Showing posts with label backlash. Show all posts
Showing posts with label backlash. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Backlash slaps Microsoft's 'help-a-friend-dump-XP' plea

Backlash slaps Microsoft"s "help-a-friend-dump-XP" plea
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif





Computerworld – Microsoft’s appeal to its technically-advanced customers to help friends and family ditch Windows XP did not quite work out
like the company had hoped.


Rather than jump to assist people they knew who still ran the soon-to-be-retired XP, users blasted the plea in comments appended
to Microsoft’s Friday entreaty.


“Ummm…how about NO? Is the word ‘NO’ in Microsoft’s vocabulary?” asked Steve Chabot in one of those comments posted Sunday.
“I will not advocate upgrades that require people to relearn the basics of a user interface or replace perfectly good hardware
simply for the privilege of running an overblown phone OS.”


On Friday, Microsoft asked its technically astute customers to help others migrate from Windows XP, but mentioned only Windows 8.1 as a solution. “We need your help spreading the word to ensure people are safe and secure
on modern up-to-date PCs,” wrote Brandon LeBlanc, a Microsoft marketing communications manager, in a blog post.


+ ALSO ON NETWORK WORLD What is the price of not upgrading Windows XP? +


LeBlanc suggested readers assist others in either upgrading their current Windows XP personal computer to Windows 8.1 — assuming
the hardware is up to snuff — or help them pick out a new PC to replace their aged machine.


That riled users, many of whom cited their financial straits, saying that they had neither the money for a $ 120 copy of Windows
8.1 much less hundreds more for a new computer. Business owners chimed in too, noting that their businesses rely on software
that only run on XP or arguing that to purchase new PCs would be foolish for their bottom lines when their current computers
work fine.


LeBlanc’s pitch stemmed from the impending support cut-off for Windows XP. After nearly 13 years, Microsoft will provide the
last public security updates for XP on April 8. After that date, Microsoft and outside security experts have predicted, those
XP-powered PCs will be in the crosshairs of cyber criminals.


Others blasted LeBlanc for writing what they viewed as an advertisement for Windows 8.1. “Honestly, this sounds more like
a sales pitch for Windows 8.1 than any kind of interest in what is actually best for my friends and family,” said Naru in
a Saturday comment. “Had the article actually mentioned both Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 as options, I would be able to take
it more seriously.”


Microsoft has pulled Windows 7 from its own online and retail stores, and stopped selling it to retailers last October. Still,
most retailers have stocked up on Windows 7, and continue to move the 2009 OS at prices between $ 90 and $ 100.


Nor has the company offered XP owners a discount on Windows 8.1 to tempt them into dumping the ancient OS.


Although the comments added to LeBlanc’s blog — and the hundreds posted to a story Computerworld published last Friday –
included a handful praising Windows 8 and 8.1, with the usual Linux fans touting the open-source OS as an alternative, most
objected to the new two-headed Windows 8/8.1, which features both a traditional desktop and a new tile-based, touch-first
“Metro” user interface (UI), as a replacement for XP.




Netflash




Read more about Backlash slaps Microsoft"s "help-a-friend-dump-XP" plea and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Backlash slaps Microsoft's 'help-a-friend-dump-XP' plea

Backlash slaps Microsoft"s "help-a-friend-dump-XP" plea
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif





Computerworld – Microsoft’s appeal to its technically-advanced customers to help friends and family ditch Windows XP did not quite work out
like the company had hoped.


Rather than jump to assist people they knew who still ran the soon-to-be-retired XP, users blasted the plea in comments appended
to Microsoft’s Friday entreaty.


“Ummm…how about NO? Is the word ‘NO’ in Microsoft’s vocabulary?” asked Steve Chabot in one of those comments posted Sunday.
“I will not advocate upgrades that require people to relearn the basics of a user interface or replace perfectly good hardware
simply for the privilege of running an overblown phone OS.”


On Friday, Microsoft asked its technically astute customers to help others migrate from Windows XP, but mentioned only Windows 8.1 as a solution. “We need your help spreading the word to ensure people are safe and secure
on modern up-to-date PCs,” wrote Brandon LeBlanc, a Microsoft marketing communications manager, in a blog post.


+ ALSO ON NETWORK WORLD What is the price of not upgrading Windows XP? +


LeBlanc suggested readers assist others in either upgrading their current Windows XP personal computer to Windows 8.1 — assuming
the hardware is up to snuff — or help them pick out a new PC to replace their aged machine.


That riled users, many of whom cited their financial straits, saying that they had neither the money for a $ 120 copy of Windows
8.1 much less hundreds more for a new computer. Business owners chimed in too, noting that their businesses rely on software
that only run on XP or arguing that to purchase new PCs would be foolish for their bottom lines when their current computers
work fine.


LeBlanc’s pitch stemmed from the impending support cut-off for Windows XP. After nearly 13 years, Microsoft will provide the
last public security updates for XP on April 8. After that date, Microsoft and outside security experts have predicted, those
XP-powered PCs will be in the crosshairs of cyber criminals.


Others blasted LeBlanc for writing what they viewed as an advertisement for Windows 8.1. “Honestly, this sounds more like
a sales pitch for Windows 8.1 than any kind of interest in what is actually best for my friends and family,” said Naru in
a Saturday comment. “Had the article actually mentioned both Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 as options, I would be able to take
it more seriously.”


Microsoft has pulled Windows 7 from its own online and retail stores, and stopped selling it to retailers last October. Still,
most retailers have stocked up on Windows 7, and continue to move the 2009 OS at prices between $ 90 and $ 100.


Nor has the company offered XP owners a discount on Windows 8.1 to tempt them into dumping the ancient OS.


Although the comments added to LeBlanc’s blog — and the hundreds posted to a story Computerworld published last Friday –
included a handful praising Windows 8 and 8.1, with the usual Linux fans touting the open-source OS as an alternative, most
objected to the new two-headed Windows 8/8.1, which features both a traditional desktop and a new tile-based, touch-first
“Metro” user interface (UI), as a replacement for XP.




Netflash




Read more about Backlash slaps Microsoft"s "help-a-friend-dump-XP" plea and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Backlash slaps Microsoft's 'help-a-friend-dump-XP' plea

Backlash slaps Microsoft"s "help-a-friend-dump-XP" plea
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif





Computerworld – Microsoft’s appeal to its technically-advanced customers to help friends and family ditch Windows XP did not quite work out
like the company had hoped.


Rather than jump to assist people they knew who still ran the soon-to-be-retired XP, users blasted the plea in comments appended
to Microsoft’s Friday entreaty.


“Ummm…how about NO? Is the word ‘NO’ in Microsoft’s vocabulary?” asked Steve Chabot in one of those comments posted Sunday.
“I will not advocate upgrades that require people to relearn the basics of a user interface or replace perfectly good hardware
simply for the privilege of running an overblown phone OS.”


On Friday, Microsoft asked its technically astute customers to help others migrate from Windows XP, but mentioned only Windows 8.1 as a solution. “We need your help spreading the word to ensure people are safe and secure
on modern up-to-date PCs,” wrote Brandon LeBlanc, a Microsoft marketing communications manager, in a blog post.


+ ALSO ON NETWORK WORLD What is the price of not upgrading Windows XP? +


LeBlanc suggested readers assist others in either upgrading their current Windows XP personal computer to Windows 8.1 — assuming
the hardware is up to snuff — or help them pick out a new PC to replace their aged machine.


That riled users, many of whom cited their financial straits, saying that they had neither the money for a $ 120 copy of Windows
8.1 much less hundreds more for a new computer. Business owners chimed in too, noting that their businesses rely on software
that only run on XP or arguing that to purchase new PCs would be foolish for their bottom lines when their current computers
work fine.


LeBlanc’s pitch stemmed from the impending support cut-off for Windows XP. After nearly 13 years, Microsoft will provide the
last public security updates for XP on April 8. After that date, Microsoft and outside security experts have predicted, those
XP-powered PCs will be in the crosshairs of cyber criminals.


Others blasted LeBlanc for writing what they viewed as an advertisement for Windows 8.1. “Honestly, this sounds more like
a sales pitch for Windows 8.1 than any kind of interest in what is actually best for my friends and family,” said Naru in
a Saturday comment. “Had the article actually mentioned both Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 as options, I would be able to take
it more seriously.”


Microsoft has pulled Windows 7 from its own online and retail stores, and stopped selling it to retailers last October. Still,
most retailers have stocked up on Windows 7, and continue to move the 2009 OS at prices between $ 90 and $ 100.


Nor has the company offered XP owners a discount on Windows 8.1 to tempt them into dumping the ancient OS.


Although the comments added to LeBlanc’s blog — and the hundreds posted to a story Computerworld published last Friday –
included a handful praising Windows 8 and 8.1, with the usual Linux fans touting the open-source OS as an alternative, most
objected to the new two-headed Windows 8/8.1, which features both a traditional desktop and a new tile-based, touch-first
“Metro” user interface (UI), as a replacement for XP.




Netflash




Read more about Backlash slaps Microsoft"s "help-a-friend-dump-XP" plea and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, August 24, 2013

Ben Affleck and the Batman Backlash

Ben Affleck will be the next Batman: How ’bout them apples?

Well, the Internet, which erupted Thursday night after Warner Bros. announced that Affleck will play the Caped Crusader for its Superman and Batman team-up movie, does not like them apples one bit. Jokes (many of them imagining a Batman from South Boston) flew on Twitter. Petitions with thousands of signatures were launched to urge Warner Bros. to rethink their decision.


Affleck, just months ago the toast of Hollywood for his best picture-winning “Argo,” hasn’t had so much scorn heaped on him since “Gigli.”


The response, roughly equivalent to news of the apocalypse, was undoubtedly out of proportion. After the leaden, joyless “Man of Steel,” adding Affleck — an actor of light, easy charisma and an increasingly capable filmmaker — can only improve a franchise currently in the hands of “Sucker Punch” director Zach Snyder and the beefy but unremarkable Superman actor Henry Cavill.


Affleck is likely to be far from the biggest issue for the film, which is scheduled to begin shooting next year and be released in summer 2015. He has already proven to be a more interesting Superman, too, by playing a bitter George Reeves in the atmospheric 2006 docudrama “Hollywoodland.”


There’s a long history of casting overreaction that’s later turned out laughable. There were plenty of critics when Daniel Craig, who had the audaciousness of being blond, inherited James Bond. Some, too, questioned Jennifer Lawrence’s suitability for Katniss Everdeen in “The Hunger Games.” And who would have guessed that Michael Keaton would make arguably the best of all the Batmen?


But Affleck’s casting speaks to a larger shift in this age of the superhero blockbuster. Affleck will be following in the footsteps of Christian Bale, the star of Christopher Nolan’s “Dark Knight” trilogy — the artistic apogee of the superhero movies, a series that treated its hero not as cartoon but a vessel for exploring themes of terrorism and justice.


The days of such aspirations, though, seem to be dwindling. Sam Raimi isn’t shepherding Spider-Man anymore. Most of the most popular superheros are on their second or third reboot. After the success of Joss Whedon’s “The Avengers,” Hollywood is looking increasingly to pairing its comics. Another “Avengers” film is on the way. And after the Superman-Batman movie, a “Justice League” film (with Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Flash, Aquaman and others) is rumored to follow.


These are the kinds of projects that could be seen as a sign of jumping the shark if this wasn’t a movie genre built on men in tights. The superhero blockbuster, still the biggest draw at the multiplex (with $ 408.2 million, “Iron Man 3″ is easily this year’s biggest box-office hit), has made gimmickry a way of business, not a fault.


In the past, superhero movies didn’t need stars: The brand was the main attraction.


But being a major star, Affleck comes with a lot of baggage that many expect will grate similar to how George Clooney did in Joel Schumacher’s 1997 “Batman and Robin” — a film so bad, it’s often been cited as a catalyst for more serious, dramatic interpretations of superheros.


It’s ironic because Affleck has appeared to ape the career of Clooney (a producer on “Argo”) by shifting into directing and flirting with politics. Affleck, 41, will take on Batman at a slightly older age and in a more established place in his career. But he’ll be best to listen to another piece of advice from Clooney: At least don’t let them put nipples on the Batman suit.


© Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.




Newsmax – America



Ben Affleck and the Batman Backlash

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Senate Plan to Militarize Border Draws Backlash


Alex Altman
swampland.time.com
July 8, 2013


Just two weeks ago, Republican Senators were boasting about big plans to spend $ 46 billion over the next 10 years to enhance security on the southern border. “Almost overkill,” Tennessee Republican Bob Corker said of the plan. “Well oversufficient,” added Arizona Republican John McCain. “We’ll be the most militarized border since the fall of the Berlin Wall.” The Senators meant this as a good thing.


But as the bill moves to the House, the excess is beginning to look like a liability. The deal, which helped pass the Senate rewrite of U.S. immigration laws, is unlikely to sway House Republicans who insist on securing the border before some 11 million undocumented immigrants can begin the naturalization process. And it is alienating allies who are vital to immigration reform’s chances in the House, including a prominent Latino advocacy group and at least one Democratic Representative.


In an unexpected wrinkle, even authorities on the border are balking, saying the influx of agents could create more problems than it would solve. “The majority of the sheriffs I’ve talked to are not in favor of an additional 19,000 border-patrol agents,” says Donald Reay, executive director of the Texas Border Sheriff’s Coalition, whose members are still weighing the Senate bill. Reay has concerns about where the agents would be stationed and the time it could take to perform background checks on so many new hires.


Read more


This article was posted: Monday, July 8, 2013 at 4:23 pm


Tags: domestic news









Infowars



Senate Plan to Militarize Border Draws Backlash

Monday, June 3, 2013

Al Gore backlash: Why environmentalists are celebrating rising CO2 levels


Mike Adams
Natural News
June 3, 2013


Thank goodness carbon dioxide levels are finally rising ever so slightly in our atmosphere, bringing much-needed carbon dioxide to the plants and forests of the world which have been starving for CO2. The lack of CO2 in the atmosphere is one of the most devastating limiting factors for plant growth and reforestation of the planet, and at just 400ppm — that’s just 400 micrograms per kilogram — carbon dioxide is so low that Earth’s plant life can barely breathe.


Author’s note: I have added substantially to this story since it was first published in order to attempt to educate what appear to be a mass of brainwashed, mathematically illiterate commenters on Facebook who demonstrate a wholesale inability to process information with anything resembling rationality on this subject.


Let me clarify three things before we even get into the story:


#1 – NO, I do not support the coal and oil industry, and in fact I think they are terrible polluters of our planet for lots of reasons that have nothing to do with CO2. As it turns out, all the coal and oil being burned across our world right now only slightly impacts CO2 levels, especially when compared with CO2 emissions by ocean life. So my support of CO2 as an essential plant nutrient in no way is any kind of endorsement of the oil and coal industries. My long track record of activism against corporate monopolists is irrefutably solid.


#2 – YES, CO2 is an essential plant nutrient. Despite all the idiotic beliefs of people who have been brainwashed by Al Gore into believing scientific mythologies, higher CO2 levels support faster plant growth and the re-greening of our planet, period! Anyone who disagrees with this is flatly uninformed, brainwashed or just plain ignorant of plant biology (and that’s a lot of people). Recent science is proving that rising CO2 levels are, in fact, expanding plant growth and reforestation around the world. Read Increase in Carbon Dioxide Levels “Greening” the Deserts at NatureWorldNews.com or read the press release from the original researchers out of Australia who documented this correlation. And everybody needs to read www.PlantsNeedCO2.org


#3 – The current level of CO2 in Earth’s atmosphere is 400ppm. By comparison, Oxygen exists in the atmosphere at 210,000ppm. When you exhale, your own breath contains 40,000ppm of CO2, and if you know anything about emergency first aid, then you know that breathing this 40,000ppm of CO2 into another person’s body (mouth-to-mouth resuscitation) is a lifesaving action. It’s not uncommon for CO2 to reach levels of 3000ppm in homes, schools and offices. OSHA allows workers to work in environments with up to 5000ppm of CO2. (Because, again, oxygen is present at 210,000ppm, vastly out-weighing the CO2.)


So all this talk of carbon dioxide threatening the entire planet at just 400ppm — less than one-half of 1/1000th of the air — is pure nonsense. Total quack science fearmongering.


  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t



In fact, most of what we’ve all been told about CO2 over the pat few years is a complete lie. It’s time to stop believing these lies and wake up to reality. Most importantly, stop defending the CO2 / global warming hoax. Yes, CO2 is rising, but it’s mostly from non-human activity, and rising levels actually support forests and plants everywhere.


How did I “wake up” to this information? It’s simple: I used to be a believer in the CO2 hoax until I really began to study plant physiology and aquaponics production. Only then did I discover that CO2 is a vital nutrient for plant growth and that levels of CO2 in the atmosphere were radically deficient for optimal reforestation and plant biology. My awakening to this in no way means I endorse coal or oil industries, both of which are dirty polluters of the planet. But I am no longer allowing myself to be conned by the likes of Al Gore who has successfully convinced far too many people that their own breath is a global pollutant that needs to be regulated and taxed.


The CO2 scam is nothing more than a global tax moneymaking scheme being pushed by people who hope to get rich off our collective guilt for a problem that’s entirely fabricated and fictional.


My original story continues here:


Throughout the history of our planet, atmospheric CO2 was much, much higher, and it supported eras of lush rainforests, rapid plant growth and far greater biodiversity than what we see today. In fact, 525 million years ago, Earth’s atmospheric CO2 levels were as high at 7,000 ppm — and far from the planet “dying” as global warming hoax pushers try to claim, it was one of the most lush and biodiverse times in our planet’s history.


As the following chart clearly shows, CO2 levels are at one of their lowest levels in the history of our planet:



Carbon dioxide is greening the planet
Global warming alarmists and hoaxers, of course, have warned that CO2 levels crossing the threshold of 400ppm will spell certain doom for the human race. What they don’t mention is that rising CO2 levels actually set off a “global greening,” complete with forests re-growing at an accelerated rate, gardens producing more food and arid regions seeing a restoration of green plants.


In fact, a study just published in Geophysical Research Letters has documented that a 14% increase in CO2 levels in the atmosphere gave rise to a 5% – 10% increase in green foliage, with a total increase in plant “cover” of 11%. That study is entitled, CO2 fertilisation has increased maximum foliage cover across the globe’s warm, arid environments.


That study refers to CO2 as a “fertilizer” that causes a “fertilization effect.” As the study authors explain:


Our results confirm that the anticipated CO2 fertilization effect is occurring alongside ongoing anthropogenic perturbations to the carbon cycle and that the fertilisation effect is now a significant land surface process.


CO2, you see, isn’t a “pollutant.” It’s a nutrient!


By the way, your body is 18% carbon and 65% oxygen. (I’m going to pre-empt some stupid Facebook trolls who will say, “Not true! Your body is 75% water!” by answering in advance that H2O is made of hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen has such a low atomic weight, however, that it doesn’t contribute more than about 10% to your total body mass. Then again, trying to teach science to Facebook trolls is a lot like trying to teach pigs to write javascript.)


In total, you are 83% made of the same stuff as CO2, just in a different molecular arrangement. CO2 is, of course, constantly reformed and recycled throughout the planetary ecosystem. Ocean biological activity alone produces 90 billion tons of CO2 each year — many multiples of the far smaller amount produced by human activity (about 6 billion tons). If CO2 alone caused global warming and global death, we’d all be dead by now. It turns out that CO2 actually helps fertilize the growth and restoration of plants and forests!


Ocean plants love carbon dioxide, too!
By the way, it’s not just land plants that are starving for CO2. Marine plants also need more CO2, and most marine biology came into being in a time when CO2 levels were far higher than they are today.


The higher CO2 levels are in the atmosphere, the more CO2 gets absorbed into ocean water, making it available to help marine plants thrive. This CO2, importantly, is also used to build coral reefs.


Wait a second! Haven’t we all been told that CO2 is destroying coral reefs? I used to think so, too, because I hadn’t scrutinized the science closely enough. But if you really dig into this issue, it turns out that coral reefs are largely being destroyed by toxic chemical runoff from human activity, not from CO2.


If you love plants and forests and gardens, you gotta love CO2
The bottom line in all this is that if you love plant life on planet Earth, you’ve gotta love carbon dioxide. CO2 is the key nutrient that’s needed to bolster the rapid growth of nearly all plants, and right now Earth’s atmosphere is in a state of carbon dioxide deficiency.


That’s why professional greenhouse owners actually pump CO2 into their greenhouses to increase plant production.


Rising CO2 levels are a huge benefit to plant life across the planet. Hare-brained plans to “sequester” CO2 will cause an artificial reduction in this crucial plant nutrient, resulting in the mass global die-off of plants and the thinning of forests. Carbon sequestration is, quite literally, plant starvation and an attack against Mother Nature.


So don’t buy into the disinfo hawked by CO2 alarmists like Al Gore. They are pushing an utterly fictional story about how “CO2 will destroy the world” and end human civilization if we don’t stop its rise. I welcome rising CO2 levels and being scientifically trained, I know that carbon dioxide only exists at less than 1/1000th of the atmosphere. In fact, it’s currently at less than half of 1/1000th of the atmosphere. That’s an extremely small amount of CO2 — just 400ppm. And it’s just barely enough to keep Earth’s plants from dying en masse.

Conclusion:

• CO2 is an essential plant nutrient that accelerates the growth of plants, gardens and forests.


• CO2 is present in the atmosphere at just 400 ppm. By comparison, oxygen is present at 210,000 ppm. There is barely any CO2 in the atmosphere at all.


• Higher CO2 levels means better reforestation and “greening” of the planet. As CO2 levels rise, barren regions are able to “re-green” with trees that couldn’t grow there before.


• CO2 is chronically deficient in the atmosphere today; many plants are “starving” for carbon dioxide.


• NO, I do not support the oil and gas industries. In fact, there is hardly any link between energy usage and the rise of CO2 in the atmosphere. The vast majority of CO2 emissions come from biology, not burning fossil fuels.



This article was posted: Monday, June 3, 2013 at 12:28 pm









Infowars



Al Gore backlash: Why environmentalists are celebrating rising CO2 levels

Monday, March 11, 2013

VIDEO: Congress News - WASHINGTON, Leon Panetta, Barack Obama

Congress urged to pass vote changes for IMFDistinguished Warfare Medal Honoring Drone Pilots Faces Bipartisan BacklashLawmakers: Obama wooing might break budget logjamObama eases export controls on some military spare parts

Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.


To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.


VIDEO: Congress News - WASHINGTON, Leon Panetta, Barack Obama