Showing posts with label Trust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trust. Show all posts

Friday, April 4, 2014

This Map Shows Where Americans Trust Their State Governments

Residents in Republican-leaning states are more likely to “trust” their state governments, according to a new survey released by Gallup on Friday.


According to Gallup, in only six states do at least 70 percent of residents place either a “great deal/fair amount of trust” in their state’s government — North Dakota (77 percent), Wyoming (76), Utah (75), South Dakota (74), Nebraska (73), Texas (72), and Alaska (71). 


Illinois, by far, is the worst-ranking state in the survey — only 28 percent of its residents say they have a great deal or fair amount of trust in the state government. The next-lowest levels of trust come in Rhode Island (40 percent), Maine (40), Pennsylvania (46), Louisiana (48), California (49), and Maryland (49).


Here’s a map from Gallup shading the different levels of trustworthiness:


Gallup map


Gallup found that trust tends to be higher in less-populous states than in states with larger populations. Gallup said this helped to explain why red-leaning states earned more trust in the survey.


Illinois is by far the state in which residents least trust their government, which is helped by the fact that two of its most recent governors — Democrat Rod Blagojevich and Republican George Ryan — spent time in prison on wide-ranging corruption offenses.


Join the conversation about this story »





    








Politics



This Map Shows Where Americans Trust Their State Governments

Thursday, February 6, 2014

How Mobile Developers Can Win Customers' Trust

How Mobile Developers Can Win Customers" Trust
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif





CIO – Someone, somewhere, is about to install the mobile app that took you hundreds of hours and cost thousands to dollars to develop.
Just as he’s about to, though, he changes his mind – and you’ve just lost another potential user.


This scenario happens to developers every day. Often, it’s a matter of trust. Many apps request permissions to access private
data of many different types. Users – quite rightly – are often reluctant to grant those permissions to an app they have no
reason to trust. Do they really want the app to be able to post “on their behalf” on social networks?


“Some apps ask for access to your phone log or your photos, and you start scratching your head as to why,” says Olivier Amar,
CEO of MyPermissions, a company that has set up a free permissions certification process for developers. “Sometimes, developers really need those permissions, but they don’t have a way to explain that.”


Developers Must Meet ‘Clear Guidelines’ for MyPermissions Certification


MyPermissions’ certification program covers mobile apps as well as also websites and other applications that connect to online
services (such as Twitter or Instagram) or that allow users to authenticate themselves using services such as Facebook Connect.
That’s important because about 80 percent of the top 100 iOS apps, and almost two-thirds of the top 100 Android apps, use
Facebook Connect to let users sign in to the games or services they provide, Amar says.


To become MyPermisions Certified, developers must go through a form-filling process. This includes a review of the required
permissions and a privacy questionnaire that justifies the personal information that their apps access and details why they
need it. “We have guidelines, and they are very clear,” Amar says.


[ Read about app certification programs for Amazon Web Services, Google Apps and Twitter ]


Any developer asking for permissions that contravene these guidelines will have to make changes in order to become certified,
he explains. “We won’t certify author[s] if we can’t understand why they want certain types of information. Why do they want
to know your friends of your political views? An answer like ‘We might need it in the future’ is not acceptable.”


Amar says the certification process is fairly painless. If a developer’s well-organized, it can take as little as 20 minutes.
Otherwise, the process could very well last weeks.


Of course, this raises a key question for developers: Why bother? Why go through such an administrative process just to get
a certification that, let’s face it, most users have never heard of?


One answer is that it allows you to establish your trustworthiness. Users who are curious can click on the “MyPermissions
Certified” logo to bring up information about the certification, along with an explanation of why you needs each permission
and what you will do with the personal data your app can now access.


Perhaps a better answer is that it may bring more users to your apps. During testing, apps that displayed the MyPermissions
Certified mark saw conversion rates rise between 5 percent and 9 percent, Amar says. (In this case, “conversion rate” means
users actually ran the applications after downloading them or signed into them using a system such Facebook Connect, rather
than abandoning them.) That’s a significant amount of numbers users – and it could provide a useful increase in revenue as
well.




Netflash




Read more about How Mobile Developers Can Win Customers" Trust and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Japan"s Abe says China"s prosperity rests on trust, not tensions

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said China’s continued economic growth will require building trust, not tensions, with other countries, according to an interview broadcast on Sunday.


Reuters: Top News



Japan"s Abe says China"s prosperity rests on trust, not tensions

Japan"s Abe says China"s prosperity rests on trust, not tensions

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said China’s continued economic growth will require building trust, not tensions, with other countries, according to an interview broadcast on Sunday.


Reuters: Top News



Japan"s Abe says China"s prosperity rests on trust, not tensions

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

“We cannot trust” Intel and Via’s chip-based crypto, FreeBSD developers say

At Those Damn Liars, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Those Damn Liars and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Those Damn Liars makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Those Damn Liars does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Those Damn Liars.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Those Damn Liars and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Those Damn Liars send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Those Damn Liars has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Those Damn Liars"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


“We cannot trust” Intel and Via’s chip-based crypto, FreeBSD developers say

Friday, November 8, 2013

Germans lose trust in US, see NSA whistleblower Snowden as hero – poll



Published time: November 08, 2013 17:34

A supporter of the Anonymous group wearing a Guy Fawkes mask holds up a placard featuring a photo of US intelligence leaker Edward Snowden and reads "A true American Hero!" during a rally in front of Berlin

A supporter of the Anonymous group wearing a Guy Fawkes mask holds up a placard featuring a photo of US intelligence leaker Edward Snowden and reads “A true American Hero!” during a rally in front of Berlin’s landmark Brandenburg Gate on November 5, 2013. (AFP Photo / DPA / Florian Schun / Germany out)




Germans’ confidence in the US as a trustworthy partner has plummeted following the NSA scandal, while Edward Snowden, who exposed America’s spying on its allies, is considered a hero by 60 percent of the population, a poll shows.


The recent chain of scandals over US global snooping has seriously damaged the opinion of Germans about their longtime ally.


Only 35 percent still see Washington as a reliable partner – a drop of 14 percent since July, according to a survey conducted by public broadcaster ARD and Die Welt daily. This year’s figures are a massive drop from the situation at the start of President Barack Obama’s presidency, when he was given an enthusiastic welcome on his first official visit to Berlin, and 76 percent of Germans said they trusted the US government in a Nov. 2009 poll. 


US President Barack Obama’s personal approval rating with Germans has also plummeted. Once a highly popular foreign politician, now Obama enjoys support from only 43 percent of Germans, while over half are unhappy with his performance. 


German Chancellor Angela Merkel – whose private mobile phone was also allegedly bugged by American security services – warned earlier that spying among friends was unacceptable. She made it clear to Obama that if the information was proven to be true, it would represented a “grave breach of trust.” Merkel also demanded that Washington sign up to a ‘no-spying’ agreement with Berlin and Paris by the end of this year.


But most Germans are not about to be fooled a second time around, it seems. Over 90 percent think that the Americans would breach a no-spying agreement anyway and continue their surveillance activities, the survey found.


Meanwhile, six out of 10 Germans consider NSA whistleblower Snowden a hero, with only 14 percent of those polled saying that the 30-year-old security specialist was a criminal. However, respondents were fairly evenly split on whether he should be given asylum in Germany: 46 percent were in favor, and 48 percent against.


German officials have ruled out granting Snowden political asylum, arguing that the NSA whistleblower is “not a political refugee.


Merkel reaffirmed Monday the importance of Berlin’s ties with Washington, making it clear that Germany would not take any steps that might harm relations with the US. 


“The trans-Atlantic alliance remains for us Germans of exceptional importance,” Merkel’s spokesman Steffen Seibert told reporters in Berlin. “There is hardly a country that has profited as much from this partnership and friendship as Germany… and this will guide the chancellor in all future decisions.


However, Germany wants Snowden to testify concerning espionage allegations against the US and the UK. Currently, Germany is considering the possibility of questioning Snowden in Moscow, where he has been since June. 


Snowden, who faces espionage charges in the US, was provided with temporary asylum in Russia in August.




RT – News



Germans lose trust in US, see NSA whistleblower Snowden as hero – poll

Friday, October 25, 2013

Bill would require all Pennsylvania public schools to display ‘In God we trust’ motto


By Travis Gettys
Friday, October 25, 2013 11:34 EDT


in_god_we_trust.istock







  • Print Friendly and PDF

  • Email this page


  • Pennsylvania lawmakers will consider a bill that would require all public schools in the state to display the national motto, “In God we trust.”


    Republican Rick Saccone, who represents parts of Allegheny and Washington counties, said the bill he’s sponsoring would celebrate the 150th anniversary of the U.S. Mint printing the motto on American currency.


    Saccone also said former Pennsylvania Gov. James Pollock suggested the motto to President Abraham Lincoln, with whom he’d shared a boarding house when both men were freshman congressmen, after he was appointed director of the U.S. Mint.


    “Pollock suggested we put ‘In God we trust’ on the coins,” Saccone said. “The treasury secretary and Abe agreed, and Congress agreed, so it became law to put that on our coins in 1864.”


    According to the U.S. Treasury, it was another Pennsylvanian, the Rev. M. R. Watkinson, who suggested a religious-themed motto, to “relieve us from the ignominy of heathenism,” and Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase directed Pollock to come up with one that reflected Americans’ “trust in God.”


    The eventual phrase apparently originated in one of the less-frequently sung verses of “The Star-Spangled Banner,” written during the War of 1812 and named as the U.S. national anthem by a 1931 congressional resolution.


    Saccone admitted the law would likely be challenged in court, but he wasn’t worried it’d be struck down.


    “It’s already settled that that is acceptable,” Saccone said. “It is our national motto by law, passed by Congress — unanimously by the way — signed into law by President Eisenhower, and reaffirmed by several Congresses after that. People will challenge anything, but we should celebrate it. It’s already been upheld.”


    The bill would require public schools to display the motto but doesn’t list any consequences for schools that don’t comply.


    As atheist activist and scientist Richard Dawkins noted in a recent interview, the motto is frequently cited as proof that the U.S. is a Christian nation.







    The Raw StoryPost id = does not exist.



    Bill would require all Pennsylvania public schools to display ‘In God we trust’ motto

Friday, September 27, 2013

THE LUCIS TRUST: SATANISM AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER

Our New World Order Update:



THE LUCIS TRUST: SATANISM AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=288116.
Video Rating: 5 / 5



THE LUCIS TRUST: SATANISM AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Google NSA Partnership - Do You Trust Them?


Google NSA Partnership - Do You Trust Them?

Google and the NSA are working together. No big deal right? Wrong. Watch the video and find out for yourself why we should all be worried when America’s most…
Video Rating: 4 / 5



Google NSA Partnership - Do You Trust Them?

Thursday, August 1, 2013

Spain"s Rajoy says he was wrong to trust treasurer in party funding scandal


Spain’s Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy looks on during a joint news conference with his Romanian counterpart Victor Ponta (L) after their meeting at Moncloa Palace in Madrid July 22, 2013 file photo.


Credit: Reuters/Juan Medina




Reuters: Top News



Spain"s Rajoy says he was wrong to trust treasurer in party funding scandal

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Debate shows Va. race all about trust


Ken Cuccinelli and Terry McAuliffe are pictured. | AP Photo

Each candidate spent their first debate casting his opponent as too slick. | AP Photo





HOT SPRINGS, Va. — They traded shots over ethics and jobs, transportation policy and Obamacare. But the 90-minute showdown between Republican Ken Cuccinelli and Democrat Terry McAuliffe on Saturday was fundamentally a debate about trust.


As in: Listen up voters, you just can’t trust the other guy.







Polls show a huge swath of the Virginia electorate still unsure what to think of the two men trying to lead the Old Dominion. So each candidate spent their first debate trying to fill in the blanks, by casting his opponent as too slick by half.


McAuliffe, in Cuccinelli’s telling, is someone who professes to care about the state — but is actually an unprincipled D.C. wheeler-dealer with a shady business past whose ego led him to run for governor.


(Also on POLITICO: Fireworks between Cuccinelli, McAuliffe)


Cuccinelli, McAuliffe countered in so many words, has said before that the economy is his driving concern — only to quickly reemerge as the zealot on social issues that has made him a hero of the religious right.


“You are the true Trojan horse of Virginia politics,” McAuliffe told his Republican rival. “You come in pretending to be one thing, and you really are something else.”


“Virginia needs a governor they can trust, not someone who tells them what they want to hear,” Cuccinelli said at another point.


The lively debate at the Homestead resort here in southwestern Virginia foreshadowed three months of nastiness in store before the November election. Both candidates were disciplined, sticking to the core messages that polls indicate give them the best chance of moving voters.


(PHOTOS: Ken Cuccinelli’s career)


McAuliffe benefited from the debate’s heavy emphasis on the scandal swirling around Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell. Cuccinelli did not initially disclose gifts from the businessman at the center of the firestorm, Star Scientific CEO Jonnie Williams, Sr., and invested in the company’s stock without reporting it.


“He was buying you $ 1,500 turkey dinners,” McAuliffe said to Cuccinelli. “You know, that’s a lot of turkey.”


Democrats believe this attack, which they plan to push with millions of dollars in ads, can give them the decisive advantage on the question of trust. A Marist-NBC poll from May found Cuccinelli ahead, 37 percent to 31 percent, when voters were asked, “Who do you trust more to do what’s best for the state?” But one-quarter of voters were unsure.


(PHOTOS: Terry McAuliffe’s career)


Where they come down may well determine the winner of the race, which neither candidate has led by more than a few points all year long.


Cuccinelli gave as good as he got, noting that he voluntarily disclosed the gifts he’d overlooked.


“No one was going to find them,” Cuccinelli said. “Does anyone in this room think Terry McAuliffe would have ever done something like that? Of course not.”


(Earlier on POLITICO: 5 things to watch in the Va. gov debate)


Cuccinelli called on McAuliffe to follow his lead and release eight years of tax returns, something the Democrat pushed Mitt Romney to do last year but has thus far refused to do himself.


“What have you got to hide?” Cuccinelli badgered his rival. “Release your tax returns!”


When the candidates got to question each other, McAuliffe noted that Cuccinelli, as a candidate for the state legislature in 2002, told voters he would focus on transportation, only to pivot back to social matters after he won.


“Why did you intentionally mislead your voters back then,” McAuliffe said, “and today are you doing the same thing in this campaign?”




POLITICO – TOP Stories



Debate shows Va. race all about trust

Debate shows Va. race all about trust


Ken Cuccinelli and Terry McAuliffe are pictured. | AP Photo

Each candidate spent their first debate casting his opponent as too slick. | AP Photo





HOT SPRINGS, Va. — They traded shots over ethics and jobs, transportation policy and Obamacare. But the 90-minute showdown between Republican Ken Cuccinelli and Democrat Terry McAuliffe on Saturday was fundamentally a debate about trust.


As in: Listen up voters, you just can’t trust the other guy.







Polls show a huge swath of the Virginia electorate still unsure what to think of the two men trying to lead the Old Dominion. So each candidate spent their first debate trying to fill in the blanks, by casting his opponent as too slick by half.


McAuliffe, in Cuccinelli’s telling, is someone who professes to care about the state — but is actually an unprincipled D.C. wheeler-dealer with a shady business past whose ego led him to run for governor.


(Also on POLITICO: Fireworks between Cuccinelli, McAuliffe)


Cuccinelli, McAuliffe countered in so many words, has said before that the economy is his driving concern — only to quickly reemerge as the zealot on social issues that has made him a hero of the religious right.


“You are the true Trojan horse of Virginia politics,” McAuliffe told his Republican rival. “You come in pretending to be one thing, and you really are something else.”


“Virginia needs a governor they can trust, not someone who tells them what they want to hear,” Cuccinelli said at another point.


The lively debate at the Homestead resort here in southwestern Virginia foreshadowed three months of nastiness in store before the November election. Both candidates were disciplined, sticking to the core messages that polls indicate give them the best chance of moving voters.


(PHOTOS: Ken Cuccinelli’s career)


McAuliffe benefited from the debate’s heavy emphasis on the scandal swirling around Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell. Cuccinelli did not initially disclose gifts from the businessman at the center of the firestorm, Star Scientific CEO Jonnie Williams, Sr., and invested in the company’s stock without reporting it.


“He was buying you $ 1,500 turkey dinners,” McAuliffe said to Cuccinelli. “You know, that’s a lot of turkey.”


Democrats believe this attack, which they plan to push with millions of dollars in ads, can give them the decisive advantage on the question of trust. A Marist-NBC poll from May found Cuccinelli ahead, 37 percent to 31 percent, when voters were asked, “Who do you trust more to do what’s best for the state?” But one-quarter of voters were unsure.


(PHOTOS: Terry McAuliffe’s career)


Where they come down may well determine the winner of the race, which neither candidate has led by more than a few points all year long.


Cuccinelli gave as good as he got, noting that he voluntarily disclosed the gifts he’d overlooked.


“No one was going to find them,” Cuccinelli said. “Does anyone in this room think Terry McAuliffe would have ever done something like that? Of course not.”


(Earlier on POLITICO: 5 things to watch in the Va. gov debate)


Cuccinelli called on McAuliffe to follow his lead and release eight years of tax returns, something the Democrat pushed Mitt Romney to do last year but has thus far refused to do himself.


“What have you got to hide?” Cuccinelli badgered his rival. “Release your tax returns!”


When the candidates got to question each other, McAuliffe noted that Cuccinelli, as a candidate for the state legislature in 2002, told voters he would focus on transportation, only to pivot back to social matters after he won.


“Why did you intentionally mislead your voters back then,” McAuliffe said, “and today are you doing the same thing in this campaign?”




POLITICO – TOP Stories



Debate shows Va. race all about trust

Monday, June 3, 2013

Apartment property trust MAA to buy Colonial Properties for $2.17 billion




Real estate investment trust Mid America Apartment Communities Inc said it would buy rival Colonial Properties Trust for about $ 2.17 billion to expand in the apartment rental market in southern United States.


U.S. apartments rents are rising and vacancy rates are falling as the economy improves. The apartment vacancy rate fell by 0.2 percentage points to 4.3 percent in the first three months of 2013 – the lowest in more than a decade.


The acquisition will give MAA an asset base of about 85,000 multifamily units in 285 properties across in the Sunbelt, the company said on Monday.


After the deal, MAA’s 10 largest markets will be Dallas/Fort Worth, Atlanta, Austin, Raleigh, Charlotte, Nashville, Jacksonville, Tampa, Orlando and Houston.


Under the deal, MAA will offer 0.36 common shares for each Colonial Properties Trust unit.


Based on MAA’s closing share price of $ 67.97 on Friday, the offer of $ 24.47 per share represents an 11 percent premium to Colonial Properties’ Friday close.


The combined company is expected to have a pro-forma equity market value of about $ 5.1 billion and a total market value of $ 8.6 billion, MAA said.


Colonial Properties Trust shares were up 5 percent at $ 23.31 in morning trade on the New York Stock Exchange. MAA shares were down more than 3 percent at $ 65.70.


(Reporting by Bijoy Koyitty in Bangalore; Editing by Saumyadeb Chakrabarty)





FOXBusiness.com



Apartment property trust MAA to buy Colonial Properties for $2.17 billion

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Meet Donors Trust: The Little-Known Group That Lets the Wealthy Secretively Fund Right-Wing Causes

Editor"s note: The following is a transcript of a Democracy Now! segment on Donors Trust, a little known group funding the Right"s agenda. 

When it comes to the wealthy funders of right-wing causes, the big names are well known: billionaires like the industrialist Koch Brothers and the casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, super PACs like Americans for Prosperity and Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS. Now, through them, hundreds of millions of dollars have poured into right-wing causes and candidates. But now it turns out this web of dark-money donations is even more secretive than we previously thought. That’s because the operations of a largely unknown group have now come to light. They’re called Donors Trust, a nonprofit charity based in Virginia.

Since 1999, Donors Trust has handed out nearly $ 400 million in private donations to more than 1,000 right-wing and libertarian groups. The fact Donors Trust has been able to quietly do so appears to explain why it exists: Wealthy donors can back the right-wing causes they want without attracting public scrutiny. Donors Trust is classified as a “donor-advised” fund under U.S. tax law, meaning its funders don’t have direct say in where their money goes. That in turn allows them to remain largely anonymous.

AMY GOODMAN: But the most detailed accounting to date shows Donors Trust funds a wish list of right-wing causes, prompting Mother Jones magazine to label it, quote, “the dark-money ATM of the right.” Donors Trust recipients include the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC, a mechanism for corporate interests to help write state laws; the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity, a media outlet that unabashedly promotes right-wing causes; and the State Policy Network, a number of right-wing think tanks that push so-called “free-market” policies.

But the major focus of Donors Trust appears to be funding the denial of global warming. More than a third of Donors Trust donations—at least $ 146 million—has gone to think tanks and other groups that challenge the science of climate change. Later in the broadcast, we’ll take a closer look at that funding of climate change denial, but first we turn to an overview of Donors Trust and look at why it’s been able to evade public scrutiny until now.

Joining us from Washington, D.C., is John Dunbar, politics editor at the Center for Public Integrity, worked on the group’s months-long investigation into Donor’s Trust. We did ask Donors Trust to join us, but they declined our request.

John Dunbar, lay out just what Donors Trust is.

JOHN DUNBAR: Well, they’re essentially a pass through. What they do is, is they act as a kind of a middleman between what are very large, well-known private foundations created by—mostly by corporate executives, like the Kochs, for example, and they direct the money of those contributions to a very large network of right-leaning, free-market think tanks across the country, including those that you’ve named. By doing—by running it through the middleman, it essentially obscures the identity of the original donors, of the folks who have provided the funds themselves. And the organization itself actually makes that clear on its own website, essentially saying people who give money to the organization can avoid being identified or being connected with potentially controversial issues.

AARON MATÉ: And John Dunbar, so the figure is $ 400 million since 1999. Why is it that all this is just coming to light now?

JOHN DUNBAR: Well, we kind of stumbled onto it, to be honest with you. We’ve been, at the Center for Public Integrity—that’s publicintegrity.org if you’d like to read our full report on it—we were looking at activities at the state level, and we were noticing a certain continuity. There was a certain sameness to what was going on in various states on these issues. And we have been looking at the American Legislative Exchange Council for quite some time, and we were looking for how these organizations were funded. And this Donors Trust organization kept popping up, and it seemed to be such an amorphously named organization. We couldn’t really figure out where it was. So we got to wondering, “Well, who’s funding Donors Trust?” And then we backed it up a step, and then we started looking at some of the more better-known right-wing, free-market foundations, particularly those run by the Koch brothers—the Searle Freedom Trust, for example, is another one; the Bradley Foundation—these are all very well-known right-leaning foundations—and found that an enormous amount of the funds that came into Donors Trust came from those—from those organizations.

AMY GOODMAN: John Dunbar, in your report, you speak with the Donors Trust president and CEO, Whitney Ball. She says much of the group’s focus is on the state level because of, quote, “gridlock” at the federal level of government means donors see, quote, “a better opportunity to make a difference in the states.” Ball also sits on the board of the State Policy Network. Can you talk about this focus on activity at the state level?

JOHN DUNBAR: Yeah, I think that—I don’t think anybody would argue with her point that it’s hard to get anything done in Washington these days. They have been a lot more successful at the state level. And I think that in Washington we have a tendency to sort of get tunnel vision: We don’t think that anything that happens outside of Washington really matters, when in fact the laws that are passed in the states are extremely important. Some of the focus of the Donors Trust recipients have been on specific state issues that, you know, affect all of us. You know, some of their favorite issues are right-to-work laws in the states; climate issues; renewable energy, as you’ll hear from Suzanne and The Guardian, which has done such great work on that; and as well as, you know, tax issues, etc. People tend to look at states and what’s happening in a particular state in isolation; they don’t look around and see that the same thing seems to be happening in other states. And it’s—this is clearly a coordinated effort to create state-based think tanks. There’s 51 of them that they’ve funded all across the country to push legislative issues. And then they created their own media empire to support—they even support the ideas behind those issues.

AARON MATÉ: Well, John Dunbar, if you could follow up on that, this media group, the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity. They receive 95 percent of their funding from the Donors Trust?

JOHN DUNBAR: Right, and that was kind of shocking, actually. You know, we—that is a foundation-financed reporting organization. I have to say that the Center for Public Integrity is also a foundation-financed reporting organization, so—however, we do not get 95 percent of our funding from any individual donor. Franklin does. The difficulty with that is that, first of all, you have to wonder what—whether the reporting is going to be influenced by that single donor. Secondly, they are a (c)3, which is—which means donations to them are tax deductible, and they don’t pay taxes themselves. That’s a public trust, by the way. That’s—the Donors Trust is in the same position. If they were not a publicly financed nonprofit, they would lose their nonprofit status. By getting all of their money or most of their money through Donors Trust, they’re able to maintain their (c)3 status as a, quote, you know, “publicly financed charity,” unquote. And if all that money came from one person, for example, they would lose that exemption, or they would be part of—they would have to be absorbed by whatever foundation it was that was funding them.

AMY GOODMAN: John, in 2009, Republicans, bloggers, conservative think tanks began to cite a report that the Obama administration had pumped billions of stimulus funds into phantom congressional districts, suggesting money intended to create jobs and shore up the economy had been misused or lost. One of the key websites to report this was newmexicowatchdog.org, which is almost entirely funded by Donors Trust. The story was picked up by Fox News, like in this report from Stuart Varney.

STUART VARNEY: Take a look at this map, please. The government is claiming jobs created in nine Oklahoma congressional districts; problem: There’s only five. Jobs in eight districts of Iowa; big problem: There’s only five. Jobs in eight districts in Connecticut; again, there’s only five. Jobs in three congressional districts in the Virgin Islands; there is only one. And as you point out, Bill, Puerto Rico, the government claims 17,544 jobs created or saved in six congressional districts; there is only one congressional district in Puerto Rico.

BILL HEMMER: I don’t know if we should be laughing or crying over this.

STUART VARNEY: No.

BILL HEMMER: I mean, Puerto Rico alone, 99th Congressional District, 98th Congressional District, a no-number congressional district.

STUART VARNEY: Yes.

BILL HEMMER: I mean, good lord!

STUART VARNEY: Yes, yes, yes. Raise your eyebrows, please. Look, it’s very bad, very unreliable statistics, and it really undermines all of these claims, these gross claims of job creation from stimulus.

AMY GOODMAN: That Fox News report was based on a report by newmexicowatchdog.org, one of the many so-called watchdog websites that are almost entirely funded by the Donors Trust. John Dunbar, your response?

JOHN DUNBAR: Well, I think that the implication of that report was that there were millions and millions of dollars that were being misspent, when the reality was it was data errors. I don’t think anyone would defend the government’s ability to create accurate databases. They clearly didn’t do a very good job on that front, at least on the Recovery Act. However, the implication that all of this money was going into a black hole was actually nonsense. It was kind of a phantom issue about phantom districts, as the Associated Press had reported. A lot of the reporting by these different watchdog organizations that are funded by Franklin has been called into question, including by the Nieman Center at Harvard that’s called it a lack in context and in some cases actually distortions of facts.

AMY GOODMAN: We’re going to break, John Dunbar, politics editor at the Center for Public Integrity, works on this months-long investigation into the Donors Trust called “Donors Use Charity to Push Free-Market Policies in States.” When we come back, Suzanne Goldenberg will also join us, of The Guardian, who’s been investigating the funding of climate denial groups. This is Democracy Now! We’ll be back in a minute.

Tue, 02/19/2013 – 09:35  
AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed


Meet Donors Trust: The Little-Known Group That Lets the Wealthy Secretively Fund Right-Wing Causes