Showing posts with label Ones. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ones. Show all posts

Monday, November 18, 2013

Foreigners avoid short U.S. assets in Sept, buy longer ones

Foreigners avoid short U.S. assets in Sept, buy longer ones
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/3364e__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif





NEW YORK Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:40am EST



NEW YORK (Reuters) – Foreigners fled from short-term U.S. assets in September as a budget battle in Washington raised fears the government could default on some obligations, though demand for longer-term securities rose, U.S. Treasury data showed on Monday.


The budget standoff that was building in September forced a partial government shutdown that lasted for the first 16 days of October. That dented the safe-haven status of U.S. Treasury bills and pushed yields up sharply on bills maturing toward the end of that month.


Including short-dated assets such as bills, foreigners sold $ 106.8 billion in September, the biggest decline since February, 2009. August’s outflow was also revised higher to $ 13.8 billion from an initially reported $ 2.9 billion.


Congress raised the debt ceiling a day before the Treasury said it would have run out of money to pay some obligations.


“You probably had a lot of people avoiding the short end of the U.S. yield curve at that point, which likely drove the big drop there,” said Gennadiy Goldberg, U.S. strategist at TD Securities in New York.


But investors increased holdings of long-term securities in September by $ 25.5 billion as buying of Treasury notes and bonds as well as stocks and agency debt rose. That came after long-dated holdings fell by a revised $ 9.8 billion in August.


Goldberg credited the turnaround to the Fed’s surprise decision not to start slowing its bond purchases in September, leaving most market participants expecting the central bank will not start winding down quantitative easing until early 2014.


“The non-taper decision probably led to the sizable reversal on long-term assets,” he said. “We saw strong buying in pretty much everything across the board in the U.S.”


Longer-dated Treasury holdings rose by $ 27.8 billion, more than reversing August’s $ 10.8 billion decline. China, the largest U.S. foreign creditor, saw its holdings rise by $ 25.7 billion to $ 1.294 trillion, a four-month high.


Overall, though, it was private foreign investors who bought Treasuries. So-called “official” investors, which includes central banks, were net sellers in September, according to the Treasury data.


Foreign demand for debt backed by the biggest U.S. federal housing agencies rose by $ 14.7 billion during September, just below August’s $ 16.8 billion inflow.


Overseas holdings of U.S. equities also rose by $ 12.5 billion, nearly reversing August’s $ 16.9 billion decline.


(Reporting by Steven C. Johnson; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)






Reuters: Economic News




Read more about Foreigners avoid short U.S. assets in Sept, buy longer ones and other interesting subjects concerning Economy at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Monday, October 28, 2013

Reprogrammed stem cells may mirror embryonic ones after all


BOSTON — Some concerns about whether reprogrammed stem cells are acceptable stand-ins for embryonic stem cells in biomedical research may be laid to rest by a new study.


Previously, scientists have found that gene activity, such as how genes turn on and off, differs between induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPS cells, and embryonic stem cells, the flexible cells that iPS cells are designed to mimic.


Those problems probably arise from the fact that iPS and embryonic stem cells come from donors with different genetic makeups, Natsuhiko Kumasaka of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Cambridge, England, said October 24 at the annual meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics.


Kumasaka and his colleagues reprogrammed cells from four people. All cells reprogrammed from a single donor had similar gene activity, but the activity differed slightly from that of cells made from other donors, the researchers found. The difference in gene activity between donors is similar to the discrepancies previously noted between embryonic stem cells and iPS cells. 




Latest Headlines | Science News



Reprogrammed stem cells may mirror embryonic ones after all

Sunday, June 2, 2013

UN Expert Worries About Killer Robots, Ignores The Ones That Already Exist


Autonomous war robots are coming. Panicking about them will only make things worse.



Fictional F/A-37

Fictional F/A-37 A fictional autonomous robot fighter plane from the 2005 movie “Stealth.” Wikimedia Commons



Yesterday, a United Nations expert called for a halt and moratorium on developing “lethal autonomous robotics,” or, in layman’s terms, “killer robots.”


His argument: once killer robots take part in war, there will be no going back. Christof Heyns, the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, told the Human Rights Council that now is the time to regulate and stop killer robots, arguing that “decisions over life and death in armed conflict may require compassion and intuition.” He also urged the council to form a panel that would study whether international laws in place today adequately address the use of killer robots.


Thing is, killer robots already exist. And they’re about the least compassionate machines we could imagine.


Actual killer robots

Actual Killer Robots: a pile of landmines in Cambodia.  Neil Rickards, via Wikimedia Commons



I’m talking about land mines, those notorious explosives that explode when walked over. Land mines are programmed to kill when certain conditions are met. That is the same principle guiding a killer robot.


But there are some key differences: A killer robot might make a decision based on algorithms and inputs, internal coding and pre-programmed combat behaviors. It might be programmed to understand the laws of war, and it might use surveillance technologies to make distinctions between unarmed civilians and armed combatants. The same principles that power facial recognition software could apply to robots targeting their weapons at other weapons, so they fire to disable guns and not to kill people.


Land mines, on the other hand, fail to distinguish between civilians and soldiers, between soldiers of different nations, and between animals or large children or small soldiers. Land-mine triggers cannot be easily shut off and are designed for durability not intelligence. At their worst, killer robots could be as deadly and as indiscriminate as landmines. Chances are, though, they will be much more sophisticated.


The task before lawmakers is not to ban a technology out of fear but to adapt the law to the technology once it exists. Making legislative decisions about new technology is tricky business. In the United States, electronic communication is governed by a law passed well before email was a regular fixture of life. Provisions that made sense to congressmen in 1986 trying to imagine email led to great weaknesses in privacy and personal security, all because the technology wasn’t understood when the law was written. The stakes are much lower in governing electronic communications than in authorizing robots to kill.


Killer robots are coming. Efforts to halt their introduction or ban their development are not only likely to fail, but they’ll drown out legitimate concerns about the safest way to implement the technology with Luddite fear-mongering.




Popular Science – New Technology, Science News, The Future Now



UN Expert Worries About Killer Robots, Ignores The Ones That Already Exist