Showing posts with label enforcement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label enforcement. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Law Enforcement Training Makes 2nd Amendment Advocates “Domestic Terrorists”



Print Friendly and PDF


Screen Shot 2014-02-18 at 12.27.00 PM


It took over a year to get officials to admit it, but finally, through FOI requests, they can no longer hide it.
Documents from the Ohio National Guard prove that 2nd Amendment supporters with “anti-government” opinions were portrayed as domestic terrorists in a disaster drill. Expect much more of this to come.


On January 18, 2013, WSAZ (NBC Huntingon/Charleston, WV) reported that Scioto County, OH held a mock disaster drill
in conjunction with Scioto County first responders and the Ohio Army National Guard 52nd Civil Support Unit.
The mock “ENEMY”? Two school employees who were disgruntled over the government’s interpretation of the Second Amendment.


The Ohio National Guard 52nd Civil Support Team training scenario involved a plot from local school district employees to use biological weapons in order to advance their beliefs about “protecting Gun Rights and Second Amendment rights.”


Portsmouth Chief of Police Bill Raisin told NBC 3 WSAZ-TV in Huntington, West Virginia that the drill accurately represented “the reality of the world we live in,” adding that such training “helps us all be prepared.”


Internal ONG documents provided to Media Trackers after repeated delays provide further context to what WSAZ-TV reported last winter.


In the disaster-preparedness scenario, two Portsmouth Junior High School employees poisoned school lunches with mustard gas, acting on orders from white-nationalist leader William Pierce.


The ONG team discovered biological weapons being produced in the school, requiring activation of containment and decontamination procedures.


Participants in the disaster drill located documents expressing the school employees’ “anti-government” sentiments, as well as a note identifying Pierce as the fictional right-wing terrorists’ leader.


According to that report, the first responders who handled the mock emergency took special note of what appeared in the classroom of a school that was searched during the exercise.


“On the chalkboard as well as the tables there were several statements about protecting Gun Rights and Second Amendment rights,” the summary read.


…Although it’s not referenced specifically in the incident summary report, the 38 pages of documents obtained by MediaTrackers also includes a 2011 article pertaining to gun control that’s on file alongside other evidence obtained from the school, including the name and phone number purportedly belonging to William Pierce, a now-deceased notorious neo-Nazi.


The 2011 article contained among the released documents is a CNN piece entitled “Why the NRA won’t talk gun control with Obama.”


Click here to download the documents obtained and released by MediaTrackers.org.


The MediaTrackers article notes that when ONG’s 52nd Civil Support Unit participated in a similar drill involving left-wing terrorists with Athens County first responders late last year, public officials apologized the next day in response to complaints from local environmentalist groups.


The mea culpa, released in December 2013 by Athens County officials, said “the scenario caused distress to people who have spent countless hours striving to protect the environment and our citizens.”


Thus far, no apology has been issued in this case involving Second Amendment supporters.


Scioto County Emergency Management Agency director Kim Carver refused to comment, telling Media Trackers she was “not going to get into an Ohio Army National Guard issue that you have with them.”


Ohio National Guard Communications Director James Sims II suggested Media Trackers was “inferring” from the ONG document’s contents as opposed to “what’s actually in the report.”


After excerpts of the report were read to him, Sims said it was “not relevant” to understand why conservatives may feel unduly targeted by ONG’s training scenario.


“Okay, I’m gonna stop ya there. I’m going to quit this conversation,” Sims concluded. “You have a good day.”


“The revelation of this information is appalling to me, and to all citizens of Ohio who are true conservatives and patriots, who don’t have guns for any other reason than that the Second Amendment gives them that right,” Portage County TEA Party Executive Director Tom Zawistowski said in a separate Media Trackers interview.


Zawistowski has sent a letter to Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan demanding an immediate investigation into what he calls “an even more onerous type of targeting” by the federal government.


Since the article was published, it has received international attention thanks to a link from DrudgeReport.com that as of 7:00 a.m. February 12 is entering its third day of being highlighted on that site.


Last evening (February 11, 2014), a statement was posted at the official website of the Ohio National Guard:


“In January 2013, Ohio National Guard 52nd Civil Support Team members participated in a one-day training exercise in Portsmouth that was created and run by the West Virginia National Guard. The exercise — one of more than 20 the Team did last year — was designed to test team members’ ability to respond to an unknown chemical, biological, radiological or high-yield explosive incident. To maximize the realism of the exercise, the Ohio National Guard wasn’t involved in the creation or execution of the exercise’s fictitious scenario and was deliberately not informed of its details in advance. It’s not accurate to suggest that certain details of the exercise somehow reflect views or opinions of officials of the Ohio National Guard.”


In the Athens County incident last year, it was similarly noted that the scenario was not created by the ONG. In speaking of that scenario, which involved a left-wing anti-fracking extremist group, Athens Co. Commissioner President Lenny Eliason observed that “you want to have it as realistic as possible, but you don’t want to single out an issue as emotional as that.”


Indeed.


Critics say it is telling that a government group’s chosen bogeyman would be Second Amendment supporters.


“They were characterizing gun owners and Second Amendment supporters as white extremists,” Chad Baus, of the Buckeye Firearms Association, told FoxNews.com. “It was a month after Sandy Hook. There was a large debate where gun owners were being blamed. I think the timing of it was extremely important here.”


Print Friendly and PDF


Posting Policy


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.



Jan Morgan Media



Law Enforcement Training Makes 2nd Amendment Advocates “Domestic Terrorists”

Monday, January 27, 2014

Missouri Set to Arrest Feds Over Gun Control Enforcement



Print Friendly and PDF


1525188_10151969741589440_173739061_n


Minimize the power of the federal government and use the sovereign power of the states and state’s rights. This is how Americans will restore our Constitutional Republic.
What Missouri lawmakers are working on today is a perfect example.


A Missouri Senate panel is taking up legislation that would send federal agents to jail for enforcing federal gun control laws in the state.


The measure being heard by the Senate General Laws Committee today would declare certain federal gun control policies “null and void.” Agents enforcing them could spend a year in jail, be fined up to $ 1,000 and face other civil penalties.


The bill would also allow designated school personnel to carry concealed weapons in buildings. Another provision would let holders of concealed gun permits carry firearms openly, even in municipalities with ordinances banning open carry.


The legislation is sponsored by Republican Sen. Brian Nieves, of Washington. A similar bill passed the Republican-led Legislature last year, but was vetoed by Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon.


Read more at WBIW TV


Print Friendly and PDF


Posting Policy


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.



Jan Morgan Media



Missouri Set to Arrest Feds Over Gun Control Enforcement

Saturday, December 28, 2013

Mission Creep in Law Enforcement: Expanding Federal Fiefdoms


Law enforcement catching a child rapist? Good work. Federal authorities equipped to catch a man who made child porn on his phone? Awesome. Enter mission creep.


It is difficult to have a problem with federal authorities apprehending a grown man who recorded himself engaging in sex acts with a six-year-old and a ten-year-old — and this is exactly how the mission creep of federal agencies begins. When an agency intended to have authority in one area begins to do something noble in an entirely different area of law enforcement, critics come across as monsters for making an issue of the expansion of the particular agency involved. 


A recent case involving the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE) provides and excellent example of such expansions. ICE, charged with immigration and customs enforcement, has a division named ICE HSI, Immigration and Customs Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations. The redundant division in the agency engaged in an investigative effort that previously would have been under the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). They took on a case involving a child predator inside the U.S. who made videos of himself engaging in sex acts with children in Louisiana.


The agency issued a December 16, 2013 call for the public’s help in identifying and capturing “John Doe” after videos surfaced with geo-tags indicating the videos were made in a specific area of Louisiana. The images were distributed to local law enforcement, and an arrest warrant was issued for “John Doe” in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. The effort worked, and the then-unknown suspect is now in custody.


The videos surfaced in Canada, and authorities there discovered two videos with embedded GPS coordinates revealing that they were made in Jonesboro, Louisiana on February 29, 2012 and March 2, 2012. The FBI was not brought in to lead the investigation because the videos were found in a foreign nation. With no indication that the Louisiana predator filmmaker traveled across international boundaries with his videos, ICE HSI took the investigation.


Why didn’t ICE inform the FBI of the matter and work with FBI special agents to arrest the predator in the United States? Why do two separate federal agencies have special agents doing the exact same jobs? The issue likely has to do with the need of fiefdoms and bureaucracies to perpetuate themselves and stay relevant.


Read More…



BlackListedNews.com



Mission Creep in Law Enforcement: Expanding Federal Fiefdoms

Mission Creep in Law Enforcement: Expanding Federal Fiefdoms


Law enforcement catching a child rapist? Good work. Federal authorities equipped to catch a man who made child porn on his phone? Awesome. Enter mission creep.


It is difficult to have a problem with federal authorities apprehending a grown man who recorded himself engaging in sex acts with a six-year-old and a ten-year-old — and this is exactly how the mission creep of federal agencies begins. When an agency intended to have authority in one area begins to do something noble in an entirely different area of law enforcement, critics come across as monsters for making an issue of the expansion of the particular agency involved. 


A recent case involving the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE) provides and excellent example of such expansions. ICE, charged with immigration and customs enforcement, has a division named ICE HSI, Immigration and Customs Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations. The redundant division in the agency engaged in an investigative effort that previously would have been under the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). They took on a case involving a child predator inside the U.S. who made videos of himself engaging in sex acts with children in Louisiana.


The agency issued a December 16, 2013 call for the public’s help in identifying and capturing “John Doe” after videos surfaced with geo-tags indicating the videos were made in a specific area of Louisiana. The images were distributed to local law enforcement, and an arrest warrant was issued for “John Doe” in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. The effort worked, and the then-unknown suspect is now in custody.


The videos surfaced in Canada, and authorities there discovered two videos with embedded GPS coordinates revealing that they were made in Jonesboro, Louisiana on February 29, 2012 and March 2, 2012. The FBI was not brought in to lead the investigation because the videos were found in a foreign nation. With no indication that the Louisiana predator filmmaker traveled across international boundaries with his videos, ICE HSI took the investigation.


Why didn’t ICE inform the FBI of the matter and work with FBI special agents to arrest the predator in the United States? Why do two separate federal agencies have special agents doing the exact same jobs? The issue likely has to do with the need of fiefdoms and bureaucracies to perpetuate themselves and stay relevant.


Read More…



BlackListedNews.com



Mission Creep in Law Enforcement: Expanding Federal Fiefdoms

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Obama’s IRS Nominee Promises to Restore Faith in Taxation Enforcement Agency


Obama and Senate work together to save government’s confiscatory agency


Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
December 10, 2013


Obama has selected John Koskinen to head up the scandal-ridden Internal Revenue Service. Koskinen, who warms a seat on the board of American Capital and has experience running a government soccer foundation, told the Senate Finance Committee today he will restore faith in the IRS.


“In every area of the IRS, taxpayers need to be confident that they will be treated fairly no matter what their backgrounds or their affiliations,” Koskinen said. “Public trust is the IRS’ most important and valuable asset.”


Acting IRS boss Danny Werfel gets grilled: Government desperate to get its major confiscatory agency out of the crosshairs.


Trust is not an asset for the IRS. Fear is. Most Americans dutifully submit bureaucratic paperwork on April 15 out of fear, not a sense of obligation or duty to government.


Since Obama was chosen to read a teleprompter and robosign legislation for the global elite, the IRS has been increasingly put to the test as a political weapon. It was used in the past by other presidents to persecute political opponents, but the agency was switched into overdrive after the appointment of Barry Obama, the CIA groomed front man for the ruling elite.


Due to partisan politics and revelations of over-the-top targeting of tea party organizations by the agency, acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller was forced to step down in May after the Treasury Inspector General for tax administration released an audit accusing the agency of illegally targeting political groups opposed to Obama. Obama’s handpicked temp, Danny Werfel, will step aside if Mr. Koskinen gets the nod.


It looks like Koskinen is a shoo-in. The chairman of the Finance Committee, Montana Senator Max Baucus, and Utah Senator Orrin Hatch, who is top dog on the committee, said they back the bankster minion Koskinen. It looks like he will be ushered in with no serious opposition and will rule the IRS for the next five years.


Koskinen said he will work with the committee to resolve any issues regarding the targeting of tea party and conservative groups, according to the Washington Times. Since Koskinen is an Obama political pick, however, it is not clear what sort of reform will occur at the agency.


This article was posted: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 at 12:24 pm









Infowars



Obama’s IRS Nominee Promises to Restore Faith in Taxation Enforcement Agency

Friday, December 6, 2013

Warrantless Cellphone ‘Tower Dumps’ Becoming Go-To Tool For Law Enforcement


from the just-get-it-all,-you-never-know-when-you’ll-need-it dept


Tim Cushing
Tech Dirt
December 6, 2013


Our founding fathers understood the problems with overly-broad warrants and the dangers posed by unreasonable searches and seizures. These were the sort of things kings did because the populace had no way to check that power. So, when they decided the US wouldn’t be run like a patriarchal state, they built in protections for the new nation’s inhabitants.


But they also understood that these checks on government power might be inconvenient for law enforcement and security agencies, which is why they built in extensive waivers and exceptions that would allow these entities to bypass the limits in order to pursue criminals, terrorists and whistleblowers. As the wording clearly states in the Bill of Rights, the people are guaranteed certain protections “unless, you know, we’re trying to catch bad guys.”


It’s true.** Our founding fathers would be amazed to observe the ruckus being raised by so-called “defenders” of rights in the wake of the NSA leaks or the rising amount of evidence showing government agencies are willing to exploit every loophole (mainly the Third Party Doctrine) to seize tons of data completely unrelated to the investigations at hand.


**It absolutely f**king isn’t.


Jess Remington at Reason points out another of these “non-events” being carried out under the name of law enforcement.


Police officers in Richland County, South Carolina are currently defending the use of a controversial investigation method that grants their departments access to thousands of cell phone users’ data in the search for criminals.


The technique, in which law enforcement officials rely on what are known as “tower dumps,” is an increasingly common policing tactic in local departments across the country. Following a crime, law enforcement officials locate nearby cell towers and request all of the call, text, and data transmissions that occurred during the crime from the tower’s provider. The majority of the data collected belongs to individuals with no connection to the crime.



How does one’s info end up being swept up in a tower dump? Does one have a cellphone with a signal? Yeah, that’s how. Checking your email? Surfing the web? Making a call? Sending a text message? It all goes in the dump. And South Carolina cops are helping themselves to all of this data because, hey, it makes capturing bad guys a little easier. (CAUTION: AUTOPLAY IN EFFECT)


The Richland County Sheriff’s Department used Tower Dumps during the investigation into a string of car breakins, where weapons and computers were stolen. They combined the Tower Dump information with DNA evidence and in 2011 arrested Phillip Tate on three counts of “breaking and entering a motor vehicle” and one count of “larceny.”


“He did break and enter into both of those vehicles, one of them being the vehicle of Sheriff Lott. It was parked at his house,” said Fifth Circuit Solicitor Joanna McDuffy in court. “It was his sheriff department issued vehicle. Weapons were taken from that vehicle your honor.”


Search warrants we found say Richland Sheriff’s investigators requested dumps on two cell phone towers during their investigation.



Cops seeking to use these tower dumps just can’t call up the provider and ask for them. But neither do they have to jump through the probable cause hoops a warrant entails. All they need is a court order, which is considerably easier to obtain than a warrant, thanks to the (somewhat ironically-named) Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986.


The Richland PD is just one of several law enforcement entities making frequent use of these untargeted, unminimized data dumps. And the numbers keep increasing every year.


In 2011, AT&T and Verizon received 1.3 million requests for cell phone data (many of which were tower dumps) and filled more than 500,000 of them. Verizon estimates that over the last 5 years, law enforcement’s tower dump requests have increased by 15% annually. T-Mobile reported increases of approximately 12%-16%.



Thanks to the ease of obtaining tower dumps, it’s becoming a go-to tool for law enforcement. Not only can they collect these without needing to show probable cause, they’re also under no obligation to inform any of the millions of unrelated cellphone customers whose information they’ve obtained that they’ve swept up their data.


Oddly enough, someone from the counterterrorism community is being the voice of reason in all this.


“In recognizing that it’s not just the CIA or FBI tracking a terrorist that may have flown over here, this is local law enforcement. As citizens, we sort of have a question: how often is this happening?” said Keith Pounds, president of counterrorism consulting firm Countercon…


He supports Tower Dumps, but only if a search warrant is signed, the data is purged after an investigation is complete and law enforcement notify subscribers included in the database.


“Inform us,” Pounds said. “Or at least those couple of hundred or couple of thousand people, innocent people, inform them that hey we acquired your information for this particular crime. We’re going to purge the data and get rid of it.”



This obviously isn’t being implemented anywhere at the moment, or we would have heard of it. Law enforcement agencies are understandably in no hurry to tell innocent citizens that they’re sweeping up their data in order to sift through it for potential signs of wrongdoing. They seem to be taking their cues from our nation’s intelligence agencies, which only begrudgingly inform the public about their data hauls, and then only after former employees splash them all over the front pages of newspapers.


Making this worse (especially for South Carolina residents) is that local laws regarding this data tie retention rates to whether the suspect apprehended using tower dumps is convicted or not.


South Carolina evidence control laws say if a suspect is convicted or pleads guilty, police could keep everything they get from a Tower Dump for up to seven years.



So, your data’s stay in SC police databases isn’t subject to any minimization by process of elimination. It isn’t even purged once a guilty verdict (or entered plea) is obtained. Instead, SC law enforcement has nearly a decade (or longer — no mention of what happens if the suspect is found not guilty) to play connect-the-dots with data on non-criminals.


Even worse, this is a state that at least has some sort of policy in place to deal with this data. Most states have very little in the way of guidelines or privacy protection. Usually, these are developed post-public uproar. And if no one has to inform the public about the gathering of their data, this delays the (almost inevitable) exposure of these practices and increases the chances of abuse.


This article was posted: Friday, December 6, 2013 at 11:55 am


Tags: big brother, domestic spying, nsa









Infowars



Warrantless Cellphone ‘Tower Dumps’ Becoming Go-To Tool For Law Enforcement

Saturday, August 3, 2013

McCain: We Might Drop Those 20,000 New Border Patrol Agents We Promised


Katie Pavlich
Town Hall.com
August 2, 2013


As the House of Representatives prepares to take up the issue of illegal immigration, the Senate is already prepping for conference negotiations with John McCain taking the lead.


It turns out, some of the most crucial aspects of border enforcement already passed by the Senate, including the addition of 20,000 new Border Patrol agents, are likely to be negotiated away, proving once again that the Gang of 8 was a complete sham.


Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) signaled Tuesday that the dramatic boost in border-security in the Senate’s comprehensive immigration bill could be one of the provisions that may be changed in a potential House-Senate compromise.


Read More


This article was posted: Friday, August 2, 2013 at 5:01 pm


Tags: economics, foreign affairs, government corruption










Infowars



McCain: We Might Drop Those 20,000 New Border Patrol Agents We Promised