Showing posts with label TAPE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TAPE. Show all posts

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Sticky Tape Lab

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Sticky Tape Lab

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Alyssa Milano ‘Sex Tape’ Promotes Attack on Syria


PR stunt regurgitates Obama’s “red line” propaganda


Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
September 5, 2013


Actress Alyssa Milano has created a fake ‘sex tape’ which serves to propagandize for an attack on Syria.


The PR stunt, designed to “inform” people about the situation in Syria, merely regurgitates the official narrative about Assad being behind last month’s chemical weapons attack which violated Barack Obama’s “red line”.


It makes no mention of the other side of the debate, including the UN’s acknowledgment that the FSA rebels used chemical weapons back in March or last week’s report by Associated Press correspondent Dale Gavlak which contained interviews with rebels who admitted being responsible for the chemical weapons incident in Ghouta.


While the video, which originally featured on FunnyorDie.com, will by no means achieve the same viral success as Kony 2012, it is certainly directed at a similar audience judging by its total lack of nuance or intellectual sophistication.


Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet


*********************


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.


This article was posted: Thursday, September 5, 2013 at 5:49 am









Prison Planet.com



Alyssa Milano ‘Sex Tape’ Promotes Attack on Syria

Saturday, August 31, 2013

GAO releases tale of the tape on patent litigation

The Government Accountability Office is shown. | AP Photo

Cases from 2007 to 2011 show patent lawsuits increased by nearly 130 percent. | AP Photo





The world wants to blame so-called “patent trolls” for the lawsuits that have tied the intellectual property system into knots — but operating companies that make actual products are the ones running to the courthouse, government investigators have found.


“These data also show that companies that make products brought most of the lawsuits and that non-practicing entities brought about a fifth of all lawsuits,” the Government Accountability Office said in a report released Thursday.







That doesn’t mean that patent trolls — or patent monetization entities, as the GAO calls them — aren’t part of the problem, said Frank Rusco, GAO natural resources and environment-energy and science director.


“Although the companies filed the most suits, the PMEs tended to focus on software patents,” he explained to POLITICO. “That’s the space in which the PMEs operate.”


But Rusco said that focusing on patent trolls misses the bigger point.


“We think the focus on patent monetization entities is obscuring the bigger point, which is the quality of the patents themselves,” he explained.


The detailed analysis of 500 lawsuits from 2007 to 2011 shows that the number of overall defendants in patent infringement lawsuits increased by nearly 130 percent. The GAO found that there were 3,270 patent infringement lawsuits filed in 2011. That number was 2,491 in 2010 and 2,166 in 2000. Software-related patents accounted for about 89 percent of that increase, according to the GAO.


The report recommends that the Patent and Trademark Office consider examining trends in infringement litigation and consider linking that information to internal examinations as a way to improve patent quality and analysis. The PTO agreed with the GAO’s assessment.


“The USPTO currently uses information relating to cases involved in patent litigation, and agrees that it would be appropriate to consider making better use of such information by examining trends in patent infringement litigation,” the PTO wrote in its comments. “The USPTO also agrees that as part of its ongoing effort to improve the quality of issued patents and the patent examination process, it would be appropriate to consider linking trends in patent litigation to internal data on patent examination.”


Rusco noted that the nature of suits filed by patent trolls is different. Companies tend to file a single infringement lawsuit on one product, but patent-assertion entities sue a bunch of people at one time.


“They sue more people for a single patent,” he said. “They cast a wider net.”


Many suggest the increase in patent infringement lawsuits was caused by a rush to file suits before implementation of the America Invents Act, which made some significant changes to the law.


A coalition of industry and public interest groups seized on some the report’s findings and contended that an emphasis on the total number of lawsuits and who filed them misses the point.


Internet Association President Michael Beckerman said patent troll lawsuits are particularly pernicious because they hit people, tech start-ups and businesses outside the technology sector.


“We’re focused on the PAEs because of the increasing number of the suits, it’s a larger number of the defendants, but also it’s who the victims are, ” he explained. “It’s the PAEs that are going after the grocers, that are going after various retail entities. They’re going after restaurants and charities, in some of the most egregious cases, that are hurting non-tech, non-Internet companies across the country and are in fact hurting consumers.”


Russ Merbeth, chief policy counsel for Intellectual Ventures, said the report confirms that the company’s contention that patent-assertion entities aren’t the problem. The company holds about 70,000 patents.


“What it tells you that at this point in time there is a whole lot more litigation between operating companies than there is being brought by patent monetization entities,” Merbeth said. “The number of lawsuits relative to the number of patents out there has remained flat over time. … There’s just not the level of increase in patent litigation that critics of patent assertion entities would have you believe.”


While the GAO is critical of software patent quality, Merbeth contends that policy makers need to be careful that they don’t throw out the patent baby with the bathwater.


“It’s a bad idea to tar and feather all software patents as poorly defined or overly broad,” he said. “There may be a number of software patents out there that are lousy, low quality, and maybe those ended up in the hands of those who are doing unsavory things with them … but I don’t think the report should lead anyone to conclude that all software patents are bad or patenting software is a bad idea.”




POLITICO – Congress



GAO releases tale of the tape on patent litigation

GAO releases tale of the tape on patent litigation

The Government Accountability Office is shown. | AP Photo

Cases from 2007 to 2011 show patent lawsuits increased by nearly 130 percent. | AP Photo





The world wants to blame so-called “patent trolls” for the lawsuits that have tied the intellectual property system into knots — but operating companies that make actual products are the ones running to the courthouse, government investigators have found.


“These data also show that companies that make products brought most of the lawsuits and that non-practicing entities brought about a fifth of all lawsuits,” the Government Accountability Office said in a report released Thursday.







That doesn’t mean that patent trolls — or patent monetization entities, as the GAO calls them — aren’t part of the problem, said Frank Rusco, GAO natural resources and environment-energy and science director.


“Although the companies filed the most suits, the PMEs tended to focus on software patents,” he explained to POLITICO. “That’s the space in which the PMEs operate.”


But Rusco said that focusing on patent trolls misses the bigger point.


“We think the focus on patent monetization entities is obscuring the bigger point, which is the quality of the patents themselves,” he explained.


The detailed analysis of 500 lawsuits from 2007 to 2011 shows that the number of overall defendants in patent infringement lawsuits increased by nearly 130 percent. The GAO found that there were 3,270 patent infringement lawsuits filed in 2011. That number was 2,491 in 2010 and 2,166 in 2000. Software-related patents accounted for about 89 percent of that increase, according to the GAO.


The report recommends that the Patent and Trademark Office consider examining trends in infringement litigation and consider linking that information to internal examinations as a way to improve patent quality and analysis. The PTO agreed with the GAO’s assessment.


“The USPTO currently uses information relating to cases involved in patent litigation, and agrees that it would be appropriate to consider making better use of such information by examining trends in patent infringement litigation,” the PTO wrote in its comments. “The USPTO also agrees that as part of its ongoing effort to improve the quality of issued patents and the patent examination process, it would be appropriate to consider linking trends in patent litigation to internal data on patent examination.”


Rusco noted that the nature of suits filed by patent trolls is different. Companies tend to file a single infringement lawsuit on one product, but patent-assertion entities sue a bunch of people at one time.


“They sue more people for a single patent,” he said. “They cast a wider net.”


Many suggest the increase in patent infringement lawsuits was caused by a rush to file suits before implementation of the America Invents Act, which made some significant changes to the law.


A coalition of industry and public interest groups seized on some the report’s findings and contended that an emphasis on the total number of lawsuits and who filed them misses the point.


Internet Association President Michael Beckerman said patent troll lawsuits are particularly pernicious because they hit people, tech start-ups and businesses outside the technology sector.


“We’re focused on the PAEs because of the increasing number of the suits, it’s a larger number of the defendants, but also it’s who the victims are, ” he explained. “It’s the PAEs that are going after the grocers, that are going after various retail entities. They’re going after restaurants and charities, in some of the most egregious cases, that are hurting non-tech, non-Internet companies across the country and are in fact hurting consumers.”


Russ Merbeth, chief policy counsel for Intellectual Ventures, said the report confirms that the company’s contention that patent-assertion entities aren’t the problem. The company holds about 70,000 patents.


“What it tells you that at this point in time there is a whole lot more litigation between operating companies than there is being brought by patent monetization entities,” Merbeth said. “The number of lawsuits relative to the number of patents out there has remained flat over time. … There’s just not the level of increase in patent litigation that critics of patent assertion entities would have you believe.”


While the GAO is critical of software patent quality, Merbeth contends that policy makers need to be careful that they don’t throw out the patent baby with the bathwater.


“It’s a bad idea to tar and feather all software patents as poorly defined or overly broad,” he said. “There may be a number of software patents out there that are lousy, low quality, and maybe those ended up in the hands of those who are doing unsavory things with them … but I don’t think the report should lead anyone to conclude that all software patents are bad or patenting software is a bad idea.”




POLITICO – Congress



GAO releases tale of the tape on patent litigation

Monday, June 24, 2013

BUSTED: Bankers Caught On Tape, Joking About Bailout, And How They’d Never Pay It Back


Julia La Roche
Business Insider
June 24, 2013


Once again, we have some more embarrassing conversations between bankers…


The Irish Independent, a Dublin-based newspaper, has uncovered tapes of an internal phone conversation from September 2008 between two executives at Anglo Irish Bank during its bailout deal and they sound pretty scandalous. The Irish Independent points out that the recordings show they misled the Central Bank.


The executives from the recording have been identified as John Bowe (head of the bank’s capital markets) and Peter Fitzgerald (director of retail banking).


However, Bowe “categorically denied” that he misled the Central Bank and Fitzgerald, who wasn’t involved in discussions with regulators, said he was unaware of any intention to mislead, the report said.



WARNING: Graphic language!


Read full article


This article was posted: Monday, June 24, 2013 at 12:40 pm


Tags: economics, financial









Infowars



BUSTED: Bankers Caught On Tape, Joking About Bailout, And How They’d Never Pay It Back

BUSTED: Bankers Caught On Tape, Joking About Bailout, And How They’d Never Pay It Back


Julia La Roche
Business Insider
June 24, 2013


Once again, we have some more embarrassing conversations between bankers…


The Irish Independent, a Dublin-based newspaper, has uncovered tapes of an internal phone conversation from September 2008 between two executives at Anglo Irish Bank during its bailout deal and they sound pretty scandalous. The Irish Independent points out that the recordings show they misled the Central Bank.


The executives from the recording have been identified as John Bowe (head of the bank’s capital markets) and Peter Fitzgerald (director of retail banking).


However, Bowe “categorically denied” that he misled the Central Bank and Fitzgerald, who wasn’t involved in discussions with regulators, said he was unaware of any intention to mislead, the report said.



WARNING: Graphic language!


Read full article


This article was posted: Monday, June 24, 2013 at 12:40 pm


Tags: economics, financial









Infowars



BUSTED: Bankers Caught On Tape, Joking About Bailout, And How They’d Never Pay It Back