by the court, they could be seen as interfering with the competencies of the prosecution authority and the courts,” the agency reported the government as saying in its statement.


Although Poland has been applauded for being the only Eastern European country to begin its own investigation into claims of clandestine CIA prisons operating in the country, human rights activists have expressed their frustration with the lack of progress in the government’s five-year-old inquiry.


Human rights organizations say the secret prisons served for “extraordinary rendition” of suspects who were flown in from around the world without legislative oversight, and were often tortured.


Any proven participation of Polish officials in the alleged US intelligence program would be considered a crime under both Polish and international law.


In 2008, Prime Minister Donald Tusk, while falling short of admitting Poland’s participation in the CIA program, vowed that his country would never act outside the boundaries of democracy.


“This is a painful but very clear proof that no politician, even if hand-in-hand with the biggest superpower in the world, can do something that will never see the light of the day,” Tusk said. “We must act calmly, discreetly and in the spirit of responsibility for the state on this, but we can take no pride in the fact that such cases must be investigated in Poland.”


Five years later, Zbigniew Siemiatkowski, the chief of Poland’s intelligence services from 2002 to 2004, was formally charged in Poland with “depriving prisoners of their liberty” in US President George W. Bush’s so-called “War on Terror.”


Investigators believe a military base in Stare Kiejkuty, northeastern Poland, was the location of one of the CIA secret prisons between December 2002 and September 2003.


Some of the terrorist suspects allegedly transferred through Poland ended up in Guantanamo Bay, where the conditions are so deplorable that a 2005 Amnesty International report dubbed it the “Gulag of our times.”


In January 2013, Polish prosecutors awarded Abu Zubaydah, who was arrested in Pakistan in March 2002 and is now being held in Guantanamo, “victim status” in the investigation, following claims he was subjected to extraordinary rendition and secret detention in Poland.


Zubaydah, whose lawyer says he was detained and tortured for 4 1/2 years in secret CIA prisons in Thailand, Poland, Romania, Lithuania and Morocco, was one of 14 “high-value detainees” transferred to Guantánamo in September 2006.


Zubaydah, however, was eventually told by his US captors that they had made a mistake in suspecting him of being a leading member of Al-Qaeda. This was after he had been subjected 83 times to waterboarding, according to a 2005 US Justice Department legal memo.


Waterboarding, which has now been universally condemned as a form of torture, is a technique that leads victims to believe they are drowning.


“They told me, ‘Sorry, we discover that you are not No. 3, not a partner, not even a fighter,’” said Abu Zubaida, according to the transcript of a Combatant Status Review Tribunal.


Another victim of the interrogation technique was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, who was alleged to have been waterboarded 183 times while being held at Stare Kiejkuty.


More astonishing, however, is how much the president of Poland at the time, Alexander Kwasniewski, was apparently aware of the activities between Polish intelligence and the CIA.


In 2011, Gazeta Wyborcza reported that, based on a high-ranking source in Poland’s Democratic Left Alliance, Kwasniewski only found out about the CIA “black site” at Stare Kiejkuty, situated just over 100 kilometers from Warsaw, when Bush personally thanked him for Poland‘s assistance in the “War on Terror.”


When Kwasniewski subsequently learned that CIA-leased planes had been flying terrorist suspects in and out of Poland, he ordered the detention center to be shut down, the sources told the Polish daily.


The newspaper added, however, that Poland’s investigation is being actively pursued, that Zubaydah’s lawyer had access to many of the case files and that it would provide the European Court of Human Rights with extracts of the files that were not confidential.


The US has acknowledged that it had secret prisons around the world where it detained suspects in the “War on Terror.” Holding the detainees on foreign territory meant that the individuals were not entitled to legal protection guaranteed under US law.


Polish officials, meanwhile, still deny the country hosted any US “black sites,” though they say that in 2002 and 2003, CIA aircraft made illegal flights into an airfield in northern Poland, near the site of the alleged prison.




RT – News



Polish govt again silent over alleged CIA ‘black hole’ sites on its territory

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Supreme Wrecking Crew Fells Another Pillar: The Right To Remain Silent


cont-shred_dees


by Zen Gardner


This one slipped by in the midst of all the recent smokescreen chaos in the news. Like many of these critical losses of liberty being cinched tighter and tighter on the American belt, they come either buried in other legislation, are signed in clandestine emergency sessions or are just rammed through while another staged false flag shooting, bombing or some such emergency sweeps the public into another frenzy of fear and emotional outpouring.


Believe me, people are confused. The media cannot possibly cover every base and besides, things just don’t add up. Yes, the average American has been so dumbed down, distracted and stupefied that a lot can be gotten away with, but it accumulates. And people are starting to realize they’ve been taken in one or more ways which invariably leads to seeing how it has happened or is happening to them in other ways.


Couple that with a serious economic downturn and real shortages and you’ll see why the government is arming itself for an insurrection. It’s inevitable, and they are the ones deliberately bringing it on, same as the austerity and bail out squeezes in Europe.


All by design.


Meanwhile, the last legs to stand on based on our shredded Constitution are being hacked out from under us on a regular basis. This one should send shivers down your spine. With the draconian NDAA and other fascist measures firmly in place we’re virtually at the point that one is guilty until proven innocent, not a good prospect for a citizen of anywhere.


Here’s the news:


The Supreme Court handed down a decision on June 17 that has been ignored by most media outlets, despite its devastating effect on one of the most fundamental rights protected by the Constitution.


In a 5-4 ruling, the justices ruled that a person no longer has the right to remain silent as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. In relevant part, the Fifth Amendment mandates that no one “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”


Thanks to the Supreme Court’s decision in Salinas v. Texas, that part of the Bill of Rights has been excised — and has joined the list of so many other fundamental liberties that now lie on the scrap heap of history. More



Pretty sucky. And they keep rolling along unchecked. Is the push back about to surface?


Here’s an interesting conclusion:


The Declaration of Independence refers to this potential loss of un-alienable rights when it states:


…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…



The time has come for Declaration 2.0. (Full article here)



Something to think about. It certainly isn’t the time for sitting still, I’ll tell you that.


Love, Zen


[hat tip TallBrownElf - tx]


ZenGardner.com




Just Wondering – Alternative News and Opinions



Supreme Wrecking Crew Fells Another Pillar: The Right To Remain Silent

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Complete News Turkey cannot be silent on sarin issue Hisham Jaber



Ignore tags: news bloopers,autotune the news,news,fox news,onion news,funny news bloopers,news reporter bloopers,news anchor fail,cnn news,chocolate,news,blo…



Complete News Turkey cannot be silent on sarin issue Hisham Jaber