Showing posts with label bipartisan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bipartisan. Show all posts

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Bipartisan Concern Emerges Over Comcast, Time Warner Cable Merger


breitbart.com
February 23, 2014


Politicians agree upon little in the Age of Obama, but bipartisan concerns greeted the proposed $ 45 billion merger between Comcast and Time Warner Cable.


The matter should intensify in the coming weeks as hearings flesh out the details behind the plan.


Sen. Al Franken, the MN Democratic who once toiled on behalf of Saturday Night Live, fears the plan will result in higher cable bills and worse service.


“There’s not enough competition in this space, and what we need is more competition, not less,” Franken said in a statement to The Hill.



Read more


This article was posted: Sunday, February 23, 2014 at 12:34 pm









Infowars



Bipartisan Concern Emerges Over Comcast, Time Warner Cable Merger

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Poll: "Broad, Bipartisan Support For Increased Sanctions"


A new poll from the Israel Project on Americans’ thoughts on President Obama’s deal with Iran:


New Iran Poll: Broad, Bipartisan Support For Increased Sanctions; Voters Call For Congressional Approval Of Final Iran Deal



The Weekly Standard



Poll: "Broad, Bipartisan Support For Increased Sanctions"

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Bipartisan voting rights bill coming soon

A voting sign is pictured. | AP Photo

The bill addresses a section of the VRA that was struck down by the Supreme Court. | AP Photo





A revision of the Voting Rights Act that was partially struck down by the Supreme Court last year will be unveiled in Congress today, aides confirmed.


A bipartisan group — including House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.) and Ranking Member John Conyers (D-Mich.) — began working on a new way to approach the law, which previously required that certain states with a history of voting discrimination receive clearance from the Justice Department or federal courts before changing their election laws. The Supreme Court ruled that the selection of states that must comply with the law could not be based on decades-old factors.







House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) wouldn’t discuss any details of the new proposal, but praised its crafting.


“I’m pleased with what I see as birpartisan progress that is being made on addressing the Voting Rights Act,” Pelosi said. “While it’s not the bill everyone will love, it is bipartisan, it is progress and it is worthy of support.”




POLITICO – Congress



Bipartisan voting rights bill coming soon

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Alexander touts bipartisan record

Lamar Alexander is pictured. | AP Photo

The Republican senator says he has to have support from Democrats as well. | AP Photo





Washington may be toxic to voters — especially Republicans — but Lamar Alexander believes his incumbency will be an asset as he fights off a conservative primary challenge in Tennessee.


The Republican senator said he is emphasizing — even to GOP primary voters — the areas where he has been able to work with Democrats to pass laws during a particularly dry season of lawmaking in Congress. The strategy of highlighting his bipartisan dealmaking is a marked contrast to other Republicans dealing with challengers from the right, many of whom are highlighting their rock-solid opposition to Democratic policy.







“It takes 60 votes to get a result and we have 45 Republicans. If I’m going to fix the debt or lower the student loan rate or give parents more school choice, I’m going to have to have some Democratic support to do it. Tennesseans understand that,” Alexander said in a wide-ranging interview with POLITICO.


(PHOTOS: 10 must-watch House races in 2014)


To rebut conservative groups like Club for Growth and Heritage Action for America that take a dim view of Alexander each year in their annual scorecards, the two-term senator is releasing his own scorecard that highlights his stewardship of nine bills into law. Among the accomplishments he is hyping are a revamp of the federal student loan program and a new drug safety law — achievements Alexander believes stick out in a gridlocked 2013.


“Congress and the president only signed into law 72 laws and I found a way to be a part of nine of those,” Alexander said. “It’s very satisfying to me when I get a chance to work and work across party lines.”


That’s not to say even he believes his record is perfect. Alexander admitted he now regrets his vote in support of the “Cash for Clunkers” program, intended to spur the American auto industry. But he stands strong behind a vote that most riled grassroots conservatives: His support of the Senate’s comprehensive immigration bill.


He said he hears little from people back home criticizing his vote for the immigration legislation, which spurred the conservative machinery back home to find a candidate to challenge him.


(PHOTOS: Lamar Alexander’s top aide investigated for child porn)


“I hear about it from people who like that fact I did something about it,” Alexander said. “For the Congress not to deal with immigration is indefensible. The Nashville City Council can’t do it, the governor of Tennessee can’t do it. It’s the job of the president and the Congress to do and we’re just allowing de facto 11 million people to break the rule of law when we don’t do something about it.”


The former governor, presidential candidate and education secretary insulated himself from higher-profile challenges by locking up endorsements from much of the Tennessee congressional delegation, which means he won’t be facing the same sort of conservative firepower in his August primary as some other Senate GOP incumbents.


The highest-profile challenger Alexander has drawn is conservative state Rep. Joe Carr, and there has been little comprehensive polling done on the race.


Manu Raju contributed to this report.




POLITICO – Congress



Alexander touts bipartisan record

Bombshell bipartisan Senate report: Benghazi was preventable


A bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report on Benghazi has just been released, and it is worse news for Hillary Clinton than Bridgegate is for Chris Christie. Adam Goldman and Anne Gearan of the Washington Post report:


The bipartisan report lays out more than a dozen findings regarding the assaults on Sept. 11 and 12, 2012 on the diplomatic compound and a CIA annex in the Libyan city of Benghazi. It says the State Department failed to increase security at the sites despite warnings, and faults intelligence agencies for not sharing information about the existence of the CIA outpost with the U.S. military.


The committee determined that the U.S. military command in Africa didn’t know about the CIA annex and didn’t have the resources to defend the diplomatic compound in an emergency. (snip)


The report also notes, chillingly, that the FBI’s investigation into the attacks has been hampered inside Libya, and that 15 people “supporting the investigation or otherwise helpful to the United States” have since been killed in Benghazi. The report says it is unclear whether those killings were related to the investigation. (snip)


The report says it was problematic that the CIA and State Department were not working out of the same facility together in the dangerous Benghazi environment. That meant the CIA and its well-trained contractors, who had served in elite U.S. forces, were not on location at the diplomatic outpost in case of a crisis.



There is a lot more that is going to come out. Senator Chambliss is speaking to Fox News, and we are promised further revelations. The State Department was repeatedly warned of 9/11 danger, and disregarded it. There were terrorist training bases affiliated with Al Qaeda established in Benghazi, according to a report by Catherine Herridge. And as already reported, wihin minutes, the Whitre House knew it was a terror attack, not a spontaneous demonstration.


Big Fur Hat has created a startling graphic that deserves to be plastered on bumpers, light poles, fences, and elsewhere visible all over the country.





American Thinker Blog



Bombshell bipartisan Senate report: Benghazi was preventable

Friday, November 1, 2013

Bipartisan House gives in to Wall Street and passes Dodd-Frank rollback drafted by Citigroup lobbyists

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Bipartisan House gives in to Wall Street and passes Dodd-Frank rollback drafted by Citigroup lobbyists

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Hip-Hop Gaining Bipartisan Embrace From Pols



In early 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama sat down for an interview with Black Entertainment Television. The friendly dialogue provided Obama, then mired in a closely contested primary campaign against Hillary Clinton, a chance to touch on a range of political and cultural topics.


Asked if he liked hip-hop music, Obama responded, “Of course,” adding, “I’ve got to admit, lately I’ve been listening to a lot of Jay-Z. This new ‘American Gangster’ album is tight.”


It wasn’t the first time Obama publicly discussed hip-hop, and it wouldn’t be the last. At a campaign stop in 2008, he mimicked dusting off his shoulder, an allusion to a hit Jay-Z song. He has gone on to describe himself as a fan of Nas, Lil Wayne and Kanye West.


Obama’s promotion of the genre — unprecedented for a viable national political candidate — helped launch a new era in which political figures of both parties can embrace the once politically toxic music, though they do so with some degree of caution.


Although hip-hop can be traced back to the 1970s, it became a cultural force in the 1980s. Ronald Reagan references have been a mainstay ever since Ice-T criticized the 40th president over the Iran-contra scandal: “We buy weapons to keep us strong/ Reagan sends guns where they don’t belong.”


In 1991, N.W.A. rapper Eazy-E donated $ 2,490 to the Republican Party and attended a luncheon attended by President George H.W. Bush and 1,400 mostly white Republicans. The rapper’s spokesman explained blithely that he was a “Bush fan.” White House officials, evidently embarrassed that a rapper whose lyrics glorified violence against police been invited to the event, declined comment.


Trying to position himself as a centrist in his first presidential campaign, Bill Clinton famously rebuked the rapper Sister Souljah for saying that blacks should kill whites instead of each other. Clinton’s comments posited him as a moderate and suggested that hip-hop and national politics were incompatible — at least then. Throughout George W. Bush’s presidency, the genre appeared as a footnote, and sometimes an ugly one, as when Kanye West accused Bush of being a racist during a Hurricane Katrina fundraising telethon.


Signs that the times they were a changin’ came in 2011, when the rapper Common — whose lyrics also dealt with violence against police — was invited to a White House poetry night. Although conservative media outlets criticized the invitation, they were unable to drum up widespread support for a boycott. Common attended without incident, and the furor died down.


Hip-hop now attracts a bipartisan clique of fans on Capitol Hill, in addition to its best-known booster in the White House.


Democratic Rep. André Carson of Indiana, a self-described former “battle rapper,” performed under the name Juggernaut into his early 20s. Though he gave up rap to pursue community activism and politics, Carson said that rapping helped him become a better communicator and public speaker.


Florida Republican Rep. Trey Radel describes himself as a “hip-hop conservative” in his Twitter biography. He tweeted his thoughts on Jay-Z’s newest album earlier this year and penned an essay for Buzzfeed about hip-hop.


Radel wrote that he found “a conservative message in [the Public Enemy protest anthem] ‘Fight the Power’ because I believe when government expands it becomes a political tool meant to oppress.” The first-term congressman acknowledged that he has philosophical disagreements with many of his favorite rappers. But that’s not a phenomenon limited to hip-hop, as attested by the unrequited crush Republican Gov. Chris Christie has on fellow Jersey guy — and decidedly liberal — rock star Bruce Springsteen.


Sen. Marco Rubio has also publicly discussed his appreciation for hip-hop in several interviews, telling GQ his favorite rap songs are “Straight Outta Compton” by N.W.A., “Killuminati” by Tupac, and “Lose Yourself” by Eminem.


A Rubio spokesman, asked earlier this year if the Florida Republican was concerned about political backlash over being a fan of such controversial musicians, told RealClearPolitics, “The short answer is no.”


But some conservatives’ embrace of the genre has piqued some liberal critics, who call the rush toward publicly celebrating hip-hop pandering. Alan Pike, writing for ThinkProgress earlier this year, accused Rubio of hypocrisy: “If you’re milking hip-hop for credibility while marginalizing its challenges to the kinds of policies and narratives that Republicans run on, you might need to test your listening comprehension, period.”


Some Buzzfeed readers harshly responded on Radel’s essay, commenting, “Nobody cares” and “Does he listen to rap music that isn’t 20 years old?”


Radel, who mentioned that he has recently been listening to relative newcomer Kendrick Lamar, told RCP that he see hip-hop as overwhelmingly anti-establishment more than explicitly conservative or liberal.


Democrat Carson, asked if considers it disingenuous for conservative politicians to embrace the music form, offered a blanket defense of Republicans: “I think music is music. You can’t say it’s hypocritical for a member of the Black Caucus to embrace polka.”


He also expects hip-hop, as it grows as an art form and increases its market share, to become even more culturally and politically acceptable as time goes on.


“I think society has changed,” he said. “… [Politicians] were concerned about what they considered to be urban-centric music infiltrating their homes and having an impact on their kids. Now it’s become so universal, it’s a part of everyday life.”


RNC Deputy Press Secretary Raffi Williams concurred, suggesting another reason Republicans might want to listen to hip-hop: its popularity. They appreciate it “just like a lot of their constituents” do.


Radel agrees. His constituents “are excited to see someone, a Republican especially, attempt to talk to people across generational, ethnic and cultural lines,” he said.


Although hip-hop has gained wider acceptance, politicians must be careful of exactly which songs — and which artists — they embrace. The rise of Kanye in the early 2000s paved the way for rappers without violent backgrounds. Gang affiliation, or a history dealing drugs, is no longer a prerequisite for respect. Still, the genre’s rougher edges remain.


Lil Wayne made an art form out of creatively describing new ways to disrespect women and abuse drugs. Kanye protégé Pusha T nihilistically compares his time in “the rap game” to his former career as a cocaine dealer. Just last week, Eminem released a song that immediately drew scrutiny over its blatantly homophobic lyrics.


Asked about the more violent aspects of hip-hop, Radel said, “These are lyrics that I think are terrible and have no place in society.” He added, however, that controversial lyrics represent greater problems.


“All music is a reflection of that time, that era. While I do recognize some of the violence, I recognize the reality of hip-hop,” he said, noting that listening to N.W.A. for the first time exposed him to things “that I never knew existed.”


He’s not the only politician to embrace hip-hop with caveats. In the same BET interview that Obama praised “American Gangster,” the future president also delivered what would become the boilerplate political line on the music: “Honestly, I love the art of hip-hop. I don’t always love the message of hip-hop.” 




RealClearPolitics – Articles



Hip-Hop Gaining Bipartisan Embrace From Pols

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Weekly Address: Strengthening our Economy by Passing Bipartisan Immigration Reform


WASHINGTON, DC— In this week’s address, President Obama said that two weeks ago, a large bipartisan majority in the Senate voted to pass commonsense immigration reform, which would add a big boost to our economy, strengthen Social Security, and modernize our legal immigration system to make it more consistent with our values.  The President urges Congress to quickly take action to fix our broken immigration system and keep America strong for years to come.


The audio of the address and video of the address will be available online at www.whitehouse.gov at 6:00 a.m. ET, July 13, 2013.


Remarks of President Barack Obama
Weekly Address
The White House
July 13, 2013


Hi, everybody.  Two weeks ago, a large bipartisan majority of Senators voted to pass commonsense, comprehensive immigration reform – taking an important step towards fixing our broken immigration system once and for all.


This bill was a compromise, and neither side got everything they wanted.  But it was largely consistent with the key principles of commonsense reform that most of us in both parties have repeatedly laid out.  If passed, the Senate’s plan would build on the historic gains we’ve made in border security over the past four years with the most aggressive border security plan in our history.  It would offer a pathway to earned citizenship for the 11 million people who are in this country illegally – a pathway that includes paying penalties, learning English, and going to the end of the line behind everyone trying to come here legally.  And it would modernize our legal immigration system to make it more consistent with our values.


The Senate’s plan would also provide a big boost to our recovery.  And on Wednesday, we released a report detailing exactly how big a boost that would be. 


The report is based on the findings of independent, nonpartisan economists and experts who concluded that, if the Senate’s plan becomes law, our economy will be 5% larger in two decades compared to the status quo.  That’s $ 1.4 trillion added to our economy just by fixing our immigration system.


Here in America, we’ve always been a nation of immigrants.  That’s what’s kept our workforce dynamic, our businesses on the cutting edge, and our economy the strongest in the world.   But under the current system, too many smart, hardworking immigrants are prevented from contributing to that success.


Immigration reform would make it easier for highly-skilled immigrants and those who study at our colleges and universities to start businesses and create jobs right here in America.   Foreign companies would be more likely to invest here.  The demand for goods and services would go up – creating more jobs for American workers.  Every worker and business would be required to pay their fair share in taxes, reducing our deficit by nearly $ 850 billion over the next two decades.  And since a large portion of those taxes go towards retirement programs that millions of Americans depend on, Social Security would actually get stronger over the long-term – adding two years to the life of the program’s trust fund.


That’s what immigration reform would mean for our economy – but only if we act.  If we don’t do anything to fix our broken system, our workforce will continue to shrink as baby boomers retire.  We won’t benefit from highly-skilled immigrants starting businesses and creating jobs here.  American workers will have to make due with lower wages and fewer protections.  And without more immigrants and businesses paying their fair share in taxes, our deficit will be higher and programs like Social Security will be under more strain.


We’ve been debating this issue for more than a decade – ever since President Bush first proposed the broad outlines of immigration reform – and I think he gave a very good speech this past week expressing his hope that a bipartisan, comprehensive bill can become law. 


If Democrats and Republicans – including President Bush and I – can agree on something, that’s a pretty good place to start.  Now the House needs to act so I can sign commonsense immigration reform into law.  And if you agree, tell your Representatives that now is the time.  Call or email or post on their Facebook walls and ask them to get this done.  Because together, we can grow our economy and keep America strong for years to come.


Thanks, and have a great weekend.


###


Close Transcript




President Obama’s Weekly Address



Weekly Address: Strengthening our Economy by Passing Bipartisan Immigration Reform

Monday, March 11, 2013

VIDEO: Congress News - WASHINGTON, Leon Panetta, Barack Obama

Congress urged to pass vote changes for IMFDistinguished Warfare Medal Honoring Drone Pilots Faces Bipartisan BacklashLawmakers: Obama wooing might break budget logjamObama eases export controls on some military spare parts

Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.


To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.


VIDEO: Congress News - WASHINGTON, Leon Panetta, Barack Obama