Showing posts with label Affleck. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Affleck. Show all posts

Friday, February 28, 2014

From Ben Affleck and George Clooney to Madonna and Bono: A scorecard for celebrities in Africa





NAIROBI, Kenya — This Wednesday, Ben Affleck testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee as an expert on Africa. Yes, Ben Affleck: actor-director Ben Affleck, Argo Ben Affleck and, lest we forget, J-Lo Ben Affleck. Ben Affleck, whose tuxedo stands a decent chance of being analyzed on live television during the Oscars this Sunday. He was invited to guide American lawmakers on their policy toward the Democratic Republic of Congo.


Ridiculous, right? Actually, no. Affleck has been involved in eastern Congo for years now. In 2010, he set up an organization called the Eastern Congo Initiative after making repeated visits to the region. It raises money and funnels it to local civil society organizations. Affleck’s commitment and sustained engagement means that if you’re looking for an advocate who has some clue about what’s actually going on and doesn’t need to take his lines from a teleprompter, you could do a whole lot worse.


If you’re going to be a celebrity with a cause in Africa — and sometimes it seems like the continent has been colonized by the A-Z listers — you could do worse then follow Affleck’s lead. A lot worse.


To help you separate the serious from the silly, we present GlobalPost’s Africa Celebrity Do-Gooder Scorecard.


Note: this list is not exhaustive, as it appears to be an unspoken rule that pretty much every celebrity has to say something about Africa at some point. Feel free to tweet your own suggestions using the hashtag #StarsLoveAfrica.


Ben Affleck – Congo/peace


Score: *****


Quiet commitment, strong focus


He does it quietly (the Affleck name isn’t anywhere to be found on the ECI website) and with an unusual degree of humility for a celebrity. Academics, analysts and self-declared experts may scoff at his credentials but he’s spent time on the ground and has shown commitment over time. He’s cajoled American lawmakers before speaking to Congress in 2012 and when he speaks it attracts attention to a place often ignored.




George Clooney speaking to John Kerry and John Prendergast of the Enough Project after a press conference in Juba marking the beginning of South Sudan’s vote for independence. (Tim Freccia/Enough Project/GlobalPost)


George Clooney – Sudan/peace


Score: *****


Sustained engagement, money where his mouth is


Clooney has shown long-term commitment to Sudan’s restive regions, first in Darfur, then southern Sudan, the disputed territory of Abyei and rebel-held Nuba Mountains. With his own money, he funds the Satellite Sentinel Project [http://www.satsentinel.org/] which tracks and exposes war crimes and human rights abuses along the contested border between South Sudan and Sudan. His protests against President Omar al-Bashir’s regime have seen him (and his father) arrested in Washington.




Mia Farrow takes part in a mass at the Bossangoa cathedral on November 10, 2013. (Matthieu Alexandre/AFP/Getty Images)


Mia Farrow – Darfur/peace


Score: ****


Sustained engagement, emotional investment


The actress and ex-wife of Woody Allen has invested herself in Darfur for years and visited the conflict-riddled western region of Sudan in 2004. She’s also spoken on a range of other examples of mass atrocity and manmade human suffering in Africa and elsewhere, although she’s awfully free and easy with the G-word (genocide, that is). There’s little doubting her sincerity and long-standing commitment, but it also begs the question of how effective celebrity-led advocacy is: after all the years of attention and concern the conflict in Darfur rumbles on regardless.




Oprah Winfrey poses at the inaugural graduation of the class of 2011 at Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy (Michelly Rall/Getty Images)


Oprah Winfrey – South Africa/education


Score: ***


Big investment showed money can’t buy everything


The television host and actress opened her $ 40 million Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls (zero points for humility here) in South Africa in 2007. Within a year it was mired in allegations of sexual and physical abuse. After this rocky start the academy got its house in order and has been doing what it was supposed to do: give poor South African girls the opportunity for a better life.




(Danny Gohlke/DDP/Getty Images)


Bono & Geldof – Africa/ending poverty


Score: **


Aid lobby pioneers, “c###s”


The modern celebrity obsession with Africa, or at least being seen in Africa, can be traced back to Bob Geldof’s 1984 Band Aid song and 1985’s Live Aid concert. The U2 frontman and the Irish rocker have long been outspoken activists and advocates for aid to Africa roping fellow celebrities, the rich and powerful into their efforts. Neither are shy of using Africa to make a bit of cash with Bono and his wife advertising Louis Vitton luggage and Geldof setting up a private equity fund. Their brand of musical money-raising to end poverty rubs a lot of people the wrong way but undoubtedly the most invective-filled response comes courtesy of British comedy writer Jane Bussman whose stand-up show “Bono and Geldof Are C###s” sold out both the Sydney Opera House and London’s Frontline Club last year.




(Amos Gumulira/AFP/Getty Images)


Madonna – Malawi/education


Score: *


Half-baked idea, poorly executed


Oh dear. When faced with a torrent of criticism for her preferential quicky adoption of her first Malawian child, a boy called David Banda in 2006, Madonna set up a charity to build an academy in Malawi to improve the lives of those not lucky enough to be rescued by a global music star. The charity all-but collapsed in a riot of corruption allegations and name-calling. Madonna’s falling-out with Malawi seemed complete when State House called her a “bully” (and much else besides). Others, including writer Binyavanga Wainaina, then weighed in with their own scathing assessments of Madonna’s attempted do-goodery. Today the charity limps on, building primary schools and sponsoring kids in Malawi.




(Tristan Fewings/Getty Images)


Vivienne Westwood – Kenya/fashion (yes, fashion)


Score: *


Wrong-headed


The flame-haired enfant terrible of fashion, dressmaker to the ‘70s punk scene, and designer of vertiginous footware visited a Nairobi slum a few years ago and vamping it up alongside models in a shoot for her Ethical Fashion Initiative, which pays local folk in Kibera to stitch together handbags to sell to wealthy Westerners (for around $ 200). In our humble opinion, it is hard to see how any of this offers the seamstresses of Kibera much more than the opportunity to be the authentically slummy backdrop to a photo shoot.




(Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)


Elizabeth McGovern – Sierra Leone/Christianity


Score: -


Clueless, embarrassing for all involved


Downton Abbey’s Lady Cora went to Sierra Leone last year as an ambassador for child-sponsoring evangelical Christian charity World Vision. It did not go well. She became a laughing-stock after a journalist from London’s Daily Telegraph invited along to cover her trip reported that she couldn’t tell the difference between Darfur (war-torn western region of Sudan) and Dakar (seaside capital of peaceful Senegal). Nor did she know much about the country she was visiting or the charity she was with. Amanda Taub and Kate Cronin-Furman of ‘Wronging Rights’ comprehensively shredded the whole sorry affair in this article for Warscapes.


http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/africa/140227/ben-affleck-and-george-clooney-madonna-and-bono-scorecard-celebr




GlobalPost – Home



From Ben Affleck and George Clooney to Madonna and Bono: A scorecard for celebrities in Africa

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Affleck: Political money feels "gross"

Ben Affleck is shown. | Reuters

Affleck said he grew up in a very political house. | Reuters





Ben Affleck might seem like a political junkie, but the actor appears to have soured on the political system.


Asked by Playboy magazine to explain how he came about his interest in politics, Affleck said: “I grew up in a house with a mother who was a teacher and a Freedom Rider—very left-wing Democrats living in a heterogeneous working-class neighborhood. I picked up a lot of those values there, and I brought them with me when I showed up in Hollywood.”







Affleck talked about having a connection to the presidential campaigns for former Vice President Al Gore and then-Sen. John Kerry — as well as President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign.


(PHOTOS: Celebrities and their D.C. pet causes)


“Over time I became disillusioned, mostly with the pernicious effect of money in politics. I realized it was about raising $ 56,000 through a couple of dinners and those bundlers who bring in $ 1 million or $ 2 million. Those people are dedicated, and they believe in what they’re doing. I believe in why many of them are doing it. What I don’t believe in is that we now have the need to do it. And for me personally, it started to feel gross.”


Affleck said he hasn’t liked “being used as a prop to schmooze people and try to milk the teat of the donor for money.”


“We’d do it sparingly. Matt and I did a thing for Elizabeth Warren, whom we like and who won. We did a fund-raiser for Cory Booker, whom we also like. People now know me as a Democrat, and that will always be the case to some extent.”


Asked if he’d support a Hillary Clinton presidential run in 2016, Affleck said, “I haven’t abandoned it, but I look at working in politics again with a more jaundiced eye.” And, as for his own political ambition, Affleck says, “I don’t give it serious thought, because it would take me away from what I consider to be the prime of my storytelling career. … . I don’t know what the future holds when I’m 55, 65 or 75. Right now it’s about making movies I believe in, that I think will thrill and entertain and be meaningful to audiences.”




POLITICO – Congress



Affleck: Political money feels "gross"

Ben Affleck: Raising Money for Democrats Made Me "Feel Gross"

Hollywood star Ben Affleck, who has played an active role in Democratic politics, says fundraising for politicians began to “feel gross.”

Speaking to Playboy magazine about helping to campaign for presidential candidates Al Gore, John Kerry and Barack Obama, Affleck recalled, “Over time I became disillusioned, mostly with the pernicious effect of money in politics. I realized it was about raising $ 56,000 through a couple of dinners, and those bundlers who bring in $ 1 million or $ 2 million.”


He continued, “Those people are dedicated, and they believe in what they’re doing. I believe in why many of them are doing it. What I don’t believe in is that we now have the need to do it. And for me personally, it started to feel gross.”


Asked what part in particular, Affleck responded, “Being used as a prop to schmooze people and try to milk the teat of the donor for money. We’d do it sparingly. Matt and I did a thing for Elizabeth Warren, whom we like and who won. We did a fundraiser for Cory Booker, whom we also like. People now know me as a Democrat, and that will always be the case to some extent.”


But they may not see him campaigning for Hillary Clinton in 2016. “I haven’t abandoned it, but I look at working in politics again with a more jaundiced eye,” Affleck said.


“Hillary does excite me, in the same way the potent symbolism of the first African-American president was what thrilled people about Obama. It’s similar with Hillary and gender equality. The idea that 100 years after women got the right to vote, to have a woman president would be exciting,” he added.


As for whether he would ever consider running for office, Affleck said, “I don’t give it serious thought, because it would take me away from what I consider to be the prime of my storytelling career. I feel more in touch with that and what I want to do than I ever have. I wouldn’t step away from that for anything.”

Related Stories:


© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Ben Affleck: Raising Money for Democrats Made Me "Feel Gross"

Saturday, August 24, 2013

Ben Affleck and the Batman Backlash

Ben Affleck will be the next Batman: How ’bout them apples?

Well, the Internet, which erupted Thursday night after Warner Bros. announced that Affleck will play the Caped Crusader for its Superman and Batman team-up movie, does not like them apples one bit. Jokes (many of them imagining a Batman from South Boston) flew on Twitter. Petitions with thousands of signatures were launched to urge Warner Bros. to rethink their decision.


Affleck, just months ago the toast of Hollywood for his best picture-winning “Argo,” hasn’t had so much scorn heaped on him since “Gigli.”


The response, roughly equivalent to news of the apocalypse, was undoubtedly out of proportion. After the leaden, joyless “Man of Steel,” adding Affleck — an actor of light, easy charisma and an increasingly capable filmmaker — can only improve a franchise currently in the hands of “Sucker Punch” director Zach Snyder and the beefy but unremarkable Superman actor Henry Cavill.


Affleck is likely to be far from the biggest issue for the film, which is scheduled to begin shooting next year and be released in summer 2015. He has already proven to be a more interesting Superman, too, by playing a bitter George Reeves in the atmospheric 2006 docudrama “Hollywoodland.”


There’s a long history of casting overreaction that’s later turned out laughable. There were plenty of critics when Daniel Craig, who had the audaciousness of being blond, inherited James Bond. Some, too, questioned Jennifer Lawrence’s suitability for Katniss Everdeen in “The Hunger Games.” And who would have guessed that Michael Keaton would make arguably the best of all the Batmen?


But Affleck’s casting speaks to a larger shift in this age of the superhero blockbuster. Affleck will be following in the footsteps of Christian Bale, the star of Christopher Nolan’s “Dark Knight” trilogy — the artistic apogee of the superhero movies, a series that treated its hero not as cartoon but a vessel for exploring themes of terrorism and justice.


The days of such aspirations, though, seem to be dwindling. Sam Raimi isn’t shepherding Spider-Man anymore. Most of the most popular superheros are on their second or third reboot. After the success of Joss Whedon’s “The Avengers,” Hollywood is looking increasingly to pairing its comics. Another “Avengers” film is on the way. And after the Superman-Batman movie, a “Justice League” film (with Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Flash, Aquaman and others) is rumored to follow.


These are the kinds of projects that could be seen as a sign of jumping the shark if this wasn’t a movie genre built on men in tights. The superhero blockbuster, still the biggest draw at the multiplex (with $ 408.2 million, “Iron Man 3″ is easily this year’s biggest box-office hit), has made gimmickry a way of business, not a fault.


In the past, superhero movies didn’t need stars: The brand was the main attraction.


But being a major star, Affleck comes with a lot of baggage that many expect will grate similar to how George Clooney did in Joel Schumacher’s 1997 “Batman and Robin” — a film so bad, it’s often been cited as a catalyst for more serious, dramatic interpretations of superheros.


It’s ironic because Affleck has appeared to ape the career of Clooney (a producer on “Argo”) by shifting into directing and flirting with politics. Affleck, 41, will take on Batman at a slightly older age and in a more established place in his career. But he’ll be best to listen to another piece of advice from Clooney: At least don’t let them put nipples on the Batman suit.


© Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.




Newsmax – America



Ben Affleck and the Batman Backlash

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Garner: Affleck political future possible


Ben Affleck’s wife, actress Jennifer Garner, wouldn’t be surprised to see the Oscar award-winning director turn to politics in the future.


“Right now, [Ben] feels like he can do more good for people politically from outside the system,” Garner said, according to a People Magazine report out Tuesday.


“Would I be surprised if one day he did go into politics? No. But not now,” Garner said, adding that she supports the idea.


Affleck directed and starred in “Argo,” the Best Picture winner at the 2012 Academy Awards. His name was briefly floated as a possible candidate to replace now-Secretary of State John Kerry in the Senate, but he ultimately decided  not to run for the seat.


Read more about: , ,




POLITICO – CLICK – Full Blog



Garner: Affleck political future possible