Showing posts with label Schultz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Schultz. Show all posts

Saturday, March 8, 2014

Eat Your Own Words, Debbie Wasserman Schultz


At the end of 2013, Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz had some nasty words for yours truly. Irked that I used my Twitter feed to criticize her Obamacare propaganda efforts, Wasserman Schultz snarked back at me:


“Thanks for spreading the word! You’ll be eating them next year. #GetCovered.”


Classy as always. And completely wrong-headed as usual. Less than three months into 2014, how’s dutiful Debbie and her Dear Leader’s pet government takeover program doing? The most recent retreat measures — call it the Obamacare Endangered 2014 Midterm Democrats’ Rescue Plan — include:


–Allowing insurers for two extra years to continue selling plans that otherwise would have been banned by Obamacare. Last fall, Americans across the country and from all parts of the political spectrum raised an uproar in the wake of millions of Obamacare-induced cancellation notices on their individual market health plans. President Obama trotted out a “keep your plan” Band-Aid effective through this year. Now, the “transitional period” will extend through October 2016 and cover policyholders until the following September, after Obama is safely out of office.


–Extending the open enrollment period for 2015 from November 2014 to February 2015, a month longer than originally scheduled. (It will no doubt be extended again as the midterm elections get closer.)


–Relaxing eligibility requirements for insurers to qualify for financial help under a three-year program intended to cushion insurers’ costs of complying with Obamacare mandates.


–Exempting labor unions, universities and other self-insured employers from paying a fee that creates the above-noted fund.


In addition, the White House last month allowed medium-sized employers an extra year to comply with the Obamacare mandate to offer insurance to all full-time workers and reduced the percentage of workers that large companies are required to cover. These latest regulatory walk-backs by administrative fiat all come on the heels of dozens of administrative delays and rollbacks.


While Democrats complain about Republican Obamacare repeal efforts, we may be nearing a special inflection point at which the White House will have reneged on more Obamacare regulations than it’s actually enforcing!


Remember: In November 2010, the White House began issuing thousands of waivers to unions, cronies, businesses and organizations that offered affordable health insurance or prescription drug coverage with limited benefits outlawed by Obamacare. The federalized health care architects had sought to eliminate those low-cost plans under the guise of controlling insurer spending on executive salaries and marketing. Despite the waivers, the mandate has led to untold disruptions in the marketplace and has prompted businesses to cancel the beneficial plans altogether and/or slash wages and work hours.


In April 2011, Obama signed a bipartisan-backed law repealing his own onerous $ 22 billion Obamacare 1099 tax-compliance mandate that would have destroyed small businesses inundated with pointless paperwork.


Last March, with the support of several key Democrats, the Senate voted to repeal the Obamacare medical device tax. But the vote has not been enforced. Device makers have cut back on research and development. And according to the medical device manufacturers industry group AdvaMed, the punitive tax has forced companies to lay off or avoid hiring at least 33,000 workers over the past year.


In December and January, when Wasserman Schultz was busy acting like a 2-year-old in response to Obamacare critics, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius was busy:


–Delaying premium payment deadlines.


–Delaying high-risk insurance pool cancellations.


–Delaying equal coverage mandates that force companies to drop health benefits rewards for top executives.


–Delaying onerous “meaningful use” mandates on health providers grappling with Obamacare’s disastrous top-down electronic medical records rules.


While Wasserman Schultz defiantly claims all Democrats will proudly run on health care in 2014 and 2016, endangered Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan of North Carolina was caught on camera just last week literally running away from a journalist who dared to ask her about the 24 times she falsely promised that if you liked your plan, you could keep it under Obama.


It’s not just Hagan; every vulnerable Senate Democrat who rammed Obamacare down America’s throat is now running for the hills. When the White House now talks about the “Get Covered” campaign, it’s not about ordinary Americans getting health care. It’s about covering the backsides of the Obama water-carriers who may very well lose their jobs. They’re not just eating their words. They’re choking on Obamacare’s massive, inevitable, job-killing, life-threatening failures.


I’d like to tell bratty Wasserman Schultz that Obamacare critics will have the last laugh. But we’re too busy weeping at the senseless government-induced wreckage around us. 




RealClearPolitics – Articles



Eat Your Own Words, Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Ed Schultz Touts His Made-Up Statistic: "Most" Doctors Don"t Like Government, Vote GOP


According to Ed Schultz on Wednesday, “most” doctors hate government and vote Republican. What source did he cite for these claims? Well, none. The MSNBC anchor happily admitted he was just saying what came into his head. Railing against the compromise budget plan that passed the Senate, Schultz mentioned the “doc fix,” an effort to correct a problem in how doctors are paid by Medicare. Schultz snarled, “This is about the vote. Most doctors in this country vote Republican. Most of them don’t like government.” [MP3 audio here.]


For proof, the host touted, “Do I have anything to back that up? No, that’s just a gut feeling.” He added, “I’m willing to say that, because it’s just instinctively, that’s what I feel in this country.” The liberal New York Times disagreed with Schultz’s hunch.


In a May 30, 2011 article entitled, “As Physicians’ Jobs Change, So Do Their Politics,” writer Gardiner Harris suggested that Doctors may be moving towards the Democrats:


Doctors were once overwhelmingly male and usually owned their own practices. They generally favored lower taxes and regularly fought lawyers to restrict patient lawsuits. Ronald Reagan came to national political prominence in part by railing against “socialized medicine” on doctors’ behalf.


But doctors are changing. They are abandoning their own practices and taking salaried jobs in hospitals, particularly in the North, but increasingly in the South as well. Half of all younger doctors are women, and that share is likely to grow.


There are no national surveys that track doctors’ political leanings, but as more doctors move from business owner to shift worker, their historic alliance with the Republican Party is weakening from Maine as well as South Dakota, Arizona and Oregon, according to doctors’ advocates in those and other states.



A partial transcript of the December 17 segment is below:


5:07


ED SCHULTZ: You see, they believe, the Republicans, that all of these unemployed people in America, they’re Democrats. And they also believe that they’re not going to vote for the Republicans anyway. So that’s part of the equation. Oh, we did get the doc fix in this bill. How many Democratic doctors do you know? This is about the vote. Most doctors in this country vote Republican. Most of them don’t like government. Do I have anything to back that up? No, that’s just a gut feeling. I’m willing to say that, because it’s just instinctively, that’s what I feel in this country. So the game plan for the Democrats starts with something they really have no ledger to go on. You know what they have when it comes to dealing with John Boehner? A blank sheet of paper. That’s what they have.




— Scott Whitlock is Senior News Analyst at the Media Research Center. Follow Scott Whitlock on Twitter.





BiasAlerts



Ed Schultz Touts His Made-Up Statistic: "Most" Doctors Don"t Like Government, Vote GOP

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Wasserman Schultz: Dems Will Stand "In Unity" On Obamacare





“Tomorrow when that legislation comes on the floor, I’m confident the Democrats are going to stand, as we have, in unity to continue to support fully implementing the Affordable Care Act,” Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) said Thursday on CNN.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Wasserman Schultz: Dems Will Stand "In Unity" On Obamacare

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Schultz: Obama Made Progress With Syria Speech


MSNBC’s Ed Schultz and a panel of MSNBC analysts discuss whether President Obama’s address to the nation advanced his argument for military action against Syria and whether progress is being made on the overall challenge of dealing with Syria’s chemical weapons.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Schultz: Obama Made Progress With Syria Speech

Saturday, September 7, 2013

Schultz: Congress Has To Decide If They Want To Vote With Obama Or Against Their Constituents





ED SCHULTZ: The president is making the case to Congress and the American people for a strike, but no one, including me, is buying it. And I don’t think the American people are buying it. The most recent poll shows 59% of aware Americans are opposed to a strike while only 36% are in favor of a strike. Is that a number that the president can overcome? Maybe. The mood is similar in Congress with 199 members opposing or likely opposing a strike, but you have to say that the momentum is with the no votes right now.


You know, Congress is siding with the American people, and now the president is asking members of Congress to vote against the will of the people? That’s what it’s going to come down to if these poll numbers state same. The president is asking congress to take a leap of faith, it’s a ‘trust me’ moment. ‘I’ve been elected, I’ve been re-elected. I got bin Laden. I didn’t put troops on the ground in Egypt or in Libya, there were regime changes there. Freedom is on the march. We’re not attacking anybody. We’ve wound down in Afghanistan and we’re out of Iraq and we’re not spending billions on war anymore.’


The guy can make the case to the members of Congress and if you trust me on this, we’re going to be okay. This is the right thing to do. This is what the phone calls are going to sound like this weekend. Members of Congress are going to have to decide if they want to go with the president or if they want to go with their constituents. And make no mistake, now, the president is not in uncharted territory here. This isn’t something that has never happened before. Make no mistake, going against the people, if you’re a member of Congress, that body that you’re elected to, yes, you have gone against the people a number of times on a number of votes.


Earlier this year. 91% of the American people supported expanded background checks for gun purchases. Congress voted the measure down. 2011, 63% of Americans supported President Obama’s American Jobs Act. Everybody’s for jobs, right? The Congress wasn’t, they voted it down. 74% of Americans said that they wanted to end subsidies for Big Oil, eliminate all these subsidies going to the richest corporations of the world. Congress trashed The Repeal Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act.


So it’s not like the president is going to be picking up the phone saying, ‘You know what? I really need you to do something that you’ve never done before. You need to go against your constituents. You need to trust me.’ Well, you know, as we have documented on this show, Republicans have obstructed our nation’s first black president on everything. Republicans are voting against Syria not because they are morally opposed to war. Heck, they love war. They love confrontation. They love the war machine that they keep feeding and the manufacturing of it all.


They are voting against military action in Syria because they despise this is man and they do not want to give him any type of foreign policy credibility. Because you see, over the years the Republicans, they have always been the ones to be the experts on foreign policy and all the Democrats know how to do is be a bunch of doves. This guy is scoring high in the foreign policy world. Regardless of all of this, the debate in Congress for military action starts next week. I mean, if you love war and politics, this is your Super Bowl pre-game. It’s going to get hot. i think we need one of those good old fashioned hot debates on both floors of the House and the Senate. And we deserve it.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Schultz: Congress Has To Decide If They Want To Vote With Obama Or Against Their Constituents