Showing posts with label google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label google. Show all posts

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Raytheon"s Riot Program Mines Social Network Data Like a Google for Spies

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



var addthis_config = "data_track_clickback":false,"data_track_addressbar":false,"data_track_textcopy":false,"ui_atversion":"300";
var addthis_product = "wpp-3.5.9";



Raytheon"s Riot Program Mines Social Network Data Like a Google for Spies

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

U.S. NSA tapped directly into Google, Yahoo traffic overseas - report

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



U.S. NSA tapped directly into Google, Yahoo traffic overseas - report

Google Is Reportedly Testing A Snooze Button (And More!) For Gmail

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Google Is Reportedly Testing A Snooze Button (And More!) For Gmail

Thursday, March 20, 2014

More Evil Than Genius? How iPad and Google Glass Makers Are Secretly Scamming America

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


More Evil Than Genius? How iPad and Google Glass Makers Are Secretly Scamming America

Monday, March 10, 2014

MILITARIZED: Google on Path to Become Gov"t Largest Contractor

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



MILITARIZED: Google on Path to Become Gov"t Largest Contractor

Friday, February 28, 2014

Google Files Emergency Motion To Restore Anti-Muslim YouTube Video


Google-owned YouTube is urging a federal appeals court to allow it to re-post the inflammatory “Innocence of Muslims” video pending its appeal of an unprecedented censorship order issued by the court, arguing that it and the public will otherwise “suffer irreparable harm to First Amendment and other constitutional freedoms” while waiting for a renewed appeal to be heard.


The Mountain View, California-based operator of the world’s most popular video-sharing site told that to a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which on Wednesday ordered Google to take down the video, which had sparked violent protests throughout the Muslim world in 2012.


A woman who was in the film, Cindy Lee Garcia, had asked a federal judge to order the removal of the film because she said she was fired from her job, received death threats and was tricked into starring in the “hateful anti-Islamic production.” Garcia, of California, believed she would be starring in an Arabian desert adventure film, according to her suit. But the 14-minute YouTube trailer produced by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula of Southern California portrays a different story — one of which she appears for five seconds in the film and asks: “is your Mohammed a child molester?”


A lower court in 2012 sided against the woman, and she appealed. Ruling 2-1, the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Garcia’s performance was independently copyrightable — an unprecedented decision that turns decades of copyright law on its head.


The White House had asked YouTube to review the footage to ensure that it comported with the media giant’s terms of service. YouTube did not remove it from U.S.-based viewers. However, YouTube has blocked the film in Egypt, Libya, Indonesia, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia.


Google, in its late Thursday filing with the appeals court, urged a stay of the decision so it could republish the film while it asks a larger panel of the same circuit to revisit the decision. Google said the decision went way beyond even what Garcia was demanding.


“[T]he Order imposes a restraint on Google that is broader than anything Ms. Garcia has even requested,” Google lawyer Neil Katyal wrote the appeals court in its emergency petition. “Ms. Garcia asked only that the five seconds of footage in which she appeared be removed from Google’s websites.”


The woman’s attorney, Cris Armenta, hailed the court’s ruling.


“Ordering YouTube and Google to take down the film was the right thing to do,” she said. “The propaganda film differs so radically from anything that Ms. Garcia could have imagined when the director told her that she was being cast in the innocent adventure film.”


The appeals court did not immediately rule on Google’s emergency motion.




Threat Level



Google Files Emergency Motion To Restore Anti-Muslim YouTube Video

Thursday, February 13, 2014

3,000 euro Google search: French blogger gets fined for re-posting indexed govt files

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



3,000 euro Google search: French blogger gets fined for re-posting indexed govt files

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Judge Napolitano: Google Glass App Nametag & What It Means For Privacy

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Judge Napolitano: Google Glass App Nametag & What It Means For Privacy

Sunday, February 9, 2014

James Dyson takes on Google with £5m investment in domestic robots

James Dyson takes on Google with £5m investment in domestic robots
http://www.prisonplanet.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-print/images/printer_famfamfam.gif


Charles Arthur
London Guardian
February 9, 2014


Sir James Dyson is taking on the might of Google by investing £5m in a British university to develop a new generation of “intelligent domestic robots”.


The company best known for its cyclone-power vacuum cleaners is putting the money into a new laboratory at Imperial College London, which has begun hiring up to 15 scientists who will work on developing robot vision systems that could be used in devices such as robot-controlled vacuum cleaners – a longstanding ambition of Dyson himself.


Dyson said the plan was to create “practical everyday technologies that will make our lives easier”.


The move could put Dyson into a position where it is directly challenging Google, which has recently acquired eight robotics companies, including Boston Dynamics, which has made self-controlling robots for the US military. In January it also spent £400m acquiring DeepMind Technologies, a London-based startup focusing on artificial intelligence.


Full article here


This article was posted: Sunday, February 9, 2014 at 7:38 am









Prison Planet.com




Read more about James Dyson takes on Google with £5m investment in domestic robots and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, February 1, 2014

Your Weekend PSA: Using Date Ranges in Google Search

This is a public service announcement about a feature of Google search that few people seem to know about: date ranges. This is useful in a couple of ways. First, I sometimes want only pages that are really recent, and it’s handy to be able to restrict results to the past hour or the past day. Alternatively, sometimes I’m looking for something old, which is hard to find because Google heavily prioritizes recent results. A specific date range fixes that.


In any case, it’s easy to specify a date range. After your results come up, click Search tools at the top of the page. Then click Any time and choose an option from the dropdown list. That’s it.




MoJo Blogs and Articles | Mother Jones



Your Weekend PSA: Using Date Ranges in Google Search

Friday, January 31, 2014

Obama answers citizens" questions in Google "hangout road trip"

Obama answers citizens" questions in Google "hangout road trip"
http://feeds.theguardian.com/c/34708/f/663871/s/369655de/sc/1/mf.gif

Hangout dubbed ‘first-ever presidential hangout road trip’ by White House as president took friendly questions from nine Americans












Technology news, comment and analysis | theguardian.com


Read more about Obama answers citizens" questions in Google "hangout road trip" and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Thursday, January 30, 2014

VIDEO: Lenovo to Use Motorola to Break Into U.S. Market







Google sells handset business to Lenovo for nearly $3 billion. Bryan Ma of IDC tells the WSJ’s Aaron Back how Motorola phones will give Lenovo a shortcut into the competitive U.S. Market.













Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.







To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.







VIDEO: Lenovo to Use Motorola to Break Into U.S. Market

Monday, January 27, 2014

Google buys artificial intelligence firm DeepMind Technologies for £400m

Google buys artificial intelligence firm DeepMind Technologies for £400m
http://hits.theguardian.com/b/ss/guardiangu-feeds/1/H.25.5/85985?ns=guardian&pageName=Article%3Agoogle-buys-artificial-intelligence-deepmind-technologies%3A2033484&ch=Technology&c3=Guardian&c4=Google+%28Technology%29%2CArtificial+intelligence+%28Technology%29%2CTechnology%2CComputing+%28Technology%29%2CTechnology+sector+%28business+sector%29%2CConsciousness%2CScience%2CBusiness%2CLondon+%28News%29%2CUK+news&c5=Unclassified%2CNot+commercially+useful%2CBusiness+Markets%2CTechnology+Gadgets%2CCorporate+IT&c6=Samuel+Gibbs&c7=2014%2F01%2F27+06%3A49&c8=2033484&c9=Article&c10=News&c13=&c19=GUK&c47=UK&c64=UK&c65=Google+buys+artificial+intelligence+firm+DeepMind+Technologies+for+%C2%A3400m&c66=News&c67=nextgen-compatible&c72=&c73=&c74=&c75=&h2=GU%2FNews%2FTechnology%2FGoogle


London-based firm set up by chess-prodigy-turned-neuroscientist is Google’s biggest ever European acquisition


A two-year-old British technology company set up by a former child chess prodigy who became a groundbreaking neuroscientist has become Google’s largest European acquisition.


The search giant is spending £400m ($ 625m) on DeepMind Technologies, a London-based firm set up in 2012, which recently developed a computer system capable of understanding and playing an Atari computer game simply by looking at it on a screen as a human would.


The artificial intelligence (AI) firm was created by Demis Hassabis, 37. Described as “very brilliant” by his peers, he was a chess master by 13, completed his A-levels two years early and at 17 was lead programmer on the classic game Theme Park at the videogames company Bullfrog. In 1999, aged 23, he won the Mind Sports Olympiad – an annual international multi-disciplined competition for games of mental skill. He won it a record five times before retiring in 2003 from competitive play.


Born in north London, Hassabis also carried out research on brain-damaged patients which established that being able to imagine experiences is key to being able to remember past events.


DeepMind reportedly competed with Google and other AI companies for talent, and Google’s chief executive, Larry Page, is said to have led the deal himself after an earlier approach from Facebook was turned down.


Sources close to the purchase indicated that the technology would be built into Google’s search systems, rather than becoming part of its fast-expanding robotics division. Google has bought eight robotics companies, including Bot & Dolly which made the computer-controlled cameras used in the film “Gravity”.


“DeepMind was generally interested in reinforcement learning, and in deep learning, which is very useful in mining so called ‘big data’, something Google has a lot of and is interested in processing,” said Murray Shanahan, a professor of cognitive robotics at Imperial College London.


Google uses AI to understand search queries that have been written as spoken, as well as pattern recognition for image search. Its translation service also relies heavily on AI to understand the context of words and their meaning in different situations and sentences.


The broader question of whether AI technology could be misused or pose a threat to humans has led to the creation of the Cambridge Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, which notes that “many scientists are concerned that developments in human technology may soon pose new, extinction-level risks to our species as a whole”.


The DeepMind acquisition is conditional on Google setting up an internal ethics board, sources told The Information.


Google confirmed the deal but would not supply any details.


Google’s other recent acquisitions have included the $ 3.2bn purchase of the smart fire alarm company Nest, described by Google’s Eric Schmidt as “an important bet” which will lead to products that are “infinitely more intelligent”.


Hassabis got a double first in computer science at Cambridge University in 1997, and returned to games as lead AI programmer on the landmark game Black & White. He set up his own games business, Elixir Studios, in 1998, but in 2005 he left for academia, working on cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence, and publishing influential papers on memory and amnesia.


After attaining a doctorate in cognitive neuroscience from University College London in 2009, Hassabis returned to business in 2012 to found DeepMind Technologies, alongside Shane Legg and Mustafa Suleyman.


Google acquired a string of robotics firms in 2013, culminating in the purchase of Boston Dynamics in December, the most high-profile purchase at the time and a company holding contracts with the US military.


Google’s robotics division was put under the leadership of the father of Android, Andy Rubin, in December, combining seven technology companies to foster a self-described “moonshot” robotics vision.


Google’s executive chairman, Eric Schmidt, told the Guardian last week that the company was aiming to be the world’s best personal assistant, and said the only limitation was the capability of the technology itself.


“We haven’t held back because people aren’t ready – we have held back because the technology doesn’t work yet,” he said. “It’s very hard to do. But we want it to be the best it can be – with opt in, full permission – to help me get through the day, figure out my questions and suggest questions I should ask people.” He added: “People are doing research into how computers discover knowledge instead of reporting what they figured out – many people are on the edge of that, so it’s maybe five years away.”





theguardian.com © 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds









Technology news, comment and analysis | theguardian.com


Read more about Google buys artificial intelligence firm DeepMind Technologies for £400m and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Google Drive gets an activity stream

Google Drive gets an activity stream
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif


IDG News Service – Google took another step toward giving its Apps suite an enterprise social networking (ESN) component with the new activity
stream feature for the Drive cloud storage piece.


Google said in a blog post that Drive’s activity stream is “a single, easy-to-view place to review every action taken on your files and
folders.”


“You’ll see a rundown of what your team has been doing, such as editing and commenting on team notes, adding a new spreadsheet,
renaming a presentation, sharing with your boss and more,” wrote Ian Gunn, Google Drive Interaction Designer.


By clicking on a specific file or folder, users will be able to see a list of actions related to it, according to Google.


Apps, a cloud email and collaboration suite for businesses, has been around since 2006, but Google hasn’t yet developed an
ESN component for it. Some customers and analysts believe Google should speed up its efforts to give ESN capabilities to Apps.


It has been assumed that Apps’ ESN features would be anchored in a workplace version of the Google+ social networking site.
So it’s interesting that this activity stream is showing up instead in Drive, the suite’s cloud storage component that is
deeply integrated with the suite’s office productivity apps for word processing, presentations and spreadsheets.


Google+ isn’t yet an official part of Apps, but customers can choose to make it available for their users.


Google didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment and more details about Drive’s activity stream and its ESN plans
for Apps.


ESN software has become very popular in recent years because it provides Twitter- and Facebook-like functionality for workplace
use, including employee profiles, activity streams, discussion groups, microblogging, commenting, document sharing and other
social media features.


ESN software is designed to complement companies’ existing communication and collaboration products, like email, IM, office
productivity apps, audio and video conferencing, by providing additional ways for employees to interact with each other.


Microsoft spent US$ 1.2 billion in 2012 to buy ESN vendor Yammer in order to boost the ESN features of SharePoint, Office 365
and several other of its business software products.


Pure-play ESN vendors include Jive Software and NewsGator, while some larger vendors have their own ESN products, including
Tibco (Tibbr), IBM (Connections), Cisco (WebEx Social) and Salesforce.com (Chatter.)


Juan Carlos Perez covers enterprise communication/collaboration suites, operating systems, browsers and general technology
breaking news for
The IDG News Service. Follow Juan on Twitter at @JuanCPerezIDG.





Netflash




Read more about Google Drive gets an activity stream and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, January 11, 2014

Geeks on the Google bus create giant social problem in San Francisco


By John Naughton, The Observer
Saturday, January 11, 2014 19:49 EST


A Google logo is seen through windows of Moscone Center in San Francisco during Google







  • Print Friendly and PDF

  • Email this page

  • John Naughton, The Observer


    Just under a year ago, Rebecca Solnit, a writer living in San Francisco, wrote a sobering piece in the London Review of Books about the Google Bus, which she viewed as a proxy for the technology industry just down the peninsula in Palo Alto, Mountain View and Cupertino.


    “The buses roll up to San Francisco’s bus stops in the morning and evening,” she wrote, “but they are unmarked, or nearly so, and not for the public. They have no signs or have discreet acronyms on the front windshield, and because they also have no rear doors they ingest and disgorge their passengers slowly, while the brightly lit funky orange public buses wait behind them. The luxury coach passengers ride for free and many take out their laptops and begin their work day on board; there is of course Wi-Fi. Most of them are gleaming white, with dark-tinted windows, like limousines, and some days I think of them as the spaceships on which our alien overlords have landed to rule over us.”


    The folks who travel behind those tinted windows, she continues, remind observers of “German tourists – neatly dressed, uncool, a little out of place, blinking in the light as they emerged from their pod”. They are, in fact, Google employees, many of them new to the region – “mostly white or Asian male nerds in their twenties and thirties” – who work in Mountain View but want to live in San Francisco for the same reasons that everyone used to want to live there – its tolerant, rackety, socially mixed atmosphere, varied housing stock, cosmopolitanism, cultural institutions, history etc.


    It’s a great piece, worth reading in full. It reminded me of a 2008 essay by John Lanchester in which he wrote prophetically about the pernicious impact that the banking industry was having on London. The moral in both cases is the same: any geographically concentrated industry that suddenly makes lots of youngish people very rich is going to have a major impact on its urban surroundings and much of that impact will be socially divisive.


    So, in both cities, property prices have skyrocketed, rents ditto, to the point where most ordinary people have difficulty finding a place to live, at least in anywhere that is remotely central. And as once-poor neighborhoods are gentrified, their older residents find themselves being patronized by their new, affluent neighbors.


    But at least in London, the newcomers affect to regard the old-timers as quaint. In San Francisco, the tech elite is more assertive. Here’s an example: a blog post headlined “10 Things I Hate About You”, by a geek named Peter Shih (motto: “I build things that make me happy”). “Hey San Francisco!” he writes, “if you’re going to have such an embarrassing excuse for a public transit system, at least build some fucking parking lots like Los Angeles. Why the fuck would I want to go anywhere if I have to choose between spending an hour on a bus where homeless people publicly defecate or an equally enraging hour of circling the same four street blocks trying to find parking on a 45-degree hill?”


    Here’s another in the same vein, from a startup chief executive named Greg Gopman. “I’ve traveled around the world and I gotta say there is nothing more grotesque than walking down Market Street in San Francisco. Why the heart of our city has to be overrun by crazy, homeless, drug dealers, dropouts, and trash I have no clue. Each time I pass it my love affair with SF dies a little.”


    In other cities, apparently, “the lower part of society keep to themselves. They sell small trinkets, beg coyly, stay quiet, and generally stay out of your way. They realize it’s a privilege to be in the civilized part of town and view themselves as guests. And that’s OK.”


    As it happens, Gopman got such backlash from his musings that he took down the blog post – though not before media blog Valleywag had cached it. But his attitude explains why there is now a groundswell of resentment in San Francisco against the technobrats whose ability to pay $ 5,000-plus a month in rent is making the city unaffordable for everyone else. It also explains why someone recently heaved a brick through the tinted windows of a Google bus.


    The irony here is that, as John Markoff and others have pointed out, one of the wellsprings of the tech industry was the hippy counterculture of 1960s San Francisco – that untidy, disorganized, anarchic ethos that generated the industry that enables these loudmouthed technobrats to live there now. But then, as someone once observed, if you don’t know history, then you’re like a leaf that doesn’t know it’s part of a tree.


    guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media 2014







    The Raw Story



    Geeks on the Google bus create giant social problem in San Francisco

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Google and the World Brain


Google and the World Brain


by Jon Rappoport


January 8, 2014


www.nomorefakenews.com


In a BBC documentary, “Google and the World Brain,”
the issue of author copyright is explored. Google has scanned and published out-of-print books that are still covered by copyright.


Interviewed, Kevin Kelly (twitter) (also here and here), the co-founder of Wired, makes a startling remark. In his view the whole issue of copyright is archaic. He explains that all authors draw their ideas from previous authors and therefore don’t own their own ideas.


It’s wonderful to witness such bloviating on the cusp of the New Civilization, in which “you didn’t build that” is taken to unprecedented levels.


Kelly should start a publishing firm; all his authors would work for free. After all, nothing is original, nothing is new, and these writers are merely rearranging other people’s words.


You might be surprised at how many people actually believe this tripe Kelly is passing along.


It’s part of the vastly expanding operation aimed at the individual.


The “modern” position is, we’re all one great big group. Kelly adds an historical touch. We’re just recycling the past.


Rimbaud was just redoing Shelley. Dylan Thomas was adding a few exhibitionist touches to Shakespeare, who was aping Sophocles. Plato was mimicking generations of Egyptian high priests. Socrates was staging dialogues based on arguments between cave men.


If we could climb into a time machine, we could travel back to the age of the Neanderthals and find all subsequent ideas of any value in their conversations. Certainly.


And I’m sure the Neanderthals were stealing thoughts after listening to what ants and gorillas and cabbages were saying.


The individual imagines and creates? Ho-ho-ho. Ridiculous. Kelly has put a lid on that fiction. Perhaps he’ll publish a list of authors from whom he’s borrowed, and then we can read their work and ignore his.


Yes, it’s all spiritual collectivism, and we’re melting down into one cosmic goo-glob, and it’s marvelous. Everything is free.


It’s all information” is the code phrase, as if all data are like all other data, and therefore diminished—in which case “information is power” means degraded and shrunken power.


When it comes to intelligence—that is, actual intelligence—the capacity to see how a book is unique, rather than “like” another book, is far more important than the perception of sameness.



The Matrix Revealed



And Kevin Kelly notwithstanding, the individual creator is real, not a fiction.


A book isn’t just a whole bunch of data, and it isn’t just a whole lot of borrowing and reshuffling from past authors.


The very basis of meaning, without which we would all be swimming in a sea of gibberish, isn’t a phenomenon of the Group. Meaning ultimately comes down to each individual and his perception. We may share a common language, but individuals shape it and individuals understand it. Or don’t.


The move to wipe out the entire concept of the individual and erase it from human consciousness is a propaganda op. It is far easier to wield control over a group.


We” isn’t an advanced form of “I.”


Here is where things are heading: “I/we is/are together.” Then: “We are together.” Then: “We.” Then: Nothing. Oblivion.


The failure to see this is a direct consequence of the failure of a person to know he is an individual.


That Google would even consider digitizing and publishing books that are still under copyright, that still belong to the author, reveals how casual their concept of the individual is.


Just another greedy mega-corporation” doesn’t capture what is really going on here.


Jon Rappoport


The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29thDistrict of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com




.



Jon Rappoport’s Blog



Google and the World Brain

Google and the World Brain


Google and the World Brain


by Jon Rappoport


January 8, 2014


www.nomorefakenews.com


In a BBC documentary, “Google and the World Brain,”
the issue of author copyright is explored. Google has scanned and published out-of-print books that are still covered by copyright.


Interviewed, Kevin Kelly (twitter) (also here and here), the co-founder of Wired, makes a startling remark. In his view the whole issue of copyright is archaic. He explains that all authors draw their ideas from previous authors and therefore don’t own their own ideas.


It’s wonderful to witness such bloviating on the cusp of the New Civilization, in which “you didn’t build that” is taken to unprecedented levels.


Kelly should start a publishing firm; all his authors would work for free. After all, nothing is original, nothing is new, and these writers are merely rearranging other people’s words.


You might be surprised at how many people actually believe this tripe Kelly is passing along.


It’s part of the vastly expanding operation aimed at the individual.


The “modern” position is, we’re all one great big group. Kelly adds an historical touch. We’re just recycling the past.


Rimbaud was just redoing Shelley. Dylan Thomas was adding a few exhibitionist touches to Shakespeare, who was aping Sophocles. Plato was mimicking generations of Egyptian high priests. Socrates was staging dialogues based on arguments between cave men.


If we could climb into a time machine, we could travel back to the age of the Neanderthals and find all subsequent ideas of any value in their conversations. Certainly.


And I’m sure the Neanderthals were stealing thoughts after listening to what ants and gorillas and cabbages were saying.


The individual imagines and creates? Ho-ho-ho. Ridiculous. Kelly has put a lid on that fiction. Perhaps he’ll publish a list of authors from whom he’s borrowed, and then we can read their work and ignore his.


Yes, it’s all spiritual collectivism, and we’re melting down into one cosmic goo-glob, and it’s marvelous. Everything is free.


It’s all information” is the code phrase, as if all data are like all other data, and therefore diminished—in which case “information is power” means degraded and shrunken power.


When it comes to intelligence—that is, actual intelligence—the capacity to see how a book is unique, rather than “like” another book, is far more important than the perception of sameness.



The Matrix Revealed



And Kevin Kelly notwithstanding, the individual creator is real, not a fiction.


A book isn’t just a whole bunch of data, and it isn’t just a whole lot of borrowing and reshuffling from past authors.


The very basis of meaning, without which we would all be swimming in a sea of gibberish, isn’t a phenomenon of the Group. Meaning ultimately comes down to each individual and his perception. We may share a common language, but individuals shape it and individuals understand it. Or don’t.


The move to wipe out the entire concept of the individual and erase it from human consciousness is a propaganda op. It is far easier to wield control over a group.


We” isn’t an advanced form of “I.”


Here is where things are heading: “I/we is/are together.” Then: “We are together.” Then: “We.” Then: Nothing. Oblivion.


The failure to see this is a direct consequence of the failure of a person to know he is an individual.


That Google would even consider digitizing and publishing books that are still under copyright, that still belong to the author, reveals how casual their concept of the individual is.


Just another greedy mega-corporation” doesn’t capture what is really going on here.


Jon Rappoport


The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29thDistrict of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com




.



Jon Rappoport’s Blog



Google and the World Brain

Google and the World Brain


Google and the World Brain


by Jon Rappoport


January 8, 2014


www.nomorefakenews.com


In a BBC documentary, “Google and the World Brain,”
the issue of author copyright is explored. Google has scanned and published out-of-print books that are still covered by copyright.


Interviewed, Kevin Kelly (twitter) (also here and here), the co-founder of Wired, makes a startling remark. In his view the whole issue of copyright is archaic. He explains that all authors draw their ideas from previous authors and therefore don’t own their own ideas.


It’s wonderful to witness such bloviating on the cusp of the New Civilization, in which “you didn’t build that” is taken to unprecedented levels.


Kelly should start a publishing firm; all his authors would work for free. After all, nothing is original, nothing is new, and these writers are merely rearranging other people’s words.


You might be surprised at how many people actually believe this tripe Kelly is passing along.


It’s part of the vastly expanding operation aimed at the individual.


The “modern” position is, we’re all one great big group. Kelly adds an historical touch. We’re just recycling the past.


Rimbaud was just redoing Shelley. Dylan Thomas was adding a few exhibitionist touches to Shakespeare, who was aping Sophocles. Plato was mimicking generations of Egyptian high priests. Socrates was staging dialogues based on arguments between cave men.


If we could climb into a time machine, we could travel back to the age of the Neanderthals and find all subsequent ideas of any value in their conversations. Certainly.


And I’m sure the Neanderthals were stealing thoughts after listening to what ants and gorillas and cabbages were saying.


The individual imagines and creates? Ho-ho-ho. Ridiculous. Kelly has put a lid on that fiction. Perhaps he’ll publish a list of authors from whom he’s borrowed, and then we can read their work and ignore his.


Yes, it’s all spiritual collectivism, and we’re melting down into one cosmic goo-glob, and it’s marvelous. Everything is free.


It’s all information” is the code phrase, as if all data are like all other data, and therefore diminished—in which case “information is power” means degraded and shrunken power.


When it comes to intelligence—that is, actual intelligence—the capacity to see how a book is unique, rather than “like” another book, is far more important than the perception of sameness.



The Matrix Revealed



And Kevin Kelly notwithstanding, the individual creator is real, not a fiction.


A book isn’t just a whole bunch of data, and it isn’t just a whole lot of borrowing and reshuffling from past authors.


The very basis of meaning, without which we would all be swimming in a sea of gibberish, isn’t a phenomenon of the Group. Meaning ultimately comes down to each individual and his perception. We may share a common language, but individuals shape it and individuals understand it. Or don’t.


The move to wipe out the entire concept of the individual and erase it from human consciousness is a propaganda op. It is far easier to wield control over a group.


We” isn’t an advanced form of “I.”


Here is where things are heading: “I/we is/are together.” Then: “We are together.” Then: “We.” Then: Nothing. Oblivion.


The failure to see this is a direct consequence of the failure of a person to know he is an individual.


That Google would even consider digitizing and publishing books that are still under copyright, that still belong to the author, reveals how casual their concept of the individual is.


Just another greedy mega-corporation” doesn’t capture what is really going on here.


Jon Rappoport


The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29thDistrict of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com




.



Jon Rappoport’s Blog



Google and the World Brain

Saturday, December 28, 2013

France Seeks Another Tax on Facebook, Google And YouTube, to Finance "French Culture" Cinema

The economic stupidity in France is astounding. It’s hard keeping up with all the inane ideas of President Francois Hollande’s socialist administration. Here’s another one of Hollande’s ideas for your amusement.


RT reports French broadcasting watchdog CSA eager to tax YouTube, Facebook, Dailymotion

France’s Superior Council of Audiovisual, an independent broadcasting authority, wants to impose taxes on media giants like YouTube, Facebook and Dailymotion to force them to contribute to financing French culture.

The sites fall into the same category as video-on-demand services, the organization said; so they would be subject to French cultural protection laws that require distributors to hand over some of their revenues to help subsidize productions.


“These platforms have been developing partnerships with audiovisual publishers and content providers for years, with which they share revenues from advertising,” the report [in French] said.


The watchdog has urged the French government to conduct research into the websites’ profit from professional productions and to determine how much they may be required to pay.


The obstacle which remains, though, is the fact that the legislation is only applicable to websites that are based in France. In the future, the organization is planning to demand all video-on-demand services to declare their existence to the CSA.


Culture Tax


Bloomberg reports France’s ‘Culture Tax’ Could Hit YouTube and Facebook

Should YouTube subsidize le cinéma français? France’s audiovisual regulator thinks so. In a report this week, the Superior Audiovisual Council (CSA) says that video-sharing websites should be subject to a tax that helps finance the production of French films and TV shows.

The so-called culture tax, totaling more than €1.3 billion ($ 1.8 billion) annually, is paid by movie theaters, broadcasters, and Internet service providers in France. The CSA contends that YouTube (GOOG), French video-sharing site DailyMotion, and their ilk are effectively providing video-on-demand services, which are already subject to the tax.


Separately, France is considering a tax on smartphones, tablets, and other devices as another source of revenue for cultural subsidies. A government-commissioned report, released in May, said that a sales tax of 1 percent should be imposed on electronic devices capable of accessing movies, music, and other content. The proposed tax would raise an estimated €86 million annually that would be used to finance the “cultural industries’ digital transition,” France’s Culture Ministry said at the time.


Trade associations for French Internet and technology companies spoke out against the proposal, which the government has not yet acted on. Rejecting the government’s assertion that a 1 percent tax would be “painless,” the groups warned in a statement in July that the government should be encouraging growth of the digital economy, rather than taxing it.


Subsidies For Films No One Watches


Forbes has some interesting comments as well. Please consider French Try Another Tax On Facebook, Google And YouTube

France is trying to impose another tax upon Facebook, Google and YouTube. It’s going to go into subsidies for all those French films that no one ever watches. Which is, of course, why they need subsidy.

The basic background here is that the French are so proud and so confident of the superiority of their culture that they fear it will be wiped out by all these imports of American and other “Anglo” productions. They thus have various limits on how many of these imports there can be: even to the point that in the past they have had exemptions from the standard European Union strictures on the free movement of goods and services. They’ve even got a law stating that English cannot be used in advertising: this named after the Minister that brought it in, Jack Allgood.


There is just one small problem with this:


The obstacle which remains, though, is the fact that the legislation is only applicable to websites that are based in France.


The moral of the story is “Don’t base websites, start businesses, or expand businesses in France”.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis



France Seeks Another Tax on Facebook, Google And YouTube, to Finance "French Culture" Cinema

France Seeks Another Tax on Facebook, Google And YouTube, to Finance "French Culture" Cinema

The economic stupidity in France is astounding. It’s hard keeping up with all the inane ideas of President Francois Hollande’s socialist administration. Here’s another one of Hollande’s ideas for your amusement.


RT reports French broadcasting watchdog CSA eager to tax YouTube, Facebook, Dailymotion

France’s Superior Council of Audiovisual, an independent broadcasting authority, wants to impose taxes on media giants like YouTube, Facebook and Dailymotion to force them to contribute to financing French culture.

The sites fall into the same category as video-on-demand services, the organization said; so they would be subject to French cultural protection laws that require distributors to hand over some of their revenues to help subsidize productions.


“These platforms have been developing partnerships with audiovisual publishers and content providers for years, with which they share revenues from advertising,” the report [in French] said.


The watchdog has urged the French government to conduct research into the websites’ profit from professional productions and to determine how much they may be required to pay.


The obstacle which remains, though, is the fact that the legislation is only applicable to websites that are based in France. In the future, the organization is planning to demand all video-on-demand services to declare their existence to the CSA.


Culture Tax


Bloomberg reports France’s ‘Culture Tax’ Could Hit YouTube and Facebook

Should YouTube subsidize le cinéma français? France’s audiovisual regulator thinks so. In a report this week, the Superior Audiovisual Council (CSA) says that video-sharing websites should be subject to a tax that helps finance the production of French films and TV shows.

The so-called culture tax, totaling more than €1.3 billion ($ 1.8 billion) annually, is paid by movie theaters, broadcasters, and Internet service providers in France. The CSA contends that YouTube (GOOG), French video-sharing site DailyMotion, and their ilk are effectively providing video-on-demand services, which are already subject to the tax.


Separately, France is considering a tax on smartphones, tablets, and other devices as another source of revenue for cultural subsidies. A government-commissioned report, released in May, said that a sales tax of 1 percent should be imposed on electronic devices capable of accessing movies, music, and other content. The proposed tax would raise an estimated €86 million annually that would be used to finance the “cultural industries’ digital transition,” France’s Culture Ministry said at the time.


Trade associations for French Internet and technology companies spoke out against the proposal, which the government has not yet acted on. Rejecting the government’s assertion that a 1 percent tax would be “painless,” the groups warned in a statement in July that the government should be encouraging growth of the digital economy, rather than taxing it.


Subsidies For Films No One Watches


Forbes has some interesting comments as well. Please consider French Try Another Tax On Facebook, Google And YouTube

France is trying to impose another tax upon Facebook, Google and YouTube. It’s going to go into subsidies for all those French films that no one ever watches. Which is, of course, why they need subsidy.

The basic background here is that the French are so proud and so confident of the superiority of their culture that they fear it will be wiped out by all these imports of American and other “Anglo” productions. They thus have various limits on how many of these imports there can be: even to the point that in the past they have had exemptions from the standard European Union strictures on the free movement of goods and services. They’ve even got a law stating that English cannot be used in advertising: this named after the Minister that brought it in, Jack Allgood.


There is just one small problem with this:


The obstacle which remains, though, is the fact that the legislation is only applicable to websites that are based in France.


The moral of the story is “Don’t base websites, start businesses, or expand businesses in France”.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis



France Seeks Another Tax on Facebook, Google And YouTube, to Finance "French Culture" Cinema