Showing posts with label weigh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label weigh. Show all posts

Monday, September 2, 2013

Obama Was Right to Weigh In on Trayvon Martin Case


To some people, it has been said, all black people look alike. These days, all black issues seem to look alike, too.


What else explains the false comparisons that conservatives who ought to know better insist on making between two horrible, controversial and yet distinctly different racially charged tragedies?


One is the case of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black 17-year-old who was fatally shot in a Florida confrontation with George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer who is not black. The other tragic case is Chris Lane, an Australian baseball player who was fatally shot while jogging in Oklahoma where he was attending college.


Quite a number of conservatives have been searching for their own version of the Martin case ever since the original one erupted. Why? They want to catch President Barack Obama in a racial “Gotcha!”


The right has been steamed ever since the president was asked to comment on the Martin case and responded: “My main message is to the parents of Trayvon Martin. You know, if I had a son he’d look like Trayvon.”


Reactions to that remark illustrate the sad contours of America’s racial divide. As an African-American, I heard in Obama’s remarks a heartfelt expression of comfort and reassurance to the parents of a teenager that had been killed under suspicious circumstances. But some of my friends — and I’m talking about real friends, not just some figure of speech — heard a cynical expression of racial solidarity and tribalism from a president who is supposed to know better.


To confirm this Obama-is-a-racist narrative, they need to catch Obama in the act of racial hypocrisy. That’s why many of the same conservatives who had insisted race talk didn’t belong in the Trayvon Martin case rushed eagerly to inject it into the awesomely awful Lane case.


Two black teens have been charged with shooting Lane from a passing car allegedly driven by a white friend, who faces lesser charges. One of them was quoted by police as saying they committed this heinous act because they were “bored.”


Let’s be clear: None of these kids is a credit to his race. But Rush Limbaugh outdid his own high levels of windbag distortion in calling the Lane killing “Trayvon Martin in reverse, only worse.”


Fox News’ Eric Bolling, cohost of “The Five,” declared that mainstream media weren’t covering the “racially charged” Oklahoma shooting because it “seems they prefer to report on crimes where minorities are the victims.”


Never mind that Oklahoma District Attorney Jason Hicks denied that race motivated Lane’s killing. Why let mere facts get in the way of blimp-sized bloviations?


Black conservatives weighed in, too. One of them, Bob Woodson, head of the Center for Neighborhood Enterprises, brought a racially mixed luncheon crowd of Republicans to their feet with: “We should not wait for a white face before we get outraged. Evil is evil, whether it wears a white face or not.”


That’s right. Well said, Bob. In fact, despite rumors to the contrary, even the much-maligned Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have agreed in public with that much!


But outrage needs to be aimed at constructive action. To claim that the nationwide protests were only about Martin’s slaying misses the point. The outrage in Florida was aimed at how poorly Martin’s case was investigated.


Zimmerman was questioned quickly and released without charges. Meanwhile Martin’s body continued to lay in a morgue, unidentified and unclaimed, while his parents wondered all night where he was.


The parents wanted answers, but news media, including Fox, were not very interested in the story until activists and black talk radio stepped in. After protests grew, the state opened a proper investigation that led to Zimmerman’s prosecution.


Police say they released Zimmerman because they doubted they would be able to get a conviction. They may have been right, considering how Florida’s controversial “Stand Your Ground” law strengthens pleas of self-defense. Zimmerman’s not-guilty verdict fueled more protests to change such laws.


In short, let’s keep the real issues straight. The Chris Lane atrocity brought a swift response. The system worked. The Trayvon tragedy raised serious questions about whether the system works for everybody. Presidents always should raise that question, no matter what color they happen to be. 



Page is a Pulitzer Prize-winning syndicated columnist specializing in urban issues. He is based in Washington, D.C. E-mail: cptime@aol.com



RealClearPolitics – Articles



Obama Was Right to Weigh In on Trayvon Martin Case

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Republicans weigh using debt limit as leverage on Obamacare


U.S. Congressman and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) takes part in a panel discussion titled

U.S. Congressman and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) takes part in a panel discussion titled ”The Awesome Responsibility of Leadership” at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California April 29, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Gus Ruelas






WASHINGTON | Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:06pm EDT



WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Republican lawmakers, who staunchly oppose President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare law, are considering using a fall showdown over the country’s borrowing limit as leverage to try to delay the law’s implementation.


The idea is gaining traction among Republican leaders in the House of Representatives, aides said on Wednesday. An aide to House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said the debt limit is a “good leverage point” to try to force some action on the healthcare law known as “Obamacare.”


“There are plenty of discussions ongoing but no decisions at this point,” said another leadership aide.


Republicans are weighing the tactic as an alternative to another approach that would involve denying funding for the law and threatening a possible government shutdown.


The push to deny funding for Obamacare has the backing of some prominent Republican senators, including Ted Cruz of Texas and Marco Rubio of Florida.


But many Republicans in both the House and the Senate oppose the shutdown strategy, viewing it as a reckless move that is bound to fail. Many worry the gambit would cause a backlash against their party ahead of the 2014 congressional elections.


When lawmakers return on September 9 from their five-week summer recess, they will face two fall deadlines. If Congress does not pass a measure by October 1 to keep federal agencies funded, the government will shut down.


Another standoff looms in late October or early November when lawmakers must pass an increase in the U.S. debt limit or face a default on the country’s debt.


Under one scenario for tackling the fall fiscal fights, Republicans might pass a two-month spending bill at the end of September. That would remove any threat of a shutdown before the debt limit deadline comes up.


REPUBLICANS EYE FALL OBAMACARE ROLLOUT


As Congress and Obama spar over spending and the debt limit this fall, Obama will also be focused on the rollout of key provisions of the health care law that kick in at the beginning of 2014.


Republicans see the coming weeks as their last chance to try to stop or weaken the law. They contend the law will be a burden on businesses and cost jobs.


In the House of Representatives, Congressman Mark Meadows, a Republican from North Carolina, has been trying to rally House Republicans behind the government shutdown strategy and plans to release a letter on Thursday signed by lawmakers who support that tactic.


Those who are cool to the shutdown strategy include Cantor and House Speaker John Boehner. Just before lawmakers headed out on their August recess, Boehner sought to rally Republicans behind an alternative approaches to undermining Obamacare.


In a closed-door meeting with House Republicans Boehner said the chamber would “take targeted, regular votes” throughout the fall aimed at weakening Obamacare.


With lawmakers still scattered throughout the country during the summer break, Boehner plans to hold a conference call on Thursday with Republican House members.


A senior Republican aide said Boehner holds such calls every August and that the purpose “is just to hear from members” about what constituents are saying.


With Obamacare a top issue for many lawmakers, it is sure to be discussed during the call.


In town hall-style gatherings and meetings that lawmakers are having with constituents during the recess, Obamacare has emerged as one of the biggest issues.


“There’s concern, there’s worry and then there’s anger and fear,” said Congressman Marlin Stutzman, a Republican of Indiana.


Stutzman said he plans to sign the letter being circulated by Meadows of North Carolina calling for a defunding of Obamacare.


Conservative groups, including Heritage Action for America, have been holding events in lawmakers’ districts to try to pressure them to support the push to withhold funding for the healthcare law.


Heritage Action is spending $ 550,000 on online ads and is holding a multi-state tour to push the issue.


(Editing by Lisa Shumaker)






Reuters: Politics



Republicans weigh using debt limit as leverage on Obamacare

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Student Loan Debate, Redux, as Donor Schools Weigh In


student money.jpgA feeling of déjà vu permeates the current student loan debate. Just last June, President Barack Obama and Congress agreed on holding the interest rate for unsubsidized Stafford loans at 3.4 percent. But that agreement expires on July 1. If Congress does not pass negotiate another deal, unsubsidized Stafford loan interest those rates will double — meaning more than 7 million students will need to pay $ 1,000 more per loan per year, according to the White House.

Opensecrets.org data shows that the education industry has invested heavily in members of the House and Senate who currently are working on bills to address the issue. 


Rep. John Kline‘s proposal, H.R. 1911: Smarter Solutions for Students Act, gained House approval with a vote of 221-198 on May 23. The bill aims to peg subsidized and unsubsidized Stafford loan rates to the rates of 10-year Treasury notes plus 2.5 percent — with a cap of 8.5 percent for undergraduate loans. This year, the interest rate would be 4.4 percent according to the Washington Post, but it would increase in subsequent years. 


As the House Education in the Workforce Committee chairman, Kline — a Minnesota Republican — has contributors in both the nonprofit and for-profit education realms. For the 2011-2012 election, education was his top industry donor, with individuals donating a little less than $ 200,000 and education PACs donating more than $ 70,000. His top contributor for 2011-2012 was the Apollo Group, a corporation that owns for-profit schools, including the University of Phoenix. In 2011-2012, he was the second top recipient of contributions from the for-profit education industry, receiving more than $ 193,000, and the 10th top recipient of funds from the education industry overall at $ 268,000.



Senate Democrats largely oppose the Smarter Solutions for Students Act and have come up with a couple of their own proposals. S. 909: Responsible Student Loan Solutions Act sponsored by Sens. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), would connect the interest rate on Stafford loans to the rate on a 91-day Treasury bill, plus an additional percentage for loan administration costs. The education industry donated more than $ 66,000 to Reed in the 2012 campaign cycle, and more than $ 185,000 to Durbin. A companion bill was introduced in the House by Rep. John Tierney (D-MA) and Rep. Joe Courtney (D-CT). The education industry donated less than $ 30,000 to Tierney’s campaign and less than $ 18,000 to Courtney’s campaign.

Reed is also sponsoring S.953, the Student Loan Affordability Act, with Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), chairman of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. The bill extends the current 3.4 percent rate for subsidized Stafford loans for another two years in order to buy time to devise a long-term solution. Harkin garnered more than $ 146,000 from the education industry during the 2012 cycle.


Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) introduced the S. 897: Bank on Student Loan Fairness Act in early May, with a companion bill introduced the following week in the House by Tierney. The bill, which will enable the Federal Reserve to fund student loans at the same, 0.75 percent rate charged for banks, has found many backers in the education industry. Warren pulled in more than $ 1.2 million from education in her 2012 race — the most expensive in the nation, with more than $ 77 million spent by the two candidates alone. That placed her third among all education industry recipients in 2012. Her top contributors included five universities, with Harvard University ranked third, Massachusetts Institute for Technology ranked fourth, Boston University ranked sixth, University of California ranked seventh, and Brandeis University ranked 16th. Since the bill’s inception, 19 colleges, including Brandeis and MIT, and 14 organizations have supported the bill. These organizations include the American Federation of Teachers, which donated more than $ 15,000 to Warren in 2012.


Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) also announced the Federal Student Loan Refinancing Act in May, which gives students and graduates the ability to refinance their federal loans at a fixed rate of 4 percent if their rates are currently higher than that. The education industry donated a little less than $ 300,000 to Gillibrand in 2012; she was the 19th top education industry recipient that year.


Obama plans to veto Kline’s bill if it reaches his desk, yet seeks a different solution from those created by Democratic senators. His plan is to link rates to the Treasury’s borrowing costs, but fix the rates rather than reset them yearly. In addition, Obama’s plan would cap student borrowing costs so they would not exceed 10 percent of the student’s income.  


Obama was the favorite of the education industry overall in the 2012 campaign cycle, receiving more than $ 21 million. He ranked third with for-profit institutions, which gave him more than $ 79,000 for his last election. His top contributors included six schools within the University of California system, which donated more than $ 1.2 million; Harvard University, donating more than $ 668,000; Stanford University, which gave more than $ 512,000; Columbia University, contributing more than $ 455,000; the University of Chicago, with more than $ 357,000 donated, and the University of Michigan, which provide Obama with more than  $ 339,000.

While Obama is advocating for his student loan overhaul to pass, the government is positioned to profit the most if none of these bills are passed and unsubsidized Stafford student loan interest rates double on July 1. In May, the Congressional Budget Office upped its February estimate of what the Department of Education would earn from student loans in 2013 from $ 35.5 billion to $ 50.6 billion. As reported by the Washington Post, Obama’s plan would cost $ 33.4 billion during the next five years, but during the next ten years it would save the government $ 3.1 billion.


As July approaches, those in the education industry will discover whether their investments will yield them much sway over the future of student loan policy.




OpenSecrets Blog



Student Loan Debate, Redux, as Donor Schools Weigh In

Student Loan Debate, Redux, as Donor Schools Weigh In


student money.jpgA feeling of déjà vu permeates the current student loan debate. Just last June, President Barack Obama and Congress agreed on holding the interest rate for unsubsidized Stafford loans at 3.4 percent. But that agreement expires on July 1. If Congress does not pass negotiate another deal, unsubsidized Stafford loan interest those rates will double — meaning more than 7 million students will need to pay $ 1,000 more per loan per year, according to the White House.

Opensecrets.org data shows that the education industry has invested heavily in members of the House and Senate who currently are working on bills to address the issue. 


Rep. John Kline‘s proposal, H.R. 1911: Smarter Solutions for Students Act, gained House approval with a vote of 221-198 on May 23. The bill aims to peg subsidized and unsubsidized Stafford loan rates to the rates of 10-year Treasury notes plus 2.5 percent — with a cap of 8.5 percent for undergraduate loans. This year, the interest rate would be 4.4 percent according to the Washington Post, but it would increase in subsequent years. 


As the House Education in the Workforce Committee chairman, Kline — a Minnesota Republican — has contributors in both the nonprofit and for-profit education realms. For the 2011-2012 election, education was his top industry donor, with individuals donating a little less than $ 200,000 and education PACs donating more than $ 70,000. His top contributor for 2011-2012 was the Apollo Group, a corporation that owns for-profit schools, including the University of Phoenix. In 2011-2012, he was the second top recipient of contributions from the for-profit education industry, receiving more than $ 193,000, and the 10th top recipient of funds from the education industry overall at $ 268,000.



Senate Democrats largely oppose the Smarter Solutions for Students Act and have come up with a couple of their own proposals. S. 909: Responsible Student Loan Solutions Act sponsored by Sens. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), would connect the interest rate on Stafford loans to the rate on a 91-day Treasury bill, plus an additional percentage for loan administration costs. The education industry donated more than $ 66,000 to Reed in the 2012 campaign cycle, and more than $ 185,000 to Durbin. A companion bill was introduced in the House by Rep. John Tierney (D-MA) and Rep. Joe Courtney (D-CT). The education industry donated less than $ 30,000 to Tierney’s campaign and less than $ 18,000 to Courtney’s campaign.

Reed is also sponsoring S.953, the Student Loan Affordability Act, with Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), chairman of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. The bill extends the current 3.4 percent rate for subsidized Stafford loans for another two years in order to buy time to devise a long-term solution. Harkin garnered more than $ 146,000 from the education industry during the 2012 cycle.


Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) introduced the S. 897: Bank on Student Loan Fairness Act in early May, with a companion bill introduced the following week in the House by Tierney. The bill, which will enable the Federal Reserve to fund student loans at the same, 0.75 percent rate charged for banks, has found many backers in the education industry. Warren pulled in more than $ 1.2 million from education in her 2012 race — the most expensive in the nation, with more than $ 77 million spent by the two candidates alone. That placed her third among all education industry recipients in 2012. Her top contributors included five universities, with Harvard University ranked third, Massachusetts Institute for Technology ranked fourth, Boston University ranked sixth, University of California ranked seventh, and Brandeis University ranked 16th. Since the bill’s inception, 19 colleges, including Brandeis and MIT, and 14 organizations have supported the bill. These organizations include the American Federation of Teachers, which donated more than $ 15,000 to Warren in 2012.


Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) also announced the Federal Student Loan Refinancing Act in May, which gives students and graduates the ability to refinance their federal loans at a fixed rate of 4 percent if their rates are currently higher than that. The education industry donated a little less than $ 300,000 to Gillibrand in 2012; she was the 19th top education industry recipient that year.


Obama plans to veto Kline’s bill if it reaches his desk, yet seeks a different solution from those created by Democratic senators. His plan is to link rates to the Treasury’s borrowing costs, but fix the rates rather than reset them yearly. In addition, Obama’s plan would cap student borrowing costs so they would not exceed 10 percent of the student’s income.  


Obama was the favorite of the education industry overall in the 2012 campaign cycle, receiving more than $ 21 million. He ranked third with for-profit institutions, which gave him more than $ 79,000 for his last election. His top contributors included six schools within the University of California system, which donated more than $ 1.2 million; Harvard University, donating more than $ 668,000; Stanford University, which gave more than $ 512,000; Columbia University, contributing more than $ 455,000; the University of Chicago, with more than $ 357,000 donated, and the University of Michigan, which provide Obama with more than  $ 339,000.

While Obama is advocating for his student loan overhaul to pass, the government is positioned to profit the most if none of these bills are passed and unsubsidized Stafford student loan interest rates double on July 1. In May, the Congressional Budget Office upped its February estimate of what the Department of Education would earn from student loans in 2013 from $ 35.5 billion to $ 50.6 billion. As reported by the Washington Post, Obama’s plan would cost $ 33.4 billion during the next five years, but during the next ten years it would save the government $ 3.1 billion.


As July approaches, those in the education industry will discover whether their investments will yield them much sway over the future of student loan policy.




OpenSecrets Blog



Student Loan Debate, Redux, as Donor Schools Weigh In