Showing posts with label Agenda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Agenda. Show all posts

Saturday, March 29, 2014

Hobby Lobby"s Secret Agenda: How It"s Quietly Funding a Vast Right-Wing Movement

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Hobby Lobby"s Secret Agenda: How It"s Quietly Funding a Vast Right-Wing Movement

Thursday, March 20, 2014

NASA Promotes Communist Agenda in New Research Study

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



NASA Promotes Communist Agenda in New Research Study

Monday, March 10, 2014

RT Anchor Quits Job on Live TV: Ron Paul Interview Cut, Putin"s Agenda Propaganda

RT Anchor Quits Job on Live TV: Ron Paul Interview Cut, Putin"s Agenda Propaganda
http://img.youtube.com/vi/HVhtcH0HihQ/0.jpg



RT Anchor Explains to CNN Anderson Cooper Why She Decides to Quit Job On Air over Ukraine Crisis CNN’s Anderson Cooper speaks with Former Russia Today Americ…




Read more about RT Anchor Quits Job on Live TV: Ron Paul Interview Cut, Putin"s Agenda Propaganda and other interesting subjects concerning World News Videos at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Monday, March 3, 2014

Russia sets Ukraine agenda with diplomacy, threats








Ukrainian soldiers stand guard at the gate of a military base in the port of Kerch, Ukraine, Monday, March 3, 2014. Pro-Russian troops controlled a ferry terminal on the easternmost tip of Ukraine’s Crimea region close to Russia on Monday, intensifying fears that Moscow will send even more troops into the strategic Black Sea region in its tense dispute with its Slavic neighbor. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)





Ukrainian soldiers stand guard at the gate of a military base in the port of Kerch, Ukraine, Monday, March 3, 2014. Pro-Russian troops controlled a ferry terminal on the easternmost tip of Ukraine’s Crimea region close to Russia on Monday, intensifying fears that Moscow will send even more troops into the strategic Black Sea region in its tense dispute with its Slavic neighbor. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)





A Ukrainian soldier stands guard at the gate of a military base in the port of Kerch, Ukraine, Monday, March 3, 2014. Pro-Russian troops controlled a ferry terminal on the easternmost tip of Ukraine’s Crimea region close to Russia on Monday, intensifying fears that Moscow will send even more troops into the strategic Black Sea region in its tense dispute with its Slavic neighbor. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)





A Ukrainian armored personnel carrier is stationed behind the gate of a military base in the port of Kerch, Ukraine, Monday, March 3, 2014. Pro-Russian troops controlled a ferry terminal on the easternmost tip of Ukraine’s Crimea region close to Russia on Monday, intensifying fears that Moscow will send even more troops into the strategic Black Sea region in its tense dispute with its Slavic neighbor. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)





Pro Russian soldiers wait outside a Ukrainian military base in the port of Kerch, Ukraine, Monday, March 3, 2014. Pro-Russian troops controlled a ferry terminal on the easternmost tip of Ukraine’s Crimea region close to Russia on Monday, intensifying fears that Moscow will send even more troops into the strategic Black Sea region in its tense dispute with its Slavic neighbor. The seizure of the terminal in the Ukrainian city of Kerch about 20 kilometers (12 miles) by boat to Russia, comes as the U.S. and European governments try to figure out ways to halt and reverse the Russian incursion. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)





A pro-Russian soldier stands by a billboard with a map of Crimea and bearing the words “Autonomous Republic of Crimea” in the port of Kerch, Ukraine, Monday, March 3, 2014. Pro-Russian troops controlled a ferry terminal on the easternmost tip of Ukraine’s Crimea region close to Russia on Monday, intensifying fears that Moscow will send even more troops into the strategic Black Sea region in its tense dispute with its Slavic neighbor. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







KIEV, Ukraine (AP) — Russia called for the adoption of a national unity deal in Ukraine even as it tightened its stranglehold over Crimea, an audacious combination of diplomacy and escalating military pressure. The U.S. and European Union floundered for solutions — while global markets panicked over the prospect of violent upheaval in the heart of Europe.


Fears grew that the Kremlin might carry out more land grabs in pro-Russian eastern Ukraine, adding urgency to Western efforts to defuse the crisis. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was heading to Kiev in an expression of support for Ukraine’s sovereignty, and the EU threatened a raft of punitive measures as it called an emergency summit on Ukraine for Thursday.


But it was Russia that appeared to be driving the agenda.


Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in Geneva at the beginning of a U.N. Human Rights Council session that Ukraine should return to the Feb. 21 agreement signed by pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych — but not Moscow — aimed at ending Ukraine’s crisis. Yanukovych fled the country after sealing the pact with the opposition and foreign ministers of France, German and Poland to hold early elections and surrender many powers.


“Instead of a promised national unity government,” Lavrov said, “a ‘government of the victors’ has been created.”


Then came dramatic claims from Ukraine that Russian troops had issued an ultimatum for two Ukrainian warships to surrender or be seized — prompting Ukraine’s acting president to accuse Russia of “piracy.”


Four Russian navy ships in Sevastopol’s harbor were blocking Ukraine’s corvette Ternopil and the command ship Slavutych, Ukrainian authorities said. Acting president Oleksandr Turchynov said commanders and crew were “ready to defend their ships … They are defending Ukraine.”


Vladimir Anikin, a Russian defense ministry spokesman in Moscow, dismissed the report of a Russian ultimatum as nonsense but refused to elaborate.


It was not clear what the West could do to make Russia back down. The clearest weapon at the disposal of the EU and U.S. appeared to be economic sanctions that would freeze Russian assets and pull the plug on multi-billion dollar deals with Russia. Late Monday, the EU threatened to freeze visa liberalization and economic cooperation talks and boycott the G8 summit in Russia if Moscow does not climb down on Crimean peninsula by the Thursday summit.


Already the economic fallout for Russia over its Crimea takeover was being intensely felt: Russia’s stock market dropped about 10 percent on Monday and its currency fell to its lowest point ever against the dollar. But the economic consequences of antagonizing Russia were also acute for Western Europe: The EU relies heavily on Russian natural gas flowing through a network of Ukrainian and other pipelines.


By Monday it was clear that Russia had effectively turned Crimea into a protectorate.


Russian soldiers controlled all Crimean border posts Monday, as well as all military facilities in the territory. Troops also controlled a ferry terminal in the Ukrainian city of Kerch, just 20 kilometers (12 miles) across the water from Russia. That intensified fears in Kiev that Moscow will send even more troops into the peninsula via that route.


Border guard spokesman Sergei Astakhov said the Russians were demanding that Ukrainian soldiers and guards transfer their allegiance to Crimea’s new pro-Russian local government.


“The Russians are behaving very aggressively,” he said. “They came in by breaking down doors, knocking out windows, cutting off every communication.”


He said four Russian military ships, 13 helicopters and 8 transport planes had arrived in Crimea in violation of agreements that permit Russian to keep its Black Sea fleet at the naval base in Sevastopol. The agreement limits the deployment of additional forces at the base.


Ukraine’s prime minister admitted his country had “no military options on the table” to reverse Russia’s military move into its Crimea region. Pro-Russian soldiers surrounded Ukrainian military facilities on the peninsula, completing a military takeover without firing a single shot.


Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk appealed for outside help and said Crimea remained part of his country, as European foreign ministers held an emergency meeting on a joint response to Russia’s military push into Crimea.


“Any attempt of Russia to grab Crimea will have no success at all. Give us some time,” he said at a news conference with British Foreign Secretary Wiliam Hague.


But he added that “for today” there were “no military options on the table,” he said. He said his country was “urgently” asking for economic and political support from other countries.


The fears in the Ukrainian capital and beyond are that that Russia might seek to expand its control by seizing other parts of Ukraine in the pro-Russian east of the country, the country’s industrial powerhouse and agricultural breadbasket.


Hague said “the world cannot just allow this to happen.” But he, like other Western diplomats, ruled out any military action. “The U.K is not discussing military options. Our concentration is on diplomatic and economic pressure.”


Faced with fears of more Russian aggression, Ukraine’s new government has moved to consolidate its authority, naming new regional governors in the pro-Russia east picked among the country’s wealthy businessmen.


By putting influential oligarchs in control of key eastern provinces, Kiev appears to be hoping that Russian-leaning citizens will be more willing to remain within the Ukrainian fold.


In Geneva, Lavrov attempted to deflect international blame back onto the West.


“Those who are trying to interpret the situation as a sort of aggression and threatening us with sanctions and boycotts, these are the same partners who have been consistently and vigorously encouraging the political powers close to them to declare ultimatums and renounce dialogue,” Lavrov said.


“We call upon them to show a responsibility and to set aside geopolitical calculations and put the interests of the Ukrainian people above all.”


Lavrov on Monday justified the use of Russian troops in Ukraine as a necessary protection for his country’s citizens living there. “This is a question of defending our citizens and compatriots, ensuring human rights, especially the right to life,” Lavrov said.


Market reaction to the Russian seizure of Crimea was furious Monday. In European trading, gold and oil rose while the euro and stock markets fell. The greatest impact was felt in Moscow, where the main RTS index was down 12 percent at 1,115 and the dollar spiked to an all-time high of 37 rubles.


Russia’s central bank hiked its main interest rate 1.5 percentage points Monday to 7 percent, trying to stem financial outflows.


Gazprom, the Russian energy giant, was also big loser, its share price down 13 percent as investors worried about how it would get its gas to Europe if hostilities kept up, since much of it goes through Ukrainian pipelines.


Tension between Ukraine and Moscow rose sharply after Ukraine’s pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych was pushed out by a protest movement among people who wanted closer ties with the European Union. Yanukovych fled to Russia after more than 80 demonstrators were killed near Kiev’s central square. He says he is still president.


Putin’s confidence in his Ukraine strategy is underpinned by the knowledge that the nation’s 46 million people have divided loyalties. While much of western Ukraine wants closer ties with the 28-nation European Union, its eastern and southern regions look to Russia for support.


Crimea is where Russia feels most at home in Ukraine: It is home to 2 million mostly Russian-speaking people and landlord for Russia’s critical Black Sea Fleet at Sevastopol.


___


Bennet reported from Kerch, Ukraine. Danica Kirka in London contributed to this report.


Associated Press




Top Headlines



Russia sets Ukraine agenda with diplomacy, threats

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

CNN Distorts Study to Support Global Anti-Child Agenda


SunRev732
Planet Infowars
February 10, 2014


CNN reporter Brooke Baldwin / Screengrab taken from YouTube.

CNN reporter Brooke Baldwin / Screengrab taken from YouTube.



A misleading report by CNN inferred a causal relationship from a study that only demonstrated a correlation.

The study found that couples who did not have children were happier than couples who did. Data was obtained comparing levels of happiness of couples with children to those without children. No manipulation of variables was made by the researchers.


In this study having kids/not having kids would need to be manipulated (Independent Variable) and happiness measured (Dependent Variable) in order to draw the causal conclusion found by CNN. The journalist Brooke Baldwin concluded from the study, “Want to have a happy marriage? Then don’t have kids.”


This statement is inaccurate as it concludes the study found that having kids causes unhappiness to couples.


Such a conclusion does not follow nor is inferred from this study, because no cause and effect relationship was established (variables were not manipulated, it was not an experiment). No temporal relationship was established (ie couple was happy, –> then had kids, –> then was no longer happy). No alternative explanations have been ruled out.


There was no control for extraneous variables, so it is likely that many other factors influenced the findings. Something else could have caused both happiness level and whether a couple had kids/no kids (personality, income level, culture, etc.), the relationship may have been reversed (being happy causes couples to not have kids), etc.


Manipulating variables, establishing temporal order, accounting for extraneous variables (establishing that the effects were not caused by something else) are all required in order to conclude a causal relationship.


This report is a distortion of the facts. Correlation does not mean causation goes the mantra well known by scientists and students.


Read more


This post first appeared in the U.S. News category.


All of the views expressed are not necessarily endorsed by Infowars.com.


This article was posted: Monday, February 10, 2014 at 3:31 pm










Infowars



CNN Distorts Study to Support Global Anti-Child Agenda

80,000 March in North Carolina Proudly Pushing Back Against Radical Right Agenda

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


80,000 March in North Carolina Proudly Pushing Back Against Radical Right Agenda

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Republicans decry Obama plans to bypass Congress to advance agenda




WASHINGTON Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:29pm EST



Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) speaks to the media before his party

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) speaks to the media before his party’s working lunch on Capitol Hill in Washington October 8, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Gary Cameron




WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. President Barack Obama’s strategy to bypass Congress this year with executive orders to advance his policy agenda received a cold reaction on Sunday from Republican leaders, who accused the White House of arrogance and sidestepping the political process.


Obama and his advisers have signaled for weeks that the president would take a more active role in using his pen and phone to sign orders that do not require lawmaker approval and cajole others to back his priorities.


Senior White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer said Obama needed Congress to pass immigration reform and extend unemployment insurance but that the president would telegraph in his State of the Union address on Tuesday that he would not be patient with lawmakers in areas where he did not need them.


“The president … is not going to tell the American people that he’s going to wait for Congress,” Pfeiffer told CNN’s “State of the Union with Candy Crowley” program.


“He’s going to move forward in areas like job training, education, manufacturing, on his own to try to restore opportunity for American families,” Pfeiffer said.


Republicans, speaking ahead of the high profile Tuesday evening address, were not pleased.


“It sounds vaguely like a threat and I think it also has a certain amount of arrogance in the sense that one of the fundamental principles of our country were the checks and balances,” Republican Senator Rand Paul, a potential presidential candidate in 2016, said on the same program.


“Welcome to the real world. It’s hard to convince people to get legislation through. It takes consensus. But that’s what he needs to be doing is building consensus and not taking his pen and creating law,” he said.


Mitch McConnell, the U.S. Senate’s top Republican, said his party wanted to work with the president on free trade agreements and would be willing to extend unemployment benefits as long as doing so did not add to the national debt.


“The president has sort of hung out on a limb and tried to get what he wants through the bureaucracy as opposed to moving to the political center,” McConnell told “Fox News Sunday.”


“We’re anxious to help him create jobs, but we’re not going to go over and endorse more spending, more debt, more taxes and more regulation.”


The White House’s new strategy comes after a tough 2013 in which his legislative goals on priorities such as gun control and immigration reform died or languished in Congress. Republicans have a majority in the House of Representatives and Democrats control the Senate.


With an eye to Obama’s legacy, administration officials are eager to avoid the same fate in 2014 and have stressed that they will not judge the year’s success based on legislative achievements.


The Washington Post quoted one official saying Obama previously had governed too much like a prime minister who needed support from lawmakers and not enough like a president who could act on his own accord.


Obama plans to unveil a new plan to help people still looking for jobs in the recovering economy during his Tuesday address and will follow that up with a four-state tour on Wednesday and Thursday.


(Additional reporting by Doina Chiacu and Andy Sullivan; Editing by Jim Loney)






Reuters: Politics



Republicans decry Obama plans to bypass Congress to advance agenda

Monday, January 20, 2014

Global Depopulation Next on the Agenda of the NWO

Global Depopulation Next on the Agenda of the NWO
http://img.youtube.com/vi/BT4O3gRbCHg/0.jpg



In today’s video, Christopher Greene of AMTV explains that Depopulation is next on the Agenda of the NWO. http://www.amtvmedia.com/re-direct-global-depopulat…
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about Global Depopulation Next on the Agenda of the NWO and other interesting subjects concerning Top News Videos at TheDailyNewsReport.com

"Hidden agenda in Syria to show itself after Bilderberg meeting"

"Hidden agenda in Syria to show itself after Bilderberg meeting"
http://img.youtube.com/vi/y6XzhuN3SUw/0.jpg



Tensions are peaking in Syria, government troops have stormed the rebel northern border town of Jisr Al-Shugour with tanks and military helicopters. The army…
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about "Hidden agenda in Syria to show itself after Bilderberg meeting" and other interesting subjects concerning Top News Videos at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

AGENDA 21 Dealt a Blow In Los Angeles City

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



AGENDA 21 Dealt a Blow In Los Angeles City

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Richard Rothschild on Agenda 21

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Richard Rothschild on Agenda 21

Saturday, October 26, 2013

What is Agenda 21?



Agenda 21 is a product of the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, and it is the means by which Americans may soon be saddled with lower living standards. Agenda 21 is imp…
Video Rating: 4 / 5



What is Agenda 21?

Friday, October 18, 2013

No safe bets for Obama despite toned-down agenda







In this Oct. 17, 2013, photo, President Barack Obama speaks in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington. Regrouping after a feud with Congress stalled his agenda, Obama is laying down a three-item to-do list for Congress that seems meager when compared to the bold, progressive agenda he envisioned at the start of his second term. But given the capital’s partisanship, the complexities of the issues and the limited time left, even those items – immigration, farm legislation and a budget – amount to ambitious goals that will take political muscle, skill and ever-elusive compromise to execute. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)





In this Oct. 17, 2013, photo, President Barack Obama speaks in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington. Regrouping after a feud with Congress stalled his agenda, Obama is laying down a three-item to-do list for Congress that seems meager when compared to the bold, progressive agenda he envisioned at the start of his second term. But given the capital’s partisanship, the complexities of the issues and the limited time left, even those items – immigration, farm legislation and a budget – amount to ambitious goals that will take political muscle, skill and ever-elusive compromise to execute. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — Regrouping after a feud with Congress stalled his agenda, President Barack Obama is laying down a three-item to-do list for Congress that seems meager when compared with the bold, progressive agenda he envisioned at the start of his second term.


But given the capital’s partisanship, the complexities of the issues and the limited time left, even those items — immigration, farm legislation and a budget — amount to ambitious goals that will take political muscle, skill and ever-elusive compromise to execute.


“Those are three specific things that would make a huge difference in our economy right now,” Obama said. “And we could get them done by the end of the year if our focus is on what’s good for the American people.”


A breakthrough on any of the three issues would be a welcome development for a political system whose utter dysfunction was put on full display when the government was partially shut down for 16 days and the nation came perilously close to default. Both parties are looking for signs of whether that squabble and its eleventh-hour resolution will make it easier or harder for the two parties to find common ground in the future.


Still, the scaled-back vision for what might be feasible in the short term could be disappointing for Obama’s liberal supporters, who have been looking expectantly to the president to enact as much of his agenda as possible before Washington is consumed next year by midterm elections and the end of Obama’s presidency draws nearer.


Obama began the year calling for gun control legislation, expanded preschool education, an immigration overhaul, a higher minimum wage and for initiatives to address climate change. But like other moments in Obama’s presidency, fierce interparty divisions and fiscal showdowns have at times overwhelmed the capital and sapped it of any energy to move on other legislation.


Obama’s gun control push, spurred by a shocking elementary school shooting in Connecticut, collapsed in the Senate. And immigration legislation attracted bipartisan support in the Senate but has stalled in the Republican-led House, a blow to Obama’s hopes that Republicans would be motivated to support it after losing the Hispanic vote by wide margins in 2012.


Meanwhile, legislative efforts to increase wages, expand access to pre-K schools and reduce pollution have been nonstarters in the divided Congress.


White House spokesman Jay Carney said Obama will continue to press other priorities such as college affordability, gun control and climate change, where the president has resorted to executive action after determining Congress was unlikely to act. But he said achieving a bipartisan budget deal or an immigration overhaul would represent no small accomplishments for the country.


“There’s no question they’re all difficult, given the current environment,” Carney said, adding that “the president is not at all convinced by the skeptics who say that we can’t get things done.”


By focusing on the budget, immigration and the farm bill, which combines agriculture policy with anti-hunger measures, Obama chose three heavy lifts that are already in the congressional pipeline. Yet each is fraught with difficulties, and chances of success for each one are limited.


“This White House hasn’t really demonstrated that it can walk and chew gum any more than Congress has,” said William Galston, a Brookings Institution scholar and former Clinton administration official.


Even in the first hours after the government shutdown ended and Democrats and Republicans opened budget negotiations, fault lines were beginning to emerge that could lead to deadlock if both sides adhere strictly to their previous positions. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., rejected the possibility that Democrats might agree to cuts to entitlement programs in exchange for relief from automatic spending cuts.


In exchange for entitlement cuts, Reid said, Republicans would have to agree to higher taxes — setting up an eerily familiar ideological clash between the two parties now charged with reaching consensus on a budget. Republicans will face intense pressure in their districts not to raise taxes, while Democrats will press Obama not to chip away at the nation’s safety net.


“If he buys into the idea that cutting Social Security benefits or cutting Medicare benefits is going to improve the economy, that’s a disaster for him and it’s a disaster for his party,” said Roger Hickey, co-director of the liberal advocacy group Campaign for America’s Future.


Republicans are smarting from a failed strategy that exposed deep GOP divisions, potentially giving Obama a temporary upper hand.


Further complicating the chances for any legislative successes this year is the poisoned atmosphere created by the recent fiscal standoff. House Republicans in particular bristled at Obama’s refusal to negotiate on the debt ceiling and at his belittling view of House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.


“This recent fight has spoiled the opportunity for getting anything major done by the rest of the year,” said Ron Bonjean, a former top House and Senate Republican leadership aide. “There are a lot of hard feelings.”


But at least publicly, both sides are downplaying the notion that bad blood will preclude important deals in the weeks to come.


“If your punditry suggests finding big agreements is hindered by a bad relationship” between Obama and Boehner, “you’re doing it wrong,” Boehner’s spokesman, Brendan Buck, wrote Friday on Twitter.


“Agree,” Carney replied.


___


Follow Josh Lederman on Twitter at http://twitter.com/joshledermanAP and Jim Kuhnhenn at http://twitter.com/jkuhnhenn


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



No safe bets for Obama despite toned-down agenda

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Maddow: GOP Returns To Government Shutdown Agenda


Congressman Frank Pallone talks with Rachel Maddow about the determination of House Republicans to shut down the government, despite widespread bipartisan disapproval by the American people.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Maddow: GOP Returns To Government Shutdown Agenda

Maddow: GOP Returns To Government Shutdown Agenda


Congressman Frank Pallone talks with Rachel Maddow about the determination of House Republicans to shut down the government, despite widespread bipartisan disapproval by the American people.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Maddow: GOP Returns To Government Shutdown Agenda

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

The Agenda Of The New World Order (NWO) For The Next 4 years

Our New World Order Update:



Lindsey Williams, who has been an ordained Baptist minister for 28 years, went to Alaska in 1971 as a missionary. The Transalaska oil pipeline began its cons…



The Agenda Of The New World Order (NWO) For The Next 4 years

Saturday, September 7, 2013

Syria, budget and debt top congressional agenda







The Capitol is seen in Washington, early Thursday, Sept. 5, 2013, as Congress considers President Barack Obama’s request for authorization of military intervention in Syria in response to last month’s alleged sarin gas attack in the Syrian civil war. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





The Capitol is seen in Washington, early Thursday, Sept. 5, 2013, as Congress considers President Barack Obama’s request for authorization of military intervention in Syria in response to last month’s alleged sarin gas attack in the Syrian civil war. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev. makes his way to the Senate floor on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Sept. 6, 2013, to introduce a resolution to authorize military action to support President Barack Obama’s request for a strike against Syria. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





Graphic shows breakdown of likely votes in House and Senate for Syria strike resolution; 3c x 4 inches; 146 mm x 101 mm;





Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, speaks with reporters as she leaves a briefing by national security officials on the situation in Syria, at the Capitol, in Washington, Friday, Sept. 6, 2013. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





The Senate Foreign Relations Committee room is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 5, 2013, as Congress considers President Barack Obama’s request for authorization of military intervention in Syria in response to last month’s alleged sarin gas attack in the Syrian civil war. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — Congress returns to work facing a momentous vote on whether the United States should attack Syria, a question that overshadows a crowded and contentious agenda of budget fights, health care, farm policy and possible limits on the government’s surveillance of millions of Americans.


Back Monday after a five-week break, many lawmakers stand as a major obstacle to President Barack Obama’s promised strikes against Syria amid fears of U.S. involvement in an extended Mideast war and public fatigue after more than a decade of conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.


Obama insists the world must act. He blames Syrian President Bashar Assad for gassing his own people, killing 1,429 civilians, including 426 children. The Syrian government has denied responsibility for the Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack outside Damascus, and blames rebels.


On Wednesday, the 12th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the first showdown Senate vote is likely over a resolution authorizing the “limited and specified use” of U.S. armed forces against Syria for no more than 90 days and barring American ground troops from combat. A final vote in the 100-member chamber is expected at week’s end.


“I think we’re going to get 60 votes. It’s a work in progress,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Friday.


Support for the president is stronger in the Senate than in the Republican-controlled House. There, Obama faces a difficult path to victory despite the backing of Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., and Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California for military strikes.


The Syria vote poses a dilemma for Obama’s Democratic allies in Congress. Many strongly opposed the war in Iraq but are reluctant to undercut a president from their own party. The crucial player is Pelosi, a proven vote-getter.


“A lot of members have constituents who have not been persuaded and I think a part of that inability to be persuaded is that they’re thinking about Iraq,” Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said Friday after one of many classified briefings for lawmakers. “That’s what I’m hearing in my district even from people who are extremely supportive of the president.”


Senior administration officials will speak to lawmakers in advance of the president’s speech to the nation Tuesday night.


A House vote is likely the week of Sept. 16.


Even before Syria, Congress faced a busy and difficult fall packed with battles.


Obama and his allies in the Democratic-run Senate face fights from House Republicans over bills to fund government agencies and raise the ceiling on federal borrowing to avert a market-rattling government default. Then there are efforts by conservatives to cut off money for Obama’s health care law, with open enrollment for health insurance exchanges beginning Oct. 1.


After Syria, Congress’s most immediate task is passing a temporary spending bill to prevent much of the government from shutting down on the Oct. 1 start of the new budget year.


The stopgap measure would buy time to work out funding government programs over the next 12 months, but even its passage is in doubt.


Republicans are divided over whether to use the measure as a last-ditch assault on Obama’s expansion of federally subsidized medical care and new requirement that millions of people without health insurance either buy it or pay penalties to the Internal Revenue Service.


GOP leaders eager to avoid an impasse and government shutdown prefer a straightforward temporary spending bill that would keep agencies running at current budget levels reflecting the imposition of the automatic, across-the-board spending cuts in place for the past six months. But to pass it, they probably will need votes from Democrats unhappy that higher taxes aren’t also on the table.


Congressional Democrats and the White House are eager to reverse the cuts, and many defense hawk Republicans would like to as well. But there have been no fruitful negotiations between the White House and House GOP leaders.


Negotiations between White House officials and a small group of Senate Republicans collapsed last month over familiar disagreements over tax increases and cuts to popular federal benefit programs.


Without a deal, those automatic spending cuts could become entrenched through all of next year and possibly into the next several years.


A 2011 agreement called for a total budget of $ 1.058 trillion next year to operate federal agencies. The automatic spending cuts triggered by failing to follow up with further deficit cuts by curbing benefit increases, raising taxes or both would pare that figure by $ 91 billion, to $ 967 billion for the 2014 budget year.


A comparable spending figure for the soon-to-be-completed 2013 budget year is about $ 988 billion, with the approximately $ 20 billion in additional defense cuts.


House Armed Services Committee Chairman Howard “Buck” McKeon, R-Calif., says many Republicans on his committee want to reverse the defense cuts as a condition for voting for the resolution authorizing military strikes on Syria.


Avoiding a shutdown is just one step.


The administration says the government’s ability to fully pay all its bills, including interest payments to bondholders and Social Security benefits, will run out some time in October unless Congress raises the $ 16.7 trillion cap on its borrowing authority.


That legislation could be even more vexing because Boehner and tea party Republicans see it as leverage to force further spending cuts or other GOP priorities into law.


Obama agreed in 2011 to Boehner’s demand that spending cuts equal the size of the debt limit increase, but the president says he won’t do it again. Republican leaders say such a “clean” debt limit increase Obama wants is a nonstarter.


An immigration overhaul could get lost in the shuffle.


The Senate in June passed a broad bill that would allow millions of immigrants now in the country illegally to stay, work and eventually acquire citizenship. House Republicans reject what they call a special path to citizenship in the Senate bill and favor a piecemeal approach that begins with better securing U.S. borders before excusing most people who entered the country illegally or overstayed their visas from being deported.


Revelations this summer about the National Security Agency’s spying prompted demands from some in Congress to rein in the programs; a series of hearings is scheduled. Leaders of the House and Senate intelligence committees face pressure from lawmakers to make changes to NSA surveillance in the longstanding authorization bills.


Lawmakers also are pushing for major changes in how the military handles cases of sexual assault in their ranks. A significant number of lawmakers want to remove commanders from the process of deciding whether serious crimes, including sexual misconduct cases, go to trial.


The Pentagon and some senior lawmakers reject that idea. A showdown is expected later this year when the Senate debates a defense policy bill.


Congress also will have to finish a farm bill before the end of the year if lawmakers want to avert the threat of milk prices doubling for consumers. Most of current farm law expires at the end of September, but its effects won’t be felt until the end of the year when dairy supports expire. Without the supports, milk prices are expected to rise.


____


Associated Press Writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



Syria, budget and debt top congressional agenda

Saturday, August 10, 2013

Surveillance debate intrudes into Obama"s agenda







President Barack Obama is seen reflected in a mirror during his news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Friday, Aug. 9, 2013. The president said he’ll work with Congress to change the oversight of some of the National Security Agency’s controversial surveillance programs and name a new panel of outside experts to review technologies. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)





President Barack Obama is seen reflected in a mirror during his news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Friday, Aug. 9, 2013. The president said he’ll work with Congress to change the oversight of some of the National Security Agency’s controversial surveillance programs and name a new panel of outside experts to review technologies. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)





Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, center, leaves after a news conference at Russian Embassy in Washington, Friday, Aug. 9, 2013, where he discussed his meeting with Secretary of State John Kerry over the growing discord between President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russia’s decision last week to grant temporary asylum to National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden put a damper on U.S.-Russia relations, prompting President Obama to cancel a planned one-on-one meeting with President Putin in a month. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — For President Barack Obama, August was supposed to be the month a sweeping immigration bill landed on his desk. There was hope for movement on a grand deficit deal with Republicans, and in the optimistic early days of his second term, even a belief that Obama would have already achieved stricter gun laws.


Instead, Obama finds his fifth year in office beset by distractions — perhaps none with broader domestic and foreign policy implications than the revelation of secret government surveillance programs. The matter dominated Obama’s hourlong news conference Friday, with the issues the White House had hoped to be promoting this summer either playing a diminished role or none at all.


The president set the tone, opening the question-and-answer session by announcing that he would work with Congress to make “appropriate reforms” to the National Security Agency surveillance programs, while also making clear he had no intention of stopping the daily collection of Americans’ phone records.


“Given the history of abuse by governments, it’s right to ask questions about surveillance, particularly as technology is reshaping every aspect of our lives,” he said, one day before leaving for a weeklong vacation with his family on Martha’s Vineyard.


Even without the NSA revelations, Obama would still be facing the same political dynamic with congressional Republicans that stalled progress on immigration, squashed hope for a grand bargain and defeated gun control and a host of other administration priorities. And it’s a reality of any administration that unexpected challenges can arise and shake up the White House’s carefully laid plans.


But the sweeping scope of the surveillance disclosures leaked by former NSA systems analyst Edward Snowden means the issue is likely to be more than a temporary distraction for Obama, given the vigorous debate they have prompted on Capitol Hill and among the American public.


Obama’s poll numbers have dropped since the programs became public, which could hamper his political leverage in Washington. And advisers say privately that the surveillance revelations are particularly problematic because the issue strikes a chord with Obama’s Democratic base and can’t simply be dismissed as partisan-driven.


Seeking to address critics of the secret programs, the president on Friday acknowledged that he may have underestimated the public’s concerns. He also outlined steps that he said he hopes will increase Americans’ confidence in the programs.


Among those steps are the creation of an independent attorney to argue against the government during secret hearings of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which reviews requests for surveillance inside the U.S. He is also forming an outside advisory panel to review U.S. surveillance powers.


The president says he welcomes the ongoing debate over government surveillance, though his national security team has said it never intended to tell Americans about the highly classified programs.


Obama also acknowledged as much Friday: “There’s no doubt that Mr. Snowden’s leaks triggered a much more rapid and passionate response than would have been the case.”


While the NSA revelations have intruded on Obama’s second-term domestic agenda, they have become directly entangled with some of his foreign policy priorities. Snowden chose as his overseas hideouts Hong Kong, a semiautonomous region of China, and Russia — countries with complex and sometimes prickly relationships with the United States.


Russia granted Snowden temporary asylum, prompting Obama to cancel plans to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow in September. While relations with the U.S. and Russia had already been deteriorating, the Kremlin’s decision on Snowden pushed them to a new low and underscored Russia’s willingness to thwart the White House’s demands.


Leaders in Europe, where many countries have stricter privacy laws than in the U.S., have also criticized the surveillance problems. Obama has been pressed on the issue in meetings and phone calls with the continent’s leaders.


The president on Friday appeared keenly aware of how the international community was viewing the surveillance and privacy debate in the U.S.


“To others around the world, I want to make clear once again that America is not interested in spying on ordinary people,” he said. “Our intelligence is focused above all on finding the information that’s necessary to protect our people and, in many cases, protect our allies.”


The issue of government surveillance had been largely dormant until June, when stories broke in Britain’s Guardian newspaper and The Washington Post detailing secret programs to track U.S. phone and Internet records. Details of the programs had been leaked by Snowden.


Every day, the NSA sweeps up the phone records of all Americans. The program was authorized under the USA Patriot Act, which Congress hurriedly passed after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The NSA says phone records are the only information it collects in bulk under that law. But officials have left open the possibility that it could create similar databases of people’s credit card transactions, hotel records and Internet searches.


___


Follow Julie Pace at http://twitter.com/jpaceDC


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



Surveillance debate intrudes into Obama"s agenda