Showing posts with label Everything. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Everything. Show all posts

Saturday, April 5, 2014

The Complete Interactive Guide To How The NSA Spies On Everything You Do

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



The Complete Interactive Guide To How The NSA Spies On Everything You Do

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Nova Scotia: We have everything we need to succeed

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Nova Scotia: We have everything we need to succeed

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Australian Identical Twins Share Everything from Boyfriend to Plastic Surgeries

At Hey WTF? News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Hey WTF? News and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Hey WTF? News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Hey WTF? News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Hey WTF? News.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Hey WTF? News and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Hey WTF? News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Hey WTF? News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Hey WTF? News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Australian Identical Twins Share Everything from Boyfriend to Plastic Surgeries

Saturday, February 22, 2014

Robert Reich: WhatsApp Is Everything Wrong with the U.S. Economy



The instant messaging service connects millions, but its record-breaking sale won"t generate new jobs.








This originally appeared on Robert Reich"s blog.

 

If you ever wonder what’s fueling America’s staggering inequality, ponder Facebook’s acquisition of the mobile messaging company WhatsApp.


According to news reports today, Facebook has agreed to buy WhatsApp for $ 19 billion.


That’s the highest price paid for a start-up in history. It’s $ 3 billion more than Facebook raised when it was first listed, and more than twice what Microsoft paid for Skype.


(To be precise, $ 12 billion of the $ 19 billion will be in the form of shares in Facebook, $ 4 billion will be in cash, and $ 3 billion in restricted stock to WhatsApp staff, which will vest in four years.)


Given that gargantuan amount, you might think WhatsApp is a big company. You’d be wrong. It has 55 employees, including its two young founders, Jan Koum and Brian Acton.


WhatsApp’s value doesn’t come from making anything. It doesn’t need a large organization to distribute its services or implement its strategy.


It value comes instead from two other things that require only a handful of people. First is its technology — a simple but powerful app that allows users to send and receive text, image, audio and video messages through the Internet.


The second is its network effect: The more people use it, the more other people want and need to use it in order to be connected. To that extent, it’s like Facebook — driven by connectivity.


WhatsApp’s worldwide usage has more than doubled in the past nine months, to 450 million people — and it’s growing by around a million users every day. On December 31, 2013, it handled 54 billion messages (making its service more popular than Twitter, now valued at about $ 30 billion.)


How does it make money? The first year of usage is free. After that, customers pay a small fee. At the scale it’s already achieved, even a small fee generates big bucks. And if it gets into advertising it could reach more eyeballs than any other medium in history. It already has a database that could be mined in ways that reveal huge amounts of information about a significant percentage of the world’s population.


The winners here are truly big winners. WhatsApp’s fifty-five employees are now enormously rich. Its two founders are now billionaires. And the partners of the venture capital firm that financed it have also reaped a fortune.


And the rest of us? We’re winners in the sense that we have an even more efficient way to connect with each other.


But we’re not getting more jobs.


In the emerging economy, there’s no longer any correlation between the size of a customer base and the number of employees necessary to serve them. In fact, the combination of digital technologies with huge network effects is pushing the ratio of employees to customers to new lows (WhatsApp’s 55 employees are all its 450 million customers need).


Meanwhile, the ranks of postal workers, call-center operators, telephone installers, the people who lay and service miles of cable, and the millions of other communication workers, are dwindling — just as retail workers are succumbing to Amazon, office clerks and secretaries to Microsoft, and librarians and encyclopedia editors to Google.


Productivity keeps growing, as do corporate profits. But jobs and wages are not growing. Unless we figure out how to bring all of them back into line – or spread the gains more widely – our economy cannot generate enough demand to sustain itself, and our society cannot maintain enough cohesion to keep us together.


 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



Robert Reich: WhatsApp Is Everything Wrong with the U.S. Economy

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Crybabies of the 1 Percent: The Rich Complain While Getting Away With Everything



Forget affluenza. The rich"s real "disease" is failing to get that their privileges come at a price: our contempt.








More than half a century ago, “West Side Story” satirized the idea that what was then known as juvenile delinquency was a product of poverty and the psychological maladjustments it produced, and that therefore “this boy don’t need a judge, he needs an analyst’s care.”


Since then, America has been busy transforming itself into an unabashed plutocracy: while median household income has barely budged since the mid-1960s, the annual income of the top 1 percent has increased by an average of approximately 200 percent in real terms.


So perhaps it’s not surprising that the belief that economic deprivation leads to psychological hardship, which in turn inspires youthful crimes, has not merely been discarded but, in some cases, actually inverted.


Consider the case of a Texas teenager who killed four people and severely injured two others while drunk-driving in his father’s pickup truck. Prosecutors wanted to send him to prison for 20 years, but a judge decided to give him no jail time at all after an expert witness for the defense testified that the defendant was suffering from “affluenza.”


This affliction, the psychologist testified, was a product of the defendant having spent his life in the lap of luxury. Having his parents’ cash between himself and reality had left the killer of four of his neighbors unable to make the connection between his decisions – such as his decision to drive a two-ton truck down a residential street at 70 miles per hour while drunk out of his mind – and the potential consequences of those decisions.


In short, the defense team argued, their client was depraved because he wasn’t deprived.


This argument seems to have worked on the judge, who sentenced the defendant to 10 years of probation after his wealthy family offered to pay for their son’s confinement in a $ 450,000-per-year in-patient facility, where apparently young scions are therapeutically guided toward the insight that randomly slaughtering your fellow citizens as a predictable consequence of your own selfishness and stupidity is a bad thing to do.


Understandably, the judge’s decision has outraged many people, including the families of the victims. Eric Broyles, whose wife and daughter were killed by the defendant, argued that “had he not had money to have the defense there, to also have the experts testify and also offer to pay for the treatment, I think the results would have been different.”



That’s probably true.  The rich can to a significant extent buy their way out of suffering the full consequences of their crimes and those of their children – not primarily through crude (and, and in the American justice system, fairly rare) mechanisms such as bribing judges and prosecutors, but because to be rich means that you will have almost limitless opportunities to manipulate the system toward working in your favor.


All this brings to mind the recent controversy over Tom Perkins’ remarks, comparing animosity toward the rich to the kind of hatred that eventually culminated in the genocidal persecution of the Jews by the Nazis. Perkins’ absurd exaggeration elicited a storm of condemnation, and rightly so.


Perkins’ remarks (which have been echoed by various other 1 percenters) point to the real affluenza, rather than the fake syndrome conjured up by an expert witness to help get a rich kid off the hook for four homicides. The real affluenza is the failure of the rich to appreciate that their special privileges – such as the privilege of operating under what is, from a practical perspective, a substantially different justice system than everyone else – must come at a price.


That price is paid in the form of the growing contempt of their fellow citizens, a contempt that grows in proportion to the ever-increasing gap in America between the children of privilege and everyone else.



 


 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



Crybabies of the 1 Percent: The Rich Complain While Getting Away With Everything

Friday, December 20, 2013

Athene"s Theory of Everything (Full Documentary)

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Athene"s Theory of Everything (Full Documentary)

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Working or Not, HealthCare.gov Has Ruined Everything


(Newser) – HealthCare.gov is working. Sort of. And certainly, some Democrats will take heart in that. But so what? Even if the modest fixes have saved the site and the law—as Dana Milbank argued today in the Washington Post—the problems have already done serious, lasting damage to the progressive cause, writes Matthew Yglesias at Slate. To explain why, he recounts his recent “extremely frustrating” attempt to obtain, not insurance, but a large garbage bin from DC’s Department of Public Works. The system was needlessly inconvenient and confusing, and phone support didn’t help; staffers were clearly weary from “a daily routine of dealing with irate customers.”


“Not every interaction with a government agency is this aggravating,” Yglesias allows, “but many of them are.” These bureaucracies basically work—”the trash (mostly) gets picked up”—but no one loves them. ObamaCare, too, may basically work. But progressives had hoped to restore faith in government, to prove it deserved a bigger role in society. Instead, we have “a system that function about as well as the DC garbage bin operation, Amtrak security theater, or the DMV.” Click for the full post.




Newser



Working or Not, HealthCare.gov Has Ruined Everything

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Campaign Donations – The Price of Everything


I’m not equipped enough to go into the Federal Reserve details with the continual printing of some $ 85 billion per month that is being pumped into the nation.  I just know the problem continues and escalates.  But I came across an article this morning that explains something about where the money is going.  Consider the price of anything and ask what is in that price…what does the supplier do with the money that you spend to purchase anything?  Does the price have any true relationship to the cost of production with added profit for the company producing it?  (economics is not my tour de force…just warning you.)


remote_image_1329813159Because our government has become a corrupt soviet socialist + fascist system of “pay to play,” the companies from which we purchase goods and the non-profits to whom citizens donate are paying off politicians for “favorable” legislation.  Trust me, there will never be enough money in your pocket to get into this club.  Trust me, the supposed “favorable” legislation is not “favorable” to you, but is designed to strip your pockets and grease the skids for government clients.  


The article that caught my attention was this  From the Daily Caller on the subject of how environmentalist groups spent fortunes on the VA governor’s race.  Ask yourself why they would do that?  


Two of McAuliffe’s biggest funders were the Virginia League of Conservation Voters and NextGen Climate Action. They each spent about $ 1.7 million on the former Democratic National Committee chairman’s campaign. The Virginia Chapter of the Sierra Club gave nearly $ 500,000 to McAuliffe. 


Green groups also spent millions on TV ad buys during the campaign. NextGen Climate Action, which was founded by San Francisco billionaire Tom Steyer, spent more than $ 2.4 million — the most spent on TV buys by any group.


Steyer, a major Obama fundraiser, has been a large backer of anti-Keystone XL campaigns and his political group, NextGen, also supported the election of Democrat Ed Markey of Massachusetts to the Senate.


Environmentalists were successful at making global warming a central issue in the campaign, having former University of Virginia climate scientist and global warming activist Michael Mann stump for McAuliffe.



The same article explains that the coal industry also donated to McAuliffe, but didn’t contribute anywhere near the huge amounts that the environmentalists did.  As you know, the coal industry is being decimated by the leftists in elected and unelected positions.  I would guess that the coal industry doesn’t have the disposable funds to play this game anymore.  Whether or not you agree that fossil fuels are evil, you would have to conclude that the fossil fuel industries have afforded us all a great life of prosperity AND that America has the cleanest energy industry on the planet.  Your energy rates and costs keep going up and up in your house.  You also know that wind, solar, and biofuels are not going to provide anything close to the energy needs we have or will have in the future….And that they are more expensive alternatives.  You also have to know that environmentalist groups who are pushing the hoax of global warming / climate change are not interested in your energy security. 


Lest you think I am raining on the environmentalists only, no I am not.  Corporations are doing the same thing; pouring buckets of money into campaigns.  Some do it through the Chamber of Commerce.  Some do it through the US Green Building Council.  Some just do it directly.  Pay to play.  


The point I am trying to make is that the price of your cup of coffee, your gallon of gasoline, your house, your light bulbs, your everything, is paying to elect people who have no interest at all in the free market system, but have every interest in picking your pocket.  You see, these campaign contributions aren’t manifested out of thin air.  They come from you when you purchase something….and then you wonder why the price of everything is going through the roof.  You are paying to elect people who don’t care if your standard of living goes into the basement as long as they get their piece of your pie.


Campaigns for candidates run on money.  Karl Rove is now worth millions of dollars.  Gee, I guess we’ve all seen the Clinton’s coffers fill up and overflow. I honestly don’t know how to change the system of campaign contributions to something less corrupt.  I don’t believe we should have a government run campaign system, so scratch that.  If you have a better answer on this, I’d like to hear it.


All of this Fed printing isn’t going into your pocket as I’m sure you noticed, but it is going somewhere.  I think a large part of it is going straight back to those who are shoveling it as fast as they can into the pockets of government legislators.  In the meantime, inflation is rolling right along.  Too many dollars in chase of too few goods.  So all of this money is not going into production of needed goods.  You pay more for the goods you need, and the politicians are laughing all the way to the bank. 


I’m not sure how small government conservatives will ever win another election with this scenario in place.   As the old saying goes: Is this any way to run a railroad?


Don’t forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Google Plus.




Freedom Outpost



Campaign Donations – The Price of Everything

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Maddow: After Everything, GOP Comes Up Empty


Luke Russert, NBC News Capitol Hill correspondent, talks with Rachel Maddow about the likelihood of another shutdown crisis in Congress in the future. Next, Rachel gives a concise review of just how badly Republicans lost this month.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Maddow: After Everything, GOP Comes Up Empty

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Government Shutdown? 36 Facts Which Prove That Almost Everything Is Still Running


The West Front of the U.S. CapitolAll of this whining and crying about a “government shutdown” is a total joke.  You see, there really is very little reason why this “government shutdown” cannot continue indefinitely because almost everything is still running.  63 percent of all federal workers are still working, and 85 percent of all government activities are still being funded during this “shutdown”.  Yes, the Obama administration has been making a big show of taking down government websites and blocking off the World War II Memorial, but overall business in Washington D.C. is being conducted pretty much as usual.  It turns out that the definition of “essential personnel” has expanded so much over the years that almost everyone is considered “essential” at this point.  In fact, this shutdown is such a non-event that even referring to it as a “partial government shutdown” would really be overstating what is actually happening.  The following are 36 facts which prove that almost everything is still running during this government shutdown…


#1 According to U.S. Senator Rand Paul, 85 percent of all government activities are actually being funded during this “government shutdown”.


#2 Approximately 1,350,000 “essential” federal employees will continue to work during this “government shutdown”.


#3 Overall, 63 percent of the federal workforce will continue to work during this “government shutdown”.


#4 The U.S. Postal Service will continue to deliver our mail.


#5 U.S. military personnel will remain on duty and will continue to get paid.


#6 Social Security recipients will continue to get their benefits.


#7 Medicare recipients will continue to get their benefits.


#8 Medicaid recipients will continue to get their benefits.


#9 Food stamp recipients will continue to get their benefits.


#10 Those on unemployment will continue to get their benefits.


#11 Federal retirees will continue to get their pensions.


#12 The federal school lunch program has enough money to go through at least the end of this month.


#13 Public schools all over the country will continue to stay open.


#14 Almost all federal law enforcement officials will continue working.


#15 The Federal Reserve will remain “completely functional“.


#16 The Supreme Court will continue to operate normally and federal courts have enough money to keep going for at least two weeks.


#17 TSA employees will continue to molest travelers at our airports.


#18 Air traffic controllers will continue to monitor traffic at our airports.


#19 Hopelessly outmanned border patrol agents will continue to try to stem the tide of illegal immigration.


#20 Visas and passports will continue to be issued by the State Department.


#21 The Veterans Administration will continue to offer substandard medical services, and it will be able to continue processing benefit payments at least for now.


#22 The Obama administration apparently has plenty of money to spend on closing open-air memorials that are usually open to the public 24 hours a day.


#23 The Department of Defense announced the awarding of 94 new contracts worth a combined total of more than 5 billion dollars on September 30th – the day right before the “government shutdown”.


#24 The “government shutdown” has not prevented the new two billion dollar NSA spy center from opening up.


#25 Federal prisons will continue to operate normally.


#26 Amtrak trains will continue to run.


#27 The Patent and Trademark Office will be open.


#28 The Consumer Product Safety Commission will continue to issue product recalls if the products “create an immediate threat to the safety of human life“.


#29 The National Weather Service and the National Hurricane Center will continue to track weather patterns.


#30 If the federal government needs to respond to a natural disaster, this “shutdown” will not affect that.


#31 NASA will continue to support the Mars Rover and the two American astronauts up on the International Space Station.


#32 All city employees of the D.C. government have been deemed “essential” and will continue to go to work.


#33 Even though the Obamacare exchanges are not working properly, people will still be able to access them.


#34 The IRS will continue to collect taxes, but it will be suspending punitive audits of conservative organizations.


#35 Barack Obama will continue to get paid for the full duration of this “shutdown”.


#36 The U.S. Congress will continue to get paid for the full duration of this “shutdown”.


Of course not everything is operating normally during this government shutdown.  Government parks are closed.  The EPA and the Department of Energy have almost totally closed up shop.  But overall, most Americans are not going to notice much of a difference.


And perhaps now is a good time for the American people to evaluate whether or not they actually need a gigantic federal government that wastes enormous mountains of our money.


For example, our federal government recently spent $ 98,670 to construct a single outhouse in Alaska.


That is more than a lot of Americans pay for their entire houses.


For many more examples like this, please see my previous article entitled “The Waste List: 66 Crazy Ways That The U.S. Government Is Wasting Your Hard-Earned Money“.


It is about time that Washington D.C. started experiencing some of the “belt-tightening” that the rest of the country has been going through.  For far too long, the fatcats in D.C. have been living in an alternate reality where they have been able to live the high life at our expense.  A recent blog post by Daniel Greenfield discussed how this shutdown is going to affect the alternate reality that the Obamas have been living in…


The government shutdown has forced Obama to make do with only a quarter of his 1,701 person staff. That would leave 436 “vital” employees. The 90 people who look after his living quarters would be slashed to 15 to “provide minimum maintenance and support”.


Buckingham Palace, which is twelve times the size of the White House and has its own clockmaker, only has an 800 person staff. King Harald V of Norway and his court make do with 152 staffers. King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden gets by with 203.


On Twitter, Michelle Obama announced that she is unable to Tweet on her own without the aid of all of her sixteen assistants; many of whom take home six figure salaries. There are more directors, associate directors and deputy associate directors on Michelle Obama’s staff than there were in George Washington’s entire administration.


Presidents have fought wars and made peace, explored and annexed vast territories and built a nation out of a handful of colonies with fewer senior staffers than are needed to handle Michelle Obama’s Twitter account.



Oh the humanity!  Will Michelle Obama ever tweet again?  And how will the White House continue to function without at least one projectionist on duty at the White House 24 hours a day?


No wonder Barack Obama is so upset about this shutdown.


In the end, this shutdown could turn out to be very good for America.  We have a government that is wildly out of control and that desperately needs to be reigned in.


During the Obama administration, federal debt held by the public has risen by 90 percent, and overall federal government spending has risen by a whopping 317 percent since 1990.


So is it really a bad thing that the federal government has been forced to cut back for a little while?


Our politicians can whine and cry all they want.  They won’t be getting any sympathy from me.



Be Sociable, Share!

















The Economic Collapse


Commentary from Experts around the web…



Government Shutdown? 36 Facts Which Prove That Almost Everything Is Still Running

Monday, September 9, 2013

Assad: "Expect everything" in response to attack








US Secretary of State John Kerry speaks during a news conference with Britain’s Foreign Minister William Hague at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London, Monday, Sept. 9, 2013. Kerry said Syria’s President Bashar Assad could resolve the crisis surrounding a chemical weapons attack simply by turning over “every single bit” of his weapons stock to the international community within a week. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, Pool)





US Secretary of State John Kerry speaks during a news conference with Britain’s Foreign Minister William Hague at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London, Monday, Sept. 9, 2013. Kerry said Syria’s President Bashar Assad could resolve the crisis surrounding a chemical weapons attack simply by turning over “every single bit” of his weapons stock to the international community within a week. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, Pool)





US Secretary of State John Kerry speaks during a news conference with Britain’s Foreign Minister William Hague at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London, Monday, Sept. 9, 2013. Kerry said Syria’s President Bashar Assad could resolve the crisis surrounding a chemical weapons attack simply by turning over “every single bit” of his weapons stock to the international community within a week. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, Pool)





Britain Foreign Secretary William Hague, left, greets US Secretary of State John Kerry outside the Foreign Office in London,Monday, Sept. 9, 2013. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant, Pool)





Britain Foreign Secretary William Hague waits to greet US Secretary of State John Kerry outside the Foreign Office in London, Monday, Sept. 9, 2013. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant, Pool)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — Syrian President Bashar Assad is warning the U.S. of repercussions if it launches a military strike against him. “You should expect everything,” Assad said in an interview, while denying that his troops used chemical weapons. “If you strike somewhere, you have to expect the repercussions somewhere else,” he said.


In London, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was unmoved by Assad’s denial, saying he would be confident going into any courtroom with the evidence gathered by the United States that Syria’s government used chemical weapons against its people.


“What does he offer?” Kerry asked of Assad. “Words that are contradicted by fact.”


At the White House, National Security Council spokeswoman Bernadette Meehan said, “It doesn’t surprise us that someone who would kill thousands of his own people, including hundreds of children with poison gas, would also lie about it.”


As the administration stokes its arguments for a limited military strike, President Barack Obama plans an intense round of TV interviews Monday evening and Kerry is returning to Washington from his trip seeking international support. The United States, citing intelligence reports, says the lethal nerve agent sarin was used in an Aug. 21 attack outside Damascus, and that 1,429 people died, including 426 children.


Obama administration officials plan more classified briefings on Capitol Hill. And White House national security adviser Susan Rice is scheduled for a Washington think tank speech timed to the public relations blitz aimed at assuring Americans the administration isn’t contemplating another Iraq-Afghanistan style commitment.


The all-points push sets up a prime-time speech by Obama Tuesday night, with votes looming in the Senate as early as Wednesday and likely next week in the House.


In the interview aired Monday on “CBS This Morning,” Assad said the evidence about chemical weapons that Kerry is presenting amounts to a “big lie” that resembles the case for war in Iraq that Secretary of State Colin Powell made to the United Nations over a decade ago.


Assad also suggested the rebels fighting his government might be responsible for the alleged gas attack in the Damascus suburbs.


Asked whether he was making a threat of direct military retaliation to any U.S. attack, Assad was vague, saying at one point, “I am not fortune teller to tell you what’s going to happen.”


“It’s not only the government (that’s) the only player in this region,” he said. “You have different parties. You have different factions. You have different ideology. You have everything in this region now. So you have to expect that.”


At a news conference in London with British Foreign Secretary William Hague, Kerry said that if Assad wanted to defuse the crisis, “he could turn every single bit of his chemical weapons over to the international community” within a week. But he said that Assad “isn’t about to do it.”


Kerry said the U.S. knows “that his regime gave orders to prepare for a chemical attack. We know they deployed forces,” Kerry said.


He added: “So the evidence is powerful and the question for all of us is, what are we going to do about it. Turn our backs? Have a moment of silence?”


Meanwhile, Russian and Syrian foreign ministers said they will push for the return of United Nations inspectors to Syria to continue their probe into the use of chemical weapons. Russia’s Sergey Lavrov said after Monday’s talks with his Syrian counterpart Walid al-Moallem that Moscow will continue to promote a peaceful settlement and may try to convene a gathering of all Syrian opposition figures who are interested in peaceful settlement.


Lavrov said that a U.S. attack on Syria will deal a fatal blow to peace efforts.


Obama plans interviews Monday evening with the network TV newscasts as well as CNN, Fox and PBS.


On Tuesday, he will meet with Senate Democrats about Syria, according to two Senate Democratic aides. The meeting at the Capitol would come just hours before Obama addresses the nation in a prime-time speech on Syria from the White House.


Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is scheduled to speak Monday at a White House event on wildlife trafficking, planned to reiterate her support of Obama’s efforts to pass the Syria resolution, according to a Clinton aide who spoke on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to speak publicly.


Obama and his allies are arguing that the United States needs to remind hostile nations such as Iran and North Korea of American military might while working to reassure the nation that the lessons of the last decade were fresh in their minds.


“It is not Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya,” White House chief of staff Denis McDonough said Sunday during one of his five network television interviews. “This is a very concerned, concentrated, limited effort that we can carry out and that can underscore and secure our interests.”


But McDonough conceded the administration lacks “irrefutable, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence” that skeptical Americans, including lawmakers who will start voting on military action this week, are seeking.


“It’s an uphill slog,” said Rep. Mike Rogers, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who supports strikes on Assad. “I think it’s very clear he’s lost support in the last week,” Rogers added, speaking of the president.


A survey by The Associated Press shows that House members who are staking out positions are either opposed to or leaning against Obama’s plan for a military strike by more than a 6-1 margin.


“Lobbing a few Tomahawk missiles will not restore our credibility overseas,” said Rep. Mike McCaul, the Texas Republican who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee.


Added Rep. Loretta Sanchez, D-Calif.: “For the president to say that this is just a very quick thing and we’re out of there, that’s how long wars start.”


Despite public backing from leaders of both parties to strike, almost half of the 433 current members in the House and a third of the 100-member Senate remain undecided, the AP survey found. They will be the subject of intense lobbying from the administration — as well as outside groups that have formed coalitions that defy the traditional left-right divide.


Public opinion surveys show intense American skepticism about military intervention in Syria, even among those who believe Syria’s government used chemical weapons on its people.


The United States, citing intelligence reports, says the lethal nerve agent sarin was used in an Aug. 21 attack outside Damascus, and that 1,429 people died, including 426 children.


Top administration officials, including Kerry, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, planned to brief lawmakers ahead of the Wednesday vote on a resolution that would authorize the “limited and specified use” of U.S. armed forces against Syria for no more than 90 days.


The measure bars American ground troops from combat. A final vote is expected at week’s end and the House is expected to take up the issue the following week.


___


Follow Philip Elliott on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/philip_elliott


__


Associated Press writers Jim Kuhnhenn and Ken Thomas contributed to this report.


Associated Press




Top Headlines



Assad: "Expect everything" in response to attack

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Everything Has a Price


Everyone dreams of living a lavish lifestyle at one time or another. Who hasn’t imagined lounging on the sandy beach of a remote island resort, driving a brand new luxury vehicle or wearing an expensive piece of jewelry that defines the word “bling?”  Billboards, television commercials and magazine ads often tout the “posh life” and although most people realize they will never live or want to live such an extravagant existence, there are some folks that will do just about anything to be rich and famous.  The Orlando Sentinel details the story of one woman who became rich for a short period of time before becoming famous (if having your mug shot posted on the Internet and television qualifies you as famous) for running a business that bilked Medicaid of more than $ 3 million for services that were never rendered.


The 29-year-old ran a business in the Winter Park area of Florida that supposedly helped guide clients through mental health service programs.  According to the story, the only improvements being made were to the fraudster’s bank account balance.  For more than a year, the con woman made $ 608,000 in debit card purchases, while withdrawing approximately $ 162,000 in cash.  Medicaid funds (paid for by your tax dollars) helped to maintain her lavish lifestyle with a just a few luxury items including a posh downtown Orlando condo, multiple Escalades, a Mercedes, a Ducati motorcycle, (How many modes of transportation does one person need?), several vacations and more than $ 175,000 of Louis Vuitton products. (Apparently, you can never have too many purses.  It must be a fashion rule that you should have several designer options available to coordinate with each vehicle you drive – for each day of the week, no less.)


Supposedly, the business-owner obtained her victims’ Medicaid numbers by setting up a tent at a local shopping center where she handed out condoms and first aid supplies, while offering $ 25 gift cards in exchange for the personal information.  One client, who never received any services from the company, had more than 100 claims submitted on his behalf. (Seems like a pretty high price to pay for a few free giveaways.) Authorities say several employees also benefited from the scheme by double billing for services that never occurred and receiving kickbacks for providing valid Medicaid numbers, even from family members.  The woman has agreed to testify in those cases.


The woman pleaded guilty to racketeering and identity theft charges and agreed to cooperate with investigators.  She abandoned approximately $ 1 million in seized assets. (That’s a good start.)


Everything has a price, and it never ceases to amaze me what a person would do to live large. (And it always seems to be at the expense of others.) It’s a given that she will have to pay a steep price and learn to adjust to a lower standard of living.  Posh and lavish don’t exactly describe a jail cell.




Watchdog.org



Everything Has a Price

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Bhutan"s New Prime Minister Says Happiness Isn"t Everything





Tshering Tobgay receives appointment as prime minister in the Bhutanese capital, Thimpu, last week.



AFP/AFP/Getty Images

Tshering Tobgay receives appointment as prime minister in the Bhutanese capital, Thimpu, last week.



Tshering Tobgay receives appointment as prime minister in the Bhutanese capital, Thimpu, last week.


AFP/AFP/Getty Images



Sad but true, Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness index is not immune to politics.


Much has been made in recent years of the measure preferred by the tiny Buddhist kingdom over such cold and utilitarian Western-style metrics as gross domestic product.


The term “gross national happiness” was coined in 1972 by Bhutan’s former King Jigme Singye Wangchuk, and the idea of focusing on the less-quantifiable measure of happiness to determine the health of a nation has steadily gained currency among trendier academic and policy circles.


Canada, France and Britain have jumped on the happiness bandwagon by adding measures of citizen happiness to their official national statistics.In recent years, Bhutan’s (now former) Prime Minister Jigme Thinley and its Secretary of Gross National Happiness, Karma Tshiteem, have attended numerous conferences and talks at such venues as the World Economic Forum, Seattle’s Green Festival and a gathering in Vermont, where Tshiteem explained to NPR that his country was “more focused on creating the right conditions that can lead people to fulfilling, and hopefully, happy lives.”


But being a global champion of the Bhutanese ideal of happiness didn’t translate into votes at home, and last month, Thinley lost at the polls, a defeat that was “attributed partly to his aggressive international public relations campaign to promote GNH at the expense of domestic needs,” according to Business Insider.


Thinley’s successor, Tshering Tobgay, has already signaled he will step back from promoting GNH, both as a measure of success in his own country and as an object of international diplomacy.


Bhutan’s problems, as Tobgay points out, range from a “ballooning debt” that is barely sustainable, to unemployment and growing corruption. As a result of the problems, some in Bhutan have begun referring to the GNH derisively as “government needs help”, the BBC reports.


Tobgay, 47, says he supports the notion that gross national product isn’t the “be-all and end-all of development”, but he says, if the government “[spends] a disproportionate amount of time talking about GNH rather than delivering basic services, then it is a distraction.”


With the GNH’s reassessment at home, he is also reconsidering its value as an export, too.


Asked whether his government would continue promoting Gross National Happiness abroad, Tobgay said: “I believe it’s not the job of the government to do that.”


A study by National Geographic discovered that the world’s happiest places had some basic things in common, such as freedom from worry about getting healthcare and education, as well as a sense of equality — things that Tobgay would argue are missing in Bhutan.




News



Bhutan"s New Prime Minister Says Happiness Isn"t Everything

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

McConnell To Reid: If You Go Nuclear On Nominations, I"ll Go Nuclear On Everything When I"m Majority Leader


Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) on Tuesday starkly warned Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) not to eliminate the filibuster on presidential nominations, warning that he’ll end the 60-vote threshold for everything, including bills, if becomes the majority leader.


“There not a doubt in my mind that if the majority breaks the rules of the Senate to change the rules of the Senate with regard to nominations, the next majority will do it for everything,” McConnell said on the floor.


With at least half a dozen key judicial and cabinet nominees pending, all of whom Republicans have problems with, Reid has threatened to invoke the so-called nuclear option to change the rules of the Senate and eliminate the filibuster on nominations — but not anything else.


Backed up by Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), who echoed his warnings in a floor colloquy Tuesday, McConnell said his hypothetical majority would take it a step further.


“I wouldn’t be able to argue, a year and a half from now if I were the majority leader, to my colleagues that we shouldn’t enact our legislative agenda with a simple 51 votes, having seen what the previous majority just did,” he said. “I mean there would be no rational basis for that.”


The minority leader sketched out what a Republican-led Senate would do with 51 votes. Job No. 1, he said, would be to repeal Obamacare. He also mentioned lifting the ban on oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, approving the Keystone XL pipeline and repealing the estate tax (which he called the “death tax”).


“These are the kinds of priorities that our members feel strongly about, and I think I would be hard pressed,” McConnell said, “to argue that we should restrain ourselves from taking full advantage of this new Senate.”


“From the country’s point of view, it’s a huge step in the wrong direction,” he said.



Sahil Kapur

Sahil Kapur is a congressional reporter for TPM. He previously covered politics and public policy for numerous publications including The Guardian and The Huffington Post. He can be reached at sahil [at] talkingpointsmemo.com.





submit to reddit




TPM News



McConnell To Reid: If You Go Nuclear On Nominations, I"ll Go Nuclear On Everything When I"m Majority Leader