Showing posts with label Sponsored. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sponsored. Show all posts

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Democrat Sponsored "Income Inequality"; Law of Bad Ideas, Yet Again

Democrat Sponsored "Income Inequality"; Law of Bad Ideas, Yet Again
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioD2VJMoBfavWelVXlhWcs564Lta2F1qUO3D4nl0PkOaGFGLZrHxOZ57pXFDIVb0twyXXvr511wgl4HsGLj0eClDvqk8EiqA9kPUQti6rRGqZpYxMW_yA-3z73Yic5j8BGtP0N_rytKaI/s1600/San+Jose+Pensions.png

Debate rages over “income inequality”.


CEOs makes hundreds or thousands of times more than workers. That is one aspect of income inequality. And it’s easily explained: The Fed’s inflation policies, bank bailouts, Fractional Reserve Lending, and crony capitalism are to blame.


That blame is nonpartisan.


Rather than attack the problem, “progressive” partisans howl over minimum wages.


Democrat-Sponsored Income Inequality


There is one major aspect of “income inequality” that you never hear president Obama or the Democrats mention, precisely because they are to blame.


Democrat-sponsored “income inequality” is even more insidious because it directly affects middle-class American who pay high taxes so public employees can retire in comfort with gold-plated guaranteed-for-life pensions.


Gold-Plated Retirements


In support of my above thesis, please consider In San Jose, Generous Pensions for City Workers Come at Expense of Nearly All Else.

Here in the wealthy heart of Silicon Valley, the roads are pocked with potholes, the libraries are closed three days a week and a slew of city recreation centers have been handed over to nonprofit groups. Taxes have gone up even as city services are in decline, and Mayor Chuck Reed is worried.

The source of Reed’s troubles: gold-plated pensions that guarantee retired city workers as much as 90 percent of their former salaries. Retirement costs are eating up nearly a quarter of the city’s budget, forcing Reed (D) to skimp on everything else.



Employee costs are growing nearly five times faster than revenues leading to fewer workers and budget deficits.


“This is one of the dichotomies of California: I am cutting services to my low- and moderate-income people . . . to pay really generous benefits for public employees who make a good living and have an even better retirement,” he said in an interview in his office overlooking downtown.


In San Jose and across the nation, state and local officials are increasingly confronting a vision of startling injustice: Poor and middle-class taxpayers — who often have no retirement savings — are paying higher taxes so public employees can retire in relative comfort.


“I got sick and tired of cutting services to my people — 10 years of services cuts — in order to balance the budget,” Reed said. “We got to the point where we were facing service delivery insolvency.”


In California, cities large and small are struggling to pay the growing public-sector retirement tab. Meanwhile, 55 percent of the state’s private-sector workforce — 6.3 million — have no retirement plan on the job.


Other governments are also struggling. In Chicago, Mayor Rahm Emanuel (D) has been pushing to scale back pensions for city workers, warning that without reform, city services will wither. Rhode Island enacted pension reforms in 2011 that trimmed retirement benefits for new workers and for those already on the payroll.


Enter the Law of Bad Ideas


Instead of admitting the system is hopelessly broken, Sacramento lawmakers want to create the nation’s first retirement savings plan for private-sector workers in which the state manages the money and guarantees a minimum rate of return.


Both cities and the State of California are struggling to pay pensions, yet the proposed solution by California lawmakers is to have the state guarantee even more pensions.


Worst yet, this guarantee would come when treasury yields are in the gutter and stocks 50% overvalued and poised for losses in any time period shorter than seven years according to John Hussman (and I happen to agree). For details, please see It Is Informed Optimism To Wait For The Rain


Note: John Hussman is one of many great speakers at Wine Country Conference II. If you haven’t yet signed up, please do. 


For such ideas to be proposed at the worst time is mind-boggling, yet strictly in accordance with “The Law of Bad Ideas“.


A number of corollaries clearly apply.


Corollary Three: Those in positions of political power not only have the worst ideas, they also have the means to see those ideas are implemented.


Corollary Four: The worse the idea, the more likely it is to be embraced by academia and political opportunists.


Corollary Five: No politically acceptable idea is so bad it cannot be made worse.


The reason CEOs make out like bandits is explained in Monetarism, Abenomics, QE, and Minimum Wage Proposals: One Bad Idea Leads to Another, and Another 


Brief History


  • Monetarists act on the theory falling prices are a bad idea

  • The Fed prints money and holds rates too low

  • Housing bubble builds

  • Medical and education prices soar

  • Student loans soar to “help” the students

  • Because housing is not affordable numerous affordable housing programs appear causing still more unwarranted housing demand. Few see the bubble because housing is not in the CPI

  • Housing crashes

  • The affordable housing advocates are abhorred by falling prices

  • Fed bails out banks and steps in to support housing prices

  • Income inequality soars

  • Students remain stuck with debt

Because of one idiotic notion, that “falling prices are a bad thing”, the Fed has generally managed to keep the CPI rising, with some prices rising much faster than others.


That leads to corollary number six, mentioned in the above link:


Law of Bad Ideas Corollary Six: Bad ideas lead to more bad ideas to fix problems caused by previous bad ideas.


And so here we are. To bail out the absurd idea that public pension promises are supportable, complete with 7.5 to 8.0 percent annual returns, when 10-year treasuries yield 2.67%, California proposes insuring private pensions as well.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis




Read more about Democrat Sponsored "Income Inequality"; Law of Bad Ideas, Yet Again and other interesting subjects concerning Economy at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

[258] Gov. Shutdown Sham Delayed, NSA Sponsored Drones, Professor Griff Fights the Power

[258] Gov. Shutdown Sham Delayed, NSA Sponsored Drones, Professor Griff Fights the Power
http://img.youtube.com/vi/wFcf3XntXjo/0.jpg


Abby Martin Breaks the Set on Government Shutdown Stupidity, Touchy Feely TSA, NSA Sponsored Drones, Professor Griff Fights the Power. LIKE Breaking the Set …




Read more about [258] Gov. Shutdown Sham Delayed, NSA Sponsored Drones, Professor Griff Fights the Power and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

[258] Gov. Shutdown Sham Delayed, NSA Sponsored Drones, Professor Griff Fights the Power

[258] Gov. Shutdown Sham Delayed, NSA Sponsored Drones, Professor Griff Fights the Power
http://img.youtube.com/vi/wFcf3XntXjo/0.jpg


Abby Martin Breaks the Set on Government Shutdown Stupidity, Touchy Feely TSA, NSA Sponsored Drones, Professor Griff Fights the Power. LIKE Breaking the Set …
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about [258] Gov. Shutdown Sham Delayed, NSA Sponsored Drones, Professor Griff Fights the Power and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Sunday, October 6, 2013

FLASHBACK - “The Salvador Option For Syria”: US-NATO Sponsored Death Squads Integrate “Opposition Forces”



[photo: US ambassador to Syria, Robert Stephen Ford]


This article was originally published in May 2012.


Modeled on US covert ops in Central America, the Pentagon’s “Salvador Option for Iraq” initiated in 2004 was carried out under the helm of the US Ambassador to Iraq John Negroponte (2004-2005) together with Robert Stephen Ford, who was appointed US Ambassador to Syria in January 2011, less than two months before the beginning of the armed insurgency directed against the government of Bashar Al Assad.

“The Salvador Option” is a “terrorist model” of mass killings by US sponsored death squads. It was first applied in El Salvador, in the heyday of resistance against the military dictatorship, resulting in an estimated 75,000 deaths.


US–sponsored death squads carrying  out their brutal work in El Salvador


John Negroponte had served as US ambassador to Honduras from 1981 to 1985. As Ambassador in Tegucigalpa, he played a key role in supporting and supervising the Nicaraguan Contra mercenaries who were based in Honduras. The cross border Contra attacks into Nicaragua claimed some 50,000 civilian lives.


In 2004, after serving as Director of National Intelligence in the Bush administration, John Negroponte was appointed US Ambassador to Iraq, with a very specific mandate: the setting up of “Salvador Option” for Iraq.  


The Salvador Option for Syria”: The Central Role of  US Ambassador Robert S. Ford


The US Ambassador to Syria (appointed in January 2011), Robert Stephen Ford had been part of Negroponte’s team at the US Embassy in Baghdad (2004-2005). In this regard, “The Salvador Option” for Iraq laid the groundwork for the launching of an armed insurgency in Syria in March 2011.   


In relation to recent events, the killing of 108 people including 35 children in the border city of Houla on May 27 was, in all likelihood, committed by US sponsored death squads under the “Salvador Option for Syria”. The deaths of civilians have been casually blamed by the Western media on the Al Assad government and the incident is being used as pretext for a “humanitarian” R2P intervention by NATO. Outright media fabrications, including the manipulation of images by the BBC suggest that the Syrian government was not behind the massacre:


“As information trickles out of Houla, Syria, near the city of Homs and the Lebanese-Syrian border, it is becoming clear that the Syrian government was not responsible for shelling to deaths some 32 children and their parents, as periodically claimed and denied by Western media and even the UN itself. It appears that instead, it was death squads at close quarters – accused by anti-government “activists” as being “pro-regime thugs” or “militias,” and by the Syrian government as the work of Al Qaeda terrorists linked to foreign meddlers.” (See Tony Cartalucci, Syrian Government Blamed for Atrocities Committed by US Sponsored Deaths Squads, Global Research, May 28, 2012)



Chronology of the Syria “Protest Movement”


US Ambassador Robert S. Ford was dispatched to Damascus in late January 2011 at the height of the protest movement in Egypt. (The author was in Damascus on January 27, 2011 when Washington’s Envoy presented his credentials to the Al Assad government).


At the outset of my stay to Syria in January 2011,  I reflected on the significance of this diplomatic appointment and the role it might play in a covert process of political destabilization. I did not, however, foresee that this destabilization agenda would be implemented within less than two months  following the instatement of Robert S. Ford as US Ambassador to Syria.


The reinstatement of a US ambassador in Damascus, but more specifically the choice of Robert S. Ford as US ambassador, bears a direct relationship to the onset of the insurgency integrated by death squads in mid-March 2011 (in the southern border city of Daraa) against the government of Bashar al Assad.


Robert S. Ford was the man for the job. As “Number Two” at the US embassy in Baghdad (2004-2005) under the helm of Ambassador John D. Negroponte, he played a key role in implementing the Pentagon’s “Iraq Salvador Option”. The latter consisted in supporting Iraqi death squads and paramilitary forces modelled on the experience of  Central America.



Ambassador Ford in Hama in July 2011


Since his arrival in Damascus in late January 2011 until he was recalled by Washington in October 2011, Ambassador Robert S. Ford played a central role in laying the groundwork within Syria as well as establishing contacts with opposition groups. The US embassy was subsequently closed down in February 2012.


Ford also played a role in the recruitment of Mujahideen mercenaries from neighboring Arab countries and their integration into Syrian “opposition forces”. Since his departure from Damascus, Ford continues to oversee the Syria project out of the US State Department:


“As the United States’ Ambassador to Syria—a position that the Secretary of State and President are keeping me in —I will work with colleagues in Washington to support a peaceful transition for the Syrian people. We and our international partners hope to see a transition that reaches out and includes all of Syria’s communities and that gives all Syrians hope for a better future. My year in Syria tells me such a transition is possible, but not when one side constantly initiates attacks against people taking shelter in their homes”. (US Embassy in Syria Facebook page)



“Peaceful transition for the Syrian people”? Ambassador Robert S., Ford is no ordinary diplomat. He was U.S. representative in January 2004 to the Shiite city of Najaf in Iraq. Najaf was the stronghold of the Mahdi army. A few months later he was appointed “Number Two Man” (Minister Counsellor for Political Affairs), at the US embassy in Baghdad at the outset of John Negroponte’s tenure as US Ambassador to Iraq (June 2004- April 2005). Ford subsequently served under Negroponte’s successor Zalmay Khalilzad prior to his appointment as Ambassador to Algeria in 2006.


Robert S. Ford’s mandate as “Number Two” (Minister Counsellor for Political Affairs) under the helm of Ambassador John Negroponte was to coordinate out of the US embassy, the covert support to death squads and paramilitary groups in Iraq with a view to fomenting sectarian violence and weakening the resistance movement.


John Negroponte and Robert S. Ford at the US Embassy worked closely together on the Pentagon’s project. Two other embassy officials, namely Henry Ensher (Ford’s Deputy) and a younger official in the political section, Jeffrey Beals, played an important role in the team “talking to a range of Iraqis, including extremists”. (See The New Yorker, March 26, 2007). Another key individual in Negroponte’s team was James Franklin Jeffrey, America’s ambassador to Albania (2002-2004).


It is worth noting that Obama’s newly appointed CIA head, General David Petraeus played a key role the organization of covert support to Syria’s rebel forces, the infiltration of Syrian intelligence and armed forces, etc.


Petraeus played a key role in Iraq’s Salvador Option. He led the Multi-National Security Transition Command (MNSTC)  “Counterinsurgency” program in Baghdad in 2004 in coordination with John Negroponte and Robert S Ford at the US Embassy in Baghdad.



General David Petraeus  (prior to his appointment as  Head of the CIA)


The CIA is overseeing covert ops in Syria. In mid-March, General David Petraeus met with his intelligence counterparts in Ankara, to discuss Turkish support for the Free Syrian Army (FSA)( CIA Chief Discusses Syria, Iraq With Turkish PM, RTT News, March 14, 2012)


David Petraeus, the CIA chief, held meetings with top Turkish officials both yesterday and on March 12, the Hürriyet Daily News learned. Petraeus met with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan yesterday and his Turkish counterpart, Hakan Fidan, head of the National Intelligence Organization (MİT), the previous day.


An official from the U.S. Embassy said that Turkish and American officials discussed “more fruitful cooperation on the region’s most pressing issues in the coming months.” Turkish officials said Erdoğan and Petraeus exchanged views on the Syrian crisis and anti-terror fight. (CIA chief visits Turkey to discuss Syria and counter-terrorism | Atlantic Council, March 14, 2012).



The US State Department in collaboration with several US intelligence agencies and the Pentagon is overseeing US support to the Free Syrian Army.


A Syria policy committee chaired by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton involves the participation of Ambassador Robert Stephen Ford, CIA director David Petraeus, Jeffrey Feltman, Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs and Derek Chollet, Principal Deputy Director of Clinton’s Policy Planning Staff at the State Department.


Under Jeffrey Feltman’s supervision, the actual recruitment of terrorist mercenaries, however, is carried out in Qatar and Saudi Arabia in liaison with senior intelligence officials from Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Libya and NATO. The former Saudi ambassador to the US, Prince Bandar, who remains a key member of Saudi intelligence, is said to be working with the Feltman group in Doha.


WWIII Scenario






WHAT REALLY HAPPENED



FLASHBACK - “The Salvador Option For Syria”: US-NATO Sponsored Death Squads Integrate “Opposition Forces”