Showing posts with label schools'. Show all posts
Showing posts with label schools'. Show all posts

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Schools evacuated after suspicious device found on rail car

Schools evacuated after suspicious device found on rail car
http://thedailynewsreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/8df71__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif


posted on Nov, 21 2013 @ 12:09 PM


I would be interested to know what is considered to be a “suspicious package”. I see lots of weird things on rail cars every day. It probably is just a car destined to a different customer that was mistakenly left in the wrong track by the train crew servicing the industry. We make mistakes just like anyone else!

Edit: or it could be a drug shipment. It is common to have drug shipments attached to rail cars coming from Mexico. The border patrol may have missed one.


edit on 11/21/2013 by Montana because: (no reason given)





AboveTopSecret.com New Topics In Breaking Alternative News




Read more about Schools evacuated after suspicious device found on rail car and other interesting subjects concerning Top Stories at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Monday, September 23, 2013

Thanks to Governor Corbett, Philly Schools Open Overcrowded and Understaffed


Jaisal Noor, TRNN Producer: Welcome to The Real News Network. I’m Jaisal Noor in Baltimore.


When Philadelphia public school students returned to class earlier this month, they were attending a district wracked by the firing of thousands of employees and the shuttering of 23 schools due to an over $ 300 million budget deficit.


Now joining us to discuss this is Rania Khalek. She’s an independent journalist reporting on the underclass and marginalized. Her work has appeared in AlterNet, Common Dreams, and In These Times magazine. Her recent piece for Truthout is titled “The Systematic Murder of Philadelphia’s Public Schools”.


Thank you so much for joining us, Rania.


Rania Khalek, Independent Journalist: Thanks for having me.


Noor: So, Rania, you’ve been reporting extensively on public education across the country. And we’re going to start our series of interviews with you in Philadelphia, which is perhaps or maybe undoubtedly the school district in the greatest point of crisis around the country. Can you describe the scale of what Philadelphia’s going through right now?


Khalek: Yeah. So, like you mentioned, there were thousands of teachers, almost 4,000–not just teachers–teachers, counselors, school aides, secretaries, assistant principals that were laid off at the end of last school year. And there has also been 23 Philadelphia public schools that were shut down this year. So students went to very different–the year just started, and the year’s already very different than it was before.


Philadelphia public schools are very dramatically underfunded. They’ve been financially starved for years–like you mentioned, over a $ 300 million right now of a deficit. And so the school closings and the laying off of pretty much every possible imaginable person that’s necessary for a school to function is basically being justified by the fact that there isn’t enough money.


And a lot of that’s true.


But, you know, what you have in the end is you have students who literally–I mean, they don’t–they’re going back to schools where there’s larger classrooms. There’s no extracurricular activities. I mean, almost everything the program has been cut–arts, music, sports, and counselors. I mean, one of the biggest problems right now is there’s no counselors. I mean, there’s–one school was able to get one of their counselors back, and it’s, like, one counselor for 1,200 students. And if you think about it, I mean, think about being a senior in high school and how much you really, you know, depend on your counselor to help you applying to colleges, I mean, it’s just–it’s really a mess. It’s a nightmare scenario for Philly public school students right now.


Noor: And many of these students are the highest needs students, the most underprivileged that are getting the brunt of these cutbacks. Can you talk about just how the process of the school–that the schools were closed and the layoffs happened? It can’t exactly be described as democratic.


Khalek: No, not at all. In Philly–and this is something you see around the country in these cities where a lot of schools are being shut down and defunded–is there’s no democratic control over the school system. There’s either mayoral control like you have in Chicago and D.C. or like in Philly–Philly public schools are under state control. Mostly there’s what’s called the School Reform Commission, which was put in place in [incompr.] 2002. It’s basically made up of five individuals, three of which are appointed by the governor, and the other two are appointed by the mayor. And they’re accountable to nobody. I mean, they’re not elected.


So the people of Philadelphia, I mean, there’s no way that the city would be able to implement these kind of draconian policies towards education if the people of Philadelphia had any say, because they are adamantly opposed to the defunding, the dismantling of their public school system. So, yeah, this entire structure of shutting down schools is completely dependent on an undemocratic, very authoritarian process.


Noor: And some have described this as a crisis that was man-made. Talk about the state’s role and the governor, Tom Corbett, a Republican governor, what his role has been in this crisis in Philadelphia.


Khalek: Yeah. So Pennsylvania is a unique state. It’s one of a handful of states that doesn’t have a funding formula for how they fund public education throughout the state. So in Pennsylvania, because of that, actually spends, like, the least amount of money in proportion to other states around the country. It’s, like, one of the last–one of the least–there’s, like, ten states that spend very little money–and Pennsylvania is one of them–on public education. So it basically forces school districts to rely on federal funding and local property taxes.


So what happens is for poor districts like Philadelphia that don’t have as high property taxes or there’s not as much homeownership, so not as many people are paying property taxes, you have fewer funds. And so this obviously dramatically affects public education. And that’s one of the reasons you see such a deficit every year with Philadelphia public schools.


On top of that, you’ve got a Republican governor who every single year since he’s been in office has, you know, cut a huge chunk of the state’s public education budget. And so that severely impacts districts like Philadelphia that are already struggling to get by. So that’s why you see this really, you know, severe scenario right now where there’s thousands of teachers and, you know, counselors and teachers aides that have been fired and schools closed, because, like I said, the district, despite being financially starved, a lot of that is because of the state.


Noor: And, finally, you know, this isn’t going down without a fight. Can you talk about what teachers and students and parents are doing to challenge these policies?


Khalek: So Philadelphia is really unique also because it’s got a really vibrant community of residents who are adamantly opposed to education, to the corporate education agenda, I guess you could call it. There’s, you know, the student–the Philadelphia Student Union has been on top of this. It’s–they’ve done student walkouts, they’ve coordinated student walkouts. There’s teachers, the teachers union. There’s also teachers organizations that have been involved. And there was–you know, when the counselors were fired at the end of last year, there was–they did this really, really great campaign where they basically, like, promoted various counselors and talked about, like, the personal–the way that they personally help students that they’ve worked with. There was also a hunger strike that involved, you know, teachers and parents late last year. And, you know, this activism is continuing. And there’s protests all the time. There’s–you know, it happens all the time. There’s protests outside of the School Reform Commission. Whenever they have meetings, there’s constantly this activism going on, this organizing. So it’s really–that part’s really, really exciting. It’s just difficult for them to have an impact when the people making these decisions are not accountable to the residents.


Noor: Rania Khalek, thank you so much for joining us.


Khalek: Thanks for having me.


Noor: And this is just the first part of our series of interviews with Rania about her work. Go to TheRealNews.com for that full collection. Thank you so much for joining us.


Also See: The “Systematic Murder” of Philadelphia Public Schools




Truthout Stories



Thanks to Governor Corbett, Philly Schools Open Overcrowded and Understaffed

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Student Loan Debate, Redux, as Donor Schools Weigh In


student money.jpgA feeling of déjà vu permeates the current student loan debate. Just last June, President Barack Obama and Congress agreed on holding the interest rate for unsubsidized Stafford loans at 3.4 percent. But that agreement expires on July 1. If Congress does not pass negotiate another deal, unsubsidized Stafford loan interest those rates will double — meaning more than 7 million students will need to pay $ 1,000 more per loan per year, according to the White House.

Opensecrets.org data shows that the education industry has invested heavily in members of the House and Senate who currently are working on bills to address the issue. 


Rep. John Kline‘s proposal, H.R. 1911: Smarter Solutions for Students Act, gained House approval with a vote of 221-198 on May 23. The bill aims to peg subsidized and unsubsidized Stafford loan rates to the rates of 10-year Treasury notes plus 2.5 percent — with a cap of 8.5 percent for undergraduate loans. This year, the interest rate would be 4.4 percent according to the Washington Post, but it would increase in subsequent years. 


As the House Education in the Workforce Committee chairman, Kline — a Minnesota Republican — has contributors in both the nonprofit and for-profit education realms. For the 2011-2012 election, education was his top industry donor, with individuals donating a little less than $ 200,000 and education PACs donating more than $ 70,000. His top contributor for 2011-2012 was the Apollo Group, a corporation that owns for-profit schools, including the University of Phoenix. In 2011-2012, he was the second top recipient of contributions from the for-profit education industry, receiving more than $ 193,000, and the 10th top recipient of funds from the education industry overall at $ 268,000.



Senate Democrats largely oppose the Smarter Solutions for Students Act and have come up with a couple of their own proposals. S. 909: Responsible Student Loan Solutions Act sponsored by Sens. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), would connect the interest rate on Stafford loans to the rate on a 91-day Treasury bill, plus an additional percentage for loan administration costs. The education industry donated more than $ 66,000 to Reed in the 2012 campaign cycle, and more than $ 185,000 to Durbin. A companion bill was introduced in the House by Rep. John Tierney (D-MA) and Rep. Joe Courtney (D-CT). The education industry donated less than $ 30,000 to Tierney’s campaign and less than $ 18,000 to Courtney’s campaign.

Reed is also sponsoring S.953, the Student Loan Affordability Act, with Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), chairman of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. The bill extends the current 3.4 percent rate for subsidized Stafford loans for another two years in order to buy time to devise a long-term solution. Harkin garnered more than $ 146,000 from the education industry during the 2012 cycle.


Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) introduced the S. 897: Bank on Student Loan Fairness Act in early May, with a companion bill introduced the following week in the House by Tierney. The bill, which will enable the Federal Reserve to fund student loans at the same, 0.75 percent rate charged for banks, has found many backers in the education industry. Warren pulled in more than $ 1.2 million from education in her 2012 race — the most expensive in the nation, with more than $ 77 million spent by the two candidates alone. That placed her third among all education industry recipients in 2012. Her top contributors included five universities, with Harvard University ranked third, Massachusetts Institute for Technology ranked fourth, Boston University ranked sixth, University of California ranked seventh, and Brandeis University ranked 16th. Since the bill’s inception, 19 colleges, including Brandeis and MIT, and 14 organizations have supported the bill. These organizations include the American Federation of Teachers, which donated more than $ 15,000 to Warren in 2012.


Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) also announced the Federal Student Loan Refinancing Act in May, which gives students and graduates the ability to refinance their federal loans at a fixed rate of 4 percent if their rates are currently higher than that. The education industry donated a little less than $ 300,000 to Gillibrand in 2012; she was the 19th top education industry recipient that year.


Obama plans to veto Kline’s bill if it reaches his desk, yet seeks a different solution from those created by Democratic senators. His plan is to link rates to the Treasury’s borrowing costs, but fix the rates rather than reset them yearly. In addition, Obama’s plan would cap student borrowing costs so they would not exceed 10 percent of the student’s income.  


Obama was the favorite of the education industry overall in the 2012 campaign cycle, receiving more than $ 21 million. He ranked third with for-profit institutions, which gave him more than $ 79,000 for his last election. His top contributors included six schools within the University of California system, which donated more than $ 1.2 million; Harvard University, donating more than $ 668,000; Stanford University, which gave more than $ 512,000; Columbia University, contributing more than $ 455,000; the University of Chicago, with more than $ 357,000 donated, and the University of Michigan, which provide Obama with more than  $ 339,000.

While Obama is advocating for his student loan overhaul to pass, the government is positioned to profit the most if none of these bills are passed and unsubsidized Stafford student loan interest rates double on July 1. In May, the Congressional Budget Office upped its February estimate of what the Department of Education would earn from student loans in 2013 from $ 35.5 billion to $ 50.6 billion. As reported by the Washington Post, Obama’s plan would cost $ 33.4 billion during the next five years, but during the next ten years it would save the government $ 3.1 billion.


As July approaches, those in the education industry will discover whether their investments will yield them much sway over the future of student loan policy.




OpenSecrets Blog



Student Loan Debate, Redux, as Donor Schools Weigh In

Student Loan Debate, Redux, as Donor Schools Weigh In


student money.jpgA feeling of déjà vu permeates the current student loan debate. Just last June, President Barack Obama and Congress agreed on holding the interest rate for unsubsidized Stafford loans at 3.4 percent. But that agreement expires on July 1. If Congress does not pass negotiate another deal, unsubsidized Stafford loan interest those rates will double — meaning more than 7 million students will need to pay $ 1,000 more per loan per year, according to the White House.

Opensecrets.org data shows that the education industry has invested heavily in members of the House and Senate who currently are working on bills to address the issue. 


Rep. John Kline‘s proposal, H.R. 1911: Smarter Solutions for Students Act, gained House approval with a vote of 221-198 on May 23. The bill aims to peg subsidized and unsubsidized Stafford loan rates to the rates of 10-year Treasury notes plus 2.5 percent — with a cap of 8.5 percent for undergraduate loans. This year, the interest rate would be 4.4 percent according to the Washington Post, but it would increase in subsequent years. 


As the House Education in the Workforce Committee chairman, Kline — a Minnesota Republican — has contributors in both the nonprofit and for-profit education realms. For the 2011-2012 election, education was his top industry donor, with individuals donating a little less than $ 200,000 and education PACs donating more than $ 70,000. His top contributor for 2011-2012 was the Apollo Group, a corporation that owns for-profit schools, including the University of Phoenix. In 2011-2012, he was the second top recipient of contributions from the for-profit education industry, receiving more than $ 193,000, and the 10th top recipient of funds from the education industry overall at $ 268,000.



Senate Democrats largely oppose the Smarter Solutions for Students Act and have come up with a couple of their own proposals. S. 909: Responsible Student Loan Solutions Act sponsored by Sens. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), would connect the interest rate on Stafford loans to the rate on a 91-day Treasury bill, plus an additional percentage for loan administration costs. The education industry donated more than $ 66,000 to Reed in the 2012 campaign cycle, and more than $ 185,000 to Durbin. A companion bill was introduced in the House by Rep. John Tierney (D-MA) and Rep. Joe Courtney (D-CT). The education industry donated less than $ 30,000 to Tierney’s campaign and less than $ 18,000 to Courtney’s campaign.

Reed is also sponsoring S.953, the Student Loan Affordability Act, with Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), chairman of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. The bill extends the current 3.4 percent rate for subsidized Stafford loans for another two years in order to buy time to devise a long-term solution. Harkin garnered more than $ 146,000 from the education industry during the 2012 cycle.


Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) introduced the S. 897: Bank on Student Loan Fairness Act in early May, with a companion bill introduced the following week in the House by Tierney. The bill, which will enable the Federal Reserve to fund student loans at the same, 0.75 percent rate charged for banks, has found many backers in the education industry. Warren pulled in more than $ 1.2 million from education in her 2012 race — the most expensive in the nation, with more than $ 77 million spent by the two candidates alone. That placed her third among all education industry recipients in 2012. Her top contributors included five universities, with Harvard University ranked third, Massachusetts Institute for Technology ranked fourth, Boston University ranked sixth, University of California ranked seventh, and Brandeis University ranked 16th. Since the bill’s inception, 19 colleges, including Brandeis and MIT, and 14 organizations have supported the bill. These organizations include the American Federation of Teachers, which donated more than $ 15,000 to Warren in 2012.


Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) also announced the Federal Student Loan Refinancing Act in May, which gives students and graduates the ability to refinance their federal loans at a fixed rate of 4 percent if their rates are currently higher than that. The education industry donated a little less than $ 300,000 to Gillibrand in 2012; she was the 19th top education industry recipient that year.


Obama plans to veto Kline’s bill if it reaches his desk, yet seeks a different solution from those created by Democratic senators. His plan is to link rates to the Treasury’s borrowing costs, but fix the rates rather than reset them yearly. In addition, Obama’s plan would cap student borrowing costs so they would not exceed 10 percent of the student’s income.  


Obama was the favorite of the education industry overall in the 2012 campaign cycle, receiving more than $ 21 million. He ranked third with for-profit institutions, which gave him more than $ 79,000 for his last election. His top contributors included six schools within the University of California system, which donated more than $ 1.2 million; Harvard University, donating more than $ 668,000; Stanford University, which gave more than $ 512,000; Columbia University, contributing more than $ 455,000; the University of Chicago, with more than $ 357,000 donated, and the University of Michigan, which provide Obama with more than  $ 339,000.

While Obama is advocating for his student loan overhaul to pass, the government is positioned to profit the most if none of these bills are passed and unsubsidized Stafford student loan interest rates double on July 1. In May, the Congressional Budget Office upped its February estimate of what the Department of Education would earn from student loans in 2013 from $ 35.5 billion to $ 50.6 billion. As reported by the Washington Post, Obama’s plan would cost $ 33.4 billion during the next five years, but during the next ten years it would save the government $ 3.1 billion.


As July approaches, those in the education industry will discover whether their investments will yield them much sway over the future of student loan policy.




OpenSecrets Blog



Student Loan Debate, Redux, as Donor Schools Weigh In