Articles and More!: New Study: ‘Geoengineering to Cause Drought Worldwide’

By Shepard Ambellas | November 10, 2013 | 1:43pm EST

A new study finds that geoengineering does exactly the opposite of what it’s supposed to do. Meanwhile, governments continue the cover-up of chemtrail applications worldwide.

Chemtrails or geoengineering application. Aerosol spraying. Please watch the film SHADE the Motion Picture to learn more. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)

(INTELLIHUB) — A recent study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres_[1]points out that global geoengineering applications actually do exactly the opposite of what proponents of geoengineering and scientists claim. Geoengineering activists and others have touched on this as well. However, geoengineering agendas still remain in full swing worldwide despite the public outcry and awakening. In fact, now private companies are even geoengineering our oceans under permits issued by United Nations (U.N.) blanketed programs against the best interests and will of the people.

While none of this should come as a surprise, especially if you have read white papers such as Henry Kissinger’s National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200)_[2]_. This very document authored by Kissinger in 1974 and released by the National Security Council (N.S.C.), detailed how there would be a need to control population growth in the world and also pointed out that weather and drought would indeed play into the overall plan. The memo even detailed that Africa and the mid-East would likely sustain heavy drought in the future reducing population numbers in third-world regions as a result. Interestingly enough, what we see to this day is an agenda that literally fall lockstep with Kissinger’s plan.

Now, most recently we can see with the publication entitled The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Inter-comparison Project (GeoMIP) information emerging that was previously withheld from the public by government and military agencies at all costs. ”The research found that geoengineering would cause a drop in both the amount and frequency of precipitation worldwide, particularly over some land areas. In the dozen computer models used for the study, monsoonal rains dropped by an average of 7 percent in North America, 6 percent in East Asia and South America and 5 percent in South Africa. Those seasonal rains are vital for sustaining crops in highly populated regions and substantial changes to monsoon seasons could have wide ramifications for food availability and political stability. In addition, the study found that average global precipitation could drop by about 4.5 percent.”, reported Andrew Freeman with ClimateCentral.org._[2] This is exactly the information the governments worldwide have been suppressing for over three decades.

John Fasullo, climate researcher and author of the study explained how “you have to pick your poison”, because what we are seeing now after careful study, is that geoengineering applications have both their upsides and downsides. Although right now it appears the downsides outweigh the positive effects yielded from such terraforming procedures. “The new study simulated the effects of using solar radiation management in an environment in which the amount of greenhouse gases in the air is four times the level observed at the start of the industrial revolution. That is far higher than today, since the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2), the main long-lived greenhouse gas, in the atmosphere has not yet doubled from the preindustrial level.

The study found that blocking some incoming solar radiation would alter the temperature profile of the atmosphere by cooling the lower atmosphere. At the same time, increased amounts of greenhouse gases would continue to warm the air at higher altitudes. That would make the atmosphere more stable and reduce the amount of storminess that would occur, said Simone Tilmes, a scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo.

According to Tilmes, “it’s not possible” for geoengineering to bring the climate back to where it was in preindustrial times, because the climate system will still be responding to the increased amounts of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.”, reported ClimateCentral.org in an amazingly astute piece._[3]

Recently the issue of geoengineering has gained major traction a key documentary films such as SHADE the Motion Picture and What In the World Are They Spraying? have done an excellent job of bringing this suppressed information out to the masses. Both films come highly recommended and can be used as a tool to educate others, bringing them up to speed on these very issues rather quickly.

Sources:

[1] The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Inter-comparison Project (GeoMIP) – OnLineLibrary.Wiley.com

[2] National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200) - Wikipedia.org

[3] Geoengineering Could Reduce Critical Global Rainfall – ClimateCentral.org

[4] SHADE the Motion Picture - SHADEtheMotionPicture.com

Writer Bio:

Shepard Ambellas founder, director and editor-in-chief of Intellihub.com, is a researcher, investigative journalist, radio talk show host, activist, and filmmaker. Follow him onTwitter.

For media inquires, interviews, questions or suggestions for this author, email: shepard@intellihub.com or telephone: (347) 759-6075.

*****

This content was brought to you by Intellihub.com

We make our content available for everyone to distribute and re-post as the information contained is vital. However, with that being said, we encourage you to donate as we are not funded by large corporate interests.

Note: Intellihub.com expressively grants permission to repost any article text on this site bearing the name “Intellihub.com” on the article’s byline header, attributing proper link-backs, keeping intact the article’s original byline header and writer bio. Images and articles not bearing the Intellihub.com header (byline) are subject to copyright by other parties. Intellihub.com maintains a contract with Getty Images.