Showing posts with label Limit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Limit. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

GOP Debt Limit Hostage-Taking - It"s Even Worse Than You Think

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



GOP Debt Limit Hostage-Taking - It"s Even Worse Than You Think

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

White House task force urges limit on NSA snooping



(AP) — A presidential advisory panel has recommended sweeping changes to government surveillance programs, including limiting the bulk collection of Americans’ phone records by stripping the National Security Agency of its ability to store that data in its own facilities. Court orders would be required before the information could be searched.


In a 300-page report released Wednesday, the five-member panel also proposed greater scrutiny of decisions to spy on friendly foreign leaders, a practice that has outraged U.S. allies around the world.


While the panel’s 46 recommendations broadly call for more oversight of the government’s vast spying network, few programs would be ended. There’s also no guarantee that the most stringent recommendations will be adopted by President Barack Obama, who authorized the panel but is not obligated to implement its findings.


The task force said it sought to balance the nation’s security with the public’s privacy rights and insisted the country would not be put at risk if more oversight was put in place. In fact, the report concludes that telephone information collected in bulk by the NSA and used in terror investigations “was not essential to preventing attacks.”


“We’re not saying the struggle against terrorism is over or that we can dismantle the mechanisms that we have put in place to safeguard the country,” said Richard Clarke, a task force member and former government counterterrorism official. “What we are saying is those mechanisms can be more transparent.”


The review group was set up as part of the White House response to leaks from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden about the scope of the government surveillance programs. Snowden is now a fugitive from U.S. authorities and was granted temporary asylum by Russia. The White House is conducting its own intelligence review, and Obama is expected to announce his decisions in January.


The White House had planned to release the panel’s report next month, but officials said they decided to make it public now to avoid inaccurate reporting about its content. It coincided with increased political pressure on Obama following a blistering ruling Monday from a federal judge who declared the NSA’s vast phone data collection likely was unconstitutional.


The judge, Richard Leon, called the NSA’s operation “Orwellian” in scale and said there was little evidence that its gargantuan inventory of phone records from American users had prevented a terrorist attack. However, he stopped his ruling from taking effect, pending a likely government appeal.


The panel’s most sweeping proposal would terminate the NSA’s ability to store the telephone data and instead require it to be held by the phone companies or a third party. Access to the data would then be permitted only through an order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.


“With regard to the bulk metadata of phone calls, we think there should be judicial review before that information is accessed, and we don’t think the government should retain it,” Clarke said.


If both recommendations were enacted, it’s likely they would slow down the intelligence collection process. The panel’s recommendations do allow for exceptions “in emergencies,” leaving open the possibility of intelligence agencies scanning the information quickly and asking for permission later if they suspect imminent attack.


The task force did not say how long the phone companies would be required to hold the private data. The phone companies’ retention policies vary markedly, according to information recently provided to the Senate Commerce Committee, ranging from one year at Verizon and US Cellular to five years at AT&T and seven to 10 years at T-Mobile.


Representatives of AT&T and Verizon declined to comment on the report and its recommendations. Spokesmen for T-Mobile and US Cellular didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.


Another major shift recommended by the task force would tighten federal law enforcement’s use of so-called national security letters, which give the government sweeping authority to demand financial and phone records without prior court approval in national security cases. The task force recommended that authorities should be required to obtain a prior “judicial finding” showing “reasonable grounds” that the information sought was relevant to terrorism or other intelligence activities.


The panel also tackled the diplomatic furor over NSA spying on the leaders of allied nations, including Germany. The group recommended that such spying be approved by the highest levels of government and that the decisions be based in part on whether the United States shares “fundamental values and interests” with the leaders of those nations.


The U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday unanimously adopted a resolution aimed at protecting the right to privacy against unlawful surveillance. Germany and Brazil introduced the resolution, which is legally nonbinding, following a series of reports of U.S. eavesdropping abroad, including on Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.


In a nod to critics’ complaints that government lawyers had no opposition in secret hearings about NSA programs before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the presidential advisory panel urged the creation of a “public interest advocate” to represent civil liberties and privacy interests before the court. The task force did not detail how the advocate would work, but Obama administration officials already have signaled their interest in the idea.


Snowden’s disclosures have angered an unusual coalition of liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans on Capitol Hill.


Following the release of the report, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said: “The message to the NSA is now coming from every branch of government and from every corner of our nation: You have gone too far.”


Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who has proposed legislation to shift control of telephone records from the NSA to the phone companies, said the new report was “impressive” and likely will carry a lot of weight for policymakers and Congress. The recommendation regarding custody of phone records by the companies “should put to rest that there’s a technological problem” with allowing the companies to hold them, he said in an interview.


Jameel Jaffer, deputy legal director of the ACLU, which has challenged the NSA’s surveillance programs in federal court, said Monday’s court ruling against the government and now the task force’s proposals would “put wind in the sails” of efforts in Congress to scale back the secret operations.


While the White House said Obama was reviewing the full report, he already had decided to pass over one of the panel’s recommendations. Last week, officials said the president would continue to allow the NSA director to also oversee the military’s cyberwarfare command, ensuring that a military official run the spy agency. The panel recommended that oversight for the units be split, allowing a civilian to head the NSA.


___


Associated Press writers Stephen Braun, Jim Kuhnhenn and Marcy Gordon contributed to this report.


___


Follow Julie Pace on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/jpaceDC and Kimberly Dozier at: http://twitter.com/KimberlyDozier


Associated Press



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | RFID | Amazon Affiliate

Top Headlines

White House task force urges limit on NSA snooping

Saturday, October 12, 2013

Senate rejects Democratic debt limit extension





Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, arrives at the Capitol to meet with fellow Republicans at an early closed-door caucus, in Washington, Saturday, Oct. 12, 2013. The federal government remains partially shut down and faces a first-ever default between Oct. 17 and the end of the month. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, arrives at the Capitol to meet with fellow Republicans at an early closed-door caucus, in Washington, Saturday, Oct. 12, 2013. The federal government remains partially shut down and faces a first-ever default between Oct. 17 and the end of the month. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., arrives to join Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, and fellow Republicans for an early closed-door meeting in the basement of the Capitol in Washington, Saturday, Oct. 12, 2013. The federal government remains partially shut down and faces a first-ever default between Oct. 17 and the end of the month. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland gestures towards the House floor as he gathers with House Democrats in Statuary Hall before they file onto the House chamber to sign a petition to re-open the government on Capitol Hill in Washington, Saturday, Oct. 12, 2013. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)





Top Headlines



Senate rejects Democratic debt limit extension

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Iran Will Offer to Limit Its Nuclear Program



Iran Will Offer to Limit Its Nuclear Program


Offer May Divide US From Rest of Negotiators


by Jason Ditz, October 08, 2013




According to Western officials familiar with the situation, Iran is expected to bring a package of serious proposals for a permanent settlement of the ongoing nuclear program dispute to the Geneva conference with the P5+1 next week.


The package will offer specific limits on the number of centrifuges Iran’s civilian enrichment program will use, and will reportedly also offer to phase out 20 percent enrichment and allow additional inspections above and beyond the requirements under their safeguards agreement, in return for an easing of sanctions.


The Iranian government has been winding down 20 percent enrichment at any rate, having made enough fuel rods for its aging US-built medical reactor for the rest of its life, and is more focused on ensuring a supply for its Bushehr power plant now, which runs on 3.5 percent enriched uranium. Weapons-grade uranium would need to be over 90 percent.


The offer may well split the P5+1 on the talks, with most of the nations likely to be in favor of an extremely reasonable Iranian offer and the US likely to be driven primarily by Israel’s opposition to any deal in general more inclined to counter with an “offer” for Iran to do all of this and more unilaterally without any real sanctions easing.


Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz






News From Antiwar.com



Iran Will Offer to Limit Its Nuclear Program

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

House GOP strategize debt limit fight

John Boehner arrives for the GOP leaders caucus at Capitol on Friday, October 4, 2013. | M.Scott Mahaskey/POLITICO

GOP leadership will also hear feedback from pols who went back to their districts. | M.Scott Mahaskey/POLITICO





House Republicans will meet in private session Tuesday morning to discuss additional ways to prod Democrats to negotiate over government funding and the debt limit.


GOP leadership is considering tying shutdown pay for federal employees to new language that would have the House and Senate appoint negotiators to wrangle over the deficit, debt and government funding. The plan elicited sighs from some senior Republican lawmakers, who saw this as a gimmick that moves Congress no closer to an actual deal. Republicans have been stymied, as Democrats stand unified against negotiating to end the government shutdown and lift the nation’s borrowing cap.







The government has been shut down for a week, and the Treasury Department says the debt ceiling must be lifted by Oct. 17.


In the closed session, which started at 9 a.m., Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) will also seek to hear feedback from rank-and-file lawmakers who went back to their districts Sunday. GOP leadership is eager to hear if there was significant backlash from constituents.


(PHOTOS: 25 great shutdown quotes)


Some conservatives in the House are pushing a short-term debt limit hike that would be accompanied by spending cuts, but Republican leadership is cool to that idea — and President Barack Obama and Senate Democrats say raising the debt ceiling will contain no policy riders.


The Senate’s Republican and Democratic conferences will caucus at separate lunches off the Senate floor Tuesday to hash out raising the debt ceiling. Stuck at a stalemate with the House on reopening the government, Senate Democratic leadership is mulling moving a bill that would raise the debt ceiling through the 2014 elections and would not include policy riders — although a shorter time frame may appeal more to Republicans.


The 54 members of the Senate Democratic Caucus appeared united on the debt ceiling plan Monday with the support of Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) but now must pick off six members of the GOP to vote with them and break a 60-vote procedural threshold for the bill — no easy lift given the lukewarm reception given to the proposal.


Republicans will not only have to hash out whether they will break precedent and block raising the debt ceiling but also whether to hold things up procedurally in the Senate. The longer the delay, the closer a vote in the Senate would come tothe Oct. 17 deadline and the more pressure to avert a catastrophic debt default.




POLITICO – Congress



House GOP strategize debt limit fight

Sunday, October 6, 2013

Treasury on debt limit danger

Lew warns of dangers if borrowing limit not raised


(AP) — Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew says it will be “dangerous” and “reckless” for Congress to pass an October deadline without raising the government’s borrowing limit.


Lew said Sunday that on Oct. 17 the government will lose the capacity to borrow because he will have exhausted all the extraordinary measures he has been using since May to free up room for more borrowing. He said the government has never before lost its borrowing ability.


In a CNN interview, Lew said that the government will have about $ 30 billion of cash on hand, but he said this was not a “responsible amount of cash to run the government on.”


He called on Congress to raise the $ 16.7 trillion borrowing limit before the deadline to avoid damage to the government’s credit standing.


Associated Press




U.S. Headlines



Lew warns of dangers if borrowing limit not raised

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Treasury Secretary: Congress must act to raise debt limit


U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew testifies before a Senate Banking hearing on ”The Financial Stability Oversight Council Annual Report to Congress.” on Capitol Hill in Washington May 21, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque




Reuters: Politics



Treasury Secretary: Congress must act to raise debt limit

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Republicans weigh using debt limit as leverage on Obamacare


U.S. Congressman and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) takes part in a panel discussion titled

U.S. Congressman and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) takes part in a panel discussion titled ”The Awesome Responsibility of Leadership” at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California April 29, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Gus Ruelas






WASHINGTON | Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:06pm EDT



WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Republican lawmakers, who staunchly oppose President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare law, are considering using a fall showdown over the country’s borrowing limit as leverage to try to delay the law’s implementation.


The idea is gaining traction among Republican leaders in the House of Representatives, aides said on Wednesday. An aide to House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said the debt limit is a “good leverage point” to try to force some action on the healthcare law known as “Obamacare.”


“There are plenty of discussions ongoing but no decisions at this point,” said another leadership aide.


Republicans are weighing the tactic as an alternative to another approach that would involve denying funding for the law and threatening a possible government shutdown.


The push to deny funding for Obamacare has the backing of some prominent Republican senators, including Ted Cruz of Texas and Marco Rubio of Florida.


But many Republicans in both the House and the Senate oppose the shutdown strategy, viewing it as a reckless move that is bound to fail. Many worry the gambit would cause a backlash against their party ahead of the 2014 congressional elections.


When lawmakers return on September 9 from their five-week summer recess, they will face two fall deadlines. If Congress does not pass a measure by October 1 to keep federal agencies funded, the government will shut down.


Another standoff looms in late October or early November when lawmakers must pass an increase in the U.S. debt limit or face a default on the country’s debt.


Under one scenario for tackling the fall fiscal fights, Republicans might pass a two-month spending bill at the end of September. That would remove any threat of a shutdown before the debt limit deadline comes up.


REPUBLICANS EYE FALL OBAMACARE ROLLOUT


As Congress and Obama spar over spending and the debt limit this fall, Obama will also be focused on the rollout of key provisions of the health care law that kick in at the beginning of 2014.


Republicans see the coming weeks as their last chance to try to stop or weaken the law. They contend the law will be a burden on businesses and cost jobs.


In the House of Representatives, Congressman Mark Meadows, a Republican from North Carolina, has been trying to rally House Republicans behind the government shutdown strategy and plans to release a letter on Thursday signed by lawmakers who support that tactic.


Those who are cool to the shutdown strategy include Cantor and House Speaker John Boehner. Just before lawmakers headed out on their August recess, Boehner sought to rally Republicans behind an alternative approaches to undermining Obamacare.


In a closed-door meeting with House Republicans Boehner said the chamber would “take targeted, regular votes” throughout the fall aimed at weakening Obamacare.


With lawmakers still scattered throughout the country during the summer break, Boehner plans to hold a conference call on Thursday with Republican House members.


A senior Republican aide said Boehner holds such calls every August and that the purpose “is just to hear from members” about what constituents are saying.


With Obamacare a top issue for many lawmakers, it is sure to be discussed during the call.


In town hall-style gatherings and meetings that lawmakers are having with constituents during the recess, Obamacare has emerged as one of the biggest issues.


“There’s concern, there’s worry and then there’s anger and fear,” said Congressman Marlin Stutzman, a Republican of Indiana.


Stutzman said he plans to sign the letter being circulated by Meadows of North Carolina calling for a defunding of Obamacare.


Conservative groups, including Heritage Action for America, have been holding events in lawmakers’ districts to try to pressure them to support the push to withhold funding for the healthcare law.


Heritage Action is spending $ 550,000 on online ads and is holding a multi-state tour to push the issue.


(Editing by Lisa Shumaker)






Reuters: Politics



Republicans weigh using debt limit as leverage on Obamacare

Friday, August 16, 2013

House GOP"s New Gambit: Tie Obamacare To The Debt Limit


Even as their hardliners refuse to let up, senior Republicans have all but conceded that they won’t end up defunding Obamacare in a continuing resolution to keep the federal government open after the money runs out on Sept. 30. And even if they do shut down the government, top Republicans observe, it won’t actually stop Obamacare. The strategy makes little sense.


But House Republican leaders are taking so much fire from conservative advocates that they’re weighing a more dangerous gambit: taking the United States’ ability to pay its bills hostage to advance the party’s goal of disrupting and dismantling the Affordable Care Act. The country’s borrowing authority is set to expire later this fall and senior Republicans made a series of promises to their members since January that appear likely to culminate in a showdown.


GOP leaders don’t see a way to persuade their members to lift the debt ceiling without attaching it to fiscal reforms. So a strategy they’re considering, first reported in the conservative news outlets National Review and Washington Examiner, is to pass a two-month continuing resolution to keep government funded at existing levels until, roughly, the debt limit is reached. Then they would offer a sequester replacement in exchange for delaying or defunding Obamacare in order to avoid economic disaster.


A House Republican leadership aide described this plan as an option, but cautioned TPM that no decisions have been made yet. “I do, however, expect that the President’s health care law will certainly come up — in some form or fashion — in the debt limit debate,” said the aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal strategy.


A second House GOP leadership aide also said no decisions have been made.


House Republicans are right that sequestration is a significant leverage point for them — they’ve largely embraced the indiscriminate spending cuts passed in 2011, while Democrats are eager to replace them. But a strategy of tying Obamacare to the debt ceiling carries a series of seemingly fatal flaws and potentially disastrous outcomes.


For starters, President Obama and his senior officials have vowed, repeatedly, not to negotiate on the debt ceiling under any circumstances. Their view is that the country’s borrowing limit is too important to subject to ideological debates, that raising it is Congress’ responsibility, and if they stand firm Republicans will be forced to back down. Back in January, when Obama refused to negotiate over the upcoming debt ceiling breach, they caved and ended up temporarily raising it without any substantial strings attached.


“We are not negotiating on the debt ceiling,” Obama told Democratic lawmakers just weeks ago.


But even if Democrats agreed to package a debt ceiling hike with other reforms, they’ve rejected repeated GOP efforts to damage Obamacare and they’re not about to cave now, on the eve of the law’s rollout. Not only would it show dramatic weakness and send the wrong signal at the wrong time, it would disrupt the frantic efforts of administration officials to make sure the law’s central provisions are ready to go live on Jan. 1. Enrollment on the insurance marketplaces begins on Oct. 1, after which delay is even less likely. And Obama is all but certain to veto a bill that meaningfully damages his signature achievement.


Which is why the gambit is extremely dangerous. If Republicans cater to conservative demands and raise expectations that Obamacare will be weakened in a debt limit deal, it could push Congress to the brink of letting the United States default on its debt, a move that stands to send shock waves through the economy, if not grind it to a halt.


The likelier endgame is that Republicans ultimately come up with a shiny object to distract their base and portray it as a concession by Democrats. That could include symbolic moves like Senate Democrats permitting a vote on House GOP legislation to delay parts of Obamacare, such as the individual mandate. Of course, Democrats would vote down such a bill, but it’d give Republicans a political weapon to use against vulnerable red-state Democrats in the 2014 elections, when they hope to win the Senate majority.


It won’t be easy for Republicans leaders to pull their members back from the brink, but as things stand, they probably won’t have a choice. As the White House sees it, ideological concessions such as weakening Obamacare and spending cuts are out of the question, and the debt ceiling debate ends either in a GOP cave or default.



Sahil Kapur

Sahil Kapur is TPM’s senior congressional reporter and Supreme Court correspondent. His articles covering politics and public policy have been published in The Huffington Post, The Guardian and The New Republic. He can be reached at sahil [at] talkingpointsmemo.com.





submit to reddit




TPM News



House GOP"s New Gambit: Tie Obamacare To The Debt Limit

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Tepco “deeply apologizes for mistake” — Admits ‘sprayed’ Fukushima workers actually exposed to 5 times ‘safe’ radiation limit — Radioactive dust to blame, not water spray? — Just In: Worker taken urgently to hospital in ‘bad condition’ (VIDEO)





Published: August 12th, 2013 at 11:48 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
3 comments



TEPCO Press Release, Aug. 12, 2013: Alarm Went off at the Dust Monitor Installed in front of the Main Anti-earthquake Building at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (Revision) [...] We would like to correct the content of the follow-up information No.2 of an alarm indicating high radiation dose went off at the continuous dust monitor installed in front of the Main Anti-earthquake Building at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station today (On August 12) as follows. After revision: “Since the maximum dose of approx. 19Bq/cm2 was detected from heads and faces of 10 people who were found to be contaminated” [...] Before revision: “Since the maximum dose of 10Bq/cm2 was detected from heads and faces of 10 people who were found to be contaminated”  [...] We deeply apologize for the mistake.



‘Revised’ Tepco report on contamination incident



AP, Aug. 13, 2013: 10 exposed to radiation at Japanese nuclear plant [...] Tokyo Electric Power Co. said it is still investigating how the workers were contaminated at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, but that it may have been from radioactive dust. [...]

NHK, Aug. 12, 2013 (h/t MsMilkytheclown1): Workers at Fukushima plant suffer radiation [...] Ten workers at the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant have been found exposed to radiation above the safe limit. [...] TEPCO officials say the workers were exposed to radiation at a level of 19 becquerels per square centimeter. That’s 5 times the limit set by the utility. The officials say the workers are showing no unusual symptoms. [...] They say radiation detectors were sounding in the area. [...]

TEPCO Press release, Aug. 12, 2013: Physical Disorder of a Worker at Resting Place of the Registration Center at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station [...] At around 3:10 PM today (on August 12), an associated company worker [...] complained of his bad condition (headache, nausea), so he received an aid such as drip infusion, etc. at emergency medical room of the Entrance Control Building. However, since no sign of recovery was found, a doctor was judged that he needs to be transported urgently to the hospital, and an ambulance was called around 4:00 PM on the same day. As a result of medical examination at the hospital, he was diagnosed with a mild symptom of dehydration. Currently, he is on a drip and will return home soon after a sign of recovery is found.


Watch NHK’s broadcast here





Published: August 12th, 2013 at 11:48 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
3 comments




WHAT REALLY HAPPENED



Tepco “deeply apologizes for mistake” — Admits ‘sprayed’ Fukushima workers actually exposed to 5 times ‘safe’ radiation limit — Radioactive dust to blame, not water spray? — Just In: Worker taken urgently to hospital in ‘bad condition’ (VIDEO)

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

New York City mayor vetoes bills to limit stop-and-frisk policy


New York Police Department officers stand in the Times Square in New York, April 25, 2013. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

New York Police Department officers stand in the Times Square in New York, April 25, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid






NEW YORK | Tue Jul 23, 2013 7:03pm EDT



NEW YORK (Reuters) – New York City Michael Bloomberg on Tuesday vetoed two measures meant to curb the city’s controversial stop-and-frisk policing policy, setting up a likely showdown with the City Council.


Bloomberg called the bills dangerous and irresponsible and said they would make the city less safe.


One measure would create an independent inspector general to monitor the New York City Police Department. The other would expand the definition of racial profiling and allow people who believe they have been profiled to sue police in state court.


Bloomberg has defended the policy of stopping, questioning and frisking suspected wrongdoers to fight crime.


Opponents of stop-and-frisk, among them minority groups, civil libertarians and some of the Democratic mayoral candidates, have said police officers disproportionately target young black and Hispanic men.


Each of the measures, together called the Community Safety Act, passed the 51-member City Council with the two-thirds majority necessary to override a veto.


City Council members who back the measures vowed to override Bloomberg’s vetoes.


“The Community Safety Act will help us make New York a place where everyone can walk the streets without fear of violence or discriminatory policing,” said Democratic council members Jumaane Williams and Brad Lander. “We look forward to overturning Mayor Bloomberg’s veto and making this legislation law.”


Bloomberg argued that the first measure would create not an inspector general but an official who would rival the police commissioner on law enforcement policy and strategy.


“The consequences would be chaotic, dangerous, and even deadly for our police officers and for our city,” he wrote. The second, he said, would unleash an avalanche of lawsuits against the police department.


Communities United for Police Reform, an organization that advocates an end to the stop-and-frisk policy, said it was disappointed by the vetoes, which it called “misguided.”


“New York City must outlaw racial profiling and all discriminatory profiling,” it said in a statement.


One of the Democratic mayoral candidates, Bill de Blasio, said Bloomberg was turning a blind eye to racial profiling.


“I believe we need a real change, and encourage City Council members to stand by their votes and override the Mayor’s veto,” he said in a statement. “Our young men cannot afford for us to waver in the face of intimidation from City Hall.”


(Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst, Toni Reinhold)






Reuters: Politics



New York City mayor vetoes bills to limit stop-and-frisk policy

New York City mayor vetoes bills to limit stop-and-frisk policy


New York Police Department officers stand in the Times Square in New York, April 25, 2013. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

New York Police Department officers stand in the Times Square in New York, April 25, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid






NEW YORK | Tue Jul 23, 2013 7:03pm EDT



NEW YORK (Reuters) – New York City Michael Bloomberg on Tuesday vetoed two measures meant to curb the city’s controversial stop-and-frisk policing policy, setting up a likely showdown with the City Council.


Bloomberg called the bills dangerous and irresponsible and said they would make the city less safe.


One measure would create an independent inspector general to monitor the New York City Police Department. The other would expand the definition of racial profiling and allow people who believe they have been profiled to sue police in state court.


Bloomberg has defended the policy of stopping, questioning and frisking suspected wrongdoers to fight crime.


Opponents of stop-and-frisk, among them minority groups, civil libertarians and some of the Democratic mayoral candidates, have said police officers disproportionately target young black and Hispanic men.


Each of the measures, together called the Community Safety Act, passed the 51-member City Council with the two-thirds majority necessary to override a veto.


City Council members who back the measures vowed to override Bloomberg’s vetoes.


“The Community Safety Act will help us make New York a place where everyone can walk the streets without fear of violence or discriminatory policing,” said Democratic council members Jumaane Williams and Brad Lander. “We look forward to overturning Mayor Bloomberg’s veto and making this legislation law.”


Bloomberg argued that the first measure would create not an inspector general but an official who would rival the police commissioner on law enforcement policy and strategy.


“The consequences would be chaotic, dangerous, and even deadly for our police officers and for our city,” he wrote. The second, he said, would unleash an avalanche of lawsuits against the police department.


Communities United for Police Reform, an organization that advocates an end to the stop-and-frisk policy, said it was disappointed by the vetoes, which it called “misguided.”


“New York City must outlaw racial profiling and all discriminatory profiling,” it said in a statement.


One of the Democratic mayoral candidates, Bill de Blasio, said Bloomberg was turning a blind eye to racial profiling.


“I believe we need a real change, and encourage City Council members to stand by their votes and override the Mayor’s veto,” he said in a statement. “Our young men cannot afford for us to waver in the face of intimidation from City Hall.”


(Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst, Toni Reinhold)






Reuters: Politics



New York City mayor vetoes bills to limit stop-and-frisk policy

Reid And Boehner On A Debt Limit Collision Course


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) each laid down incompatible positions on the debt limit Tuesday, possibly setting the stage for another round of brinksmanship this fall over whether the federal government will default on its obligations.


“We are not negotiating on the debt ceiling,” Reid told reporters. “The President has said this. I’ve said it. And I don’t know how many more times we need to say that.”


He was responding to a question about whether he’d consider GOP demands such as defunding Obamacare or significantly cutting spending in exchange for raising the debt limit.


Just hours earlier, Boehner put down an equally categorical marker.


“We’re not going to raise the debt ceiling without real cuts in spending. It’s as simple as that,” he said. He floated the so-called “Boehner rule” requiring dollar-for-dollar cuts, which Democrats acceded to in 2011 in order to raise the debt limit, as the right way to go.


Privately and publicly, White House officials insist that they won’t negotiate on the debt ceiling under any circumstances, and that it’s Congress’ duty to make sure the United States continues to pay its bills. Burned by the failed deficit talks of 2011, senior Obama aides also don’t trust Boehner to deliver Republican votes even if he does want a deal. (A running joke in the White House is that Boehner couldn’t deliver a pizza.)


Boehner, in particular, faces huge challenges within his conference.


His leadership team backed down earlier this year in the face of Democrats’ insistence that they won’t negotiate on the debt ceiling, convincing members to vote to increase temporarily the limit in exchange for forcing Senate Democrats to pass a budget. He now faces a conference full of vocal lawmakers who are demanding actual spending cuts and insist they won’t settle for anything less. Already aggrieved by the possibility of leadership violating the majority-of-the-majority principle on matters like immigration reform and the farm bill, they’re working to back Boehner into a corner.


Meanwhile, a significant faction of more moderate Senate Republicans, tired of going along with routine obstruction, are rising up against tea party conservatives and pushing for more cooperation with Democrats, be it on the budget, immigration or presidential nominees.


“I do think that some folks are starting to re-evaluate the consequence of giving a handful of very junior, very ideological Senators the unfettered ability to drive our side,” said an aide to a veteran Republican senator, speaking on condition of anonymity. “I think we may have learned in the recent crisis that having the sheer volume of objections at the same time is not in our interests. It makes it harder to argue the high ground.”


All the while, Boehner has repeatedly insisted that default is not an option, leaving many Democrats to conclude that he’s bluffing by suggesting he won’t permit a debt limit increase. On Tuesday his spokesman Brendan Buck called on Democrats to compromise.



Sahil Kapur

Sahil Kapur is a congressional reporter for TPM. He previously covered politics and public policy for numerous publications including The Guardian and The Huffington Post. He can be reached at sahil [at] talkingpointsmemo.com.





submit to reddit




TPM News



Reid And Boehner On A Debt Limit Collision Course

Reid And Boehner On A Debt Limit Collision Course


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) each laid down incompatible positions on the debt limit Tuesday, possibly setting the stage for another round of brinksmanship this fall over whether the federal government will default on its obligations.


“We are not negotiating on the debt ceiling,” Reid told reporters. “The President has said this. I’ve said it. And I don’t know how many more times we need to say that.”


He was responding to a question about whether he’d consider GOP demands such as defunding Obamacare or significantly cutting spending in exchange for raising the debt limit.


Just hours earlier, Boehner put down an equally categorical marker.


“We’re not going to raise the debt ceiling without real cuts in spending. It’s as simple as that,” he said. He floated the so-called “Boehner rule” requiring dollar-for-dollar cuts, which Democrats acceded to in 2011 in order to raise the debt limit, as the right way to go.


Privately and publicly, White House officials insist that they won’t negotiate on the debt ceiling under any circumstances, and that it’s Congress’ duty to make sure the United States continues to pay its bills. Burned by the failed deficit talks of 2011, senior Obama aides also don’t trust Boehner to deliver Republican votes even if he does want a deal. (A running joke in the White House is that Boehner couldn’t deliver a pizza.)


Boehner, in particular, faces huge challenges within his conference.


His leadership team backed down earlier this year in the face of Democrats’ insistence that they won’t negotiate on the debt ceiling, convincing members to vote to increase temporarily the limit in exchange for forcing Senate Democrats to pass a budget. He now faces a conference full of vocal lawmakers who are demanding actual spending cuts and insist they won’t settle for anything less. Already aggrieved by the possibility of leadership violating the majority-of-the-majority principle on matters like immigration reform and the farm bill, they’re working to back Boehner into a corner.


Meanwhile, a significant faction of more moderate Senate Republicans, tired of going along with routine obstruction, are rising up against tea party conservatives and pushing for more cooperation with Democrats, be it on the budget, immigration or presidential nominees.


“I do think that some folks are starting to re-evaluate the consequence of giving a handful of very junior, very ideological Senators the unfettered ability to drive our side,” said an aide to a veteran Republican senator, speaking on condition of anonymity. “I think we may have learned in the recent crisis that having the sheer volume of objections at the same time is not in our interests. It makes it harder to argue the high ground.”


All the while, Boehner has repeatedly insisted that default is not an option, leaving many Democrats to conclude that he’s bluffing by suggesting he won’t permit a debt limit increase. On Tuesday his spokesman Brendan Buck called on Democrats to compromise.



Sahil Kapur

Sahil Kapur is a congressional reporter for TPM. He previously covered politics and public policy for numerous publications including The Guardian and The Huffington Post. He can be reached at sahil [at] talkingpointsmemo.com.





submit to reddit




TPM News



Reid And Boehner On A Debt Limit Collision Course