Showing posts with label insurers'. Show all posts
Showing posts with label insurers'. Show all posts

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Insurers: We warned Obama


Kevin Lamarque / Reuters



President Barack Obama meets with health insurance executives at the White House on Friday.




By Lisa Myers, Senior Investigative Correspondent, NBC News


Several insurance industry officials and state insurance commissioners expressed frustration Friday, saying they were “baffled” by President Barack Obama’s assertion that the cancellation of millions of insurance policies occurred because a key provision of the Affordable Care Act didn’t work as expected. The administration was warned three years ago that regulations would have exactly that effect, they said. 


They said the widespread cancellations in the individual health insurance market — roughly 5 million and counting — are in line with what was projected under regulations drawn up by the administration in 2010, requirements that both insurers and businesses objected to at the time. Cancellations also are occurring in the small group market, which covers businesses with between two and 50 employees, they noted. 


“We have been saying for years that the requirements in the law were going to mean that people couldn’t keep their current plans and they were going to have to purchase coverage that was more expensive,” said one high-level heath industry insider who spoke on condition of anonymity. “We said these changes would disrupt coverage and increase premiums for consumers. And now everything we said is coming true and people are acting surprised.”



At issue is a so-called “grandfather” clause in the law stating that consumers would have the option of keeping policies in effect as of March 23, 2010,  even if they didn’t meet requirements of the new health care law. But the Department of Health and Human Services then wrote regulations that narrowed that provision, saying that if any part of a policy was significantly changed after that date — the deductible, co-pay, or benefits, for example — the policy would not be grandfathered.


The president, in accepting responsibility for Obamacare’s rocky rollout at a news conference Thursday, specifically addressed his repeated pledge that “if you like your insurance, you can keep it. Period.”  


Asked why he continued to say that when estimates from his own administration suggested millions of Americans would not be able to keep their insurance, Obama replied, “There is no doubt that the way I put that forward unequivocally ended up not being accurate. It was not because of my intention not to deliver on that commitment and that promise. We put a grandfather clause into the law but it was insufficient.” 


To fix the problem, Obama said that he would give health insurance plans the option to keep selling plans that don’t comply with Obamacare for one more year, effectively shifting the decision to insurers and state insurance commissioners.


In comments filed in August and December 2010, America’s Health Insurance Plans — a trade group representing 1,300 insurance plans — urged the administration to “reconsider” grandfathering rules because they were too stringent to allow many to keep their policies.


In mild rebuke to Obama, 39 Democrats vote with GOP on ‘Keep Your Plan’ bill 


In the first round of comments, AHIP stated that under the administration’s proposed regulations, “The percentage of individual market policies losing grandfathered status … will likely exceed the 40-67 percent range” and warned that could cause “disruptions” for those who wish to keep their policies.


When those proposed rules weren’t changed, AHIP again wrote in December, “We believe that more can and should be done to protect the interests of consumers who wish to maintain their existing coverage.”  


The individual market is made up of approximately 15 million Americans who purchase health insurance on their own. If 40 percent of those consumers lose their policies, that would work out to 6 million cancellations.


“The significance of the AHIP letters is that they show the administration was warned that their proposed grandfather rules were far too stringent for people’s plans to survive come 2014,” health care analyst Robert Laszewski, who consults for insurance companies, hospitals and physicians groups, told NBC News. “The industry told the administration that the historic rate at which consumers increase their out-of-pocket costs was far more than the very limited rules the administration ultimately wrote. The only foreseeable outcome would be that most plans would not survive. The administration, knowing that, went ahead with these stringent rules anyway.”


One state insurance commissioner, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said he sympathized with the president’s predicament and the political blowback he is getting. But the official said “the cancellations are consistent with what we expected under the regulations.” He said he didn’t know yet whether his state would or could implement the president’s suggestion that canceled policies be reinstated for a year. “We’re waiting to hear from our insurers and then will decide if it’s feasible or would mean even more chaos.”


During the same period, consumer groups complained that the administration’s rules were too lenient and would allow too many Americans to keep substandard policies that didn’t meet the new standards of the Affordable Care Act.


A senior administration official pointed out Friday that beyond suggesting that consumers be allowed to continue policies that were canceled, the president’s latest proposal informs consumers of their options:


Health exchanges slow to attract young and healthy


“Specifically, insurers offering these renewals must inform all consumers who either already have or will receive cancellation letters about the protections their renewed plan will not include and how they can learn about the new options available to them through the marketplaces, which will offer better protections and possible financial assistance,” said the official, also speaking on condition of anonymity.


Insurance commissioners from California, Florida, Kentucky and North Carolina said Friday they would move quickly to implement the president’s request.  Florida Insurance Commission Kevin McCarty said most insurers in his state already had voluntarily extended coverage for those impacted. Other state insurance officials suggested it may be too late in the game to change the rules.


More from NBC News Investigations:


Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook



Investigate this!


Read and vote on readers’ story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.







Insurers: We warned Obama

Friday, November 15, 2013

House passes Republican bill to let insurers offer old health plans

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The House of Representatives on Friday approved a Republican bill that would allow insurers to continue to offer for another year healthcare plans that do not comply with the higher standards of benefits under President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform law.


Reuters: Top News



House passes Republican bill to let insurers offer old health plans

Sunday, August 11, 2013

Analysis: Detroit crisis may give lift to muni bond insurers


Downtown Detroit is seen looking south on Grand River Avenue in Detroit, Michigan July 25, 2013. Photo taken July 25, 2013. REUTERS/Rebecca Cook

Downtown Detroit is seen looking south on Grand River Avenue in Detroit, Michigan July 25, 2013. Photo taken July 25, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Rebecca Cook






NEW YORK | Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:10am EDT



NEW YORK (Reuters) – At first glance, it is hard to see Detroit’s bankruptcy filing as anything but another body blow for downtrodden U.S. municipal bond insurers, which could be on the hook to investors for hundreds of millions of dollars in losses on the city’s debt.


But the city’s fiscal upheaval may in fact have the opposite effect – providing the marketing spark needed to revive a business decimated by the financial crisis like few others.


For issuers that have mostly gone without coverage since the 2007-09 financial crisis hammered most bond insurers, Detroit’s filing may serve as a stark reminder of the wisdom of buying insurance. Put simply, insurers’ payment guarantees make their bonds more attractive to investors.


“Investors are going to see the benefit of insurance in action more and more,” said Alan Schankel, head of fixed income research and strategy at Janney Capital Markets. “I think this is net-net a positive marketing story for bond insurance.”


Once a familiar fixture, bond insurance gave extra financial security to bondholders, including the retail investors who hold almost half of the $ 3.7 trillion market, while helping local issuers lower borrowing costs.


Before the crisis, about half of all new municipal bonds had insurance from nine insurers, with nearly 60 percent covered in 2005. Last year, just 3.6 percent were insured, and this year the number is just over 3 percent, Thomson Reuters data shows.


Bond insurers collapsed during the financial crisis after they ventured into mortgage-backed securities in the years before 2007. Ratings agencies slashed their AAA ratings to junk or withdrew them altogether. That meant bond issuers no longer benefited from their coverage.


With insurers failing to make promised payments, their stock tanked and so did their businesses.


Insurers are among the biggest players in Detroit’s case, as about 86 percent of the city’s $ 8 billion debt is insured by six companies. But the bulk of losses is expected on only about $ 530 million of unsecured general obligation bonds, which are payable over the next 22 years.


That makes the hit insurers would take from Detroit manageable, analysts say. At the same time, coming after other municipals bankruptcies such as Jefferson County in Alabama or Stockton and San Bernardino in California, Detroit would help investors see the benefit of bond insurance.


In June, Detroit defaulted on $ 1.45 billion of bonds issued to fund its pension obligations. Syncora, which insured most of those obligations, covered $ 24.7 million.


But Financial Guaranty Insurance, on the other hand, which is undergoing a court-ordered rehabilitation process, failed to pay about $ 16.2 million.


Insurers will keep paying debt service to most bondholders but not on the more than $ 5 billion of Detroit water and sewer bonds, as the city will keep current on those during the bankruptcy process.


Despite the record low presence of insurers on the primary market, some lower-grade, lesser-known issuers have reaped the benefits of insurance, with 645 deals insured for a total value of $ 6.57 billion so far this year.


The New York Dormitory Authority issued $ 60 million on behalf of Roosevelt school district earlier this year. Officials said insurance with Build America Mutual (BAM) saved 10 basis points on the borrowing costs, or about $ 200,000.


In March 2012, the Lafayette Yard Community Development Corporation sold $ 15.3 million of bonds guaranteed by the city of Trenton in New Jersey. After paying an insurance premium of about $ 139,000, the issuer saved about $ 60,000, in present value debt service payments, according to advisers for Trenton.


UNVIABLE BUSINESS MODEL?


Not everyone, however, is buying the idea that muni bond insurance is going to make a comeback.


“It’s not a very viable business model,” said Dan Berger, a muni market analyst at Municipal Market Data, a unit of Thomson Reuters. “The longer people do without insurance, the less they see a need for it.”


Still, the ratings of bond insurers are looking healthier. Of the two active insurers, BAM is rated AA by Standard & Poor’s and Assured Guaranty’s (AGO.N) MAC is rated AA-. S&P upgraded National Public Finance Guarantee, the muni-only insurer formed out of MBIA insurance Corp, to A in May after it settled a lawsuit over restructuring with Societe Generale.


There are signs competition is starting to creep back in. After BAM entered the market in 2012 with a focus on the safest types of municipal bonds, Assured announced its own muni-bond only insurer, Municipal Assurance Corp, in July. MBIA is also tipped for a return to the market.


Assured accounted for 99.8 percent of $ 11.5 billion of the new issues insured in 2012, according to Thomson Reuters.


Both BAM and Assured say they saw an uptick in interest even before Detroit, and Assured expects the market to gain steam.


Other muni bond insurers either declined to comment or did not return requests for comment.


DETROIT CONTAGION A RISK TO INSURERS


Any positive Motown impact on the insurance business will come if and only if Detroit is not the start of wave of defaults across U.S. municipalities. Such a scenario would be a severe blow for the bond insurance industry.


“The amounts of losses that we are talking about here are really quite manageable,” said Mark Palmer, an equity analyst at BTIG Research. “(But) if Detroit really is the first domino, then it would be an issue. It’s our view that Detroit really is a one off,” he said.


Palmer has a buy rating on the stocks of Assured Guaranty, MBIA, and Ambac (AMBC.O) and believes all three insurers are significantly undervalued at current levels.


Analysts and investors who believe bond insurance may have hit bottom do not suggest the industry is headed back to pre-crisis peak. They simply predict a rising demand.


Duane McAllister, a portfolio manager at BMO Global Assets Management who helps oversee about $ 5 billion in muni bonds, says the insured part of his portfolio has fallen to about 20 percent from 35 to 40 percent before the crisis. He would like to see that climb back to 25 percent, or even 30 percent.


“My view is that the industry has bottomed and that it is climbing its way back slowly,” said McAllister. “They are going to get tested obviously in the Detroit bankruptcy scenario, but if they can come through that and they’re still in OK shape, then they will have proven their value.”


(Reporting by Edward Krudy, Editing by Tiziana Barghini and Dan Grebler)





Reuters: Business News



Analysis: Detroit crisis may give lift to muni bond insurers