Showing posts with label abused. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abused. Show all posts

Friday, April 4, 2014

Abused and Exploited Temp Workers May Finally Get a Break



CA bill would hold companies legally responsible for wage and safety violations of subcontractors and temp agencies.








California could become one of the first states in the nation to hold companies legally responsible for wage and safety violations by their subcontractors and temp agencies if a bill proposed Friday becomes law.


The bill tackles the longstanding complaint of labor leaders that companies can often shirk responsibility for the abuse of workers by hiring them through agencies or contracting with smaller firms.


A ProPublica investigation last year found that temp workers face high rates of wage violations and on-the-job injuries, but rarely have recourse against the brand-name companies whose products they move, pack or assemble. Typically, only the agencies or subcontractors that directly employ workers face fines when something goes wrong, even when fulfilling contracts with larger firms that indirectly control or influence the work conditions.


Unions and other worker advocates say the bill would protect temps and subcontracted workers, such as building janitors, by holding the companies at the top of the supply chain accountable.


“Current law is simply insufficient to protect workers’ rights in the shadows of the subcontracted economy,” Caitlin Vega of the California Labor Federation said in a letter supporting the bill. “This simple rule will incentivize the use of responsible contractors, rather than a race to the bottom.”


California is at least the second state this year to take up bills to protect temporary and subcontracted workers. Earlier this month, a New Hampshire legislator introduced a bill to curb the practice of charging workers fees to be taken in temp agency vans to work for unknown companies. That bill would limit such fees and require agencies to tell workers in writing their wage, the name of the company, the location of the job and the workers’ compensation insurance carrier in case of injury.


At least 10 states currently have laws that regulate temp and day labor agencies in some way. Massachusetts, Illinois, New Jersey and Texas, for example, require them to register with the state. Florida and Georgia limit or prohibit fees they can charge for transportation to and from a worksite.


But California would be one of the first to take on the companies that contract with temp agencies to supplement their workforce.


The bill, sponsored by Assemblyman Roger Hernandez, would make companies that contract for labor — for example, a warehouse, farm owner or hotel — liable if one of their subcontractors fails to pay employees their wages, provide workers’ compensation insurance or submit unemployment taxes to the state.


Such a law is likely to face steep challenges from the business community. At a labor and employment committee hearing on March 12, Jennifer Barrera of the California Chamber of Commerce said the state already had enough laws to deal with bad actors. Small businesses turn to staffing agencies to avoid the headaches that come with complying with various employment regulations, she said. A new law, she said, would only further burden them.


“They don’t want to violate the law,” she said. “But they just don’t know what to do or how to meet those obligations as we continue to increase the mandates on them.”


But Mark Schacht, deputy director of the California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, a farmworker rights group, argued that unless businesses at the top of the supply chain are liable for violations that occur on their property, they have no incentive to ensure safe and fair conditions.


Schacht pointed to California’s mixed experience regulating farm labor. The state has required farm labor contractors to be licensed for 63 years. Yet abuses continue, he said, because growers can simply claim ignorance and swap one contractor for another. Proving the grower bears responsibility could require years in court and expensive legal fees, he said.


With a strong liability law, Schacht said, “the grower knows if he doesn’t deal with a reputable contractor, he’s going to be liable. He knows that if he doesn’t supervise the contractor in the field, he’s going to be liable.”


“What will happen,” he said, “is that the bad contractors will be unable to secure contracts.”


A recent dispute in Massachusetts underscores the problem. Temp workers packaging goods destined for Dunkin’ Donuts and Subway say the temp agency failed to pay them overtime. When they complained, supervisors told them the agency didn’t have the funds for overtime because the packaging company didn’t pay them enough, according to the worker rights group, the Massachusetts Coalition for Occupational Safety and Health.


At the California hearing, Assemblyman Hernandez and various witnesses repeatedly cited stories written by ProPublica last year in arguing for better protections for temp workers.


The stories documented the growth of so-called “temp towns,” where workers can’t find jobs without going through temp agencies, and the abuses of immigrant labor brokers, who work with temp agencies to supply workers to brand-name companies. The investigation found that temp agencies consistently rank among the worst large industries for the rate of wage and hour violations.


A ProPublica analysis of workers’ compensation claims showed that temps face a significantly greater risk of getting injured on the job than permanent employees, particularly when it comes to severe injuries such as amputations.


During the hearing, some workers testified that they are often put in unsafe situations and don’t get paid their full wages on time. They explained that many workers don’t complain because they’re uncertain who their employer actually is or fear that the temp agency will stop sending them to jobs.


 Gladys Hernandez (Photo courtesy of The California Channel)

Gladys Hernandez, who was a temporary housekeeper at a DoubleTree hotel in Santa Monica, Calif., told committee members that to clean her quota of rooms each day, she sometimes had to go downstairs, clock out and then finish the rooms off the clock.


A spokeswoman for Hilton Worldwide, which owns the DoubleTree brand, said that because the hotel was a franchise, Hilton “has no ability or authority to influence or dictate any labor related issues at that property.” The franchise owner, The Procaccianti Group, did not return calls or emails seeking a response.


Hernandez said that in February, she and several coworkers complained to DoubleTree management.


“The next day,” she testified, “I was told not to come back.”


 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



Abused and Exploited Temp Workers May Finally Get a Break

Monday, March 24, 2014

Cancer Is Your Fault, Pat Robertson Tells Abused Woman

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Cancer Is Your Fault, Pat Robertson Tells Abused Woman

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Breaking Video News - Jihad Jane: From abused child to American jihadist - Reuters Investigates

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Breaking Video News - Jihad Jane: From abused child to American jihadist - Reuters Investigates

Sunday, September 22, 2013

Abused By Both Polanski And Media, "The Girl" Moves On



In March of 1977, a 13-year-old aspiring actress scored what she thought would be her big break: a magazine photo shoot with a famous movie director. What happened that day made headlines around the world: Director Roman Polanski, then 43, gave Samantha Gailey a hefty helping of champagne and Quaaludes, then raped her.


After pleading guilty to unlawful sex with a minor, Polanski fled the country before his court date and made a home in France. Now 50, Samantha Geimer (née Gailey) has written a memoir called The Girl: A Life in the Shadow of Roman Polanski. She tells NPR’s Rachel Martin that she was victimized twice: first by Polanski, and again by the media.


Interview Highlights


On coming home after the assault, confused and still feeling the effects of the drugs and alcohol


I knew it was a bad thing. I knew it was wrong. I think I kind of felt, “Gosh, I shouldn’t have been posing topless and drinking,” and kind of was figuring … it was a bad thing and I would just not really tell anyone and move on past it.


… My sister overheard me talking to my boyfriend — or ex-boyfriend — Steve, so once she overheard, then she immediately told my mother, and then she called the police, and then from there it was just a roller coaster of bad to worse.


On her hospital examination that night and facing accusations about her sexual past


At the hospital, that’s when it became clear that people thought I was lying. And then the second thing is, “Well, you must have wanted it, or you have some ulterior motive.”


… I had had sex with my boyfriend, so offered that up as information. So, yeah … there was really terrible innuendos about my mom and myself. A lot of just really nasty, untrue things.


On the realization that this event would shape the rest of her life


It was apparent almost immediately that this was going to be a lot more than we anticipated. … And then it just exploded, and our phone rang off the hook and there was people outside our house. This was a little bit before that was standard, you know. This was back before 24-hour news channels, so it was a surprise. Like, now you might expect that, but we didn’t expect it.





Samantha Geimer, now 50, has been hounded by the media ever since the 1977 incident.



Kathy Stanford/Courtesy of Atria Books

Samantha Geimer, now 50, has been hounded by the media ever since the 1977 incident.



Samantha Geimer, now 50, has been hounded by the media ever since the 1977 incident.


Kathy Stanford/Courtesy of Atria Books



On the intense media interest in her case


It affected me dramatically, probably changed who I am as a person, changed the way my life went. But since it happened, it’s hard to judge what might have been different if it didn’t happen. But I was angry, you know, angry at my poor mother who felt horrible and guilty and they’re all trying to protect me and my whole family’s traumatized, and I’m like, “I just hate you all. I hate the world.” And then after he was finally had left the country and I knew it was over and I wasn’t going to be forced to go to trial and be put on the stand, I think I kind of cut loose a little bit excessively, because it’s like, finally no one’s watching me.


On writing a book more than three decades after the event


I never thought I would want to write a book. And people say that, all these years: “You should write a book.” But it’s painful for my family — for my mom, for my husband, for my sons. So, you know, my mom had come to a lot better terms with it. And then my sons, I think that their attitude changed a little bit too, and it was like, “You know, you don’t have to let people come after you like this. You don’t have to hide. Go ahead and tell the truth. Stand up for yourself.” So, you know, it kind of gradually came about.


On Polanski’s punishment


I didn’t want him to go to jail because, to me, it was like, what’s that going to solve? He did what he did. Going to jail is not going to take it back, so I don’t see the point. I don’t think anybody cared what happened to Roman anymore. It was like, just say you did it and can we please walk away from this horrible mess that we don’t deserve. We didn’t mean to start it and we’d just like out of it now, please.


The note Polanski sent her in 2009



Dear Samantha,
I watched Marina Zenovich’s documentary for the second time and I thought I should write you this note. I want you to know how sorry I am for having so affected your life. Watching you in the film, I was impressed by your integrity and your intelligence. And you are right — they should give your mother a break! The fault was mine, not your mother’s. I hope the pressure of the media has alleviated and that your family brings you much happiness.
Best wishes, Roman Polanski




On her reaction to Polanski’s note


I was surprised. I knew he was sorry. I didn’t feel like I really needed an apology, so it wasn’t meaningful for me. But for my mom and my husband and my family, I could see, when I showed them that, that it took away some of that pain and anger they feel about it, so it was really meaningful for me in that it made my mother feel better. It made my husband feel better.


On being bound to her abuser through the media frenzy


It’s a strange thing to be tied to him in this weird way. That’s obviously not going to stop. I’m done wishing it would be over. It is the way it is. But he got such unfair treatment in the justice system. I was even upset about that when I was 14. … My dad was a criminal defense attorney, so I was kind of raised to have this American pride in our justice system. And to see what happened even at that young age, it really offended me, like, “How can the judge do that?”


I think over all these years, he has come to understand that it’s wrong, more than he used to think. And I think he regrets it, and he’s apologized and since then, we’ve both been on the wrong end of the law, the publicity, people’s comments towards both of us that are just nasty and horrible. So we end up having a lot in common, which is strange, but that’s true — that’s how this has worked out.





Arts & Life



Abused By Both Polanski And Media, "The Girl" Moves On

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

My children were abused

Dear Cary,


I am writing with a problem that makes my heart physically ache.


Let me briefly lay the groundwork first, and then I will present the problem. I was married for almost 20 years to a man who had three children from his first marriage. We had three more ourselves, and I legally adopted my oldest stepdaughter when she turned 18. My stepchildren’s mother is extremely abusive, and all three of them were physically, emotionally and/or sexually abused by her or her relatives. While I understand that she herself was a victim of the same behavior from her own family members, I cannot condone the perpetuation of the cycle. My adopted child (now 34) has worked really hard to separate herself from the traumas of her youth, only now to find that her father, my ex-husband, has now replaced her mother as the perpetrator of abuse in her life.


This daughter has a nice husband, a steady job in a call center, and a lovely son from a previous relationship. She also suffers from a mysterious auto-immune disease and severe chronic pain that nothing alleviates. She has mental problems that show up as bipolar but are probably more like PTSD. The more I study about bodywork, the more I understand that these conditions are outward manifestations of everything she has suffered and continues to suffer at the hands of her natural parents.


Continue Reading…






    




Salon.com



My children were abused

Thursday, June 13, 2013

IG: IRS Employees Abused Charge Cards and Wrote Bad Checks


Terence P. Jeffrey
CNS News
June 13, 2013


The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration revealed in a recently released audit report that in fiscal years 2010 and 2011 more than 1,000 Internal Revenue Service employees misused government charge cards issued by Citibank.


The report said that during the two years in question agency employees sent Citibank a total of 325 bad checks written on personal accounts that had insufficient funds to cover them, that agency officials with top-secret security clearances had their charge accounts suspended for failure to pay the balances, and that the IRS had a tendency of being “overly lenient” in disciplining those who misused the cards.


Despite the more than 1,000 IRS employees who misused the charge cards, the inspector general’s report found that the IRS did a “generally effective” job in controlling its employees use of the cards.


Read more



This article was posted: Thursday, June 13, 2013 at 1:12 pm


Tags: domestic news, government corruption









Infowars



IG: IRS Employees Abused Charge Cards and Wrote Bad Checks