Showing posts with label Dump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dump. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Cops and Feds Routinely ‘Dump’ Cell Towers to Track Everyone Nearby





Photo: barryskeates/Flickr



The nation’s mobile phone carriers received more than 9,000 requests last year for cell-tower dumps, which identify every mobile phone at a particular location and time, often by the thousands.


The revelation, revealed in a congressional inquiry, underscore that domestic authorities, from the FBI to the local police, are performing a massive amount of surveillance on Americans on domestic soil sometimes without probable-cause warrants.


Figures provided by the nation’s largest carriers T-Mobile, Sprint, Verizon and AT&T, and smaller companies like C-Spire and Cricket, show that the carriers overall got as many as 1.1 million requests for customer cellular data last year. They’ve earned tens of millions of dollars processing the data, the records show.


The governments requests, most of which were honored, include data for, among other things, the geo-location of a device, call detail records, texts message contents, voicemail, cell tower dumps, wiretapping, subscriber information, and websites visited.


But the most startling figures show that the authorities are obtaining information on the whereabouts of perhaps thousands of people at once, often by a judge’s signature based on assurances from the authorities that the data is relevant to an investigation.


A myriad of factors determine how many people are caught in the web of one of these so-called “cell-tower dumps” or “searches,” including the time, location and a mobile-phone tower’s capacity. The data from a dump can provide a wealth of information regarding whoever is carrying a mobile phone in a tower’s area — from the phone number to various device information pointed to a phone’s account.


According to Verizon: (.pdf)


Although we do not specifically track the details of each tower request, our experience is that we typically receive requests for less than 30 minutes (e.g., where law enforcement is already able to pinpoint the time of a crime). But we also receive requests covering more than an hour (e.g., where there has been a crime spree). When we receive a demand for a longer period, cognizant that the cell tower dump will contain many mobile device numbers, we will often ask law enforcement to narrow the scope of the time period or accept reports run for shorter, incremental periods, even if the longer time period was approved by a judge. The number of mobile device numbers per cell tower dump depends on many factors including the location of the tower and the time day. A major event (like the Boston Marathon) may lead to a substantial increase in the number of mobile device numbers communicating with a tower at a given time.



Sprint said it “provided approximately 6,000 cell tower searches (.pdf) to law enforcement agencies.” T-Mobile did not answer the question.


The responses were released today as part of an inquiry by Sen. Edward Markey (D-Massachusetts).


“As law enforcement uses new technology to protect the public from harm, we also must protect the information of innocent Americans from misuse, said Markey, who is a member of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee. “We need a 4th amendment for the 21st century. Disclosure of personal information from wireless devices raises significant legal and privacy concerns, particularly for innocent consumers. That is why I plan to introduce legislation so that Americans can have confidence that their information is protected and standards are in place for the retention and disposal of this sensitive data.”


The disclosures come amid revelations from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden that National Security Agency snoops are harvesting as many as 5 billion records daily, without warrants, to track mobile phones as they ping nearby cell towers across the globe.


The law on cell-site locational tracking — while generally favorable to the government — is far from clear. Courts are offering mixed rulings on whether warrants are needed, and the Supreme Court has yet to take a case to resolve the issue.


Markey’s proposed legislation, which he is expected to drop within the coming weeks, would require probable-cause warrants for mobile-phone location tracking “to believe it will uncover evidence of a crime. This is the traditional standard for police to search individual homes.”


Chris Calabrese, the legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said: “The idea that police can obtain such a rich treasure trove of data about any one of us without appropriate judicial oversight should send shivers down our spines. There is an easy fix to part of this problem – President Obama and members of Congress should pass legislation that updates our outdated privacy laws by requiring law enforcement to get a probable cause warrant before service providers disclose the contents of our electronic communications to the government. Anything less is unnecessarily invasive and un-American.”


The figures, meanwhile, while showing that the carriers are all over the map in terms of whether warrants are required for dumps, also reveal that the carriers keep the data for differing time periods, too. For example, U.S. Cellular and Verizon keeps cell-tower data for a year. T-Mobile (.pdf)  and Sprint retain it for 180 days and AT&T five years. Markey would like to see a nationwide, uniform approach to that.


AT&T said the average cell-tower dump was 80 minutes. (.pdf) The company said it charged $ 10.3 million last year furnishing thousands of request for data to the authorities last year. Verizon, which reported 2,400 tower dumps, said it charged “less than” $ 5 million last year to comply with all government demands for customer and cell-site monitoring.




Threat Level



Cops and Feds Routinely ‘Dump’ Cell Towers to Track Everyone Nearby

Friday, November 29, 2013

Sea Hosting 100-Million Year-Old Species to be Site of Syrian Chemical Weapons Stockpile Dump


(Photo: Wikimedia Commons)Intellihub – by  Shepard Ambellas


The OPCW is now claiming they have a “technically feasible” plan to dump chemical weapons into the Mediterranean Sea reports say.


In what can only be described as a really bad idea, the organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) is planning to destroy at least 1000 tones of the confiscated Syrian chemical weapon stockpile out at sea, which some fear will destroy delicate eco systems vital to sea and human life alike.   


The OPCW claims the plan is “technically feasible” and is apparently willing to risk ecological disaster to destroy the toxic contents of the weaponry in or above the sea. Members of the press were told, the “group is considering whether to destroy the chemical weapons in the ocean, either on a ship or by loading them onto an offshore rig”, reported,RT.[1] If the operation is approved for a green light, the Mediterranean Sea appears as if it will be the drop point. The MV Cape Ray would be conducting the transport, according to reports.


Most of the Syrian’s chemical weapons supply is expected to be removed from the country into international custody by the year’s end. All of the remaining contents are scheduled to be removed by mid-2014.


RT.com also reported, “OPCW Director General Ahmet Umzucu said in a statement that the plan was a “clear road map” to meet the aforementioned deadline.


This next phase will be the most challenging, and its timely execution will require the existence of a secure environment for the verification and transport of chemical weapons,” he said. “Continuing international support and assistance for this endeavor will remain crucial.”


When Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama said no to the request – citing “no capacity of any kind pertaining to the transport and technological processes involved” – he outlined many of the same problems that the OPCW and UN must now consider.


Any action will certainly need to be more intricate than when the Japanese government destroyed weapons leftover from World War II in 2004-2006. In doing so, the Japanese set up a disposal plant on a floating platform.


The Syrian weapons will produce liquid waste that those Japanese weapons did not. It also makes hydrolysis, a neutralization process that involves adding water to the chemical, much less likely.


If you use hydrolysis or incineration, there will be liquid waste,” Ralf Trapp, an independent chemical disarmament specialist, told Reuters. “So there will be problems with regard to environmental pollution that need to be addressed.”[1] 


Which ever way you slice it, the eco systems of the Mediterranean Sea would be at risk if the chemical stockpile was indeed destroyed in the waters. According to the World Wildlife Federation (WWF) “The Mediterranean is an enclosed sea with the world’s second highest percentage of endemic species, including the Posidonia sea grass and the critically endangered Mediterranean monk seal.


Species also include 28 cetaceans, the 100-million year old loggerhead turtle, and the commercially important blue-fin tuna and swordfish. 

Currently, less than 1% of the Mediterranean Sea is protected.


We are working to establish marine and coastal protected areas to protect the most important regions for biodiversity. We promote fisheries management systems which do not adversely affect marine productivity. We also try to ensure that measures against pollution agreed in international conventions, such as the Barcelona Convention, are endorsed and implemented.


WWF Mediterranean works at a pan-Mediterranean level, and also focuses efforts on marine regions in Croatia , Libya , Morocco , Tunisia and Turkey. [...]


The Mediterranean hosts several endangered marine species:


  • the monk seal (Monachus monachus), of which about 350 – 400 now survive in the world.

  • the green turtle (Chelonia mydas) and the 100-million year old loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta), which nest on Mediterranean beaches.

  • 18 cetacean species, of which seven can be observed throughout the year: the pilot whale, fin whale, sperm whale, common dolphin, striped dolphin, bottlenose dolphin and the Risso’s dolphin.

  • the endemic sea-grass Posidonia oceanica , which plays a crucial role in coast protection by acting as a buffer to currents and waves.[4]

Environmental activists will likely soon emerge protesting the proposed actions of the OPCW.



Sources:


[1] Syrian chemical weapons likely to be destroyed at sea – report – RT.com


[2] US Could Destroy Syria’s Chemical Arms In Med – NewsSky.com


[3] Mediterranean Sea large marine ecosystem – EOEarth.org


[4] Marine environment: the Mediterranean sea and its coasts - Mediterranean.Panda.org/


http://intellihub.com/2013/11/29/sea-hosting-100-million-year-old-species-to-be-site-of-syrian-chemical-weapons-stockpile-dump/






Sea Hosting 100-Million Year-Old Species to be Site of Syrian Chemical Weapons Stockpile Dump