Showing posts with label East. Show all posts
Showing posts with label East. Show all posts

Monday, April 7, 2014

Separatist passions reignite in Ukraine’s east




MOSCOW, Russia — Pro-Russian activists have stormed key administration buildings in several of Ukraine’s Russian-speaking eastern regions in an apparently coordinated action that’s renewed fears about a growing tide of separatism.


As of Monday evening, protesters reportedly controlled the state security buildings in Donetsk and Luhansk — the capitals of two heavily industrialized regions in the country’s east — as well as the regional administration building in Donetsk.


More than 100 separatists who seized that office declared a separatist “People’s Republic of Donetsk” and are demanding a Crimea-style referendum within a month on secession from Ukraine.


They also called for Moscow to deploy a “peacekeeping contingent” if the Kyiv government moves to restore order there, Reuters reported.


The news follows weeks of simmering separatist sentiments in the largely pro-Russian east, where the country’s new authorities have attempted to crack down on separatism but are still struggling to reassert their authority.


Until late Sunday, when the protesters stormed buildings in Donetsk, Luhansk and Kharkiv, another major city, the anti-Kyiv protests in eastern Ukraine — where resentment against the new pro-Western government remains strong — had largely died down.


Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk on Monday slammed the events as a Moscow-orchestrated provocation aimed at destabilizing Ukraine.


“An anti-Ukrainian plan is being put into operation… under which foreign troops will cross the border and seize the country’s territory,” he said at an emergency cabinet meeting, news agencies reported. “We will not allow this.”


Ukraine’s security service, the SBU, said on Monday that it had arrested a suspected Russian intelligence officer two days earlier who had been coordinating a separatist movement in Luhansk.


Several leading Ukrainian officials were dispatched to the country’s east in an effort to stabilize the situation.


Although the Russian authorities have denied stoking separatist sentiment in Ukraine, the government in Kyiv has consistently claimed that Russian “tourists” — bussed into eastern Ukraine to stir protests — have played a key role in supporting unrest.


A local journalist in Kharkiv reported on Sunday that separatist protesters there had initially stormed the local opera theater after mistaking it for the city hall in an apparent sign the activists were unfamiliar with the city.


Meanwhile, Russian state media — which have helped fuel discontent with the Kyiv authorities in Ukraine’s east through a heavy-handed propaganda campaign — provided extensive evening news coverage of the events in Donetsk.


More from GlobalPost: Here’s why the US and Russia would be MAD to go to war


Tens of thousands of Russian troops remain massed near the Ukrainian border, feeding international fears that the Kremlin has been preparing to seize Ukraine’s eastern regions much as it did with Crimea last month.


Russian officials have sought to assuage those concerns, with a top Russian senator saying on Monday that his country would be unable to send peacekeepers into eastern Ukraine without approval from the United Nations.


“Russia has no right to do this unilaterally,” said Viktor Ozerov, head of the Federation Council’s defense and security committee, the news agency Interfax reported.


Also on Monday, a Ukrainian military officer was shot and killed in Crimea — seized by Russia in late February and annexed last month — after an alleged confrontation with his Russian counterparts. 


http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/europe/140407/ukraine-east-russia-separatist-passions




GlobalPost – Regions



Separatist passions reignite in Ukraine’s east

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

WW3 Update: Ukrainian Troops Head For Crimea, Russian Troops Head Towards East Ukraine (Video)

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



WW3 Update: Ukrainian Troops Head For Crimea, Russian Troops Head Towards East Ukraine (Video)

After Annexing Crimea, Russian Troops Are Piling Up By The East Ukraine Border

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



After Annexing Crimea, Russian Troops Are Piling Up By The East Ukraine Border

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

STEVE QUAYLE: The Dangers of Continued Middle East Meddling

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



STEVE QUAYLE: The Dangers of Continued Middle East Meddling

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

ELECTRICAL GRID BLACKOUT Next RED FLAG ATTACK on the U S East Coast..The ELITE need another 9 11

At Those Damn Liars, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Those Damn Liars and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Those Damn Liars makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Those Damn Liars does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Those Damn Liars.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Those Damn Liars and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Those Damn Liars send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Those Damn Liars has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Those Damn Liars"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


ELECTRICAL GRID BLACKOUT Next RED FLAG ATTACK on the U S East Coast..The ELITE need another 9 11

Saudi Arabia warns it will act against West’s policy in Middle East


The comments come as Syria opposition officials report that Western diplomats have privately said that next month’s peace talks may not lead to the removal of President Bashar al-Assad from power. At a summit of opposition backers in London last week, the opposition was told that the transistional arrangements must preserve key parts of the current regime.


“Our Western friends made it clear in London that Assad cannot be allowed to go now because they think chaos and an Islamist militant takeover would ensue,” said one senior member of the opposition said.


High level warnings from Saudi royals over the West’s betrayal of previously shared foreign policy goals have also included demands for the Gulf countries to have a seat at negotiations with Iran over its nuclear programme.


Prince Turki al-Faisal, a former head of Saudi intelligence, said Riyadh felt the US and its allies had worked behind its back to achieve a diplomatic accord with Iran.


“It is important for us to sit down at the same table,” he said. “We have been absent.”


Prince Turki added that the US had “given the impression” it would take actions against Syria but had subsequently not delivered.


Saudi Arabia still expects its allies to challenge the two regimes over the bloodshed in Syria but is finding that West is refused to take action, Prince Mohammad added. As a result Saudi Arabia would take its own approach to the conflict, and orchestrate its own financial and miltary strategy of support to the Syrian rebels.


“To do otherwise is to walk on by, while a humanitarian disaster and strategic failure continue to fester,” Prince Mohammad wrote.


Julian Barnes-Dacey, a Syria expert at the European Council for Foreign Relations, said the Saudi leadership viewed support for the Syrian rebels and overthrow of the Iranian-aligned Syrian regime as vital for its own security. “There is broad consensus on the need to push hard on Syria because they don’t want the Iranians to gain the upper hand,” he said. “Saudi Arabia is upping its game to help the rebels on the ground. This is not just empty talk but is an appeal to the West to stand alongside them as they look to change the end game.”


Nawaf Obaid, an advisor to Prince Mohammad, accused America of dishonesty late last month as Riyadh reacted furiously in the wake of the Geneva agreement with Iran to negotiate over nuclear weapons. “We were lied to, things were hidden from us,” he said. “The problem is not with the deal struck in Geneva, but how it was done.” Mr Obaid said the country was adopting a new “defence doctrine” that to pursue its foreign policy goals.


“Our strategic posture is moving from reactive to proactive, we have a new defence policy,” he said.


The American rush to embrace detente with Tehran resulted in a landmark interim deal last month that put the country’s nuclear programme on hold in return for some easing of sanctions.


Mohammad Javid, Iran’s foreign minister, has said the new diplomatic opening raise the prospect that the 30-year breach in diplomatic relations with Washington could be healed by talks.


The nervous Gulf states have warned that Iran remains a destructive force in the Middle East and will use a thaw as cover for its support for terrorist groups and militias across the region.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/saudiarabia/10524721/Saudi-Arabia-warns-it-will-act-against-Wests-policy-in-Middle-East.html






Saudi Arabia warns it will act against West’s policy in Middle East

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Storms upending some holiday travel on East Coast

Storms upending some holiday travel on East Coast
http://thedailynewsreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/492a8__?media=photo&contentId=93995a81f6aa4e27440f6a706700e434&fmt=jpg&Role=Preview&reldt=2013-11-27T14:21:37GMT&authToken=eNoFwrENwCAMBMCJLD3Gb2bOCYawIJLqUKRg2burvrm96pTenEABAteZ8zs2eyRpPtVWJLQ8ywxSvgASzrds87lQQ4TH2fXkhLY.jpg







Travelers wait in line to check in at the Los Angeles International Airport on Wednesday, Nov. 27, 2013, in Los Angeles. More than 43 million people are to travel over the long holiday weekend, according to AAA. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)





Travelers wait in line to check in at the Los Angeles International Airport on Wednesday, Nov. 27, 2013, in Los Angeles. More than 43 million people are to travel over the long holiday weekend, according to AAA. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)





A man sleeps at the Los Angeles International Airport on Wednesday, Nov. 27, 2013, in Los Angeles. More than 43 million people are to travel over the long holiday weekend, according to AAA. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)





Passengers board a BoltBus during a light rain, Wednesday, Nov. 27, 2013 in New York. A wall of storms packing ice, sleet and rain could upend holiday travel plans as millions of Americans take to the roads, skies and rails Wednesday for Thanksgiving. So far, the deadly storms barreling into the mid-Atlantic and Northeast have not resulted in many flight delays or cancellations, but forecasters were expecting the weather to worsen throughout the day. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)





Tara Fitzsimons, a 20-year-old student who is traveling to Chicago, reads a book on her iPad while waiting in line to check in at the Los Angeles International Airport on Wednesday, Nov. 27, 2013, in Los Angeles. More than 43 million people are to travel over the long holiday weekend, according to AAA. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)





Passengers wait for a BoltBus to arrive during a light rain, Wednesday, Nov. 27, 2013 in New York. A wall of storms packing ice, sleet and rain could upend holiday travel plans as millions of Americans take to the roads, skies and rails Wednesday for Thanksgiving. So far, the deadly storms barreling into the mid-Atlantic and Northeast have not resulted in many flight delays or cancellations, but forecasters were expecting the weather to worsen throughout the day. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — Bands of heavy rain, ice and snow were upending some holiday travel plans on the East Coast as millions of Americans took to the roads, skies and rails Wednesday for Thanksgiving, but the wintry mix was not causing the widespread gridlock that had been feared.


So far, the storms barreling over the mid-Atlantic and Northeast have not sent flight delays or cancellations rippling out beyond the region to other parts of the nation’s air network, and forecasters said the storm would start to loosen its grip on the East Coast as the day wore on.


“Yes, I’m worried,” said Sylvia Faban, an 18-year-old college freshman waiting to launch into the heart of the wintry mess in New York from Chicago, where skies were a clear crystal blue. She and a few travel buddies could do little more than slump down on top of their bags at O’Hare International Airport and wait.


“I’m checking the weather in New York,” she said as her fingers pecked at her smartphone.


As of early Wednesday, more than 230 flights to, from or within the United States had been canceled, according to the air tracking website FlightAware.com. Most of the scrapped flights were in or out of three major Northeast hubs: Newark Liberty International, Philadelphia International and LaGuardia.


Some of the longest delays were affecting Philadelphia-bound flights, which were being held up at their points of origin for an average of about two hours because of the weather, according to website. The Philadelphia area was under a flood watch with 2-3 inches of rain forecast to fall before colder temperatures turn precipitation to snow.


Roads there were snarled. A multi-vehicle crash closed the westbound lanes of the Schuylkill Expressway — Interstate 76 — in the Philadelphia area after eastbound lanes were closed due to flooding on what is traditionally the year’s busiest travel day. One lane was later reopened in both directions.


The storm system that developed in the West over the weekend has been blamed in at least 11 deaths, five of them in Texas. But as the storm moved east it wasn’t as bad as feared.


A large area of rain was spreading over the Northeast and was expected to gradually move out into the Atlantic and the Canadian Maritimes as the day wore on. Wind was a concern, especially Wednesday morning in Boston. Parts of southeast New England were under a high-wind warning with the potential for wind gusts of up to 60 mph, said Chris Vaccaro, spokesman for the National Weather Service headquarters in Silver Spring, Md.


There was a residual band of snow behind the storm that, as of Wednesday morning, was stretching from western Pennsylvania to West Virginia and into parts of the southeast. It was expected to pivot into parts of the Mid-Atlantic by Wednesday night.


“This is a fairly typical storm for this time of year,” Vaccaro said. “Obviously, it’s ill-timed because you have a lot of rain and snowfall in areas where people are trying to move around town or fly or drive out of town … but fortunately, we’re at this point going to start seeing a steady improvement in conditions across the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast.”


More than 43 million people are to travel over the long holiday weekend, according to AAA. About 39 million of those will be on the roads, while more than 3 million people are expected to filter through airports. The weather could snarl takeoffs and landings at some of the busiest hubs on the East Coast, including New York, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, Boston and Charlotte, N.C.


Transportation officials advised travelers to check with their airlines and reduce speed on highways. Travel experts suggested airline passengers might be able to have penalty fees waived if they wanted to change their bookings because of the weather.


Weather woes aside, there were some things for travelers to be happy about this year. The Federal Aviation Administration last month lifted restrictions on the use of most personal electronic devices during takeoffs and landings, and some airlines, including American, have already begun allowing passengers to stay powered up from gate to gate.


“I’m always down for Wi-Fi,” said a jazzed-up Chris Reichert, a 20-year-old film student at Northwestern University who was headed from Chicago to Baltimore.


His excitement was lost in the generational gap with some older passengers such as Phyllis Dolinko, 79, of Highland Park, Ill., who was bound for LaGuardia.


“I have a cellphone (but) I really wouldn’t do that anyway,” she said of using in-flight services to browse the Web. “That’s discourteous,” she sniffed.


Her main weather concern was not that she wouldn’t be able to make it to New York City to see her family (her flight was listed on time), but rather that high winds on turkey day might prevent the city from sending up giant balloons for the parade.


Most of the country was spared by the weather, and many travelers were pre-occupied by nothing more than whether they’d make a tight connection. Travelers at O’Hare were even surprised by how quiet and orderly it was.


Others, like Pat Wilson in suburban Detroit, were just excited to set off on a new journey.


She and her immediate family have never ventured from home before for Thanksgiving, but decided to get on an Amtrak train from Dearborn to Chicago after her 9-year-old granddaughter said she really wanted to go there.


“She requested it,” said Wilson, 65, adding that the visit will almost certainly include a stop at the city’s American Girl store, a mecca for girls who are fans of the specialty dolls.


___


Associated Press Writers Don Babwin in Chicago, Jeff Karoub in Dearborn, Mich., and Kristi Eaton in Oklahoma City contributed to this report.


Associated Press




U.S. Headlines




Read more about Storms upending some holiday travel on East Coast and other interesting subjects concerning U.S. News Report at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Sunday, November 3, 2013

101 East - Sectarian Divide promo

101 East - Sectarian Divide promo
http://img.youtube.com/vi/Rrrz-DdtyGw/0.jpg



Sectarian violence between Pakistan’s Sunni and Shia communities is causing deadly attacks on hundreds of people. Can authorities stop the bloodshed.
Video Rating: 0 / 5




Read more about 101 East - Sectarian Divide promo and other interesting subjects concerning World News Videos at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

How to Lose Friends and Influence in the Middle East


The Obama administration’s foreign policy line in Egypt has been nothing short of disastrous. While the Arab Spring began as a homegrown protest movement, with thousands of foreign citizens demanding very American values, the White House has continued to firmly side with Islamist parties instead of more moderate voices. The latest step is punishing Egypt’s transitional military-led government through large cuts in U.S. aid.


The scene was one of tragic irony. As millions of Egyptians protested in Egypt’s Tahrir Square last July, those holding anti-American signs were the young, educated, and normally Western-leaning, while bearded pro-Morsi supporters carried banners praising Obama’s Egypt policy. Egypt’s young politically active generation, religiously moderate and valuing greater political freedoms, should be the generation closest to the U.S. These are the young Egyptians that flocked to hear a recently inaugurated President Obama speak in Cairo in 2009. The fact that the opposite is true shows how backwards things have become.


Four years after Obama’s famous ‘speech to the Arab world,’ Obama and America’s credibility have taken a turn for the worse in Egypt. The current anti-Americanism among Egyptians is largely due to a failure to respond effectively to the Arab Spring. Few accurately predicted the scale and momentum of the phenomenon, where grassroots protests ousted dictators in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya (the latter with a little help from the rest of the world) and destabilized authoritarian regimes to a greater or lesser extent in Bahrain, Yemen, Syria, Iran, and Morocco.


Despite the suddenness of the Arab Spring, however, the movement held great potential for the U.S. to re-engage a region where anti-American sentiment has dominated for the past decade. After 8 years of attempting unsuccessfully to force our ‘American values’ on the Middle East in Iraq and Afghanistan, the entire region suddenly seemed to rise up demanding direct democracy, freedom of speech, and economic liberty. It was a neoconservative dream come true. But following the first Egyptian election, which brought the Muslim Brotherhood to power in 2012, the Obama administration made a series of bad decisions.


How did we get here?


Shortly after Mohamed Morsi was declared President of Egypt on June 17th, 2012, it became clear that the Muslim Brotherhood was taking Egypt in the wrong direction. Three months after he was sworn in, President Morsi issued a decree conferring himself with the power to bypass his country’s judicial system and pass laws directly. He later came under fire for convicting NGO workers, including 19 Americans, of secretly working for the foreign governments and looking the other way when sectarian violence against Egyptian Christians occurred.


These troubling trends, combined with the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood refused to compromise with opposition parties and persistent political and economic instability, led millions to demand the end of Morsi’s calamitous rule last July. One would think that the United States would welcome a popular uprising against an increasingly dictatorial Morsi. However, in words and deeds, the Obama administration has made clear that its support lies with the Muslim Brotherhood, and is now punishing Egypt for deposing Morsi.


Standing with the wrong side


The White House has continually supported Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood because of their legitimate victory in the 2012 Egyptian elections, which is understandable. While Morsi did hold democratic legitimacy in the technical sense, winning a slim 51.7% of votes, it would be a stretch to make him out to be a champion of democracy. A refusal to partake in discussions with political opponents and decreeing oneself the powers of a “Pharaoh” is hardly democratic, and Morsi was and is not someone deserving of blind American support.


Anger has especially been directed to U.S. ambassador to Egypt, Anne Patterson, who discouraged street protests against the Morsi regime in June 2013 and met with senior Muslim Brotherhood officials during the country’s ‘second revolution’. Now, Patterson is in line for a promotion within the State Department.


The most recent development in American foreign policy towards Egypt is the gravest. President Obama has ordered a cut in aid for the Egyptian military to punish a government crackdown on extremist islamists. Although the prospect of paying less out to countries that hate us seems appealing to most Americans, the Egyptian military is all that is currently holding Egypt together, and to let it fall apart without U.S. aid money would most likely see Egypt fall both into chaos and outside our orbit of influence for the foreseeable future.


The risk that the military, which currently holds political power in Egypt, may never step aside for the emergence of a truly democratic state is real, but so far they have given us no reason to think this. The U.S. should give Egypt’s new set of political players at least half the chance it gave the Muslim Brotherhood, which most knew were trouble from the start.


Aaron Kovac is an EU affairs analyst currently based in Brussels, Belgium.




American Thinker



How to Lose Friends and Influence in the Middle East

Friday, September 6, 2013

Syria: Next Chapter of U.S. Shadow War in Middle East


For 12 years strong, US running “counterinsurgency air force” for allies


Julie Wilson
Infowars.com
September 6, 2013


While the world’s focus is centered on the G-20 Summit and Obama attempting to make his case to justify a war with Syria, the US military is still covertly fighting a 12-year old war in the Middle East and now parts of Africa.


According to the BBC, an estimated six more militants were killed overnight in Pakistan after two missiles were fired at a house in North Waziristan, near Afghanistan. While the strike managed to take out a senior commander of the Taliban-linked Haqqani militant network, reports also confirm an undisclosed number of civilian casualties.


Photo: Official US Navy Page via Flickr.
Photo: Official US Navy Page via Flickr.


The strike is the second this week in Pakistan, adding to the list of 322 drone strikes authorized by Obama. Statistics from the Bureau of Investigative Journalism reveal an estimated 2,513-3,595 were killed, including 407-926 civilians and 168-200 children from 2004-13.


Since the war began, following the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, the US has been utilizing the covert drone program in eight different countries.


These countries include:


  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t


• Afghanistan
• Algeria
• Iraq
• Iran
• Libya
• Somalia
• Pakistan
• Yemen


Syria may be added to the list next.


From 2002-13, nearly 60 drone strikes have been confirmed, killing an estimated 268-393 people, including 21-58 civilians and five children. Remember, these are the number of confirmed strikes and deaths, the death toll is projected to be much higher.


In Somalia, approximately ten drone strikes have been confirmed, killing an estimated 30 people. Covert operations have killed an estimated 7-14 people, including 7-42 civilians and 1-3 children.


Reviewing these numbers illustrates the US’s attitude towards murder and assassination. It highlights the absolute hypocrisy of the US wanting to initiate another war in another country on the basis of avenging the deaths of a few hundred Syrians killed via a chemical weapons attack.


Reports have continually pointed towards the Syrian rebels as the culprits for the chemical weapons attack in Syria on Aug. 21, but even if Assad had done this to his own people, how can the US justify punishing a leader who murders civilians when the US is responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent Middle Eastern men, women and children?


The US covert drone program has managed to stay incredibly secretive, and only recently has the Obama administration come under criticism for the program, with the public and US officials calling more transparency and oversight.


Experts argue the reason the program has been kept secret is because it would be in violation of an executive order signed in 1976 by President Gerald R. Ford which banned “American intelligence forces from engaging in assassination,” reported the New Yorker.


Critics say the program has progressed beyond it’s original intention. The use of the unmanned drone program was initially intended to target an individual based on a specific set of intelligence based on his or her identity, and who posed an imminent threat to the US. Now suspects are targeted based on suspicious behavior or a series of actions that might be suspicious. Sometimes the identify of that individual is unknown.


While the drone program came to prominence under Bush, Obama has drastically expanded it. A US military attack on Syria would earn Obama the title of “war president,” according to a senior Russian lawmaker. It would make him a “second George W. Bush,” said a member of the Russian Parliament.


Obama’s drone program shows no evidence of slowing down, with strikes expanding into parts of Africa to reportedly target the al-Qaeda affiliated group al Shabaab. According to the Bureau for Investigative Journalism, US operations in Somalia remain “largely a mystery” with only two confirmed strikes in 2012.


“In Yemen and Somalia, there is debate about whether the militants targeted by the U.S. are in fact plotting against the U.S. or instead fighting against their own country,” reported ProPublica. Micah Zenko, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, says the US is running “a counterinsurgency air force” for allied countries.


The US government is responsible for a massive death toll post 9/11, and instead of decelerating the wars, the Obama administrations intends to exacerbate more money and more military aid in an attempt to send Syrian leader al-Assad a message. An act that could push the planet into WW3.


This article was posted: Friday, September 6, 2013 at 1:55 pm


Tags: , ,









Prison Planet.com



Syria: Next Chapter of U.S. Shadow War in Middle East

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

What Role Should the U.S. Play in the Middle East?

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Martin E. Dempsey, John Kerry, Secretary of State, and Chuck Hagel, Secretary of Defense, present the administration’s case for U.S. military action against Syria. (Reuters)

On Tuesday evening, President Barack Obama boarded Air Force One, departed for Sweden and left behind a looming political disaster. Despite the endorsement of Republican and Democratic House leaders, many members of Congress remain deeply skeptical about the president’s proposal to carry out cruise missile strikes in Syria. And they should be.


A few dozen missile strikes will not alter the military balance in Syria’s civil war. They will not punish Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to the point where it moves him to the bargaining table. The Syrian autocrat is engaged in a ruthless fight for survival. Obama is not. As long as that dynamic continues, limited military action will have a limited impact.


Tomahawk cruise missiles are the latest wonder weapon to be used to lull Americans into thinking they can have war without cost. (For now, they’ve replaced drones.) In a sign of just how limited the American effort will be, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee drafted a resolution Tuesday night that would limit any military action to sixty days, with one thirty day extension.


Under the best-case scenario outlined by administration officials, American destroyers will lob a few dozen missiles at Syria late next week. Washington’s credibility will be magically restored. And there will be little pain, risk or casualties for Americans.


That is wishful thinking.


At the same time, opponents of military action on the left and right argue that we can ignore what is happening in Syria. The Sunnis who make up 70 percent of Syria’s population and their Gulf backers will give up, some argue. Or if Assad wins, a magnanimous Hezbollah and Iran will not be emboldened by his successful use of chemical weapons.


In truth, Syria is on a path to become a failed state split between Sarin-wielding Alawites and Sunni jihadists. The largest refugee crisis in the world since Vietnam will destabilize Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey and potentially ignite a regional war. And America’s true red lines — Israel’s security and the steady flow of Middle Eastern oil into the global economy — will be threatened.


A gaping hole in the president’s response to Syria is that it does not grapple with the core question: what should America’s role in the Middle East be? Defender of chemical weapons bans? Defender of oil flows? Defender of Israel and no one else?


Political realities, of course, limit what type of military action Obama can propose. War weary Americans want no part of another conflict in the Middle East. But they deserve a realistic, clear-eyed strategy in the region. President George W. Bush’s invasion-centric approach to countering militancy clearly failed. But Obama’s hands-off approach is not working either.


For six years, Obama has successfully struck a middle ground in foreign policy, using drone strikes and a time-limited troop surge in Afghanistan to appear tough but anti-war. His plan to strike Syria could be the straw that breaks the back of Obama’s split-the-difference approach.


Barring a major personal lobbying effort by the president, a skeptical House is likely to reject Obama’s request for an authorization. An ABC News poll released Tuesday found that 60 percent of Americans oppose a unilateral U.S. missile strike on Syria.


To be fair, an array of factors beyond Obama’s control have come together to turn Syria into the administration’s perfect storm. Assad’s depravity, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s cynicism and a fractious Syrian opposition make up a rogue’s gallery of stubborn opponents and unappealing allies. And the war in Iraq – which Obama opposed – has created sweeping isolationism.


Obama also has himself to blame. Traits that have been steadily building in his administration for the last several years have made Syria harder to solve.


First, it is unclear how deeply Obama, in fact, wants to act in Syria. A famously detached president seems half-engaged. Instead of Obama making impassioned speeches last week to the American people, Secretary of State John Kerry did. After making a surprise announcement on Saturday that he would seek a congressional authorization to strike Syria, Obama went golfing.


Tracking the president’s personal involvement in the debate ahead will show his true intent. If Kerry, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and others remain the primary administration voices lobbying Congress, it is a sign of Obama’s ambivalence.


In an ominous sign for the White House, opposition to the strikes is growing on the far right and left. Lead by Senators Rand Paul and Ted Cruz, libertarians say no vital U.S. interests are at stake in Syria. Citing Iraq, liberals who enjoy generous security and rights at home blithely dismiss the idea of enforcing international norms abroad.


As historian Douglas Brinkley noted, one of the oddest things about the American response to Assad’s chemical weapons attack is the lack of moral outrage. Beyond Kerry, few Americans have expressed anger at a barbaric attack that killed 1,400 people, including 400 children. Yes, we must not repeat the mistakes of Iraq. But that does not absolve us from seriously grappling with the nightmarish scenarios that are emerging in the Middle East.


There are no quick or easy solutions in Syria. Even if the U.S. acts, it will not stabilize the country. But we need a comprehensive strategy.


At this point, the best of several bad options is to mount extensive U.S. strikes, arm the moderate opposition and try to negotiate a political settlement with Russia and Iran. A Tomahawk-created peace is a fantasy.



This article also appears at Reuters.com, an Atlantic partner site.






    








Master Feed : The Atlantic



What Role Should the U.S. Play in the Middle East?

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Fireball in Russia’s Far East puzzles sky-watchers (VIDEO)




Published time: September 01, 2013 14:23

Image from cheslav.livejournal.com

Image from cheslav.livejournal.com




Witnesses in Russia’s Far East were astounded to see a spectacular burning object break up in the sky near Vladivostok. Though bloggers hailed it as a “meteor,” scientists are skeptical.


Photos and videos of the object posted online have provoked a debate on Russian social networks, with various ideas offered for what it might be.


I was sitting in my car. I did not start taking pictures immediately – first I did not pay attention. It was flying soundless,” said one Internet user, who posted several photos of the event.  


Witnesses said the early morning sky over Russky Island, across Vladivostok Bay, was lit up by a fireball, which later turned into a flaming line that remained in the sky for an hour and a half.


Some Russian media reported the sightings as a “meteor,” saying it was some 15 kilometers above the ground.


Other people speculated that the object could be a plane, an unmanned aircraft, a space craft or a distress flare.


Russian astronomer Vladimir Surdin linked the sighting to the launch of a Zenit 3SLB rocket from the Baikonur Space Center in Kazakhstan on Sunday.


The photos show that this was an artificial object,” Surdin, of the Stenberg Astronomical Institute in Moscow, said. “It was moving from west to east and was witnessed some 20 minutes after the launch.


Speculation that the object could have been a meteor was heightened because of the global media attention attracted by a meteor that exploded near Chelyabinsk, in Russia’s Urals region, in February.  On that occasion, the impact wave damaged several buildings and blew out thousands of windows amid frigid winter weather. One of the fragments that struck near Chebarkul left a crater six meters in diameter.





RT – News



Fireball in Russia’s Far East puzzles sky-watchers (VIDEO)

Friday, August 30, 2013

Does America Really Need Another War in the Middle East?


“Oh, when will they ever learn? Oh, when will they ever learn?” — Peter, Paul and Mary


By the time you read this, U.S. missiles and bombs may be falling on Syria. Why? Syria hasn’t attacked us. It does not pose a security threat to the United States.


These were arguments made against the Bush administration’s intervention in Iraq by some who now urge us to make war on Syria.


Secretary of State John Kerry, who as a senator was for the funding of U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, before he was against it, says the United States is certain that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has used chemical weapons on his own people, thus crossing a “red line” established by President Obama. 


Never mind that there were similar reports in June that al-Assad had used chemical weapons. This time it means war! Weren’t we told of the “certainty” that Saddam Hussein had chemical weapons?


Have we learned nothing? The future of Iraq is in doubt after a huge American investment of lives and money. Ditto Afghanistan. After U.S. help in toppling Moammar Gadhafi, Libya is anything but stable. Egypt is in turmoil after the Obama administration backed its Muslim Brotherhood-controlled government, whose leader and elected president, Mohamed Morsi, has been ousted by the military.


What makes anyone think bombing Damascus is going to bring positive change?


Obama has not asked Congress for permission to attack Syria, as President George W. Bush did before attacking Iraq. He hasn’t gone to the feckless United Nations, because Russia and China have announced they will veto any resolution authorizing military force.


The president doesn’t appear to have established anything like a “coalition of the willing,” as President Bush did with Iraq. Britain is with us, as usual, and France has pledged support, but what about the Arab World? The Saudis may be quietly helping, but that appears to be about it.


What’s the endgame? If by some miracle al-Assad and his leadership are hit by a missile, how do we prevent al Qaeda, present in Syria, from seizing power? There is a secular faction in Syria, but given the strength of Islamic fundamentalism throughout the region it is doubtful they will play a role.


Misjudging the Middle East has been a bipartisan experience. Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton displayed a shocking lack of judgment when she said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” two years ago: “Many of the members of Congress of both parties who have gone to Syria in recent months have said they believe (al-Assad’s) a reformer,” meaning I suppose he might be better than his father, who killed an estimated 25,000 of his fellow countrymen when his power was challenged.


Two days later Clinton attempted to walk back her comment, saying she was not speaking for herself or the Obama administration.


In 2007, then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., visited Syria against the wishes of the Bush administration. She said, “The road to Damascus is a road to peace.” That “road” appears to have developed a giant sinkhole.


If the only reason for U.S. intervention in Syria is humanitarian, where is the constitutional justification for that? There are many other inhumanities throughout the world. The Congo is one. As Jeffrey Gettleman noted last December in the New York Times: “Congo has become a never-ending nightmare, one of the bloodiest conflicts since World War II, with more than five million dead.” We’re not intervening there.


A Reuters/Ipsos poll has found that just 9 percent of American respondents favor U.S. military intervention in Syria.


Iran has threatened to strike Israel if the United States attacks Syria. There is grave danger, including possible terrorism, if we attack Syria. When will we ever learn? 




RealClearPolitics – Articles



Does America Really Need Another War in the Middle East?

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Syrian army kills 62 rebels east of Damascus

BEIRUT (Reuters) – Sixty-two rebel fighters were killed in a Syrian army ambush at dawn on Wednesday near the town of Adra, east of Damascus, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a monitoring group opposed to President Bashar al-Assad, said.



Reuters: Top News



Syrian army kills 62 rebels east of Damascus

Monday, August 5, 2013

US vision for Middle East?


Mohammed Saber / EPA



Egyptian supporters of ousted president Mohammed Morsi attend a protest near Rabaa al-Adawiya mosque in Cairo, Egypt, on Friday.




By Richard Engel, Chief Foreign Correspondent, NBC News


NEWS ANALYSIS


CAIRO — An Egyptian friend asked me if Washington backs the Muslim Brotherhood or the military that threw the Islamist party from power here last month.


“Whose side is the United States on?” he wanted to know.


Frankly, I didn’t know how to answer him — and it turns out, neither do many U.S. diplomats and intelligence analysts.


Several senior U.S. intelligence officers have told me they don’t see a clear U.S. policy — an American vision — for this volatile, oil rich land of prophets, religious passions and ancient scriptures. American policy, they said, seems to be reinvented day by day, veering from the management of one crisis to the next. Washington’s inconsistencies have been undeniable. 


The United States supported Egypt’s strongman president Hosni Mubarak for 30 years, until President Obama dumped him after 18 days of unrest in early 2011. That move sent a sign that Washington was with the students, activists and rebellious youths demanding change, and with the Islamic masses unchained after years of repression.


A few months later, President Obama ordered the U.S. military to back rebels in Libya. An “Obama Doctrine” seemed to be emerging, supporting change and turning against the nationalist, military-backed “big men” who have dominated the region for two generations.


But then, things changed. Bahrain, a close US ally and home to the Navy’s 5th Fleet, got a pass. The Gulf monarchy cracked down on its uprising while Washington stayed silent. Along came the mess in Syria. While Libyan revolutionaries were given air cover and NATO military advisers, Syrians rebels were left to die. A month ago I spent three days with Syrian rebel commander Selim Idris, traveling with him to the outskirts of what’s left of the once beautiful city of Aleppo. At times Idris was in tears of frustration with U.S. policy. 


“Is Washington with us or against us?” he asked. He told me of countless meetings he has had with U.S. diplomats, often going over the same ground.


“They say they want to help us, but don’t trust us. They say they will help, but don’t deliver. They give us just enough support to help keep us alive and fighting, but not enough to win. Do they want us all to die? Is that the U.S. goal? If it is just tell me!” he said.


Idris said he wants to meet with President Obama to ask him directly what Washington has in mind for Syria. As far as I know, that meeting hasn’t been added to the president’s agenda.


Meanwhile Egypt, the biggest country in the Middle East and the region’s cultural capital, has seen a dizzying array of positions from Washington. After dropping Mubarak, Washington supported the Muslim Brotherhood after it won a series of elections in 2012. Washington then changed again, accepting a military coup against the Brotherhood this summer as a fait accompli. Now the U.S. is trying to please both sides, stressing that the military and the Brotherhood should negotiate to avoid more bloodshed. 


There may not be much to negotiate about. The secular military and Islamist Brotherhood both want to rule this crowded narrow strip of green along the Nile. The gap between the two sides may be too wide to bridge. 


It’s no wonder the outgoing U.S. Ambassador in Cairo, Ann Patterson, is the most unpopular envoy here in decades. The Egyptian military accuses her of carrying water for the Brotherhood, supporting a group the army considers to be a terrorist group. But the Brotherhood thinks the ambassador helped Washington orchestrate, or at least green light, the military’s coup. Every child is taught if you try to please everyone, you end up upsetting everyone.


So what is the current U.S. policy in the Middle East? Does Washington back democracy and popular uprisings? Yes in Libya. No in Syria. No in Bahrain. Sometimes in Egypt. 


Does Washington stand with military-backed regimes that claim to ensure stability? No in Syria. Yes across the Persian Gulf. Sometimes in Egypt. No in Iran.


What is the Obama Doctrine? It seems to be one of disengagement, to try to ignore the hot, religious, dry, poor countries from Algeria to Pakistan. 


Around the same time of my somewhat disturbing conversations with U.S. policy experts on the Middle East, I met with a group of American business leaders: Internet innovators, tycoons, big money bankers and hedge fund managers. They talked about biotech, robotics, China and fracking in North America. They talked about the human genome project and supercomputers and 3D printing.  There was no mention at all of the Middle East. The arch of instability wedged between Europe and the Sahara Desert seemed to be written off, a sand trap for moguls to avoid at Augusta. The Sunnis and Shiites living in the footprint of the old Ottoman Empire would simply have to find their way, killing themselves if they had to. 


Perhaps this is the new U.S. policy toward the Middle East, a deliberate look away. It may also be a fantasy. A half a billion people live in the region from Algeria to Pakistan, and there is a tiny state in the middle of it called Israel, which has nuclear weapons and and many powerful friends. 


America openly talks of pivoting to Asia, but consider this: In February 2012, President Obama was in Myanmar, meeting Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi and discussing how the once-closed junta was returning to the community of nations that trade together. It was the Asia pivot in action. The President, however, spent much of the trip on the telephone, managing a minor war between Hamas and Israel. 


Like my Egyptian friend, most of the Middle East is frustrated with the lack of a clear U.S. policy these days. People often invent conspiracies to explain the inconsistencies, many of their theories angry, violent and anti-American. The region is struggling to adjust as the United States — the drafted referee of Middle Eastern affairs since the collapse of Europe in WWII — may want to get out of the sandbox.


Related:






US vision for Middle East?

Monday, July 29, 2013

Indyk expected to be named new U.S. Middle East envoy


Vice president and director of the Foreign Policy Program at the Brookings Institution in Washington D.C. , Martin Indyk, speaks during the U.S.- Islamic World Forum in Doha June 9, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Mohammed Dabbous




Reuters: Politics



Indyk expected to be named new U.S. Middle East envoy

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Exclusive: China in $5 billion drive to develop disputed East China Sea gas




BEIJING | Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:13am EDT



BEIJING (Reuters) – Chinese state-run oil companies hope to develop seven new gas fields in the East China Sea, possibly siphoning gas from the seabed beneath waters claimed by Japan, a move that could further inflame tensions with Tokyo over the disputed area.


Beijing had slowed exploration in the energy-rich East China Sea, one of Asia’s biggest security risks due to competing territorial claims, but is now rapidly expanding its hunt for gas, a cheaper and cleaner energy to coal and oil imports.


State-run Chinese oil and gas firm CNOOC Ltd will soon submit for state approval a plan to develop Huangyan phase II and Pingbei, totaling seven new fields, two industry officials with direct knowledge of the projects told Reuters.


The approval would bring the total number of fields in what is called the Huangyan project to nine.


China is already working on Huangyan I which has two fields approved. The Huangyan project is expected to cost more than 30 billion yuan ($ 4.9 billion), including 11 production platforms now under construction at Chinese shipyards.


If approved, the seven new gas fields would not see a big jump in China’s total gas output, supplying only a fraction of last year’s 106 billion cubic meters (bcm) and dwarfed by operations in the disputed South China Sea and Bohai Bay off north China. Chinese geologists said gas deposits in the East China Sea region were much smaller and more scattered.


The greater issue is the political risk if Beijing approves the new gas fields. Tensions over the East China Sea have escalated this year, with Beijing and Tokyo scrambling fighter jets and ordering patrol ships to shadow each other, raising the fear that a miscalculation could lead to a broader clash.


“It’s a sign of impatience on the side of the Chinese, stemming from a lack of movement on the Japanese side on the gas fields issue,” said Koichi Nakano, associate professor of political science at Sophia University in Tokyo.


China and Japan in 2008 agreed to jointly develop hydrocarbons in the area, but Tokyo wishes to settle the issue of maritime boundaries before developing the gas fields.


“The question is what will be Japan’s response and whether they would be able to talk China out of a unilateral move,” said Nakano. “But escalation of tensions leading to a war? I don’t think so. The Americans will be watching this situation with grave concern and may play a role of a mediator here.”


A spokesman for Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said: “Our understanding is that Japan and China should continue to have dialogue on the issue of joint exploitation of this area, so any unilateral action should not be accepted”.


Even if the National Development Reform Commission gives approval for the new gas fields, the pace of the development could be determined by China’s Foreign Ministry which requests oil companies to seek its approval before every drilling. Such permission may be influenced by tensions with Japan at the time.


MAJOR EAST CHINA SEA EXPANSION


China and Japan disagree on where the maritime boundary between them lies in the East China Sea. Beijing says its activities are in the Chinese territories, while Tokyo is worried the Chinese drilling near the disputed median line would tap into geological structures in its waters.


Japan lodged a protest early this month after detecting well construction works at Huangyan I about 26 kms (16 miles) west of the disputed median line. China’s foreign ministry rejected the protest as a baseless, saying Beijing had the right to drill in its sovereign waters.


U.S. Energy Information Administration estimated in 2012 that the East China Sea has between 1 and 2 trillion cubic feet (28-57 bcm) of proven and probable natural gas reserves, a modest gauge versus estimates by Chinese sources at up to 250 tcf in undiscovered gas resource.


If approved, the new gas fields would supply China’s manufacturing hub of Zhejiang province, about 400 km (249 miles) away on the east coast, with production slated to start in the fourth quarter of 2015, said the officials.


The fields would have a combined annual production capacity of nearly 4 bcm, up from the region’s current output of less than 1 bcm, and would account for about 2 percent of China’s estimated gas output by the end of 2016.


CNOOC and partner Sinopec Corp are already developing Huangyan I, which was officially approved by the National Development & Reform Commission in June 2012 and is due to start producing gas in September next year. Also on the planning board is Pingbei II, expected to come on line in 2016.


CNOOC media officials declined to comment on the new developments and industry sources quoted for the story declined to be identified due to the sensitive nature of the topic.


CHINA FAST-TRACKING HUNT FOR GAS


China, the world’s top energy user, is on a fast track to boost the use of natural gas, with demand for gas forecast to grow more than four fold by 2030 from the 147 bcm last year. China is the world’s fourth biggest gas consumer.


China first started pumping gas in early 2006 from the Chunxiao field, part of the massive Xihu trough, but territorial disputes have hindered an industry keen to explore and develop the region, Chinese industry experts said.


“China has made compromise, having slowed down the works quite a few years,” said a state oil official, “The cards are in the hands of Chinese, as companies are capable of developing (this area) after all the explorations done over the years.”


China’s plan to expand East China Sea operations comes after a near six-year lull in investment in the area, since the 2008 agreement to jointly develop hydrocarbons in the area.


“Since 2008 when the two nations reached a consensus for joint development, Japan has barely made any sincere diplomatic moves towards that direction…It seems that Japan wants to settle the boundaries first before moving to cooperations, which is totally unrealistic,” said Liu Junhong, research fellow at China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations.


Under the proposed expansion plan, Huangyan II, which is adjacent to the disputed maritime border, would consist of two gas fields. Huangyan I has two fields.


Pingbei, an uncontested area located in the western side of the Xihu trough, would have three fields under phase I and another two under phase II.


(Additional reporting by Linda SiegAntoni Slodkowski and Yuka Obayashi in Tokyo; Editing by Michael Perry)





Reuters: Business News



Exclusive: China in $5 billion drive to develop disputed East China Sea gas

Thursday, March 21, 2013

President Obama Meets Young Israelis and Palestinians on Second Day of his Middle East Trip

President Barack Obama and President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority walk past an honor guard

President Barack Obama and President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority walk past an honor guard at the Mugata Presidential Compound in Ramallah, the West Bank, March 21, 2013. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

President Obama was in the West Bank for the first time since 2008 on the second day of his visit to the Middle East, where he held meetings in Ramallah with Palestinian Authority President Abbas and Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Fayyad, and attended a cultural event at Al-Bireh Youth Center. President Obama, who was joined by Secretary of State John Kerry in his meetings, commended President Abbas and Prime Minister Fayyad for the progress that they’ve made in building the institutions of a Palestinian state.

“I’ve returned to the West Bank because the United States is deeply committed to the creation of an independent and sovereign state of Palestine,” President Obama said in a joint press conference with President Abbas. “Like people everywhere, Palestinians deserve a future of hope — that their rights will be respected, that tomorrow will be better than today and that they can give their children a life of dignity and opportunity. Put simply, Palestinians deserve a state of their own.”

In the interests of the Palestinian people, and also in the national security interest of Israel, the United States, and the world, President Obama reaffirmed “that the United States remains committed to realizing the vision of two states.”

We seek an independent, a viable and contiguous Palestinian state as the homeland of the Palestinian people, alongside the Jewish State of Israel — two nations enjoying self-determination, security and peace. As I have said many times, the only way to achieve that goal is through direct negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians themselves. There is no shortcut to a sustainable solution.

The President also spent time in Jerusalem today, this morning where he toured the Israel Museum and again in the afternoon, where he delivered remarks to the Israeli people from the Jerusalem International Convention Center. In his speech, President Obama spoke about the “unbreakable bonds of friendship” between Israel and the United States.

Those ties began only 11 minutes after Israeli independence, when the United States was the first nation to recognize the State of Israel. As President Truman said in explaining his decision to recognize Israel, he said, “I believe it has a glorious future before it not just as another sovereign nation, but as an embodiment of the great ideals of our civilization.”  And since then, we’ve built a friendship that advances our shared interests. 

Together, we share a commitment to security for our citizens and the stability of the Middle East and North Africa. Together, we share a focus on advancing economic growth around the globe, and strengthening the middle class within our own countries. Together, we share a stake in the success of democracy.

President Obama told the young people in the crowd that they would be the ones to shape our future, particularly on the three issues that will define our time — security, peace and prosperity. “And given the ties between our countries, I believe your future is bound to ours.”

“Israel is already a center for innovation that helps power the global economy,” he said. “And I believe that all of that potential for prosperity can be enhanced with greater security, enhanced with lasting peace.” 

Today, as we face the twilight of Israel’s founding generation, you — the young people of Israel– must now claim its future.  It falls to you to write the next chapter in the great story of this great nation. And as the President of a country that you can count on as your greatest friend, I am confident that you can help us find the promise in the days that lie ahead. 

President Barack Obama, accompanied by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, views the Dead Sea Scrolls

President Barack Obama, accompanied by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, views the Dead Sea Scrolls at The Israel Museum in Jerusalem, March 21, 2013. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

The day ended with a dinner at the residence of President Peres in Jerusalem.


White House.gov Blog Feed


President Obama Meets Young Israelis and Palestinians on Second Day of his Middle East Trip