Showing posts with label Give. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Give. Show all posts

Sunday, April 6, 2014

Senate leaders give floor time to vulnerable Dems

Mark Pryor, Kay Hagan, Mary Landrieu and Mark Udall are shown in a composite. | AP Photos

Mark Pryor, Kay Hagan, Mary Landrieu and Mark Udall are all at risk in 2014. | AP Photos





Top Democrats are putting something special together for their Senate colleagues in tough races this year: a vulnerable-incumbent protection program.


At-risk senators will get to beef up their back-home cred by taking the lead on bills and amendments tailored to their campaigns. And they won’t be stuck in the back row at news conferences but will be in front of TV cameras and taking center stage during Senate debates.







It’s all part of an effort to blunt a furious Republican midterm campaign centered on attacking President Barack Obama and Democrats in the Senate who supported his signature health care law.


(PHOTOS: Senators up for election in 2014)


Leaders are coalescing around giving Arkansas Sen. Mark Pryor the lead on a bill to protect the Medicare eligibility age, which has become a key issue in his race. Kay Hagan will tout her fight for long-term unemployment benefits rejected by the GOP-dominated North Carolina Legislature and her likely opponent, statehouse Speaker Thom Tillis. And leaders hope to give Jeanne Shaheen a triumph on energy efficiency, a bipartisan breakthrough that would play well in purple New Hampshire.


There are other, more narrowly tailored options that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and his lieutenants could consider. Hagan has a bipartisan deal on a sportsman’s bill to shore up her hunting cred, while Colorado’s Mark Udall and Louisiana’s Mary Landrieu want to fast-track U.S. natural gas imports — a key industry in their states.


“We try to showcase our members who are up for reelection so they have a chance to shine and show what they believe in, why they are seeking reelection in their states,” said Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.). “I think it helps a lot.”


Other possibilities include bequeathing a veterans bill to Montana’s John Walsh, who served in the military, and taking up manufacturing legislation from Delaware’s Chris Coons. And Democratic leaders still haven’t ruled out a vote on proposed fixes to Obamacare championed by red-state Democrats, despite reluctance to do anything to undermine the law.


One of the most intense election-year pushes comes from Pryor, who wants to prevent House Republicans from raising the eligibility age of Medicare above 65. In Arkansas, he has repeatedly attacked GOP opponent Rep. Tom Cotton for supporting a conservative budget that would gradually raise the eligibility age to 70. Now he stands to get a vote on his own bill to build on those broadsides.


“People are concerned about that. And we have over 500,000 people in our state who are on Medicare, and it’s a very important part of their lives. And so we want to protect it and not let some folks — especially on the House side — try to fundamentally alter it,” Pryor said.


A spokesman for Cotton’s campaign shot back: “Anyone who voted for Obamacare, as Sen. Pryor did, can’t credibly claim to be ‘protecting Medicare.’”


The strategy isn’t just pursuing overtly partisan ideas to appeal to the Democratic base — though there’s plenty of that — but also about forcing Republicans to help some of their biggest Democratic targets score legislative victories.


Shaheen’s energy efficiency bill with Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) is on a shortlist of bipartisan proposals Reid may bring up by this summer. It may have sufficient GOP support to avoid a repeat of last fall, when a push by Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) on an Obamacare amendment tanked the bill, thanks to revisions made to incorporate ideas from both parties.


One senior Senate GOP aide stressed that such bipartisan measures still face an uncertain fate because Democratic leaders don’t want to vote on Republican energy amendments, including on the Keystone XL pipeline. And in an election year that tilts toward the GOP, some Republicans will be all too happy to stymie bipartisan bills that might help Democrats keep the Senate.


“Does that happen? Sure it does. I think we know that,” said Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee ranking member Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, a Shaheen-Portman supporter. “Sometimes people look at who the author is, and look at whether or not they’re running, and then decide whether they’re even going to look at the bill.”


Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) blamed election-year politics for preventing lawmakers during the previous Congress from passing a bill to increase access for hunters, anglers and other sportsmen — in part because his stewardship of the bill looked good back in Montana.


“Unfortunately, people thought that if they passed that, I’d win the race in Montana. Guess what? I won it anyway,” Tester said in an interview. “It needs to pass because it’s a good bill. Has nothing to do with politics.”


This time, the lead Democratic sponsor of sportsman legislation is Hagan, who is targeted by the GOP. Hagan introduced a bipartisan compromise in early February with Murkowski that is cosponsored by a swath of vulnerable Democrats and deal-seeking Republicans.


Hagan will have something even more state-specific to tout Monday when the Senate passes its unemployment bill. Democratic leaders slipped in Hagan’s language to restore long-term unemployment benefits to North Carolina that fell out of federal compliance — aid that expired under the watch of state House Speaker Tillis.


Though energy issues often divide Democrats, leaders also want to help Landrieu, the newly installed Senate Energy and Natural Resources chairwoman, claim a legislative win for her energy producing state. Landrieu passed a popular Senate bill to rein in rising flood insurance rates in Louisiana, but so did her chief GOP opponent, Rep. Bill Cassidy, accentuating the need for her to capitalize on a fortuitously timed leap to the chairmanship.




POLITICO – Congress



Senate leaders give floor time to vulnerable Dems

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Big donors may give even more under court"s ruling

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Big donors may give even more under court"s ruling

Big donors may give even more under court"s ruling







Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., right, followed by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I. leave a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, April 2, 2014, where they talked about the Supreme Court decision in the McCutcheon vs. FEC case, in which the Court struck down limits in federal law on the aggregate campaign contributions individual donors may make to candidates, political parties, and political action committees. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)





Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., right, followed by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I. leave a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, April 2, 2014, where they talked about the Supreme Court decision in the McCutcheon vs. FEC case, in which the Court struck down limits in federal law on the aggregate campaign contributions individual donors may make to candidates, political parties, and political action committees. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — The Supreme Court ruling Wednesday erasing a long-standing limit on campaign donations will allow a small number of very wealthy donors to give even more than is currently the case, according to students of the complex campaign finance system, and could strengthen the establishment in both parties.


While Republicans cheered the ruling on philosophical grounds and Democrats criticized it, there was a general agreement that the decision itself was unlikely to benefit one party over another.


“This is not a decision that advantages one party over the other. It advantages wealthy people over everybody else,” said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.


On a 5-4 ruling, the court struck down a limitation on the amount any donor may give to candidates, committees and political action committees combined.


Only 646 out of millions of donors in the election cycle of 2011-2012 gave the now-defunct legal maximum, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. For the current election cycle, the limit is $ 123,200, broken down as $ 48,600 to all candidates combined and $ 74,600 to all party committees and political action committees in total.


The ruling will “mean there will be much greater emphasis by the campaigns and the parties on those donors with the biggest checkbooks who can make those very large contributions,” said Bob Biersack, who works for the CRP and is a 30-year veteran of the Federal Election Commission.


“Whether that’s good or bad depends on your perspective on how this whole system should work, but it absolutely means that the small number of people who can give at those levels” will be asked to give more, he added.


The ruling leaves unchanged a parallel system in which individuals donate unlimited amounts, sometimes undisclosed, to certain outside groups. Biersack said the same small group of 646 donors gave a total of about $ 93.4 million in the last campaign. Their largesse will still be avidly sought, as Republican presidential hopefuls recently demonstrated by travelling to Las Vegas to meet with casino magnate and conservative donor Sheldon Adelson.


In the realm of limited donations, Cleta Mitchell, an election lawyer for Republicans, said the court’s ruling means that various party committees and candidates no longer will have to vie for money from the same contributors. The law permits a donor to contribute $ 5,200 for the primary and general election combined to any candidate, and if they did so, could donate only to nine office-seekers before reaching the $ 48,600 limit to all federal office-seekers.


Similarly, while Republicans and Democrats in Washington each maintain a national party committee, a Senate campaign committee and a House campaign committee, a donor could give the maximum allowable amount to only two of the three without violating the overall limitation the court discarded.


Now, Mitchell said, “the donors get to choose obviously, but the committees don’t have to feel like they’re pinching another party’s donors.”


In all, she described the ruling as “a positive for the parties.”


The court’s ruling also means that donors will be able to give $ 10,000 a year to as many state party committees as they want, so-called joint committees, in which a lawmaker can now solicit funds simultaneously for their own campaign, their own political action committee, their party and for an unlimited number of other candidates without donors exceeding the old limits.


Biersack cited House Speaker John Boehner’s fundraising efforts as an example, said he would now be able to use a joint fundraising committee for hundreds of Republican House candidates simultaneously, greatly expanding their ability to receive funds.


In theory, this ability could once more allow parties and their leaders to assert more discipline over rank-and-file lawmakers, who have become increasingly beholden to outside groups in recent years.


Ryan Call, chairman of the Colorado Republican Party and a campaign finance attorney, said the court’s ruling will be a boon to state parties, which he said have been neglected previously because donors hit the overall spending limit before they could distribute funds lower on the political food chain. “We have lots of optimism that this new decision would enable people who want to support us to do so,” he said.


Under the court’s ruling, a donor could donate the maximum $ 10,000 a year to each of their party’s 50 state committees, or a total of $ 1 million — and still donate to candidates as well as national party committees and political action committees.


Matt Canter, a spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, called the ruling a “win for national party committees” and said it will “greatly enhance our ability to raise resources to support our voter contact and field program … in states across the country.” He referred to a new field project to boost turnout in certain states with key Senate races this year.


While there was general agreement about the short-term impact of the ruling, there was a strong divergence of opinion on the wisdom of the court’s conservative majority. The case was the latest in which the justices found that many limits on contributions violate the givers’ constitutional free-speech rights.


Republicans who backed the suit challenging the overall limits cheered the ruling.


Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who filed a brief in support of the challenge, said the court “has once again reminded Congress that Americans have a constitutional First Amendment right to speak and associate with political candidates and parties of their choice.”


He added that court’s ruling makes it clear that it is the “right of the individual, and not the prerogative of Congress, to determine how many candidates and parties to support.”


Democrats said the ruling must be viewed in the context of earlier ones that they said strengthened the power of the wealthy.


Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., a former state attorney general, criticized the court’s majority in unusually sharp terms, saying the majority seems interested in “aligning political power in this country with political wealthy.”


Schumer said a Senate committee he chairs would hold hearings on the issue.


___


Associated Press writers Philip Elliott and Kenneth Thomas in Washington and Nicholas Riccardi in Denver contributed to this report.


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



Big donors may give even more under court"s ruling

Monday, March 17, 2014

‘Sovereign citizen’ fails to persuade judge that medieval laws give him claim to empty homes

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



‘Sovereign citizen’ fails to persuade judge that medieval laws give him claim to empty homes

Sunday, March 9, 2014

Obama"s Nobel Peace Prize: time to give it back?

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Obama"s Nobel Peace Prize: time to give it back?

Friday, February 21, 2014

Syria War: Rebels Give US Targets To Defeat Regime | Today"s New




The Free Syrian Army (FSA) and the United States intelligence services are working together on targets that will bring about regime change in the country, ac…




Syria War: Rebels Give US Targets To Defeat Regime | Today"s New

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

TED Talks - Jason Teteak: Give a TED talk everywhere you go

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


TED Talks - Jason Teteak: Give a TED talk everywhere you go

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Mike Lee to Give Tea Party Response to SOTU



Sen. Mike Lee will deliver the Tea Party response to President Obama’s State of the Union address next week.


The Utah lawmaker was elected in the 2010, succeeding Bob Bennett, who was ousted at the state GOP convention and was one of the first Republican incumbents to fall in the Tea Party wave that year.


Since joining the Senate in 2011, Lee has been a favorite of the movement and an obstacle to the president’s and congressional Democrats’ agenda. Most recently, he joined Ted Cruz in the failed strategy to defund the health care law, an effort that led to October’s government shutdown.


Republicans give an official response to the president’s address each year, but a separate Tea Party retort has become a recent trend; it is streamed online and sometimes carried on broadcast and cable television. Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachman and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul have previously performed this role.


“For the Tea Party movement, 2014 is not just about taking back the Senate, but it is also about putting forward conservative ideas that will allow for America to prosper,” said Amy Kremer, chairwoman of the Tea Party Express. She called Lee “both a Tea Party hero for supporters across the nation, and a conservative leader in the upper chamber.”


House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell typically pick a Republican to deliver the GOP’s official response, but no one has yet been named. Last year, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio delivered the televised address, during which he famously stopped to take a sip of water.


While Republicans are preparing their own agenda to challenge the president’s, the White House is working to attract the public to the speech and to engage them during it. In a YouTube video released Tuesday, Chief of Staff Denis McDonough announced a new initiative to involve supporters, asking them to view the address via the White House website, which will offer “an enhanced” version of the speech featuring charts, graphics and data to further explain the remarks.


The address “is not just a conversation with Congress, but a conversation with you, the American people,” McDonough says in the 2½-minute video, which begins with clips from previous addresses by former presidents, including John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush. 




Caitlin Huey-Burns is a congressional reporter for RealClearPolitics. She can be reached at chueyburns@realclearpolitics.com. Follow her on Twitter @CHueyBurnsRCP.




RealClearPolitics – Articles



Mike Lee to Give Tea Party Response to SOTU

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Secret Deals With Our Enemies: Just Give Peace A Chance

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Secret Deals With Our Enemies: Just Give Peace A Chance

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Barack Obama Tells Mike Bloomberg To Give Up On Gun Control


Mediaite.com:

After donating $ 2.5 million to the Democratic Senate Majority PAC, America’s favorite Democrat-turned-Republican-turned-independent, former New York City mayor Mike Bloomberg, is signaling that his great crusade against guns is running out of steam. The need for new gun laws that was so pressing in 2013, and that Bloomberg and his organization, Mayors Against Illegal Handguns, lobbied so hard for, is apparently no longer so acute. 

When he was not belittling or cajoling gun control’s foes, Bloomberg spent the better part of 2013 agitating for stricter gun laws. As recently as December 14, the first anniversary of the massacre in Newtown, both Bloomberg’s group and President Barack Obama’s political arm, Organizing for Action, sent out messages to their supporters insisting that the need for stricter gun laws is no less critical today than it was one year ago. 


But their actions speak differently. The president and Democrats were happy to support Bloomberg’s opposition toward the proliferation of firearms so long as it was not principled. However, when Bloomberg’s group released an ad targeting Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) over his opposition to new gun ownership restrictions, it became clear that Bloomberg was actually serious about this public policy initiative. So serious, in fact, that he would go as far as to challenge an embattled Democratic incumbent whose loss in November could help hand control of the U.S. Senate over to Republicans. This could not stand. 


“There had been information that I had as recently as two weeks ago that he was resisting pressure from both [Sens. Charles] Schumer (D-NY) and [Harry] Reid (D-NV) to defend Mark Pryor, or not to attack Mark Pryor, on the gun issue,” MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell said of Bloomberg’s latest move on Tuesday. 


Mitchell observed that Bloomberg had previously appeared to be “single issue focused on guns at the risk of jeopardizing Senate for Democrats.” TIME Magazine reporter Mark Halperin confirmed that Bloomberg not only resisted pressure from the two highest ranking Democrats in the Senate, but also former President Bill Clinton, who asked Bloomberg to temper his enthusiasm for attacking politicians who oppose stricter gun laws if those politicians happen to be Democrats. 


Halperin added that, while there are many Democrats in the Senate up for reelection this year, they all enjoy some advantages; including strong fundraising, weak Republican challengers, and incumbency itself. These incumbents, he insisted, may hang on in November in spite of six-year midterm headwinds, but attacking these Senate Democrats from the left could imperil them by reducing the base’s enthusiasm. 


CNN reports that the Democratic Super PAC to which Bloomberg donated millions has already gone up with ads in support of some of this election cycle’s most embattled Senate Democrats, including Pryor, Kay Hagan (D-NC) and Mark Begich (D-AK). Each voted “no” on a resolution that would have banned high-capacity magazines in April of last year. Thus, Bloomberg has financially rooted himself on both sides of the guns issue. 


RELATED:  Democrats backing away from gun control after a banner year for gun sales
Politik Ditto



Barack Obama Tells Mike Bloomberg To Give Up On Gun Control

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Obama: Give back this holiday season



In this week’s address, President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama wished everyone a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays.



By Patrick Garrity, NBC News


President Barack Obama used his annual Christmas message to urge Americans to remember troops serving far from home and embrace the spirit of the season and give back.


“Our extraordinary men and women in uniform are serving so that the rest of us can enjoy the blessings we cherish during the holidays,” the president said in a pre-recorded message with first lady Michelle Obama by his side. “But that means many of our troops are far from home and far from family.”


The president urged people to celebrate the season with service by volunteering at a soup kitchen, buying gifts for kids in need or organizing food and clothing drives.


“For families like ours, that service is a chance to celebrate the birth of Christ and live out what He taught us — to love our neighbors as we would ourselves; to feed the hungry and look after the sick; to be our brother’s keeper and our sister’s keeper,” he said.


In his weekly radio and Internet address, Obama says the values Jesus taught can spur Americans of all faiths to be better parents, friends, neighbors and citizens.


The first lady echoed the message:


“So as we look to the New Year, let’s pledge ourselves to living out those values by reaching out and lifting up those in our communities who could use a hand up,” Michelle said.






Obama: Give back this holiday season

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Ukraine police give protesters deadline, PM brands them "Nazis"




KIEV Thu Dec 5, 2013 2:14pm EST





People sing the national anthem during a rally to support EU integration in Kiev December 5, 2013. REUTERS/Vasily Fedosenko


1 of 5. People sing the national anthem during a rally to support EU integration in Kiev December 5, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Vasily Fedosenko




KIEV (Reuters) – Ukrainian police on Thursday warned pro-Europe protesters they faced a “harsh” crackdown if they did not end their occupation of public offices in Kiev, while President Viktor Yanukovich’s prime minister denounced them as “Nazis and criminals”.


The authorities issued the tough warnings as foreign ministers held a European security conference in a city seething with unrest over the Ukrainian government’s U-turn away from Europe back towards Russia.


Germany’s visiting foreign minister used the occasion to warn Ukraine against violently cracking down on protesters. Russia’s responded by accusing EU officials of “hysteria”.


Kiev’s November 21 decision to abandon a trade and integration deal with the EU and pursue closer economic ties with Moscow brought hundreds of thousands of demonstrators into the streets over the weekend. Protesters have since blockaded the main government headquarters and occupied Kiev’s city hall.


Prime Minister Mykola Azarov defended his government’s handling of the crisis. He clashed sharply with Germany’s Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, who has used his visit to Kiev for a conference of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe to show solidarity with the demonstrators.


“Nazis, extremists and criminals cannot be, in any way, our partners in ‘Eurointegration’,” the government website quoted Azarov as telling Westerwelle.


Westerwelle expressed concern about police behavior at the protests, when dozens of people were severely beaten.


“Recent events, in particular the violence against peaceful demonstrators last Saturday in Kiev worry me greatly,” said Westerwelle. “The way Ukraine responds to the pro-European rallies is a yardstick for how seriously Ukraine takes the shared values of the OSCE.”


In a pointed gesture, Westerwelle visited the main protest center on Kiev’s Independence Square on Wednesday and met opposition leaders who have called for Yanukovich to resign. Several other EU ministers made the same trip on Thursday.


The crisis has exposed a gulf between Ukrainians, many from the west of the country, who hope to move rapidly into the European mainstream, and those mainly from the east who look to the former Soviet master Moscow as a guarantor of stability.


EU countries, especially those like Germany and Poland with experience of Cold War-era Russian domination, are keen to bind Ukraine and its 46 million people closely with the West and say their trade pact would have brought a surge of investment.


Moscow wants Kiev instead to join a customs union that it dominates with other ex-Soviet republics. Russia exerts powerful leverage because of Ukraine’s dependence on its natural gas.


A court ordered the protesters on Thursday to quit the Kiev mayor’s office, where they have set up an operational hub, and halt their four-day blockade of government buildings.


In perhaps the strongest signal yet that the authorities are contemplating action to reclaim the streets, the head of the Kiev police, Valery Mazan, said: “We do not want to use force. But if the law is broken, we will act decisively, harshly.


“We will not try to talk people round. We have the means and capability laid down by the law,” he added.


SOLIDARITY GESTURE


The stand-off between pro-EU protesters and the government is taking a toll on the fragile economy. The central bank has twice been forced to support the currency this week and the cost of insuring Ukraine’s debt against default has risen further.


Ukraine faces a $ 17 billion bill next year for debt repayments and deliveries of Russian gas.


About 3,000 pro-Europe demonstrators, mainly from western Ukrainian-speaking parts of the country, have been camped out in Independence Square since Sunday. They huddle round blazing braziers, swap anecdotes about events of the day and follow news developments on a huge TV screen.


Speaking to the OSCE session, Victoria Nuland, U.S. Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs, urged “all sides” to renounce violence, respect the right to peaceful assembly and the rule of law.


Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov spoke scathingly about Europe’s reaction to Ukraine’s decision to seek closer trade ties with Moscow.


“This situation is linked with the hysteria that some Europeans have raised over Ukraine which, using its sovereign right, decided at the current moment not to sign any agreement which Ukrainian experts and authorities considered disadvantageous,” Russia’s Itar-Tass news agency quoted Lavrov as saying on the sidelines of the OSCE meeting.


Yanukovich, who is visiting Beijing, suggested some relief could be on the way for the distressed economy, signing documents for deals with China on agriculture, infrastructure improvement and energy. He estimated their value at about $ 8 billion of investment in the Ukrainian economy.


Ukraine faces huge problems in financing its current account deficit. Severely depleted central bank reserves are also putting Ukraine at risk of a balance-of-payments crunch.


One analyst, Timothy Ash of Standard Bank, doubted the long-term investment commitments from China would help an immediate cash shortage. “Ukraine needs short term cash/financing, and likely of the order of USD10-15bn at this stage in up-front cash to make a difference,” he said.


TYMOSHENKO CALL FOR SANCTIONS


The Kiev government says it has not ditched the trade deal with Europe but is taking a strategic “pause” while it negotiates a new “roadmap” with Russia to patch up its economy.


Protesters consider the move to have been an abrupt reversal to Ukraine’s march towards Europe. They hope to repeat the success of the “Orange Revolution” nine years ago, when mass demonstrations forced the overturning of a fraudulent presidential election victory for Yanukovich.


Azarov’s deputy, Serhiy Arbuzov, who is preparing to head Ukraine’s first high-level delegation to Brussels soon to repair some of the political damage, suggested the government might be ready to consider one of the opposition’s demands – early parliamentary elections. There has been no suggestion from Azarov that he is ready to go along with this idea.


Before negotiations were halted, the EU had pressed Ukraine to release Yulia Tymoshenko, who served as prime minister after the Orange Revolution but lost a presidential election in 2010 to Yanukovich and was later jailed for abuse of office. Brussels considers her a political prisoner.


On the eve of a fresh attempt to bring her to trial on new charges, Tymoshenko called for the West to apply “targeted sanctions” against Yanukovich and his family. This “is the only language he understands,” she said, according to her lawyer.


(Additional reporting by Pavel Polityuk and Natalia Zinets in Kiev, Megha Rajagopalan and Ben Blanchard in Beijing; Editing by Peter Graff)





Reuters: Top News



Ukraine police give protesters deadline, PM brands them "Nazis"

Saturday, November 23, 2013

A Plan To Have Humans Give Birth To Dolphins And Then Eat Them



Is this what will give your life meaning? In his project I Wanna Deliver A Dolphin, designer Ai Hasegawa envisions solving food shortages, the endangered species crisis, and our urge to reproduce by having us give birth to dolphins via synthetic placentas…and then consume their meat.


The struggle to raise a child in decent conditions is becoming harder due to gross overpopulation and an increasingly strained global environment. Would a woman consider incubating and giving birth to an endangered species such as a shark, tuna or dolphin?


This project imagines a point in the future, where humans will help this species by the advanced technology of synthetic biology. A ‘dolp-human placenta’ that allows a human female to deliver a dolphin is created, and thus humans can become a surrogate mother to endangered species. Furthermore, gourmets would be able to enjoy the luxury of eating a rare animal: an animal made by their own body.




disinformation



A Plan To Have Humans Give Birth To Dolphins And Then Eat Them

Monday, October 28, 2013

The Lowdown on Social Security, and the Republican attempts to give more to the rich.

For some, Social Security is something that needs to be cut, an “entitlement” that Paul Ryan describes often as a hammock. That “hammock” helped Ryan pay for college.

I ran across this explanation that I thought explained what has happened to SS, no thanks to the Republican whiners who’ve benefited from pillaging the trust fund for their own benefit. Democrats have been a part of this too, but they’re not the ones who want to downsize it.


Social Security is running on a  surplus of $ 2.6 trillion, it’s funded until  2037, it  cannot run out of money, it  cannot contribute to the deficit, it has  lower administrative costs than private sector 401k retirement plans, and it’s wildly popular … a report by the  AARP Public Policy Institute found that Social Security stimulates the economy, adding more than $ 1 trillion to the U.S. economy each year.

The Free-Market Alternative Doesn’t Work: Stunningly, the number of private sector workers  covered by a pension with a guaranteed payout has dropped from 60 percent to 10 percent. 



The most important thing to remember about the “evils of redistribution,” it’s just the opposite of what Republicans are telling you. Social Security money has been redistributed to the wealthy, not the other way around:


Redistribution Has Moved Retirement Money from the Middle Class to the Rich: Tax Expenditures — subsidies from special deductions, exemptions, exclusions, credits, capital gains, and loopholes that move  tax money to the richest taxpayers — are  estimated to be worth up to  8% of the GDP, or about $ 1.2 trillion. That alone is more than enough to pay for  Social Security ($ 883 billion).


Because of this misdirected revenue, government has been forced to  borrow from Social Security to fund its programs. Most notably,  George W. Bush took our retirement money to pay for his two wars and his tax cuts for the rich. 



If you take anything away from this article, it’s this:


This last reason, more than any of the others, reveals the overwhelming unfairness of cutting Social Security. In effect, the middle class is being told to replenish its own savings account after those savings were passed along to the military and the super-rich. 




Democurmudgeon



The Lowdown on Social Security, and the Republican attempts to give more to the rich.

Saturday, October 5, 2013

Obama to public: Don"t give up on health sign-ups







In this photo taken Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, President Barack Obama poses for a photo prior to an exclusive interview with The Associated Press in the White House library in Washington four days into a partial shutdown of the government. Obama, who successfully ran for president as a first-term senator, spoke critically about first-term Republican senators, such as Ted Cruz of Texas, who have been leading efforts to shut the government if Republicans can’t extract concessions from the White House. He said that when he was in the Senate, he “didn’t go around courting the media. And I certainly didn’t go around trying to shut down the government.” (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)





In this photo taken Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, President Barack Obama poses for a photo prior to an exclusive interview with The Associated Press in the White House library in Washington four days into a partial shutdown of the government. Obama, who successfully ran for president as a first-term senator, spoke critically about first-term Republican senators, such as Ted Cruz of Texas, who have been leading efforts to shut the government if Republicans can’t extract concessions from the White House. He said that when he was in the Senate, he “didn’t go around courting the media. And I certainly didn’t go around trying to shut down the government.” (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)





In this photo taken Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, President Barack Obama speaks during an exclusive interview with The Associated Press in the White House library in Washington. “There are enough votes in the House of Representatives to make sure that the government reopens today,” Obama said. “And I’m pretty willing to bet that there are enough votes in the House of Representatives right now to make sure that the United States doesn’t end up being a deadbeat,” he said. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)





In this photo taken Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, President Barack Obama speaks during an exclusive interview with The Associated Press in the White House library in Washington. “I recognize that in today’s media age, being controversial, taking controversial positions, rallying the most extreme parts of your base, whether it’s left or right, is a lot of times the fastest way to get attention and raise money,” Obama said. “But it’s not good for government.” (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)





In this photo taken Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, President Barack Obama speaks during an exclusive interview with The Associated Press in the White House library in Washington. Defending the shaky rollout of his health care law, Obama said frustrated Americans “definitely shouldn’t give up” on the problem-plagued program now at the heart of his dispute with Republicans over reopening the federal government. Obama said he would be willing to negotiate with Republicans on health care, deficit reduction and spending, only if Republican House Speaker John Boehner holds votes to reopen the government and increase the nation’s borrowing limit. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







WASHINGTON (AP) — Defending the shaky rollout of his health care law, President Barack Obama said frustrated Americans “definitely shouldn’t give up” on the problem-plagued program now at the heart of his dispute with Republicans over reopening the federal government.


Obama said public interest far exceeded the government’s expectations, causing technology glitches that thwarted millions of Americans when trying to use government-run health care websites.


“Folks are working around the clock and have been systematically reducing the wait times,” he said.


The federal gateway website was taken down for repairs over the weekend, again hindering people from signing up for insurance.


Obama, in a wide-ranging interview with The Associated Press, also disclosed that U.S. intelligence agencies believe Iran continues to be a year or more away from having the capability to make a nuclear weapon. That assessment is at odds with Israel, which contends Tehran is on a faster course toward a bomb.


He expressed optimism about the blossoming diplomacy between his administration and Iran’s new president, but said the U.S. would not accept a “bad deal” on the Islamic republic’s nuclear program.


The president spoke to the AP on Friday, four days into a partial shutdown of the federal government that has forced 800,000 people off the job, closed national parks and curbed many government services.


Obama reiterated his opposition to negotiating with House Republicans to end the shutdown or raise the nation’s debt ceiling.


“There are enough votes in the House of Representatives to make sure that the government reopens today,” he said. “And I’m pretty willing to bet that there are enough votes in the House of Representatives right now to make sure that the United States doesn’t end up being a deadbeat.”


On other points, Obama:


—Contrasted his tenure as a senator with the current crop of first-term Republican senators, saying he “didn’t go around courting the media” or “trying to shut down the government” while he was in the Senate.


—Said he’s considering keeping some American forces in Afghanistan after the war formally ends in late 2014, if an agreement can be reached with the Afghan government. He tried to do the same in Iraq but was unable to reach an agreement with its government.


—Suggested that the owner of the Washington Redskins football team consider changing its name because, the president said, the current name offends “a sizable group of people.”


With no sign of a breakthrough to end the government shutdown, Obama said he would be willing to negotiate with Republicans on health care, deficit reduction and spending — but only if House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, holds votes to reopen the government and increase the nation’s borrowing limit.


Some House Republicans are seeking health care concessions from Obama in exchange for approving government financing and want more spending cuts before raising the debt ceiling.


The Treasury Department says the nation will hit its borrowing limit around Oct. 17. Obama didn’t specifically rule out taking action on his own if Congress fails to increase the debt ceiling, but said he doesn’t expect to get to that point.


Obama, who successfully ran for president as a first-term senator, also spoke critically about first-term Republican senators, such as Ted Cruz of Texas, who have been leading efforts to shut the government if Republicans can’t extract concessions from the White House.


The president said that when he was in the Senate, he “didn’t go around courting the media. And I certainly didn’t go around trying to shut down the government.”


“I recognize that in today’s media age, being controversial, taking controversial positions, rallying the most extreme parts of your base, whether it’s left or right, is a lot of times the fastest way to get attention and raise money,” he said. “But it’s not good for government.”


The deadline for keeping the government open coincided with the Oct. 1 start of sign-ups for the insurance markets at the center of the health care overhaul Obama signed into law during his first term. Government websites struggled in the first week to keep up with high demand for the new marketplaces. It’s not clear that more than a few managed to enroll the first day.


Obama said he didn’t know how many people had enrolled. Administration officials have said they do not plan to release real-time data on the number of people enrolling, though some states running their own exchange websites are doing so.


The president predicted that when the six-month signup window for the insurance exchanges ends, “we are going to probably exceed what anybody expected in terms of the amount of interest that people had.”


In the flurry of domestic issues consuming his second term, Obama has launched a diplomatic outreach to Iran, aimed at resolving the dispute over Tehran’s nuclear program. Last week, he spoke by phone with President Hassan Rouhani, marking the first direct exchange between U.S. and Iranian leaders in more than 30 years.


“Rouhani has staked his position on the idea that he can improve relations with the rest of the world,” Obama said. “And so far he’s been saying a lot of the right things. And the question now is, can he follow through?”


But Obama said Rouhani is not Iran’s only “decision-maker. He’s not even the ultimate decision-maker,” a reference to the control wielded by Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.


Given the supreme leader’s broad influence, some countries, most notably Israel, have questioned whether Rouhani actually represents real change in Iran or just new packaging of old policies.


Khamenei said Saturday that he supported Rouhani’s outreach to the West, but at the same time called the U.S. government “untrustworthy, arrogant, illogical and a promise-breaker,” according to comment summarized on his website.


Obama also put distance between U.S. and Israeli assessments of when Iran might have the capacity to build a nuclear weapon. Israeli officials have said Iran is just months away from being able to build a bomb, while Obama said Tehran was a year or more away.


The president used the same timetable in March, before traveling to Israel. The U.S. and Israel contend that Iran’s nuclear program is aimed at building a bomb, while Tehran says it is enriching uranium for peaceful purposes.


On the 12-year war in Afghanistan, Obama said he would consider keeping some American forces on the ground after the conflict formally ends next year, but acknowledged that doing so would require an agreement from the Afghan government. He suggested that if no agreement can be reached, he would be comfortable with a full pullout of U.S. troops.


“If in fact we can get an agreement that makes sure that U.S. troops are protected, makes sure that we can operate in a way that is good for our national security, then I’ll certainly consider that,” he said. “If we can’t, we will continue to make sure that all the gains we’ve made in going after al-Qaida we accomplish, even if we don’t have any U.S. military on Afghan soil.”


All U.S. forces left Iraq at the end of 2011 after no deal could be reached to keep some there longer.


Obama, an avid sports fan, also weighed in on the controversy surrounding the Redskins as the name of Washington’s NFL football team. The name has faced a new barrage of criticism for being offensive to Native Americans.


The president said he doesn’t think Redskins’ fans mean any offense by using the name. But he added: “If I were the owner of the team and I knew that the name of my team, even if they’ve had a storied history, that was offending a sizable group of people, I’d think about changing it.”


___


Follow Julie Pace at http://twitter.com/jpaceDC


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



Obama to public: Don"t give up on health sign-ups

Obama to public: Don"t give up on health sign-ups







In this photo taken Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, President Barack Obama speaks during an exclusive interview with The Associated Press in the White House library in Washington. “There are enough votes in the House of Representatives to make sure that the government reopens today,” Obama said. “And I’m pretty willing to bet that there are enough votes in the House of Representatives right now to make sure that the United States doesn’t end up being a deadbeat,” he said. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)





In this photo taken Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, President Barack Obama speaks during an exclusive interview with The Associated Press in the White House library in Washington. “There are enough votes in the House of Representatives to make sure that the government reopens today,” Obama said. “And I’m pretty willing to bet that there are enough votes in the House of Representatives right now to make sure that the United States doesn’t end up being a deadbeat,” he said. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)





In this photo taken Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, President Barack Obama speaks during an exclusive interview with The Associated Press in the White House library in Washington. “I recognize that in today’s media age, being controversial, taking controversial positions, rallying the most extreme parts of your base, whether it’s left or right, is a lot of times the fastest way to get attention and raise money,” Obama said. “But it’s not good for government.” (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)





In this photo taken Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, President Barack Obama speaks during an exclusive interview with The Associated Press in the White House library in Washington. Defending the shaky rollout of his health care law, Obama said frustrated Americans “definitely shouldn’t give up” on the problem-plagued program now at the heart of his dispute with Republicans over reopening the federal government. Obama said he would be willing to negotiate with Republicans on health care, deficit reduction and spending, only if Republican House Speaker John Boehner holds votes to reopen the government and increase the nation’s borrowing limit. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)





In this photo taken Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, President Barack Obama poses for a photo prior to an exclusive interview with The Associated Press in the White House library in Washington four days into a partial shutdown of the government. Obama, who successfully ran for president as a first-term senator, spoke critically about first-term Republican senators, such as Ted Cruz of Texas, who have been leading efforts to shut the government if Republicans can’t extract concessions from the White House. He said that when he was in the Senate, he “didn’t go around courting the media. And I certainly didn’t go around trying to shut down the government.” (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — Defending the shaky rollout of his health care law, President Barack Obama said frustrated Americans “definitely shouldn’t give up” on the problem-plagued program now at the heart of his dispute with Republicans over reopening the federal government.


Obama said public interest far exceeded the government’s expectations, causing technology glitches that thwarted millions of Americans when trying to use government-run health care websites.


“Folks are working around the clock and have been systematically reducing the wait times,” he said.


The federal gateway website was taken down for repairs over the weekend, again hindering people from signing up for insurance.


Obama, in a wide-ranging interview with The Associated Press, also disclosed that U.S. intelligence agencies believe Iran continues to be a year or more away from having the capability to make a nuclear weapon. That assessment is at odds with Israel, which contends Tehran is on a faster course toward a bomb.


He expressed optimism about the blossoming diplomacy between his administration and Iran’s new president, but said the U.S. would not accept a “bad deal” on the Islamic republic’s nuclear program.


The president spoke to the AP on Friday, four days into a partial shutdown of the federal government that has forced 800,000 people off the job, closed national parks and curbed many government services.


Obama reiterated his opposition to negotiating with House Republicans to end the shutdown or raise the nation’s debt ceiling.


“There are enough votes in the House of Representatives to make sure that the government reopens today,” he said. “And I’m pretty willing to bet that there are enough votes in the House of Representatives right now to make sure that the United States doesn’t end up being a deadbeat.”


On other points, Obama:


—Contrasted his tenure as a senator with the current crop of first-term Republican senators, saying he “didn’t go around courting the media” or “trying to shut down the government” while he was in the Senate.


—Said he’s considering keeping some American forces in Afghanistan after the war formally ends in late 2014, if an agreement can be reached with the Afghan government. He tried to do the same in Iraq but was unable to reach an agreement with its government.


—Suggested that the owner of the Washington Redskins football team consider changing its name because, the president said, the current name offends “a sizable group of people.”


With no sign of a breakthrough to end the government shutdown, Obama said he would be willing to negotiate with Republicans on health care, deficit reduction and spending — but only if House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, holds votes to reopen the government and increase the nation’s borrowing limit.


Some House Republicans are seeking health care concessions from Obama in exchange for approving government financing and want more spending cuts before raising the debt ceiling.


The Treasury Department says the nation will hit its borrowing limit around Oct. 17. Obama didn’t specifically rule out taking action on his own if Congress fails to increase the debt ceiling, but said he doesn’t expect to get to that point.


Obama, who successfully ran for president as a first-term senator, also spoke critically about first-term Republican senators, such as Ted Cruz of Texas, who have been leading efforts to shut the government if Republicans can’t extract concessions from the White House.


The president said that when he was in the Senate, he “didn’t go around courting the media. And I certainly didn’t go around trying to shut down the government.”


“I recognize that in today’s media age, being controversial, taking controversial positions, rallying the most extreme parts of your base, whether it’s left or right, is a lot of times the fastest way to get attention and raise money,” he said. “But it’s not good for government.”


The deadline for keeping the government open coincided with the Oct. 1 start of sign-ups for the insurance markets at the center of the health care overhaul Obama signed into law during his first term. Government websites struggled in the first week to keep up with high demand for the new marketplaces. It’s not clear that more than a few managed to enroll the first day.


Obama said he didn’t know how many people had enrolled. Administration officials have said they do not plan to release real-time data on the number of people enrolling, though some states running their own exchange websites are doing so.


The president predicted that when the six-month signup window for the insurance exchanges ends, “we are going to probably exceed what anybody expected in terms of the amount of interest that people had.”


In the flurry of domestic issues consuming his second term, Obama has launched a diplomatic outreach to Iran, aimed at resolving the dispute over Tehran’s nuclear program. Last week, he spoke by phone with President Hassan Rouhani, marking the first direct exchange between U.S. and Iranian leaders in more than 30 years.


“Rouhani has staked his position on the idea that he can improve relations with the rest of the world,” Obama said. “And so far he’s been saying a lot of the right things. And the question now is, can he follow through?”


But Obama said Rouhani is not Iran’s only “decision-maker. He’s not even the ultimate decision-maker,” a reference to the control wielded by Iran’s supreme leader, Ayotollah Ali Khamenei.


Given the supreme leader’s broad influence, some countries, most notably Israel, have questioned whether Rouhani actually represents real change in Iran or just new packaging of old policies.


Obama also put distance between U.S. and Israeli assessments of when Iran might have the capacity to build a nuclear weapon. Israeli officials have said Iran is just months away from being able to build a bomb, while Obama said Tehran was a year or more away.


The president used the same timetable in March, before traveling to Israel. The U.S. and Israel contend that Iran’s nuclear program is aimed at building a bomb, while Tehran says it is enriching uranium for peaceful purposes.


On the 12-year war in Afghanistan, Obama said he would consider keeping some American forces on the ground after the conflict formally ends next year, but acknowledged that doing so would require an agreement from the Afghan government. He suggested that if no agreement can be reached, he would be comfortable with a full pullout of U.S. troops.


“If in fact we can get an agreement that makes sure that U.S. troops are protected, makes sure that we can operate in a way that is good for our national security, then I’ll certainly consider that,” he said. “If we can’t, we will continue to make sure that all the gains we’ve made in going after al-Qaida we accomplish, even if we don’t have any U.S. military on Afghan soil.”


All U.S. forces left Iraq at the end of 2011 after no deal could be reached to keep some there longer.


Obama, an avid sports fan, also weighed in on the controversy surrounding the Redskins as the name of Washington’s NFL football team. The name has faced a new barrage of criticism for being offensive to Native Americans.


The president said he doesn’t think Redskins’ fans mean any offense by using the name. But he added: “If I were the owner of the team and I knew that the name of my team, even if they’ve had a storied history, that was offending a sizable group of people, I’d think about changing it.”


___


Follow Julie Pace at http://twitter.com/jpaceDC


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



Obama to public: Don"t give up on health sign-ups