Showing posts with label cheap. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cheap. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Warren Buffett plugs cheap Vanguard trackers in latest investor letter

Warren Buffett plugs cheap Vanguard trackers in latest investor letter
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/03/04/article-2573007-09631A81000005DC-889_634x441.jpg


By Tanya Jefferies


|


Billionaire investor Warren Buffett has just delivered the latest of his popular letters to shareholders in his firm Berkshire Hathaway – and this year he is full of praise for cheap tracker funds.


Warning against active investing and trying to ‘pick winners’, Buffett tells non-professional investors their aim should be to own a cross-section of businesses that together are bound to do well and ‘a low-cost S&P 500 index fund will achieve this goal’.


Buffett recommends a very simple portfolio split between shares and government bonds which he believes will beat long-term returns made by most investors – pension funds, institutions or individuals – who use ‘high-fee managers’.


Laying on entertainment: Warren Buffett plays the ukulele and sings with the Quebe Sisters Band at an annual shareholders meeting of Berkshire Hathaway in Omaha, Nebraska

Laying on entertainment: Warren Buffett plays the ukulele and sings with the Quebe Sisters Band at an annual shareholders meeting of Berkshire Hathaway in Omaha, Nebraska



‘My money, I should add, is where my mouth is,’ he says, before describing the investing instructions left in his will for a trust bequeathed to his wife.


‘My advice to the trustee could not be more simple: Put 10 per cent of the cash in short-term government bonds and 90 per cent in a very low-cost S&P 500 index fund. (I suggest Vanguard’s.)’


Buffett has informed and entertained investors with annual letters since the 1960s – go here to read those going back to 1977 and check below for some more nuggets from the latest, including about his mistakes and how often to check stock prices.


The latest Berkshire Hathaway results reveal it made £11.6billion last year, up from £8.8billion the year before.


But growth of 18.2 per cent in the company’s book value – its assets minus liabilities – lagged the 32.4 per cent rise in the US’s S&P 500 share index with dividends included last year.


It also emerged that Buffett has cut his stake in struggling UK supermarket Tesco from 5.2 per cent to 3.7 per cent, though it remains among his biggest holdings alongside the likes of Coca-Cola and Goldman Sachs.


 
TiM iPhone puff


After Tesco’s shock profit warning in January 2012, Buffett took the opportunity to increase his stake. However, he seems to be having second thoughts and started selling some of his shares last autumn.


Read more here about Buffett’s investment in Tesco, and how British investing guru Neil Woodford looks to have made a better call by offloading his stake straight after the profit alert.


What does Warren Buffett say about…?


Outperforming the S&P 500 index


Over the stock market cycle between year ends 2007 and 2013, we overperformed the S&P. Through full cycles in future years, we expect to do that again. If we fail to do so, we will not have earned our pay. After all, you could always own an index fund and be assured of S&P results.


Berkshire’s biggest purchases in 2013, HJ Heinz and NV Energy


Both companies fit us well and will be prospering a century from now.


With Heinz, Berkshire now owns eight and a half companies that, were they stand-alone businesses, would be in the Fortune 500. Only 491 and a half to go.


Owning part-stakes in companies


Long-term success: Buffett reckons Heinz will still be prospering a century from now

Long-term success: Buffett reckons Heinz will still be prospering a century from now



At Berkshire, we much prefer owning a non-controlling but substantial portion of a wonderful company to owning 100 per cent of a so-so business; it’s better to have a partial interest in the Hope diamond than to own all of a rhinestone


Belief in America


Our subsidiaries spent a record $ 11billion on plant and equipment during 2013, roughly twice our depreciation charge. About 89 per cent of that money was spent in the United States. Though we invest abroad as well, the mother lode of opportunity resides in America.


Charlie [Munger, his business partner] and I have always considered a “bet” on ever-rising US prosperity to be very close to a sure thing. Indeed, who has ever benefited during the past 237 years by betting against America? If you compare our country’s present condition to that existing in 1776, you have to rub your eyes in wonder. And the dynamism embedded in our market economy will continue to work its magic. America’s best days lie ahead..


Car insurer GEICO


GEICO in 1996 ranked number seven among US auto insurers. Now, GEICO is number two, having recently passed Allstate. The reasons for this amazing growth are simple: low prices and reliable service. You can do yourself a favor by calling 1-800-847-7536 or checking Geico.com to see if you, too, can cut your insurance costs.



STILL A PAPERBOY AT HEART…



Buffett gives details of an unusual Berkshire Hathaway tradition – newspaper throwing.


Arrangements for Berkshire’s annual meeting on Saturday May 3 2014


CenturyLink’s doors will open at 7am, and at 7.30 we will have our third International Newspaper Tossing Challenge. Our target will be a Clayton Home porch, precisely 35 feet from the throwing line. I tossed about 500,000 papers when I was a teenager, so I think I’m pretty good.


Challenge me: I’ll buy a Dilly Bar for anyone who lands his or her throw closer to the doorstep than I do. The papers will be 36 to 42 pages, and you must fold them yourself (no rubber bands allowed).




No one likes to buy auto insurance. But almost everyone likes to drive. The insurance needed is a major expenditure for most families. Savings matter to them – and only a low-cost operation can deliver these. GEICO’s cost advantage is the factor that has enabled the company to gobble up market share year after year. Its low costs create a moat – an IIII enduring one – that competitors are unable to cross.


Making mistakes


The crowd of companies in this section sells products ranging from lollipops to jet airplanes. Some of these businesses, measured by earnings on unleveraged net tangible assets, enjoy terrific economics, producing profits that run from 25 per cent after-tax to far more than 100 per cent. Others generate good returns in the area of 12 per cent to 20 per cent.


A few, however, have very poor returns, a result of some serious mistakes I made in my job of capital allocation. I was not misled: I simply was wrong in my evaluation of the economic dynamics of the company or the industry in which it operated.


Fortunately, my blunders usually involved relatively small acquisitions. Our large buys have generally worked out well and, in a few cases, more than well. I have not, however, made my last mistake in purchasing either businesses or stocks. Not everything works out as planned.


The fundamentals of investing


Focus on the future productivity of the asset you are considering. If you don’t feel comfortable making a rough estimate of the asset’s future earnings, just forget it and move on. No one has the ability to evaluate every investment possibility. But omniscience isn’t necessary; you only need to understand the actions you undertake.


Second thoughts? Buffett has cut his stake in struggling UK supermarket Tesco from 5.2 per cent to 3.7 per cent

Second thoughts? Buffett has cut his stake in struggling UK supermarket Tesco from 5.2 per cent to 3.7 per cent



If you instead focus on the prospective price change of a contemplated purchase, you are speculating. There is nothing improper about that.


I know, however, that I am unable to speculate successfully, and I am skeptical of those who claim sustained success at doing so. Half of all coin-flippers will win their first toss; none of those winners has an expectation of profit if he continues to play the game. And the fact that a given asset has appreciated in the recent past is never a reason to buy it.


Games are won by players who focus on the playing field – not by those whose eyes are glued to the scoreboard. If you can enjoy Saturdays and Sundays without looking at stock prices, give it a try on weekdays.


Being realistic


The unsophisticated investor who is realistic about his shortcomings is likely to obtain better long term results than the knowledgeable professional who is blind to even a single weakness.


Active investing


Both individuals and institutions will constantly be urged to be active by those who profit from giving advice or effecting transactions. The resulting frictional costs can be huge and, for investors in aggregate, devoid of benefit. So ignore the chatter, keep your costs minimal, and invest in stocks as you would in a farm.


The benefits of cheap tracker funds


The goal of the non-professional should not be to pick winners – neither he nor his “helpers” can do that – but should rather be to own a cross-section of businesses that in aggregate are bound to do well. A low-cost S&P 500 index fund will achieve this goal.


Investing instructions laid out in his will


One bequest provides that cash will be delivered to a trustee for my wife’s benefit. (I have to use cash for individual bequests, because all of my Berkshire shares will be fully distributed to certain philanthropic organizations over the 10 years following the closing of my estate.)


My advice to the trustee could not be more simple: Put 10 per cent of the cash in short-term government bonds and 90 per cent in a very low-cost S&P 500 index fund. (I suggest Vanguard’s.) I believe the trust’s long-term results from this policy will be superior to those attained by most investors – whether pension funds, institutions or individuals – who employ high-fee managers.


Home of Warren Buffett: Modest dwelling place of the billionaire in Omaha, Nebraska

Home of Warren Buffett: Modest dwelling place of the billionaire in Omaha, Nebraska



Benjamin Graham’s book The Intelligent Investor, which he bought in 1949


I can’t remember what I paid for that first copy of The Intelligent Investor. Whatever the cost, it would underscore the truth of Ben’s adage: Price is what you pay, value is what you get. Of all the investments I ever made, buying Ben’s book was the best (except for my purchase of two marriage licenses).







Money | Mail Online




Read more about Warren Buffett plugs cheap Vanguard trackers in latest investor letter and other interesting subjects concerning Business at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Friday, November 22, 2013

Exclusive: Euro zone mulls cheap loans as incentive for economic reforms -document

Exclusive: Euro zone mulls cheap loans as incentive for economic reforms -document
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/4202a__?m=02&d=20131122&t=2&i=814181485&w=460&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=CBRE9AL165U00.jpg




BRUSSELS Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:10am EST



File picture shows European Union member states

File picture shows European Union member states’ flags flying in front of the building of the European Parliament in Strasbourg, April 21, 2004.


Credit: Reuters/Vincent Kessler/File




BRUSSELS (Reuters) – Euro zone governments are considering cheap loans to governments as an incentive to undertake structural reforms which pay off only in the medium-term, an EU document showed on Friday, introducing for the first time a discussion on fiscal transfers.


The document will form the basis of discussions of senior euro zone officials who will meet in Brussels on November 26 to prepare the next European Union summit on December 19-20.


The loans would be part of so-called contractual arrangements, which would be legally binding contracts with economic reform targets and macroeconomic milestones that trigger the payout of tranches of the agreed loan.


The loans would be attractive because they would carry an interest rate lower than the one a government could get on the market. In that respect, it would amount to a degree of subsidized lending, ultimately amounting to a mutualizing of risk among involved member states and a degree of financial transfer – an idea that Germany has long resisted.


“Loans would imply only limited fiscal transfers across countries,” said the 9-page document, obtained by Reuters.


“Indeed, the transfer element would be limited to a lower interest rate than the market rate of most beneficiary Member States, capturing the positive externality of the reforms for the EU as a whole,” it said.


To qualify, countries would have to draw up legally binding plans for reforms that would then be approved by other euro zone states. The conditionality would come on top of other macroeconomic programs such as the Stability and Growth Pact and the eurozone’s new budgetary oversight powers.


The size of the loan would not be linked to the cost of reform and would be meant as general support for the economy. It is not clear what time-frame the loans would be offered for, or what the limit on the size of any loan would be.


“The specific amount of financing would not be linked to the direct cost of reforms, which generally is difficult to measure,” the document said.


“Financial support should be conceived as an incentive or as general support to the overall economy rather than as a compensation for the specific cost of reforms as such, as well as a broader signal of European support to the economic reform agenda of each Member State,” the document said.


The loans would not be available to countries running excessive macroeconomic imbalances or currently under a bailout. However, an official briefed on the document said a country like Ireland, which is about to exit a program, could, for example, request a contract and if approved, benefit from the cheap loans.


The document did not specify how exactly the loans could be financed, mentioning only a European Commission idea from March that it could be either through direct contributions from governments or through designating a new revenue source.


One possibility, the official indicated, might be for the euro zone’s rescue fund, the European Stability Mechanism, to raise money on international markets and on-lend capital to a contracted member state, although the exact framework and process of the lending is yet to be finalized.


(Reporting By Luke Baker and Martin Santa)






Reuters: Business News




Read more about Exclusive: Euro zone mulls cheap loans as incentive for economic reforms -document and other interesting subjects concerning Business at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Insight: The poison pill in India"s search for cheap food




A farmer sprays pesticide containing monocrotophos on a paddy field at Mohanpur village, about 45 km (28 miles) west of Agartala, capital of India


1 of 2. A farmer sprays pesticide containing monocrotophos on a paddy field at Mohanpur village, about 45 km (28 miles) west of Agartala, capital of India’s northeastern state of Tripura July 25, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Jayanta Dey






MUMBAI/NEW DELHI | Sun Jul 28, 2013 1:35am EDT



MUMBAI/NEW DELHI (Reuters) – Nearly a decade ago, the Indian government ruled out a ban on the production and use of monocrotophos, the highly toxic pesticide that killed 23 children this month in a village school providing free lunches under a government-sponsored program.


Despite being labeled highly hazardous by the World Health Organization (WHO), a panel of government experts was persuaded by manufacturers that monocrotophos was cheaper than alternatives and more effective in controlling pests that decimate crop output.


India, which has more hungry mouths to feed than any other country in the world, continues to use monocrotophos and other highly toxic pesticides that rich and poor nations alike, including China, are banning on health grounds.


Although the government argues the benefits of strong pesticides outweigh the hazards if properly managed, the school food poisoning tragedy underlined criticism such controls are virtually ignored on the ground.


According to the minutes, the 2004 meeting conducted by the Central Insecticides Board and Registration Committee, the Indian government body that regulates pesticide use, concluded that: “The data submitted by the industry satisfies the concerns raised…Therefore, there is no need to recommend the ban of this product.”


The minutes of the meeting can be read here: cibrc.nic.in/248rc.doc


Government scientists continue to defend the pesticide, and insist the decision to not ban it remains good.


Just weeks before the school tragedy in Bihar state, the Indian government advised farmers via text message to use monocrotophos to kill borer pests in mandarin fruits and rice, records on the agricultural meteorology division’s web site show.


“It is cost effective and it is known for its efficacy … some even call it a benevolent pesticide,” said T. P. Rajendran, assistant director general for plant protection at the Indian Council of Agricultural Research.


“I can say that pesticides currently permitted in the country are safe provided they are used as per specifications and guidelines. We have exhaustive and detailed guidelines. They need to be followed.”


A senior official directly involved in the decision-making on pesticide use said: “You have got to understand that all pesticides are toxic but they are essential for maintaining or increasing agricultural production.


“Can we afford to lose 15-25 percent of output? One cannot afford to lose such a large percentage of agricultural produce. The answer lies in judicious use.”


The official declined to be identified.


The WHO has cited a 2007 study that about 76,000 people die each year in India from pesticide poisoning. Many of the deaths are suicides made easy by the wide availability of toxic pesticides.


15 PAGES OF REGULATIONS


In the school tragedy, police suspect the children’s lunch was cooked in oil that was stored in a used container of monocrotophos.


The Indian government has issued 15 pages of regulations that need to be followed when handling pesticides – including wearing protective clothing and using a respirator when spraying. Pesticide containers should be broken when empty and not left outside in order to prevent them being re-used.


But in a nation where a quarter of the 1.2 billion population is illiterate and vast numbers live in far-flung rural districts, implementation is almost impossible. For instance, monocrotophos is banned for use on vegetable crops, but there is no way to ensure the rule is followed.


According to the WHO, swallowing 1,200 milligrams – less than a teaspoon – of monocrotophos can be fatal to humans. In 2009, it called for India to ban the product because of its extreme toxicity.


“It is imperative to consider banning the use of monocrotophos,” it said in a 60-page report. “The perception that monocrotophos is cheap and necessary, have prevented the product from being taken off the market” in India.


WHO officials say the school tragedy reinforces the dangers of the pesticide.


“We would advocate that countries restrict, ban, or phase out…those chemicals for which they can’t ensure that all aspects of use are safe,” said Lesley Onyon, WHO’s South-East Asia regional adviser for chemical safety. “If they can’t ensure safety, it’s our policy to say that these chemical or pesticides shouldn’t be used.”


Indian government officials refuse to address the WHO’s findings directly.


“We have to take decisions depending on our need, our priorities, and our requirements. No one knows these things better than us,” said the government source.


NATIONAL PRIORITY


For India, providing more food to its people is a national priority. According to the World Bank, nearly 400 million people in the country live on less than $ 1.25 per day.


Nearly half its children under five are malnourished.


The Bihar school where the children died was participating in the government’s midday meal program, aimed at giving 120 million school pupils a free lunch – both providing nutrition and encouraging education. India is also close to implementing an ambitious plan to provide cheap food to 800 million people.


Central to these efforts will be higher crop yields and managing costs.


According to government officials and manufacturers, monocrotophos is cheap and is also a broad spectrum pesticide that can only be replaced by four or five crop- or pest-specific pesticides. Even similar pesticides are much more expensive.


A 500 ml monocrotophos bottle sold by Godrej Agrovet, a subsidiary of Godrej Industries, is priced at 225 rupees ($ 3.75), while an alternative, Imidacloprid, in a bottle of 500 ml produced by Bayer, costs 1,271 rupees.


Monocrotophos is banned by many countries, including the United States, the European Union nations, China, and, among India’s neighbors, Pakistan. Sri Lanka only allows monocrotophos use for coconut cultivation.


One of the two companies that argued against the ban on monocrotophos in 2004 halted production five years later under pressure from the public in its home country, Denmark.


Cheminova, a unit of Auriga Industries, said it stopped producing monocrotophos in India in 2009 and converted its plant to produce a low-toxic fungicide.


“We decided to phase out monocrotophos because with many alternative products, we could not see any reason to have such a toxic product in a country like India,” Lars-Erik Pedersen, vice-president of Auriga Industries, told Reuters in Copenhagen.


“It was a big decision because it is one of the best-selling products in India,” he added.


The other manufacturer that made a presentation at the 2004 meeting was United Phosphorus, currently the biggest producer of the pesticide in the country.


Managing Director Rajju D. Shroff told Reuters that monocrotophos was “very harmless,” and hinted calls for a ban were aimed at helping multinationals sell more costly alternatives.


“Companies want to sell new pesticides. If they have monocrotophos, farmers will not change to new, expensive ones,” said Shroff, who attended the meeting as the head of the Crop Care Federation of India, a position he still holds.


NOT MOST TOXIC


Historically, India appears reluctant to ban pesticides. Monocrotophos isn’t the most toxic pesticide used in the country, according to the WHO’s classifications. Phorate, methyl parathion, bromadiolone and phosphamidon, all classified as extremely hazardous, are likewise registered for use.


And endosulfan – a substance so nasty the United Nations wants it eliminated worldwide – was banned only by a Supreme Court order in 2011. The decision came a few months after the chief minister of the southern state of Kerala, the top elected official, went on a day-long hunger fast to demand the ban.


According to media reports, over 1,000 people were killed and hundreds born deformed because of indiscriminate aerial spraying of endosulfan in Kasargod, a Kerala district.


Both production of monocrotophos and demand in India was higher in 2009/10 than in 2005/06, according to latest available government data. It accounted for about 4 percent of total pesticide use in 2009/10 and 7 percent of production.


Its share in total sales is about 2-3 percent now, according to the Pesticides Manufacturers & Formulators Association, which says it represents the industry on a national basis with over 250 members.


The Centre for Science and Environment, a leading environmental NGO in India, says the state of pesticide control in the country is deplorable and companies have great influence.


“The story on the ground is abysmal, it’s very disappointing,” said Amit Khurana, program manager in the CSE’s food safety and toxins unit.


“People still do not know how much of pesticide is to be used, which pesticide is to be used for which crop. The biggest influence for a farmer is the sales representative of the company … so there’s this sense of gross mismanagement at that level.”


The government has tried to introduce legislation for “more effective regulation of import, manufacture, export, sale, transport, distribution and use of pesticides” but the bill has languished in parliament since 2008.


India is no stranger to the dangers of pesticides. Besides the thousands killed each year, the country suffered the world’s worst industrial disaster when lethal methyl isocyanate gas leaked from a pesticide plant in the city of Bhopal in 1984, killing nearly 4,500 people.


But in the fields of rural India, pesticides like monocrotophos continue to be widely used.


“I have been using it for the last 10 years, I have a very good experience,” said Gaiyabhu Patil, a 56-year-old farmer who has just finished spraying monocrotophos on his 15-acre cotton crop in the western state of Maharashtra. “It is cheap and effective.”


Anil Dhole, a pesticide vendor in Koregaon, a district town southeast of Mumbai at the center of a sugarcane and cotton growing region, said few of his customers took health warnings seriously.


“Many farmers don’t take the necessary precautions while applying the pesticide. We do inform them about its toxic nature, but they take it casually,” he said “Farmers don’t even bother to cover their noses.”


($ 1 = 59.5650 Indian rupees)


(Additional reporting by Annie Bannerji and Mayank Bhardwaj in NEW DELHI, Kate Kelland in LONDON, Ole Mikkelsen in COPENHAGEN, Catherine Hornby in ROME and Rujun Shen in SINGAPORE; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)





Reuters: Most Read Articles



Insight: The poison pill in India"s search for cheap food