Showing posts with label brace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label brace. Show all posts

Friday, April 4, 2014

Afghans Brace for Election-Day Violence...

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Afghans Brace for Election-Day Violence...

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Brace Yourself: Ragnarok is Coming in February

Brace Yourself: Ragnarok is Coming in February
http://thedailynewsreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/0c9e1__760px-Ragnarök_by_Doepler.jpg

760px-Ragnarök_by_DoeplerWith the Mayan apocalypse behind us, it’s time to focus on Ragnarok, the Viking apocalypse.


Via Unexplained Mysteries


According to Norse mythology the Vikings have their own version of doomsday and it is fast approaching.


The end of the world has come and gone several times over the last few years, from the turn of the millennium to the Mayan apocalypse, mankind seems obsessed with the fear of armageddon and the demise of all life as we know it.


The next such event, known as Ragnarok, is based on Norse mythology and tells of events leading up to the end of days. The countdown begins with the blowing of the horn of the Norse god Heimdallr to signify the world’s impeding destruction which is allegedly due to happen on February 22nd 2014.



Keep reading.


The post Brace Yourself: Ragnarok is Coming in February appeared first on disinformation.




disinformation




Read more about Brace Yourself: Ragnarok is Coming in February and other interesting subjects concerning The Edge at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, November 2, 2013

FOOD BANKS BRACE FOR RUN ON SUPPLIES

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



FOOD BANKS BRACE FOR RUN ON SUPPLIES

Monday, September 23, 2013

Doctors Brace for Surge of Ailing Patients...


Holy Cross Hospital’s health center in Aspen Hill, Maryland, is bracing for more business.


The center treats the uninsured, and has been busy since it opened in 2012 with a waiting list of more than 400 people at its clinic. Now, as a result of the U.S. Affordable Care Act, it’s mulling adding staff and hours in anticipation of next year’s rush of newly-insured patients, many with chronic medical conditions that have gone untreated for years.


Poorly controlled diabetes can cause stroke, kidney failure and blindness. Undiagnosed cancer can translate into complex end-of-life care, and untreated high blood pressure can lead to heart attacks. In effect, the 2010 health law’s biggest promise becomes its most formidable challenge: unprecedented access to care for a needy population when the nation is already grappling with overtaxed emergency rooms and a shortage of physicians.


“When you’re getting people that haven’t had insurance, they have significant health issues,” said Kevin Sexton, president and chief executive officer of Holy Cross Health, in a telephone interview. “A lot of people need these services.”


About 25 million Americans are expected to gain coverage under the health law, commonly known as Obamacare. Starting Oct. 1, as many as 7 million uninsured Americans will begin shopping for private plans through government-run exchanges, with many people eligible to have their premiums subsidized by taxpayers. On Jan. 1, Medicaid programs for low-income people will be expanded in about half the U.S. states.


Strained System


The increase in newly insured patients arrives at a time when the nation has 15,230 fewer primary-care doctors than it needs, according to an Aug. 28 assessment by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. And emergency rooms report being strained with visits that have risen at twice the rate of population growth.


“It’s like we’re handing out bus tickets and the bus is already full,” said Perry Pugno, vice president for medical education at the American Academy of Family Physicians, by telephone. “The shortfall of primary-care access is not an insignificant problem, and it’s going to get worse.”


Almost half of all uninsured, non-elderly adults had a chronic condition, based on a 2005 report by the Urban Institute and the University of Maryland. One in six with hypertension reported no visits to health professionals in a year.


Most who come to Holy Cross’s health center now lack insurance, and have lived for years with serious ailments, according to Elise Riley, the center’s medical director. “It’s frustrating to see diseases that could have been prevented,” she said in an interview in her office.


More demand may lead to months-long waits to see doctors, delays in finding specialists, and strains on hospitals and outpatient clinics, others said.


Patient Access


Ensuring patient access is critical to the Affordable Care Act’s success: if the newly insured swamp the medical system, it could hand critics pushing to derail the law another argument to fray public support. Sara Rosenbaum, a health-law professor at George Washington University in Washington, said she doesn’t believe it’s going to happen.


“It’s going to be a slow ramp up,” Rosenbaum said in a telephone interview. “It’s not like seven million people will get insurance at once. They’re not going to all come racing in the door.”


While that number of new patients can be debated, the status of those who do come in the door is not.


Patients who have had gaps in health insurance were more likely to have not gone to a doctor when sick or to have skipped getting prescriptions, according to an April 2013 report by the Commonwealth Fund, a New York-based foundation that works for health-care access. The uninsured were less likely to be up-to-date on recommended cholesterol, blood pressure, colon cancer screenings and mammograms.


Massachusetts Overhaul


Massachusetts pioneered health reform in 2006 when it enacted near universal coverage under then governor Mitt Romney. Community health centers and hospitals that care for a larger share of lower-income residents saw a 12 percent jump in patient volume from 2009 to 2010, with almost 100,000 more visits to safety net hospitals during that time, according to a 2012 report by the Kaiser Family Foundation.


David Longworth, chairman of the Medicine Institute at Ohio’s Cleveland Clinic, was working in Massachusetts when the state passed near universal health coverage.


“Practices closed and patients would wait for eight to nine months to get in,” Longworth said by telephone. “We overwhelmed the primary care health system.”


In cities such as Lawrence, Massachusetts, a former textile city that has long been home to a large immigrant community, doctors have coped with rising volume.


Patient Surplus


The Lawrence Family Medicine Residency, which provides primary care and other medical services to a largely low-income patient population, saw an uptick in patients, said Joseph Gravel, chief medical officer and residency program director.


“When you look at the experience in Massachusetts, it’s going to be bumpy” when Obamacare rolls out, Gravel said in a telephone interview.


The percentage of family doctors in the state accepting new patients has dropped 19 percent in the past seven years and the percentage of internists accepting new patients has fallen 21 percent over nine years, according to a July report by the Massachusetts Medical Society, an advocacy group for patients and physicians. Only about half of family doctors were accepting new patients this year.


The Cleveland Clinic predicts as many as 90,000 new patients in northeast Ohio if everyone signs up for coverage. The health system is working to ramp up its primary care practices in anticipation.


Exciting Challenge


At Grady Health System in Atlanta, more patients are expected, especially at its six outpatient centers. San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center in California has some expanded hours its 19 primary care centers. The centers are located in the hospital and out in the community.


“We anticipate an increase in primary care and specialty,” Chief Executive Officer Sue Currin said.


On a recent Friday morning at the Holy Cross clinic in Aspen Hill, Riley donned a white coat and prepared to see patients. While there may be more patients under reform, Riley said an increase in business will be welcome.


“I’ve very excited,” Riley said. “I’ve been dealing with uninsured patients for a long time. If they get coverage, we can prevent a lot of problems.”


To contact the reporter on this story: Stephanie Armour in Washington at sarmour@bloomberg.net


To contact the editor responsible for this story: Reg Gale at rgale5@bloomberg.net




Enlarge image Affordable Care Act Literature

Affordable Care Act Literature


Affordable Care Act Literature


About 25 million Americans are expected to gain coverage under the health law, commonly known as Obamacare.





About 25 million Americans are expected to gain coverage under the health law, commonly known as Obamacare. Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg




Acorda

4:45



Sept. 20 (Bloomberg) — Ron Cohen, chief executive officer of Acorda Therapeutics Inc., talks about implementation of the Affordable Care Act and its implications for the health-care industry. Cohen speaks with Sara Eisen, Tom Keene and Anna Edwards on Bloomberg Television’s “Surveillance.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard also speaks. (Source: Bloomberg)






Drudge Report Feed



Doctors Brace for Surge of Ailing Patients...

Sunday, June 23, 2013

Stakeholders brace for White House move on power plant emissions


By Valerie Volcovici


WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Before President Barack Obama unveils a plan to lower carbon emissions from thousands of existing U.S. power plants, stakeholders on all sides of the issue have attempted to make their mark on the regulations.


Electric utilities, environmental groups, large electricity consumers, and states have been working furiously behind the scenes for months to have a say in new rules that will be laid out by the Environmental Protection Agency.


Obama, in a video released by the White House on Saturday, confirmed that he will deliver a major speech on climate change on Tuesday. “I’ll lay out my vision for where I believe we need to go – a national plan to reduce carbon pollution,” Obama said.


Administration officials have said the White House will use the Clean Air Act to tackle power plants, which account for nearly 40 percent of greenhouse gas emissions.


This comes as no surprise to the companies and states that will have to either comply with or carry out the regulations. For the past few months, they have been working behind the scenes to influence the EPA before it begins what could be a months- or years-long rule-making process.


“The traditional industry response to EPA rule-making is – the EPA puts something out and then we respond to it,” said Emily Fisher, a director of legal affairs for energy and environment at electric industry lobby group Edison Electric Institute (EEI). “This is different in that we feel obligated to be more engaged early on.”


Fisher said the EPA will be in a “gray area” when it takes its first steps to regulate existing sources because the agency will need to use a rarely used and broadly worded section of the Clean Air Act, known as 111(d).


Under that statute the EPA would set federal emissions guidelines and decide upon the best systems or technologies for reducing emissions. Each state would then be left to set performance standards for its power plants and to determine how the plants will meet those standards.


Because there is little legal precedent for the rule, the agency will rely on a range of external sources for input, said Dina Kruger, a former director of the EPA climate change division and now a regulatory consultant.


EARLY START


Environmental group the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) has developed the most detailed proposal so far.


In December it unveiled a plan in which the EPA would set state-specific emissions rates that would give the states most reliant on coal-generated energy more time to comply.


Dan Lashof, NRDC’s climate and clean air program director, said the group wrote the plan to “rehabilitate the reputation of the Clean Air Act,” which critics say will raise electricity prices, “and show there is a flexible way to regulate carbon.”


Under the plan, a state that currently gets more electricity from coal-fired power plants than cleaner-burning natural gas or renewable energy would set an emissions rate target in 2020 that is higher than for a state that is less coal-dependent. States would then develop their own plans to meet the target.


The NRDC said its plan would cut carbon pollution 26 percent under 2005 levels by 2020 and cost $ 4 billion, which it said was a fraction of the cost of health and environmental damages from not acting on climate change.


But this approach may be vulnerable to legal challenges, said Robert Wyman, a lawyer at Latham and Watkins in Los Angeles who heads up a coalition of major companies that are also trying to influence the EPA rule-making.


The EPA “lacks the legal authority to differentiate among states in setting the eventual performance standards for specific fuel and technology subcategories,” Wyman said.


The National Climate Coalition, which includes companies such as Boeing, Shell and utilities NRG and Midwest Generation, has developed a framework for the EPA that Wyman feels would stand up to potential legal challenges.


Under their approach, the EPA would set separate emission performance standards for coal- and gas-fired power plants.


“The EPA would develop the basic building blocks for coordinated state action while leaving to the states the choice of approach,” according to a summary of their plan.


The NCC approach would let utilities calculate average emissions across their range of facilities, which in turn would enable states to use market-based mechanisms, such as trading of emissions permits.


EARLY ACTORS


Several states and certain utilities that have already taken steps to lower carbon levels at their plants will lobby the EPA to get credit for emissions already reduced under states’ carbon reduction or clean energy programs.


Xcel Energy, which operates in states with renewable energy mandates including Colorado and Minnesota, estimates that its greenhouse gas reductions by 2020 will be three to four times greater than if it kept its fleet of coal plants and tried to maximize their efficiency under future EPA regulations.


States such as California and the nine northeastern states in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which have market-based cap-and-trade systems in place, have also said they will seek equivalency.


The EEI also warned in a white paper on existing power plant rules in 2012 that while the EPA should give companies “flexible approaches” to meet the standard, “some are concerned that flexibility may open the door to more stringent standards.”


(Editing by Ros Krasny and Maureen Bavdek)




White House News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Stakeholders brace for White House move on power plant emissions

Stakeholders brace for White House move on power plant emissions




WASHINGTON | Sun Jun 23, 2013 12:30pm EDT



WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Before President Barack Obama unveils a plan to lower carbon emissions from thousands of existing U.S. power plants, stakeholders on all sides of the issue have attempted to make their mark on the regulations.


Electric utilities, environmental groups, large electricity consumers, and states have been working furiously behind the scenes for months to have a say in new rules that will be laid out by the Environmental Protection Agency.


Obama, in a video released by the White House on Saturday, confirmed that he will deliver a major speech on climate change on Tuesday. “I’ll lay out my vision for where I believe we need to go – a national plan to reduce carbon pollution,” Obama said.


Administration officials have said the White House will use the Clean Air Act to tackle power plants, which account for nearly 40 percent of greenhouse gas emissions.


This comes as no surprise to the companies and states that will have to either comply with or carry out the regulations. For the past few months, they have been working behind the scenes to influence the EPA before it begins what could be a months- or years-long rule-making process.


“The traditional industry response to EPA rule-making is – the EPA puts something out and then we respond to it,” said Emily Fisher, a director of legal affairs for energy and environment at electric industry lobby group Edison Electric Institute (EEI). “This is different in that we feel obligated to be more engaged early on.”


Fisher said the EPA will be in a “gray area” when it takes its first steps to regulate existing sources because the agency will need to use a rarely used and broadly worded section of the Clean Air Act, known as 111(d).


Under that statute the EPA would set federal emissions guidelines and decide upon the best systems or technologies for reducing emissions. Each state would then be left to set performance standards for its power plants and to determine how the plants will meet those standards.


Because there is little legal precedent for the rule, the agency will rely on a range of external sources for input, said Dina Kruger, a former director of the EPA climate change division and now a regulatory consultant.


EARLY START


Environmental group the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) has developed the most detailed proposal so far.


In December it unveiled a plan in which the EPA would set state-specific emissions rates that would give the states most reliant on coal-generated energy more time to comply.


Dan Lashof, NRDC’s climate and clean air program director, said the group wrote the plan to “rehabilitate the reputation of the Clean Air Act,” which critics say will raise electricity prices, “and show there is a flexible way to regulate carbon.”


Under the plan, a state that currently gets more electricity from coal-fired power plants than cleaner-burning natural gas or renewable energy would set an emissions rate target in 2020 that is higher than for a state that is less coal-dependent. States would then develop their own plans to meet the target.


The NRDC said its plan would cut carbon pollution 26 percent under 2005 levels by 2020 and cost $ 4 billion, which it said was a fraction of the cost of health and environmental damages from not acting on climate change.


But this approach may be vulnerable to legal challenges, said Robert Wyman, a lawyer at Latham and Watkins in Los Angeles who heads up a coalition of major companies that are also trying to influence the EPA rule-making.


The EPA “lacks the legal authority to differentiate among states in setting the eventual performance standards for specific fuel and technology subcategories,” Wyman said.


The National Climate Coalition, which includes companies such as Boeing, Shell and utilities NRG and Midwest Generation, has developed a framework for the EPA that Wyman feels would stand up to potential legal challenges.


Under their approach, the EPA would set separate emission performance standards for coal- and gas-fired power plants.


“The EPA would develop the basic building blocks for coordinated state action while leaving to the states the choice of approach,” according to a summary of their plan.


The NCC approach would let utilities calculate average emissions across their range of facilities, which in turn would enable states to use market-based mechanisms, such as trading of emissions permits.


EARLY ACTORS


Several states and certain utilities that have already taken steps to lower carbon levels at their plants will lobby the EPA to get credit for emissions already reduced under states’ carbon reduction or clean energy programs.


Xcel Energy, which operates in states with renewable energy mandates including Colorado and Minnesota, estimates that its greenhouse gas reductions by 2020 will be three to four times greater than if it kept its fleet of coal plants and tried to maximize their efficiency under future EPA regulations.


States such as California and the nine northeastern states in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which have market-based cap-and-trade systems in place, have also said they will seek equivalency.


The EEI also warned in a white paper on existing power plant rules in 2012 that while the EPA should give companies “flexible approaches” to meet the standard, “some are concerned that flexibility may open the door to more stringent standards.”


(Editing by Ros Krasny and Maureen Bavdek)






Reuters: Politics



Stakeholders brace for White House move on power plant emissions

Stakeholders brace for White House move on power plant emissions




WASHINGTON | Sun Jun 23, 2013 12:30pm EDT



WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Before President Barack Obama unveils a plan to lower carbon emissions from thousands of existing U.S. power plants, stakeholders on all sides of the issue have attempted to make their mark on the regulations.


Electric utilities, environmental groups, large electricity consumers, and states have been working furiously behind the scenes for months to have a say in new rules that will be laid out by the Environmental Protection Agency.


Obama, in a video released by the White House on Saturday, confirmed that he will deliver a major speech on climate change on Tuesday. “I’ll lay out my vision for where I believe we need to go – a national plan to reduce carbon pollution,” Obama said.


Administration officials have said the White House will use the Clean Air Act to tackle power plants, which account for nearly 40 percent of greenhouse gas emissions.


This comes as no surprise to the companies and states that will have to either comply with or carry out the regulations. For the past few months, they have been working behind the scenes to influence the EPA before it begins what could be a months- or years-long rule-making process.


“The traditional industry response to EPA rule-making is – the EPA puts something out and then we respond to it,” said Emily Fisher, a director of legal affairs for energy and environment at electric industry lobby group Edison Electric Institute (EEI). “This is different in that we feel obligated to be more engaged early on.”


Fisher said the EPA will be in a “gray area” when it takes its first steps to regulate existing sources because the agency will need to use a rarely used and broadly worded section of the Clean Air Act, known as 111(d).


Under that statute the EPA would set federal emissions guidelines and decide upon the best systems or technologies for reducing emissions. Each state would then be left to set performance standards for its power plants and to determine how the plants will meet those standards.


Because there is little legal precedent for the rule, the agency will rely on a range of external sources for input, said Dina Kruger, a former director of the EPA climate change division and now a regulatory consultant.


EARLY START


Environmental group the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) has developed the most detailed proposal so far.


In December it unveiled a plan in which the EPA would set state-specific emissions rates that would give the states most reliant on coal-generated energy more time to comply.


Dan Lashof, NRDC’s climate and clean air program director, said the group wrote the plan to “rehabilitate the reputation of the Clean Air Act,” which critics say will raise electricity prices, “and show there is a flexible way to regulate carbon.”


Under the plan, a state that currently gets more electricity from coal-fired power plants than cleaner-burning natural gas or renewable energy would set an emissions rate target in 2020 that is higher than for a state that is less coal-dependent. States would then develop their own plans to meet the target.


The NRDC said its plan would cut carbon pollution 26 percent under 2005 levels by 2020 and cost $ 4 billion, which it said was a fraction of the cost of health and environmental damages from not acting on climate change.


But this approach may be vulnerable to legal challenges, said Robert Wyman, a lawyer at Latham and Watkins in Los Angeles who heads up a coalition of major companies that are also trying to influence the EPA rule-making.


The EPA “lacks the legal authority to differentiate among states in setting the eventual performance standards for specific fuel and technology subcategories,” Wyman said.


The National Climate Coalition, which includes companies such as Boeing, Shell and utilities NRG and Midwest Generation, has developed a framework for the EPA that Wyman feels would stand up to potential legal challenges.


Under their approach, the EPA would set separate emission performance standards for coal- and gas-fired power plants.


“The EPA would develop the basic building blocks for coordinated state action while leaving to the states the choice of approach,” according to a summary of their plan.


The NCC approach would let utilities calculate average emissions across their range of facilities, which in turn would enable states to use market-based mechanisms, such as trading of emissions permits.


EARLY ACTORS


Several states and certain utilities that have already taken steps to lower carbon levels at their plants will lobby the EPA to get credit for emissions already reduced under states’ carbon reduction or clean energy programs.


Xcel Energy, which operates in states with renewable energy mandates including Colorado and Minnesota, estimates that its greenhouse gas reductions by 2020 will be three to four times greater than if it kept its fleet of coal plants and tried to maximize their efficiency under future EPA regulations.


States such as California and the nine northeastern states in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which have market-based cap-and-trade systems in place, have also said they will seek equivalency.


The EEI also warned in a white paper on existing power plant rules in 2012 that while the EPA should give companies “flexible approaches” to meet the standard, “some are concerned that flexibility may open the door to more stringent standards.”


(Editing by Ros Krasny and Maureen Bavdek)






Reuters: Politics



Stakeholders brace for White House move on power plant emissions