Showing posts with label “No. Show all posts
Showing posts with label “No. Show all posts

Saturday, February 1, 2014

‘No direct US-Syria talks unless Kerry apologizes’ – Syrian FM

Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem (AFP Photo / SANA)
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem (AFP Photo / SANA)


The Syrian FM claims to have rejected a US offer of direct talks without the involvement of the opposition “tools” during the Geneva conference over John Kerry’s refusal to apologize for his biased speech. US officials denied seeking such a meeting.


On his way back to Syria, the country’s foreign minister Walid Muallem was asked why hadn’t the Damascus delegation spoken directly with the US without intermediaries from the opposition delegation.

“Frankly, the Americans have asked for that in Montruex and I refused unless Kerry apologizes for the speech he made in the conference,”
Walid Muallem told Syrian state media on board a plane bound for Damascus.


Syria’s foreign minister was apparently referring to the opening remarks of US Secretary of State John Kerry’s speech made in Montreux, Switzerland on January 22, who said that President Bashar Assad lost all legitimacy and cannot be a part of any transitional government.


“There is no way, not possible in the imagination, that the man who has led the brutal response to his own people could regain legitimacy to govern,” Kerry said in that speech. Walid Muallem rebuffed him at the time, saying no outside force had the right to “withdraw legitimacy” from the president or government except for the people of the country.


The US officials were quick to deny claims by Syria’s foreign minister that US diplomats were seeking direct negotiation with the Syrian delegation.


“At no point did the United States offer to negotiate directly with the Syrian regime,” State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said, though clarifying that the US indeed offered to connect with Syrian officials “on a staff level” through the United Nations and Joint Special Representative Lakhdar Brahimi.


Psaki added that the State Department will never apologize for the views expressed by the top US diplomat. “At no point will Secretary Kerry ever apologize for speaking the truth about the brutality the Assad regime has inflicted on the people of Syria,” she said.


US Secretary of State John Kerry (AFP Photo / Fabrice Coffrini)
US Secretary of State John Kerry (AFP Photo / Fabrice Coffrini)


The peace talks that ended in Geneva on Friday producing no concrete results and no official commitment from Damascus delegation to return to the negotiation table on February 10. The government and opposition were unable to bridge their differences on ceasefires, humanitarian corridors or the question of a transitional governing body.


In a security conference in Munich, the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said that he urged Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and US Secretary of State John Kerry “to use their influence to ensure the talks proceed as scheduled on February 10.”


Lavrov insisted that “Russia can do nothing alone” as he asked the US to apply their influence on the Syrian opposition.


Muallem, meanwhile, warned the opposition will eventually suffer a “reality shock” unless they abandon their “illusions” and drop unrealistic demands.


The Assad delegation has sought to focus the discussions on brutal acts of terrorism, and Muallem accused the opposition delegation for refusing to sign a declaration condemning such activity in Syria.

“This rejection is a smirch on the forehead of the coalition’s delegation, and as I said yesterday that any person in the world who suffered from terrorism would adopt this draft statement,”
Muallem said, adding that the foreign-based coalition who “live in 5-star hotels” knowing nothing about the Syrian reality.


The Syrian foreign minister also lashed out against the “unjust” international community that impose sanctions on a war-torn country.


“It is an ‘international community’ that adopts double standards policy and mostly dominated by the US… they dominate the UN Security Council and the UN,” Muallem said.

“When they say ‘international community’ we laugh as they do not represent the international community, for if we take into consideration the population of Russia, China, India and the BRICS countries, we find that they are the international community.”

Muallem questioned how could the West want to be involved Geneva dialogue and at the same time “impose sanctions on the Syrian people and children?” He asked European Union’s foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton to explain how can the West can sanction a ban on food products yet at the same time discuss the issue of humanitarian aid shipments.


The foreign minister concluded by saying that in the negation process, Syria will refuse anything that contradicts the constitution.

“This constitution was reached by a referendum and no one can reach or even think that the presidency is a topic of discussion.”


Source: RT




End the Lie – Independent News



‘No direct US-Syria talks unless Kerry apologizes’ – Syrian FM

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Sen. McConnell to vote "no" on Syria resolution


(AP) — Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell says he will oppose President Barack Obama’s resolution authorizing a military strike against Syria.


The Kentucky Republican says no vital national security risk is at play and there are too many unanswered questions about the United States’ long-term strategy in Syria.


McConnell says the proposal is, quote, “utterly detached from a wider strategy to end the civil war” in Syria.


McConnell becomes the first congressional leader to oppose Obama on his plans to punish Syria’s President Bashar Assad. The White House accuses Assad of using chemical weapons against his own people.


Congressional support for a strike has been weakening even as lawmakers scramble to respond to a Russian proposal to secure Assad’s chemical arsenal.


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



Sen. McConnell to vote "no" on Syria resolution

Sunday, September 8, 2013

Pryor joins Dem "no" vote on Syria

Mark Pryor is pictured. | AP Photo

Pryor joins a wide ideological spectrum of Democrats opposing the resolution. | AP Photo





Mark Pryor will not support President Barack Obama’s request for Congress to bless military action in Syria, contrasting the vulnerable Arkansas Democrat with his 2014 GOP Senate challenger Rep. Tom Cotton.


Pryor said Saturday that after lobbying from the administration and hearing input from his constituents he concluded that the White House has not made an effective case for the U.S. to intervene in the Syrian civil war.







“The Administration must prove a compelling national security interest, clearly define a mission that has a definitive end-state, and then build a true coalition of allies that would actively participate in any action we take,” Pryor said. “I do not believe these criteria have been met, and I cannot support military action against Syria at this time.”


The two-term senator is facing perhaps the toughest upper-chamber reelection campaign in his battle against the hawkish Cotton, a freshman who supports a military reaction to the alleged use of chemical weapons by Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad’s regime.


(PHOTOS: Syria: Where politicians stand)


Cotton is among the few House Republicans to publicly back Obama’s proposed action in Syria, citing the need to uphold an “international taboo” on chemical weapon use, reassure allies in the Middle East such as Israel and Jordan and uphold U.S. credibility overseas.


“Put simply, our core national-security interests are at stake,” Cotton said this week. “I share concerns that the president won’t execute a strategically sound military campaign. Nevertheless, I believe that U.S. inaction would still be a worse outcome for our national-security interests.”


Pryor joins a wide ideological spectrum of Democrats opposing the resolution that includes Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Chris Murphy of Connecticut, Brian Schatz of Hawaii and Tom Udall of New Mexico. The Senate is expected to begin voting on the limited military strike on Wednesday.


John Bresnahan contributed to this report.




POLITICO – Congress



Pryor joins Dem "no" vote on Syria

Pryor joins Dem "no" vote on Syria

Mark Pryor is pictured. | AP Photo

Pryor joins a wide ideological spectrum of Democrats opposing the resolution. | AP Photo





Mark Pryor will not support President Barack Obama’s request for Congress to bless military action in Syria, contrasting the vulnerable Arkansas Democrat with his 2014 GOP Senate challenger Rep. Tom Cotton.


Pryor said Saturday that after lobbying from the administration and hearing input from his constituents he concluded that the White House has not made an effective case for the U.S. to intervene in the Syrian civil war.







“The Administration must prove a compelling national security interest, clearly define a mission that has a definitive end-state, and then build a true coalition of allies that would actively participate in any action we take,” Pryor said. “I do not believe these criteria have been met, and I cannot support military action against Syria at this time.”


The two-term senator is facing perhaps the toughest upper-chamber reelection campaign in his battle against the hawkish Cotton, a freshman who supports a military reaction to the alleged use of chemical weapons by Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad’s regime.


(PHOTOS: Syria: Where politicians stand)


Cotton is among the few House Republicans to publicly back Obama’s proposed action in Syria, citing the need to uphold an “international taboo” on chemical weapon use, reassure allies in the Middle East such as Israel and Jordan and uphold U.S. credibility overseas.


“Put simply, our core national-security interests are at stake,” Cotton said this week. “I share concerns that the president won’t execute a strategically sound military campaign. Nevertheless, I believe that U.S. inaction would still be a worse outcome for our national-security interests.”


Pryor joins a wide ideological spectrum of Democrats opposing the resolution that includes Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Chris Murphy of Connecticut, Brian Schatz of Hawaii and Tom Udall of New Mexico. The Senate is expected to begin voting on the limited military strike on Wednesday.


John Bresnahan contributed to this report.




POLITICO – Congress



Pryor joins Dem "no" vote on Syria

Pryor joins Dem "no" vote on Syria

Mark Pryor is pictured. | AP Photo

Pryor joins a wide ideological spectrum of Democrats opposing the resolution. | AP Photo





Mark Pryor will not support President Barack Obama’s request for Congress to bless military action in Syria, contrasting the vulnerable Arkansas Democrat with his 2014 GOP Senate challenger Rep. Tom Cotton.


Pryor said Saturday that after lobbying from the administration and hearing input from his constituents he concluded that the White House has not made an effective case for the U.S. to intervene in the Syrian civil war.







“The Administration must prove a compelling national security interest, clearly define a mission that has a definitive end-state, and then build a true coalition of allies that would actively participate in any action we take,” Pryor said. “I do not believe these criteria have been met, and I cannot support military action against Syria at this time.”


The two-term senator is facing perhaps the toughest upper-chamber reelection campaign in his battle against the hawkish Cotton, a freshman who supports a military reaction to the alleged use of chemical weapons by Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad’s regime.


(PHOTOS: Syria: Where politicians stand)


Cotton is among the few House Republicans to publicly back Obama’s proposed action in Syria, citing the need to uphold an “international taboo” on chemical weapon use, reassure allies in the Middle East such as Israel and Jordan and uphold U.S. credibility overseas.


“Put simply, our core national-security interests are at stake,” Cotton said this week. “I share concerns that the president won’t execute a strategically sound military campaign. Nevertheless, I believe that U.S. inaction would still be a worse outcome for our national-security interests.”


Pryor joins a wide ideological spectrum of Democrats opposing the resolution that includes Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Chris Murphy of Connecticut, Brian Schatz of Hawaii and Tom Udall of New Mexico. The Senate is expected to begin voting on the limited military strike on Wednesday.


John Bresnahan contributed to this report.




POLITICO – Congress



Pryor joins Dem "no" vote on Syria