Showing posts with label Mail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mail. Show all posts

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Mail Delivery Halted By Threatening Chihuahua

At Hey WTF? News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Hey WTF? News and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Hey WTF? News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Hey WTF? News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Hey WTF? News.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Hey WTF? News and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Hey WTF? News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Hey WTF? News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Hey WTF? News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Mail Delivery Halted By Threatening Chihuahua

Monday, January 27, 2014

You"ve Got Mail, And It Smells Like 18th-Century Paris



Audio for this story from All Things Considered will be available at approximately 7:00 p.m. ET.








hide captionThe oPhone was on display at Wired‘s annual conference in London in October.



Courtesy of Le Laboratoire



The oPhone was on display at Wired‘s annual conference in London in October.


Courtesy of Le Laboratoire



First there was the Smell-O-Vision, a technology that brought aromas to movie theater audiences. Then there was Scratch ‘n’ Sniff, paper you could smell.


Now, a company in Paris has developed a mobile phone that sends aromatic text messages. It’s called the oPhone — “o” for olfactory.


David Edwards, the mastermind behind the oPhone, is a Harvard University professor and the founder of Le Laboratoire in Paris. He and his students thought up a way to transmit all kinds of aromas, “from bread and flowers to the smell of Paris 300 years ago,” he says.


These aromas are pre-programmed into the oPhone device, which has four small fingernail-sized chips that act as “ink cartridges for aroma,” Edwards says. Air flows through them in different ways to produce various smells.


On one end, a user can type a message and attach a related smell, and someone with an oPhone on the receiving end will get a small whiff.



Edwards says communication is just missing something without a smell. “Clearly, [there"s] a big difference between me saying to you the word ‘croissant,’ or even showing you a picture of a croissant, and you smelling a croissant,” he says.


He’s working with businesses like coffee shops to make the oPhone part of the consumer experience. Edwards says oPhones will be for sale in late fall, although you can’t record your own smells yet.


“However, being able to transmit the aroma of what I’m experiencing through a kind of a camera is imaginable, so I think that will be coming,” he says.




News



You"ve Got Mail, And It Smells Like 18th-Century Paris

Monday, December 30, 2013

Denise Robbins & Shauna Theel: Climate Change Misinformer Of The Year: The Daily Mail


The United Kingdom tabloid the Daily Mail could be dubbed “the Fox News of the Internet.” It has a huge audience, a conservative slant and has a blatant disregard for the facts. The paper wields huge power in the UK, and with its websiteplotting a U.S. expansion and reportedly receiving about 154 million global unique browsers each month, it is increasingly gaining that traction in the U.S. as well. 


The Daily Mail is best known for its celebrity gossip, but this year U.S. media turned to it for science reporting. The tabloid had huge influence in stirring up faux controversies about climate science, often shredding facts and then abandoning the damage it had done in the name of viral traffic. In fact, four times this year the Mail published climate stories that required corrections, which the paper often skirted by revising its article without a formal correction, helping the misinformation to continue to spread. In September, for example, the Mail‘s claim that Arctic sea ice had increased by 60 percent not only pushed a misleading narrative about the clear long-term decline in Arctic ice, but also got the figures wrong — the real increase was less than half that amount. Yet the claim was repeated by two U.S. Congressmen in a hearing and at least 36 different U.S. news outlets. 


For these reasons, the Mail earns the distinction of being Media Matters’ 2013 Climate Change Misinformer of the Year.


AFP/Getty Images via Mirror


The Mail’s Arctic Ice Inaccuracy Received Widespread Coverage, Even After Correction


David Rose’s Most Egregious Myth: Arctic Sea Ice Is Increasing, Proving “Global COOLING.” Daily Mail reporter David Rose, who often covers climate change in a misleading way and was previously known for uncritically repeating Weapons of Mass Destruction claims by an untrustworthy source, wrote a September 7 article titled “And now it’s global COOLING! Return of Arctic ice cap as it grows by 60% in a year.” In the article for the Daily Mail‘s sister paper, the Mail on Sunday, he claimed that Arctic sea ice levels had increased by almost one million square miles in the course of a year, citing data from the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC). [Mail On Sunday, 9/7/13] [The Guardian, 12/8/10]


Mail Was Forced To Issue A Correction After Inflating The Increase By Over 200 Percent. Journalist Bob Ward reported that the Mail‘s figure was incorrect, based on Rose’s interpretation of a typographical error on the NSIDC website and “faulty reasoning”:


Rose told me by e-mail that the source of his claim that the ice extent was 60 per cent higher this year was an announcement posted on the website of the United States National Snow and Ice Data Center on 4 September: “August 2013 ice extent was 2.38 million square kilometers (919,000 square miles) above the record low August extent in 2012. The monthly trend is -10.6% per decade relative to the 1981 to 2010 average.”


Elsewhere on its website, the NSIDC indicated that the average Arctic sea ice extent in August 2012 was a record low figure of 1.82 million square miles. This should have led Rose to claim that the Arctic sea ice was 50.5 per cent higher last month, but further faulty reasoning led him to conclude the difference was 60 per cent.


However, the NSIDC confirmed to me yesterday that the main figure used by Rose for his article was mistyped and that the mistake was corrected on 10 September, showing that Arctic sea extent in August 2013 was only 29 per cent higher than was recorded for the same month last year. [Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, 9/18/13]



Mail On Sunday subsequently corrected their article, including a headline change to “And now it’s global COOLING! Return of the Arctic ice cap as it grows by 29% in a year” (down from 60 percent). However, even disregarding the statistical error, Rose’s argument was misleading: 2012 was a record-breaking year for Arctic sea ice lows, and an increase from such an anomaly was to be expected. Nevertheless, the August 2013 sea ice extent was the sixth lowest for that month on record — a point that Rose neglected to mention. Skeptical Science illustrated the fallacy of using a single year’s data to discredit a long-term trend: 



[Skeptical Science, 9/13/13]


U.S. Media Repeated Rose’s Inaccurate Arctic Ice Claim At Least 38 Times. The false claim that Arctic sea ice had increased 60 percent was picked up by U.S. news outlets at least 38 times, including 22 instances after the correction, by 36 news outlets. These mentions primarily came from conservative media, and also includes several state outlets that published the same inaccurate column — one op-ed written by Cal Thomas (nationally syndicated columnist and Fox News contributor) appeared in 10 different news outlets, and another written by Robert L. Bradley Jr. (CEO of the fossil fuel-funded Institute for Energy Research) appeared in three. Several of the reports repeated Rose’s absurd suggestion of a long-term decline of Arctic sea ice showing that the planet is “cooling.”  Not included in our count were at least six letters to the editor that were published using his false statistic, five of which were published after the correction. [American Thinker, 9/8/13] [Bowling Green Daily News, 9/21/13, via Factiva] [Breitbart, 9/8/13] [Bristol Herald-Courier, 9/21/13, via Factiva] [Casa Grande Dispatch, 9/21/13, via Factiva] [CNS News, 9/13/13] [Fox News Channel, Cashin In, 12/14/13]  [Daily Caller, 9/8/13] [Daily Review Atlas10/3/13] [Examiner, 9/17/13[FoxNews.com, 9/9/13] [Hawaii Reporter10/9/13] [Hot Air, 9/8/13] [Idaho State Journal10/8/13] [Independent Journal Review, 9/8/13] [Investors" Business Daily, 9/9/13] [Investors" Business Daily, 9/24/13] [Investors" Business Daily, 9/26/13] [Jefferson City News-Tribune, 9/23/13, via Factiva] [Premiere Radio Networks, The Rush Limbaugh Show9/9/13] [McClatchy-Tribune Regional News, 9/23/13, via Factiva] [MSN.com, 9/9/13] [National Review, 9/9/13] [Newsbusters, 9/8/13] [North Platte Telegraph9/12/13] [Orange County Register9/20/13] [Shreveport Times, 9/24/13, via Factiva] [Standard Journal10/28/13] [telegram.com10/3/13] [The Coeur d"Alene Press9/30/13] [The Daily-Tribune, 9/29/13] [The Desert Sun, 9/28/13, via Nexis] [Fox News Channel, The Five9/11/13 via Media Matters] [The Herald-Journal9/11/13] [The Leaf-Chronicle, 9/21/13, via Factiva] [The News Journal, 9/28/13] [The Tulsa World, 9/21/13, via Factiva]  [Fox Business, Varney & Company12/16/13] [The Virginian-Pilot & The Ledger-Star via Factiva.com, 9/20/13] [Washington Examiner, 9/18/13] [Townhall, 9/19/13] [Wilson County News10/29/13] [Pensacola (FL) News Journal, 10/5/13 and 10/5/13, via Factiva] [FoxNews.com, accessed 12/18/13] [Sourcewatch, accessed 12/18/13]


Rose’s False Number Repeated By U.S. Congressmen During Hearing. The inaccurate 60 percent Arctic increase figure was also used by two U.S. congressmen to cast doubt on climate change and argue against addressing it. In a September 18 House Energy and Power Subcommittee hearing (a hearing dubbed by Organizing for Action as “DenierPalooza”), Congressman Ed Whitfield (R-KY) stated, “I recently read an article that stated that the Arctic ice had nearly a million more square miles of ocean covered with ice than at this time of year,” and Congressman David McKinley (R-WV) asserted that “Arctic ice has actually grown 60 percent.” [Media Matters, 9/19/13]


The Daily Mail Published Three More Climate Fallacies Requiring Corrections In 2013


David Rose Altered The Words Of Scientists. In an article titled “The Great Green Con no. 1: The hard proof that finally shows global warming forecasts that are costing you billions were WRONG all along,” Daily Mail journalist David Rose reported that he presented “irrefutable evidence that official predictions of global climate warming have been catastrophically flawed,” and featured quotes from four climate scientists. However, three of those four scientists subsequently criticized Rose, with two saying they were misrepresented in the article. Climate scientist Myles Allen said that Rose misrepresented his view by claiming that he now thought the world was on the course for much lower warming than he previously thought. Allen said that he “certainly never suggested to David that my assessment of the odds on any particular level of warming by 2100 had changed.” Climate scientist James Annan said that the Mail on Sunday had seemingly attributed quotes to him that he never actually said. The tabloid subsequently issued an apology for incorrectly quoting Annan, but did not address the other criticisms.  [Mail on Sunday, 3/16/13] [The Guardian, 3/20/13] [Carbon Brief, 3/19/13]


Yet some conservative U.S. media still have the misquotes on their websites, including a post by Climate Depot’s Marc Morano – Media Matters‘ 2012 climate misinformer of the year — and another by PJ Media. [Climate Depot, 3/17/13] [PJ Media, 3/19/13] [Media Matters, 12/27/12]


David Rose Fudged Numbers To Claim Climate Scientists “Confess[ed]” To Lower Warming. The Mail on Sunday published an article on September 14 originally titled “World’s top climate scientists confess: Global warming is just HALF what we thought.” In the article, reporter David Rose claimed that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was set to admit that the world is warming more slowly than previously thought. A climate scientist explained to the UK watchdog group Carbon Brief why Rose’s numbers were “completely incorrect” and that the true revision was minor — from 0.13 degrees Celsius per decade to 0.12 degrees Celsius:


The Mail on Sunday says:


“Back [in 2007], [the IPCC] said that the planet was warming at a rate of 0.2 degrees Celsius every decade … But the new report says the true figure since 1951 has been only 0.12 Celsius per decade – a rate far below even the lowest computer prediction”


Dr Richard Allan, a climate scientist at the University of Reading, tells us this statement is quite simply wrong. He says Rose has mixed up the numbers in the last IPCC report.


“The main claim by David Rose in the Mail on Sunday is that rate of global warming since 1951 has been halved since the last IPCC report. This is completely incorrect.”


In 2007, the IPCC said the rate of warming since 1951 had been not 0.2 but 0.13 degrees Celsius per decade. If the new report says 0.12 degrees Celsius, as the Mail on Sunday suggests, this is a very minor revision of 0.01 degrees.


[...]


So where does the 0.2 degree per decade figure come from? Richard Allan tells us it does appear in the last IPCC report, but refers to a 15-year period in the run up to the report’s release, not the warming per decade since 1951. He says:


“The 0.2 degrees Celsius per decade figure relates to an observed warming over the period 1990-2005 which clearly cannot be compared with the period since 1951″.


So the two figures Rose compares are not measuring the same thing. As the Met Office’s Richard Betts tweeted yesterday: “Rose created a headline by misrepresenting [the 2007 IPCC report].” [Mail on Sunday, 9/14/13] [Carbon Brief, 9/16/13]



After it was shown that Rose was comparing two numbers that measured two different things, Rose dodged responsibility by issuing a “clarification” that moved the goal posts to change the title to “global warming just QUARTER what we thought.” Despite the incorrect figures, a number of conservative media outlets amplified his claims, including:


  • Rush Limbaugh devoted significant airtime to this report, in a segment titled “Global warming scientists: We were wrong.”

  • Hot Air published an article titled “New IPCC report to retreat on global-warming claims,” leading with “At least according to the Daily Mail, which heralds the final draft report as a major step back for global-warming advocates.”

  • Breitbart published an article titled, “Leaked UN Study: 15-year ‘pause’ in global warming.” [Rush Limbaugh, 9/17/13] [Hot Air, 9/16/13] [Breitbart, 9/8/13]

Daily Mail‘s James Delingpole Slandered The Met Office, Misrepresenting Its Findings. On January 9, the Daily Mail published an article by James Delingpole — an English columnist known for dismissing the climate change consensus with inflammatory rhetoric — attacking the United Kingdom’s Met Office, one of the world’s top weather forecasting services. In it, Delingpole called the Met Office “not just risibly incompetent– but an active menace both to the integrity of science and to the nation’s wellbeing” and “Britain’s foremost cheerleader for climate change alarmism.” The Met Office issued a public statement in response on January 10, detailing the inaccuracies in Delingpole’s story:


This article contains a series of factual inaccuracies about the Met Office and its science, as outlined below.


Firstly, he claims the Met Office failed to predict snow in 2010, but our 5-day forecasts accurately forecast 12 out of 13 snowfall events – as you can see in this article.


[...]


Mr Delingpole also says we failed to predict flooding in November last year. Once again, our 5-day forecasts gave accurate guidance and warnings throughout the period.


[...]


Mr Delingpole then inaccurately states that the Met Office has conceded ‘there is no evidence that ‘global warming’ is happening’. We have not said this at any point.


In fact, we explicitly say this was not the case in an article, posted on the home page of our website and widely circulated, which was written in response to articles about updates to our decadal forecast.


[...]


He also states that the Met Office was trying to defend a narrative that the “the past ten years have been the ‘wettest decade ever’”. Again, this is not something the Met Office has ever said.


Also he quotes David Whitehouse of the Global Warming Policy Foundation saying that the Met Office ‘thinks weather forecasting is beneath it’ and that ‘climate change… brings in more money’. A cursory glance at our annual report and accounts (pdf) would reveal weather forecasting represents the vast majority of the Met Office’s contractual work on behalf of the public.


There are also a number of other accusations which cannot be substantiated.



Over two months later, the Mail finally appended a note at the bottom of the article from the Met Office Chairman on March 8. The Met said the note “does not fully address all the issues we had with the original article” but that it was “grateful” that the Mail had dealt with its objections. [Daily Mail, 1/9/13, updated 3/8/13] [Met Office News Blog, 1/10/13] [Met Office, 3/8/13]


Why Does U.S. Media Trust A Tabloid On Science?


Daily Mail Consistently Publishes Sensationalist, Contradicting “Science” Stories. The Daily Mail has consistently misled on scientific developments, even publishing articles that blatantly contradict each other. For example, two Mail Online articles made different claims about whether or not fracking can cause earthquakes:


Mail Headline - Fracking


[The Daily Mail, 4/9/13, image edited to remove ads]


Mail Headline - Fracking


[The Daily Mail, 7/2/13, image edited to remove ads]


The newspaper also appears to encounter a difficult time accurately reporting on the science behind relatively fluffier subjects, including whether or not wearing high-heeled shoes produces negative health outcomes or if mobile phone usage does or does not contribute to increased incidence trends of brain cancer: 


Mail Headline - High Heels


[The Daily Mail, accessed 12/10/13, image edited to remove ads


Mail Headline - High Heels


[The Daily Mail, 7/30/13, image edited to remove ads]


Mail Headline - Mobile


[The Daily Mail, 10/21/13, image edited to remove ads


Mail Headline - Mobile


[The Daily Mail, 10/19/13, image edited to remove ads]


The Daily Mail has also mislead on the science of cancer research to grab traffic. As Buzzfeed pointed out in an August 1 article, the Daily Mail has claimed that the sun, polio, Jasper the rescue dog, and many other things could be the “cure for cancer.”


Mail Headline - Cancer


[Buzzfeed, 8/1/13]


Study: British Tabloids Contribute To Climate Misinformation In Public. Research from Oxford University’s Environmental Change Institute studied the effect of British tabloids such as the Daily Mail on how citizens perceive climate change. They found that misinformation in these tabloids “can contribute to skewed views among these papers’ many readers.” From Oxford University’s press release:


Based on an analysis of nearly 1,000 tabloid articles from the Daily Mail, the Sun, the Express and the Mirror, the researchers found that many readers were being misinformed. The researchers analysed the tone, the context, the terminology, the labelling of those quoted and the relationships between messages.


The researchers found that about a quarter of coverage in the four UK tabloids from 2000 through 2006 misrepresented wide scientific agreement that man-made GHG emissions have ‘very likely’ had a role to play in global warming.


Dr Max Boykoff, James Martin Research Fellow at the Environmental Change Institute, said: ‘These newspapers have very high circulation and influence in the UK. We hope these findings help tabloid reporters and editors reflect further on the accuracy of their climate change reporting.


‘To the extent that reporting and commentary have misrepresented scientific consensus on the issue of human contributions to climate change, there is a problem.’


[...]


Dr Boykoff continued: ‘Misreporting on human contributions to climate change can contribute to skewed views among these papers’ many readers. We’re all involved in the fight against climate change and it’s in all of our interest to widen, rather than restrict, the spectrum of possibility for appropriate policy action.’ [Oxford University, 4/28/08, emphasis added]




Media Matters for America



Denise Robbins & Shauna Theel: Climate Change Misinformer Of The Year: The Daily Mail

Friday, December 13, 2013

Marissa Mayer apologizes for lengthy Yahoo Mail outage


Two days ago, Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer tweeted that its ongoing problems with Yahoo Mail had finally been fixed. But she spoke too soon: email problems continued, drawing mounting criticism for the company’s inability to restore the service. The outage comes at a time when the company is still struggling to persuade its own employees to use Yahoo Mail instead of Outlook for corporate email. Today, Mayer took to Tumblr to try to explain what had happened. “This has been a very frustrating week for our users and we are very sorry,” she wrote.


“This has been a very frustrating week for our users.”


According to Mayer, the outage was “much more complex than it seemed at first.” The problem began Monday night, when Yahoo Mail suffered a hardware outage in one of its storage systems. But different users reported different problems, making the outage more difficult to resolve. Some people were locked out of their accounts; others failed to receive messages. (Mayer says they were held in a queue.) The outage affected about 1 percent of Yahoo Mail users, she said.


Mayer said that Yahoo has restored Mail access “to almost everyone” and delivered their messages to them. Affected users will be notified by Yahoo directly on the status of their account, she said. “Above all else, we’re going to be working hard on improvements to prevent issues like this in the future,” Mayer said. “While our overall uptime is well above 99.9%, even accounting for this incident, we really let you down this week.” Future updates will be posted to Yahoo Mail’s status page.




The Verge – All Posts



Marissa Mayer apologizes for lengthy Yahoo Mail outage

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Go Ahead And Mail Your Boring Holiday Cards

Go Ahead And Mail Your Boring Holiday Cards
http://media.npr.org/assets/img/2013/12/08/simonsantasuperman-81f88cf20c73f49a2ff81bf7db2140d06363d499-s6-c30.jpg





After he and his son Simon encountered both Santa Claus and Superman in an ice cream parlor, NPR’s Alan Greenblatt sent out this holiday photo in 2010.



Courtesy Alan Greenblatt


It’s always chic to make fun of holiday letters. People can’t win, whether they earnestly recount their fellowship missions to poor countries (self-important), brag about European vacations (must be nice) or simply bore with accounts of school plays or travails in their gardens.


The habit of knocking holiday letters is now not just snark shared between friends, but has become an annual journalistic tradition.


Holiday letters can be “insufferable” and “deadly boring,” Laura Vanderkam complains in Fast Company. “There’s often a subtext of social competition,” according to Peggy Drexler in The Wall Street Journal. And those are in articles that defend the tradition.


“Dear friends and relatives, it’s not you — it’s your holiday cards. They’re ridiculous!” Eric Hoover tweeted Friday, promoting his Washington Post article on the subject.


In previous years, some have argued social media have made the whole idea of sending out holiday cards not just superfluous but annoyingly redundant.


“There’s little point to writing a Christmas update now,” Nina Burleigh wrote last year for Time. “The urge to share has already been well sated.”


The holiday card has indeed, like so much else, been forever altered and perhaps endangered by the Internet. What I don’t understand is the urge to dance on its grave.


Perfectly Posed


Hoover’s complaint is that too many photo cards look like they’ve been torn from some mythic catalog of My Great and Clever Self and are wholly impersonal. He’s put off not just by the preening he sees in the perfectly arranged family photographs, but the fact that he’s receiving pre-printed messages that have nothing to do with him.


“Even the font seems smug,” Hoover writes.


Oh, smug font. How upsetting.


There’s no question that people have mixed motives when they send out their cards. No doubt they want to put the best face on their own lives, offering an annual report marked more by pride, perhaps, than honesty.


Does this surprise anyone? Would it somehow be more festive to recount the slings and arrows, the illnesses and petty failures that may have marked or even dominated the year just ending? In sending out a mass mailing, even to family and friends, there’s a thin line between heartfelt and TMI.


It’s Just A Joke


I started sending out holiday cards maybe about 25 years ago. My photos have always been jokes, admittedly inspired at first by the idea of mocking the type of wholesome photo — often showing the family, with the dog, gathered by the tree — that was the style at the time.


Like Halloween costumers, I usually make fun of some moment in the news. Some of the images have been in poor enough taste that I ended up breaking down and including a letter as well, to soften the tone.


In recent years, I’ve come to enjoy writing and sending letters on their own merit. It’s a way of lending greater coherence to my own life’s story — and connecting with people I’m often otherwise barely in touch with — that maybe works better than a 10-second tweet or series of status updates.


Some people, in some years, like the letter a lot better than the gag photo.


Thinking Of You


But what’s the harm if they don’t? It’s a friendly gesture, not a writing contest. And, as Drexler points out in her Wall Street Journal article, it’s not as if many people are in any great danger of having friends send them more than one letter per year.


Whether driven by the desire to boast or amuse or simply good, old-fashioned guilt, holiday cards and letters are almost certainly well-intentioned. Like any gift, they are a sign that a person thought of you when you were absent, demonstrating that you have been in her thoughts, if only for a moment, and thus have some meaning in her life.


That’s true even if the attempt was lame. If you wouldn’t send back a letter stamped “Return to Sender: Insufficiently Moving,” why would you complain about it in print?


Good will to men, you know?




News




Read more about Go Ahead And Mail Your Boring Holiday Cards and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

NSA, Stripper poles, and the Chinese government opens your mail

NSA, Stripper poles, and the Chinese government opens your mail
http://img.youtube.com/vi/xji-ZC_-9t0/0.jpg


Ingabobjoe and I chatting about the Chinese government and the NSA over a soothing compilations of gory destruction.




Read more about NSA, Stripper poles, and the Chinese government opens your mail and other interesting subjects concerning Surveillance State at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, October 12, 2013

A right royal rip-off - What the Royal Mail privatisation tells us about modern Britain



Neil Clark is a journalist, writer and broadcaster. His award winning blog can be found at www.neilclark66.blogspot.com. Follow him on Twitter




Published time: October 12, 2013 14:52

Postal workers travel aboard an open top bus as they campaign against the privatisation of the Royal Mail, London (Reuters / Suzanne Plunkett)


It’s the wilful destruction of another much-loved British institution. The privatisation of the Royal Mail, the British postal service, brings to an end nearly five hundred years of history- stretching back the days of King Henry VIII. 


By privatising the Royal Mail, our coalition government has shown that it does not care a jot for our national heritage, or the devastating impact the sell-off will have on remote rural communities, or how the elderly and the poor will be disproportionately affected. They have shown us that all they care about is rewarding their wealthy backers in the City of London and keeping in with the giants of global capitalism.


Even Mrs Thatcher, the Prime Minister who started the privatisation process in Britain in 1979 thought that selling the Royal Mail was a step too far. However the current UK government with its fanatical commitment to neo-liberalism is determined to take us to dark, scary places that even the Iron Lady shied away from.


The British public, who know only too well from first-hand experience that privatisation invariably means higher prices and worse services, was overwhelmingly opposed to the sale. An opinion poll in July revealed that 67% were against the privatisation, with 36% ‘strongly’ opposed. Just 4% were ’strongly’ in favour. 96% of Royal Mail employees were against the sale too. Yet despite this overwhelming public opposition, the government arrogantly pushed ahead with its plans, showing once again the contempt with which it regards the views of the majority. Ludicrously the sell-off has been hailed by Prime Minister David Cameron as ‘a piece of popular capitalism’. In fact, it’s a piece of highly unpopular capitalism, in which the public have lost out in a massive way. 


Once again, an asset that we- the British people- owned has been flogged off way below its real value. The fact that shares leapt by as much as 38% on the first day of conditional trading, shows us how much the government undervalued the company. 


Postal workers travel aboard an open top bus as they campaign against the privatisation of the Royal Mail, London (Reuters / Suzanne Plunkett)


For instance, the Royal Mail’s real estate was valued at just £787m-a laughable figure considering that it owns some prime sites in our major cities, including a depot in London estimated to be worth £1bn. The Royal Mail plans to reduce its number of sites from 45 to 37 by 2016, with the profits from property sales going to the new private owners. Meanwhile, as the private investors gorge on the profits, we – the taxpayers – have been left holding Royal Mail pension fund liabilities of around £37.5bn – a clear case of nationalising the losses and privatising the gains.  


The pledge by the Business Secretary Vince Cable that  only ‘responsible, long-term institutional investors’ would be permitted to buy Royal Mail shares is at variance with the news that hedge funds, the vilest manifestation of modern vulture capitalism, have been allowed to invest. It’s been reported that Lansdowne Partners, one of the world’s biggest hedge funds, had taken ‘a massive stake’ in Royal Mail.  Lansdowne are not the only giant of global capitalism to benefit, for the lead adviser to the government on the sale was none other than the ’great vampire squid’ itself, Goldman Sachs.  Overall, the government paid £21.7m in fees to ‘advisers’ for advice on selling a company which the owners – the British public – didn’t want sold.


 Whichever way you look at it the sell-off represents a right royal rip-off for the British taxpayer. There’ll be further costs down the line too. On Wednesday, the Royal Mail admitted that more postal workers will lose their jobs following the sell-off. And although the universal service obligation remains, it’s likely that the privatised Royal Mail, whose sole aim will be profit maximisation, will lobby hard for it to be dropped. What are the odds that in a few years time, the taxpayer will be subsiding a privatised Royal Mail to enable it to continue delivering the mail to remote rural areas six days a week? Let’s not forget that Britain’s privatised rail companies have received around four times in taxpayer subsidy than the publicly-owned British Rail did. It’s a neo-liberal myth that privatisation saves the taxpayer money – on the contrary; it invariably costs us far more than keeping the service ‘in house’.


 If Britain was a genuine democracy- as it used to be in the period 1945-79, before the neo-liberals and neo-cons took over, the issue of Royal Mail privatisation would not even have been on the agenda.


 But the very fact it was sold – with such a blatant disregard for public opinion – tells us everything we need to know about the country we have become. Our government doesn’t act in our interests, in the interests of the majority, but in the interests of powerful financial and business elites. It’s these elites who wanted the Royal Mail sold, not the British people. 


The sell-off of this much-loved historic institution is proof that even after the successful democratic people’s uprising which stopped our government taking us into a war against Syria – a war which no one outside elite circles wanted – there is still an awful lot of work to do.


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.




RT – Op-Edge



A right royal rip-off - What the Royal Mail privatisation tells us about modern Britain

Friday, October 11, 2013

FTSE CLOSE: Royal Mail shares soar at debut


By This Is Money Reporters


|


17.15 (close): The FTSE 100 index at the close was up 56.70 at 6487.19.


15.20: The Dow Jones has opened up 50 points at 15,176 while traders wait for US politicians to settle their differences over the debt ceiling.


In London, the FTSE 100 was 54.5 points higher at 6,485. Royal Mail shares are trading at 437.9p, up from a launch price of 330p.


Louise Cooper of financial consultancy CooperCity said: ‘It looks like there may be a short term deal to raise the debt ceiling this weekend avoiding financial catastrophe for the time being. 



US crisis: President Obama and Republican leaders in Congress could be edging towards a deal on raising the debt ceiling to prevent a default


US crisis: President Obama and Republican leaders in Congress could be edging towards a deal on raising the debt ceiling to prevent a default


US crisis: President Obama and Republican leaders in Congress could be edging towards a deal on raising the debt ceiling to prevent a default



‘A bigger deal is supposedly being negotiated. However this row has been on-going for over two years and so I am sceptical of any grand bargain being done.


‘The longer and more bitter the dispute becomes the more difficult it is for either side to eventually back down. The two sides are deeply entrenched in their positions. Thus the rows over the debt ceiling and government spending, I believe, are likely to continue, possibly for years. 


‘That continued uncertainty and potential for automatic spending cuts is likely to have a dampening effect on the US and therefore the global economy. ‘


14.20:


The FTSE 100 is trading 39 points higher at 6,469.5 as investors remain on alert for news from the US about a deal to stave off a debt default.


Wall Street futures are flat following yesterday’s strong session after it emerged that Republicans could cave in to Democrats and pass a short-term increase in the debt ceiling without conditions such as defunding Obamacare.


President Barack Obama’s law to extend healthcare to more Americans has been a major sticking point in the Washington battle over the budget and debt ceiling, as Republicans try to overturn the measure and Democrats accuse them of holding the government to ransom.


The latest developments in the US, which could see the two sides get six more weeks to come to a longer-term agreement, was welcomed by markets after several days of turbulence.


Meanwhile, Royal Mail has gained 33 per cent to 439.9p from its debut price on a bumper first day for the stock and its new investors.


The Government said that 95 per cent of all applicants for the heavily-oversubscribed offer had picked up stock but the price surge reignited claims that ministers had sold off public assets too cheaply.


The risers board was topped by leisure group Whitbread as speculation continued over the potential for a break-up of the Costa coffee and Premier Inn hotels chain. Shares rose sharply yesterday and were up another 3 per cent or 95.5p to 3209.5p today.


Standard Life, which climbed 9.1p to 355.5p, while Lloyds Banking Group added 1p to 75.9p. In a strong session for financial stocks, Barclays rose 3.8p to 278.3p, HSBC lifted 10.8p to 689.1p and Aberdeen Asset Management added 7.7p to 391.1p.


Elsewhere, shares in defence group Chemring slid by more than 20 per cent as it followed the lead of BAE Systems yesterday in highlighting the impact of the US government shutdown on its business.


It warned that this and other factors would cause operating profits to be £8million lower than hoped for in the current financial year, leaving shares 62.5p down at 221.9p.


Stephen Lewis, chief economist at Monument Securities, said regarding a possible US deal: ‘Receding concerns over a meltdown in the money markets spurred confidence in equities, where investors had, in any case, been predisposed to respond to good news regarding the fiscal stand-off, seeing that the consensus all along had been that a 12th-hour settlement would be reached.


‘The financial markets, naturally, have tended to view the whole shutdown/debt ceiling saga as a crisis in US fiscal management, if not more broadly in US government.


‘This is probably not how it looks to the politicians involved in the manoeuvres that alternately aggravate and soothe market opinion. For them, the prize is what it has always been, namely, partisan advantage. 


‘Some Republican congressmen, doubtless, feel a rooted aversion to Obamacare but they would probably not have attached a defunding clause to the “continuing resolution”, had they not been aware of opinion polls showing the Affordable Care Act to be unpopular with the American public. They sought to win credit with that public by defeating, or delaying, the Obamacare provisions. 


‘The strategy they chose to establish this advantage was ill-conceived, as Republican Party leaders now seem to recognise. It would always have been difficult to shift the blame for a government shutdown, in the eyes of the public, on to President Obama and the Democrats. It became near-impossible after Senator [Ted] Cruz’s obviously destructive filibuster had achieved global notoriety. The damage to the Republicans is reflected in opinion polls showing the lowest degree of public satisfaction with them in the past 20 years.’


He added: ‘All concerned are talking as though any continuing resolution or lifting of the debt ceiling would truly be temporary; there is no presumption it would be the prelude to a permanent settlement.’


11.50:


The Royal Mail float has got off to a strong start, with the shares still up a thumping 33 per cent at 438.9p in late morning trading.


The debut appears to have vindicated City players who claimed the company was undervalued, only to be slapped down by Vince Cable just before the launch – but commentators warn that IPOs tend to be volatile. Read more here.


The FTSE 100 has rallied 44.3 points to 6,474.8 amid optimism that warring US politicians might finally hash out a deal to avert the threat of a debt default.


‘Risk appetite is finally returning to the financial markets, with investors more optimistic over a deal on the debt ceiling now that both sides are finally showing a willingness to seriously negotiate,’ said Craig Erlam of Alpari.


‘While most people have believed all along that lawmakers from both sides would finally start taking these negotiations seriously, I think what we saw in the US and Asia overnight is a collective sigh of relief.


‘Relief that we may not have to wait for an eleventh hour deal on this one, which would create a certain amount of chaos in financial markets, or even worse that the deadline [on October 17] will be hit and no deal will have been struck. The only question now is, how far will they kick the can down the road this time?


‘Unfortunately, it doesn’t look like they’re going to kick it very far. In fact, the House Republicans have proposed an increase in the debt ceiling that would give the US six weeks until its back in exactly the same situation again.


‘It would appear that US lawmakers are not a huge fan of national holidays. Last year they effectively cancelled Christmas in order to avoid going over the fiscal cliff, now it looks as though Thanksgiving will be the next casualty as the extension would push the deadline back to the end of November.’


Monex Capital said: ‘The punch-line may be that “it’s good to talk” and markets are applauding the fact that the two sides in Washington seem to be showing at least a veneer of wanting to make some progress in averting an all-out debt crisis.


‘Yesterday’s big gains on Wall Street translated into a solid end to the week for Asian markets, although it’s interesting to note the dollar giving back some of its recent gains, too.


‘That said, with the fact the first GOP [Republican] offer has been rejected by Obama, the risk of uncertainty is still lingering so there’s going to be plenty of investors out there who simply don’t want to be sitting on too much risk heading into the weekend break.’


Jim Reid of Deutsche Bank said: ‘Following talks with House Republicans at the White House late yesterday, President Obama stopped short of accepting the Republican proposal for a short six-week extension to the debt limit in exchange for wide-ranging negotiations on spending.


‘Importantly though, Obama did not outright reject the Republican plan, and the talks between House Republicans and White House remain constructive according to various accounts. As House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan put it, Obama “didn’t say yes, he didn’t say no”.


‘The President told Republicans during the meeting that he wants any proposal to also include an agreement to reopen government.


‘The exact parameters of the Republican proposal are not clear, but it does appear that negotiations are centred on how far to extend the debt limit and how much funding they would provide the government when it opens, according to Republicans. Significantly, defunding Obamacare [Obama"s signature health law] does not appear to be a condition of this short-term agreement.


‘Meanwhile, the latest opinion  polls indicate that Republicans appear to be getting more of the blame for the standoff. An NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released on Thursday found approval of the Republican Party at 24 per cent, which is a record low. Democrats won the approval of 39 per cent of the U.S. public.


‘In addition to that, the two highest-profile leaders of the GOP’s “Defund Obamacare” effort, Ted Cruz and Mike Lee, have also suffered a sharp fall in popularity according to the latest Gallup poll.’


Washington stand-off: Republican Speaker John Boehner leaves his office on Capitol Hill for talks at the White House, as a slew of polls say Americans are blaming his party for the crisis

Washington stand-off: Republican Speaker John Boehner leaves his office on Capitol Hill for talks at the White House, as a slew of polls say Americans are blaming his party for the crisis



9.30:


Royal Mail shares have jumped 35 per cent to 444.63p in early trading, creating an immediate windfall for ordinary investors who bought £750-worth of stock, Read more here.


The Government said that 95 per cent of all applicants for the heavily-oversubscribed offer had picked up stock but the price surge reignited claims that ministers had sold off public assets too cheaply.


The FTSE 100 was 24.9 higher at 6,455.4 as US politicians appeared to be nearing a deal on raising the debt ceiling to stave off a potentially disastrous default.


However the situation is fluid and there has been no retreat on the budget stand-off that has closed large parts of the US government.


Risers in London included insurer Standard Life, which climbed 6.6p to 353.1p, while Lloyds Banking Group added 0.6p to 75.5p after it sold its Australian operations to Westpac in a deal worth £900million.


Joe Rundle, head of trading at ETX Capital, said the Royal Mail stock market debut was ‘dazzling’.


‘The jump in the shares above 400p will certainly see the UK government being criticised for selling the company too cheaply, ripping off UK taxpayers but it must be noted that institutional allocations have been scaled back this time, allowing allocation to retail clients.’


He added: ‘Looking to the immediate future for Royal Mail, the threat of industrial action still looms, [and] structural problems such as a lack of adequate capital and unclear growth strategy are likely to weigh on the stock price.


‘Management and MPs will have to continue talking up Royal Mail in the run up to the UK elections next year, with the market now looking out for details on how this company will adapt, expand and deliver rewards to its investors.’


8.40:


The FTSE 100 has opened up 19.7 points at 6,450.2, bolstered by the prospect of US politicians reaching a deal on the country’s debt ceiling.


Investors are also watching the debut of Royal Mail group following a controversial but heavily subscribed floatation  – the shares shot up from a starting price of 330p to 446.9p at the open.


In Washington, President Barack Obama and Republican leaders appeared ready to end the deadlock and raise the US debt ceiling after a meeting at the White House. Talks continued into the night and one senior Republican said an agreement could come today, though hurdles remain.



Global equities have lost ground this month after the US government partially shut down due to a stalemate over the country’s budget.


This has led to concerns that no deal will be reached to raise the $ 16.7trillion borrowing limit, which Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said the government will hit no later than October 17.


Optimism over a breakthrough in the US impasse helped lift the Footsie 92.58 points or 1.5 per cent to 6,430.49 yesterday, its biggest one-day percentage gain since July. The index had fallen to its lowest level since July 4 on Wednesday.


Darren Courtney-Cook, head of trading at Central Markets Investment Management, said that even if all the US politicians did was to set a short-term debt-limit extension, the avoidance of a default would be enough to soothe investors’ nerves.


‘Even if they just kick the can down the road again, the fact that there won’t be a default is why the markets would take it so positively. There may be some volatility going up to the wire, but most people expect a year-end rally,’ he said.


Michael Hewson of CMC Markets said of the US developments: ‘The fact that the two sides are talking to each other is progress and as well known jaw-jaw is better than war-war.


‘While averting an imminent default, any agreement would not re-open the government, or repair the damage being done to the US economy, caused by the current shutdown, which makes yesterday’s market rally somewhat irrational, even if it is understandable in the context of the fact that politicians are actually starting to wake up the consequences of their actions, and inching back from the abyss of a potential default.


‘A look at the opinion polls may have also been rather sobering for the Republicans with a majority of Americans blaming them for the log jam, which may explain the slight softening of their positions.


‘As we head into day 11 and the weekend, one thing is certain, there is bound to be a lot more twists and turns in this saga over the next few days.


‘In any case an agreement to extend the deadline also only serves to shift the debate nearer to the Thanksgiving break, which would obviously mean potentially another six weeks of this political nonsense.’


Stocks to watch today include:


ROYAL MAIL: Britain sold a majority stake in Royal Mail at 330 pence a share following massive investor interest that values the postal service company, known worldwide for its iconic red postboxes, at £3.3billion.


LLOYDS BANKING GROUP : The bank has sold its Australian operations to Westpac.


WHITBREAD: Shares in the leisure company rose, helped by revived speculation it might soon decide to hive off its Costa Coffee business, according to the Daily Mail market report.


CHEMRING: The military equipment maker warned that it would take an £8million hit to 2013 operating profit from continuing production and quality problems, and that it saw 2014 performance behind this year’s.


ASTRAZENECA: The drugmaker has signed a deal to co-promote Johnson & Johnson’s novel prostate cancer medicine in Japan, giving the company a new drug revenue stream and bolstering its Japanese presence.









Money | Mail Online



FTSE CLOSE: Royal Mail shares soar at debut