Showing posts with label campaign. Show all posts
Showing posts with label campaign. Show all posts

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Chief Justice John Roberts Shreds Another Campaign Finance Law—Individuals May Now Shower Gold on Pols



The latest campaign finance ruling is another victory for the plutocrats.








The U.S. Supreme Court majority led by Chief Justice John Roberts has overturned one of the few remaining barriers in American elections that seek to limit wealthy individuals from using vast amounts of their money for political power and influence.


Wednesday’s ruling, in McCutcheon v. FEC,threw out parts of a 2002 law that imposed a $ 123,000 limit on federal campaign contributions in a two-year congressional cycle. It came in a lawsuit brought by a Republican Alabama businessman and the GOP that was designed to challenge those so-called aggregate contribution limits.


“Candidates will solicit million-dollar checks, contributors will write them and the pay-to-play system in Washington will only become more direct,” said J. Gerald Hebert, the executive director of the Campaign Legal Center. “The Roberts Court has exponentially increased the already-significant political influence of the very richest while further undermining the influence of the overwhelming majority of Americans who could not afford to write checks to politicians for even a fraction of the former aggregate contribution limit of more than $ 123,000 per election cycle.” 


While the conservative majority’s anti-regulatory ruling was expected, coming four years after its Citizens United ruling that deregulated some corporate contributions, what was striking about Wednesday’s ruling was its contemptuous tone, written by the Chief Justice, on the subject of what’s best for American democracy.


The legal basis for upholding campaign finance regulations is to prevent corruption, the Supreme Court ruled in 1976. But the Roberts Court, as was the case in Citizens United, chose to define corruption as a quid pro quo activity—like a bribe, which is already illegal—and turned a blind eye to what anybody who has worked in politics knows: that spending large sums of money on someone’s agenda or election does not come without some strings attached or expectation of future benefit.


Roberts wrote:


Spending large sums of money in connection with elections, but not in connection with an effort to control the exercise of an officeholder’s official duties, does not give rise to quid pro quo corruption. Nor does the possibility that an individual who spends large sums may garner “influence over or access to” elected officials or political parties.



This twisted legal logic was then used by Roberts to create a narrow rationale allowing the Court’s conservative majority to throw out the contribution caps.


The Government argues that the aggregate [contribution] limits further the permissible objective of preventing quid pro quo corruption. The difficulty is that once the aggregate limits kick in, they ban all contributions of any amount, even though Congress’s selection of a base limit indicates its belief that contributions beneath that amount do not create a cognizable risk of corruption. The Government must thus defend the aggregate limits by demonstrating that they prevent circumvention of the base limits, a function they do not serve in any meaningful way.



Roberts then tossed the ball back to Congress, asserting that while this part of its 2002 law was unconstitutional, Congress could try again to write better rules.


There are multiple alternatives available to Congress that would serve the Government’s interest in preventing circumvention while avoiding “unnecessary abridgment” of First Amendment rights. Such alternatives might include targeted restrictions on transfers among candidates and political committees, or tighter earmarking rules.



These lines of reasoning are a classic case of Supreme Court justices who either don’t understand how politics works—or understand it all too well—and want to shift the balance of power in Washington by undermining Congress’s ability to regulate elections and increasing the power of political parties and their biggest contributors.


The Campaign Legal Center’s Hebert, who is one of the nation’s foremost voting rights and campaign finance attorneys, said the ruling was arrogant in just this way.


“The Court today abandoned any pretense of respecting Supreme Court precedent or Congressional expertise on matters of campaign finance when it struck down longstanding federal limits on aggregate contributions to candidates, parties and PACs,” he said. “Once again, the Roberts Court exhibits its complete ignorance of political realities, or worse, chose to ignore those realities, in striking down laws written by Congress, which is intimately aware of the political corruption that will likely ensue in the wake of this decision.”


On a more practical level, other campaign finance reformers said that the ruling would unleash a torrent of big checks to both major parties, which would likely make them even more responsive than they are now to corporate and narrow monied interests.


“Our Founders feared corruption,” said Michael Waldman, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law president. “They did not want government beholden to narrow, elite interests… Following the Citizens United decision, this will further inundate a political system already flush with cash, marginalize average voters, and elevate those who can afford to buy political access.”


“This is truly a decision establishing plutocrat rights,” said Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen. “In practical terms, the decision means that one individual can write a single check for $ 5.9 million to be spent by candidates, political parties and political committees… That is not democracy. That is plutocracy.”


 


 


 


 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



Chief Justice John Roberts Shreds Another Campaign Finance Law—Individuals May Now Shower Gold on Pols

Scott Brown Hires Former Christie Aide as Campaign Manager

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Scott Brown Hires Former Christie Aide as Campaign Manager

Friday, April 4, 2014

Symposium: McCutcheon and the future of campaign finance regulation

Once the Court granted probable jurisdiction in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, it seemed likely, and was confirmed at oral argument, that a majority of Justices viewed aggregate contribution limits as unjustified under the First Amendment.  The predictable reactions to the decision fell into two longstanding camps:  the defenders of political freedom versus the guardians of regulation.  As reflected by the divided Court, there are those who seek to minimize government intrusion into political speech and those who believe considerable government regulation is necessary to safeguard democracy and prevent corruption.


Critics of the case are making the direst predictions since, well, Citizens United.  In his 2010 State of the Union address, President Obama personally lectured members of the Court and predicted a “stampede” of money resulting from that decision, including money from foreign sources.  The amount of money spent in subsequent elections rose, although at a rate no higher than in preceding elections.  The foreign money has yet to show up, perhaps that is because it is illegal for foreigners to contribute in American elections and courts since Citizens United upheld the ban.  Now some, including Justice Breyer in his dissent in McCutcheon (asserting “grave problems with democratic legitimacy”), seem to be predicting the collapse of our democracy.


The nation was not an illegitimate democracy and did not collapse in the first two hundred years or so of its existence, when there were few or no regulations of campaign financing.  It is hard to see how, when, or why the McCutcheon case and its limited holding will now destroy the foundation of our democracy.   It is more likely that the current predictions, like President Obama’s prediction after Citizens United, will not come true and that the underlying reason for the hysteria may be a growing realization that the First Amendment continues to curtail the extent to which advocates of campaign finance regulation can regulate.


The practical effect of McCutcheon is that individuals will still be subject to a limit (currently $ 2600) on contributions to any one candidate and higher limits on contributions to any PAC or party committee.  Now, however, donors will no longer be limited in the number of candidates or committees they may support.  The dissent indulges in elaborate speculation that individuals after the ruling theoretically may contribute to every candidate and every committee and thereby dispense over $ 3 million in contributions.  This is a little like saying that because Nazis have a First Amendment right to parade in Skokie, Illinois, we can expect Nazi parades to break out in every city and town in the country.  The fact is there aren’t that many wealthy individuals and there still are laws that prohibit earmarking and laundering.  Moreover, some people may be rich but they are not stupid.  They will not irrationally give money to candidates they don’t know, or don’t agree with or who don’t have a chance of winning or who don’t need the money or who may not even be in contested races.  Mr. McCutcheon had the charming patriotic habit of making his checks payable in the amount of $ 1776.  He gave checks to sixteen candidates before encountering the unconstitutional limit.  He stated that there were ten more candidates that he wanted to support with similar donations but legally could not.  Aren’t contributions to twenty-six candidates a more likely scenario than Justice Breyer’s extravagant hypothetical, which presumes contributions to 468 candidates?


There is no denying that some individuals like Mr. McCutcheon will increase the number of candidates that they support with their limited donations.  This will result in modest increased funding in a system that during 2011-2012 saw $ 7.2 billion raised and spent.  (Approximately $ 1 billion was raised and spent by President Obama’s reelection committee and the Democratic National Committee.)  The national parties are potentially greater beneficiaries, because they no longer will have to compete for a portion of a supporter’s overall limit on contributions to parties and committees.  Any increase in candidate or party funding is a positive development since the money is still subject to limit, publicly disclosed, and received by the electorally most accountable participants in politics.


While the relative practical effect of McCutcheon is modest, the continuing effect on future campaign reform may not be.  In a forty-year stream of cases starting with Buckley, the Supreme Court has questioned and struck down a litany of campaign finance schemes.  The unconstitutional statutes included:  limits on how much a candidate’s campaign can spend after collecting limited donations; limits or bans on how much an individual, a PAC, or a party committee could spend without collaborating with a candidate; a ban on contributions by minors; a contribution limit of $ 400 (too low); public financing programs that punished or rewarded persons who did not participate or who made independent expenditures; increased contributions for candidates who were opposed by candidates who fund their own campaigns; and independent spending by corporations and unions.   At the same time, Justice Clarence Thomas has been the only Justice who advocated overturning Buckley’s allowance for contribution limits.  His concurrence in McCutcheon did so again.


The Court’s jurisprudence sends a clear message to Congress and state legislators:  “You can impose a reasonable limit on how much a contributor can donate to a candidate’s campaign or to committees that donate to candidates, but you cannot limit or ban what else a donor does with money.”  This message started with Buckley.  CitizensUnited made the point emphatically.  McCutcheon is a logical and consistent extension.  Advocates of greater regulation still seem to be going through the five stages of grief over the fact that many of their ideas are simply unconstitutional.  After Citizens United they went through denial and anger.  Now they are somewhere between bargaining and depression.  If they reach acceptance, the final stage, they should focus on finding constitutional ways to regulate money in politics.  Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the Court, suggested mandatory public disclosure, solicitation rules and restrictions on transfers between and among committees in addition to existing rules.  Of course any laws  must avoid vagueness and overbreadth.  But the ultimate goal should be to promote transparency, avoid unnecessary burdens, and provide avenues for sufficient funding of political debate and associational activities.  The McCutcheon decision simply underscores that such goals can be accomplished without violating the First Amendment and without jeopardizing democracy.


Jan Witold Baran is a partner at Wiley Rein LLP where he heads the Election Law and Government Ethics Group.  He has argued four Supreme Court cases and represented parties in several others.  His amicus brief in Citizens United on behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce was cited by the Court in its opinion.  He is the author of The Election Law Primer for Corporations, published by the American Bar Association.


In association with Bloomberg Law




SCOTUSblog



Symposium: McCutcheon and the future of campaign finance regulation

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

What the New Campaign Finance Ruling Means


(Newser) – The Supreme Court today struck down longstanding rules capping the total money individuals can donate to politicians, parties, and certain PACs. What does it mean and who does it benefit? Here’s a taste of the reaction pouring in from pundits, advocates, and leaders:


  • The court “pressed ahead with the majority’s constitutional view that more money flowing into politics is a good thing—even if much of it comes from rich donors,” writes Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSBlog. While the ruling “was not as sweeping” as Citizens United, “the practical result of the new ruling is almost sure to be that wealthy individuals … will be able to spread their money around among more candidates and political groups.”

  • The ruling “appears like a winner for the Republican Party,” which has a “wider base of mega-donors,” observe Mark Murray and Carrie Dann at NBC. But they note that money doesn’t always buy victory—Barack Obama was outspent in 2012—and that parties typically adapt to these changes, negating any advantage before long.

  • John Boehner nonetheless celebrated the decision. “Freedom of speech is being upheld,” he told reporters, according to Politico. “You all have the freedom to write what you want to write, donors ought to have the freedom to give what they want to give.” Mitch McConnell agreed, stressing that the ruling “does not permit one more dime to be given to an individual candidate.”

  • Democrat Patrick Leahy, meanwhile, said the court’s various moves “have eviscerated our campaign finance laws, while Chuck Schumer called the ruling “a small step, but another step on the road to ruination.”

  • Reform advocates are livid, the New York Daily News reports. “The Court has reversed nearly 40 years of its own precedents, laid out a welcome mat for corruption, and turned its back on the lessons learned from the Watergate scandal,” complained the president of Common Cause.

  • John Roberts’ opinion makes the interesting argument that this will be good for transparency, since more money that would have flowed to unlimited super PACs will now flow to parties and candidates, David Weigel at Slate points out. But he has trouble buying it. “The largest donors in politics have hundreds of millions of dollars to throw around. Are the managers of super PACs truly worried about losing out if those donors can also max out to candidates and parties?”

  • Paul Campos at Salon sees this as a sign that all campaign finance restrictions are doomed. “If the Koch brothers want the First Amendment to mean that rich people have a constitutional right to buy unlimited political influence,” they can use their money to “guarantee that five people who sincerely agree with them on this point will be sitting on the Supreme Court.”




Politics from Newser



What the New Campaign Finance Ruling Means

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Ukrainian womens’ campaign for sex embargo against Russian men becomes online hit

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Ukrainian womens’ campaign for sex embargo against Russian men becomes online hit

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Michelle Obama Supports Campaign to Ban ‘Sexist’ Words


Language Police: FLOTUS channels Orwell’s 1984


Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
March 11, 2014


Taking a page out of George Orwell’s 1984 - where words were banned by a totalitarian state to limit thought – Michelle Obama has thrown her weight behind a campaign to ban the word “bossy”.


FLOTUS tweeted her support for the campaign, which is receiving national media attention having been backed by celebrities such as Beyonce. Apparently, Beyonce (as well as Sony Entertainment which also supports the campaign) isn’t too concerned about the fact that her husband – and the Obama’s close personal friend Jay-Z - routinely refers to women as “bitches” and all kinds of other vulgarities in his songs.


Critics immediately shot back at Obama for lending her support to such a chilling notion, making comparisons to Orwell’s infamous ‘Ingsoc’.


“Girls are less interested in leadership than boys and that’s because they worried about being called bossy,” claims the campaign video. The solution is to ban the word altogether by encouraging parents, employers and teachers to strip it from their vocabulary and re-educate any poor unsuspecting bigot who dares utter it in public.


Illustrating once more how feminism is a top-down tool of cultural marxism – where language and culture takes the blame for all oppression thereby absolving the state, which is the true source of oppression – the campaign is the work of LeanIn.org, which itself is supported by a plethora of big banks, transnational corporations and PR firms.


Second wave feminism does little or nothing to advance genuine women’s right concerns – such as the recent designation of female drivers as potential terrorists in Saudi Arabia – and everything to hide behind the veil of equality as a justification for trampling on everyone’s free speech rights.


Given that literature is replete with examples of sexist, patriarchal and outdated language, forget just banning words, why don’t we start burning books? It’s for the children!


Mainstream feminism’s disdain for free speech is setting the stage for Hillary Clinton’s tilt at the presidency in 2016, which is why top Democratic Party operates like Debbie Wasserman Schultz are also backing these kind of PR campaigns.


Just as critics of Obama were labeled racists for questioning his policies, Hillary’s detractors will be smeared with the “sexist” tag when they dare to speak out.


The ‘ban bossy’ campaign video, featured below, is fast being overtaken by negative comments as the whole farce is rightly condemned for what it is – an onerous attempt to set a dangerous precedent of banning words and restricting free speech in order to fix non-issues contrived by cultural marxists.


Then again, I may just be a sexist thought criminal who needs to be re-educated and have his vocabulary forcibly reduced by means of a full frontal lobotomy – after all, it’s trendy and liberal!


Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet


*********************


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.


This article was posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 at 2:21 pm


Tags: domestic news, police state










Infowars



Michelle Obama Supports Campaign to Ban ‘Sexist’ Words

Monday, February 24, 2014

RO KHANNA: I"M NO TECHIE – Reid"s 2014 game plan: Dash of bipartisanship – McCAUL: EXTRADITE "EL CHAPO" -- Clinton stars in Grimes"s campaign -- Trivia


By Scott Wong (swong@politico.com or @scottwongDC)


RO KHANNA: I’M NO TECHIE – The former Obama administration official taking on fellow Democrat and veteran Rep. Mike Honda in Silicon Valley, may have Sheryl Sandberg, Marissa Mayer and Eric Schmidt in his corner. Just don’t call him a techie. 


In an wide-ranging interview with Huddle at a Starbucks near Apple’s headquarters in Cupertino, Calif., Ro Khanna went out of his way to distance himself from the “techie” label that’s defined his campaign for the past year.  “I’m not an entrepreneur. I’m not a CEO. I’ve never started a company. I’ve got a middle-class background and am still paying off student loans. I went to public schools. If anything, I took more philosophy and economics classes than computer science and technology classes. … My voice is not one of Silicon Valley. Because of my life experiences, I see some of these structural changes taking place, globalization, technology, and I have ideas about how we can allow middle-class families and their kids to participate in this economy. …


– “I’m not a techie. I wish I were. I wish I were worth a billion dollars and started a company. … I have access to people who are technology leaders and thought leaders but I come from the perspective of someone who is not part of that world. And I’ve criticized tech companies for a lack of representation of Asian Americans at their highest ranks, with a lack of women, with a lack of African American and Latino employees. … I’m not supporting the pack policy interest of these companies.


– Khanna, 37, a patent lawyer and former deputy assistant secretary in the Commerce Department, knocked Honda for having a thin legislative record and failing to articulate any sort of economic vision for the future. But Khanna acknowledged that he had praised the seven-term congressman publicly in the past: “I said Mike Honda is an honorable person who’s had a distinguished career in public service. I’ve said he’s been a go-to person on national Asian American issues. I believe that Mike Honda has helped national Asian American candidates run for office, people like Ami Bera. … I just don’t think he’s understands or is the right leader to represent Silicon Valley. And I don’t think there is any intellectual inconsistency with that. …


– “He has focused on issues of civil liberties and civil rights. So there is a complete difference in expertise and focus in what we want to achieve. It’s up to the voters to decide whose experience and background better matches the times and the district. My view is that this district — which is the heart of Apple, Yahoo, Intel, Cisco, LinkedIn, Google, Tesla and middle class folks from all of those areas — will pick someone with economic expertise and background.


– While Khanna thinks it’s time for Honda to go, he wouldn’t say the same for other longtime Silicon Valley Democrats: “I think Anna Eshoo is very different. She has called for transparency in the procurement process. Recently, she was outspoken as a leader when the NSA debate happened. She would have the support of almost all the tech leaders who are supporting me. Many of them would support Zoe Lofgren. … They know Anna Eshoo, they like Anna Eshoo, they think Anna Eshoo has been a champion for Silicon Valley. It is night and day. She’s far more effective, and Zoe has done substantive work on SOPA and PIPA.”


REID’S 2014 GAME PLAN: SOME BIPARTISANSHIP – Burgess Everett writes for POLITICO: “Harry Reid is aiming for a dash of bipartisanship in his election-year game plan. The Senate majority leader will still push long-shot measures, like paycheck fairness and hiking the minimum wage, designed to appeal to his party’s base. But now he’s considering taking up bills that some Republicans actually support, too, like a manufacturing bill and a prison reform measure. It’s a marked shift from the widely held belief among members of both parties that Senate Democrats will hold votes this year only on proposals that stress their political message — a strategy in line with the Nevada Democrat’s goal of keeping the Senate in Democratic hands in the 2014 election. … Passing some bills — even if they’re modest ones — could help rehabilitate the image of the entire chamber, which has grown more bitterly partisan since Reid last fall activated the ‘nuclear option’ rules change that eliminated filibusters on most presidential nominees.” http://politi.co/1fv237w


** Republicans and Democrats finally agree! Congress has bipartisan legislation to repeal Medicare’s broken funding formula. But not if Congress gives up before the March 31 deadline. SGR is the problem; H.R. 4015 and S. 2000 are the solution. FixMedicareNow.org


GOVERNORS: TOUGH ROAD FOR OBAMACARE REPEAL – Steve Peoples and Ken Thomas report for the Associated Press: “The explosive politics of health care have divided the nation, but America’s governors, Republicans and Democrats alike, suggest that President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul is here to stay. While governors from Connecticut to Louisiana sparred Sunday over how best to improve the nation’s economy, governors of both parties shared a far more pragmatic outlook on the controversial program known as ‘Obamacare’ as millions of their constituents begin to be covered. ‘We’re just trying to make the best of a bad situation,’ said Republican Gov. Terry Branstad of Iowa, who called the health care law ‘unaffordable and unsustainable’ yet something he has to implement by law. …  [G]overnors from both parties say a full repeal of the law would be complicated at best, if not impossible, as states move forward with implementation and begin covering millions of people…” http://bit.ly/1h52WnS


EGYPT’S MILITARY-BACKED GOVERNMENT RESIGNS – Reuters’ Yasmine Saleh and Asma Alsharif report from Cairo: “Egypt’s government has resigned, the prime minister said on Monday, paving the way for army chief Field Marshal Abdel Fattah al-Sisi to declare his candidacy for president of a strategic U.S. ally gripped by political strife. … For Sisi to run for president he would first need to leave his post as defense minister. ‘This (government resignation) was done as a step that was needed ahead of Sisi’s announcement that he will run for president,’ an Egyptian official said. He told Reuters that the cabinet had resigned en masse as Sisi did not want to appear to be acting alone.” http://reut.rs/1gvZSyC


CLINTON STARS IN GRIMES’S CAMPAIGN – Philip Rucker on A1 of the Washington Post: “During Bill Clinton’s first-inaugural festivities, a 14-year-old girl from Kentucky presented the new president with an honorary bouquet of red roses at the base of the Lincoln Memorial. Two decades later, that girl, Alison Lundergan Grimes, is a candidate to become Kentucky’s first female senator. And Clinton — an uncle figure whom Grimes counts as a friend, mentor and adviser — is playing a starring role in her campaign and will appear at a sold-out Grimes fundraiser Tuesday.


– “As Grimes weighed whether to run for the Senate, Clinton took nearly an hour out of a visit last year to Owensboro, Ky., to huddle privately with her. Hillary Rodham Clinton provided her counsel as well. They both offered their unconditional support and talked about how much fight it will take for a Democrat to unseat Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, a wily campaigner known for vilifying his opponents. ‘I think what the Clinton family, from President Clinton to Secretary Clinton, and I have in common is that we don’t scare easy — no matter the bully,’ Grimes said in an interview. …


– “Grimes is living proof that the Clintons, both now out of office, remain the first family in Democratic politics. At 35, Grimes is just 15 months older than their daughter, Chelsea Clinton, and is practically the Clintons’ political offspring. A win in November would demonstrate the appeal of Clintonian centrism in Republican territory.” http://wapo.st/1gv5dpT


UNDER DeMINT, HERITAGE SHIFTS FROM POLICY TO POLITICS – Jennifer Steinhauer and Jonathan Weisman write on A1 of the New York Times: “Not long after Jim DeMint took over the Heritage Foundation last spring, his team summoned the staff for a meeting unlike any the decorous conservative policy organization had ever convened. Music blared in the auditorium. Policy analysts began with a few awkward jokes and then scampered about in a series of skits that laid out the foundation’s goals. Some of the veteran managers of the staid think tank stared on balefully. A new era had arrived. From its inception in 1973, the Heritage Foundation has provided the blueprint for the Republican Party’s ideas in Washington. In doing so, it has proved to be the most durable organization of its kind. But under Mr. DeMint, a South Carolinian who gave up his Senate seat last year to take the helm, Heritage has shifted. Long known as an incubator for policy ideas and the embodiment of the party establishment, it has become more of a political organization feeding off the rising populism of the Tea Party movement.” http://nyti.ms/1fh70fL


GOOD MONDAY MORNING, FEB. 24, 2014, and welcome to The Huddle, your-play-play preview of all the action on Capitol Hill. Send tips, suggestions, comments, complaints and corrections to swong@politico.com. If you don’t already, please follow me on Twitter @scottwongDC.


My new followers include @AdamWollner and @mateagold.


MANY THANKS to my colleagues Ginger Gibson and Seung Min Kim for filling in for me last week.


TODAY IN CONGRESS – The House returns from its Presidents’ Day recess on Tuesday. The Senate is back at 2 p.m. today, at which time Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) will be recognized to read George Washington’s Farewell Address. At 5:30 p.m., the Senate will vote on the nomination of Jeffrey Alker Meyer to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.


AROUND THE HILL – Sen. Tim Kaine, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Near Eastern and Central and South Asian Affairs, holds a conference call at 4:30 p.m. to discuss his visits to Israel, the West Bank, Lebanon and Egypt. RSVP to amy_dudley@kaine.senate.gov. At 9:30 a.m. Tuesday, Sens. Tim Scott and Cory Booker and former Sens. Carol Moseley Braun, Roland Burris and William “Mo” Cowan  mark Black History Month with a panel titled “Honoring our Past and Celebrating our Future: Discussing Personal Journeys and a Nation’s Progress with America’s Black Senators,”  at the Jefferson Building of the Library of Congress. RSVP to rsvp@scott.senate.gov or Scott_Press@scott.senate.gov by 2 p.m. today.  On Thursday morning, Sen. Bob Corker speaks at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast at the St. Regis Hotel.


SUNDAY, SUNDAY, SUNDAY


– McCAUL: EXTRADITE ‘EL CHAPO’ – Rep. Mike McCaul, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, is urging Mexico to consider extraditing alleged drug lord Joaquín Guzmán Loera — also known as El Chapo — to the United States for prosecution, reports POLITICO’s Byron Tau: “I would ask that the Mexicans consider extraditing him to the United States, where he would be put into a super-max prison under tight security where he cannot escape,” McCaul (R-Texas) said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”  Guzmán was apprehended in a beachfront condo Saturday by Mexican marines and police, aided by U.S. law enforcement agencies. http://politi.co/1cH7sY6


– SEN. JOHN McCAIN said the violent uprising in Ukraine should make Russian President Vladimir Putin “nervous” about his own leadership in Russia,” writes POLITICO’s Trevor Eischen. “They want to be western,” the Arizona Republican, appearing on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” said of the Ukrainian people. “They don’t want to be eastern.” http://politi.co/1c0Vgn3


– NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER SUSAN RICE said Sunday she has no regrets about her now-infamous round of TV interviews in 2012 about the attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, Byron Tau writes. Asked by NBC’s “Meet the Press” host David Gregory if she had any regrets about the interviews, Rice replied: “No.”  “Because what I said to you that morning, and what I did every day since, was to share the best information that we had at the time,” Rice said. http://politi.co/1nYpl6B


KANSAS SENATE HOPEFUL POSTED GRISLY X-RAY IMAGES – Tim Carpenter writes for the Topeka Capital-Journal: “U.S. Senate candidate Milton Wolf posted a collection of gruesome X-ray images of gunshot fatalities and medical injuries to his Facebook page and participated in online commentary layered with macabre jokes and descriptions of  carnage. Wolf, a Johnson County radiologist anchoring a campaign for the Republican nomination with calls for federal heath care reform, said in an interview the medical images were legally uploaded to public social media sites and other online venues for educational purposes. They also served, he said, to demonstrate evil lurking in the world. However, Wolf and others viewing these Facebook postings relentlessly poked fun at the dead or wounded. The gunshot victim, Wolf joked online, wasn’t going to complain about the awkward positioning of his head for an X-ray.” http://bit.ly/1lbAYKy


– Wolf later acknowledged Sunday that he posted “insensitive” comments online, which he described as “mistakes.” James Hohmann in POLITICO: http://politi.co/1gtTwjl


LANDRIEU SEEKS SUPPORT FROM INDEPENDENTS, CONSERVATIVES – The AP’s Bill Barrow in Lafayette, La.: “Democrat Mary Landrieu’s quest for a fourth Senate term will turn on whether she can attract just enough support from independents and Republicans to win in this increasingly conservative state. The daughter and sister of New Orleans mayors, that’s been Landrieu’s re-election strategy since 2002, when her donors included a Baton Rouge physician named Bill Cassidy, now her Republican challenger in this year’s midterm elections. Replicating that winning formula could depend on what matters more to voters: Landrieu’s growing ability to help Louisiana’s oil and gas industry through her recent promotion to chairwoman of the Senate Energy and National Resources Committee or her unapologetic vote for President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul. …


-- “In this race, allegiances don’t fall neatly along party lines. ‘I’m a die-hard Republican, but I love Mary Landrieu,’ said Lafayette resident Mark Miller, who owns and runs multiple Louisiana-based companies that drill and offer support services to other energy companies. ‘You can’t overstate what it means for this state to have her experience and influence, especially with the energy chairmanship.’” http://yhoo.it/1k3jixj


SCOTT BROWN, MAN OF MYSTERY – James Hohmann writes for POLITICO: “Scott Brown performed with the band Cheap Trick at a concert in Massachusetts last weekend, strumming his guitar along as they played ‘Surrender.’ Two weeks earlier, a shirtless picture of him at a polar bear swim appeared on the cover of New Hampshire’s largest newspaper. On Thursday, a conservative blog reported that the former senator will keynote an April GOP fundraiser … in Iowa. If Brown plans to challenge Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), something he’s flirted with for the better part of a year now, the former Massachusetts senator has chosen a very unusual way to lay the groundwork. But those who know the 54-year-old Republican say it doesn’t mean he won’t. He’s just a one-man band who will do it on his own terms and timetable.


– “Half a dozen people who have spoken with Brown recently about his future say he is genuinely conflicted about whether to run. Several of them said Brown thinks he has until April to make up his mind, or possibly even closer to the June 13 filing deadline. But another person familiar with his thinking cautioned an announcement might come as early as the first week of March. …  Unique, detached, aloof — call it what you like. ‘Doing what I said I would do,’ Brown emailed POLITICO nonchalantly last week, in response to the latest query about what he’s up to. ‘I’m settling in, adjusting, introducing myself and helping … Keep you posted.’” http://politi.co/1pi5C5m


THE POLITICAL AFTERLIFE – The University of Minnesota’s Eric Ostermeier writes on his “Smart Politics” blog that a dozen retiring, ex- or deceased members of Congress still have active campaign websites: “One announced his retirement last September. Another died in October. One resigned last week. A dozen members of Congress that aren’t running for reelection still have active campaign websites – that accept financial donations … A Smart Politics analysis finds that through February 23rd, a dozen U.S. Representatives from the 113th Congress who have announced their retirements, resigned, or died in office still have campaign websites that actively solicit campaign contributions. The most eyebrow-raising among these is the reelection website of former 22-term Florida Republican Bill Young. Young died last October 18th and a special election to fill his seat will be held in less than a month.” http://bit.ly/MnT0K6


CURTAIN CLOSES ON SOCHI, RUSSIA BREATHES SIGH OF RELIEF – Sarah Lyall writes on A1 of the NYT: “Russia had so much to prove at the Winter Games. Was spending however-many billions of dollars to build an Olympics-industrial complex from scratch on the edge of the Black Sea worth it? How could the country overcome a thicket of potential problems: security worries, logistical obstacles, weather annoyances and the darkening specter of revolution in nearby Ukraine? The closing ceremony on Sunday night was advertised as a celebration of Russian culture and heritage: a grand party to show off the work of distinguished Russian musicians, dancers, artists and authors through the centuries. But it seemed as much a great sigh of happy relief as anything else. Russia had done it. It had held an Olympics that were safe and secure and that, thrillingly to the home fans, demonstrated the restoration of Russia’s athletic might. Four years after finishing the Vancouver Games with less than half as many medals as the United States, Russia won the most: 33. Almost overnight, it seemed, the mood in Russia shifted, from a kind of grumbling fatalism to a burst of national pride.” http://nyti.ms/1bE45Tq


FRIDAY’S TRIVIA WINNER – Todd Metcalf was the first to correctly answer that John Kerry is the current sitting Cabinet member who received a degree from Boston College.


TODAY’S TRIVIA – With spring training underway, Claude Marx pitches a baseball question: The grandchild of what presidential aide turned secretary of state became an owner of a New York City sports team? Name the secretary of state, the team owner and team name. The first person to correctly answer gets a mention in the next day’s Huddle. Email me at swong@politico.com.


GET HUDDLE emailed to your Blackberry, iPhone or other mobile device each morning. Just enter your email address where it says “Sign Up.” http://www.politico.com/huddle/


** After years of saying “wait until next year,” Congress finally has bipartisan legislation to repeal Medicare’s broken funding formula. This is the news seniors have been waiting for.  But we’re not over the finish line yet. Congress must act by March 31st to avoid another costly temporary patch. Let’s pass H.R. 4015/S. 2000, scrap the broken SGR formula and fix Medicare once and for all! FixMedicareNow.org




POLITICO – Top 10 – Huddle



RO KHANNA: I"M NO TECHIE – Reid"s 2014 game plan: Dash of bipartisanship – McCAUL: EXTRADITE "EL CHAPO" -- Clinton stars in Grimes"s campaign -- Trivia

RO KHANNA: I"M NO TECHIE – Reid"s 2014 game plan: Dash of bipartisanship – McCAUL: EXTRADITE "EL CHAPO" -- Clinton stars in Grimes"s campaign -- Trivia


By Scott Wong (swong@politico.com or @scottwongDC)


RO KHANNA: I’M NO TECHIE – The former Obama administration official taking on fellow Democrat and veteran Rep. Mike Honda in Silicon Valley, may have Sheryl Sandberg, Marissa Mayer and Eric Schmidt in his corner. Just don’t call him a techie. 


In an wide-ranging interview with Huddle at a Starbucks near Apple’s headquarters in Cupertino, Calif., Ro Khanna went out of his way to distance himself from the “techie” label that’s defined his campaign for the past year.  “I’m not an entrepreneur. I’m not a CEO. I’ve never started a company. I’ve got a middle-class background and am still paying off student loans. I went to public schools. If anything, I took more philosophy and economics classes than computer science and technology classes. … My voice is not one of Silicon Valley. Because of my life experiences, I see some of these structural changes taking place, globalization, technology, and I have ideas about how we can allow middle-class families and their kids to participate in this economy. …


– “I’m not a techie. I wish I were. I wish I were worth a billion dollars and started a company. … I have access to people who are technology leaders and thought leaders but I come from the perspective of someone who is not part of that world. And I’ve criticized tech companies for a lack of representation of Asian Americans at their highest ranks, with a lack of women, with a lack of African American and Latino employees. … I’m not supporting the pack policy interest of these companies.


– Khanna, 37, a patent lawyer and former deputy assistant secretary in the Commerce Department, knocked Honda for having a thin legislative record and failing to articulate any sort of economic vision for the future. But Khanna acknowledged that he had praised the seven-term congressman publicly in the past: “I said Mike Honda is an honorable person who’s had a distinguished career in public service. I’ve said he’s been a go-to person on national Asian American issues. I believe that Mike Honda has helped national Asian American candidates run for office, people like Ami Bera. … I just don’t think he’s understands or is the right leader to represent Silicon Valley. And I don’t think there is any intellectual inconsistency with that. …


– “He has focused on issues of civil liberties and civil rights. So there is a complete difference in expertise and focus in what we want to achieve. It’s up to the voters to decide whose experience and background better matches the times and the district. My view is that this district — which is the heart of Apple, Yahoo, Intel, Cisco, LinkedIn, Google, Tesla and middle class folks from all of those areas — will pick someone with economic expertise and background.


– While Khanna thinks it’s time for Honda to go, he wouldn’t say the same for other longtime Silicon Valley Democrats: “I think Anna Eshoo is very different. She has called for transparency in the procurement process. Recently, she was outspoken as a leader when the NSA debate happened. She would have the support of almost all the tech leaders who are supporting me. Many of them would support Zoe Lofgren. … They know Anna Eshoo, they like Anna Eshoo, they think Anna Eshoo has been a champion for Silicon Valley. It is night and day. She’s far more effective, and Zoe has done substantive work on SOPA and PIPA.”


REID’S 2014 GAME PLAN: SOME BIPARTISANSHIP – Burgess Everett writes for POLITICO: “Harry Reid is aiming for a dash of bipartisanship in his election-year game plan. The Senate majority leader will still push long-shot measures, like paycheck fairness and hiking the minimum wage, designed to appeal to his party’s base. But now he’s considering taking up bills that some Republicans actually support, too, like a manufacturing bill and a prison reform measure. It’s a marked shift from the widely held belief among members of both parties that Senate Democrats will hold votes this year only on proposals that stress their political message — a strategy in line with the Nevada Democrat’s goal of keeping the Senate in Democratic hands in the 2014 election. … Passing some bills — even if they’re modest ones — could help rehabilitate the image of the entire chamber, which has grown more bitterly partisan since Reid last fall activated the ‘nuclear option’ rules change that eliminated filibusters on most presidential nominees.” http://politi.co/1fv237w


** Republicans and Democrats finally agree! Congress has bipartisan legislation to repeal Medicare’s broken funding formula. But not if Congress gives up before the March 31 deadline. SGR is the problem; H.R. 4015 and S. 2000 are the solution. FixMedicareNow.org


GOVERNORS: TOUGH ROAD FOR OBAMACARE REPEAL – Steve Peoples and Ken Thomas report for the Associated Press: “The explosive politics of health care have divided the nation, but America’s governors, Republicans and Democrats alike, suggest that President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul is here to stay. While governors from Connecticut to Louisiana sparred Sunday over how best to improve the nation’s economy, governors of both parties shared a far more pragmatic outlook on the controversial program known as ‘Obamacare’ as millions of their constituents begin to be covered. ‘We’re just trying to make the best of a bad situation,’ said Republican Gov. Terry Branstad of Iowa, who called the health care law ‘unaffordable and unsustainable’ yet something he has to implement by law. …  [G]overnors from both parties say a full repeal of the law would be complicated at best, if not impossible, as states move forward with implementation and begin covering millions of people…” http://bit.ly/1h52WnS


EGYPT’S MILITARY-BACKED GOVERNMENT RESIGNS – Reuters’ Yasmine Saleh and Asma Alsharif report from Cairo: “Egypt’s government has resigned, the prime minister said on Monday, paving the way for army chief Field Marshal Abdel Fattah al-Sisi to declare his candidacy for president of a strategic U.S. ally gripped by political strife. … For Sisi to run for president he would first need to leave his post as defense minister. ‘This (government resignation) was done as a step that was needed ahead of Sisi’s announcement that he will run for president,’ an Egyptian official said. He told Reuters that the cabinet had resigned en masse as Sisi did not want to appear to be acting alone.” http://reut.rs/1gvZSyC


CLINTON STARS IN GRIMES’S CAMPAIGN – Philip Rucker on A1 of the Washington Post: “During Bill Clinton’s first-inaugural festivities, a 14-year-old girl from Kentucky presented the new president with an honorary bouquet of red roses at the base of the Lincoln Memorial. Two decades later, that girl, Alison Lundergan Grimes, is a candidate to become Kentucky’s first female senator. And Clinton — an uncle figure whom Grimes counts as a friend, mentor and adviser — is playing a starring role in her campaign and will appear at a sold-out Grimes fundraiser Tuesday.


– “As Grimes weighed whether to run for the Senate, Clinton took nearly an hour out of a visit last year to Owensboro, Ky., to huddle privately with her. Hillary Rodham Clinton provided her counsel as well. They both offered their unconditional support and talked about how much fight it will take for a Democrat to unseat Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, a wily campaigner known for vilifying his opponents. ‘I think what the Clinton family, from President Clinton to Secretary Clinton, and I have in common is that we don’t scare easy — no matter the bully,’ Grimes said in an interview. …


– “Grimes is living proof that the Clintons, both now out of office, remain the first family in Democratic politics. At 35, Grimes is just 15 months older than their daughter, Chelsea Clinton, and is practically the Clintons’ political offspring. A win in November would demonstrate the appeal of Clintonian centrism in Republican territory.” http://wapo.st/1gv5dpT


UNDER DeMINT, HERITAGE SHIFTS FROM POLICY TO POLITICS – Jennifer Steinhauer and Jonathan Weisman write on A1 of the New York Times: “Not long after Jim DeMint took over the Heritage Foundation last spring, his team summoned the staff for a meeting unlike any the decorous conservative policy organization had ever convened. Music blared in the auditorium. Policy analysts began with a few awkward jokes and then scampered about in a series of skits that laid out the foundation’s goals. Some of the veteran managers of the staid think tank stared on balefully. A new era had arrived. From its inception in 1973, the Heritage Foundation has provided the blueprint for the Republican Party’s ideas in Washington. In doing so, it has proved to be the most durable organization of its kind. But under Mr. DeMint, a South Carolinian who gave up his Senate seat last year to take the helm, Heritage has shifted. Long known as an incubator for policy ideas and the embodiment of the party establishment, it has become more of a political organization feeding off the rising populism of the Tea Party movement.” http://nyti.ms/1fh70fL


GOOD MONDAY MORNING, FEB. 24, 2014, and welcome to The Huddle, your-play-play preview of all the action on Capitol Hill. Send tips, suggestions, comments, complaints and corrections to swong@politico.com. If you don’t already, please follow me on Twitter @scottwongDC.


My new followers include @AdamWollner and @mateagold.


MANY THANKS to my colleagues Ginger Gibson and Seung Min Kim for filling in for me last week.


TODAY IN CONGRESS – The House returns from its Presidents’ Day recess on Tuesday. The Senate is back at 2 p.m. today, at which time Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) will be recognized to read George Washington’s Farewell Address. At 5:30 p.m., the Senate will vote on the nomination of Jeffrey Alker Meyer to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.


AROUND THE HILL – Sen. Tim Kaine, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Near Eastern and Central and South Asian Affairs, holds a conference call at 4:30 p.m. to discuss his visits to Israel, the West Bank, Lebanon and Egypt. RSVP to amy_dudley@kaine.senate.gov. At 9:30 a.m. Tuesday, Sens. Tim Scott and Cory Booker and former Sens. Carol Moseley Braun, Roland Burris and William “Mo” Cowan  mark Black History Month with a panel titled “Honoring our Past and Celebrating our Future: Discussing Personal Journeys and a Nation’s Progress with America’s Black Senators,”  at the Jefferson Building of the Library of Congress. RSVP to rsvp@scott.senate.gov or Scott_Press@scott.senate.gov by 2 p.m. today.  On Thursday morning, Sen. Bob Corker speaks at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast at the St. Regis Hotel.


SUNDAY, SUNDAY, SUNDAY


– McCAUL: EXTRADITE ‘EL CHAPO’ – Rep. Mike McCaul, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, is urging Mexico to consider extraditing alleged drug lord Joaquín Guzmán Loera — also known as El Chapo — to the United States for prosecution, reports POLITICO’s Byron Tau: “I would ask that the Mexicans consider extraditing him to the United States, where he would be put into a super-max prison under tight security where he cannot escape,” McCaul (R-Texas) said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”  Guzmán was apprehended in a beachfront condo Saturday by Mexican marines and police, aided by U.S. law enforcement agencies. http://politi.co/1cH7sY6


– SEN. JOHN McCAIN said the violent uprising in Ukraine should make Russian President Vladimir Putin “nervous” about his own leadership in Russia,” writes POLITICO’s Trevor Eischen. “They want to be western,” the Arizona Republican, appearing on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” said of the Ukrainian people. “They don’t want to be eastern.” http://politi.co/1c0Vgn3


– NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER SUSAN RICE said Sunday she has no regrets about her now-infamous round of TV interviews in 2012 about the attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, Byron Tau writes. Asked by NBC’s “Meet the Press” host David Gregory if she had any regrets about the interviews, Rice replied: “No.”  “Because what I said to you that morning, and what I did every day since, was to share the best information that we had at the time,” Rice said. http://politi.co/1nYpl6B


KANSAS SENATE HOPEFUL POSTED GRISLY X-RAY IMAGES – Tim Carpenter writes for the Topeka Capital-Journal: “U.S. Senate candidate Milton Wolf posted a collection of gruesome X-ray images of gunshot fatalities and medical injuries to his Facebook page and participated in online commentary layered with macabre jokes and descriptions of  carnage. Wolf, a Johnson County radiologist anchoring a campaign for the Republican nomination with calls for federal heath care reform, said in an interview the medical images were legally uploaded to public social media sites and other online venues for educational purposes. They also served, he said, to demonstrate evil lurking in the world. However, Wolf and others viewing these Facebook postings relentlessly poked fun at the dead or wounded. The gunshot victim, Wolf joked online, wasn’t going to complain about the awkward positioning of his head for an X-ray.” http://bit.ly/1lbAYKy


– Wolf later acknowledged Sunday that he posted “insensitive” comments online, which he described as “mistakes.” James Hohmann in POLITICO: http://politi.co/1gtTwjl


LANDRIEU SEEKS SUPPORT FROM INDEPENDENTS, CONSERVATIVES – The AP’s Bill Barrow in Lafayette, La.: “Democrat Mary Landrieu’s quest for a fourth Senate term will turn on whether she can attract just enough support from independents and Republicans to win in this increasingly conservative state. The daughter and sister of New Orleans mayors, that’s been Landrieu’s re-election strategy since 2002, when her donors included a Baton Rouge physician named Bill Cassidy, now her Republican challenger in this year’s midterm elections. Replicating that winning formula could depend on what matters more to voters: Landrieu’s growing ability to help Louisiana’s oil and gas industry through her recent promotion to chairwoman of the Senate Energy and National Resources Committee or her unapologetic vote for President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul. …


-- “In this race, allegiances don’t fall neatly along party lines. ‘I’m a die-hard Republican, but I love Mary Landrieu,’ said Lafayette resident Mark Miller, who owns and runs multiple Louisiana-based companies that drill and offer support services to other energy companies. ‘You can’t overstate what it means for this state to have her experience and influence, especially with the energy chairmanship.’” http://yhoo.it/1k3jixj


SCOTT BROWN, MAN OF MYSTERY – James Hohmann writes for POLITICO: “Scott Brown performed with the band Cheap Trick at a concert in Massachusetts last weekend, strumming his guitar along as they played ‘Surrender.’ Two weeks earlier, a shirtless picture of him at a polar bear swim appeared on the cover of New Hampshire’s largest newspaper. On Thursday, a conservative blog reported that the former senator will keynote an April GOP fundraiser … in Iowa. If Brown plans to challenge Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), something he’s flirted with for the better part of a year now, the former Massachusetts senator has chosen a very unusual way to lay the groundwork. But those who know the 54-year-old Republican say it doesn’t mean he won’t. He’s just a one-man band who will do it on his own terms and timetable.


– “Half a dozen people who have spoken with Brown recently about his future say he is genuinely conflicted about whether to run. Several of them said Brown thinks he has until April to make up his mind, or possibly even closer to the June 13 filing deadline. But another person familiar with his thinking cautioned an announcement might come as early as the first week of March. …  Unique, detached, aloof — call it what you like. ‘Doing what I said I would do,’ Brown emailed POLITICO nonchalantly last week, in response to the latest query about what he’s up to. ‘I’m settling in, adjusting, introducing myself and helping … Keep you posted.’” http://politi.co/1pi5C5m


THE POLITICAL AFTERLIFE – The University of Minnesota’s Eric Ostermeier writes on his “Smart Politics” blog that a dozen retiring, ex- or deceased members of Congress still have active campaign websites: “One announced his retirement last September. Another died in October. One resigned last week. A dozen members of Congress that aren’t running for reelection still have active campaign websites – that accept financial donations … A Smart Politics analysis finds that through February 23rd, a dozen U.S. Representatives from the 113th Congress who have announced their retirements, resigned, or died in office still have campaign websites that actively solicit campaign contributions. The most eyebrow-raising among these is the reelection website of former 22-term Florida Republican Bill Young. Young died last October 18th and a special election to fill his seat will be held in less than a month.” http://bit.ly/MnT0K6


CURTAIN CLOSES ON SOCHI, RUSSIA BREATHES SIGH OF RELIEF – Sarah Lyall writes on A1 of the NYT: “Russia had so much to prove at the Winter Games. Was spending however-many billions of dollars to build an Olympics-industrial complex from scratch on the edge of the Black Sea worth it? How could the country overcome a thicket of potential problems: security worries, logistical obstacles, weather annoyances and the darkening specter of revolution in nearby Ukraine? The closing ceremony on Sunday night was advertised as a celebration of Russian culture and heritage: a grand party to show off the work of distinguished Russian musicians, dancers, artists and authors through the centuries. But it seemed as much a great sigh of happy relief as anything else. Russia had done it. It had held an Olympics that were safe and secure and that, thrillingly to the home fans, demonstrated the restoration of Russia’s athletic might. Four years after finishing the Vancouver Games with less than half as many medals as the United States, Russia won the most: 33. Almost overnight, it seemed, the mood in Russia shifted, from a kind of grumbling fatalism to a burst of national pride.” http://nyti.ms/1bE45Tq


FRIDAY’S TRIVIA WINNER – Todd Metcalf was the first to correctly answer that John Kerry is the current sitting Cabinet member who received a degree from Boston College.


TODAY’S TRIVIA – With spring training underway, Claude Marx pitches a baseball question: The grandchild of what presidential aide turned secretary of state became an owner of a New York City sports team? Name the secretary of state, the team owner and team name. The first person to correctly answer gets a mention in the next day’s Huddle. Email me at swong@politico.com.


GET HUDDLE emailed to your Blackberry, iPhone or other mobile device each morning. Just enter your email address where it says “Sign Up.” http://www.politico.com/huddle/


** After years of saying “wait until next year,” Congress finally has bipartisan legislation to repeal Medicare’s broken funding formula. This is the news seniors have been waiting for.  But we’re not over the finish line yet. Congress must act by March 31st to avoid another costly temporary patch. Let’s pass H.R. 4015/S. 2000, scrap the broken SGR formula and fix Medicare once and for all! FixMedicareNow.org




POLITICO – Top 10 – Huddle



RO KHANNA: I"M NO TECHIE – Reid"s 2014 game plan: Dash of bipartisanship – McCAUL: EXTRADITE "EL CHAPO" -- Clinton stars in Grimes"s campaign -- Trivia

Saturday, February 22, 2014

WHO begins campaign against cholera in South Sudan


GENEVA – The World Health Organisation began a campaign on Saturday to prevent outbreaks of cholera in temporary camps in South Sudan housing thousands of people who have fled the country’s brutal two-month-old conflict.


The first phase will see around 94,000 people vaccinated against the disease in Minkaman camp in Awerial county, followed by 43,000 in camps around the capital Juba.


“Although currently there is not a cholera outbreak, people displaced by the recent conflict and living in the camps are at risk due to poor sanitary conditions and overcrowding,” the WHO said in a statement.


The programme is being carried out in coordination with the South Sudanese government, with the help of the Red Cross, Doctors Without Borders (MSF) and UNICEF.


“Minkaman camp and Juba camp have been selected because of the relative stability of the situation and easier access in those places,” said Dr Abdinasir Abubakar of the WHO’s disease surveillance and response team.


“We are also looking at other camps, and once the accessibility and security improves, we will expand the cholera vaccination campaigns into these areas.”


South Sudan has been embroiled in a bloody conflict since December 15, 2013 pitting troops loyal to President Salva Kiir against rebels linked to his sacked vice president Riek Machar.


The unrest in the world’s newest nation has killed thousands of people and displaced close to 900,000, including tens of thousands who have crammed into UN bases in fear of ethnic attacks by either Kiir’s Dinka tribe or Machar’s Nuer.


Cholera is an acute diarrhoeal infection caused by eating contaminated food or water, with children facing a particularly high risk of infection. It can kill in a matter of hours due to rapid dehydration.


The disease, which often breaks out around natural disasters or conflicts, affects between three million and five million people per year, with up to 120,000 dying from the disease.




Middle East Online :: Main English Channel



WHO begins campaign against cholera in South Sudan

Thursday, February 13, 2014

SPOT ON – Brilliant “Ditch Mitch” Campaign Commercial – Subtle As A Brick Through A Window

At Those Damn Liars, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Those Damn Liars and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Those Damn Liars makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Those Damn Liars does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Those Damn Liars.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Those Damn Liars and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Those Damn Liars send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Those Damn Liars has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Those Damn Liars"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


SPOT ON – Brilliant “Ditch Mitch” Campaign Commercial – Subtle As A Brick Through A Window